Systems and methods for interactively assisting users in assessing hearing loss.

Abstract

Systems and methods for interactively assisting users in assessing hearing loss. The system (2), method, and computer program are designed to interactively assist users in assessing and / or configuring hearing aids (4). The system is equipped with a display element (8), an input unit (10), and a processing unit (12A, 12B), whereby a) environmental conditions are displayed on the display element, b) based on user input, segments of selected environmental conditions are determined and highlighted (16), c) specific hearing conditions are presented based on user selections, d) an assessment scale (20) is displayed, allowing the user to input a self-assessed hearing value (H) for the user's hearing ability in a specific hearing condition, and the user-input hearing value is recorded, e) steps a) to d) are repeated, and hearing values ​​are recorded for different specific hearing conditions, and f) the hearing aid settings (E) are determined based on the user-input hearing value.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a system, method, and computer program for providing interactive support to users, particularly those with hearing impairments, in assessing hearing loss, especially for configuring hearing aids, particularly for initial configuration. Background Technology

[0002] Hearing aids are generally understood as devices that compensate for the hearing loss of individuals. In particular, these hearing aids have user-specific, frequency-dependent amplification capabilities, depending on the individual's hearing impairment. Modern hearing aids also offer many other functions.

[0003] To achieve satisfactory hearing results, each hearing aid must be individually matched to the user. In addition to the different types of hearing aids that vary in design, each hearing aid must also be parameterized for its functions, particularly its frequency-related amplification capabilities tailored to the individual. Therefore, the settings for adjustment parameters must be determined individually and transmitted to the hearing aid.

[0004] Today, hearing aids are typically adjusted by audiologists. To identify an individual's hearing impairment, this is often done by providing the user, the person with hearing loss, with different hearing samples. The user assesses how he or she perceives these sound samples. These sound samples may be, for example, speech samples, music samples, or other sounds or noise.

[0005] In general, determining an individual's hearing loss and the necessary settings for adjusting hearing aids is complex and time-consuming. This is often a barrier for first-time users who do not yet have hearing aids. This frequently leads to the fact that these first-time users, despite hearing loss, do not use hearing aids, which can negatively impact their social relationships. Summary of the Invention

[0006] Based on the above, the present invention aims to simplify the configuration of hearing aids, especially the initial configuration, particularly for first-time users.

[0007] According to the present invention, the above-mentioned task is accomplished by a system, method, and computer program designed to support users, particularly those with hearing loss, when assessing their hearing loss, especially during the (initial) configuration of hearing aids. The advantages and preferred configurations listed below in conjunction with the system can also be similarly applied to the method and computer program. The system typically includes one or more devices specifically designed to perform the process. The system includes:

[0008] - A display element used to display an image illustrating the environmental conditions. This image is specifically a representation of the real environment. The image of the real environment should be understood as, for example, a photograph, but can also be understood as an animated representation that naturally reproduces the environment, i.e., people, buildings, streets, vehicles, etc.

[0009] - An input unit for detecting user input, particularly for selecting a segment of the environment presented based on the user input. This input unit may be designed as a touchscreen, a standalone input device such as a keyboard or mouse, or for receiving voice or gesture commands.

[0010] A processing unit is used to control the display unit and process user input. A processing unit is typically a computer unit, i.e., a processor with commonly associated components such as memory, a graphics card for controlling the display elements, and an interface for user input. The processing unit can also be distributed across several different hardware devices.

[0011] The processing unit is configured to perform the following steps, which also characterize the process. The computer program has commands that, when executed by the system, cause the system to perform the following steps based on user input:

[0012] a) Display the environmental conditions on the display element.

[0013] b) Based on user input, determine and highlight the selected segment of the environmental situation (16),

[0014] c) Display specific hearing information based on user selections.

[0015] d) Display the assessment scale, based on which users can input their self-assessed hearing scores for specific hearing conditions, and record the input hearing scores.

[0016] e) Repeat steps a) through d), and record the hearing values ​​for each specific hearing condition, and optionally...

[0017] f) Determine the hearing aid settings based on the user's input hearing value.

[0018] This process offers the following advantages: it provides an interactive interface through natural graphical representations of environmental conditions and interactive graphical animations, allowing users to operate the interface intuitively and enjoyably. Furthermore, it records primary relevant information about the user's hearing impairment, particularly in relation to different environmental conditions and therefore different hearing conditions.

