MÉTODO DE DETERMINAÇÃO DE RAMPA DE POTÊNCIA

BR112025019980A2Pending Publication Date: 2026-08-04BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO LTD
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
BR112025019980
Authority / Receiving Office
BR · BR
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2023-03-21
Publication Date
2026-08-04

Smart Images

  • Figure 00000042_0000
    Figure 00000042_0000
  • Figure 00000042_0001
    Figure 00000042_0001
  • Figure 00000042_0002
    Figure 00000042_0002
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to the technical field of mobile communications, and provide a power ramping determination method and apparatus, and a communication device. For multiple physical random access channel (PRACH) transmissions in a random access channel (RACH) attempt, on the basis of configuration information of a network device or on the basis of a protocol agreement, a user equipment determines whether to perform power ramping. Provided is a power ramping mechanism under multiple PRACH transmissions, which determines a terminal behavior while ensuring PRACH coverage.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

/ 37 METHOD FOR DETERMINING POWER RAMP - TECHNICAL FIELD

[001] The description refers to the field of mobile communication technology, in particular to a method for determining power ramp, a power ramp determination apparatus and a communication device. FUNDAMENTALS

[002] In the 3G Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Edition 15 (R15), a single random access channel (RACH) attempt transmits the physical random access channel (PRACH) transmission only once. For PRACH retransmission, a power ramp mechanism is introduced, where each retransmission increases the PRACH transmission power by one step, specifying the conditions under which a user equipment (UE) performs the power ramp.

[003] In R18 CE WI, the introduction of a multiple PRACH transmission mechanism for a single RACH attempt is considered. Techniques such as uncorrelated fusion can increase the probability of successful detection and improve PRACH coverage. However, in scenarios where multiple PRACH transmissions are introduced, it is still unclear how the UE supports the power ramp mechanism in the RACH attempt. SUMMARY

[004] The description provides a method for determining power ramp, a power ramp determination apparatus and a communication device, and proposes a power ramp mechanism for a plurality of PRACH transmissions, which clarifies the behavior of the UE while ensuring PRACH coverage.

[005] According to a first aspect of the description modalities, a method for determining the power ramp is provided. The Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 6 / 90 / 37, the method is performed by a UE and includes: for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, determine whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on a protocol.

[006] According to a second aspect of the description modalities, a power ramp determination method is provided. The method is performed by a network device and includes: sending configuration information to a UE, wherein the configuration information carries information indicating whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

[007] According to a third aspect of the description's modalities, a UE is provided. The UE includes: a determination module, configured to, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, determine whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on a protocol.

[008] According to a fourth aspect of the description's embodiments, a network device is provided. The network device includes: a sending module, configured to send configuration information to a UE, in which the configuration information carries information indicating whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

[009] According to a fifth aspect of the description's modalities, a communication device is provided. The communication device includes: a transceiver, a memory, and a processor connected to the transceiver and the memory, respectively. The processor is configured to control the transceiver to receive and transmit wireless signals by executing computer executable instructions in memory and is capable of implementing either the first aspect's modalities method or the second aspect's modalities method.

[0010] According to a sixth aspect of description modalities, Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 7 / 90 / 37 a computer storage medium is provided. The computer storage medium stores executable computer instructions that, when executed by a processor, the executable computer instructions are capable of implementing the method of modalities of the first aspect of the description or the method of modalities of the second aspect of the description.

[0011] According to a seventh aspect of the description's modalities, a communication system is provided. The communication system includes: a UE and a network device. The UE is used to implement the modalities method of the first aspect of the description, and the network device is used to implement the modalities method of the second aspect of the description.

[0012] According to the power ramp determination method described, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the UE determines whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol. The description proposes a power ramp mechanism for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, which clarifies UE behavior while ensuring PRACH coverage.

[0013] Additional aspects and advantages of the description modalities will be provided in part in the following descriptions, will become evident in part from the following descriptions, or will be learned through the practice of description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of the description will become evident and easily understood from the following descriptions of the embodiments together with the attached drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a power ramp according to one embodiment of Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 8 / 90 / 37 description.

[0015] Figure 2 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a power ramp according to one embodiment of the description.

[0016] Figure 3 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a power ramp according to one embodiment of the description.

[0017] Figure 4 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a power ramp according to one embodiment of the description.

[0018] Figure 5 is an interactive schematic diagram of a method for determining a power ramp according to one embodiment of the description.

[0019] Figure 6 is a schematic block diagram of a power ramp determination apparatus according to one embodiment of the description.

[0020] Figure 7 is a schematic block diagram of a power ramp determination apparatus according to one embodiment of the description.

[0021] Figure 8 is a schematic block diagram of a power ramp determination apparatus according to one embodiment of the description.

[0022] Figure 9 is a schematic structural diagram of a communication device according to one embodiment of the description.

[0023] Figure 10 is a schematic structural diagram of a chip provided by one embodiment of the description. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0024] The modalities of the description are described in detail below, examples of which are shown in the attached drawings, in which the same Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, p. 9 / 90 / 37 reference numbers or similar numbers represent the same elements or similar elements or elements with equal or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the attached drawings are exemplary and are intended to explain the description, which should not be interpreted as limitations to the description.

[0025] To enhance PRACH coverage, R18 CE WI is considering introducing a mechanism for multiple PRACH transmissions for a single RACH attempt. This approach increases the probability of successful detection through techniques such as uncorrelated fusion. In contrast, R15 specifies that only one PRACH is transmitted per RACH attempt.

[0026] Regarding a power allocation priority for a plurality of uplink (UL) channels in a carrier aggregation (CA) scenario, R15 reached the following conclusions.

[0027] In a case where a component carrier (CC) / UL configured for UE is transmitted simultaneously on a shared physical uplink (PUSCH) / physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) for the same transmission duration, and different CCs and ULs from one or two PUCCH groups share the same numerology and exhibit overlapping transmission, when UE power is limited due to simultaneous transmissions in multiple service cells, the power allocation priority is: PRACH transmission in a primary cell (PCell) > positive acknowledgment / negative acknowledgment (ACK / NACK) transmission and / or scheduling request (SR) transmission in a PUCCH or a PUSCH > uplink control information (UCI) transmission in a PUCCH or a PUSCH > UCI on / off transmission in a PUSCH > probe reference signal (SRS) / PRACH transmission in a secondary cell (SCell).

