Method and device for checking manifest data, electronic equipment and medium

Abstract

The application provides a kind of cabin list data verification method, device, electronic equipment and medium, the method comprises: in the case where determining that the transport mode information in the to-be-declared customs declaration form is the target transport mode, the first target cabin list corresponding to the to-be-declared customs declaration form is extracted;In the case where determining that the first container quantity and the second container quantity are not equal, the input identification information corresponding to the first container quantity is obtained;In the case where determining that the input identification information is not manually entered, the to-be-declared customs declaration form is updated using the second target cabin list.The cabin list data verification method, device, electronic equipment and medium provided by the application can perform relatively independent verification before customs declaration according to different trade transport modes, first use the container quantity recorded by both parties to perform coarse-grained verification, and then further perform fine-grained verification by checking the input method on the enterprise side, to avoid customs declaration failure and improve customs declaration business processing efficiency.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of intelligent customs technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus, electronic device, and medium for verifying manifest data. Background Technology

[0002] The manifest is the final confirmed information on the bill of lading for ocean freight export customs declaration. Upon arrival at the port of destination, the consignee must declare the cargo details to the port customs based on this manifest. The cargo description on the manifest must match the bill of lading held by the consignee; otherwise, the consignee will have difficulty clearing customs and taking delivery of the goods at the port of destination. When the consignee seeks a final tax refund, the customs declaration information must match the manifest; otherwise, a tax refund will not be possible.

[0003] During the assembly of import and export goods, key transportation information (such as the shipping company to which the container belongs, the container owner, the actual dimensions and gross weight of the container cargo, etc.) can only be entered correctly by the person. The enterprise side cannot verify key information such as container number and size. If there is any inconsistency, the declaration will fail and a new form must be entered, resulting in a low success rate and efficiency in the customs declaration process. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This invention provides a method, apparatus, electronic device, and medium for verifying manifest data, in order to address the shortcomings of low pass rate and efficiency in the existing customs declaration business process.

[0005] This invention provides a method for verifying manifest data, comprising:

[0006] If the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is determined to be the target mode of transport, the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared is extracted.

[0007] If it is determined that the number of the first container and the number of the second container are not equal, obtain the input identification information corresponding to the number of the first container;

[0008] If it is determined that the input identification information is not manually entered, the customs declaration to be declared is updated using the second target manifest;

[0009] The second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after that of the first target manifest; the target mode of transport is any mode of transport other than air transport; the quantity of the first container is recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared, and the quantity of the second container is recorded in the first target manifest.

[0010] According to a method for verifying manifest data provided by the present invention, the step of updating the customs declaration to be declared using a second target manifest includes:

[0011] Extract the first field information and the second field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively;

[0012] If all the information in the first field and the information in the second field overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared shall be updated using the information in the second field.

[0013] If at least one of the first field information and the second field information do not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be determined as having failed to be automatically filled.

[0014] The first field information and the second field information correspond one-to-one; the first field information is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest regarding the transported goods; the second field information is the field information that exists in both the first target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0015] According to a method for verifying manifest data provided by the present invention, after extracting the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared, the method further includes:

[0016] If the number of the first container and the number of the second container are determined to be equal, the third field information and the fourth field information are extracted from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively.

[0017] If all the information in the third and fourth fields overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have been successfully verified.

[0018] If at least one of the third and fourth field information does not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have failed verification.

[0019] The third field information and the fourth field information are in one-to-one correspondence; the third field information is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration form to be declared and the first target manifest regarding the transported goods; the fourth field information is the field information that exists in both the first target manifest and the customs declaration form to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0020] According to a manifest data verification method provided by the present invention, after obtaining the input identification information corresponding to the quantity of the first container, the method further includes:

[0021] If the input identification information is determined to be manually entered, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed as failing verification.

[0022] The method for verifying manifest data provided by the present invention further includes:

[0023] If the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is determined to be air transport, the third target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared is extracted.

[0024] Extract the fifth field information and the sixth field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest, respectively;

[0025] If all the information in the fifth and sixth fields overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have been successfully verified.

[0026] If at least one of the fifth and sixth field information does not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have failed verification.