[0019] The assessment scale displayed in the selected image representing a specific hearing condition graphically includes, for example, graphic symbols in the form of smiley faces, a grading scale, or a control panel. Graphic symbols are preferred.

[0020] By repeatedly selecting specific segments from images that relate to a particular hearing condition, users can self-assess their hearing loss. Based on this, the system determines settings, particularly for individual frequency-related amplification, and then uses these settings to further configure the hearing aid.

[0021] The proposed system and method

[0022] a) (Only) used to assist users in assessing their hearing loss.

[0023] b) Optionally, it can be used additionally in conjunction with the configuration of the hearing aid based on the assessment of hearing loss in step a), wherein,

[0024] c) The configuration can be the initial configuration input for the first basic configuration of a hearing aid, such as a purchased hearing aid.

[0025] d) Alternatively or additionally, the configuration may be a fine-tuning of an already configured hearing aid that the user (wearer) is already using, for example, to adapt the hearing aid to a new hearing condition, and especially to adapt the hearing aid to the wearer's new hearing behavior.

[0026] For example, the system and method may be used with an audiologist during the trial phase of the purchase process. Additionally or alternatively, the system and method may be used for hearing aid evaluation and hearing aid research.

[0027] Ideally, sound samples should not be provided with the system and process. This means that settings are determined solely by the user's self-assessment of their specific hearing condition in relation to different graphical representations. In this respect, there is no "measurement" of the user's hearing impairment by providing and evaluating sound samples such as speech, music, sounds, noise, etc.

[0028] Preferably, the system includes a local device, particularly a portable device such as a tablet computer or smartphone. Alternatively, the device may be a local personal computer. The tablet computer, smartphone, or personal computer may have a computer program installed to control the process. Typically, user input is performed through this local device. The local device includes input elements, display elements, and at least a portion of an input unit and a processing unit. According to a first embodiment, an application (computer program) is installed on the local device to perform all steps for assisting the user. In this case, the processing unit of the local device is the sole processing unit of the system.

[0029] Alternatively, for installation on a local device, a separate system with local and remote devices is provided. For example, a web-based solution can be used, which users can control via an internet browser. In this case, the application is installed or resides on a remote device. In such a separate system, the processing unit is typically physically divided into local and remote components.

[0030] Ideally, the user should be assisted solely by electronic systems, without any interaction with people, such as healthcare professionals like hearing specialists.

[0031] According to a preferred alternative, the user is assisted by a human, such as a hearing specialist or other healthcare professional. Preferably, the user and the healthcare professional are geographically distant. The remote device includes an additional display element. Specifically for this situation, the same content is displayed on both the original display element and this additional display element. This ensures that the hearing specialist can track user interactions, and that the user and the hearing specialist see the same images.

[0032] Ideally, the segment selected by the user should be highlighted in the image. According to a design variation, for example, a so-called "spot technique" is used for this purpose, where the selected area is highlighted in a cone-like manner.

[0033] Preferably, the displayed image depicts several environmental scenarios, each representing a different hearing scenario. The user can select an individual hearing scenario. Therefore, the image contains several areas representing general real-life scenarios that correspond to different hearing scenarios. These different areas or environmental scenarios are visually represented, for example, by displaying a conversation, a playground, a concert hall, a stadium, a restaurant, etc. These different areas / environments cover different hearing scenarios. For example, three or more, preferably five or more, different hearing scenarios are displayed in the image.

[0034] A listening scenario should be understood as a complex listening environment in which several specific listening situations may occur. A specific listening situation is generally defined by one or more specific sound sources or sound source types.

[0035] The listening scenarios include listening environments such as "office", "concert hall", "children's playground", "sports facilities", and "restaurant".

[0036] Examples of hearing impairment include "children's voices," "conversations," "bird calls," and "traffic noise."

[0037] The user-selected segment, particularly the selected hearing scenario, is preferably displayed as a new detailed image. Within this detailed image, different specific hearing conditions are offered for the user to choose from. If the user selects one of these specific hearing conditions, that condition is preferably highlighted again. Specifically, an evaluation scale is displayed for the selected hearing condition, and the hearing value entered by the user is recorded. Therefore, this version of the system is designed to allow for multi-stage selection by the user before displaying the evaluation scale for a specific hearing condition.