[0028] 1. At the same priority level, PCell has a priority Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, p. 10 / 90 / 37 greater than SCell.

[0029] 2. To prevent transmission power from exceeding a maximum power (Pcmax), power reduction or transmission cancellation is applied first to the lowest priority, then to the second lowest priority, and so on until the aggregate power is less than or equal to the maximum power (Pcmax). Specifically, power reduction or transmission cancellation is implemented by the UE.

[0030] Therefore, if the sum of the UL transmission powers of all CCs within a slot exceeds the UE's maximum transmission power, the UE will carry out power allocation according to the priority above, to ensure channel transmissions with higher priorities. For channel transmissions with lower priorities, the decision on whether to carry out channel transmissions with reduced transmission power or to cancel these channel transmissions is determined by the UE.

[0031] In R15, the power ramp mechanism is introduced for PRACH retransmissions. With each additional retransmission, the PRACH transmit power will increase by one step. If any of the following three conditions occur, a power ramp counter will not increase its count number by 1: 1. An index of the Physical Broadcast Channel and Synchronization Block (PBCH) (SSB) used for RACH (RO) occasion selection has been changed; 2. A space filter for a UL transmission has been changed; and 3. The transmission power for the current PRACH transmission has been reduced or the current transmission has been canceled due to power allocation.

[0032] Therefore, according to the power allocation priority of the channels in R15, it can be determined that, for a PRACH transmission with the lowest channel priority, the transmission power may be reduced or the transmission may be cancelled. For such a situation, R15 specifies that the Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 11 / 90 / 37, the UE power ramp counter will pause its increment at 1. That is, if the transmission power for the current transmission is reduced or the current transmission is canceled, the power ramp will not be performed for the next PRACH retransmission.

[0033] However, the R18 CE WI introduced the power ramp mechanism for a plurality of PRACH transmissions. When the transmission power of one or more PRACH transmissions among the plurality of PRACH transmissions is reduced and / or one or more PRACH transmissions are cancelled, it is unclear how the UE performs the power ramp in the subsequent PRACH attempt.

[0034] Therefore, the description provides a method for determining power ramp, a power ramp determination apparatus and a communication device, and proposes a power ramp mechanism for a plurality of PRACH transmissions, which clarifies how the UE performs the power ramp when power allocation causes a reduction in transmission power of one or more PRACH transmissions and / or a cancellation of one or more PRACH transmissions among the plurality of PRACH transmissions.

[0035] It is understood that the solution provided by the description can be applied to Fifth Generation (5G) and its future communication technologies, such as advanced 5G and Sixth Generation (6G), which are not limited in the description.

[0036] The solution for determining the power ramp provided by the description will be presented in detail in conjunction with the attached drawings.

[0037] Figure 1 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining power ramp according to an embodiment of the description. As illustrated in Figure 1, the method is performed by a UE. In the embodiment of the description, the UE includes, but is not limited to, a UE. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 12 / 90 / 37 intelligent, a cell phone, a wireless device, an appliance, a mobile unit, a vehicle and a vehicle-mounted device, which is not limited in the description.

[0038] The method includes the following steps.

[0039] In step S101, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, it is determined whether the power ramp should be performed based on network device configuration information or based on a protocol.

[0040] In the embodiment of the description, the network device includes, but is not limited to, a switch, a router, a bridge, a hub, a connection port, a network interface card (NIC), a wireless access point (WAP), and a base station, which is not limited in the description.

[0041] It is understandable that in a scenario where R18 CE WI proposed performing a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, in the plurality of PRACH transmissions above, the PRACH retransmission may be initiated because the UE does not receive a Random Access Response (RAP), or the UE does not receive its corresponding RAP ID, or the UE fails contention resolution. If the power ramp mechanism is introduced at this point, the UE's behavior needs to be clarified. That is, it is necessary to determine under what conditions the UE performs or does not perform the power ramp.

[0042] In the description mode, the UE can determine whether to perform the power ramp based on configuration information or indication information from the network device. For example, when the UE receives configuration information or indication information from the network device that indicates to the UE to perform the power ramp on the PRACH relay, the UE performs the power ramp, that is, the power ramp counter count will be increased by one, and the PRACH transmission power will be increased by one step. The UE Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 13 / 90 / 37, can also determine whether to perform the power ramp based on the protocol. For example, if the protocol specifies that during 8 PRACH transmissions, even if the transmission power is reduced or the transmission is canceled in 3 PRACH transmissions due to power allocation, the power ramp will still be performed, that is, the power ramp counter count will still be increased by one.

[0043] It should be noted that the solution in the description can be applied to contention-free random access (CFRA) or contention-based random access (CBRA), which is not limited in the description.

[0044] In conclusion, according to the power ramp determination method described, for multiple PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the UE determines whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol. The description proposes a power ramp mechanism for multiple PRACH transmissions, which clarifies the UE's behavior while ensuring PRACH coverage.

[0045] Figure 2 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining power ramp according to an embodiment of the description. The method is performed by a UE. Based on the embodiment of Figure 1, as illustrated in Figure 2, the method includes the following steps.

[0046] In step S201, configuration information sent by a network device is received.

[0047] The configuration information carries information that indicates whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

[0048] Configuration information can be carried in a radio resource control (RRC) signal or in a downlink control information (DCI) field. For example, it can be configured directly in the RRC signal or it can be Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 14 / 90 / 37, referred to in the DCI field as some dynamic indications.

[0049] Configuration information can be implicit or explicit. If the configuration information is explicit, for example, when the indication information in the configuration information sent by the network device is 1, this indicates that the UE should perform the power ramp, and if the indication information is 0, this indicates that the UE should not perform the power ramp. If the configuration information is implicit, for example, if the configuration information is not received, or if the configuration information does not contain information indicating to the UE to perform the power ramp, it is determined that the power ramp will not be performed.

[0050] In step S202, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, it is determined whether the power ramp should be performed based on network device configuration information or based on a protocol.

[0051] In some embodiments of the description, determining whether to perform a power ramp based on network device configuration information includes: in response to receiving configuration information or in response to receiving configuration information that indicates to the UE that it should perform a power ramp, determining that the power ramp should be performed; or in response to not receiving configuration information or in response to receiving configuration information that indicates to the UE that it should not perform a power ramp, determining that the power ramp should not be performed.

