Dosage and administration of anti-C5 antibodies for treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis

Abstract

Provided are methods for clinical treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) using an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof.

Description

The exact boundaries of CDRs have been defined differently according to different methods. In some embodiments, the positions of the CDRs or framework regions within a light or heavy chain variable domain can be as defined by Kabat et al. [(1991) “Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest.” NIH Publication No. 91-3242, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD]. In such cases, the CDRs can be referred to as “Kabat CDRs” (e.g., “Kabat LCDR2” or “Kabat HCDR1”). In some embodiments, the positions of the CDRs of a light or heavy chain variable region can be as defined by Chothia et al. (Nature, 342:877-83, 1989). Accordingly, these regions can be referred to as “Chothia CDRs” (e.g., “Chothia LCDR2” or “Chothia HCDR3”). In some embodiments, the positions of the CDRs of the light and heavy chain variable regions can be as defined by a Kabat-Chothia combined definition. In such embodiments, these regions can be referred to as “combined Kabat-Chothia CDRs” (Thomas, T. et al., Mol. Immunol., 33:1389-401, 1996). Another exemplary anti-C5 antibody is the 7086 antibody described in US Patent Nos. 8,241,628 and 8,883,158. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises the heavy and light chain CDRs or variable regions of the 7086 antibody (see US Patent Nos. 8,241,628 and 8,883,158). In another embodiment, the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprises heavy chain CDRl, CDR2 and CDR3 domains having the sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 21,22 and 23, respectively, and light chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains having the sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 24, 25 and 26, respectively. In another embodiment, the antibody or antigen binding fragmen t thereof comprises the VH region of the 7086 antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 27, and the VL region of the 7086 antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:28. Another exemplary anti-C5 antibody is the 8110 antibody also described in US Patent Nos. 8,241,628 and 8,883,158. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises the heavy and light chain CDRs or variable regions of the 8110 antibody. In another embodiment, the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprises heavy chain CDRl, CDR2 and CDR3 domains having the sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 29, 30 and 31, respectively, and light chain CDRl, CDR2 and CDR3 domains having the sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 32, 33 and 34, respectively. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises the VII region of the 8110 antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:35, and the VL region of the 8110 antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:36. Another exemplary anti-C5 antibody is the 305LO5 antibody described in US2016 / 0176954A1. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises the heavy and light chain CDRs or variable regions of the 305LO5 antibody. In another embodiment, the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprises heavy chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains having the sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 37, 38 and 39, respectively, and light chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains having the sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 40, 41 and 42, respectively. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises the VH region of the 305LO5 antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:43, and the VL region of the 305LO5 antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:44. Another exemplary anti-C5 antibody is the SKY59 antibody (Fukuzawa T. el al., Sci. Rep., T. 1080, 2017). In one embodiment, the antibody comprises the heavy and light chain CDRs or variable regions of the SKY59 antibody. In another embodiment, the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprises a heavy chain comprising SEQ ID NO:45 and a light chain comprising SEQ ID NO:46. Another exemplary anti-C5 antibody is the H4H12166PP antibody described in PCT / US2017 / 037226 and US2017 / 0355757A1. In one embodiment, the antibody comprises the heavy and light chain CDRs or variable regions of the H4H12166PP antibody. In another embodiment, the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprises the VH region of the H4H12166PP antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:47, and the VL region of the H4H12166PP antibody having the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:48. In another embodiment, the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprises a heavy chain comprising SEQ ID NO:49 and a light chain comprising SEQ ID NO:50. In one embodiment, a patient is treated with eculizumab and then switched to treatment with the 7086 antibody, the 8110 antibody, the 305LO5 antibody, the SKY59 antibody, the H4H12166PP antibody or ravulizumab. In another embodiment, the patient is switched from an anti-C5 antibody (e.g., eculizumab, the 7086 antibody, the 8110 antibody, the 305LO5 antibody, the SKY59 antibody or the H4H12166PP antibody) to another anti-C5 antibody (e.g., ravulizumab) during the course of treatment. In a particular embodiment, the patient is switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab during the course of treatment. In some embodiments, an anti-C5 antibody described herein comprises a heavy chain CDR1 comprising or consisting of the following amino acid sequence: GHIFSNYWIQ (SEQ ID NO: 19). In some embodiments, an anti-C5 antibody described herein comprises a heavy chain CDR2 comprising or consisting of the following amino acid sequence: EILPGSGHTEYTENFKD (SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, an anti-C5 antibody described herein comprises a heavy chain variable region comprising the following amino acid sequence: QVQLVQS GAEVKKPGASVKVSCKASGHIFSNYW1QWVRQAPGQGLEWMGE J. L PGSGHTEYTENFKDRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCARYFFGSS PNWYFDVWGQGTLVTVSS (SEQ ID NO:12). In some embodiments, an anti-C5 antibody described herein comprises a light chain variable region comprising the following amino acid sequence: DIQMTQS PS S LSASVGDRVTITCGAS ENIYGALNWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYGA TNLADGVPSRFSGSGSGTDFTLTISSLQPEDFATYYCQNVLNTPLTFGQGT KVEIK (SEQ ID NO:8) . An anti-C5 antibody described herein can, in some embodiments, comprise a variant human Fc constant region that binds to human neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) with greater affinity than that of the native human Fc constant region from which the variant human Fc constant region was derived. The Fc constant region can comprise, for example, one or more (e.g., two, three, four, five, six, seven or eight or more) amino acid substitutions relative to the native human Fc constant region from which the variant human Fc constant region was derived. The substitutions can increase the binding affinity of an IgG antibody containing the variant Fc constant region to FcRn at pH 6.0, while maintaining the pH dependence of the interaction. Methods for testing whether one or more substitutions in the Fc constant region of an antibody increase the affinity of the Fc constant region for FcRn at pH 6.0 (while maintaining pH dependence of the interaction) are known in the art and exemplified in the working examples (see, e.g., PCT / US2015 / 019225 and US Patent No. 9,079,949 the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety). Substitutions that enhance the binding affinity of an antibody Fc constant regi on for FcRn are known in the art and include, e.g., (1) the M252Y / S254T / T256E triple substitution (DalFAcqua, W. etal., J. Biol. Chem., 281:23514-24, 2006); (2) M428L or T250Q / M428L substitutions (Hinton, P. et al., J. Biol. Chem., 279:6213-6, 2004; Hinton, P. et al., J. Immunol., 176:346-56, 2006); and (3) N434A or T307 / E380A / N434A substitutions (Petkova, S. et al., Int. Immunol., 18:1759-69, 2006). Additional substitution pairings, e.g., P257VQ311I, P257I / N434H, and D376V X434H (Datta-Mannan, A. etal., J. Biol. Chem., 282:1709-17, 2007) are also contemplated herein. In some embodiments, the variant constant region has a substitution at EU amino acid residue 255 for valine. In some embodiments, the variant constant region has a substitution at EU amino acid residue 309 for asparagine. In some embodiments, the variant constant region has a substitution at EU amino acid residue 312 for isoleucine. In some embodiments, the variant constant region has a substitution at EU amino acid residue 386. In some embodiments, the variant Fc constant region comprises no more than 30 (e.g., no more than 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 or 2) amino acid substitutions, insertions or deletions relative to the native constant region from which it was derived. In some embodiments, the variant Fc constant region comprises one or more amino acid substitutions selected from the group consisting of: M252Y, 8254T, T256E, N434S, M428L, V259I, T250I and V308F. In some embodiments, the variant human Fc constant region comprises a methionine at position 428 and an asparagine at position 434, each in EU numbering. In some embodiments, the variant Fc constant region comprises a 428L / 434S double substitution as described in, e.g, U.S. Patent No. 8,088,376. In some embodiments the precise location of these mutations may be shifted from the native human Fc constant region position due to antibody engineering. The 428L / 434S double substitution when used in a IgG2 / 4 chimeric Fc, for example, may correspond to 429L and 435S as in the M429L and N435S variants found in BNJ441 (ravulizumab) and described in US Patent Number 9,079,949, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In some embodiments, the variant constant region comprises a substitution at ammo acid position 237, 238, 239, 248, 250, 252, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 265, 270, 286, 289, 297, 298, 303, 305, 307, 308, 309, 311, 312, 314, 315, 317, 325, 332, 334, 360, 376, 380, 382, 384, 385, 386, 387, 389, 424, 428, 433, 434 or 436 (EU numbering) relative to the native human Fc constant region. In some embodiments, the substitution is selected from the group consisting of: methionine for glycine at position 237; alanine for proline at position 238; lysine for serine at position 239; isoleucine for lysine at position 248; alanine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, methionine, glutamine, serine, valine, tryptophan, or tyrosine for threonine at position 250; phenylalanine, tryptophan, or tyrosine for methionine at position 252; threonine for serine at position 254; glutamic acid for arginine at position 255; aspartic acid, glutamic acid, or glutamine for threonine at position 256; alanine, glycine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, asparagine, serine, threonine, or valine for proline at position 257; histidine for glutamic acid at position 258; alanine for aspartic acid at position 265; phenylalanine for aspartic acid at position 270; alanine, or glutamic acid for asparagine at position 286; histidine for threonine at position 289; alanine for asparagine at position 297; glycine for serine at position 298; alanine for valine at position 303; alanine for valine at position 305; alanine, aspartic acid, phenylalanine, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, lysine, leucine, methionine, asparagine, proline, glutamine, arginine, serine, valine, tryptophan, or tyrosine for threonine at position 307; alanine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, proline, glutamine, or threonine for valine at position 308; alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, proline, or arginine for leucine or valine at position 309; alanine, histidine, or isoleucine for glutamine at position 311; alanine or histidine for aspartic acid at position 312;lysine or arginine for leucine at position 314; alanine or histidine for asparagine at position 315; alanine for lysine at position 317; glycine for asparagine at position 325; valine for isoleucine at position 332; leucine for lysine at position 334; histidine for lysine at position 360; alanine for aspartic acid at position 376; alanine for glutamic acid at position 380; alanine for glutamic acid at position 382; alanine for asparagine or serine at position 384; aspartic acid or histidine for glycine at position 385; proline for glutamine at position 386; glutamic acid for proline at position 387; alanine or serine for asparagine at position 389; alanine for serine at position 424; alanine, aspartic acid, phenylalanine, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, lysine, leucine, asparagine, proline, glutamine, serine, threonine, valine, tryptophan, or tyrosine for methionine at position 428; lysine for histidine at position 433; alanine, phenylalanine, histidine, serine, tryptophan, or tyrosine for asparagine at position 434; and histidine for tyrosine or phenylalanine at position 436, all in EU numbering. Suitable anti-C5 antibodies for use in the methods described herein can comprise a heavy chain polypeptide comprising the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 14 and / or a light chain polypeptide comprising the ammo acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 11. Alternatively, the anti-05 antibodies for use in the methods described herein can comprise a heavy chain polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:20 and / or a light chain polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 11. In one embodiment, the antibody binds to C5 at pH 7.4 and 25°C (and, otherwise, under physiologic conditions) with an affinity dissociation constant (Kd) that is at least 0.1 (e.g., at least 0.15, 0.175, 0.2, 0.25, 0.275, 0.3, 0.325, 0.35, 0.375, 0.4, 0.425, 0.45, 0.475, 0.5, 0.525, 0.55, 0.575, 0.6, 0.625, 0.65, 0.675, 0.7, 0.725, 0.75, 0.775, 0.8, 0.825, 0.85, 0.875, 0.9, 0.925, 0.95 or 0.975) nM. In some embodiments, the Kd of the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is no greater than 1 (e.g., no greater than 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3 or 0.2) nM. In some embodiments, the [(Kd of the antibody for C5 at pH 6.0 at 25°C) / (Kd of the antibody for C5 at pH 7.4 at 25°C)] is greater than 21 (e.g., greater than 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 260, 270, 280, 290, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500, 7000, 7500 or 8000). Methods for determining whether an antibody binds to a protein antigen and / or the affinity for an antibody to a protein antigen are known in the art. The binding of an antibody to a protein antigen, for example, can be detected and / or quantified using a variety of techniques such as, but not limited to, Western blot, dot blot, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) method (e.g., BIAcore system; Pharmacia Biosensor AB, Uppsala, Sweden and Piscataway, N.J.), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (see, e.g., Benny K. C. Lo (2004) “Antibody Engineering: Methods and Protocols,” Humana Press (ISBN: 1588290921); Johne, B. et al., J. Immunol. Meth., 160:191-8, 1993; Jonsson, U. etaL, Ann. Biol. Clin., 51:19-26, 1993; Jonsson, U. el al., Bioiechniques, 11:620-7, 1991). Additional methods for measuring, for example, affinity (e.g., dissociation and association constants) are set forth in the working examples. As used herein, the term “ka” refers to the rate constant for association of an antibody to an antigen. The term “kd” refers to the rate constant for dissociation of an antibody from the antibody / antigen complex. And the term “Kd” refers to the equilibrium dissociation constant of an antibody-antigen interaction. The equilibrium dissociation constant is deduced from the ratio of the kinetic rate constants, Kd == ka / kd. Such determinations preferably are measured at 25°C or 37°C. The kinetics of antibody binding to human C5 can be determined, for example, at pH 8.0, 7.4, 7.0, 6.5 and 6.0 via surface plasmon resonance (SPR) on a BIAcore 3000 instrument using an anti-Fc capture method to immobilize the antibody. Methods for determining whether a particular antibody described herein inhibits C5 cleavage are known in the art. Inhibition of human complement component C5 can reduce the cell-lysing ability of complement in a subject’s body fluids. Such reductions of the cell-lysing ability of complement present in the body fluid(s) can be measured by methods known in the art such as, for example, by a conventional hemolytic assay such as the hemolysis assay described by Ka bat and Mayer (eds.), “Experimental Immunochemistry, 2nd Edition,” 135-240, Springfield, IL, CC Thomas (1961), pages 135-139, or a conventional variation of that assay such as the chicken erythrocyte hemolysis method (Hillmen, P. etal., N. Engl. J. Med., 350:552-9, 2004). Methods for determining whether a candidate compound inhibits the cleavage of human C5 into forms C5a and C5b are known in the art (Evans, M. et al., Mol. Immunol., 32:1183-95, 1995). The concentration and / or physiologic activity of C5a and C5b in a body fluid can be measured, for example, by methods known in the art. For C5b, hemolytic assays or assays for soluble C5b-9 as discussed herein can be used. Other assays known in the art can also be used. Using these or other suitable assays, candidate agents capable of inhibiting human complement component C5 can be screened. Immunological techniques such as, but not limited to, ELISA can be used to measure the protein concentration of C5 and / or its split products to determine the ability of an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof to inhibit conversion of C5 into biologically active products. In some embodiments, C5a generation is measured. In some embodiments, C5b-9 neoepitope-specific antibodies are used to detect the formation of terminal complement. Hemolytic assays can be used to determine the inhibitory activity of an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof on complement activation. To determine the effect of an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof on classical complement pathway-mediated hemolysis in a serum test solution in vitro, for example, sheep erythrocytes coated with hemolysin or chicken erythrocytes sensitized with anti-chicken erythrocyte antibody are used as target cells. The percentage of lysis is normalized by considering 100% lysis equal to the lysis occurring in the absence of the inhibitor. In some embodiments, the classical complement pathway is activated by a human IgM antibody, for example, as utilized in the Wieslab® Classical Pathway Complement Kit (Wieslab® COMPL CP310, Euro-Diagnostica, Sweden). Briefly, the test serum is incubated with an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof in the presence of a human IgM antibody. The amount of C5b-9 that is generated is measured by contacting the mixture with an enzyme conjugated anti-C5b-9 antibody and a fluorogenic substrate and measuring the absorbance at the appropriate wavelength. As a control, the test serum is incubated in the absence of the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof. In some embodiments, the test serum is a C5-deficient serum reconstituted with a C5 polypeptide. To determine the effect of an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof on alternative pathway-mediated hemolysis, unsensitized rabbit or guinea pig erythrocytes can be used as the target cells. In some embodiments, the serum test solution is a C5-deficient serum reconstituted with a C5 polypeptide. The percentage of lysis is normalized by considering 100% lysis equal to the lysis occurring in the absence of the inhibitor. In some embodiments, the alternative complement pathway is activated by lipopolysaccharide molecules, for example, as utilized in the Wieslab® Alternative Pathway Complement Kit (Wieslab® COMPL AP330, Euro-Diagnostica, Sweden). Briefly, the test serum is incubated with an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof in the presence of lipopolysaccharide. The amount of C5b-9 that is generated is measured by contacting the mixture with an enzyme conjugated anti-C5b-9 antibody and a fluorogenic substrate and measuring the fluorescence at the appropriate wavelength. As a control, the test serum is incubated in the absence of the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof. In some embodiments, C5 activity, or inhibition thereof, is quantified using a CH50eq assay. The CH50eq assay is a method for measuring the total classical complement activity in serum. This test is a lytic assay that uses antibody-sensitized erythrocytes as the activator of the classical complement pathway and various dilutions of the test serum to determine the amount required to give 50% lysis (CH50). The percent hemolysis can be determined, for example, using a spectrophotometer. The CH50eq assay provides an indirect measure of terminal complement complex (TCC) formation, since the TCC themselves are directly responsible for the hemolysis that is measured. Briefly, to activate the classical complement pathway, undiluted serum samples (e.g, reconstituted human serum samples) are added to microassay wells containing the antibody-sensitized erythrocytes to thereby generate TCC. Next, the activated serum samples are diluted in microassay wells, which are coated with a capture reagent (e.g., an antibody that binds to one or more components of the TCC). The TCC present in the activated samples bind to the monoclonal antibodies coating the surface of the microassay wells. The wells are washed and to each well is added a detection reagent that is detectably labeled and recognizes the bound TCC. The detectable label can be, e.g., a fluorescent label or an enzymatic label. The assay results are expressed in CH50 unit equivalents per milliliter (CH50 U Eq / mL). Inhibition, e.g., as it pertains to terminal complement activity, includes at least a 5 (e.g., at least a 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60) % decrease in the activity of terminal complement in, e.g., a hemolytic assay or CH50eq assay as compared to the effect of a control antibody (or antigen-binding fragment thereof) under similar conditions and at an equimolar concentration. Substantial inhibition, as used herein, refers to inhibition of a given activity (e.g., terminal complement activity) of at least 40 (e.g., at least 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 or 95 or greater) %. In some embodiments, an anti-C5 antibody described herein contains one or more amino acid substitutions relative to the CDRs of eculizumab (i.e., SEQ ID NOs:l-6), yet retains at least 30 (e.g., at least 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 or 95) % of the complement inhibitory activity of eculizumab in a hemolytic assay or CH50eq assay. An anti-C5 antibody described herein has a serum half-life in humans that is at least 20 (e.g., at least 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 or 55) days. In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody described herein has a serum half-life in humans that is at least 40 days. In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody described herein has a serum half-life in humans that is approximately 43 days. In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody described herein has a serum half-life in humans that is between 39-48 days. Methods for measuring the serum half-life of an antibody are known in the art. In some embodiments, an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof described herein has a serum half-life that is at least 20 (e.g., at least 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500) % greater than the serum half-life of eculizumab, e.g., as measured in one of the mouse model systems described in the working examples (e.g., the C5-deficient / NOD / scid mouse or hFcRn transgenic mouse model system). In one embodiment, the antibody competes for binding with, and / or binds to the same epitope on C5 as an antibody described herein. The term “binds to the same epitope” with reference to two or more antibodies means that the antibodies bind to the same segment of ammo acid residues, as determined by a given method. Techniques for determining whether antibodies bind to the “same epitope on C5” with the antibodies described herein include, for example, epitope mapping methods, such as, x-ray analyses of crystals of antigen:antibody complexes that provides atomic resolution of the epitope and hydrogen / deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). Other methods monitor the binding of the antibody to peptide antigen fragments or mutated variations of the antigen where loss of binding due to a modification of an amino acid residue within the antigen sequence is often considered an indication of an epitope component. Computational combinatorial methods for epitope mapping can also be used. These methods rely on the ability of the antibody of interest to affinity isolate specific short peptides from combinatorial phage display peptide libraries. Antibodies having the same VH and VL or the same CDR1, 2 and 3 sequences are expected to bind to the same epitope. Antibodies that “compete with another antibody for binding to a target” refer to antibodies that inhibit (partially or completely) the binding of the other antibody to the target. Whether two antibodies compete with each other for binding to a target, i.e., whether and to what extent one antibody inhibits the binding of the other antibody to a target, can be determined using known competition experiments. In some embodiments, an antibody competes with and inhibits binding of another antibody to a target by at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or 100%. The level of inhibition or competition may be different depending on which antibody is the “blocking antibody” (i.e., the cold antibody that is incubated first with the target). Competing antibodies can bind, for example, to the same epitope, an overlapping epitope or to adjacent epitopes (e.g., as evidenced by steric hindrance). Anti-C5 antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof described herein, used in the methods described herein, can be generated using a variety of art-recognized techniques. Monoclonal antibodies may be obtained by various techniques familiar to those skilled in the art. Briefly, spleen cells from an animal immunized with a desired antigen are immortalized, commonly by fusion with a myeloma cell (Kohler, G. & Milstein, C., Eur. J. Immunol., 6:511-9, 1976). Alternative methods of immortalization include transformation with Epstein Barr Virus, oncogenes, or retroviruses, or other methods well known in the art. Colonies arising from single immortalized cells are screened for production of antibodies of the desired specificity and affinity for the antigen, and yield of the monoclonal antibodies produced by such cells may be enhanced by various techniques, including injection into the peritoneal cavity of a vertebrate host. One can alternatively isolate DNA sequences that encode a monoclonal antibody or a binding fragment thereof by screening a DNA library from human B cells (Huse, W. et al., Science, 246:1275-81, 1989). Compositions Pharmaceutical compositions comprising ravulizumab, either alone or in combination with prophylactic agents, therapeutic agents, and / or pharmaceutically acceptable carriers are provided. The pharmaceutical compositions comprising ravulizumab provided herein are for use in, for example, diagnosing, detecting or monitoring a disorder, in preventing, treating, managing or ameliorating a disorder or one or more symptoms thereof, and / or in research. Formulations of pharmaceutical compositions, either alone or in combination with prophylactic agents, therapeutic agents, and / or pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, are known in the art. Also, provided herein are compositions comprising an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof for use in the treatment methods described herein, wherein a patient is switched from one anti-C5 antibody (e.g, eculizumab) to another anti-C5 antibody (e.g., ravulizumab) during the course of treatment. The composition can be formulated as a pharmaceutical solution, e.g., for administration to a subject for the treatment or prevention of MG. The pharmaceutical composition can include a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. As used herein, a “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” refers to, and includes, any and all solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorption delaying agents, and the like that are physiologically compatible. The composition can include a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, e.g., an acid addition salt or a base addition salt, sugars, carbohydrates, polyols and / or tonicity modifiers. The composition can be formulated according to known methods (Gennaro (2000) “Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy,” 20th Edition, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins (ISBN: 0683306472); Ansel et al. (1999) “Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems,” 7th Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers (ISBN: 0683305727); and Kibbe (2000) “Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients American Pharmaceutical Association,” 3ra Edition (ISBN: 091733096X)). In some embodiments, a composition can be formulated, for example, as a buffered solution at a suitable concentration and suitable for storage at 2-8°C (e.g., 4°C). In some embodiments, a composition can be formulated for storage at a temperature below 0°C (e.g., -20°C or -80°C). In some embodiments, the composition can be formulated for storage for up to 2 years (e.g, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 5 months, 6 months, 7 months, 8 months, 9 months, 10 months, 11 months, 1 year, 1½ years or 2 years) at 2-8°C (e.g, 4°C). Thus, in some embodiments, the compositions described herein are stable in storage for at least 1 year at 2-8°C (e.g, 4°C). The pharmaceutical compositions can be in a variety of forms. These forms include, e.g., liquid, semi-solid and solid dosage forms, such as liquid solutions (e.g., injectable and infusible solutions), dispersions or suspensions, tablets, pills, powders, liposomes and suppositories. The preferred form depends, in part, on the intended mode of administration and therapeutic application. Compositions containing a composition intended for systemic or local delivery can, for example, be in the form of injectable or infusible solutions. The compositions can be formulated for administration by a parenteral mode (e.g., intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or intramuscular injection). “Parenteral administration,” “administered parenterally” and other grammatically equivalent phrases, as used herein, refer to modes of administration other than enteral and topical administration, usually by injection, and include, without limitation, intravenous, intranasal, intraocular, pulmonary, intramuscular, intraarterial, intrathecal, intracapsular, intraorbital, intracardiac, intradermal, intrapulmonary, intraperitoneal, transtracheal, subcutaneous, subcuticular, intraarticular, subcapsular, subarachnoid, intraspinal, epidural, intracerebral, intracranial, intracarotid and intrastemal injection and infusion. In one embodiment, the antibodies are formulated for intravenous administration. An exemplary, non-limiting range for a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of ravulizumab or other anti-C5 antibodies such as eculizumab, BNJ 421, 7086, 8110, SKY59 and H4H12166PP provided herein is 600-5000 mg, for example, 900-2000 mg. It is to be noted that dosage values may vary with the type and severity of the condition to be alleviated. It is to be further understood that for any particular subject, specific dosage regimens may be adjusted over time according to the individual need and the professional judgment of the person administering or supervising the administration of the compositions, and that dosage ranges set forth herein are exemplary only and are not intended to limit the scope or practice of the claimed methods. Combination Therapy An anti-C5 antibody provided herein also can be administered with one or more additional medicaments or therapeutic agents useful in the treatment of MG. The additional agent can be, for example, a therapeutic agent art-recognized as being useful to treat MG. The combination can also include more than one additional agents, e.g., two or three additional agents. The binding agent in various embodiments is administered with an agent that is a protein, a peptide, a carbohydrate, a drug, a small molecule, or a genetic material (e.g., DNA or RNA). In various embodiments, the agent is one or more cholinesterase inhibitors, one or more corticosteroids, and / or one or more immunosuppressive drugs (most commonly azathioprine [AZA], cyclosporin, and / or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]). Methods Provided herein are methods for treating complement-associated disorder(s) (e.g., MG, e.g., gMG, e.g., gMG when the patient is anti-AChRantibody positive) in a human patient, comprising administering to the patient an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof wherein the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered (or is for administration) according to a particular clinical dosage regimen (i.e., at a particular dose amount and according to a specific dosing schedule). In some embodiments, MG includes gMG In some embodiments, gMG is characterized as including subjects or patients positive for auto-antibodies binding to AChR who continue to show marked generalized weakness or bulbar signs and symptoms of MG while receiving current standard of care for MG such as cholinesterase inhibitor therapy and 1ST or who require chronic plasma exchange or chronic IVTg to maintain clinical stability. In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered once on Day 1 of the administration cycle, once on Day 15 of the administration cycle, and every eight weeks thereafter. In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered every eight weeks after the administration cycle for an extension period up to two years (e.g., at a dose of 3000 mg, 3300 mg or 3600 mg). In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered for one or more administration cycles. In one embodiment, the administration cycle is 26 weeks. In another embodiment, the treatment comprises at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11 cycles. In another embodiment, the treatment is continued for the lifetime of the human patient. In another embodiment, a patient switches from receiving one C5 inhibitor to a different C5 inhibitor during the course of treatment. Different anti-C5 antibodies can be administered during separate treatment periods. In one embodiment, for example, a method of treating a human patient having a complement-associated disorder (e.g., MG) who is being treated with eculizumab is provided, the method comprising discontinuing treatment with eculizumab and switching the patient to treatment with an alternative complement inhibitor. In another embodiment, a method of treating a human patient having a complement-associated disorder who is being treated with ravulizumab is provided, the method comprising discontinuing treatment with ravulizumab and switching the patient to treatment with an alternative complement inhibitor. Exemplary' alternative complement inhibitors include, but are not limited to antibodies or antigen binding fragments thereof, small molecules, polypeptides, polypeptide analogs, peptidomimetics, siRNA and aptamers. In one embodiment, the alternative complement inhibitor inhibits one or more of complement components Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9, Factor D, Factor B, properdin, MBL, MASP-1, MASP-2, or biologically active fragments thereof. In another embodiment, the alternative complement inhibitor inhibits the anaphylatoxic activity associated with C5a and / or the assembly of the membrane attack complex associated with C5b. In another embodiment, the alternative complement inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of CR1, LEX-CR1, MCP, DAF, CD59, Factor H, cobra venom factor, FUT-175, complestatin andK76 COOH. Exemplary alternative anti-C5 antibodies included, but are not limited to, (i) eculizumab, (ii), an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprising heavy chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains comprising SEQ ID NOs: 21, 22 and 23, respectively, and light chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains comprising SEQ ID NOs: 24, 25 and 26, respectively, (iii) an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprising a heavy chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO:27 and a light chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO:28, (iv) an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprising heavy chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains comprising SEQ ID NOs: 29, 30 and 31, respectively, and light chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains comprising SEQ ID NOs: 32, 33 and 34, respectively, (v) an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprising a heavy chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO: 3 5 and a light chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO:36, (vi) an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprising heavy chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains comprising SEQ ID NOs: 37, 38 and 39, respectively, and light chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 domains comprising SEQ ID NOs: 40, 41 and 42, respectively, (vii) an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprising a heavy chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO :43 and a light chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO:44, and (viii) an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof comprising a heavy chain comprising SEQ ID NO:45 and a light chain comprising SEQ ID NO :46. In another embodiment, the patient is treated with ravulizumab and then switched to treatment with the 7086 antibody, the 8110 antibody, the 305LO5 antibody, the SKY59 antibody, the H4H12166PP antibody or eculizumab. In another embodiment, the patient is switched from an anti-C5 antibody (e.g., eculizumab, the 7086 antibody, the 8110 antibody, the 305LO5 antibody, the SKY59 antibody or the H4H12166PP antibody) to another anti-C5 antibody (e.g., ravulizumab) during the course of treatment. In a particular embodiment, the patient is switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab during the course of treatment. In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered (or is for administration) according to a particular clinical dosage regimen (e.g., at a particular dose amount and / or according to a specific dosing schedule). In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered at a fixed dose that is fixed irrespective of the weight of the patient. As used herein, the terms “fixed dose,” “flat dose” and “flat-fixed dose” are used interchangeably and refer to a dose that is administered to a patient without regard for the weight or body surface area (BSA) of the patient. The fixed or flat dose is therefore, not provided as a mg / kg dose, but rather as an absolute amount of the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof. In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered at a fixed dose of 10 mg, 20 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 225 mg, 250 mg, 275 mg, 300 mg, 325 mg, 350 mg, 375 mg, 400 rag, 425 mg, 450 mg, 475 mg, 500 mg, 525 mg, 550 mg, 575 mg, 600 mg, 625 mg, 650 mg, 675 mg, 700 mg, 725 mg, 750 mg, 775 mg, 800 mg, 825 mg, 850 mg, 875 mg, 900 mg, 925 mg, 950 mg, 975 mg, 1000 mg, 1100 mg, 1200 mg, 1300 mg, 1400 mg, 1500 mg, 1600 mg, 1700 mg, 1800 mg, 1900 mg, 2000 mg, 2100 mg, 2200 mg, 2300 mg, 2400 mg, 2500 mg, 2600 mg, 2700 mg, 2800 mg, 2900 mg, 3000 mg, 3100 mg, 3200 mg, 3300 mg, 3400 mg, 3500 mg, 3600 mg, 3700 mg, 3800 mg, 3900 mg, 4000 mg, 4100 mg, 4200 mg, 4300 mg, 4400 mg, 4500 mg, 4600 mg, 4700 mg, 4800 mg, 4900 mg, 5000 mg, 5100 mg, 5200 mg, 5300 mg, 5400 mg, 5500 mg, 5600 mg, 5700 mg, 5800 mg, 5900 mg, 6000 mg, 6100 mg, 6200 mg, 6300 mg, 6400 mg, 6500 mg, 6600 mg, 6700 mg, 6800 mg, 6900 mg, 7000 mg, 7100 mg, 7200 mg, 7300 mg, 7400 mg, 7500 mg, 7600 mg, 7700 mg, 7800 mg, 7900 mg, 8000 mg, 8100 mg, 8200 mg, 8300 mg, 8400 mg, 8500 mg, 8600 mg, 8700 mg, 8800 mg, 8900 mg, 9000 mg, 9100 mg, 9200 mg, 9300 mg, 9400 mg, 9500 mg, 9600 mg, 9700 mg, 9800 mg, 9900 mg, 10000 mg, 10100 mg, 10200 mg, 10300 mg, 10400 mg, 10500 mg, 10600 mg, 10700 mg, 10800 mg, 10900 mg or 11000 mg, without regard to the patient’s weight. In another embodiment, the dose of the anti~C5 antibody is based on the weight of the patient. In one embodiment, 10 mg, 20 mg, 25 nig, 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 nig, 175 mg, 200 mg, 225 mg, 250 mg, 275 mg, 300 mg, 325 mg, 350 mg, 375 mg, 400 mg, 425 mg, 450 mg, 475 mg, 500 mg, 525 mg, 550 mg, 575 mg, 600 mg, 625 mg, 650 mg, 675 mg, 700 mg, 725 mg, 750 mg, 775 mg, 800 mg, 825 mg, 850 mg, 875 mg, 900 mg, 925 mg, 950 mg, 975 mg, 1000 mg, 1100 mg, 1200 mg, 1300 mg, 1400 mg, 1500 mg, 1600 mg, 1700 mg, 1800 mg, 1900 mg, 2000 mg, 2100 mg, 2200 mg, 2300 mg, 2400 mg, 2500 mg, 2600 mg, 2700 mg, 2800 mg, 2900 mg, 3000 mg, 3100 mg, 3200 mg, 3300 mg, 3400 mg, 3500 mg, 3600 mg, 3700 mg, 3800 mg, 3900 mg, 4000 mg, 4100 mg, 4200 mg, 4300 mg, 4400 mg, 4500 mg, 4600 mg, 4700 mg, 4800 mg, 4900 mg, 5000 mg, 5100 mg, 5200 mg, 5300 mg, 5400 mg, 5500 mg, 5600 mg, 5700 mg, 5800 mg, 5900 mg, 6000 mg, 6100 mg, 6200 mg, 6300 mg, 6400 mg, 6500 mg, 6600 mg, 6700 mg, 6800 mg, 6900 mg, 7000 mg, 7100 mg, 7200 mg, 7300 mg, 7400 mg, 7500 mg, 7600 mg, 7700 mg, 7800 mg, 7900 mg, 8000 mg, 8100 mg, 8200 mg, 8300 mg, 8400 mg, 8500 mg, 8600 mg, 8700 mg, 8800 mg, 8900 mg, 9000 mg, 9100 mg, 9200 mg, 9300 mg, 9400 mg, 9500 mg, 9600 mg, 9700 mg, 9800 mg, 9900 mg, 10000 mg, 10100 mg, 10200 mg, 10300 rag, 10400 mg, 10500 rag, 10600 mg, 10700 mg, 10800 mg, 10900 mg or 11000 mg of the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to a patient weighing > 40 to < 60 kg. In another embodiment, 10 mg, 20 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 225 mg, 250 mg, 275 mg, 300 mg, 325 mg, 350 mg, 375 mg, 400 mg, 425 mg, 450 mg, 475 mg, 500 mg, 525 mg, 550 mg, 575 mg, 600 mg, 625 mg, 650 mg, 675 mg, 700 mg, 725 mg, 750 mg, 775 mg, 800 mg, 825 mg, 850 mg, 875 mg, 900 mg, 925 mg, 950 mg, 975 mg, 1000 mg, 1100 mg, 1200 mg, 1300 mg, 1400 mg, 1500 mg, 1600 mg, 1700 mg, 1800 mg, 1900 mg, 2000 mg, 2100 mg, 2200 mg, 2300 mg, 2400 mg, 2500 mg, 2600 mg, 2700 mg, 2800 mg, 2900 mg, 3000 mg, 3100 mg, 3200 mg, 3300 mg, 3400 mg, 3500 mg, 3600 mg, 3700 mg, 3800 mg, 3900 mg, 4000 mg, 4100 mg, 4200 mg, 4300 mg, 4400 mg, 4500 mg, 4600 mg, 4700 mg, 4800 mg, 4900 mg, 5000 mg, 5100 mg, 5200 mg, 5300 mg, 5400 mg, 5500 mg, 5600 mg, 5700 mg, 5800 mg, 5900 mg, 6000 mg, 6100 mg, 6200 mg, 6300 mg, 6400 mg, 6500 mg, 6600 mg, 6700 mg, 6800 mg, 6900 mg, 7000 mg, 7100 mg, 7200 mg, 7300 mg, 7400 mg, 7500 mg, 7600 mg, 7700 mg, 7800 mg, 7900 mg, 8000 mg, 8100 mg, 8200 mg, 8300 mg, 8400 mg, 8500 mg, 8600 mg, 8700 mg, 8800 mg, 8900 mg, 9000 mg, 9100 mg, 9200 mg, 9300 mg, 9400 mg, 9500 mg, 9600 mg, 9700 mg, 9800 mg, 9900 mg, 10000 mg, 10100 mg, 10200 mg, 10300 mg, 10400 mg, 10500 mg, 10600 mg, 10700 mg, 10800 mg, 10900 mg or 11000 mg of the anti~C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered to a patient weighing > 60 to < 100 kg. In another embodiment, 10 mg, 20 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 225 mg, 250 mg, 275 mg, 300 mg, 325 mg, 350 mg, 375 mg, 400 mg, 425 mg, 450 mg, 475 mg, 500 mg, 525 mg, 550 mg, 575 mg, 600 mg, 625 mg, 650 mg, 675 mg, 700 mg, 725 mg, 750 mg, 775 mg, 800 mg, 825 mg, 850 mg, 875 mg, 900 mg, 925 mg, 950 mg, 975 mg, 1000 mg, 1100 mg, 1200 mg, 1300 mg, 1400 mg, 1500 mg, 1600 mg, 1700 mg, 1800 mg, 1900 mg, 2000 mg, 2100 mg, 2200 mg, 2300 mg, 2400 mg, 2500 mg, 2600 mg, 2700 mg, 2800 mg, 2900 mg, 3000 mg, 3100 mg, 3200 mg, 3300 mg, 3400 mg, 3500 mg, 3600 mg, 3700 mg, 3800 mg, 3900 mg, 4000 mg, 4100 mg, 4200 mg, 4300 mg, 4400 mg, 4500 mg, 4600 mg, 4700 mg, 4800 mg, 4900 mg, 5000 mg, 5100 mg, 5200 mg, 5300 mg, 5400 mg, 5500 mg, 5600 mg, 5700 mg, 5800 mg, 5900 mg, 6000 mg, 6100 mg, 6200 mg, 6300 mg, 6400 mg, 6500 mg, 6600 mg, 6700 mg, 6800 mg, 6900 mg, 7000 mg, 7100 mg, 7200 mg, 7300 mg, 7400 mg, 7500 mg, 7600 mg, 7700 mg, 7800 mg, 7900 mg, 8000 mg, 8100 mg, 8200 mg, 8300 mg, 8400 mg, 8500 mg, 8600 mg, 8700 mg, 8800 mg, 8900 mg, 9000 mg, 9100 mg, 9200 mg, 9300 mg, 9400 mg, 9500 mg, 9600 mg, 9700 mg, 9800 mg, 9900 mg, 10000 mg, 10100 mg, 10200 mg, 10300 mg, 10400 mg, 10500 mg, 10600 mg, 10700 mg, 10800 mg, 10900 mg or 11000 mg is administered to a patient weighing > 100 kg. In some embodiments, dosage regimens are adjusted to provide the optimum desired response (e.g., an effective response). In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered at a milligram per kilogram (mg / kg) dose. In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered at a dose of 0.1 mg / kg, 0.25 mg / kg, 0.5 mg / kg, 0.75 mg / kg, 1.0 mg / kg, 1.25 mg / kg, 1.50 mg / kg, 1.75 mg / kg, 2.0 mg / kg, 2.25 mg / kg, 2.50 mg / kg, 2.75 mg / kg, 3.0 mg / kg, 3.25 mg / kg, 3.50 mg / kg, 3.75 mg / kg, 4.0 mg / kg, 4.25 mg / kg, 4.50 mg / kg, 4.75 mg / kg, 5.0 mg / kg, 5.25 mg / kg, 5.50 mg / kg, 5.75 mg / kg, 6.0 mg / kg, 6.25 mg / kg, 6.50 mg / kg, 6.75 mg / kg, 7.0 mg / kg, 7.25 mg / kg, 7.50 mg / kg, 7.75 mg / kg, 8.0 mg / kg, 8.25 mg / kg, 8.50 mg / kg, 8.75 mg / kg, 9.0 mg / kg, 9.25 mg / kg, 9.50 mg / kg, 9.75 mg / kg, 10.0 mg / kg, 11.25 mg / kg, 11.50 mg / kg, 11.75 mg / kg, 12.0 mg / kg, 12.25 mg / kg, 12.50 mg / kg, 12.75 mg / kg, 13.0 mg / kg, 13.25 mg / kg, 13.50 mg / kg, 13.75 mg / kg, 14.0 mg / kg, 14.25 mg / kg, 14.50 mg / kg, 14.75 mg / kg, 15.0 mg / kg, 15.25 mg / kg, 15.50 mg / kg, 15.75 mg / kg, 16.0 mg / kg, 16.25 mg / kg, 16.50 mg / kg, 16.75 mg / kg, 17.0 mg / kg, 17.25 mg / kg, 17.50 mg / kg, 17.75 mg / kg, 18.0 mg / kg, 18.25 mg / kg, 18.50 mg / kg, 18.75 mg / kg, 19.0 mg / kg, 19.25 mg / kg, 19.50 mg / kg, 19.75 mg / kg, 20.0 mg / kg, 20.25 mg / kg, 20.50 mg / kg, 20.75 mg / kg, 21.0 mg / kg, 21.25 mg / kg, 21.50 mg / kg, 21.75 mg / kg, 22.0 mg / kg, 22.25 mg / kg, 22.50 mg / kg, 22.75 mg / kg, 23.0 mg / kg, 23.25 mg / kg, 23.50 mg / kg, 23.75 mg / kg, 24.0 mg / kg, 24.25 mg / kg, 24.50 mg / kg, 24.75 mg / kg or 25.0 mg / kg. In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered once per week, twice per week, three times per week, four times per week, five times per week, six times per week, or daily. In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered twice daily. In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered once every two weeks, once every three weeks, once every four weeks, once every five weeks, once every six weeks, once every seven weeks, once every eight weeks, once every nine weeks, once every ten weeks, once every eleven weeks, or once every twelve weeks. In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered at a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a different maintenance dose on Day 15 and every eight weeks thereafter. In another embodiment, to obtain an effective response, the anti-C5 antibody is administered to the patient in an amount and with a frequency to maintain a minimum free C5 concentration. In one embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered to the patient in an amount and with a frequency to maintain a free C5 concentration of 0.2 pg / mL, 0.3 pg / mL, 0.4 pg / mL, 0.5 pg / mL or less. In another embodiment, the anti-C5 antibody is administered to the patient in an amount and with a frequency to maintain a free C5 concentration of 0.309 to 0.5 gg / mL or less. In some embodiments, the patients treated according to the methods described herein have been vaccinated against meningococcal infections within three years prior to, or at the time of, initiating study drug. In one embodiment, patients who initiate treatment less than two weeks after receiving a meningococcal vaccine receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until two weeks after vaccination. In another embodiment, patients treated according to the methods described herein are vaccinated against meningococcal serotypes A, C, Y, W135, and / or B. Outcomes In some embodiments, treatment of MG includes the amelioration or improvement of one or more symptoms associated with MG. Symptoms associated with MG include muscle weakness and fatigability. Muscles primarily affected by MG include muscles that control eye and eyelid movement, facial expressions, chewing, talking, swallowing, breathing, neck movements, and limb movements. In some embodiments, treatment of MG includes the improvement of a clinical marker for MG progression. These markers include MG-ADL scores, QMG score for disease severity, MGC, NIF, forced vital capacity, MGFA post-intervention status, and other quality of life measurements. In some embodiments, MG-ADL is the primary score for measuring improvement of MG. The MG-ADL is an 8-point questionnaire that focuses on relevant symptoms and functional performance of activities of daily living (ADL) in MG subjects (Table 3). The 8 items of the MG-ADL were derived from symptom-based components of the original 13-item QMG to assess disability secondary to ocular (2 items), bulbar (3 items), respiratory' (1 item), and gross motor or limb (2 items) impairment related to effects from MG. In this functional status instrument, each response is graded 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The range of total MG-ADL score is 0---24. A clinically meaningful improvement in a patient's MG-ADL in one embodiment is, for example, a 3 point or greater reduction in score after 26 weeks of treatment. The current QMG scoring system consists of 13 items: ocular (2 items), facial (1 item), bulbar (2 items), gross motor (6 items), axial (1 item), and respiratory (1 item); each graded 0 to 3, with 3 being the most severe (Table 4). The range of total QMG score is 0-39. The QMG scoring system is an objective evaluation of therapy for MG and is based on quantitative testing of sentinel muscle groups. The MGFA task force has recommended that the QMG score be used in prospective studies of therapy for MG (Benatar, M. et al., Muscle Nerve, 45:909-17, 2012). A clinically meaningful improvement in a patient’s QMG in one embodiment is, for example, a 5 point or greater reduction in score after 26 weeks of treatment. TABLE 3: MG-ADL profile Items Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Score (0,1,2,3) 1. Talking Normal Intermittent slurring or nasal speech Constant slurring or nasal, but can be understood Difficult to understand speech 2. Chewing Normal Fatigue with solid food Fatigue with soft food Gastric Tube 3. Swallowing Normal Rare episode of choking Frequent choking necessitating changes in diet Gastric Tube 4. Breathing Normal Shortness of breath with exertion Shortness of breath at rest Ventilator dependence 5. Impairment of ability to brush teeth or comb hair None Extra effort, but no rest periods needed Rest periods needed Cannot do one of these functions 6, Impairment of ability' to arise from a chair None Mild, sometimes uses arms Moderate, always uses arms Severe, requires assistance 7. Double vision None Occurs, but not daily Daily, but not constant Constant 8. Eyelid drop None Occurs, but not daily Daily, but not constant Constant TABLE 4: QMG score for disease severity Qummis irMwm osaw wm into* latest Ksra®:' ____,,         --„„ Wfe _________        —   _ WMU-------- Shunto                                    ,,,,,,4^^ MW ,®a SETOSE SCGO ¢5 1 s. 3 M«W AteS [feted gassA Gss, 11-« MG ^xrsi^sstsss : rtesh IS-sS 1.40 Wdat kfesefe SWrxasil Ski ilteipW A'x-xwvJwa-j* .StKiEifsjjJeS® MMig A OSS. Wafer fl / S ea$| &Mste essK^hkig i st dim^ teiii'.tis OOrU^Esnjg iCha&sng st Oasxte: sssstew (fest KCit &teS3gi!t£dl ^seeA Swing Gw? k te« Bttae sr«i 1'jv'^etea sit t>teiA&d® at L^snMHa st «$ KtgJiS D Mttmuwtt (W;, Atts®^ te. w-w tM? Ite an GtlGstmeM (^     Sse. MG IM ^src«4<^U^^ As-m- &MA& ««. At tted    rate tw ; fetels ^39 t>44 ta^as S-M GA GA ................................. feft testS.      £e&aj@ t Write >3Ss >SS Jg-34 10^4 :> l-i Mt GA GA Hsa< lifted x$ At,         WCx S3O :wm I-® 0 les wtW®te&*A («<RW Ser, AX) as-» Q i 1«^ ^tetewtai {4^s^ma$M Sea- W avw 1-14 s WTAI. W ______________ The MGC is a validated assessment tool for measuring clinical status of subjects with MG (16). The MGC assesses 10 important functional areas most frequently affected by MG and the scales are weighted for clinical significance that incorporates subject-reported outcomes (Table 5; Burns, T. et al., Muscle Nerve, 54:1015-22, 2016). MGC is administered at Screening, 5 Day 1, Weeks 1-4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26 or ET (Visits 1-6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 17 or ET). A clinically meaningful improvement in a patient’s MGC in one embodiment is, for example, a 3 point or greater reduction in score after 26 weeks of treatment. TABLE 5: MG composite scale Ptosis, upward gaze (PE)   (141|||||)i||i|iOMi|l||||||^ Double vision an lateral     g gate, left or right (PE)                                            111 11111111® .........................................7771 Eye ctare (FE|                                             ® P i ^errvrMt^^             '  TorM apes               I ' iisessdatx                       ( . *$ex doses)                   ) ' Talking (Pt)                 ifcrol                                                                             i, ||||||||((|(jpill||||||||||®^^^^ chewing (k) | , Wt 4k          | s. Swallowing (Pt)         illl||||i)l((Ol|||®l|||||||l||||||ll pi                                    ' diet!                             i Breathing tek ta / Ext (weakest PE) (44^111111(1(01111111111^ -----------------4444444(44111111111111111^^   10141111111111110 Shoulder AM (PE       4lB4||||i|Bllililililll® Hiptalon         i44||||||)i||||^ i J OO           I S | s; ill 10          The revised Myasthenia Gravis Qualify of Life 15-item scale (MG-QOL15r) is a health-related QoL evaluative instrument specific to patients with MG (Table 6). The MG-QOL15r was designed to provide information about patients’ perception of impairment and disability, determine the degree to which disease manifestations are tolerated, and to be administered and interpreted easily. The MG-QOL15r is completed by the patient. Higher 15 scores indicate greater extent of and dissatisfaction with MG-related dysfunction. A clinically meaningful improvement in a patient’s MG-QOL 15 is a decrease in score after 26 weeks of treatment. TABLE 6: Revised MG-QOL15r scale Please indicate how true each statement has been (over the past few weeks). 1.1 am frustrated by my MG 2.1 have trouble with my eyes because of my MG (e.g. double vision) 3. I. have trouble eating because of MG 4.1 have limited my social activity because of my MG 5.My MG limits my ability to enjoy hobbies and fen activities 6.1 have trouble meeting the needs of my family because of my MG 7.1 have to make plans around my MG                  " 8.1 am bothered by limitations in performing my work (include work at home) because of my MG. 9.1 have difficulty speaking due to MG W.1 have lost some personal independence because of my MG (e.g. driving, shopping, running errands) 11. I am depressed about my MG 12. I have trouble walking due to MG 13.1 have trouble getting around public places because of my MG 14.1 feel overwhelmed by my MG 15.1 have trouble performing my personal grooming needs due to MG "     ” Not at all 0 Somewhat ! Very much 1 2 Total MGQOI--R score The Neuro-QOL Fatigue is a reliable and validated brief 19-item survey of fatigue completed by the subject or patient. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue and greater impact of MG on activities (Table 7; Gershon, R. et al., Qual. Life Res., 21:475-86, 2012). A clinically meaningful improvement in a patient’s Neuro-QQL Fatigue score is reflected in a decrease in 5 score after 26 weeks of treatment. TABLE 7: Neuro-QOL fatigue In the past 7 days... Never Rarely Sometimes Often Always NQFTG13 1 felt exhausted □ 1 □ □ □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG11 I felt that I had no energy □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG15 I felt fatigued □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG06 I was too tired to do my household chores □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG07 I was too tired to leave the house □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG10 1 was frustrated by being too tired to do the things I wanted to do □ 1 □ □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG14 I felt tired □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG02 I had to limit my social activity' because I was tired □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG01 I needed help doing my usual activities because of my fatigue □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG03 I needed to sleep during the day □ 1 □ 2 □ □ 4 □ NQFTG04 I had trouble starting things because I was too tired □ 1 □ □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG05 I had trouble firtishing tilings because I was too tired □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG08 1 was too tired to take a short walk □ 1 □ □ □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG09 I was too tired to eat □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG12 I was so tired that I needed to rest during the day □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG16 I felt weak all over □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG17 I needed help doing my usual activities because of weakness □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG18 I had to limit my social activity' because I was physically weak □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 NQFTG20 1 had to force myself to get up and do □ □ □ □ □ things because I was physically too weak 1 3 4 5 The Euro Quality of Life-5L (EQ-5D-5L) is a self-assessed, health-related QoL questionnaire (Figures 3A, 3B and 3C). The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive scale (Figure 3B) system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (Figure 3C). The scale measures QoL on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, paim'discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each level is rated on a scale that describes the degree of problems in that area (e.g., I have no problems walking about, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or unable to walk). The patient is asked to indicate his / her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient’s health state. A clinically meaningful improvement in a patient’s EQ 5D is reflected as a decrease in scores in each category after 26 weeks of treatment. This tool also has an overall health scale (EQ VAS) where the rater selects a number between 1 - 100 to describe the condition of their health, 100 being the best imaginable. The EQ VAS records the patient’s self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labeled ‘The best health you can imagine’ and ‘The worst health you can imagine. ’ The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient’s own judgement. A clinically meaningful improvement in a patient’s EQ VAS is reflected as an increase in score after 26 weeks of treatment. Convergent validity was demonstrated by a correlation between EQ-5D-5L and the dimensions of World Health Organization 5 Well Being questionnaires, (r = 0.43, p<0.001) (see, Janssen, M. etal., Qual. Life Res., 22:1717-27, 2013). The EQ-5D-5L approach is reliable, average test-retest reliability using interclass coefficients with mean of 0.78 and 0.73 (Brooks, R., Health Policy, 37:53-72, 1996; Chaudhury, C. etal., Biochemistry, 45:4983-90, 2006). Subjects with increasingly severe MG can suffer from potentially fatal respiratory complications including profound respiratory muscle weakness. Respiratory function is monitored closely for evidence of respiratory failure in MG subjects and ventilator support is recommended in the event of consistent declines in serial measurements of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) or NIF, loss of upper airway integrity (difficulty handling oral secretions, swallowing, or speaking) or in the setting of emerging respiratory failure. FVC as one of the test items in QMG is performed when QMG is performed. NIF was performed using the NIF 5 Meter. The MG clinical state is assessed using the MGFA Post-Intervention Status (MGFA-PIS). Change in status categories of Improved, Unchanged, Worse, Exacerbation and Died of MG as well as the Minimal Manifestation (MM) can be assessed (Table 8). TABLE 8: MGFA-PIS Complete Stable Remission (CSR) The patient has bad r» symptoms or signs of MG for ai .least 1 year and has rscei red no therapy for MG during that time. There is no weabness of any wade on eorefoi examination by someone skilfed in the evaluation of nemomuscular disease, isolated weakness of eyelid closure is accepted. Pharmacologic The same criteria as for CSR except that foe patient continues to hike sow form of therapy for Remission (PR) MG. Patterns taking ehc-shiesterase inhibitors are excluded irom this category bee aim their use suggests tits ptesstse of weakness. Minimal The patient has no symptoms of functional limiutians fc® MG but has some weakness on Manifestations exaininatiou of scute -asuss-ies. This elm recognizes that some patients wt® otherwise meet the (MM) definition of CSR or PR do have weakness that is only detectable by careful examination. MM-Q The patient has received no MG treat ment for at feast 1 year MM-I The patient cantxauea to receive some, form of imtmmcsxtppKsstott but no cholinesterase inhibitors or csther symptomatic therapy. MM-2 The patient has received only low-dose cholinesterase mhtb-itots (d 20 mg pyridosfigmine / day) for st least 1 year MM-3 Change in Stams 'i ts patient has received cholinesterase inhibitors or other syn^tomtuic therapy and some form tsi imxatmosuppressioxi during fire past year. Improved f’i) A substantial decrease m pretreatment dinteal manifestations or a sustasned substantial reduction m MG medfesiionsi as defined in the protocol In prospective studies, this should be defined as a specific decrease in QMG score. Undiatiged (U) No substantial change ms p^meatment dinieal marttiestatinns or reduction in MG medications as rielmed in the protocol In prospective studies, this should be defined in terms of a maximunt ebarige in QMG score. Worse- OV A substantial increase in pretrealmerit clinical manifestations or a substantial increase in MG medieations as defined in -he protocol in prospective studies, tiris shots Id be defined as a specific increase in QMG score. Exacerbation (£) Patiems who have folfiited criteria of CSR, PR, or MM but subsequently developed clinical findings greater that- permitted by these criteria. Died of MG (D of Patients who died t;f MG, of con^siicattons of MG ftterapy, or within 30 days after thymectomy. MG) 10 List tfe cause (see Morbidity and Morality table). Patients administered ravulizumab show a reduced MG-ADL. In some embodiments, the subjects have an initial MG-ADL score of greater than 6 points. In some embodiments, the subjects have an initial MG-ADL score greater than 0, 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 or 23 points. In some embodiments, after a course of treatment with ravulizumab, the MG-ADL score of the subject is reduced to less than 6 points. In some embodiments, the MG-ADL score is reduced at least I point, at least 2 points, at least 3 points, at least 4 points, at least 5 points, at least 6 points, at least 7 points, at least 8 points, at least 9 points, at least 10 points, at least 11 points, at least 12 points, at least 13 points, at least 14 points, at least 15 points, at least 16 points, at least 17 points, at least 18 points, at least 19 points, at least 20 points, at least 21 points, at least 22 points, at least 23 points, or at least 24 points after treatment with ravulizumab. In some embodiments, the MG-ADL score of the patient is reduced by at least 1 point after a course of treatment with ravulizumab. In some embodiments, the MG-ADL of the patient is reduced by 1,2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 points after a course of treatment with ravulizumab. According to some embodiments, the course of treatment with ravulizumab lasts for 26 weeks. According to some embodiments, the course of treatment lasts for 26-52, 26-78, 26104, 26-130, 26-156, 26-182, 26-208 weeks, or more. In some embodiments, the course of treatment lasts for greater than 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156 or 182 weeks. According to some embodiments, the course of treatment lasts for greater than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, or more years. In some embodiments, the course of treatment lasts for the remainder of the subject’s life. According to some embodiments, during the course of treatment, one or more symptoms or scores associated with MG improves during the course of treatment and is maintained at the improved level throughout treatment. MG-ADL can improve, for example, after 26 weeks of treatment with a therapeutic antibody that specifically binds C5 and then remain at the improved level for the duration of the treatment, which is 52 weeks of treatment with a therapeutic antibody that specifically binds C5. One example of a therapeutic antibody that binds C5 is ravulizumab. In some embodiments, the first sign of improvement occurs by 26 weeks of treatment with a therapeutic antibody that specifically binds C5. According to some embodiments, the first sign of improvement occurs between weeks 1-26, 26-52, 52-78, 78-104, 104-130, 130156, 156-182, or 182-208 of treatment with a therapeutic antibody that specifically binds C5. In some embodiments, the first sign of improvement occurs at week I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156 or 182. In some embodiments, MG includes refractory gMG. In some embodiments, refractory gMG is characterized as including subjects or patients positive for auto-antibodies binding to AChR who continue to show marked generalized weakness or bulbar signs and symptoms of MG while receiving current standard of care for myasthenia gravis such as cholinesterase inhibitor therapy and 1ST or who require chronic plasma exchange or chronic IVIg to maintain clinical stability. In some embodiments, refractory gMG is characterized as including subjects or patients who continue to show marked generalized weakness or bulbar signs and symptoms of myasthenia gravis while receiving current standard of care for MG such as cholinesterase inhibitor therapy and 1ST or who require chronic plasma exchange or chronic IVIg to maintain clinical stability. Kits and Unit Dosage Forms Also provided herein are kits that include a pharmaceutical composition containing an anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof, such as ravulizumab, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, in a therapeutically effective amount adapted for use in the preceding methods. The kits can also optionally include instructions, e.g., comprising administration schedules, to allow a practitioner (e.g., a physician, nurse or patient) to administer the composition contained therein to administer the composition to a patient having MG. The kit also can include a syringe. Kits can optionally include multiple packages of the single-dose pharmaceutical compositions each containing an effective amount of the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof for a single administration in accordance with the methods provided above. Instruments or devices necessary for administering the pharmaceutical composition(s) also may be included in the kits. A kit may provide one or more pre-filled syringes conta ining an amount of the anti-C5 antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof. The following examples are merely illustrative and should not be construed as limiting the scope of this disclosure in any way as many variations and equivalents will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present disclosure. The contents of all references, Genbank entries, patents and published patent applications cited throughout this application are expressly incorporated herein by reference. EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1: A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ravulizumab in complement-inhibitor-naive adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis. A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study is conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ravulizumab administered by intravenous (IV) infusion to adult patients with gMG. The ALXN1210-MG-306 study schematic is shown in Figure 1. 1. Study Rationale Ravulizumab specifically binds the human terminal complement component (C5) with high affinity, inhibiting C5 enzymatic cleavage and thereby preventing the generation of the proinflammatory / prothrombotic complement activation products, C5a, and the cytolytic and proinflammatory / prothrombotic membrane attack complex, C5b-9, which are responsible for the antibody-mediated destruction of the NMJ, loss of acetylcholine receptors, and failure of neuromuscular transmission associated with gMG. Eculizumab is approved for the treatment of, for example, gMG, under the trade name Soliris'®. Like eculizumab, ravulizumab also provides essentially immediate and complete C5 inhibition, but ravulizumab further provides sustained complement inhibition throughout a prolonged dosing interval; it was specifically designed (and has subsequently been proven) to have an increased half-life relative to eculizumab. Ravulizumab therefore requires less frequent (once every 8 weeks [q8w]) infusions than eculizumab (once every 2 weeks [q2w] infusions). Given that gMG is a chronic disease with a significant treatment burden, the relative convenience of the ravulizumab dosing regimen may increase patient satisfaction and treatment-adherence, and ultimately, lead to improved health-outcomes. The enhanced pharmacokinetic (PK) / pharmacodynamic profile of ravulizumab, with fewer PK troughs than eculizumab, has the potential to improve therapeutic efficacy while maintaining a safety profile similar to that of eculizumab. The q8w dosing regimen minimizes the risk of incomplete complement inhibition. The infusion frequency is relatively low (6 infusions per year) (Figure 2), which offers the potential for improved quality of life (QoL) through fewer missed days of work or school, better treatment adherence, and improved accessibility. Ravulizumab offers a convenient dosing and immediate onset of action with effective and complete terminal complement inhibition at the end of the first infusion. The dose regimen of ravulizumab has been optimized to reduce the exposure differences across the adult body-weight range by utilizing a weight-based dosing paradigm that provides immediate, complete, and sustained C5 inhibition over the entire dosing interval. Therefore, ravulizumab minimizes the risk of inflammation, including C5a recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells as well as direct MAC-complex induced damage of the motor neural endplate (Kusner. L. et al., Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol., 4:43-52, 2008). 2. Risk Benefit Assessment Ravulizumab provides patients and physicians with an option for less frequent dosing, which allows greater access to care for those patients who may not initiate treatment on eculizumab, may discontinue eculizumab due to frequency of dosing, or who are currently receiving eculizumab every 2 weeks. Neisseria meningitidis Increased susceptibility to infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis) is a known risk associated with complement inhibition. The main risk associated with ravulizumab is the risk of meningococcal infections. Specific risk mitigation measures are in place to address this risk, as described herein. Immunogenicity Administration of any therapeutic protein, including ravulizumab, may induce an immunogenic response potentially resulting in antidrug antibodies (ADA). The spectrum of potential clinical consequences may include severe hypersensitivity-type reactions and decrease in efficacy (PK and / or PD neutralization) due to development of neutralizing ADA (Casadevall, N. et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 346:469-75, 2002; Li, J. etal., Blood, 98:3241-8, 2001). Of the 261 patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) who were treated with ravulizumab in the ravulizumab IV clinical studies, 1 patient developed a treatment-emergent ADA. Treatment-emergent AD As have been observed in 3 healthy subjects treated with ravulizumab subcutaneous (SC) and 1 healthy subject treated with ravulizumab IV in Study ALXN1210-HV-104. All ADA positive titer values were low' and negative for eculizumab cross-reactivity. There was no apparent impact of immunogenicity on the PK or PD of ravulizumab. Monitoring of immunogenicity for this study is conducted as described in Table 10 and Table 11 and as described otherwise herein. Local and Systemic Reactions Protein therapies administered IV have the potential risk of causing local (infusion-site reactions) and systemic reactions (infusion-associated reactions). Infusion-site reactions are those localized to the site of IV drug administration and may include reactions such as erythema, pruritus and bruising. Infusion-associated reactions are those that are systemic in nature and that may be immune or nonimmune-mediated, generally occurring within hours of drug administration. Immune-mediated reactions may include allergic reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis), while nonimmune-mediated reactions are nonspecific (e.g., headache, dizziness, nausea). Monitoring for these reactions is conducted as part of routine safety assessments for this study as described herein. 3. Objectives The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared with placebo in the treatment of gMG based on the improvement in the MG-ADL profile. The secondary? objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared with placebo in the treatment of gMG based on the improvement in the QMG total score. Exploratory objectives of this study are to (1) evaluate the PK / PD and immunogenicity of ravulizumab in the treatment of gMG throughout the study, (2) assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared to placebo m the treatment of gMG based on the incidence of all-cause hospitalization or Clinical Deterioration, (3) assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared with placebo in the treatment of gMG based on the improvement in quality of life measures, and (4) assess the efficacy of ravulizumab in the treatment of gMG based on other efficacy endpoints throughout the study. The safety objective of this study is to characterize the overall safety of ravulizumab in the treatment of gMG 4. Endpoints The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is change from baseline in MG-ADL total score at Week 26 of the Randomized-Controlled Period. The secondary efficacy endpoint of the study is Change from Baseline in QMG total score at Week 26. The exploratory efficacy endpoints of the study include the following: * Change in serum ravulizumab concentration over time. ® Change in free serum C5 concentration over time; ® Incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies over time; ® Incidence of ail-cause hospitalization or Clinical Deterioration during the 26 weeks of the Randomized-Controlled Period; ® Change from Baseline in the Revised 15-Component Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r) score at Week 26; 5             ® Change from Baseline in Neuro-QOL Fatigue score at Week 26; « Improvement of at least 3 points in the MG-ADL total score from Baseline at Week 26; « Improvement of at least 5 points in the QMG total score from Baseline at Week 26; 10             ® Change from Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) score at Week 26; ® Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS) at Week 26; ® Change from Baseline in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 26. 15           The safety endpoints of this study are (1) incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events over time and (2) changes from Baseline in vital signs and laboratory assessments. The objectives and endpoints of the study are summarized in Table 9 herein. TABLE 9: Study ALXN1210-MG-306 objectives and endpoints Objectives Endpoints Primary To assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared with placebo in the treatment of gMG based on the improvement in the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) profile. Change from Baseline in MG-ADL total score at Week 26 of the Randomized-Controlled Period, Secondary To assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared with placebo in tire treatment of gMG based on the improvement in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total score. Change from Baseline in QMG total score at Week 26. Exploratory • To evaluate tire PK / PD and immunogenicity' of ravulizumab in the treatment of gMG throughout the study. • Change in serum ravulizumab concentration over time. • Change in free serum C5 concentration over time. • Incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies over time. • To assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared to placebo in the treatment of gMG based on the incidence of all-cause hospitalization or Clinical Deterioration. • To assess the efficacy of ravulizumab compared with placebo in the treatment of gMG based on the improvement in quality of life measures. • To assess the efficacy of ravulizumab in the treatment of gMG based on other efficacy endpoints throughout the study. • Incidence of all-cause hospitalization or Clinical Deterioration during the 26 weeks of the Randomized-Controlled Period. •   Change from Baseline in the Revised 15- Component Myasthenia Gravis Qualify of Life (MG-QOL15r) score at Week 26. •   Change from Baseline in Neuro-QOL Fatigue score at Week 26. • Improvement of at least 3 points in the MG-ADL total score from Baseline at Week 26. • Improvement of at least 5 points in the QMG total score from Baseline at Week 26. • Change from Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) score at Week 26. • Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS) at Week 26. • Orange from Baseline in Euro Qualify of Life (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 26.      ” Safety To characterize the overall safety of ravulizumab in the treatment of gMG. • Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events overtime. • Changes from Baseline in vital signs and laboratory assessments. 5. Overall Design ALXN1210-MG-306 is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ravulizumab for the 5 treatment of patients with gMG. The ALXN1210-MG-306 study schematic is shown in Figure 1. Approximately 160 eligible patients are stratified by region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Japan) and randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 treatment groups: (1) ravulizumab infusion or (2) placebo infusion. There are 3 periods in this study: Screening Period, Randomized-Controlled Period, and an Open-Label Extension (OLE) Period. 10          After the 26-Week Randomized-Controlled Period and assessments on Day 183 (Week 26), patients in the placebo group receive a blinded loading dose of ravulizumab and patients in the ravulizumab group receive a blinded ravulizumab dose of 900 mg. Starting Week 28, all patients begin open-label ravulizumab maintenance doses q8w. For patients in the ravulizumab group, a blinded ravulizumab dose of 900 mg is chosen to ensure maintenance of complete C5 15 inhibition until the next scheduled maintenance dose at Week 28 (Day 197). Eight weeks after the final dose of study drug is administered, all enrolled patients return for an End of Study (EOS) Visit (Visit 30) at Week 132 (± 2 days) during which final study assessments are conducted. If a patient withdraws from the study, or completes the study early (prior to Visit 29; Week 124), for example if ravulizumab has become registered or approved (in accordance with country-specific regulations) prior to Visit 29, the patient is encouraged to return for an Early Termination (ET)ZEOS Visit, 8 weeks (± 2 days) after the day the last dose of study drug is administered, during which final planned safety assessments are conducted as described herein. Attempts are made to follow all patients for safety for 8 weeks from the day the last dose of study drug is administered. Patients who are being treated with an 1ST at the time of the Screening Visit may continue taking their baseline ISTs throughout the Randomized-Controlled and OLE Periods. The dosage of 1ST, however, must not be changed and no new ISTs may be added or discontinued during the Randomized-Controlled Period of the study, unless deemed by the Investigator to be medically necessary. Throughout the study, rescue therapy (e.g., high-dose corticosteroids, plasmapheresis / plasma exchange, or intravenous immunoglobulin) are allowed if a patient experiences Clinical Deterioration, as defined by the study protocol herein. The rescue therapy-used for a particular patient is at the discretion of the Investigator. Throughout the study, rescue therapy (e.g., high-dose corticosteroid, PP / PE, or IVIg) are allowed if a patient experiences Clinical Deterioration as defined herein. The rescue therapy used for a particular patient is at the discretion of the Investigator. The primary endpoint for this study is measured at Week 26 (Day 183). Endpoints are measured and analyzed irrespective of rescue therapy. For those patients who complete the study, as defined in the protocol, the EOS Visit is defined as patient’s last visit in the (up to) 2-year OLE Period. Including the 8-week safety follow-up, which begins after the patient’s last dose of study drug is administered, the overall study-duration for an individual patient is estimated to take up to 132 weeks (from enrollment through the end of the Safety Follow-up). The period of active patient-participation is estimated to take up to 13 2 weeks (from enrollment through the EOS Visit). Schedules of Activities (SOA) for the Randomized-Controlled Period and the OLE Period are provided in Table 10 and Table 11, respectively. Screening Period (2-4 Weeks Prior to Day 1) At the screening visit, after obtaining informed consent, the patient is screened for study eligibility through medical history review, demographic data, and laboratory assessments. The medical history review includes confirmation of MG diagnosis as defined in the inclusion criteria of this protocol, history of previous treatrnent / therapies for MG (e.g., thy mectomy, ISTs including corticosteroids, IVIg and PEZPP), history of MG exacerbation or crisis including the duration of each exacerbation / crisis, the medication taken at the time of each exacerbation / crisis, and the treatment for each exacerbation / crisis. If all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are met, patients are vaccinated against A. meningitidis, if not already vaccinated within the 3 years prior to their enrollment in the study. Patients who initiate study drug treatment less than 2 weeks after receiving a meningococcal vaccine receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until 2 weeks after vaccination. If a patient experiences a Clinical Deterioration or MG Crisis during the Screening Period, the Sponsor is notified. Following discussion with the Sponsor, a decision is made about whether the patient may continue m the study. Number of Patients Patients are screened until enough patients have been enrolled to achieve an estimated total of 160 patients, with approximately 80 patients per group. Randomization At the time of randomization, all patients are reassessed for eligibility based on the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients who are vaccinated, continue to meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria at Randomization [Day 1]), and have been cleared for randomization by the Investigator, are randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 treatment groups: (1) ravulizumab infusion or (2) placebo infusion. Patients are centrally randomized using interactive response technology. The randomization is stratified by region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Japan). Throughout the study, rescue therapy (e.g., high-dose corticosteroid, PP / PE or IVIg) is allowed when a patient’s health would be in jeopardy if rescue therapy is not administered (e.g, emergent situations), or if a patient experiences Clinical Deterioration as defined in this protocol. The rescue therapy used for a particular patient is at the discretion of the Investigator. Patients are informed of potential signs and symptoms of Clinical Deterioration or MG Crisis and instructed to contact the Investigator to be evaluated within 48 hours of notification of the Investigator of the symptom onset. At the evaluation visit, the Investigator or the Investigator’s designee perform the assessments as specified by this protocol. The Investigator 5 or designee determine whether or not the patient meets the definition of Clinical Deterioration as defined herein, and treat the patient accordingly. The primary endpoint for this study is measured at Week 26 (Day 183), irrespective of rescue therapy. Patients randomized to the ravulizumab group receive a blinded loading dose of 10 ravulizumab on Day 1, followed by blinded maintenance doses of ravulizumab on Day 15 (Week 2) and q8w thereafter, for a total of 18 weeks of treatment. Patients randomized to placebo receive a blinded dose of placebo on Day 1, followed by blinded doses of placebo on Day 15 (Week 2) and q8w thereafter, for a total of 18 weeks. Both ravulizumab and placebo are administered by intravenous infusion. 15          After the 26-Week Randomized-Controlled Period and assessments on Day 183 (Week 26), patients in the placebo group receive a blinded loading dose of ravulizumab and patients in the ravulizumab group receive a blinded ravulizumab dose of 900 mg; the 900 mg dose is chosen to ensure maintenance of complete C5 inhibition until the next scheduled maintenance dose at Week 28 (Day 197). Starting at Week 28, all patients begin open-label ravulizumab maintenance 20 doses q8w. The OLE Period for each patient commences when the patient receives a dose of ravulizumab on Week 26 (Day 183) and continues for up to 2 years or until the product is registered or approved (in accordance with country-specific regulations), whichever occurs first. The Schedule of Activities for Screening Through End of the Randomized-Controlled 25 Period is shown in Table 10 and through the Extension Period is shown in Table 11. TABLE 10: Schedule of activities: screening through end of the Randomized-Controlled period Period / Phase Screening Randomized-Controlied Period Clinical Deterioratioqj Study Visit 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 / ET Study Day »1 »8 D15 D22 »29 »57 »71 D85 »99 »127 »15 »183 Window (dav) + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 4- T + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 Weeks -4 to -2 W W1 W2 W3 W4 W8 W10 W12 W14 W18 W22 W26 Informed Consent X Assessment of Inclusion / 'Exclusion Criteria X X Medicai History X MG History X MGFA Clinical 3 Classification X X Weight X X x X x x Height x HIV- (I and 2) testing x Vial Signs &p,]jse Oximetry X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Physical Examination X X X Abbreviated Physical Examination' X X X X X X X X X X X Concomitant Medication X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Non-Dmg Therapy X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MG Therapy Status X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hospitalization Status X X X X X X X X X X X X X Adverse Event X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MG-QOL15r X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Neuro-QOL Fatigue X x X X X X X X X x x x X X EQ-5D-5L x x X X x X x X X x x X X X MG-ADL3’6 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X QMGJ’ ! X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MG(P- ! X X X X X X X X X X X X V X MGFA-PIS3 x X x X x x x X C-SSRS Baseline / Screening Version C-SSRS Since Last Visit Version X X X ECG x x AChR Ab x X x x Clinical Lab Tests* x x X X x x x Pregnancy Test X X X X X X PK, Free C5‘b B / P T / P T / P T / P T X ADA10 X X X X X X Patient Safety' Information Card'2 X X X X X X X X X X X Randomization x Study Dntg Infusion' X X X X i Evaluation of Clinical Deterioration is performed as soon as possible, within 48 hours of notification to the Investigator of symptom onset. Additional evaluation visits are scheduled at Ilie discretion of the Investigator. 2 If a patient withdraws early from the study during the Randomized-Controlled Period an Early Termination Visit is 5 performed. 3 Refer, e.g., to Table 3. 4 Vital signs and pulse oximetry include systolic and diastolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercuiy [mmHg]), pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation [SO2]), heart rate (beats / minute), and temperature (degrees Celsius [°C] or degrees Fahrenheit [°F]). On dosing days, vital signs are taken before study drug administration and after the patient has been resting for at least 5 minutes. s Are performed, if necessary', on the basis of the patient’s health status and the clinical judgement of the Investigator. 6 The MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL) assessment is performed by a Properly Trained Clinical Evaluator, preferably the same evaluator, throughout the study. The recall period for MG-ADL is the preceding 7 days or since the last visit if the visit interval is less than 7 days. 7 If a patient is taking a cholinesterase inhibitor, the dose is withheld for at least 10 hours prior to the assessment. s Clinical laboratory tests are performed at the central laboratory. 9 Pregnancy tests are performed on all patients of child-bearing potential at the specified time points. Seram pregnancy test are performed at Screening; urine pregnancy tests are performed at all other required time points. A negative urine test result is required prior to administering ravulizumab to patients of childbearing potential at the indicated visits. Additional pregnancy tests (urine or serum) may also be performed at any visit at the Inv e stigator ’ s disc retio n. io Baseline (B) and trough (T) blood samples for serum PK, free C5 (PD), and ADA are collected predose (within 30 minutes prior to the start of infusion of study drug). Peak (P) blood samples for serum PK / PD samples are taken within the 30 minutes following completion of study drug infusion. The T samples are drawn through the venous access created for the dose infusion, prior to administration of the dose. The P samples are drawn from the patient’s opposite, noninfused arm. On Day 183 (Week 26), the T sample is considered a Randomized-Controlled Period assessment and the P sample is considered an Extension Period assessment. All collection times are recorded in eCRF. In the event of Clinical Deterioration, blood samples for serum PK / PD and ADA analyses are collected if supplemental dosing is described herein. n To reduce the risk of meningococcal infection (N. meningitidis), all patients are vaccinated against meningococcal infections within 3 years prior to, or at the time of, initiating study drug. Patients who initiate study drag treatment less than 2 weeks after receiving a meningococcal vaccine receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until 2 weeks after vaccination. 12 Patients are given a Patient Safety Information Card prior to the first dose of study drug. At each visit throughout the study, the study staff ensures that the patient has the Patient Safety Information Card. is All patients that continue to meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and have been cleared for randomization by the Investigator are centrally randomized through interactive response technology (1RT). 14 Study drug is administered intravenously via infusion after completion of all other tests and procedures, excluding the peak blood sampling for PK / PD, free C5, and AD A. Abbreviations: AChR Ab = acetylcholine receptor antibody; ADA = antidrug antibody; B = baseline sample; C5 = complement component 5; C-SSRS = Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale; I) = day; ECG = electrocardiogram; EQ-5D-5L=Euro Quality of Life; ET = Early Termination; HIV = Human Immunodeficiency Virus; MG = Myasthenia Gravis; MG-ADL = Myasthenia gravis Activities of Daily Living profile; MGC = Myasthenia gravis Composite score; MGFA = Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; MGFA-PIS = MGFA-Post-Intervention Status; TV. meningitidis = Neisseria meningitidis: P = peak sample; PK / PD = pharmacokinetic(s) / phamiacodynamic(s); QMG = Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score for disease severity; QoL = quality of life; T = trough sample; W = week(s). TABLE 11: Schedule of activities: Extension period Period Open-Label Extension Clinical Deterioration Study Visit 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Study Days' »183 »197 »211 »253 »267 »281 »3h9 »365 »421 »477 »533 »533 »645 »701 »757 »813 »869 »925 / El' / EOS Weeks W26 W28 W30 W36 W38 W4t) W44 W52 W60 W68 W76 W76 W92 W100 W108 W116 W124 W 132 Window (day) ±2 ±2 ± 2 ±2 ±2 ± 2 ±2 ±2 :t 2 ±2 ±2 ±2 :t 2 ±2 ±2 ±2 ±2 Weight X X X X X x X X X x X X X X X Vital Signs & Pulse Oximetry X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Physical Examination X X Abbreviated Physical Examination X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Concomitant Medication X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Non-Drug Therapy X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MG Therapy Status X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hospitalization Status X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X AdverseEvenis V x X v x X X X x X V x X X V x X X MG-QOL15r X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X Neuro-QOL Fatigue X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X EQ-5D-5L X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X x X MG-ADI? ' v x X v x X X X x X v X X X v x X X OMG”’ $ v x X v x X X X x X v X X X v x X X X X x X X x X X X x X X X Y X X x X MGFA-PIS6 X X X X x X x X C-SSRS Since Last Visit Version X X X X X X X X ECG X AChR Ab X X X X X X X X WO 2020 / 168079                                                 PCT / US2020 / 018113 os oo Clinical Lab Tests X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Pregnancy lest X X X X X X X X X X X X X X PK, Free C51' p T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P T / P X ADA A X X A X X X A X X X X X X Patient Safety Information Card’7' X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Ravulizumab Infusion X X X X X X X X X X X X X X i Evaluation of or Clinical Deterioration is performed as soon as possible, within 48 hours of notification to the Investigator of symptom onset. Additional evaluation visits are scheduled at the discretion of the Investigator. 2 Extension Period begins at the start: of Day 183 (Week 26) dosing, 3 If a patient withdraws early from the study during the Extension Period an Early Termination Visit is performed. ♦ Vital signs and pulse oximetry include systolic and diastolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]), pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation [S02]), heart rate (beats / minute), and temperature (degrees Celsius [°C] or degrees Fahrenheit [°F]). On dosing days, vital signs are taken before study drug administration and after the patient has been resting for at least 5 minutes. 5 Are performed, if necessary, on the basis of the patient’s health status and the clinical judgement of the Investigator. s Refer, e.g., to Table 3. ? The MG-ADL is performed by a Properly Trained Clinical Evaluator, preferably the same evaluator, throughout the study. The recall period for MG-ADL is the preceding 7 days or since the last visit if the visit interval is less than 7 days. s If a patient is taking a cholinesterase inhibitor, the dose is withheld for at least 10 hours prior to the assessment, 9 Clinical laboratory tests are performed at the central laboratory. io Pregnancy tests are performed on all patients of child-bearing potential at the specified time points. Serum pregnancy tests are performed at Day 925 / ET / EOS; urine pregnancy tests are performed at all other required time points. A negative urine test result is required prior to administering ravulizumab to patients of childbearing potential at the indicated visits. Additional pregnancy tests (urine or serum) may also be performed at any visit at the Investigator’s discretion. n Trough (T) blood samples for serum PK, free C5 (PD), and ADA are collected predose (within 30 minutes prior to the start of infusion of study drug). Peak (P) blood samples for serum PK / PD are taken within the 30 minutes following completion of study drug infusion. The T samples are drawn through the venous access created for the dose infusion, prior to administration of the dose. The P samples are drawn from the patient’s opposite, noninfused arm. On Day 183 (Week 26), the T sample is considered a Randomized-Controlled Period assessment and the P sample is considered an Extension Period assessment. All collection times are recorded in eCRF. In the event of Clinical Deterioration, a blood sample for serum PK / PD and ADA analyses are collected if supplemental dosing is described herein. 12 Patients are given a Patient Safety Information Card prior to the first dose of study drag. At each visit throughout the study, staff ensures that the patient has the Patient Safety Information Card. WO 2020 / 168079                                                 PCT / US2020 / 018113 6. Standard Protocol Definitions TABLE 12: Abbreviations and definitions for the study and follow-up period Abbreviation or Specialist Terai Explanation Ab Antibody AChR Acetylcholine receptor AE Adverse event aHUS Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome ANCOVA Analysis of covariance AZA Azathioprine BP Blood Pressure C5 Complement protein 5 CMAX Maximal concentration (MIX Minimal concentration eCRF Electronic Case Report Form C-SSRS Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale ECG Electrocardiogram EDC Electronic Data Capture EIU Exposure in-utero EOT Event of Interest EOS End of Study EQ-5D EuroQoL ET Early Termination EU European Union FAS Full Analysis Set FVC Forced Vital Capacity GCP Good Clinical Practices gMG Generalized Myasthenia Gravis HAHA Human Anti-human Antibody HCG human chorionic gonadotropin HR Heart Rate IB Investigator Brochure ICF Informed Consent Form ICH International Conference on Harmonization ICU Intensive Care Unit IEC Independent Ethics Committee IVIg Intravenous Immunoglobulin G IP investigational Product IRB Institutional Review Board 1ST Immunosuppressant Therapy IV Intravenous IVIg Intravenous immunoglobulin IXRS interactive voice or web response system mAb Monoclonal Antibody MedDRA Medical Dictionary for Regulatory' Activities MG Myasthenia Gravis MG-ADL MG activity' of daily living profile MGC Myasthenia Gravis Composite MGFA Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America MM Minimal manifestation MMF Mycophenolate Mofetil MMT Manual Muscle Test MTX Methotrexate MuSK Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase NIF Negative inspiratory' force NMJ Neuromuscular junction oMG Ocular Myasthenia Gravis PD Pharmacodynamics PE Plasmapheresis or Plasma Exchange PI Principal Investigator PIS Post-Intervention Status PK Pharmacokinetics PNH Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria PP Per-Protocol Population QOL Quality' Of Life QMG Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis RR Respiration Rate RSI Reference Safety Information SAE Serious Adverse Event SAP Statistical Analysis Plan SFEMG single-fiber electromyography SOC System Organ Class TEAE Treatment Emergent Adverse Events TESAE Treatment Emergent SAE US United States VAS Visual Analog Scale WHODrug World Health Organization Drug Dictionary Clinical Deterioration For this protocol, Clinical Deterioration is defined as follows: 1, Patients who experience an MG Crisis, which is defined as weakness from MG that is severe enough to necessitate intubation or to delay extubation following surgery. The respiratory failure is due to weakness of respiratory muscles. Severe bulbar (oropharyngeal) muscle weakness often accompanies the respiratory muscle weakness, or may be the predominant feature in some patients; or, 2. Significant symptomatic worsening to a score of 3 or a 2-point worsening from Baseline on any one of the individual MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) items other than double vision or eyelid droop; or, 3. Administration of rescue therapy to a patient whose, in the opinion of the Investigator or Investigator-designated physician, health would be in jeopardy, if rescue therapy were not given (e.g., emergent situations). Unscheduled Visits Under exceptional circumstances, additional (unscheduled) visits outside the specified visits are permitted at the discretion of the Investigator. Procedures, tests, and assessments is performed at the discretion of the Investigator and efforts are made to map the corresponding data to the appropriate visit. Properly Trained Clinical Evaluator Properly Trained Clinical Evaluators are study staff who have been certified in administering the MG-ADL, QMG and MGC assessments. Only Properly Trained Clinical Evaluators administer these assessments. A Properly Trained Clinical Evaluator is a neurologist, physical therapist, or other study team member delegated by the Investigator. Only the Investigator or a neurologist performs the manual muscle test (MMT), components of the MGC, the MGFA-PIS, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Classification. Clinical Evaluator training and certification for this protocol takes place either at the Investigator’s Meeting or via the Sponsor’s designated on-line training portal. Responsibilities for Myasthenia Gravis Assessments Responsibilities for MG assessments are listed in Table 13. Throughout the study, MG assessments are performed at approximately the same time of day by a Properly Trained Clinical Evaluator, and preferably the same evaluator. TABLE 13: MG assessments and responsibilities Assessissesst                                              i Evaktaior MG-ADL______________________________ QMG Property Trained Clinical Evaluator Properly Trained Clinical Evaluator Mut..                                        ^nopeny mm cnnicai r-vaiuator MGC (MMT Components)                          I Investigator or Neurologist MGFA-PIS Investigator or Neurologist MGFA Classification                                   i Investigator or Neurologist Abbreviations: MG-ADL = Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Profile; MGC = Myasthenia Gravis Composite scale; MGFA = Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; MGFA-PIS = Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Status; MMT = manual muscle test; QMG = Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score for disease severity. Scientific Rationale for Study Design Published data support the MG-ADL profile as an established, sensitive, and objective assessment of treatment response over time in patients with gMG (Howard, J. et al., Muscle Nerve, 56:328-30, 2016). The safety parameters being evaluated are commonly used in clinical studies per International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidance. Placebo is selected as the control and patients are allowed to continue stable therapy with standard of care therapy (e.g., ISTs) throughout the course of the study, which thereby allows for comparison of the safety and efficacy of ravulizumab when administered in addition to the patient’s standard of care treatment to current standard of care therapies in patients with gMG. Given the heterogeneity of the disease and fluctuation in the severity of symptoms, there is no single international standard of care accepted, and targeted treatment with complement inhibitor drugs, such as the recently introduced eculizumab, is not yet widely available to patients worldwade and is not yet considered standard of care for all patients with gMG. A placebo-controlled study allows for the evaluation of treatment effect and allows for a double-blind design; an important study condition to be maintained when considering endpoints that includes neurological scales, which are known to be especially prone to placebo effects. The placebo-controlled part of the study is limited to 26 weeks, after which time all patients transition to open-label treatment with ravulizumab for up to 2 years during the OLE Period. At all points throughout the study, physicians are encouraged to prioritize patient safety, and if patients experience Clinical Deterioration, the full range of rescue therapies are permitted. Justification for Dose Ravulizumab is currently being studied in Phase 3 clinical studies in patients with PNH and aHUS, with PK / PD data extensively collected from all studies. Ravulizumab dosage regimens for these indications are selected based on comprehensive modeling and simulation analyses of the Phase 1 and 2 PK / PD data in healthy volunteers and PK / PD / efficacy (lactate dehydrogenase) and safety data in patients with PNH, and are considered optimal for achieving immediate, complete, sustained inhibition of terminal complement activity within each dosing interval and for the entire treatment course in all patients. The Phase 3 body weight-based dosage regimen (Table 14) are tested in patients with gMG in the current study. TABLE 14: Ravulizumab weight-based dosing Weight (kg) Loading Dose (sig) |     Mainiesaitoe Duse (mg) :       (administered q8w) > 40 to < 60 2400 3000 > 60 to < 100 2700 |              3300 > 100 3000             |             3600 Abbreviation: q8w = every 8 weeks. Consistent with approved eculizumab labeiing for treating adult and pediatric patients with aHUS and adult patients with gMG, supplemental dosing of ravulizumab in the amount of 50% (rounded up if not in integral of 300 mg due to vial configuration) is given in the setting of concomitant PP / PE rescue therapy and. For adult patients with gMG, supplemental dosing of ravulizumab (in the amount of 600 mg) is given in the setting of concomitant IVIg rescue therapy. The 600 mg per week supplemental ravulizumab dose is selected based on PK simulations considering the published data describing the impact of co-administration of IVIg on eculizumab PK / PD (Table 1; Table 2; Fitzpatrick, A. el al., J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst., 16:84-91, 2011). Supplemental study drug (or placebo) dosing is required if PE / PP or IVIg rescue therapy is provided on non-dosing days; no supplemental study drug (or placebo) dosing is required if PE / PP or IVIg infusion is provided on a dosing day, but it occurs prior to study drug administration. If PE / PP or IVIg is administered on scheduled dosing visits, regular dosing is followed 60 minutes after the completion of PE / PP or IVIg. If PE / PP or IVIg is administered on non-scheduled dosing visits, for patients receiving PE / PP: supplemental dose is administered 4 hours after the PE / PP session is completed; for patients receiving IVIg: supplemental dose is administered 4 hours after the last continuous session(s) of IVIg is completed as described herein. The favorable benefit / risk profiles of ravulizumab from the recently completed Phase 3 studies in patients with PNH confirm immediate (after the first dose or loading dose), complete (free C5 < 0.5 ug / mL) and sustained (throughout entire active treatment course) terminal complement inhibition under the above investigated dosage regimen. After the 26-Week Randomized-Controlled Period and assessments on Day 183 (Week 26), patients in the placebo group receive a blinded loading dose of ravulizumab and patients in the ravulizumab group receive a blinded ravulizumab dose of 900 mg; the 900 mg dose is chosen to ensure maintenance of complete C5 inhibition until the next scheduled maintenance dose at Week 28 (Day 197). Starting at Week 28 (Day 197), all patients begin open-label ravulizumab maintenance doses q8w. The proposed q8w dosage regimen facilitates studying a range of PK drug exposures useful in assessing ravulizumab exposure-response relationships in patients with gMG. Safety and tolerability of ravulizumab have been established over a wide range of PK exposures, including those expected under the proposed gMG dosage regimens, in healthy volunteers and patients. End of Study Definition A patient is considered to have completed the study if: ® The patient has completed all periods of the study including the last visit of the OLE Period, or ® In the event the study is completed early, the patient has completed all applicable periods of the study including the EOS visit • The patient completes the study early (and completes the EOS Visit) because the study drug has become registered or approved (in accordance with country-specific regulations) Measurement of the primary endpoints is complete after the last visit of the last patient in the Randomized-Controlled Period. The EOS is defined as the date of the last visit of the last patient in the study or last scheduled procedure shown in the schedule of activities (see, Table 10 and Table 11) for the last patient in the study globally. The study completion date corresponds to the last visit when the final patient in the study is examined or received an intervention for the primary or secondary endpoints and AEs. 7. Study Population Prospective approval of protocol deviations to recruitment and enrollment criteria, also known as protocol waivers are not allowed. Inclusion Criteria Patients are eligible to be included in the study only if all of the following criteria apply: Age 1. Male and female patients are aged >18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent Type of Patient and Disease Characteristics 2. Diagnosed with MG at least 6 months (180 days) prior to the date of the Screening Visit, as confirmed by protocol-specific criteria (see below). 3. Diagnosis of MG is made by the following tests: a. Positive serologic test for anti-AChR Abs as confirmed at screening, and b. One of the following: « History of abnormal neuromuscular transmission test demonstrated by single-fiber electromyography or repetitive nerve stimulation; ® History of positive anticholinesterase test (e.g., edrophonium chloride test); • Demonstrated improvement in MG signs on oral cholinesterase inhibitors, as assessed by the treating physician. 4. Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Cl inical Classification Class II to IV at screening. 5. MG-ADL profile is > 6 at screening and randomization (Day 1). 6. Patients receiving treatment with any of the following are receiving treatment and on a stable dose for the time periods specified below prior to the date of the Screening Visit: • Azathioprine (AZA): is on AZA for > 6 months (180 days) and have been on a stable dose for > 2 months (60 days); ® Immunosuppressive therapies (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], methotrexate [MTX], cyclosporine [CYC], tacrolimus [TAC], or cyclophosphamide [CY]), are on the 1ST for > 3 months (90 days) and are on a stable dose for > 1 month (30 days); ® Oral corticosteroids, are on a stable dose for > 4 weeks (28 days); • A cholinesterase inhibitor, at the time of the Screening Visit, are on a stable dose for > 2 weeks (14 days). 7. To reduce the risk of meningococcal infection (N. meningitidis), all patients are vaccinated against meningococcal infections within the 3 years prior to, or at the time of, initiating study drug. Patients who initiate study drug treatment less than 2 weeks after receiving a meningococcal vaccine receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until 2 weeks after vaccination. Weight 8. Body weight > 40 kg at the time of screening. Pregnancy and Contraception 9. Patients of childbearing potential and patients with partners of childbearing potential use contraception for avoiding pregnancy while on treatment and for 8 months after last dose of study drug. Informed Consent 10. Capable of giving signed informed consent. As part of the informed consent: ® The Investigator or his / her representative explains the nature of the study to the patient or his / her legally authorized representative and answers all questions regarding the study. ® Patients are informed that their participation is voluntary. Patients or their legally authorized representative are required to sign a statement of informed consent that meets the requirements of 21 CFR 50, local regulations, ICH guidelines, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act requirements, where applicable, and the IRB / IEC or study center. • The medical record includes a statement that written informed consent was obtained before the patient was enrolled in the study and the date the written consent was obtained. The authorized person obtaining the informed consent also signs the TCP. ® Patients is reconsented to the most current version of the informed consent forms (ICF(s)) during their participation in the study. A copy of the ICF(s) is provided to the patient. ® The Investigator retains the original version of the signed ICF(s). A copy of the signed ICF(s) is provided to the patient. ® A patient who is rescreened is not required to sign another ICF unless an updated ICF is available. Exclusion Criteria Patients are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: Medical Conditions 1. Any active or untreated thymoma. History of thymic carcinoma or thymic malignancy unless deemed cured by adequate treatment with no evidence of recurrence for > 5 years before Screening; 2. History of thymectomy within the 12 months prior to screening; 3. History of hypersensitivity to any ingredient contained in the study drug, including hypersensitivity to murine proteins; 4. History of Ai meningitidis infection; 5. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (evidenced by HIV-1 or HIV-2 antibody titer); 6. Known medical or psychological condition(s) or risk factor that, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfered with the patient’s full participation in the study, poses any additional risk for the patient, or confounds the assessment of the patient or outcome of the study; 7. History of hospitalization for > 24 hours, for any reason, within the 4 weeks (28 days) prior to screening; 8. Clinical features that, in the opinion of the Investigator, are consistent with MG crisis / exacerbation or Clinical Deterioration, at the time of the Screening Visit or at any time prior to randomization; 9. Female patients who plan to become pregnant or are currently pregnant or breastfeeding; 10. Female patients who have a positive pregnancy test result at screening or on Day 1. Prior / Concomitant Therapy 11. Use of the following within the time period specified below: • IVIg within the 4 weeks (28 days) prior to randomization (Day 1); • Use of PE within the 4 weeks (28 days) prior to randomization (Day 1); * Use of rituximab within the 6 months (180 days) prior to screening. 12. Patients who have received previous treatment with complement-inhibitors (e.g., eculizumab). Prior / Concurrent Clinical Study Experience 13. Participation in another interventional treatment study or use of any experimental therapy within 30 days before initiation of study drug on Day 1 in this study or within 5 half-lives of the study drug, whichever is greater. Screen Failures Screen failures are defined as patients who consent to participate in the clinical study but are not subsequently randomized to a treatment group. A minimal set of screen failure information is required to ensure transparent reporting of screen failure patients to meet the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials publishing requirements and to respond to queries from regulatory authorities. Minimal information includes demography, screen failure details, eligibility criteria, and any serious adverse event (SAE). Individuals who do not meet the criteria for participation in this study (screen failure) may be rescreened once based on discussion and agreement between the Investigator and the Medical Monitor. A patient who experiences a gMG Clinical Deterioration or exacerbation / crisis during the Screening Period wall be considered a screening failure. Such patients may be rescreened with Sponsor approval once they are treated and medically stable, in the opinion of the Investigator. At least 28 days of clinical stability must exist prior to enrollment. The patient must meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria at the time of rescreening to enter the study. 8. Study Drug Study Drugs Administered Ravulizumab is formulated at pH 7.0 and is supplied in 30 mL single-use vials. Each vial of ravulizumab contains 300 mg of ravulizumab (10 mg / mL) in 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 0.02% polysorbate 80, and water for injection. The comparator product is formulated as a matching sterile, clear, colorless solution with the same buffer components, but without active ingredient. Additional details are presented in Table 15. TABLE, 15: Study drug administered Product Name Ravulizumab Placebo Dosage Farm Concentrated sterile, preservative-free aqueous solution (10 mg / mL) in singleuse 30 tri 'rials Sterile, preservative-free aqueous solution in single-use 30 mL vials Route of Admmistration Intravenous infusion Intravenous infusion Dosing hismB.'tkiKS Refer to pharmacy manual for dosing instnirtions Refer tophamscy manual for dosing instructions Packaging and Labeling Glass vials and stoppered wife a butyl rubber stopper with aa aluminum overseal and a flip-off cap. Study drug will be supplied in kits. Glass vials and stoppered with a butyl rubber stopper wi th an aluminum oversea 1 and a flip-off cap. Study drug will be supplied in kits. Physical Description Liquid solution practically free from particles Liquid solution practically free from particles Mansfactaer Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Contracted Manufacturing Organization Aiexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Contracted Manufacturing Organization Source: product specifications Study drug is administered as indicated in Table 16. During the Randomized-Controlled Period, patients in the ravulizumab or placebo treatment groups receive a weight-based loading dose of ravulizumab or placebo, respectively, on Day 1 (Visit 2). At Visit 4 (Week 2), patients in the ravulizumab or placebo treatment groups receive weight-based maintenance doses or ravulizumab or placebo, respectively, q8w through the completion of the Randomized-Controlled Period (see, Table 16). After the completion of the Randomized-Controlled Period, patients enter the OLE Period. After the 26-Week Randomized-Controlled Period and assessments on Day 183 (Week 26), patients in the placebo group receive a blinded loading dose of ravulizumab and patients in the ravulizumab group receive a blinded ravulizumab dose of 900 mg; the 900 mg dose is chosen to ensure maintenance of complete C5 inhibition until the next scheduled maintenance dose at Week 28 (Day 197). Starting at Week 28, all patients begin open-label ravulizumab maintenance doses q8w. TABLE 16: Reference chart for weight-based dosing Sts* Period RavslUiimah or Placebo Basing Body Weight (kgf Dese (mg) Volume Placet) o Volum e(mL) BUssesst (0.9% Sodism Chlartfc) Veis me (sal.) Total Volume Rawiszsjmab Gros pt RgHdc-miaed-CcistrolM Loads ng dose (Day 1) >40 to <50 2400 240 0 240 480 > 60 to < 160 27<X> 270 0^ 270- 549 > 100 3000 300 0 300 600 Maintenance dose (Days 15.71= 127) > 40 to< 60 3000 300 0 300 600 >60te< 106 3309 330' 0 330 660 > 100 3600 360 0 360 729 Open-Label Extras ies Blitsde d doss'1 (Day 183) ' 40to< 60 900 90 150 240 480 >60 to <100 900 90 180 270 540 > 100 900 90 210 300' 609 Open-l^bel maintenance dose {Days 197 to 869 q8w) > 40 to < 60 3000 300 0^ 300' 609 >60to< 300 3300 330 0 330 660 > 100 3600 360 0 360 720 Placebo Grasp Random iied-Costrcdted Lcadi «g dose (Day i) > 40 to < 60 0 0 240 240 480 >69to< 100 O 0 270 270 549 > 100 O 0 300 300 609 MaijstenatKe dose {Days 15,7L 127) > 40 to < 60 0 0 300 300' 609 >60to< 100 0^ 0 330 330 660 > 100 O 0 360 360 720 Ojren-Lsbel EWessios Blinded leading dose-' (Day 183) > 40 to < 60 2400 240 0 240 480 >60»< 100 2700 270 0 270 540 > 100 3009 300 0 300 600 Open-label maintenance dose (Days 197 to 869, >40 to <60 3900 300 0 300 609 >60to< 100 3300 330 0^ 3?« 669 > 100 3600 360 0 360 7 iG i Dose regimen is based on the patient’s most recently recorded body weight from a previous study / screening visit, 2 Blinded dose on Day 183 (Week 26) for patients who were randomized to the ravulizumab group and are entering into the Open-Label Extension Period. Preparation / Handling / Storage / Accountability Study drug is released to the site upon receipt of all required essential documents based upon federal, state, and local regulations. Only patients enrolled in the study receive study drug and only authorized site staff supply or administer study drug. All study drug is stored in a secure, environmentally controlled, and monitored (manual or automated) area in accordance with the labeled storage conditions with access limited to the Investigator and authorized site staff. Study Drug Preparation Study drug is prepared and administered by a trained member of the site study team. Study drug is administered only to enrolled patients who are confirmed eligible for participation. Preparation of ravulizumab and placebo doses is performed in accordance with study center-specific local standards by qualified and study-trained pharmacy personnel. The handling and preparation of materials used to prepare and administer the study drug are carried out using aseptic techniques for sterile products. All study patients, investigative-site personnel. Sponsor staff, Sponsor designees, and all staff directly associated with the conduct of the study are blinded to patient treatment assignments. Further details on preparation and dose administration of study drug, as well as disposal of study drug, are found in the pharmacy manual. Storage The Investigator or designee confirms appropriate temperature conditions are maintained during transit for all study drugs received and that any discrepancies are reported and resolved before use of the study drug. Upon arrival at the investigative site, the study drug is promptly removed from the shipping cooler and stored in refrigerated conditions at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F). The pharmacist immediately records the receipt of the study drug and notifies the distributor if vials are damaged and / or if temperature excursions have occurred during transportation. Study drug is stored in a secure, limited-access storage area and temperature is monitored daily. Diluted solutions of study drug are stored at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) for up to 24 hours prior to administration. The solution is allowed to warm to room temperature prior to administration. The admixed drug product is at room temperature prior to administration. The material is not heated (e.g., by using a microwave or other heat source) other than by ambient air temperature. Packaging and Labeling The primary packaging of ravulizumab consists of a 30 mL vial (Type I borosilicate glass) with a stopper and a seal. The secondary packaging consists of a single vial carton. Both primary (vial) and secondary (carton) packaging include a booklet label with relevant information. Additional details are presented in Table 13 and in the pharmacy manual. The placebo has an identical appearance to that of ravulizumab. Accountability When a drug shipment is received at the site, the pharmacist verifies the contents, signs the packing invoice provided with the shipment, and maintains the original copy for review by the site monitor in the pharmacy binder. Additionally, study drug receipt (as well as condition of the study drug at the time of receipt) is reported to the IRT system to allow drug randomization, resupply, estimations, and drug expiration control. Unless notified otherwise, empty vials and vials with residual materials are kept for inspection and accountability by the study monitor prior to their destruction or handled per local pharmacy standard operating procedures for clinical study drugs. Destruction of used and unused vials, either locally or centrally, are properly documented. Drug accountability is managed through the IRT system and detailed instructions on managing the IRT drug accountability module is included in the IRT User Guide. The IRT module performs accountability in two stages, where site personnel complete an initial accountability entry in the system followed by confirmation by the Study Monitor that the site correctly enters the appropriate status for all study drug. The pharmacist or designee maintains accurate records demonstrating dates and amount of study drug received, to whom dispensed (patient-by-patient accounting), and accounts of any study drug accidentally or deliberately destroyed. These drug accountability records are readily available upon request, and are reviewed throughout the study. Each kit has a label and a place for the pharmacist to record the patient number and initials. The study monitor examines the inventory during the study. Additionally, the inventory records are readily available to regulatory authorities, the local regulatory agency, or an independent auditor’s inspection at any time. Refer to the Pharmacy Manual for additional information. Handling and Disposal All clinical study material that is provided to the Investigator is stored in a secure place, and appropriately trained personnel allocate and dispense it. Detailed records of the amounts of the study drug received, dispensed, and destroyed are maintained. To satisfy regulatory requirements regarding drug accountability, all remaining ravulizumab inventory is reconciled and destroyed or returned to Alexion at the end of the study according to applicable regulations. Refer to the Pharmacy Manual for further information. Randomization Patients are randomized on Day 1 after the Investigator has verified that they are eligible. Patients are stratified by region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Japan) and randomized 1:1 either to ravulizumab IV infusion or to placebo IV infusion. Patients are centrally randomized using IRT. Blinding All investigative site personnel, Sponsor staff, Sponsor designees, staff directly associated with the conduct of the study, and all patients are blinded to patient treatment assignments. The double-blind is maintained by using identical study drug kits and labels for ravulizumab and placebo. The placebo has an identical appearance to that of ravulizumab. The random code is maintained by the IRT provider. After the 26-Week Randomized-Controlled Period and assessments on Day 183 (Week 26), patients in the placebo group receive a blinded loading dose of ravulizumab and patients in the ravulizumab group receive a blinded ravulizumab dose of 900 mg. Starting at Week 28, all patients begin open-label ravulizumab maintenance doses q8w. For patients in the ravulizumab group, a blinded ravulizumab dose of 900 mg is chosen to ensure maintenance of complete C5 inhibition until the next scheduled maintenance dose at Week 28 (Day 197). Unblinding should only be considered for the safety of the patient. If unblinding is deemed necessary by the Investigator, the Investigator makes a reasonable attempt to contact the Sponsor to discuss possible unblinding. After a reasonable attempt has been made, the Investigator unblinds the patient’s treatment allocation using an IRT. The Investigator notes the date, time, and reason for unblinding. The Investigator also informs the Medical Monitor that the patient is unblinded; however, they do not reveal to the Medical Monitor the patients’ treatment allocation. When an adverse event (AE) is an unexpected or related and serious, the blind is broken for that specific patient only. The blind is maintained for persons responsible for the ongoing conduct of the study (such as the management, monitors, Investigators, etc.) and those responsible for data analysis and interpretation of results at the conclusion of the study, such as biometrics personnel. Unblinded information is only accessible to those who need to be involved in the safety reporting to Health Authorities, Independent Ethics Committees (lECs), and / or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Any patient who is unblinded during the study is discontinued from the study. Investigators receive only blinded information unless unblinded information is judged necessary for safety reasons. Concomitant Therapy Prior medications (including vitamins and herbal preparations), including those discussed in the exclusion criteria and procedures (any therapeutic intervention, such as surgery / biopsy or physical therapy) the patient takes or undergoes within 28 days prior to the start of screening until the first dose of study drug, are recorded. In addition, history' of meningococcal vaccination is collected for the 3 years prior to first dose of study drug. All medication use and procedures undertaken during the study are recorded. This includes all prescription drugs, herbal products, vitamins, minerals, over-the-counter medications, and any other current medications. Concomitant medications are recorded from the first infusion of study drug through 8 weeks after the patient’s last dose of study drug. Any changes in concomitant medications also are recorded. Any concomitant medication deemed necessary for the patient’s standard of care during the study, or for the treatment of any AE, along with any other medications, other than those listed as prohibited medications as defined herein, are given at the discretion of the Investigator. However, it is the responsibility of the Investigator to ensure that details regarding all medications are recorded. Study Drug Compliance Study drug is administered in a controlled setting under the supervision of the Investigator or designee, thereby ensuring compliance with study drug administration. Palliative and S upportive Care Palliative and supportive care is permitted during the course of the study for underlying conditions. Allowed Medications The medications described in the following sections are allowed under certain circumstances and restrictions. Cholinesterase Inhibitors For patients who enter the study receiving a cholinesterase inhibitor at screening, the dose and schedule of their cholinesterase inhibitor is maintained stable throughout the entire Randomized-Controlled and OLE Periods, unless there is compelling medical need. Increases in cholinesterase therapy that are required as a result of intercurrent illness or other medical cause of deterioration are permitted, but dosing is returned to dosing levels at study entry as soon as feasible and the Sponsor is notified of the change. 1. Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment is withheld for at least 10 hours prior to administration of the QMG and MGC tests. 2. If a decrease in cholinesterase inhibitor is considered based on clinical evaluation, Sponsor approval is obtained prior to the change in dose for the patient to remain on study. Immunosuppressi ve A gents The following immunosuppressive agents are allowed during the study: corticosteroid, AZA, MMF, MTX, TAC, CYC or CY. The immunosuppressive agent(s) and its appropriate dose level to be used for an individual patient is at the discretion of the treating physi cian / Investigator. 1. Corticosteroid: for patients who enter the study receiving oral corticosteroid, e.g., prednisone, the dose / schedule is not changed during the entire double-blind study period (i.e., the Randomized-Controlled Period). If a decrease or taper in steroid dose is considered during the Randomized-Controlled Period based on clinical evaluation, Sponsor approval is obtained prior to the change for the patient to remain on study. If the dose level subsequently is increased, the dose level increase is not above the dose level reported at the baseline (at the start of randomized treatment). 2. High-dose steroid is reserved for patients that experience clinical deterioration as defined herein. Every effort is made to notify the Sponsor within 24 hours of administration should a patient require rescue therapy for clinical deterioration. 3. AZX, MMF, MTX, TAG, CYC or CY: for patients who enter the study receiving above mentioned immunosuppressive agents, the dosing regimen of the immunosuppressive agent is not changed during the entire Randomized-Controlled Period. If a change in the dosing regimen is considered due to known toxicity or side effects associated with the given immunosuppressive agent, Sponsor approval is obtained prior to the dose change for the patient to remain on the study. A different immunosuppressive agent is not added or substituted during the 26~week Randomized-Controlled Period. Plasma Exchange / Plasmapheresis / Intravenous Immunoglobulin Use of PE / PP or IVIg is allowed for patients who experience a clinical deterioration as defined herein. The rescue therapy used for a particular patient is at the discretion of the Investigator. Every effort is made to notify the Sponsor within 24 hours should a patient require rescue therapy. Supplemental study drug (or placebo) dosing is required if PE / PP or IVIg rescue therapy is provided on nondosing days; if PE / PP or IVIg infusion is provided on a dosing day, it must occur prior to study drug administration. 1. If PE / PP or IVIg is administered on nonscheduled dosing visits a. Patients receiving PE / PP: supplemental dose is administered 4 hours after the PE / PP session is completed b. Patients receiving IVIg: supplemental dose is administered 4 hours after the last continuous session(s) of IVIg is completed c. Supplemental dose amount may or may not vary depending on PE / PP or IVIg (Table 1 and Table 2) 2. If PE / PP or IVIg is administered on scheduled dosing visits, a. Regular dosing is followed 60 minutes after the completion of PE / PP or IVIg. 3. No gap is required between a supplemental dose and the regular scheduled dose. Disallowed Medications The following concurrent medications are prohibited during the study: « Rituximab « Eculizumab (or other complement-inhibitors) Patient use of rituximab or eculizumab (or other complement inhibitors) at any point during the study results in the patient being discontinued from the study. Rescue Therapy Rescue therapy (e.g., high-dose corticosteroid, PP / PE or IVIg.) is allowed when a patient’s health is in jeopardy if rescue therapy is not administered (e.g., emergent situations) or, if a patient experiences clinical deterioration as defined herein. The rescue therapy used for a particular patient is at the discretion of the Investigator. The date and time of rescue medication admini stration as well as the name and dosage regimen of the rescue medication is recorded. Should a patient require rescue therapy, every effort is made to notify the Sponsor within 24 hours. Intervention after the end of the study Patients return to the care of their treating physician at the completion of study participation. 9, Discontinuation of study intervention and patient discontinuation / withdrawal Discontinuation of Study Intervention A patient may withdraw from the study at any time at his / her own request, or may be withdrawn at any time at the discretion of the Investigator for safety, behavioral, compliance, or administrative reasons. If a patient discontinues treatment from the study, the Investigator attempts to perform (if the patient agrees) assessments specified for the ET Visit, or if not possible, a follow-up phone is conducted 8 weeks after the last dose of study drug is administered (Table 10 and Table 11). Attempts are also made to follow all patients for safety for a total of 8 weeks from the day the last dose of study drug is administered. The Sponsor and site monitor are notified as soon as possible. If a patient is withdrawn from the study or withdraws consent no further data are collected. Patients who withdraw'' from the study are not be replaced. Patients are discontinued from study drug if any of the following occur during the study: I. Serious hypersensitivity reaction (such as bronchospasm with wheezing or requiring ventilator support or symptomatic hypotension or serum sickness-like reactions manifesting I to 14 days after study drug administration; 2. Severe uncontrolled infection; 3. Pregnancy or planned pregnancy; or 4. Sponsor deems it is in the best interest of the patient. 5. Use of rituximab, eculizumab (or other complement-inhibitors) The Investigator contacts the Medical Monitor prior to discontinuing a patient from study drug. If a patient discontinues from treatment, the patient is encouraged to return for the ET Visit (Table 10 and Table 11)8 weeks after the patient’s last dose of study drug. The reason for the treatment discontinuation (e.g., patient withdraws consent, patient withdrawal from procedures, physician decision, AE, or other reason specified m eCRF) is recorded. If a female patient is permanently discontinued from study drug due to pregnancy, the Investigator makes a reasonable attempt to follow-up, in accordance with local laws and regulations, until the outcome of the pregnancy is known. If the patient withdraws consent for disclosure of future information, the Sponsor retains and continues to use all data collected before such a withdrawal of consent. If a patient withdraws from the study, the patient may request destruction of any samples taken and not tested, and the Investigator documents this in the site study records as well as informs the site monitor and Sponsor. Lost to Follow Up A patient is considered lost to follow-up if the patient repeatedly fails to return for scheduled visits and is unable to be contacted by the study site. The following actions must be taken if a patient fails to return to the clinic for a required study visit: 1. The site attempts to contact the patient and reschedule the missed visit as soon as possible and counsels the patient on the importance of maintaining the assigned visit schedule and ascertain whether or not the patient wishes to and / or should continue in the study. 2. Before a patient is deemed lost to follow up, the Investigator or designee makes every effort to regain contact with the patient (where possible, 3 telephone calls and, if necessary, a certified letter to the patient’s last known mailing address or local equivalent methods). These contact attempts are documented in the patient’s medical record. 3. Should the patient continue to be unreachable, the patient is considered to have withdrawn consent and future missed visits are not considered protocol deviations. 10. Study Assessments and Procedures Efficacy Assessments Hospitalization Information related to all-cause hospitalization is collected from patient signing of the ICF through the OLE Period. Hospitalizations are defined as all admissions to a healthcare facility, irrespective of the underlying relation to MG. Dates of admission / discharge, reasons for hospitalization, relationship to MG, and other relevant information are collected. Hospitalization includes the following: 1. Emergency room visits related to MG with or without admission regardless of duration; 2. Unplanned admission to healthcare facility, regardless of relationship to MG; 3. Inpatient administration of MG-related infusion / treatment at a hospital facility (e.g, IVIg, PP, PE, ventilator support). Hospitalization does not include the following: 1. Routine study drug administration; 2. Rehabilitation facility; 3. Hospice facility; 4. Nursing / assisted living / extended-care facility; 5. Outpatient-care facilities; 6. Planned admission for treatment of a pre-existing condition (i.e., condition that started prior to obtaining informed consent); 7. Planned / unplanned outpatient surgery (e.g., used as a surgical facility); 8. Emergency room visit unrelated to MG without admission; 9. Outpatient administration of infusion / treatment at a hospital facility (e.g., IVIg, PP). Clinical Deterioration Information related to clinical deterioration, as defined herein, are collected from patient signing of the IGF through the OLE Period. The evaluation visit for a clinical deterioration is performed as soon as possible, within 48 hours of notification to the Investigator of the symptom onset. Additional Unscheduled Visits as defined herein, are scheduled at the discretion of the Investigator. The following tests and procedures are completed at this visit: 1. Measure vital signs and pulse oximetry, including assessments of systolic and blood pressure (BP), temperature (°C or °F), oxygen saturation (SO2), and heart rate (HR). 2. Record any new medications or changes to concomitant medications, including all treatments for MG. 3. Evaluate and record any new AEs or changes in AEs since the previous visit. 4. Administer MG-ADL by a properly trained evaluator, preferably the same evaluator, throughout the study. The recall period is the preceding 7 days or since the last visit whichever occurs earlier. 5. Administer clinical assessments QMG and MGC; these are performed at approximately the same time of day by a properly trained evaluator, preferably the same evaluator, throughout the study. 6. Collect blood sample for the AChR auto-Abs test. 7. Collect blood samples for clinical laboratory tests (Table 17). The tests detailed in Table 17 are performed by the central laboratory. Protocol-specific requirements for inclusion or exclusion of patients are detailed herein. Additional tests are performed at any time during the study. 8. If medically indicated for evaluation of clinical deterioration, additional tests are performed at the discretion of the Investigator. 9. PK / PD sampling at or during clinical deterioration Visit: a. Collect 1 blood sample for PK and free C5 assays if no study drug is administered. b. If the study drug is administered at the clinical deterioration Visit, according to the protocol schedule, collect 2 blood samples, trough and peak, at [ 1 ] 5-90 minutes before the study drug infusion and [2] within the 30 minutes following completion of study drug infusion. c. If the patient receives PP / PE or IVIg at the time of Clinical Deterioration, a supplemental dose of study drug is administered. Collect blood samples for PK, and free C5 at [I] 5 - 90 minutes before PP / PE or IVIg, [2] after PP / PE or IVIg and before study drug infusion, and [3] within the 30 minutes following completion of study drug infusion. TABLE 17: Protocol-required safety laboratory assessments Laboratory Assessments Parameters Hematology Platelet cotml: RB C count Hemoglobin Hematocrit RBC indices: Distribution width Mean corpuscular volume Mean corpuscular hemoglobin % Reticulocytes WBC count vrith differential: Neutrophils Lymphocytes Monocytes Eosinophils Basophils Clinical Chemistry LVV C-reactive protein Creatinine Chloride Potassium Bicarbonate Sodium Glucose (nonfasting) AST / SGOT ALT / SGPT Alkaline phosphatase. Gamma glutamyltraasferase Total and direct bilimbin Total protein Albumin Uric acid Coagulation international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin rime Routine urinalysis Appearance, color, specific gravity, pH, glucose, protein, creatinine, blood, ketones, bilimbm, urobilinogen, nitrite, Microscopic examination (if bioodor protein is abnunmd) Other Screening tests Serum U: tre beta-hCG pregnancy lest (as needed for patients of child-bearing potential) Serum follicle-stimulating hormone test (as needed for patients who consider themselves postmenopau sal) HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies The results of each test must be entered into the eCRF. Complement activity Free C5 ASIireiuariims: Al / r'U'Hamne arnmotranslerase” AST == a C5 = complement component 5; eCRF = electronic case report foots; hCG = human chorionic gonadotropin; HIV-1 == human immunodeficiency vims type 1: HIV-2 == human immunodeficiency vims type 2; RBC == red blood cells; SGOT === serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; SGPT === serum glntannc pyruvic transaminase; WBC = white blood cells. Safety Assessments Physical Examination A physical examination includes assessments of the following organs / body systems: skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck, lymph nodes, pulse, chest, heart, abdomen, extremities; musculoskeletal and general neurologic examination. An abbreviated physical examination consists of a body-system relevant examination based upon Investigator judgment and patient symptoms. For consistency, all efforts are made to have the physical examination performed by the same qualified study staff. Vital Signs and Pulse Oximetry Vital signs and pulse oximetry are measured at every visit and include assessments of systolic and diastolic BP (mmHg), temperature (°C or °F), SO2, and HR (beats per minute). Vital signs are obtained after the patient has been supine or seated for at least 5 minutes. Ideally, each patient’s BP is measured using the same arm. Electrocardiogram Single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) are obtained as outlined in the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11) using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the HR and measures PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Patients are supine for approximately 5-10 minutes before ECG collection and remain supine but awake during ECG collection. The Investigator or designee are responsible for reviewing the ECG to assess whether the ECG is within normal limits and determine the clinical significance of the results. Clinical Safety Laboratory Assessments Laboratory assessments are tested at a central laboratory facility. Any clinically significant abnormal results are followed until resolution or stabilization. All protocol-required laboratory assessments, as defined herein are conducted m accordance with the laboratory manual and the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11). The Investigator reviews the laboratory report, documents this review, and records any clinically relevant changes occurring during the study. The laboratory reports are filed with the source documents. Clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings associated with the underlying disease are not considered AEs unless they are judged by the Investigator to be more severe than expected for the patient’s condition. If such values do not return to normal / baseline within a period of time judged reasonable by the Investigator, the etiology is identified and the Sponsor notified. Urinalysis and Urine Chemistry Urine samples are analyzed for the parameters listed in (Table 17). A microscopic examination of urine samples is performed if the results of the macroscopic analysis are abnormal. Urine samples are also analyzed to measure protein and creatinine to calculate the urine protein: creatinine ratio. Virus Serology Human immunodeficiency virus testing for HIV-1 and HIV-2 is required of all patients prior to enrollment. Patients who are HIV positive are not enrolled. Immunogenicity Assessments Blood samples are collected to test for presence of AD As to ravulizumab in serum prior to study drug administration. Further characterization of antibody responses are conducted as appropriate, including binding and neutralizing antibodies, PK / PD, safety, and activity of ravulizumab. Antibodies to ravulizumab are evaluated in serum samples collected from all patients according to the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11). Serum samples are screened for antibodies binding to ravulizumab and the titer of confirmed positive samples are reported. The detection and characterization of antibodies to ravulizumab are performed using a validated assay by or under the supervision of the Sponsor. Suicidal Risk Monitoring Columbia-Suicidal Seventy Rating Scale The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; Figure 4 and Figure 5) is a validated questionnaire used extensively across primary care, clinical practice, surveillance, research, and institutional settings to assess suicidal ideation and behavior (Posner. K. el al., Am. J. Psychiatry, 168:1266-77, 2011). The C-SSRS is administered by the Investigator or a properly trained designee. The C-SSRS is assessed as specified in the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11). The C-SSRS is being implemented to ensure that patients who are experiencing suicidal ideation or behavior are properly recognized and adequately managed. Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Adverse events are reported to the Investigator or qualified designee by the patient (or when appropriate, by a caregiver, surrogate, or the patient’s legally authorized representative). The Investigator or qualified designees are responsible for detecting, documenting, and recording events that meet the definition of an AE or SAE, and remain responsible for following up events that are serious, considered related to the study drug or study procedures; or that caused the patient to discontinue the study drug. Time Period and Frequency for Collecting Adverse Event and Serious Adverse Event Information All AEs are collected from the signing of the ICF until 8 weeks after the last dose of study drug is administered. Medical occurrences that begin before the start of study drug, but after obtaining informed consent are recorded. All SAEs are recorded and reported to the Sponsor or designee within 24 hours. The investigator submits any updated SAE data to the Sponsor within 24 hours of awareness. Investigators are not obligated to actively seek AEs or SAEs after the conclusion of study participation. However, if the Investigator learns of any SAE, including a death, at any time after a patient has been discharged from the study, regardless of whether or not the event is related to the study drug, the Investigator promptly notifies the Sponsor. Method of Detecting Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Care is taken not to introduce bias when detecting AEs and / or SAEs. Open-ended and nonleading verbal questioning of the patient is the preferred method to inquire about AE occurrences. Follow-up of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events After the initial AE / SAE report, the Investigator is required to proactively follow each patient at subsequent visits / contacts. All SAEs will be followed until resolution, stabilization, the event is otherwise explained, or the patient is lost to follow-up (as defined herein). Regulatory Reporting Requirements for Serious Adverse Events ® The Investigator notifies the Sponsor of an SAE within 24 hours of the first awareness of the event. ® The Sponsor has a legal responsibility to notify both the local regulatory authority and other regulatory agencies about the safety of a study drug under clinical investigation. The Sponsor complies with country-specific regulatory requirements relating to safety reporting to the regulatory authority, IRB / IEC, and Investigators. ® The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) or MedWatch reports are prepared for suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) according to local regulatory requirements and Sponsor policy and forwarded to Investigators as necessary. Alexion procedures for the reporting of SUSARs are in accordance with United States Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 312.32 and European Union Clinical Trial Directive 2001 / 20 / EC and the associated detailed. ® Guidance documents or national regulatory requirements in participating countries, as well as IRBs / IECs where applicable. ® An Investigator who receives an Investigator safety report describing an SAE, or other specific safety information (e.g., summary or listing of SAEs) from the Sponsor reviews and acknowledges the report and notifies the IRB / IEC, if appropriate, according to local requirements. Pregnancy For patients of childbearing potential, a serum pregnancy test (i.e., beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) is performed at Screening and at the EOSZET. Urine pregnancy tests are performed at all other required time points, as indicated in the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11). A negative pregnancy test is required prior to administering ravulizumab to patients of childbearing potential. If a pregnancy is reported, the Investigator informs the Sponsor within 24 hours of learning of the pregnancy. Abnormal pregnancy outcomes (e.g., spontaneous abortion, fetal death, stillbirth, congenital anomalies, and ectopic pregnancy) are considered SAEs and are reported. Vaccine and Antibiotic Prophylaxis As with any terminal complement antagonist, the use of ravulizumab increases the patient’s susceptibility to meningococcal infection (N. meningitidis). To reduce the risk of meningococcal infection, all patients are vaccinated against meningococcal infections within the 3 years prior to, or at the time of, initiating study drug. Patients who initiate study drug treatment less than 2 weeks after receiving a meningococcal vaccine receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until 2 weeks after vaccination. Vaccines against serotypes A, C, Y, W135, and B, where available, are recommended to prevent common pathogenic meningococcal serotypes. Patients are vaccinated or revaccinated according to current national vaccination guidelines or local practice for vaccination use with complement-inhibitors (e.g., eculizumab). Vaccination may not be sufficient to prevent meningococcal infection. Consideration should be given per official guidance and local practice on the appropriate use of antibacterial agents. All patients are monitored for early signs of meningococcal infection, evaluated immediately if infection is suspected, and treated with appropriate antibiotics, if necessary. To increase risk awareness and promote quick disclosure of any potential signs or symptoms of infection experienced by the patients during the course of the study, patients are provided a safety card to carry with them at all times. Additional discussion and explanation of the potential risks, signs, and symptoms occur at each visit as part of the review of the patient safety card as described in the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11). Vaccination(s) for N meningitidis is recorded. Study Drug Administration Reactions Local and Systemic Reactions Infusion-site reactions are those localized to the site of IV study drug administration and include those such as erythema, pruritus, and bruising. Infusion-associated reactions are those that are systemic in nature and that may be immune or nonimmune-mediated generally occurring within hours of study drug administration. Immune-mediated reactions include allergic reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis), while nonimmune-mediated reactions are nonspecific (e.g., headache, dizziness, nausea). Monitoring for these reactions are conducted as part of routine safety assessments for this study. Infusion-Associated Reactions Infusion-associated reactions are defined as systemic AEs (e.g., fever, chills, flushing, alterations in HR and BP, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and generalized skin rashes) occurring during or within 24 hours of the start of IV infusion that are assessed by the Investigator to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug. Adverse Events of Special Interest Meningococcal infections are collected as adverse events of special interest (AESI) for this study. Pharmacokinetics Blood samples are obtained to assess pre- and post-treatment serum ravulizumab concentrations at the time points and within the windows indicated in the schedule of activities (see, Table 10 and Table 11). Samples obtained outside of the allotted windows are considered protocol deviations. Unused samples are retained for a period of up to 5 years to perform additional assessments as necessary. Pharmacodynamics Blood samples are obtained to assess pre- and post-treatment serum free C5 at the time points and within the windows indicated in the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11). Samples obtained outside of the allotted windows are considered protocol deviations. Unused samples are retained for a period of up to 5 years to perform additional assessments as necessary. Biomarkers Blood samples for the assessment of ACER. auto-Abs are obtained at the time points indicated in the schedule of activities (Table 10 and Table 11). Healthcare Resource Utilization and Health Economics Medical resource utilization and health economics data, associated with medical encounters, are collected by the Investigator or designee for all patients throughout the study. Data are recorded. Protocol-required procedures, tests, and encounters are excluded. The data collected is used to conduct exploratory economic analyses and include: • Number and duration of medical care encounters, including surgeries, and other selected procedures (inpatient and outpatient); • Duration of hospitalization (total days or length of stay, including duration by wards (e.g., intensive care unit); • Number and type of diagnostic and therapeutic tests and procedures; ® Outpatient medical encounters and treatments (including physician or emergency room visits, tests and procedures, and medications). 