[0038] This method is based on the fact that in typical hearing scenarios, such as a children's playground, different specific hearing conditions may arise, namely, different sound sources, and these hearing conditions are assessed individually. In this way, more accurate settings can be achieved. These different specific hearing conditions include, for example, "conversations," "ambient sounds" such as birds or traffic, or "children's voices."

[0039] Preferably, additional assessment scales are displayed, allowing users to use reference values ​​to evaluate the relevance of the selected hearing condition to their own. This assessment of the relevance of the corresponding hearing condition enables conclusions to be drawn about user behavior.

[0040] Alternatively or otherwise, based on the user's selected segments, and especially based on the user's selected listening scenarios, the relevance of different specific listening scenarios to the user can be automatically derived. This is based on the consideration that the user will only select those environmental situations and scenarios that are relevant to the user from the overall image displayed.

[0041] Evaluate user input. To this end, in particular, perform the following steps:

[0042] The system preferentially stores defined user categories and assigns users to one of these categories based on user input, particularly based on user-selected segments. Assignment is especially based on user-selected listening scenarios. Through these selections, users reveal information about their general behavior and lifestyle. This allows for user categorization, such as classifying users as active or passive, which in turn influences the selection of settings.

[0043] The preferred approach is to automatically determine the specific hearing impairments and their severity based on user input. Then, settings tailored to that user, particularly frequency-related amplification factors, are derived.

[0044] Furthermore, it is preferable to define hearing loss categories, and assign users to one of these predefined categories based on hearing values ​​specific to their hearing condition. Hearing loss categories typically categorize the types of hearing impairment. This means that each hearing loss category defines a different type of hearing impairment. Possible categories of hearing loss include, for example:

[0045] - Broadband high-frequency loss (hearing impairment in the frequency range from 250Hz to 1kHz, and additionally in the high-frequency range between 1kHz and 4kHz, which is particularly relevant to speech comprehension),

[0046] - Steep attenuation at higher frequencies (hearing loss with strong attenuation in the high-frequency range from 1kHz to 8kHz)

[0047] - Conductive hearing loss.

[0048] Therefore, hearing loss categories clearly define hearing impairments across different frequency ranges.

[0049] For each specific hearing condition, a pair of values ​​is typically defined, consisting of the selected specific hearing condition, often the specific sound source, and the self-assessed hearing value. The corresponding specific hearing condition can be assigned to one or more hearing loss categories.

[0050] In order to assign a user to a hearing loss category, the first method involves summing hearing values ​​for various specific hearing conditions to form a total value, and assigning the user to a hearing loss category based on that total value.

[0051] For more accurate classification, the following methods are preferred:

[0052] Several hearing loss categories are assigned to a hearing condition, with each category weighted using a weighting factor specific to the selected hearing condition. Therefore, each particular hearing condition is defined by a weighted hearing loss category that represents the importance of that particular hearing loss category to that particular hearing condition. The weighting factor is between 0 and 1.

[0053] Furthermore, the hearing loss categories assigned and weighted according to different hearing loss conditions are weighted using the hearing values ​​input by the user for different hearing loss conditions. Therefore, for each hearing loss condition, a user-specific category value is obtained for each assigned hearing loss category. Finally, for various specific hearing loss conditions, the category values ​​for each individual hearing loss category are aggregated, and a total category value is obtained for the corresponding hearing loss category. Therefore, a total category value is obtained for each hearing loss category. Then, assignments are performed based on the determined total category value.

[0054] For example, the specific hearing condition "dialogue" was assigned to the hearing loss category "broadband high-frequency loss" with a weighting factor of 1 and the hearing loss category "high-frequency steep attenuation" with a weighting factor of 0.2. In contrast, the specific hearing condition "children's voice" was assigned to the hearing loss categories "broadband high-frequency descent" and "high-frequency steep attenuation" with weighting factors of 0.5 respectively.

[0055] This allocation can also be understood as a vector, whereby each specific hearing condition is represented by a vector with several elements. Each element corresponds to a hearing loss category, and each element is assigned a weighting factor. The vector is then multiplied by the hearing value input for that specific hearing condition. This yields a category value for each hearing loss category for that specific hearing condition. The total category value for each hearing loss category is then obtained by summing the vectors. The result is either a total category value or a resulting total vector, serving as a measure of the weighted allocation of hearing loss categories. This produces a more differentiated approach that allows for more accurate adjustment of hearing aids.