[0052] The configuration information sent to the UE by the network device may directly contain dedicated configuration information indicating whether the UE performs power ramping or not, or it may be other configuration information sent by the network device, which Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 15 / 90 / 37, can be reused to implicitly indicate whether the UE performs the power ramp or not. That is, when the PRACH retransmission is initiated, if the UE receives network device configuration information or the received configuration information contains information indicating that the UE should perform the power ramp, the UE determines whether to perform the power ramp. If the UE does not receive network device configuration information or the received configuration information does not contain information indicating to the UE that it should perform the power ramp, the UE will determine not to perform the power ramp.

[0053] It is understood that in R15, there is only one PRACH transmission within a RACH attempt. If the transmission power of the PRACH transmission is reduced or the PRACH transmission is canceled due to power allocation, it is determined that the power ramp will not be performed when initiating the PRACH retransmission.

[0054] In scenarios where the R18 CE WI considers the introduction of a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, power allocation may cause reduced transmission power of one or more PRACH transmissions and / or cancellation of one or more PRACH transmissions among the plurality of PRACH transmissions, the solution in the mode may be adopted. Based on configuration information or indication from the network device, it is possible to determine whether the power ramp should be performed when a given PRACH transmission is canceled or its transmission power is reduced.

[0055] In one embodiment of the description, the configuration information sent by the network device may also carry a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions. It should be understood that in some optional implementations, the threshold P may be carried by other messages, which is not limited to the description.

[0056] The threshold P of the numerical count of PRACH transmissions Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 16 / 90 / 37 includes: a Q threshold for a numerical count of transmission power reduction and / or a K threshold for a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation. The UE can make a decision on whether to perform the power ramp on the next RACH attempt based on the Q and / or K configured by the network device. For example, when a PRACH transmission cancellation numerical count exceeds K, the power ramp will not be performed for the next RACH attempt, i.e., the power ramp counter pauses its increment at 1.

[0057] In some embodiments of the description, determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the protocol includes: in the event of a first event agreed upon in the protocol, determining whether to perform the power ramp.

[0058] The first event is: for PRACH transmission plurality, less than or equal to am PRACH transmissions are reduced in transmission power or cancelled due to a power allocation, om is less than a numerical count n of transmissions for PRACH transmission plurality determined by the UE, eom is agreed in the protocol.

[0059] For example, if there are four PRACH transmissions in a PRACH attempt, the numerical count n of transmissions for the four PRACH transmissions will be 8. For the numerical count n of transmissions for the four PRACH transmissions, less than or equal to am, the PRACH transmissions are reduced in transmission power or canceled due to a power allocation (including 1, 2, 3, ... m PRACH transmissions), om is less than on, that is, 8. That is, when 1 <m<8, ocorre o primeiro evento acordado no protocolo, e é determinado realizar a rampa de potência durante a retransmissão do PRACH, ou seja, o número de contagem do contador de rampa de potência é incrementado em 1.

[0060] In an optional embodiment of the description, the method includes Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, p. 17 / 90 / 37 still: receive a candidate numerical count of transmissions for the plurality of PRACH transmissions sent by the network device; and determine on based on the candidate numerical count of transmissions.

[0061] In detail, a dataset configured by the network device for the UE includes a plurality of candidate numerical counts of transmissions. By comparing the received power of the measured reference signal with various thresholds, the UE can determine the on. For example, the data includes 2, 4, and 8, and the received power of the measured reference signal is within a third threshold interval, so it is determined that on is 8.

[0062] It should be noted that, in some implementations, the UE may still determine whether the first event agreed upon in the protocol occurs after determining the execution of the power ramp based on the network device configuration information. If the first event agreed upon in the protocol occurs, the UE determines whether to execute the power ramp. Or, if the UE does not receive the configuration information sent by the network device, it needs to determine whether the first event agreed upon in the protocol occurs and, if the first event agreed upon in the protocol occurs, the UE determines whether to execute the power ramp.

[0063] In some embodiments of the description, determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the protocol includes: in the event of a second event agreed upon in the protocol, determining whether to perform the power ramp.

[0064] The second event is: for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, at least one PRACH transmission is reduced in transmission power or canceled due to power allocation.

[0065] For example, if the numerical count of transmissions for the plurality of transmissions PRACH is n, and the numerical count of transmissions whose transmission power was reduced or canceled due to Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 18 / 90 / 37 power allocation for m, then when 1 <m<n, é determinado que a rampa de potência não será realizada, o que significa que o contador de rampa de potência pausará o incremento em 1.

[0066] It should be noted that, in some implementations, the UE may further determine whether the second event agreed upon by the protocol occurs after determining whether the power ramp will not be performed based on the network device's configuration information, and determine whether the power ramp will not be performed if the second event agreed upon by the protocol occurs. Or the UE may determine whether the second event agreed upon by the protocol occurs if it does not receive the configuration information sent by the network device, and determine whether the power ramp will not be performed if the second event agreed upon by the protocol occurs.

[0067] In conclusion, according to the power ramp determination method described, for the plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, when the transmission power of one or more PRACH transmissions is reduced and / or one or more PRACH transmissions are cancelled, it becomes clear how the UE performs the power ramp in subsequent RACH attempts.

[0068] Figure 3 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining power ramp according to an embodiment of the description. The method is performed by a UE. Based on the embodiment in Figure 1 and / or the embodiment in Figure 2, as illustrated in Figure 3, the method includes the following steps.

[0069] In step S301 for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions is determined based on configuration information from a network device or based on a protocol.

[0070] In the description modality, the UE determines the P threshold for the numerical count of PRACH transmissions based on the information from Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 19 / 90 / 37 network device configuration. OP can be sent by the network device independently, or P can be carried in the configuration information sent by the network device and sent along with the information indicating whether the UE performs power ramping or not. The UE can also determine the P threshold of the PRACH transmission numerical count based on the protocol, which is not limited by the description.

[0071] OP can be a fixed value, or P=N / 2, P=N-offset, offset=1 / 2 / N / N-1, which is not limited in the description.

[0072] In step S302, a numerical count p of PRACH transmissions is determined in the event of a third event for the plurality of PRACH transmissions.