[0027] The fifth field and the sixth field correspond one-to-one; the fifth field is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest regarding the transported goods; the sixth field is the field information that exists in both the third target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0028] According to a method for verifying manifest data provided by the present invention, after determining that the customs declaration to be declared has failed verification, the method further includes:

[0029] Place the customs declaration forms that failed verification at the top of the task list, and highlight the target configuration items in the task list.

[0030] The task list is used to store and manage the processing of customs declarations in the front-end interface.

[0031] The present invention also provides a device for verifying manifest data, comprising:

[0032] The first manifest acquisition module is used to extract the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration form when it is determined that the mode of transport information in the customs declaration form to be declared is the target mode of transport.

[0033] The first verification module is used to obtain the input identification information corresponding to the number of the first containers when it is determined that the number of the first containers and the number of the second containers are not equal.

[0034] The second verification module is used to update the customs declaration to be declared using the second target manifest if it is determined that the input identification information is not manually entered.

[0035] The second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after that of the first target manifest; the target mode of transport is any mode of transport other than air transport; the quantity of the first container is recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared, and the quantity of the second container is recorded in the first target manifest.

[0036] The present invention also provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the program to implement the manifest data verification method as described above.

[0037] The present invention also provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the manifest data verification method as described above.

[0038] The present invention also provides a computer program product, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the manifest data verification method as described above.

[0039] The present invention provides a method, apparatus, electronic device, and medium for verifying manifest data. In embodiments of the invention, a first target manifest belonging to the target mode of transport is extracted based on the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared. When the quantities of the first and second containers recorded on the enterprise side and the customs side differ, a decision is made that if the input identifier information corresponding to the quantity of the first container entered into the customs declaration to be declared is not manually entered, the latest issued second target manifest is used to update the customs declaration to be declared. This allows for relatively independent verification methods to be performed before customs declaration based on different modes of transport. First, coarse-grained verification is performed using the container quantities recorded by both parties, and then fine-grained verification is performed through self-checking the enterprise's input method. This ensures that the cargo information recorded in the customs declaration to be declared is consistent with the cargo information recorded in the latest manifest stored in the customs system, avoiding customs declaration failures due to human error and improving customs declaration processing efficiency. Attached Figure Description

[0040] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in this invention or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of this invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained from these drawings without creative effort.

[0041] Figure 1 This is one of the flowcharts illustrating the manifest data verification method provided by the present invention;

[0042] Figure 2 This is the second flowchart illustrating the manifest data verification method provided by the present invention;

[0043] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the manifest data verification device provided by the present invention;

[0044] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the electronic device provided by the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0045] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this invention clearer, the technical solutions of this invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some, not all, of the embodiments of this invention. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of this invention without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this invention.

[0046] The terms "first," "second," etc., used in this application are used to distinguish similar objects and not to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that such data can be interchanged where appropriate so that embodiments of this application can be implemented in orders other than those illustrated or described herein, and the objects distinguished by "first," "second," etc., are generally of the same class and the number of objects is not limited; for example, a first object can be one or more.

[0047] It should be understood that the terminology used in this specification is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to limit the invention. As used herein, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms.

[0048] The terms “comprising” and “including” indicate the presence of the described feature, whole, step, operation, element and / or component, but do not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, wholes, steps, operations, elements, components and / or collections thereof.

[0049] Figure 1 This is one of the flowcharts illustrating the manifest data verification method provided by the present invention. For example... Figure 1 As shown, the manifest data verification method provided in this embodiment of the invention includes: step 101, when it is determined that the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is the target mode of transport, extracting the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared.

[0050] The target mode of transportation refers to all modes of transportation other than air transport.

[0051] It should be noted that the entity executing the manifest data verification method provided in this embodiment of the invention is the manifest data verification device.

[0052] The application scenario of the manifest data verification method provided in this embodiment of the invention is as follows: during the customs declaration process, the manifest transmitted by the customs system is used to verify the goods to be declared before customs declaration, and the electronic customs declaration is sent to the customs system only after the goods information is correct.

[0053] The manifest data verification method provided in this application embodiment is applicable to customs brokers on the enterprise side to verify any customs declaration request they submit through the terminal equipment on which the device relies.

