Hydrophobic coating
A technology for hydrophobic coatings and coatings, applied in the direction of coatings, etc., which can solve the problems of poor self-cleaning contact angle, low characteristic sliding angle, and difficult to manufacture compositions.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0117] This example demonstrates the formulation of the hard surface treatment composition of the present invention.
[0118] Preparation of sol concentrate
[0119] A mixture of 489.10 g of ethanol and 35.19 g of TEOS (tetraethylorthosilicate from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co) was stirred at room temperature (25°C) for 30 minutes. Then 2.377 g of DTS (n-dodecyltrimethoxysilane from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd) was added to the mixture, which was further stirred for 30 minutes to ensure uniform dispersion. Then 1.70 g of aqueous ammonia solution was slowly added to the mixture with constant stirring for 30 minutes. Then 15.996 grams of water were added and stirring was continued for 2 hours. 4.68 grams of hydrochloric acid was added slowly, followed by an additional 1.62 grams of DTS. The whole mixture was then stirred for a further 2 hours. The final pH of the composition was 2.18.
[0120] Preparation of hard surface preparation products
[0121] Dilute 190 g...
Embodiment 2
[0130] This example demonstrates the formulation of compositions of the invention with various amounts of silane.
[0131] Preparation of the composition
[0132] This composition was prepared in a similar manner to the sol concentrate described in Example 1. For all samples, the pH after addition of ammonium hydroxide was 10.7-10.9 and the pH after addition of hydrochloric acid was 0.5-0.9. Table 2 summarizes the samples tested.
[0133]
[0134] *Amount is the amount of 25 wt% aqueous solution
[0135] **Amount is the amount of 38 wt% aqueous solution.
[0136] Coating Preparation and Characterization
[0137] Contact angles and sliding angles were determined as in Example 1.
[0138] result
[0139] All compositions formed clear coats. The values of contact angle and sliding angle are listed in Table 3 together with 95% confidence intervals.
[0140]
[0141] All samples produced hydrophobic coatings, whether judged by contact angle or sliding angle. ...
Embodiment 3
[0143] This example demonstrates the formulation of compositions of the invention with various amounts of hydrophobic silanes.
[0144] Preparation of the composition
[0145] This composition was prepared in the same manner as described in Example 2. Table 4 summarizes the samples tested.
[0146]
[0147] *Amount is the amount of 25 wt% aqueous solution
[0148] **Amount is the amount of 38 wt% aqueous solution.
[0149] Coating Preparation and Characterization
[0150] Contact angles and sliding angles were determined as in Example 1.
[0151] result
[0152] All compositions formed clear coats except Samples 15 and 16 where some oil spots were observed. The values of contact angle and sliding angle are listed in Table 5 together with 95% confidence intervals.
[0153]
[0154] All samples yielded hydrophobic coatings, as judged by contact angle alone. However, only samples 11, 12 and 13 produced significantly hydrophobic coatings, as judged by the sli...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| water contact angle | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| refractive index | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 