[0073] The third event is a transmission power of a PRACH transmission that is reduced or a PRACH transmission is cancelled due to a power allocation.

[0074] In step S303, it is determined whether to perform the power ramp based on a relationship between P and p.

[0075] That is, in a case where the transmission power of a PRACH transmission is reduced or a PRACH transmission is cancelled due to a power allocation, the UE can determine whether to perform the power ramp by comparing the threshold P of the numerical count of PRACH transmissions with the numerical count p of PRACH transmissions in a case where the transmission power of a PRACH transmission is reduced or a PRACH transmission is cancelled due to a power allocation.

[0076] In some embodiments, an optional implementation of step S303 includes: in one case p<P, determinar realizar a rampa de potência; ou em um caso p> P, determine whether or not to perform the power ramp.

[0077] That is, when P is less than or equal to P, PRACH transmissions are reduced in transmission power or cancelled due to a Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 20 / 90 / 37 power allocation, it is determined that the power ramp will be performed, and the power ramp counter count is increased by 1. If there is more than P, PRACH transmissions are reduced in transmission power or canceled due to a power allocation, it is determined that the power ramp will not be performed, and the power ramp counter pauses its increment at 1.

[0078] In some embodiments, P includes a threshold Q of a numerical count of reduced transmission power and a threshold K of a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation, and P includes a numerical count q of PRACH transmissions with reduced transmission powers due to power allocation for PRACH plurality transmissions and a numerical count k of PRACH transmissions cancelled due to power allocation for PRACH plurality transmissions, an optional implementation of step S303 includes: in a case k <K e q<Q, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso k> K or q>Q, determine the non-realization of the power ramp. An optional implementation of step S303 includes: in a case k <K e q<Q, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso k> If K or q > Q, determine whether the power ramp will not occur.

[0079] In other words, the optional implementation separates two scenarios of PRACH transmission power reduction and PRACH transmission cancellation, and determines whether to perform the power ramp based on two thresholds: Q and K. In a case q > <Q e k<K, é determinado realizar a rampa de potência, e o número de contagem do contador de rampa de potência é aumentado em 1. Em um caso k>K or q > Q, it is determined that the power ramp should not be performed, and the power ramp counter pauses its increment at 1.< / q>

[0080] In some embodiments, when P includes the Q threshold of a numerical count of transmission power reduction and the K threshold ​Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 21 / 90 / 37 of a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation, eop includes the numerical count q of PRACH transmissions with reduced transmission power due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions and the numerical count k of PRACH transmissions canceled due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, another optional implementation of step S303 includes: in a case p <P, q<Q e k<K, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso em que qualquer um dentre p> If P, q>Q and k>K are satisfied, determine if the power ramp does not occur.

[0081] In other words, the mode determines whether to perform the power ramp based on three thresholds, including P, Q, and K. In a case where q <Q e k<K e p=q+k<P, é determinado realizar a rampa de potência, e o número de contagem do contador de rampa de potência é aumentado em 1. Caso contrário, quando qualquer um dentre p>> P, q > Q, and k > K is satisfied, it will be determined not to perform the power ramp, and the power ramp counter will pause its increment at 1.< / q>

[0082] It should be noted that the modality described can be implemented independently or in combination with the modality shown in Figure 2. For example, after determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the network device configuration information, the UE still needs to determine whether to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between opeo P, which is not limited in the description. ​

[0083] In conclusion, according to the power ramp determination method described, it is clear that the UE determines P based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol and then determines op, in order to determine whether to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between opeo P.

[0084] Figure 4 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a power ramp according to one embodiment of Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 22 / 90 / 37 description. The method is performed by a network device. As illustrated in Figure 4, the method includes the following steps. In the embodiment of the description, the network device includes, but is not limited to, a switch, a router, a bridge, a hub, a connection port, a NIC, a WAP, and a base station, which is not limited in the description.

[0085] In step S401, configuration information is sent to a UE.

[0086] The configuration information carries information that indicates whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

[0087] In the modality of the description, the UE includes, but is not limited to, a smart UE, a mobile phone, a wireless device, an appliance, a mobile unit, a vehicle and a vehicle-mounted device, which is not limited in the description.

[0088] In the description mode, configuration information can be carried in an RRC signal or in a DCI field. For example, it can be configured directly in the RRC signal or it can be carried in the DCI field as some dynamic indications.

[0089] In detail, corresponding to the mode in figure 2, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the network device sends configuration information to the UE, so that the UE can determine whether to execute the power ramp based on the network device's configuration information.

[0090] Configuration information can be implicit or explicit. If the configuration information is explicit, for example, when the indication information in the configuration information sent by the network device is 1, this indicates that the UE should perform the power ramp, and if the indication information is 0, this indicates that the UE should not perform the power ramp. If the configuration information is implicit, for example, if the information of Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 23 / 90 / 37 configuration is not received, or if the configuration information contains information that indicates to the UE not to perform the power ramp, it is determined that the power ramp will not be performed.

[0091] In one embodiment of the description, the configuration information sent by the network device may carry a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions, or P is sent to the UE by the network device independently. Correspondingly, in the embodiment in Figure 3, the UE can determine P by receiving the configuration information sent by the network device.

[0092] In some modes, the method also includes: sending a candidate numerical count of transmissions to the PRACH transmission plurality.

[0093] The candidate numerical count of transmissions is used to assist the EU in determining the n.

[0094] In detail, corresponding to the mode in figure 2, the network device sends a plurality of candidate numerical counts of transmissions for the PRACH plurality of transmissions to the UE, the UE receives the plurality of candidate numerical counts of transmissions for the PRACH plurality of transmissions sent by the network device and determines on based on the plurality of candidate numerical counts of transmissions.

[0095] In conclusion, according to the power ramp determination method described, the network device sends configuration information to the UE, in which the configuration information carries information indicating whether the UE performs the power ramp or not, so that the UE can determine whether to perform the power ramp based on the configuration information, which proposes a power ramp mechanism for a plurality of PRACH transmissions.

[0096] Figure 5 is an interactive schematic diagram of a Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 24 / 90 / 37, power ramp determination method according to an embodiment of the description. As illustrated in Figure 5, the embodiment refers to the data / signaling interaction between a network device and a UE in the process of executing the power ramp determination method. Based on the embodiments in Figures 1 to 4, the method includes the following steps.

