In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more clear, the technical solutions of the present application will be described in detail below. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other implementations obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of this application.
 figure 1 The schematic diagram of the process of constructing the evaluation model for the evaluation model of the performance of authorized functions and duties provided by an embodiment of this application, such as figure 1 As shown, the construction method includes the following steps:
 Step S110: Determine the evaluation index of the evaluation model based on the correlation analysis of the case situation;
 In this step, it is necessary to determine at least one evaluation index in the evaluation model of the performance of the licensing authority. For example, the evaluation index here includes: licensing approval time, the average number of license cycles for each industry/region, and the number of licenses for each industry. One or more of the post-regulatory coverage rates.
 Specifically, it is necessary to obtain case information first, for example, access or directly import initial case information data from a third party to the database, and use the obtained semi-structured data as case information data;
 After that, extract the key information from the case data and process it, and store the structured data in the database, where the key information includes industry, region, number of days for permit processing, and whether to supervise after approval, etc.;
 These structured data in the database are properly filled, and evaluation indicators are calculated. For example, the missing data in the database is reasonably filled, and some time-related derivative indicators (such as whether the legal time is exceeded, the commitment Time), post-approval regulatory coverage of various industries, etc.
 After step S110, such as figure 1 As shown, continue to step S120 to determine the index weight of the evaluation index;
 In this step, the analytic hierarchy process and Delphi method are used to determine the index weight.
 Specifically, construct the positive and negative judgment matrix according to all the evaluation indicators, that is, satisfy
 Use the Delphi method (expert opinion method) to compare all evaluation indicators in pairs to determine the importance of each factor in the positive and negative judgment matrix (the importance of factor i than factor j);
 Based on the degree of importance, the AHP analytic hierarchy process is used to sort the positive and reciprocal judgment matrix in a single hierarchy to determine the largest eigenvalue of the matrix and the corresponding eigenvector;
 The component corresponding to the feature vector is used as the index weight of the corresponding evaluation index.
 Finally like figure 1 As shown, step S130 is performed to construct an effect evaluation model for the performance of permitted functions and powers based on the evaluation index and the index weight.
 Since there are industries (or fields) and regions (such as administrative divisions), the control variable method is adopted when constructing the evaluation model of the actual licensed duty performance effect. That is, in step S130, the industry or region is the control variable, and the evaluation index and The index weight defines an evaluation function, and the evaluation function is used as the evaluation model for the performance of the permission function.
 For example, for industry A, it is necessary to calculate the average value of the performance effect of all areas of permitted functions on historical data, and the geometric mean is used to treat different regions. Similarly, for region B, the average value of the performance effect of permitted functions of all industries must be calculated. , And use geometric mean difference calculation for different industries;
 Furthermore, when the control variable is an industry, the evaluation function is defined as the number of processing days*corresponding weight+whether it exceeds the average legal processing time*corresponding weight+supervision coverage*corresponding weight+standardized results of different regions*corresponding weight; when the control variable is In terms of regions, the evaluation function is defined as processing days*corresponding weight+whether it exceeds the average legal processing time*corresponding weight+regulatory coverage*corresponding weight+standardized results of different industries*corresponding weight.
 After using the above methods to construct the effect evaluation model of the performance of the permission, the model can be used to evaluate the effect of the performance of the permission for the entered administrative license cases.
 Such as figure 2 As shown, it is a schematic explanatory diagram from the construction of the evaluation model to the evaluation of the effect of licensing duties and responsibilities.
 The present invention adopts the above-mentioned method to construct the evaluation model of the effect of the performance of the permission based on the situation of the case, which is conducive to objectively evaluating the effect of the performance of the permission, and then can provide reference and suggestions before the administrative subject makes the administrative license. An indicator that can easily lead to poor performance requires special attention. For example, when a certain area or a certain industry is likely to lead to excessive approval time, more personnel or other methods can be deployed for this type of application to speed up the approval time. At the same time, the efficiency of the evaluation of administrative licensing in a certain area of a certain area is too poor. It can focus on the four aspects of my country's administrative examination and approval system reform, namely, cancellation of examination and approval, relaxation of examination and approval, standardized examination and approval, and innovative examination and approval.
 image 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of the device for constructing the evaluation model for the evaluation of the effect of the performance of licensing duties provided by an embodiment of this application, such as image 3 As shown, the construction device 300 includes:
 The first determination module 301 is used to determine the evaluation index of the evaluation model based on the correlation analysis of the case situation;
 The second determining module 302 is used to determine the index weight of the evaluation index;
 The construction module 303 is used to construct an evaluation model for the effect of performance of authorized functions and powers based on evaluation indicators and indicator weights.
 Regarding the construction device 300 in the above-mentioned related embodiment, the specific manner in which each module performs operations has been described in detail in the embodiment of the method, and will not be elaborated here.
 In one embodiment, the present application also provides a readable storage medium on which an executable program is stored, and the executable program is executed by the processor to implement the steps of the above method.
 Regarding the readable storage medium in the foregoing embodiment, the specific manner in which the stored program executes the operation has been described in detail in the embodiment of the method, and will not be elaborated here.
 Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the construction system for the evaluation model of the permission performance performance evaluation model provided by an embodiment of this application, such as Figure 4 As shown, the construction system 400 includes:
 A memory 401, on which an executable program is stored;
 The processor 402 is configured to execute an executable program in the memory 401 to implement the steps of the foregoing method.
 Regarding the construction system 400 in the foregoing embodiment, the specific manner in which the processor 402 executes the program in the memory 401 has been described in detail in the embodiment of the method, and will not be elaborated here.
 The above are only the preferred specific embodiments of the present invention, but the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any person familiar with the technology can easily think of changes or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in the present invention. , Should be covered within the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention should be subject to the protection scope of the claims.