11. Statistical Considerations Statistical methods described herein will be further elaborated in a separate SAP. The SAP is developed and finalized before database lock. The analyses are performed using the SASCsj statistical software system Version 9.4 or later. Statistical analyses include tabulations of summary data, inferential analyses, by-patient listings and figures. Inference from efficacy analyses are based on 2-sided Type I error (a) == 5%. Summary statistics for continuous variables minimally include n, mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, and maximum. For categorical variables, frequencies and percentages are presented. The baseline value for analysis and reporting is based on the last nonmissing measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug. The treatment groups for analysis and reporting are based on the conventions outlined in Table 18. A ‘Total’ group is formed to report demographics, baseline characteristics and other prestudy information such as prestudy SAEs, medical history, or prior medications. Details for imputation of efficacy data are described in the SAP. Missing safety data are not imputed. Statistical Hypotheses Primary' Hypothesis The primary hypothesis for this study is that ravulizumab is superior to placebo in improvement of MG-ADL total score at Week 26. The treatment effect based on the primary endpoint is estimated by the difference in means between the ravulizumab group and placebo group in the change from Baseline in MG-ADL total score at Week 26 irrespective of rescue therapy !. A lower value of the corresponding estimate indicates a beneficial treatment effect. Secondary? Hypothesis The following secondary hypothesis is included in study-wise multiplicity adjustment (provided the null hypothesis for primary endpoint is rejected) and as provided herein. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in improvement of QMG total score at Week 26. Hypotheses Related to Exploratory Efficacy Objectives 1. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in reducing incidence of all-cause hospitalization or Clinical Deterioration over 26 weeks. 2. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in improvement of the MG-QOL15r total score at Week 26. 3. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in improvement of Neuro-QOL Fatigue total score at Week 26. 4. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in improvement of the MGC total score at Week 26. 5. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in QMG 5-point response (> 5 point improvement from baseline in QMG total score) at Week 26. 6. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in MG-ADL 3-point response (>3 point improvement from baseline in MG-ADL total score) at Week 26. 7. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in MGFA-PIS at Week 26. 8. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in improvement of EQ-5D-5L index score at Week 26. 9. Ravulizumab is superior to placebo in improvement of EQ-5D-5L VAS score at Week 26. The treatment effect corresponding to the change from Baseline continuous endpoints is estimated similarly as the primary endpoint. The treatment effect corresponding to the following dichotomous endpoints is estimated by the odds ratio (OR) of the proportions of the corresponding endpoint in the ravulizumab group compared with the placebo group: a. Incidence of all-cause hospitalization or Clinical Deterioration over 26 weeks irrespective of rescue therapy. b. QMG 5-point response at Week 26 irrespective of rescue therapy. c. MG-ADL 3-point response at Week 26 irrespective of rescue therapy. An estimate of OR < 1 corresponding to the composite hospitalization endpoint indicates a beneficial treatment effect, likewise an estimate of OR> 1 corresponding responder endpoints indicates a beneficial treatment effect. The treatment effect corresponding to the MGFA-PIS endpoint is estimated by the proportional OR of the cumulative proportions over the ordinal categories (starting from the best outcome) of this endpoint in the ravulizumab group compared with the placebo group at Week 26, irrespective of rescue therapy. An estimate of OR > 1 indicates a beneficial treatment effect. Sample Size Determination Approximately 160 patients are randomly assigned to ravulizumab and placebo in a 1:1 ratio (ravulizumab:placebo) stratified by region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Japan) to ensure at least 90% nominal power to reject the null hypotheses of no treatment difference for the primary and secondary endpoints based on 2-sided Type I error ( a) = 5%. Assumptions related to statistical power calculations are based on Study ECU-MG-301. Details are provided as defined herein. TABLE 18: Study ALXN1210-MG-306 analysis sets Population Randomized set | DesmptioB | All randomized patients grouped by randomized treatment group (for reporting 1 disposition, demographics, and baseline characteristics). PK .Analysis Set (PKAS) Full analysis set (TAS) j All ravulizumab treated patients with at least 1 post-baseline PK concentration : available. j Ail randomized patients who received at least I dose of study drag grouped by j randomized treatment group (for reporting efficacy data). Per protocol set (PPS) | Subset of FAS withoutany major protocol deviations1 during | Randomized-Controlled Period grouped by randomized treatment group (for i reporting key efficacy data). Safely set (SS) | All parents who received at least 1 dose of study drug grouped by treatment | actually received (for reporting exposure and safely data). Fea a patient io be | analyzed according to the treatment they actually received and not according to I the randomization schedule, they would have to receive that treatment for the Open-label extension set | entire duration of Randomized-Controlled Period. | Ali patients who received at least 1 dose of ravuliznmab starting from Week 26 | onward (tor reporting all data from the OLE Period). * Determination of applicable major protocol deviations for this purpose will be made prior to database lock and study unblinding. Statistical .Analyses Enrollment and Disposition The number of patients screened, screen failures, and randomized patients are presented. Enrollment information is presented grouped by stratification factor and treatment group. Number of patients discontinued along with reasons from Randomized-Controlled Period, OLE Period, and the overall study is summarized. Demographics, Baseline Characteristics, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria, and Protocol Deviations All demographic information and baseline characteristics are reported by treatment group and overall. No statistical test is performed for homogeneity among treatment groups. The number and percentage of patients not meeting specific inclusion or exclusion criterion are summarized. Similar summary is provided for major protocol deviations based on prespecified categories. Medical / Surgical History, Physical Examination, and Myasthenia Gravis History The medical and surgical history is summarized by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory (MedDRA) Activities, Version 20.1, or later by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term. MG and abnormal physical examination are also summarized. Prior and Concomitant Medications For analysis and reporting purpose, any medication started prior to first dose of study drug is considered as prior medication; and medications that started on or after the first dose of study drug are considered as concomitant medications. All prior and concomitant medications including MG-specific medications and rescue therapy during the study, if any, are summarized. Efficacy Analyses Primary Efficacy Analysis The Mixed-effects Model with Repeated Measures (MMRM) is used for the primary efficacy endpoint (change from Baseline in MG-ADL total score at Week 26) using all available longitudinal data (either complete or partial) regardless of whether patients received a rescue therapy. Rescue therapy includes high-dose corticosteroids, PP / PE or IVIg. It is allowed when a patient’s health is in jeopardy, if rescue therapy is not administered (e.g., emergent situations), or if a patient experiences clinical deterioration. Missing data is not imputed for the primary analysis. The model includes the MG-ADL change from Baseline score at each prespecified time point as the response variable, fixed categorical effects of treatment, study visit and treatment-by-study visit interaction, region; as well as fixed covariate of baseline MG-ADL total score. The treatment effect is evaluated via contrast for the treatment-by-visit term at Week 26. An unstructured covariance matrix is used to model the correlations among repeated measurements within each patient. Other covariance structures are implemented if a convergence issue occurs (details to be provided in SAP). The Ken ward-Rogers method is used to estimate the denominator degrees of freedom. Sensitivity Analyses for Primary Endpoint Two sensitivity analyses are performed for the primary efficacy endpoint to explore the robustness of the MMRM results for the primary efficacy analysis: I. Placebo-based sensitivity analysis: The placebo-based sensitivity analysis considers the Missing Not At Random (MNAR) mechanism for the missing data, where it is assumed that patients who discontinue early from ravulizumab follow the trajectory of outcomes similar to the one in the placebo group after discontinuation of ravulizumab, taking into account observed values prior to discontinuation. 2. Tipping point sensitivity analysis: This approach assumes that patients who discontinue from ravulizumab treatment experience worsening defined by a prespecified adjustment in the primary efficacy endpoint. Analyses of Secondary and Exploratory Endpoints All continuous secondary and exploratory endpoints related to change from Baseline are analyzed similarly as the primary endpoint. The composite endpoint of Clinical Deterioration or all-cause hospitalization is analyzed using a logistic regression model with treatment group, region. The individual components (clinical deterioration and all-cause hospitalization separately) are also analyzed in similar fashion. The QMG 5-point and MG-ADL 3-point responder endpoints are analyzed using a mixed effect repeated measures model. The model includes response variable at each pre-specified time point as the dependent variable, fixed categorical effects of treatment, study visit and treatment-by-study visit interaction, and region; as well as fixed covariate of baseline QMG or MG-ADL total score (depending on the response variable). The treatment effect is evaluated via contrast for the treatment-by-visit term at Week 26. An unstructured covariance matrix is used to model the correlations among repeated measurements within each patient. Other covariance structures are implemented if a convergence issue occurs (details to be provided in SAP). The MGFA-PIS endpoint at Week 26 is considered as an ordinal scale. A logistic regression of the cumulative odds (cumulated over the categories starting from best outcome) is performed using treatment as fixed categorical effect and adjusting for region. Long-term efficacy data is summarized descriptively based on OLE set. Multiplicity Adjustment for Primary and Secondary Endpoints The study is designed to strongly control the overall 2-sided Type I error of cr =;: 0.05. The primary null hypothesis is tested first at a = 0.05. If statistically significant, the secondary efficacy hypothesis is tested at a = 0.05. Per Protocol Analyses for Primary and Secondary Endpoints Supplemental per protocol analyses for primary and secondary endpoints are performed based on per protocol set (PPS) in the same manner as done for FAS. Safety Analyses The safety and tolerability of ravulizumab is assessed based on adverse events, clinical laboratory findings, vital sign findings, and ECG abnormalities. Safety analyses are performed on the Safety Population and OLE set based on the study period under consideration. Analysis of Adverse Events Analysis and reporting for AEs are based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) defined as an AE with onset on or after first dose of ravulizumab in the Randomized-Controlled Period. Treatment-emergent AEs and TESAEs are summarized by MedDRA SOC and Preferred Term, by seventy, and by relationship to the study drug. Patient-years adjusted event rates are generated to characterize long-term safety profile. Analysis of Clinical Laboratory Parameters, Vital Sign Measurements and Electrocardiogram Parameters Laboratory measurements as well as their changes from Baseline at each visit and shift from baseline, if applicable, are summarized descriptively. Significant ECG, vital sign, and pulse oximetry findings are also summarized using descriptive analyses. Other Safety Analyses The number and percentage of patients in each of the C-SSRS categories and shift analyses are produced. Results from pregnancy tests are summarized. Analysis of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetic parameters such as peak and trough serum ravulizumab concentrations are reported and summarized. Population PK analysis of ravulizumab are performed to characterize the PK of ravulizumab in patients with gMG using the sparse PK data. Key ravulizumab PK parameters such as clearance, volume of distribution, and terminal half-life are estimated using the population-PK analysis. The potential impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on ravulizumab PK are also assessed. Pharmacodynamic data (pre- and post-treatment free C5) are reported and summarized. Correlations between PK and PD are explored. Additional analyses are considered, if appropriate. / Analysis of Immunogenicity The presence of AD As in serum ravulizumab are assessed over the duration of the study. Immunogenicity results are analyzed by summarizing the number and percentage of patients who develop detectable ADA. The association of ADA with ravulizumab concentration, PD parameters, efficacy, and TEAEs are evaluated. Analysis of Exploratory Biomarkers Acetylcholine receptor antibody titer levels as well as their changes from Baseline at each visit are summarized descriptively. Interim Analyses No interim analysis is planned for Study ALXN1210-MG-306 during the Randomized-Controlled Period. The primary analysis is conducted when the last patient completes the Randomized-Controlled Period, the database is locked, and the study randomization schedule is unblinded. Periodic analysis and reporting is performed during the OLE Period based on regulatory requirement. Final analysis and reporting is conducted at the conclusion of the study. Additional Details on Sample Size Determination The power calculations are based on the longitudinal change from baseline in MG-ADL total score observed in Study ECU-MG-301. A simulation-based approach is adopted to calculate the power based on the model-based treatment effect in MG-ADL. A total of 160 patients are required to ensure at least 90% power to reject the null hypothesis of no treatment effect based on the change from Baseline in MG-ADL total score at Week 26. Further details are provided in the SAP. Additional Details on Sensitivity Analysis for Primary Endpoint To assess the credibility of the primary analysis, the following sensitivity analyses are planned, based on assumptions that are unfavorable enough to the ravulizumab group to constitute a convincing stress test of the primary analysis. Placebo-based Sensitivity Analysis The placebo-based sensitivity analysis considers the MNAR mechanism for the missing data, where it is assumed that patients who discontinue early from the ravulizumab group follow the trajectory of outcomes similar to the one in the placebo group after discontinuation of ravulizumab, taking into account observed values prior to discontinuation (Little, R. & Yau, L., Biometrics, 52:1324-33, 1996; Ratitch, B. etal., Pharm. Stat., 12:337-47, 2013). Patients discontinuing early from placebo are assumed to have unobserved outcomes similar to placebo patients who remain on their randomized treatment. The assumption that the efficacy profiles of dropouts after discontinuation of ravulizumab are similar to those of patients in the placebo group provides an estimate of efficacy attributable to patients in the ravulizumab group if received through the time point of interest, while limiting efficacy after early discontinuation to that of the placebo group. Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis An additional sensitivity analysis is performed based on the delta-adjusted stress testing method (tipping point analysis). This approach assumes that patients who discontinue from the active treatment experience worsening defined by a prespecified adjustment (delta) in the primary efficacy endpoint compared with the observed efficacy score of patients that continue the study to next visit (O’Kelley Al RB, Statistics in Practice. 1 ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014. p. 257-368). Since a negative change in QMG total score indicates improvement, the prespecified value of delta is a non-negative fixed quantity. For each value of delta., the treatment effect is determined and the value of delta for which the nominal 2-sided p-value crosses 0.05, is considered as the ‘tipping point’ in the sense that the positive conclusion drawn from the primary analysis is reversed when patients who drop out are assumed to experience this fixed worsening after the discontinuation visit. After such a tipping point is determined, clinical judgment is applied as to the plausibility of the assumptions underlying this tipping point. This methodology is expected to inform of what it would take to overturn study conclusions based on varying assumptions about missing data. A value of delta as zero is considered equivalent to the primary analysis. SEQUENCE SUMMARY SEQ ID NO :1 GYIFSNYWIQ SEQ ID NO :2 EIL P G S G S TEYTENFKD SEQ ID NO : 3 YFFGS S PNWYFDV SEQ ID NO :4 GASENIYGALN SEQ ID NO :5 GATNLAD SEQ ID NO:6 QNVLNTPLT SEQ ID NO r? QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKASGYIFSNYWIQWVRQAPGQGLEWMGEILPGSGSTEYTEN FKDRVTMTRDTSTS TVYME LS SLRS EDTAVYYCARYFFGS SPNWYFDVWGQGTLVTVSS SEQ ID NO:8 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCGASENIYGALNWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYGATNLADGVPSRFS GSGSGTDFTLTISSLQPEDFATYYCQNVLNTPLTFGQGTKVEIK SEQ ID NO:9 ASTKGPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLY SLSSWTVPSSNFGTQTYTCWDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVTCPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKP KDTLMIS RT PEVT C VWDVS QEDPE VQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNS T YR W S VLTVLH QDWLNGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSQEEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFY PSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSRLTVDKSRWQEGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHY TQKSLSLSLGK seq’^ QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKASGYIFSNYWIQWVRQAPGQGLEWMGEILPGSGSTEYTEN FKDRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCARYFFGSSPNWYFDVWGQGTLVTVSSASTK GPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLYSLSS WTVPSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKPKDTL MISRTPEVTCWVDVSQEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLTVLHQDWL NGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSQEEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDI AVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSRLTVDKSRWQEGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKS LSLSLGK SEQ ID NO:11 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCGASENIYGALNWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYGATNLADGVPSRFS GSGSGTDFTLTISSLQPEDFATYYCQNVLNTPLTFGQGTKVEIKR7VAA PS VFIFPPSDEQLK SGTASWCLLNNFYPREAKVQWKVDNALQSGNSQESVTEQDSKDSTYSLSSTLTLSKADYEKH KVYACEVT.HQGLS S PVTKS FNRGEC SEQ ID NO :12 QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSOKAS GHIFSNYWIQWVRQAPGQGLEWMGEILPGS GHTEYTEN FKDRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCARYFFGSSPNWYFDVWGQGTLVTVSS SEQ ID NO :13 ASTKGPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLY SLSSWTVPSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKP KDTLMISRTPEVTCVVVDVSQEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTYRWSVLTVLH QDWLNGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSQEEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFY PSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSRLT VDKSRWQEGNVFSCSVLHEALHSHY TQKSLSLSLGK SEQ ID NO:14 QVQLVQS GAEVKKPGASVKVS CKAS GHIFSNYWIQWVRQAPGQGLEWMGEILPGS GHTEYTEN FKDRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCARYFFGSSPNWYFDVWGQGTLVTVSSASTK GPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGV.HTFPAVLQSSGLYSLSS VVTVPSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKPKDTL MISRTPEVTCVVVDVSQEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLTVLHQDWL NGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSQEEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDI AVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSRLTVDKSRWQEGNVFSCSVLHEALHSHYTQKS LSLSLGK SEQ ID NO:15 ASTKGPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLY SLSSWTVTSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKP KDTLYITREPEVTCVWDVSHEDPEVQFNWYVDGMEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTFRWSVLTWH QDWLNGKEYKCKVSNKGLPAPIEKTISKTKGQPREPQVYTLPPSREEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFY PSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPMLDSDGSFFLYSKLTVDKSRWQQGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHY TQKSLSLSPGK SEQ ID NO:16 QVQLVQS GAEVKKPGAS VK VS CKAS GYIFSNYWIQWRQAPGQGLEWMGE ILPGS GS TE YTEN FKDRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCARYFFGSSPNWYFDVWGQGTLVTVSSASTK GPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLYSLSS WTVTSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKPKDTL NGKEYKCKVSNKGLPAPIEKTISKTKGQPREPQVYTLPPSREEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDI AVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPMLDSDGSFFLYSKLTVDKSRWQQGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKS LSLSPGK SEQ ID NO:17 GASENIYHALN SEQ~ID~No718 EIL PGS GHTEYTENFKD SEQ ID NO:19 GHIFSNYWIQ SEQ ID NO :20 QVQLVQS GAFATKKPGASVKVSCKAS GHIFSNYWIQW VRQAPGQGLEWMGEI LPGS GHTE YTEN FKDRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCARYFFGSSPNWYFDVWGQGTLVTVSSASTK GPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLYSLSS WTVPSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKPKDTL MISRTPEVTCVWDVSQEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTYRWSVLTVLHQDWL NGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSQEEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDI AVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSRLTVDKSRWQEGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKS LSLSLGK SEQ ID NO :21 S YAI S3 SEQ ID NO :22 GIGPFFGTANYAQKFQG SEQ ID NO : 23 DTPYFDY _____ SGDSIPNYYVY SEQ ID NO :25 DDSNRPS SEQ ID NO:26 QSFDSSLNAEV SEQ~ID~n6727 QVQLVQS GAEVKKPGSSVKVSCKASGGT FSSYAISVWRQAPGQGLEWMGGIGPFFGTANYAQK FQGRVTITADE STS TAYME L S S LRS E DTAVYYCARDT P YFDYWGQGT LVTVS S SEQ ID NO:28 DIELTQPPSVSVAPGQTARISCSGDSIPNYYVYWYQQKPGQAPVLVIYDDSNRPSGIPERFSG SNSGNTATLTISGTQAEDEADYYCQSFDSSLNAEVFGGGTKLTVL SEQ ID NO:29 NYIS SEQ ID NO :30 11DPDDSYTEYS P S FQG SEQ ID NO : 31 YEYGGFDI SEQ ID NO :32 SGDNIGNSYVH SEQ ID NO :33 KDNDRPS SEQ ID NO :34 GTYDIESYV SEQ ID NO : 35 EA72LVQSGAEVKKPGESKKISCKGSGYSFTNYISWVRQMPGKGLEWMGIIDPDDSYTEYSPSF QGQVTISADKSISTAYLQWSSLKASDTAMYYCARYEYGGFDIWGQGTLVTVSS SEQ ID NO :36 SYELTQPPSVSVAPGQTARISCSGDNIGNSYVHWYQQKPGQAPVLVrYKDNDRPSGIPERFSG SNSGNTATLTISGTQAEDEADYYCGTYDIESYVFGGGTKLTVL SEQ’^ SSYYVA SEQ ID NO :38 AI YT GS GAT Y'KAS WAKG SEQ ID NO :39 DGGYDYPTHAMHY QASQNIGSSLA SEQ ID NO:41 GASKTHS SEQ ID NO :42 QSTKVGS SYGNH QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAASGFTSHSSYYVAWVRQAPGKGLEWVGAIYTGSGATYKAS WAKGRFTISKDTSKNQWLTMTNMDPVDTATYYCASDGGYDYPTHAMHYWGQGTLVTVSS SEQ ID NO:44 DWMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCQASQNIGSSLAWYQQKPGQAPRLLIYGASKTHSGVPSRFS GSGSGTDFTLTISSLQPEDVATYYCQSTKVGSSYGNHFGGGTKVEIK SEQ ID NO:45 QVQLVESGGGLVQPGRSLRLSCAASGFTVHSSYYMAWVRQAPGKGLEWVGAIFTGSGAEYKAE WAKGRVTISKDTSKNQWLTMTNMDPVDTATYYCASDAGYDYPTHAMHYWGQGTLVTVSSAST KGPSVFPLAPSSKSTSGGTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLYSLS SWTVPSSSLGTQTYICNVNHKPSNTKVDKKVEPKSCDKTHTCPPCPAPELRRGPKVFLFPPK PKDTLMISRTPEVTCVVVDVSHEDPEVKFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQYNSTYRVVSVLTVL HQDWLNGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSREEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGF YPSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSKLTVDKSRWQQGNVFSCSVLHEALHAH YTRKELSLSP SEQ ID NO:46 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCRASQGISSSLAWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYGASETESGVPSRFS GSGSGTDFTLTISSLQPEDFATYYCQNTKVGSSYGNTFGGGTKVEIKRTVAAPSVFIFPPSDE QLKSGTASWCLLNNFYPREAKVQWKVDNALQSGNSQESVTEQDSKDSTYSLSSTLTLSKADY EKHKVYACEVTHQGLSS PVTKSFNRGEC SEQ ID NO:47 QVQLQESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGDSVSSSYWTWIRQPPGKGLEWIGYIYYSGSSNYNPSL KSRATISVDTSKNQFSLKLSSVTAADTAVYYCAREGNVDTTMIFDYWGQGTLVTVSS SEQ ID NO:48 AIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCRASQGIRNDLGWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYAASSLQSGVPSRFA GRGSGTDFTLTISSLQPEDFATYYCLQDFNYPWTFGQGTKVEIK SEQ ID NO:49 QVQLQESGPGLVKPSETLSLTCTVSGDSVSSSYWTWIRQPPGKGLEWIGYIYYSGSSNYNPSL KSRATISVDTSKNQFSLKLSSVTAADTAVYYCAREGNVDTTMIFDYWGQGTLVTVSSASTKGP SVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLYSLSSW TVPSSSLGTKTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKRVESKYGPPCPPCPAPEFLGGPSVFLFPPKPKDTLM ISRTPEVTCWVDVSQEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTYRWSVLTVLHQDWLN GKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSQEEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDIA VEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSRLTVDKSRWQEGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKSL SLSLGK SEQ ID NO :50 AIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCRASQGIRNDLGWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYAASSLQSGVPSRFA GRGSGTDFTLTISSLQPEDFATYYCLQDFNYPWTFGQGTKVEIKRTVAAPSVFIFPPSDEQLK SGTASWCLLNNFYPREAKVQWKVDNALQSGNSQESVTEQDSKDSTYSLSSTLTLSKADYEKH KVYACEVTHQGLSSPVTKS FNRGEC