[0054] The aforementioned terminal devices can be implemented in various forms of electronic devices. For example, the electronic devices described in the embodiments of this application may include mobile terminals such as mobile phones, smartphones, laptops, digital broadcast receivers, PDAs (personal digital assistants), PADs (tablet computers), PMPs (portable multimedia players), navigation devices, smart bracelets, smartwatches, etc., as well as fixed terminals such as digital TVs, desktop computers, etc. Hereinafter, it is assumed that the electronic device is a mobile terminal. However, those skilled in the art will understand that, in addition to elements specifically designed for mobile purposes, the construction according to the embodiments of this application can also be applied to fixed-type terminals.

[0055] It should be noted that the manifest data verification device establishes a communication connection with the customs system through a designated interface to receive, in real time, the manifests for freight business belonging to the corresponding enterprise issued by the customs system.

[0056] Among them, a manifest refers to a paper cargo list or electronic data that accurately reflects the cargo and articles carried by a means of transport such as ships, aircraft, railway trains, and road vehicles entering or leaving the country, and is submitted or transmitted to the customs by the person in charge or his agent.

[0057] Before step 101, the customs broker on the enterprise side logs in with the corresponding username and password on the display interface of the equipment terminal, and performs corresponding operations on the corresponding controls on the front-end interface. Based on the task requirement of verifying the customs declaration that has been reviewed and automatically declared, the broker sends a verification request to the manifest data verification device.

[0058] Specifically, in step 101, the manifest data verification device receives and responds to the verification request sent by the front-end page, extracts the customs declaration to be declared based on the request, and compares and judges the information on the mode of transport recorded in the customs declaration to be declared:

[0059] If the mode of transport information indicates that the mode of transport for the trade goods currently being verified is any mode of transport other than air transport (i.e., the target mode of transport), then the first target manifest is extracted from the manifests continuously fed back by the customs system and is the manifest corresponding to the trade goods involved in the customs declaration to be declared when transported under the target mode of transport.

[0060] The target mode of transport includes, but is not limited to, shipping, rail transport, and road transport, excluding air transport. Furthermore, the first target manifest can represent information such as container details, bill of lading number, means of transport name, quantity, and weight corresponding to one or more of the aforementioned modes of transport used for freight operations.

[0061] If the mode of transport information indicates that the mode of transport for the trade goods currently being verified is air transport, then the manifest corresponding to the trade goods involved in the pending customs declaration when transported by air transport will be extracted from the manifests continuously fed back by the customs system, for subsequent execution and air transport judgment logic.

[0062] Step 102: If the number of the first container and the number of the second container are not equal, obtain the input identification information corresponding to the number of the first container.

[0063] The quantity of the first container is recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared, and the quantity of the second container is recorded in the first target manifest.

[0064] Specifically, in step 102, the manifest data verification device extracts the quantity of the first container recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the quantity of the second container recorded in the first target manifest from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively, and compares the container quantities recorded in the two documents:

[0065] If the number of the first container and the number of the second container are not equal, it indicates that there is an information asymmetry between the number of containers reported by the customs system for a certain trade and the number of containers recorded by the company itself. In this case, a self-inspection process is initiated to extract the input identification information corresponding to the method of entering the number of the first container from the system log.

[0066] If the number of containers in the first container and the number of containers in the second container are equal, it means that the number of containers reported by the customs system for a certain trade is consistent with the number of containers recorded by the company itself, and the remaining reported items can be verified.

[0067] Step 103: If it is determined that the input identification information is not manually entered, update the customs declaration form to be declared using the second target manifest.

[0068] The second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the second target manifest is received after the first target manifest.

[0069] Specifically, in step 103, the manifest data verification device uses the input identification information corresponding to the quantity of the first container recorded in the customs declaration to be declared as the basis for judgment and executes the enterprise's self-inspection process.

[0070] If the input identification information is not manually entered, it means that no personnel intervened during the entry process, and the erroneous values ​​were automatically filled in by the system based on the associated manifest. In this case, the information recorded in the latest second target manifest returned by the customs system for the same trade transaction should be used to update the customs declaration form accordingly, ensuring that the cargo information recorded in the customs declaration form is consistent with the cargo information recorded in the latest manifest stored in the customs system.

[0071] If the input information is entered manually, it means that there was human intervention in the input process and the error value was caused by human error. An alert can be issued on the front-end page in the form of a pop-up window or text.

