MAR 27, 202654 MINS READ
Mesoporous metal-organic frameworks distinguish themselves from microporous analogates through deliberate architectural design that expands pore dimensions into the mesoporous regime (2–50 nm) while retaining crystalline order and high surface area 3,5,10. The structural foundation of mesoporous MOFs rests on three critical components: metal nodes (SBUs), organic linking ligands, and the resulting three-dimensional coordination network.
Metal nodes in mesoporous MOFs typically consist of divalent transition metals (Zn²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Mn²⁺), trivalent metals (Al³⁺, Fe³⁺, Cr³⁺), or polynuclear clusters such as M₆O₄(OH)₄¹²⁻ (M = Zr⁴⁺, Ce⁴⁺, Hf⁴⁺) 12,15. These nodes serve as coordination vertices, with geometry (tetrahedral, octahedral, paddlewheel) dictating framework topology. For instance, zinc-based paddlewheel clusters [Zn₂(COO)₄] enable square-grid architectures that can be pillared with linear ligands to create tunable pore dimensions 1,15. Aluminum-based mesoporous MOFs, such as those synthesized from Al³⁺ and trimesic acid derivatives, exhibit exceptional hydrothermal stability (>400°C) and BET surface areas reaching 1500–3000 m²/g 5,6,11.
Organic ligands in mesoporous MOFs are predominantly aromatic di-, tri-, or polycarboxylates, though phosphonates, sulfonates, and nitrogen-containing heterocycles are also employed 1,3,9. Ligand length directly correlates with pore size: extending linear dicarboxylates from terephthalate (0.8 nm) to 4,4'-biphenyldicarboxylate (1.1 nm) or terphenyldicarboxylate (1.6 nm) systematically enlarges pore apertures in isoreticular MOF series (e.g., IRMOF-1 to IRMOF-16) 1,3. Triangular ligands such as trimesic acid (benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) or flexible tripodal linkers enable construction of cage-like mesopores with diameters exceeding 2 nm 19. Functionalization of ligands with alkyl, amine, or hydroxyl groups allows tuning of hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity and introduction of catalytic active sites without compromising framework integrity 4,11.
The pore architecture of mesoporous MOFs can be classified into three categories:
Mesoporous MOFs are further distinguished by the presence of coordinatively unsaturated metal sites (CUS), generated upon removal of coordinated solvent molecules (typically DMF, water, or methanol) via thermal activation (150–300°C under vacuum) 1,6. These five-coordinate or four-coordinate metal centers act as Lewis acid sites for chemisorption of polar molecules (CO₂, H₂O, NH₃) and catalytic activation of substrates. For example, desolvated CPO-27(Ni) exhibits CO₂ uptake of 8.2 mmol/g at 298 K and 1 bar, attributed to strong Ni²⁺–CO₂ interactions at CUS 1.
Thermal and chemical stability are critical for practical deployment. Aluminum-based mesoporous MOFs (e.g., MIL-100(Al), MIL-110(Al)) demonstrate stability up to 400–500°C and resistance to hydrolysis in boiling water for >24 hours, whereas zinc-based frameworks often decompose above 300°C or in humid environments 5,6,11. Zirconium-based mesoporous MOFs (e.g., UiO-66 derivatives, NU-1000) combine exceptional chemical robustness (stable in pH 1–12 aqueous solutions) with mesoporosity introduced via defect engineering or ligand extension 12,15.
The synthesis of mesoporous MOFs requires precise control over nucleation, crystal growth, and pore formation to achieve desired structural features. Four primary strategies dominate current research:
Conventional solvothermal synthesis involves dissolving metal salts (nitrates, chlorides, acetates) and organic ligands in polar aprotic solvents (DMF, DEF, DMA) or water, followed by heating in sealed autoclaves at 80–200°C for 12–72 hours 3,6,8. This method enables slow crystal growth and thermodynamic equilibration, yielding highly crystalline mesoporous MOFs with low defect densities. For example, MIL-101(Cr) is synthesized by reacting Cr(NO₃)₃·9H₂O with terephthalic acid in water at 220°C for 8 hours, producing green octahedral crystals with 2.9/3.4 nm cages and BET surface area 4100 m²/g 3,6.
Key parameters include:
Hydrothermal synthesis in pure water is advantageous for green chemistry and scalability. Aluminum mesoporous MOFs (MIL-100(Al), CAU-10(Al)) are hydrothermally synthesized at 210°C using Al(NO₃)₃ and trimesic acid, achieving BET surface areas >2000 m²/g without organic solvents 6.
Spray drying enables rapid, scalable production of mesoporous MOF microparticles (1–50 μm diameter) suitable for industrial applications 8. A solution containing metal salt and ligand is atomized into a heated chamber (150–250°C), where simultaneous reaction and solvent evaporation occur within milliseconds. This method produces spherical MOF particles with hierarchical porosity: mesopores (2–10 nm) between aggregated nanocrystals and micropores (<2 nm) within crystals 8. Spray-dried HKUST-1 (Cu-BTC) exhibits BET surface area 1200–1500 m²/g and improved mechanical strength compared to solvothermally synthesized powder 8.
Continuous flow reactors offer precise control over reaction conditions (temperature, pressure, residence time) and enable ton-scale production. For instance, continuous synthesis of UiO-66(Zr) in a tubular reactor at 120°C with 10-minute residence time yields mesoporous MOF with 20–30% missing-linker defects, creating 2–3 nm mesopores and enhancing catalytic activity 8.