[0056] Based on the assignment to one of the hearing loss categories, the final set of settings, especially the frequency-dependent gain values, is derived. For example, these settings can be determined using a lookup table or algorithm based on the assigned hearing loss category.

[0057] Additionally, critical hearing conditions are identified. For each critical hearing condition, a condition-specific hearing program is selected from a predefined set of hearing programs and applied to the hearing aid. Specifically, a predefined set of parameter differences is selected. Critical hearing conditions are determined based on assigned user categories and / or based on specific hearing conditions that the user perceives as "poor." In this context, "poor" should be understood as the user stating that their hearing ability is in the lower half of an assessment scale provided for self-assessment. This is typically used to identify hearing conditions that are critical to the user due to hearing impairment. During hearing aid operation, a more accurate fit is achieved by storing hearing programs specifically designed for these hearing conditions. If such a critical hearing condition occurs, the hearing aid is switched specifically to a particular hearing program for that specific critical hearing condition. This is generally done by providing an indication of the difference between the setting and the normal setting. The hearing program is a standardized program and is user-independent. Preferred hearing aids include a so-called classifier that can automatically distinguish and identify hearing conditions. If the classifier identifies this critical hearing condition, the system automatically switches to a specific hearing program.

[0058] Ideally, the selection of a suitable hearing aid should be based on the user's input, particularly on the assigned user category and / or the determined category of hearing loss. Specifically, a suitable hearing aid should be selected from various hearing aid types (ITE, BTH, RIC, CIC, etc.). In addition to lifestyle information, information about the hearing impairment should be considered to make decisions such as whether an ITE (In The Ear), RIC / CIC (Receiver / Completely in Canal), or BTH (Behind The Ear) hearing aid should be provided to the user.

[0059] Finally, the selected hearing aid is configured, which involves parameterizing the selected hearing aid using the determined settings. This automatically performs the initial configuration of the hearing aid.

[0060] Then, the hearing aid is made available to the user. This is done, for example, by delivering it directly to the user.

[0061] In summary, the design presented here makes configuring hearing aids for the first time easy, keeping the barrier to entry as low as possible, especially for first-time users. Such first-time users can easily identify and configure suitable hearing aids and test them, for example, by sending them via a web-based application. Attached Figure Description

[0062] The following sections, with reference to the accompanying drawings, will illustrate other details and examples.

[0063] Figure 1 A highly simplified illustration is provided for a system used to interactively assist the user during the initial configuration of a hearing aid.

[0064] Figure 2A A simplified illustration is provided, showing a display element with an (overall) image for several environmental conditions.

[0065] Figure 2B A simplified illustration shows how detailed images can be displayed based on the user's selection. Figure 2A The display element shown,

[0066] Figure 3A A simplified illustration shows a similarity to the second variation scheme. Figure 2A The illustration,

[0067] Figure 3B The simplified illustration shows the basis for highlighting segments after the user makes a selection. Figure 3A The illustration. Detailed Implementation

[0068] Figure 1 The system 2 shown is used for interactive support of the user during the initial configuration of the hearing aid 4. According to... Figure 1 In one embodiment, system 2 includes a local user device, such as a tablet computer 6, having a display as a display element 8, whereby the display element 8 is designed as a touchscreen, thus forming an input unit 10. Due to the computing power of the tablet computer 6, it also has a (first) processing unit 12A for processing user input. Figure 1 In the embodiment indicated, there is a connection via the Internet to a remote device 11 having another processing unit 12B. This could be a computer belonging to the hearing aid manufacturer or distributor. The two processing units 12A and 12B together form a common processing unit for executing the method and for providing interactive support to the user. According to the first embodiment, no human assistance is involved.

[0069] Alternatively, human assistance, particularly from hearing specialists, is provided. In particular, in this case, the remote device has an additional display element 13 (shown in dashed lines). The image displayed on display element 8 is also displayed on the additional display element 13, allowing the hearing specialist to track user input.