[0072] This invention extracts a first target manifest belonging to the target mode of transport from the transport mode information in the customs declaration to be declared. When the quantities of the first and second containers recorded on the enterprise side and the customs side differ, a decision is made to update the customs declaration to be declared using the latest issued second target manifest if the input identifier information corresponding to the quantity of the first container entered into the customs declaration to be declared is not manually entered. This allows for relatively independent verification methods to be performed before customs declaration based on different modes of transport. First, coarse-grained verification is performed using the container quantities recorded by both parties, and then fine-grained verification is performed through self-checking the enterprise's input method. This ensures that the cargo information recorded in the customs declaration to be declared is consistent with the cargo information recorded in the latest manifest stored in the customs system, avoiding customs declaration failures due to human error and improving customs declaration processing efficiency.

[0073] Based on any of the above embodiments, updating the customs declaration to be declared using the second target manifest includes: extracting first field information and second field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively.

[0074] The first field information and the second field information correspond one-to-one; the first field information is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest regarding the transported goods; the second field information is the field information that exists in both the first target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0075] Specifically, in step 103, the manifest data verification device extracts the first field information actually recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the second field information actually recorded in the first target manifest from the customs declaration to be declared that is automatically filled in according to the first target manifest and the first target manifest.

[0076] The first field of information includes, but is not limited to, container information recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared (e.g., container number, specifications, identification, and weight, etc., which are used to characterize the container itself), bill of lading number, means of transport name, number of pieces, voyage number, and weight information.

[0077] The second field information includes, but is not limited to, container information recorded in the first target manifest (e.g., container number, specifications, identification, and weight, etc., information used to characterize the container itself), bill of lading number, means of transport name, number of pieces, voyage number, and weight information.

[0078] If all the information in the first field and the information in the second field overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared shall be updated using the information in the second field.

[0079] If at least one of the first field information and the second field information do not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be judged as failing the verification.

[0080] Specifically, the manifest data verification device compares the first and second field information of each group one by one in sequence:

[0081] If the contents recorded in the first and second fields of all pairs are completely identical, it means that the customs declaration form to be declared can be successfully filled by automatically extracting relevant content from the returned first target manifest. At the same time, new content can also be extracted from the new second target manifest that is returned in real time for updating.

[0082] If the contents recorded in at least one pair of first and second field information are completely identical, it means that the customs declaration form to be declared cannot automatically extract relevant content from the returned first target manifest for filling. In this case, an error message will be returned to indicate to the customs declarant that there is an error in the automatic filling function of the customs declaration form to be declared.

[0083] In this embodiment of the invention, when the input method corresponding to the first container quantity being entered into the customs declaration form is auto-fill, the first field information and the second field information recorded in the customs declaration form and the first target manifest are compared to verify the availability of the auto-fill function. This allows for testing and verification of the function of automatically entering relevant information from the manifest on the enterprise side, quickly pinpointing problems caused by the failure of the auto-fill function and improving the efficiency of customs declaration processing.

[0084] Based on any of the above embodiments, after extracting the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared, the method further includes: if the number of the first container and the number of the second container are determined to be equal, extracting the third field information and the fourth field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively.

[0085] The third field information and the fourth field information are in one-to-one correspondence; the third field information is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration form to be declared and the first target manifest regarding the transported goods; the fourth field information is the field information that exists in both the first target manifest and the customs declaration form to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0086] Specifically, after step 101, the manifest data verification device extracts the first field information recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the second field information recorded in the first target manifest from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively.

[0087] The third field information includes, but is not limited to, container information recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared (e.g., container number, specifications, identification, and weight, etc., which are used to characterize the container itself), bill of lading number, means of transport name, number of pieces, voyage number, and weight information.

[0088] The fourth field information includes, but is not limited to, container information recorded in the first target manifest (e.g., container number, specifications, identification, and weight, etc., which are used to characterize the container itself), bill of lading number, means of transport name, number of pieces, voyage number, and weight information.

[0089] If all the information in the third and fourth fields overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have been successfully verified.

[0090] If at least one of the third and fourth field information does not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed as failing the verification.

[0091] Specifically, the manifest data verification device compares the third and fourth field information of each group one by one in sequence:

[0092] If the contents recorded in the third and fourth fields of all pairs are completely identical, it means that the detailed contents recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest are also consistent. In this case, the customs declaration to be declared is deemed to have passed the verification. If there are no updates, the customs declaration can be submitted to the customs system after the document preparation process.