Mesopores can be introduced into pre-formed microporous MOFs via controlled hydrolysis, ligand exchange, or metal node removal 2,14. Partial hydrolysis in basic aqueous solution (pH 10–12, 60–80°C, 2–24 hours) selectively cleaves metal-ligand bonds, generating mesopores (2–5 nm) while preserving overall framework topology 2,14. For example, treating microporous MOF-5 (Zn₄O(BDC)₃) with 0.1 M NaOH at 70°C for 6 hours creates 2.5 nm mesopores, increasing BET surface area from 3800 to 4200 m²/g and methane storage capacity from 180 to 210 cm³(STP)/cm³ at 35 bar 2,14.
Ligand exchange replaces short linkers with longer analogues post-synthetically. Soaking IRMOF-1 crystals in a DMF solution of 4,4'-biphenyldicarboxylic acid at 85°C for 48 hours substitutes ~30% of terephthalate linkers, expanding average pore size from 1.2 to 1.8 nm 4.
Defect engineering via modulated synthesis intentionally creates missing-linker or missing-cluster defects that manifest as mesopores. Adding 10–50 equivalents of monocarboxylic acid modulator (formic acid, acetic acid) during UiO-66 synthesis generates 15–40% defective nodes, producing 2–4 nm mesopores and increasing catalytic turnover frequency by 3–10× for bulky substrates 14.
A solvent-free approach involves impregnating mesoporous silica (MCM-41, SBA-15, pore diameter 2–10 nm) with metal salt and ligand precursors, followed by thermal treatment (100–200°C) to induce MOF crystallization within the silica pores 7. Subsequent etching with HF or NaOH removes the silica template, yielding mesoporous MOF replicas with pore sizes matching the template 7. This method produces MOF/mesoporous material hybrids with enhanced mechanical stability and hierarchical porosity for applications requiring shaped monoliths or membranes 7,13.
Comprehensive characterization is essential to validate mesoporosity, crystallinity, and functional properties:
Mesoporous MOFs address the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) target of 6.5 wt% gravimetric and 50 g/L volumetric hydrogen storage at ambient temperature and moderate pressure (<100 bar) 3,6. While microporous MOFs achieve high gravimetric uptake via physisorption (e.g., MOF-210: 17.6 wt% at 77 K, 80 bar), mesoporous MOFs enhance volumetric capacity by accommodating higher packing densities of H₂ molecules 3,6.
NU-100, a mesoporous Zr-MOF with 2.5 nm channels and BET surface area 6143 m²/g, stores 9.95 wt% (70 g/L) H₂ at 77 K and 56 bar 3. At 298 K and 100 bar, mesoporous MOF-177 (Zn-BTB, 1.1 nm pores) delivers 1.25 wt% excess H₂ uptake, approaching practical targets 6. Introduction of CUS via desolvation enhances H₂ binding enthalpy from 4–6 kJ/mol (physisorption) to 8–12 kJ/mol (chemisorption), improving room-temperature storage 1,6.
Mesoporous MOFs enable high-density methane storage (CH₄) for compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles, targeting DOE benchmarks of 263 cm³(STP)/cm³ at 35 bar and 298 K 11,19. HKUST-1 (Cu-BTC, 0.9 nm pores) achieves 230 cm³(STP)/cm³, while mesoporous MOF-519 (Al-TCPP, 2.1 nm cages) reaches 267 cm³(STP)/cm³ due to optimized pore geometry that maximizes CH₄ packing efficiency 11,19.
A novel mesoporous MOF combining flexible triangular ligands (trimesic acid) with linear ligands of varying lengths (BDC, BPDC) exhibits BET surface area 4800 m²/g and CH₄ uptake 280 cm³(STP)/cm³ at 35 bar, surpassing activated carbon (180 cm³(STP)/cm³) and extending vehicle range by 40% 19.
Mesoporous
| Org | Application Scenarios | Product/Project | Technical Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | Gas storage applications including hydrogen and methane storage, CO2 capture for climate change mitigation, and catalytic conversion of large organic molecules in chemical refining processes. | MIL-100(Al) Series MOF | Aluminum-based mesoporous MOF with BET surface area exceeding 2000 m²/g, thermal stability up to 400-500°C, and hydrothermal stability in boiling water for over 24 hours. |
| UNIVERSITY COURT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS | Chemisorption of polar molecules (CO2, H2O, NH3), Lewis acid catalysis, and selective gas separation in industrial adsorption systems. | CPO-27 Series MOF | Features coordinatively unsaturated metal sites (CUS) with five-fold coordination upon desolvation, achieving CO2 uptake of 8.2 mmol/g at 298 K and 1 bar through strong metal-CO2 interactions, with pore openings greater than 1 nm. |
| RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE | Industrial-scale gas separation membranes, shaped catalyst supports, and applications requiring mechanically robust porous materials with controlled morphology. | MOF/MPM Hybrid Materials | Solid-state crystallization of MOFs within mesoporous silica templates (MCM-41, SBA-15) creating hierarchical porosity with enhanced mechanical stability and shaped monoliths without solvent requirements. |
| Shanghaitech University | Compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicle fuel storage systems, high-density methane storage for transportation applications, and natural gas distribution infrastructure. | MOF-519 Methane Storage Material | Mesoporous aluminum-based MOF with 2.1 nm cages achieving methane storage capacity of 267 cm³(STP)/cm³ at 35 bar and 298 K, surpassing DOE targets and extending vehicle range by 40% compared to activated carbon. |
| ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company | Post-combustion CO2 capture from power plants, industrial flue gas treatment, carbon capture and storage for climate change mitigation, and greenhouse gas emission reduction systems. | MOF-based CO2 Capture Systems | Metal-organic frameworks with precisely controlled pore architecture enabling fine-tuning of adsorbent properties for carbon capture and storage (CCS), with optimized CO2 selectivity and capacity. |