[0070] The setting value E is determined based on user input and transmitted to the hearing aid 4 for configuration. The hearing aid 4 is then delivered to the user. The setting value can be determined in each part of the processing units 12A and 12B.

[0071] Figure 2A , 2B A simple, graphically-assisted first embodiment is shown. Figure 3A , 3B A second embodiment is shown. What these two examples have in common is that an image 14 showing at least one environmental condition is displayed on the display element 8. In both embodiments, the user can select different environmental conditions.

[0072] According to Figure 2A In the first embodiment, image 14 is presented to the user as an overview image, showing different environmental situations, each related to a specific hearing scenario. The overview image is a real image, or at least an animated real image, showing general everyday situations. These are all represented by natural depictions of different hearing scenarios, such as playgrounds, concert halls, stadiums, restaurants, offices, road traffic, etc.

[0073] Figure 3A The second embodiment shown provides a drop-down menu that allows users to select different environmental conditions, and thus different hearing scenarios. Figure 3AThis shows the situation where the user has already made a selection. In this case, the user selected the listening scenario "Family Dinner".

[0074] According to Figure 2A In the first embodiment, the user selects a specific listening scene by clicking on one of the listening scenes shown in the overview image 14. For this purpose, the user selects segment 16. In such a case... Figure 2B The selected segment 16 is shown in the new detailed image 18. The example shown is a hearing scene "Children's Playground". This hearing scene includes several specific hearing scenarios that the user can select. The display element also shows an evaluation scale 20, which in this example is represented by different smiley face symbols. The user uses these smiley face symbols to input his or her self-assessment of his or her hearing ability for the selected specific hearing scenario. Based on the selection, a hearing value H is recorded for the selected hearing scenario. For example, a numerical value is assigned to each image symbol. For example, a higher value indicates worse hearing.

[0075] In the selected hearing scenario, the user preferably repeats the selection and self-assessment of a specific hearing condition (sound source) for different hearing situations. Additionally or alternatively, the user repeats the self-assessment for other hearing scenarios. This results in a large number of value pairs, each representing a specific hearing condition and its associated hearing value. Based on these value pairs, the initial setting value E for the hearing aid 4 is derived.

[0076] According to Figure 3A , 3B In the second embodiment, the first step is to select a hearing scenario. Based on... Figure 3A In the illustration, the user selects segment 16 to be highlighted in the image. In the second embodiment, this is done using a speckle technique, i.e., illuminating the selected segment in a cone-like manner, or darkening the rest of the image. An evaluation scale 20 is also shown in this embodiment, which the user can use to perform self-assessment and record hearing values ​​for specific hearing conditions. In Figure 3, as part of the "family dinner" hearing scenario, the specific hearing condition "male speech" is selected.

[0077] In the second embodiment, an additional rating scale 22 is shown, which the user can use to input an additional correlation value R. Based on the user's assessment, the correlation value R indicates the importance of that particular hearing condition, i.e., how important it is for the user to understand male speech.

[0078] In the first embodiment, this correlation value R is also implicitly recorded, i.e., it is recorded by the user's selection of different listening scenarios in the overview image 14. Based on the selected and unselected listening scenarios, the correlation value R can be implicitly derived.

[0079] Use the following process to evaluate user input:

[0080] a) User Category N

[0081] In the first step, users are assigned to user category N from a predefined user category. This assignment is based on the listening scenario selected by the user and / or the relevant value R input by the user for that individual listening scenario. Specific listening scenarios typically correspond to general sound sources, such as adult conversations, children's speech, traffic noise, music, birdsong, etc. Based on this information, conclusions about the user's habits can be drawn, allowing the user to be assigned to a user category. For example, they can be simply categorized as "active people" and "passive people."

[0082] b) Hearing loss category L

[0083] Users are also assigned to hearing loss category L. This assignment is based on value pairs obtained from user input (hearing status with assigned hearing values).

[0084] After a simple allocation process, the individual hearing values ​​entered by the user are summed to obtain a total value. This is a measure of a person's hearing impairment.

[0085] A more accurate process for assigning hearing loss to category L is applied, using weighting: a vector is assigned to each specific hearing condition (sound source). The vector consists of elements that act as weighting factors, with each weighting factor assigned to a hearing loss category. For example, such a vector consists of 2 elements:

[0086] v = (L1, L2)

[0087] in,

[0088] L1 is the weighted value for hearing loss category 1, such as broadband high-frequency hearing loss, and

[0089] L2 is a weighted value for hearing loss category 2, such as steep attenuation at high frequencies.