[0093] If at least one pair of third and fourth field information records completely identical content, it means that the detailed content recorded in the customs declaration to be declared is inconsistent with that in the first target manifest. Therefore, the customs declaration to be declared is deemed to have failed the verification and needs to be modified to make it consistent with the manifest content fed back by the customs system.

[0094] This invention extracts a first target manifest belonging to the target mode of transport from the transport mode information in the customs declaration to be submitted. When the number of first and second containers recorded on the enterprise side and the customs side are the same, a decision is made to conduct a thorough comparison of the contents recorded in the customs declaration to be submitted and the first target manifest, using the manifest as a reference to verify the customs declaration. This allows for coarse-grained verification using the container quantities recorded by both parties, followed by fine-grained verification using the specific content of both documents. This ensures that the cargo information recorded in the customs declaration to be submitted is consistent with the cargo information recorded in the latest manifest stored in the customs system, avoiding customs declaration failures due to incorrect declarations submitted to the customs system and improving the efficiency of customs declaration processing.

[0095] Based on any of the above embodiments, after obtaining the input identification information corresponding to the number of the first containers, the method further includes: if it is determined that the input identification information is manually entered, the customs declaration to be declared is determined to be a verification failure.

[0096] Specifically, after step 102, the manifest data verification device uses the input identification information corresponding to the quantity of the first container recorded in the customs declaration to be declared as the basis for judgment. If the input identification information is manually entered, it means that there is human intervention in the entry process and the error value is caused by human error. Therefore, it is determined that the customs declaration to be declared has failed the verification, and the content of the customs declaration to be declared is modified according to the prompt to make it consistent with the manifest record fed back by the customs system.

[0097] In this embodiment of the invention, when the quantities of the first and second containers recorded on the enterprise side and the customs side differ, if the input identifier information corresponding to the quantity of the first container entered into the customs declaration form is manually entered, the verification result is directly determined as verification failure. This can quickly locate human input errors and guide users to rectify the corresponding problems, thereby improving the efficiency of customs declaration processing.

[0098] Based on any of the above embodiments, the method further includes: if it is determined that the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is air transport, extracting the third target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared.

[0099] Specifically, the manifest data verification device receives and responds to the verification request issued by the front-end page, extracts the customs declaration to be declared based on the request, and if the mode of transport information recorded in the customs declaration to be declared indicates that the mode of transport for the trade goods currently being verified is air transport, then the manifest corresponding to the trade goods involved in the customs declaration to be declared transported by air transport is extracted from the manifests continuously fed back by the customs system as the third target manifest.

[0100] The fifth and sixth field information are extracted from the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest, respectively.

[0101] The fifth field and the sixth field correspond one-to-one; the fifth field is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest regarding the transported goods; the sixth field is the field information that exists in both the third target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0102] Specifically, the manifest data verification device extracts the fifth field information recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the sixth field information recorded in the third target manifest from the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest, respectively.

[0103] Since air transport does not involve the combination of containers, the fifth field of information includes, but is not limited to, the bill of lading number, number of pieces, and weight information recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared.

[0104] Similarly, the fifth field of information includes, but is not limited to, the bill of lading number, number of pieces, and weight information recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared.

[0105] If all the information in the fifth and sixth fields overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have been successfully verified.

[0106] If at least one of the fifth and sixth field information does not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed as failing the verification.

[0107] Specifically, the manifest data verification device compares the fifth and sixth field information corresponding to each group in turn:

[0108] If the information recorded in the fifth and sixth fields of all pairs is completely identical, it means that the detailed information recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest is also consistent. In this case, the customs declaration to be declared is deemed to have passed the verification. If there is no update, the customs declaration can be submitted to the customs system after the document preparation process.

[0109] If the contents recorded in at least one pair of fifth and sixth field information are completely identical, it means that the detailed contents recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest are inconsistent. Therefore, the customs declaration to be declared is deemed to have failed the verification and needs to be modified to make it consistent with the contents recorded in the manifest fed back by the customs system.