[0097] In step S501, the network device sends configuration information to the UE.

[0098] The configuration information carries information that indicates whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

[0099] In step S502, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the UE determines whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on a protocol.

[00100] In one embodiment of the description, determining whether to perform a power ramp based on network device configuration information includes: in response to receiving configuration information or in response to receiving configuration information that indicates to the UE that it should perform a power ramp, determining that the power ramp should be performed; or in response to not receiving configuration information or in response to receiving configuration information that indicates to the UE that it should not perform a power ramp, determining that the power ramp should not be performed.

[00101] In one embodiment of the description, determining whether to perform a power ramp based on the protocol includes: in the event of a first event agreed upon in the protocol, determining whether to perform a power ramp; where the first event is: for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, less than or equal to am PRACH transmissions are reduced in transmission power or canceled due to an allocation. Petition 870250103869, dated 13 / 11 / 2025, p. 25 / 90 / 37 of power, om is less than a numerical count n of transmissions for the plurality of PRACH transmissions determined by the EU, eom is agreed in the protocol.

[00102] In one embodiment of the description, in the method above, the network device sends a plurality of candidate numerical counts of transmissions for the PRACH plurality of transmissions to the UE, the UE receives the candidate numerical counts of transmissions for the PRACH plurality of transmissions sent by the network device and determines on based on the candidate numerical counts of transmissions.

[00103] In one embodiment of the description, determining whether or not to perform the power ramp based on the protocol includes: in the event of a second event agreed upon in the protocol, determining whether or not to perform the power ramp, where the second event is: for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, at least one PRACH transmission is reduced in transmission power or canceled due to power allocation.

[00104] In one embodiment of the description, determining whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol includes: determining a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol; determining a numerical count p of PRACH transmissions in the event of a third event occurring for the plurality of PRACH transmissions; determining whether to perform the power ramp based on a relationship between P and op; wherein the third event is a transmission power of a PRACH transmission that is reduced or a PRACH transmission that is canceled due to a power allocation.

[00105] In one embodiment of the description, in the method above, the network device sends the threshold P of the numerical count of PRACH transmissions to the UE. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 26 / 90 / 37

[00106] In one embodiment of the description, determining whether or not to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between P and eop includes: in one case p<P, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso p> P, determine if the power ramp does not occur.

[00107] In one embodiment of the description, P includes a threshold Q of a numerical count of reduced transmission power and a threshold K of a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation, op includes a numerical count q of PRACH transmissions with reduced transmission powers due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions and a numerical count k of PRACH transmissions cancelled due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, and determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between opeo P, includes: in one case k <K e q<Q, determinar realizar a rampa de potência; ou em um caso k > If K or q > Q, determine whether to perform the power ramp.

[00108] In one embodiment of the description, P includes threshold Q, a numerical count of reduced transmission power, and threshold K, a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation; and op includes the numerical count q of PRACH transmissions with reduced transmission power due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions and the numerical count k of PRACH transmissions canceled due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions; and determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between op and P includes: in one case p <P, q<Q e k<K, determinar realizar a rampa de potência; ou no caso de qualquer um dentre p> If P, q>Q and k>K are satisfied, determine whether the power ramp should not be performed.

[00109] It should be understood that step S501 above is an optional step. In some modes, the UE may determine whether to perform the power ramp based solely on the protocol. At this time, the Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 27 / 90 / 37: network device does not need to send configuration information to the UE.

[00110] The principle of the modality above is the same as the modalities described in figures 1 to 4, and the related description may refer to figures 1 to 4, which will not be repeated here.

[00111] In conclusion, according to the power ramp determination method provided by the description modality, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the UE determines whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol. The description proposes a power ramp mechanism for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, which clarifies the UE behavior while ensuring PRACH coverage.

[00112] In the above embodiments provided by the description, the methods provided by the embodiments of the description are introduced from the perspectives of the network device and the UE, respectively. To perform the functions in the methods provided by the embodiments of the description, the network device and the UE may include a hardware structure and a software module, and the above functions are performed in the form of the hardware structure, the software module, or a combination of the hardware structure and the software module. A given function of the above functions may be implemented in the hardware structure, in the software module, or in a combination of the hardware structure and the software module.

[00113] Corresponding to the power ramp determination method provided in the embodiment above, the description also provides a power ramp determination apparatus. As the power ramp determination apparatus provided in the embodiment of the description corresponds to the power ramp determination method provided in Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 28 / 90 / 37 modality above, the implementations of the power ramp determination method are also applicable to the power ramp determination apparatus provided in the modality, which will not be described in detail in the modality.

[00114] Figure 6 is a schematic block diagram of a 600 power ramp determination apparatus according to one embodiment of the description. The 600 apparatus can be configured in a UE.

[00115] As illustrated in figure 6, device 600 includes: a determination module 610, configured to, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, determine whether to perform the power ramp based on configuration information from a network device or based on a protocol.

[00116] With the power ramp determination device provided by the description modality, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, it determines whether to perform the power ramp based on the network device configuration information or based on the protocol, which clarifies the UE behavior while ensuring PRACH coverage.

[00117] In some embodiments, as shown in figure 7, the device 600 also includes: a receiving module 620, configured to receive configuration information sent by the network device, in which the configuration information carries information indicating whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

[00118] In some modes, the determination module 610 is further configured to: in response to receiving configuration information or in response to receiving configuration information that indicates to the UE that it should perform the power ramp, determine the execution of the power ramp; or in response to not receiving configuration information or in response to Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 29 / 90 / 37 configuration information that does not carry information indicating to the UE that it should perform the power ramp, determine that the power ramp should not be performed.

[00119] In some modes, the determination module 610 is further configured to: in the event of a first event agreed upon in the protocol, determine whether a power ramp should be performed; where the first event is: for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, less than or equal to am PRACH transmissions are reduced in transmission power or canceled due to a power allocation, om is less than a numerical count n of transmissions for the plurality of PRACH transmissions determined by the UE, eom is agreed upon in the protocol.

[00120] In some embodiments, the 620 receiving module is further configured to: receive a plurality of candidate numeric counts of transmissions for the plurality of PRACH transmissions sent by the network device; and determine on based on the plurality of candidate numeric counts of transmissions.