[0090] The following vectors can be assigned to different hearing conditions (sound sources), for example:

[0091] For listening comprehension scenario 1, such as "dialogue," V1 = (1.0, 0.2).

[0092] For hearing condition 2, such as "children's speech", V2 = (0.5, 0.5), and

[0093] For hearing condition 3, such as "bird calls", V3 = (0.2, 1.0).

[0094] For example, a first-time user with hearing loss in the 250Hz to 1kHz range and also in the 1kHz to 4kHz range due to moderate broadband high-frequency attenuation will generally have difficulty understanding conversations because human voices fall within the 1-4kHz range. Children's speech contains even higher frequency components, and bird calls are even higher. Therefore, this first-time user will experience the greatest limitations in conversations with people. Accordingly, he or she would, for example, assign a hearing value H1 = 4 for hearing case 1 (conversation), a hearing value H2 = 3 for hearing case 2 (child's speech), and a hearing value H3 = 2 for hearing case 3 ("bird calls"). The individual vectors are weighted, specifically multiplied by these hearing values ​​H1, H2, H3. Thus, the following vectors are added together to produce a total vector, whose elements are each formed by the total category value of the corresponding hearing loss category:

[0095] 4*V1 + 3*V2 + 2*V3 = (5.9; 4.2)

[0096] As can be seen, the assigned hearing values ​​are general results of assessments of users with broadband high-frequency hearing loss. In this respect, users are assigned to the hearing loss category "broadband high-frequency hearing loss".

[0097] Comparatively, for example, the second user is affected by "steep attenuation at high frequencies," resulting in almost no hearing impairment in the 250Hz to 1kHz range, but severe hearing impairment in the 1kHz to 8kHz range. Compared to the user in front, he has fewer problems communicating with adults. Relatively speaking, he is less able to hear children's speech, and his hearing loss is particularly noticeable when listening to birdsong. Accordingly, he will select the following hearing values, such as H1=0, H2=4, H3=5, which produce a total vector in the following vector summation:

[0098] 0*V1+4*V2+5*V3=(3.0;7.0).

[0099] Therefore, there is a total category value of 3.0 for the broadband high-frequency hearing loss category and a total category value of 7.0 for the high-frequency steep attenuation hearing loss category. This result is a general result for the assessment of individuals with high-frequency steep attenuation.

[0100] This weighted summation of hearing categories allows for a more differentiated assessment of hearing loss categories. These two users have a total score (the sum of their individual hearing scores) of 9, but different levels of hearing impairment.

[0101] c) Set value E

[0102] Finally, the setting value E is determined based on the hearing loss category L and / or user category N. In particular, a set of frequency-related gain settings is determined, and, if necessary, compression settings are determined. This is done, for example, by means of a lookup table or otherwise, such as by means of an algorithm, so the method is independent of the audio system used by the user.

[0103] A key feature of this method is the use of (only) predefined standard setting values ​​E, which are designed solely for different user categories N and / or different hearing loss categories L. Furthermore, the selection of these setting values ​​is based solely on user input. For example, hearing impairment is not measured by providing and evaluating sound samples.

[0104] d) Hearing procedure

[0105] In addition to the setting value E obtained in this way, it is preferable to select one or more specific listening programs, especially for listening scenarios or situations that the user assesses as critical. For example, if the user gives a negative assessment of their hearing in a specific listening scenario (e.g., "office" or "concert hall"), then a specific listening program for that listening scenario is selected from a predefined set of listening programs and stored. If the user makes a negative self-assessment of their hearing, such as if the hearing value exceeds a threshold, then the listening scenario or situation is considered negative. In the case of a listening scenario, for example, if one or more hearing values ​​entered by the user, or their sum for that listening scenario, exceed a specified total value, then a negative assessment is given. Specific listening programs are generally defined by a set of differential values. These differential values ​​provide the difference from the standard setting E. When such a listening program is activated, the standard setting is adjusted by the differential values. The listening program is also a predefined standard listening program that is not individually matched to the user.

[0106] Hearing aids are generally equipped with a classifier, which can identify different hearing scenarios or hearing conditions and then select the corresponding hearing program.