[0110] This invention extracts a third target manifest belonging to air transport from the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be submitted. It then directly compares the contents of the customs declaration to be submitted with the first target manifest, verifying the customs declaration against the shipping manifest. This allows for fine-grained verification of the specific content of both documents in air transport trade transactions, ensuring consistency between the cargo information recorded in the customs declaration to be submitted and the latest manifest stored in the customs system. This avoids customs declaration failures due to incorrect declarations submitted to the customs system, thus improving customs clearance efficiency.

[0111] Based on any of the above embodiments, after determining that the customs declaration to be declared has failed verification, the method further includes: placing the customs declaration to be declared that failed verification at the top of the task list, and highlighting the target configuration item in the task list.

[0112] The task list is used to store and manage the processing of customs declarations in the front-end interface.

[0113] It should be noted that each customs declaration form to be declared can be arranged in descending order of task creation time in a task list maintained in real time on the front-end page in the form of a task summary.

[0114] The task summary can be presented in various forms, including but not limited to task description information such as order number, proposal number, and proposal date.

[0115] Specifically, after each customs declaration is verified, the manifest data verification device forcibly sets the order of the failed customs declarations in the task list to "1" to place them at the top of the task list. Based on the comparison results obtained during the verification process, it locates the problem that caused the verification failure and highlights or uses another color to highlight the task summary content corresponding to the located problem in the task list to distinguish it from the parts where no abnormalities occurred.

[0116] The embodiments of the present invention do not specifically limit the implementation method of the manifest data verification method.

[0117] For example, Figure 2 This is the second flowchart illustrating the manifest data verification method provided by this invention. For example... Figure 2As shown in the figure, an embodiment of the present invention provides a specific implementation method for verifying manifest data:

[0118] (1) The manifest data verification device receives the manifest information issued by the customs system. At the same time, the operator in the previous step puts the automatically declared customs declaration into the queue built into the manifest data verification device.

[0119] (2) The manifest data verification device traverses each customs declaration to be automatically declared in the queue. Different comparison strategies are executed according to the mode of transport on the customs declaration.

[0120] (3) If the customs declaration is for air freight, only compare the bill of lading number, number of pieces, and weight information on the manifest with the information on the customs declaration. If they are inconsistent, give an explanation of the discrepancy.

[0121] (4) If it is a business other than air freight, first compare the number of containers recorded in the customs declaration with the number of containers recorded in the manifest.

[0122] (5) If the quantities are consistent, continue to compare the information of each container on the manifest with the information of the container on the customs declaration. Compare the bill of lading number, means of transport name, number of pieces, voyage number, weight information on the manifest with the corresponding information on the customs declaration. If they are all consistent, the verification passes; otherwise, return an error message.

[0123] (6) The discrepancy in quantity can be divided into two situations. If the container information on the customs declaration form contains information manually entered by the customs broker, an error message will be returned directly.

[0124] (7) If all container information is automatically filled in, continue to compare the bill of lading number, means of transport name, number of pieces, voyage number, and weight information between the manifest and the customs declaration. If the comparison is successful, the container data on the customs declaration will be automatically overwritten based on the new manifest information. If the comparison is inconsistent, an error message will be returned.

[0125] (8) Update the status of the task list based on the returned comparison information, and display the customs declarations that failed the comparison at the top to help customs brokers quickly understand the current status.

[0126] Understandably, successful, failed, and unprocessed verification tasks can also be distinguished in the task list by setting different colors for the entire line of text to differentiate the processing flow.

[0127] Based on the verification results, this invention prioritizes failed customs declarations in the task list and highlights the issues causing the failures. This allows for dynamic maintenance and management of the entire customs declaration verification process through the task list, facilitating the handling of verification tasks by customs brokers.

[0128] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the manifest data verification device provided by the present invention. Based on any of the above embodiments, such as... Figure 3 As shown, the device includes: a first manifest acquisition module 310, a first verification module 320, and a second verification module 330, wherein:

[0129] The first manifest acquisition module 310 is used to extract the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared when the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is the target mode of transport.

[0130] The first verification module 320 is used to obtain input identification information corresponding to the number of the first containers when it is determined that the number of the first containers and the number of the second containers are not equal.

[0131] The second verification module 330 is used to update the customs declaration to be declared using the second target manifest if it is determined that the input identification information is not manually entered.

[0132] The second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after that of the first target manifest. The target mode of transport is any mode of transport other than air transport. The quantity of the first container is recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared, and the quantity of the second container is recorded in the first target manifest.