[00121] In some modes, the determination module 610 is further configured to: in the event of a second event agreed upon in the protocol, determine that the power ramp is not performed, where the second event is: for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, at least one PRACH transmission is reduced in transmission power or canceled due to power allocation.

[00122] In some embodiments, the determination module 610 is further configured to: determine a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol; determine a numerical count p of PRACH transmissions in the event of a third event for the plurality of PRACH transmissions; determine whether a power ramp should be performed based on a relationship between P and op; wherein the Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, p. 30 / 90 / 37, the third event is a transmission power of a PRACH transmission that is reduced or a PRACH transmission that is canceled due to a power allocation.

[00123] In some embodiments of the description, determining whether or not to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between P and eop includes: in one case p<P, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso p> P, determine if the power ramp does not occur.

[00124] In some embodiments, P includes a threshold Q of a numerical count of reduced transmission power and a threshold K of a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation, and P includes a numerical count q of PRACH transmissions with reduced transmission powers due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions and a numerical count k of PRACH transmissions cancelled due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, and determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between P and P includes: in one case k <K e q<Q, determinar realizar a rampa de potência; ou em um caso k > If K or q > Q, determine whether to perform the power ramp.

[00125] In some embodiments, P includes a threshold Q of a numerical count of reduced transmission power and a threshold K of a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation, and P includes the numerical count q of PRACH transmissions with reduced transmission power due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions and the numerical count k of PRACH transmissions cancelled due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, and determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the relationship between P and P includes: in one case p <P, q<Q e k<K, determinar realizar a rampa de potência; ou no caso de qualquer um dentre p> If P, q>Q and k>K are satisfied, determine whether the power ramp should not be performed. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 31 / 90 / 37

[00126] In conclusion, according to the power ramp determination device in the description, for the plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the UE determines whether to perform the power ramp based on the network device configuration information or based on the protocol. It clarifies how the UE performs the power ramp when power allocation causes a reduction in transmission power of one or more PRACH transmissions and / or a cancellation of one or more PRACH transmissions among the plurality of PRACH transmissions.

[00127] Figure 8 is a schematic block diagram of a 700 power ramp determination device according to one embodiment of the description. The 700 device is configured in a network device.

[00128] As illustrated in figure 8, device 700 includes: a 710 transmission module, configured to send configuration information to a UE, in which the configuration information carries information indicating whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

[00129] According to the power ramp determination device description, the device sends configuration information to the UE, which carries information indicating whether the UE performs the power ramp or not. Therefore, for a plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the UE can determine whether to perform the power ramp based on the network device's configuration information, which clarifies the UE's behavior while ensuring PRACH coverage.

[00130] In some modes, the 710 transmission module is further configured to: send a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions to the UE.

[00131] With the power ramp determination apparatus of Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 32 / 90 / 37 description, the network device sends the threshold P of the numerical count of PRACH transmissions to the UE, the UE determines a numerical count p of PRACH transmissions in the event of a third event occurring for the plurality of PRACH transmissions and determines whether to perform the power ramp based on a relationship between P and op, where the third event is a transmission power of a PRACH transmission is reduced or a PRACH transmission is canceled due to a power allocation, which clarifies how the UE performs the power ramp when the power allocation causes a reduction in the transmission power of one or more PRACH transmissions and / or cancellation of one or more PRACH transmissions among the plurality of PRACH transmissions.

[00132] The description also provides a communication system, which is applied to a core network. The communication system may be a long-term evolution (LTE) system, a 5G mobile communication system, a new 5G radio (NR) system, or other new future mobile communication systems.

[00133] The communication system includes a network device and an UE.

[00134] The UE is configured to implement the method in any of the modes shown in figures 1 to 3 above.

[00135] The network device is configured to implement the method in the mode shown in Figure 4.

[00136] In conclusion, with the communication system of the described modality, for the plurality of PRACH transmissions within a RACH attempt, the UE determines whether to perform the power ramp based on the network device configuration information or based on the protocol. The description proposes a power ramp mechanism for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, which clarifies the UE's behavior while ensuring PRACH coverage. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 33 / 90 / 37

[00137] Figure 9 is a schematic structural diagram of an 800 communication device provided by an embodiment of the description. The 800 communication device may be a network device, a UE or a chip, a system-on-a-chip or a processor that supports the network device to perform the above methods, or a chip, a system-on-a-chip or a processor that supports the UE to perform the above methods. The device is used to implement the methods described in the method embodiments above, with reference to the descriptions of the method embodiments above.

[00138] The 800 communication device may include one or more 801 processors. The 801 processor may be a general-purpose processor or a dedicated processor, such as a baseband processor or a central processor. The baseband processor is used to process communication protocols and communication data. The central processor is used to control the communication device (e.g., base station, baseband chip, UE, UE chip, distributed unit (DU), or central unit (CU)), executing computer programs and processing data from the computer programs.

[00139] In one embodiment of the description, the communication device 800 includes one or more memories 802 in which a computer program 804 is stored. When the processor 801 executes the computer program 804, the communication device 800 is caused to perform the methods described in the method embodiments above. In one embodiment of the description, the memory 802 can also be used to store data. The communication device 800 and the memory 802 can be provided separately or can be integrated together.

[00140] In one embodiment of the description, the communication device 800 may also include a transceiver 805 and an antenna 806. The transceiver 805 may be referred to as a transceiver unit, transceiver machine, or transceiver circuit, to perform a transceiver function. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, pp. 34 / 90 / 37 The 805 transceiver may include a receiver and a transmitter. The receiver may be referred to as a receiving machine or receiving circuit, to implement a receiving function. The transmitter may be referred to as a transmitting machine or transmitting circuit, to perform a transmitting function.

[00141] In one embodiment of the description, the communication device 800 may also include one or more interface circuits 807. The interface circuits 807 are used to receive code instructions and transmit the code instructions to the processor 801. The processor 801 executes the code instructions to cause the communication device 800 to implement the methods described in the method embodiments.

[00142] In one implementation, the 801 processor may include a transceiver to implement the receive and transmit functions. The transceiver may be, for example, a transceiver circuit, an interface, or an interface circuit. The transceiver circuit, interface, or interface circuit to implement the receive and transmit functions may be separate or may be integrated together. The transceiver circuit, interface, or interface circuit described above may be used for reading and writing code / data, or it may be used for signal transmission or delivery.