[0107] e) Hearing aids

[0108] In subsequent steps, a suitable hearing aid, or several suitable hearing aids, are determined based on user input. Preferably, both the determined user category N and hearing loss category L are considered. In the simplest case, a lookup table is used to select a hearing aid. In particular, the following factors are considered for hearing aid 4: design, size (shape factor), amplification, complexity, and ease of use. Therefore, hearing loss category L limits the selection of possible hearing aid types. If a person has severe hearing loss, then a powerful hearing aid is required. User category N also provides information about the user's lifestyle.

[0109] Generally, different types of hearing aids 4 are customized for different customer groups, and these different types of hearing aids 4 have specific features tailored to these specific customer groups. Therefore, based on the allocation of user category N, in addition to the basic setup, the following characteristics are also considered:

[0110] - Adaptive directional microphone,

[0111] - Noise suppression (microphone noise suppression, wind noise suppression, etc.)

[0112] - Sound smoothing, that is, a smoothing of sound edges that eliminates short, interfering peaks (such as a spoon hitting a coffee cup).

[0113] - Frequency compression, which transmits high-frequency speech components to a lower frequency range (which allows people with very severe hearing loss in the high-frequency range to hear these components in the lower frequency range).

[0114] Features beyond signal processing specifically include the following factors:

[0115] - Types of hearing aids (ITE, RIC, CIC, etc.)

[0116] - Shape and design of the casing

[0117] - Housing characteristics, such as color, dirt-resistant coating, splash-proof, and waterproof.

[0118] - Communication possibilities, such as operating the device using a remote control, using a smartphone as a remote control for the hearing aid; communicating with audio streaming devices, such as smartphones, to make calls, play music, etc.; and using the hearing aid as headphones / earphones.

[0119] f) Configuration and Delivery

[0120] The previously determined setting value E and the selected hearing program (if applicable) are then transmitted to the selected hearing aid 4 (or several hearing aids 4). This means that the selected hearing aid 4 is configured using the initial settings that allow the user to use the hearing aid 4.

[0121] The selected and pre-configured hearing aids are delivered to the user. In principle, several different hearing aids can be provided for selection.

[0122] List of reference numerals

[0123] 2 System

[0124] 4. Hearing aids

[0125] 6 Tablet computers

[0126] 8 Display elements

[0127] 10 Input Units

[0128] 11 Remote devices

[0129] 12A and 12B processing units

[0130] 13 Other display elements

[0131] 14 Images

[0132] 16 segments

[0133] 18 Detailed Images

[0134] 20 Evaluation Scale

[0135] 22 Other evaluation scales

[0136] E setting value

[0137] H hearing value

[0138] R correlation value

[0139] N User Categories

[0140] L Hearing loss category

Claims

1. A system (2) for interactively assisting a user in assessing hearing loss, comprising: - Display element (8) for presenting an image (14) having at least one environmental condition. - Input unit (10) for detecting user input and for selecting fragments (16) from the presented environment. - Processing units (12A, 12B) for controlling the display element (8) and processing the user input, wherein the processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to, a) Display the at least one environmental condition as a graphical representation of the environmental condition on the display element (8). b) Based on user input, identify and highlight the selected environmental context segment (16). c) Based on user choices, present specific hearing conditions graphically. d) Display the assessment scale (20) so that the user can input a self-assessed hearing value (H) for the user’s hearing ability for the specific hearing condition and record the hearing value (H) input by the user. e) Repeat steps a) to d), and record the hearing values ​​(H) for different specific hearing conditions, and f) Determine at least one setting value (E) of the hearing aid (4) based on the hearing value (H) input by the user, wherein no sound sample is presented for the determination of the at least one setting value (E), and wherein the at least one setting value (E) is determined solely by the user’s self-assessment for a specific hearing condition in different graphical representations.

2. The system (2) according to claim 1, the system includes a local device, the local device including at least a portion of the display element (8), the input unit (10) and the processing unit (12A, 12B).

3. The system (2) according to claim 2, wherein, The local device is a tablet computer (6) or a smartphone.

4. The system (2) according to claim 2, wherein the system includes a remote device having an additional display element (13), wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to display the same content on the display element (8) and the other display element (13).

5. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to highlight the selected segment (16) chosen by the user in the image (14).

6. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to represent several different environmental conditions in the image (14), the different environmental conditions representing different hearing scenarios, and can be selected by the user and displayed as a new detail image (14) to display the selected segment (16).

7. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to represent several different environmental conditions in the image (14), the different environmental conditions representing different hearing scenarios and being selectable by the user, and to display the selected segment (16) as a new detail image (14), and to provide different specific hearing conditions for the user to select.

8. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to, - For the selected specific hearing condition, an additional assessment scale (22) is displayed, allowing the user to input a correlation value (R) indicating the relevance of the specific hearing condition to the user, and the user-input correlation value (R) is recorded, and / or - Based on at least one segment selected by the user (16), conclusions are drawn about the relevance of different specific hearing conditions to the user.

9. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to provide defined user categories (N) and assign users to one of the stored user categories (N) based on the user's selection.

10. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to define hearing loss categories (L) and assign users to one of the hearing loss categories (L) based on hearing scores (H).

11. The system (2) according to claim 10, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to, for the assignment to hearing loss category (L), - The hearing scores (H) for various specific hearing conditions are summed to form a total value, and based on said total value, the allocation of one of the hearing loss categories (L) is affected, or - Assign each specific hearing condition to several hearing loss categories (L), and weight each hearing loss category (L) using a weighting factor. For each hearing condition, the hearing loss category (L) is weighted using the hearing value (H) input by the user for that hearing condition. Thus, for each specific hearing condition, a user-specific category value is obtained for each hearing loss category (L), and the assignment of one of the hearing loss categories (L) is influenced based on the user-specific category value.

12. The system (2) according to claim 10 or 11, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to derive a setting value (E) based on the assignment to the hearing loss category (L).

13. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to provide defined user categories (N) and assign users to one of the stored user categories (N) based on user selections, wherein the processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to determine critical hearing conditions based on the assigned user category (N) and / or based on specific hearing conditions assessed as critical by the user, select a specific hearing program from a set of defined hearing programs for the critical hearing conditions, and store it on the hearing aid (4).

14. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to select a suitable hearing aid (4) for the user based on the user's input, and to automatically perform initial settings on the hearing aid (4) based on the user's input.

15. The system (2) according to claim 1, wherein, The processing units (12A, 12B) are configured to select a suitable hearing aid (4) for a user based on the user category (N) assigned according to claim 9 and / or the hearing loss category (L) assigned according to claim 11, and to automatically perform initial settings on the hearing aid (4) based on user input.

16. A method for interactively assisting a user in assessing hearing loss, comprising: a) The environmental conditions are presented as a graphical representation of the environmental conditions on the display element (8). b) Based on user input, identify and highlight the selected environmental context segment (16). c) Based on user choices, present specific hearing conditions graphically. d) Display the assessment scale (20) so that the user can input a self-assessed hearing value (H) for the user’s hearing ability for the specific hearing condition and record the hearing value (H) input by the user. e) Repeat steps a) to d), and record the hearing values ​​(H) for different specific hearing conditions, and f) Determine the setting value (E) of the hearing aid (4) based on the hearing value (H) input by the user, wherein no sound sample is presented for the determination of the setting value (E), and wherein the setting value (E) is determined only by the user’s self-assessment for a specific hearing condition in different graphical representations.

17. A computer program product for interactively assisting a user in assessing hearing loss, the computer program product comprising instructions, when executed by a system according to claim 1, the system comprising a display element (8), an input unit (10), and a processing unit (12A, 12B), the instructions causing the system (2) to perform the following steps in response to user input: a) The environmental conditions are presented as a graphical representation of the environmental conditions on the display element (8). b) Based on user input, identify and highlight the selected environmental context segment (16). c) Based on user choices, present specific hearing conditions graphically. d) Display the assessment scale (20) so that the user can input a self-assessed hearing value (H) for the user’s hearing ability for the specific hearing condition and record the hearing value (H) input by the user. e) Repeat steps a) to d), and record the hearing values ​​(H) for different specific hearing conditions, and f) Based on the user-input hearing value (H), determine the setting value (E) of the hearing aid (4), where, No sound samples are presented for determining the setting value (E), and the setting value (E) is determined solely by a user’s self-assessment of a specific hearing condition for different graphical representations.

Images