Claims

1. A method of treating generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) in a human patient, thetreatment comprising administering to the patient an effective amount of a composition, wherein the composition comprises an antibody or an antigen binding fragment thereof comprising CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 heavy chain sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs:19, 18 and 3, respectively, and CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 light chain sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs:4, 5 and 6, respectively, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof is administered:(a) once on Day 1 of the administration cycle at a loading dose of:i.     2400 mg to a patient weighing > 40 to < 60 kg,ii.     2700 mg to a patient weighing > 60 to < 100 kg, oriii.    3000 mg to a patient weighing > 100 kg; and(b) on Day 15 of the administration cycle and every eight weeks thereafter at a maintenance dose of:i.     3000 mg to a patient weighing > 40 to < 60 kg,ii.     3300 mg to a patient weighing > 60 to < 100 kg, oriii    3600 mg to a patient weighing > 100 kg; andwherein the treatment results in (a) the patient experiencing a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score, optionally together with (b) a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG).

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragmentthereof comprises a variant human Fc constant region that binds to human neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), wherein the variant human Fc CH3 constant region comprises Met-429-Leu and Asn-435-Ser substitutions at residues corresponding to methionine 428 and asparagine 434, each in EU numbering.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the antibody or the antigen bindingfragment thereof comprises the heavy chain variable region of SEQ ID NO:12 and the light chain variable region of SEQ ID NO:8, optionally wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof further comprises the heavy chain constant region of2020223298   26 Aug 2026SEQ ID NO:13, optionally wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof comprises a heavy chain polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:14 and the light chain polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:11.

4. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the antibody or theantigen binding fragment thereof binds to human C5 at pH 7.4 and 25OC with an affinity dissociation constant (Kd) that is in the range 0.1 nM < Kd < 1 nM, optionally wherein the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof, binds to human C5 at pH 6.0 and 25OC with a Kd > 10 nM.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising switching thepatient from eculizumab treatment to the treatment with the composition comprising the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof.

6. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the treatmentmaintains a serum trough concentration of the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof of 100 ugmL or greater during the administration cycle, optionally wherein the treatment maintains a serum trough concentration of the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof of 200 ugmL or greater during the administration cycle, optionally wherein the treatment maintains a free antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof concentration of 0.309 to 0.5 ugmL or less.

7. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the antibody or theantigen binding fragment thereof is administered at a dose of 3000 mg, 3300 mg or 3600 mg every eight weeks after the administration cycle for up to two years.

8. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the antibody or theantigen binding fragment thereof is formulated for intravenous administration.

9. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the patient has notpreviously been treated with a complement inhibitor, optionally wherein the administration cycle is a total of 26 weeks of treatment.

10. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the treatment results in terminal complement inhibition.2020223298   26 Aug 202611. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the treatment results in the patient experiencing a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score after 26 weeks of treatment, optionally wherein the clinically meaningful improvement the patient experiences is at least a 3 point reduction in the patient’s MG-ADL score after 26 weeks of treatment.

12. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the treatment results in a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG) after 26 weeks of treatment, optionally wherein the clinically meaningful improvement the patient experiences is at least a 5 point reduction in the patient’s QMG after 26 weeks of treatment.

13. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the treatment results in (a) the patient experiencing a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score, together with (b) a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG).

14. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the treatment results in a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) score after 26 weeks of treatment, optionally wherein the treatment results in a clinically meaningful improvement (reduction) in quality of life as measured by Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r), in neuro-fatigue as measured by Neuro-QOL Fatigue score, in the Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) health status score or in the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS) after 26 weeks of treatment.

15. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the gMG patient is anti-AChR antibody positive.

16. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the antibody is ravulizumab.

17. A kit when used for treating generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) in a human patient, the kit comprising:2020223298   26 Aug 2026(a) a dose of an antibody or an antigen binding fragment thereof comprising heavy chain CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 heavy chain sequences as set forth in SEQ ID Nos: 19, 18 and 3, respectively, and CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 light chain sequences as set forth in SEQ ID Nos: 4, 5 and 6, respectively, wherein the antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof is administered:(a) once on Day 1 of the administration cycle at a loading dose of:i.     2400 mg to a patient weighing > 40 to < 60 kg,ii.     2700 mg to a patient weighing > 60 to < 100 kg, oriii.    3000 mg to a patient weighing > 100 kg; and(b) on Day 15 of the administration cycle and every eight weeks thereafter at a maintenance dose of:i.     3000 mg to a patient weighing > 40 to < 60 kg,ii.     3300 mg to a patient weighing > 60 to < 100 kg, oriii    3600 mg to a patient weighing > 100 kg; and(b) instructions for using the antibody or the antigen binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding claims, optionally wherein the antibody is ravulizumab.

Images