[00143] In one implementation, processor 801 can store a computer program 803, which is used to cause communication device 800 to implement the methods described in the method embodiments above when executed by processor 801. The computer program 803 can be solidified in processor 801, in which case processor 801 can be implemented by hardware.

[00144] In one implementation, the 800 communication device may include circuits. The circuits are used to implement the function of Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 35 / 90 / 37, regarding the sending, receiving, or communication in the above-mentioned method modalities. The processor and transceiver described in the description can be implemented in integrated circuits (ICs), analog ICs, radio frequency integrated circuits (RFICs), mixed-signal ICs, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), printed circuit boards (PCBs), and electronic devices. The processor and transceiver can be produced using various IC process technologies, such as complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS), nMetal metal-oxide semiconductor (NMOS), positive-channel metal-oxide semiconductor (PMOS), bipolar junction transistor (BJT), bipolar CMOS (BiCMOS), silicon-germanium (SiGe), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and so on.

[00145] The communication device in the descriptions of the embodiments above may be a network device or a UE, but the scope of the communication device described in the description is not limited to them, and the structure of the communication device may not be limited by Figure 9. The communication device may be a standalone device or may be part of a larger device. For example, the communication device may be: (1) an IC, chip or chip system or independent subsystem; (2) a collection of ICs including one or more ICs, in one embodiment of the description, the collection of ICs may also include storage components for storing data and computer programs; (3) an ASIC, such as a modem; (4) modules that can be incorporated into other devices; (5) receivers, UEs, smart UEs, mobile phones, wireless devices, portable machines, mobile units, in-vehicle devices, network devices, cloud devices, devices of Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 36 / 90 / 37 artificial intelligence and similar; and (6) others.

[00146] The case where the communication device is a chip or a system of chips may refer to the schematic structural diagram of a chip shown in Figure 10. The chip shown in Figure 10 includes a processor 901 and an interface 902. There may be one or more processors 901, and there may be a plurality of interfaces 902.

[00147] In one embodiment of the description, the chip also includes a 903 memory for storing necessary computer programs and data.

[00148] The description also provides a computer storage medium. The computer storage medium stores executable computer instructions, which are used to implement the functions of any of the above method modalities when executed by the processor.

[00149] It is understandable to those skilled in the art that various logical blocks and illustrative steps listed in the embodiments of the description may be implemented by electronic hardware, computer software, or a combination of both. Whether such a function is implemented by hardware or software depends on the specific application and the design requirements of the entire system. Those skilled in the art may, for each specific application, use various methods to implement the described function, but such implementation should not be interpreted as being beyond the scope of protection of the embodiments of the description.

[00150] The above modalities may be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, embedded software, or any combination thereof. When implemented by means of software, they may be implemented wholly or partially in the form of a computer program. The computer program product includes one or more computer programs. When loading and running the computer program Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 37 / 90 / 37 on the computer, all or part of the processes or functions described in the modalities of the description are implemented. The computer may be a general-purpose computer, a dedicated computer, a computer network, or other programmable devices. The computer program may be stored on a computer-readable storage medium or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another computer-readable storage medium. For example, the computer program may be transmitted from one site, computer, server, or data center to another site, computer, server, or data center, in a wired manner (e.g., using coaxial cables, fiber optics, or digital subscriber lines (DSLs)) or wirelessly (e.g., using infrared waves, wireless waves, or microwaves).Computer-readable storage media can be any usable media to which the computer has access, or a data storage device comprised of one or more usable media, such as a server and a data center. The usable media can be magnetic media (e.g., floppy disk, hard disk, and tape), optical media (e.g., a high-density digital video disc (DVD)), or semiconductor media (e.g., a solid-state drive (SSD)).

[00151] Those skilled in the art understand that “first,” “second,” and various other numerical figures involved in the description are used only for convenience of differentiation and are not used to limit the scope of the description's modalities or to indicate the order of precedence.

[00152] The term “at least one” in the description can also be described as one or more, and the term “a plurality of” can be two, three, four, or more, which is not limited in the description. In the description modality, for a type of technical resource, “first”, “second”, and “third”, and “A”, “B”, “C”, and “D” are used to distinguish different technical resources of the type, the technical resources described using “first”, Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 38 / 90 / 37 “second” and “third”, and “A”, “B”, “C” and “D” do not indicate any order of precedence or magnitude.

[00153] As used herein, the terms “machine-readable medium” and “computer-readable medium” refer to any computer program product, device and / or apparatus (e.g., a disk, a compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a memory, a programmable logic device (PLD)) used to provide machine instructions and / or data to a programmable processor, including machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions as machine-readable signals. The term “machine-readable signal” refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and / or data to the programmable processor.

[00154] The systems and technologies described herein may be implemented in a computing system that includes back-end components (e.g., a data server), or a computing system that includes middleware components (e.g., an application server), or a computing system that includes front-end components (e.g., a user computer with a graphical user interface or a web browser, through which the user can interact with the implementations of the systems and technologies described herein), or a computing system that includes any combination of such back-end components, middleware components, and front-end components. The system components may be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). The communication network may include, for example, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and the Internet.

[00155] A computer system may include a client and a server. The client and server are usually geographically distant from each other and interact through a communication network. The client-server relationship is Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, pp. 39 / 90 / 37 generated by computer programs running on the respective computers and which have a client-server relationship with each other.

[00156] It is understandable that the steps can be rearranged, added, or deleted using various forms of the processes shown above. For example, the steps in the description can be executed in parallel, sequentially, or in different orders, as long as the desired results of the technical solutions described in the description are achieved, which are not limited here.

[00157] Furthermore, it should be understood that the description modality can be implemented separately or in combination with other modalities, if the solution allows.

[00158] The embodiments or implementations in the description are not exhaustive and are merely illustrations of some implementations or examples and are not intended to limit the scope of protection of the description. Without contradiction, each step in an embodiment or implementation can be implemented as an independent embodiment, and the steps can be combined arbitrarily. For example, a solution after excluding some steps in an embodiment or implementation can also be implemented as an independent embodiment, and the order of the steps in an embodiment or implementation can be arbitrarily changed. Furthermore, examples or optional modes in an embodiment or implementation can be combined arbitrarily. In addition, the various embodiments or implementations can also be combined arbitrarily.For example, some or all steps of different modalities or implementations can be combined arbitrarily, and a modality or implementation can be combined arbitrarily with other optional modes or examples from other modalities or implementations.

[00159] In some implementations or modalities, the terms “in Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, p. 40 / 90 / 37 response to”, “in a case that”, “when”, “while”, “if”, etc. in the description can be used interchangeably.

[00160] In some embodiments or implementations, depending on the situation, “A or B”, “A and / or B”, “at least one of A and B”, “at least one of A or B”, “A in one case, B in another case”, “in response to one case, A and in response to another case, B”, etc., can be used to describe at least one of the following technical solutions: execute A independently of B, that is, execute A only in some embodiments or implementations; execute B independently of A, that is, execute B only in some embodiments or implementations; execute A and B selectively, that is, select A or B to execute in some embodiments or implementations; and execute both A and B, that is, execute A and B in some embodiments or implementations. The above examples are also applicable to similar cases with more ramifications, for example, a combination of A, B, and C.

[00161] In some embodiments or implementations, “including A”, “comprising A”, “used to indicate A” and “bearing A” in the description may be interpreted as directly bearing A or implicitly indicating A.

[00162] In all implementations or modalities of the description, the terms “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., do not indicate an order, but are used only to distinguish different features.

[00163] Furthermore, each element, each row or each column in the tables involved in the description can be implemented as an independent embodiment, and any combination of elements, rows and columns can also be implemented as an independent embodiment.

[00164] Those skilled in the art may notice that the algorithmic units and steps of the various examples described in combination with the Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 41 / 90 / 37 The embodiments described herein are capable of being implemented in the form of electronic hardware or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are performed in the form of hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Those skilled in the art may use different methods to implement the functions described for each specific application, but such implementations should not be considered as beyond the scope of the description.

[00165] It is clearly understood by those versed in the field to which they belong that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific work processes of the systems, apparatus and units described above may be referred to the corresponding processes in the method modalities above, which will not be repeated here.

[00166] The above items are merely specific implementations of the description, but the scope of protection of the description is not limited to them. Those skilled in the art and familiar with the technical field can easily think of changes or substitutions in the technical scope described by the description, which will be covered by the scope of protection of the description. Therefore, the scope of protection of the description will be governed by the scope of protection of the appended claims. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 42 / 90

Claims

1 / 4 CLAIMS 1. A method for determining power ramp, performed by a user equipment (UE), characterized in that it comprises: for a plurality of physical random access channel (PRACH) transmissions within a random access channel attempt (RACH), determining whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on a protocol.

2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that it further comprises: receiving the configuration information sent by the network device; wherein the configuration information indicates whether the UE performs the power ramp or not.

3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that determining whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information comprises: in response to receiving configuration information or in response to receiving configuration information that indicates to the UE that the power ramp should be performed, determining whether the power ramp should be performed; or in response to not receiving configuration information or in response to receiving configuration information that indicates to the UE that the power ramp should not be performed, determining whether the power ramp should not be performed.

4. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that determining whether to perform the power ramp based on the protocol comprises: in the event of a first event agreed upon in the protocol, Petition 870250103869, dated 13 / 11 / 2025, page 43 / 90 2 / 4 determining the performance of the power ramp; wherein the first event is: for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, less than or equal to am PRACH transmissions are reduced in transmission power or cancelled due to a power allocation, om is less than a numerical count n of transmissions for the plurality of PRACH transmissions determined by the UE, eom is agreed upon in the protocol.

5. Method according to claim 4, characterized in that it further comprises: receiving a candidate numerical count of transmissions for the plurality of PRACH transmissions sent by the network device; and determining the numerical count n based on the candidate numerical count of transmissions.

6. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that determining whether the power ramp is performed based on the protocol comprises: in the event of a second event agreed upon in the protocol occurring, determining whether the power ramp is not performed; wherein the second event is: for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, at least one PRACH transmission is reduced in transmission power or canceled due to a power allocation.

7. Method according to any one of claims 1 or 6, characterized in that determining whether to perform the power ramp based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol comprises: determining a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions based on network device configuration information or based on the protocol; Petition 870250103869, 11 / 13 / 2025, p. 44 / 90 3 / 4 determining a numerical count p of PRACH transmissions in the event of a third event occurring for the plurality of PRACH transmissions; determining whether to perform the power ramp based on a relationship between P and op; wherein the third event is a transmission power of a PRACH transmission that is reduced or a PRACH transmission is canceled due to a power allocation.

8. Method according to claim 7, characterized in that determining whether the implementation of the power ramp based on the relationship between P and eop comprises: in one case p<P, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso p> P, determine if the power ramp does not occur.

9. Method according to claim 7, characterized in that P comprises a threshold Q of a numerical count of transmission power reduction and a threshold K of a numerical count of PRACH transmission cancellation, op comprises a numerical count q of PRACH transmissions with reduced transmission power due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions and a numerical count k of PRACH transmissions cancelled due to power allocation for the plurality of PRACH transmissions, and determine whether the realization of the power ramp based on the relationship between opeo P comprises: in one case k <K e q<Q, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso k > K or q > Q, determine the non-realization of the power ramp. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, page 45 / 90 4 / 4 10. Method according to claim 9, characterized in that determining whether the implementation of the power ramp based on the relationship between operation P comprises: in one case p <P, q<Q e k<K, determinar a realização da rampa de potência; ou em um caso qualquer um dentre p> If P, q>Q and k>K occur, determine whether the power ramp will not be realized.

11. A method for determining power ramp, performed by a network device, characterized in that it comprises: sending configuration information to a user device (UD); wherein the configuration information indicates whether the UD performs the power ramp or not.

12. Method according to claim 11, characterized in that it further comprises at least one of: sending a candidate numerical count of transmissions to a physical random access channel (PRACH) plurality of transmissions, wherein the candidate numerical count of transmissions is used to assist the UE in determining a numerical count n of transmissions for the PRACH plurality of transmissions; or sending a threshold P of a numerical count of PRACH transmissions to the UE. Petition 870250103869, dated 11 / 13 / 2025, pp. 46 / 90