[0133] Specifically, the first manifest acquisition module 310, the first verification module 320, and the second verification module 330 are electrically connected in sequence.

[0134] The first manifest acquisition module 310 receives and responds to the verification request sent by the front-end page, extracts the customs declaration to be declared based on the request, and compares and judges the information on the mode of transport recorded in the customs declaration to be declared:

[0135] If the mode of transport information indicates that the mode of transport for the trade goods currently being verified is any mode of transport other than air transport (i.e., the target mode of transport), then the first target manifest is extracted from the manifests continuously fed back by the customs system and is the manifest corresponding to the trade goods involved in the customs declaration to be declared when transported under the target mode of transport.

[0136] The first verification module 320 extracts the quantity of the first container recorded in the customs declaration to be declared and the quantity of the second container recorded in the first target manifest from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively, and compares the container quantities recorded in the two documents:

[0137] If the number of the first container and the number of the second container are not equal, it indicates that there is an information asymmetry between the number of containers reported by the customs system for a certain trade and the number of containers recorded by the company itself. In this case, a self-inspection process is initiated to extract the input identification information corresponding to the method of entering the number of the first container from the system log.

[0138] The second verification module 330 uses the input identification information corresponding to the number of containers in the first container recorded in the customs declaration form to be declared as the basis for judgment and executes the enterprise's self-inspection process.

[0139] If the input identification information is not manually entered, it means that no personnel intervened during the entry process, and the erroneous values ​​were automatically filled in by the system based on the associated manifest. In this case, the information recorded in the latest second target manifest returned by the customs system for the same trade transaction should be used to update the customs declaration form accordingly, ensuring that the cargo information recorded in the customs declaration form is consistent with the cargo information recorded in the latest manifest stored in the customs system.

[0140] Optionally, the second verification module 330 includes a first information extraction unit and a first comparison unit, wherein:

[0141] The first information extraction unit is used to extract the first field information and the second field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively.

[0142] The first comparison unit is used to update the customs declaration form to be declared using the second field information if all the first field information and the second field information overlap.

[0143] The first comparison unit is used to update the customs declaration form to be declared using the second field information if all the first field information and the second field information overlap.

[0144] The first field and the second field correspond one-to-one. The first field is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest regarding the transported goods. The second field is the field information that exists in both the first target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0145] Optionally, the device further includes a first information extraction module and a first comparison module, wherein:

[0146] The first information extraction module is used to extract the third field information and the fourth field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively, when the number of the first container and the number of the second container are determined to be equal.

[0147] The first comparison module is used to determine that the customs declaration form to be declared is successfully verified if all the information in the third field and the fourth field are identical.

[0148] The first comparison module is used to determine the customs declaration form to be declared as failing verification if at least one of the third field information and the fourth field information do not overlap.

[0149] Optionally, the device further includes a second comparison module, wherein:

[0150] The second comparison module is used to determine the customs declaration form to be declared as failing verification if it is determined that the input identification information was manually entered.

[0151] Optionally, the device further includes a second manifest acquisition module, a second information extraction module, and a third comparison module, wherein:

[0152] The second manifest acquisition module is used to extract the third target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared when it is determined that the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is air transport.

[0153] The second information extraction module is used to extract the fifth field information and the sixth field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest, respectively.

[0154] The third comparison module is used to determine that the customs declaration form to be declared is successfully verified if all the information in the fifth field and the sixth field are identical.

[0155] The third comparison module is used to determine the customs declaration form to be declared as failing verification if at least one of the fifth and sixth field information does not overlap.

[0156] The fifth field and the sixth field correspond one-to-one; the fifth field is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest regarding the transported goods; the sixth field is the field information that exists in both the third target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

[0157] Optionally, the device also includes a list update module, wherein:

[0158] The list update module is used to place the customs declaration forms that failed verification at the top of the task list and highlight the target configuration items in the task list.

[0159] The task list is used to store and manage the processing of customs declarations in the front-end interface.

[0160] The manifest data verification device provided in this embodiment of the invention is used to execute the manifest data verification method of the present invention. Its implementation method is the same as that of the manifest data verification method provided by the present invention, and can achieve the same beneficial effects, which will not be repeated here.

[0161] This invention extracts a first target manifest belonging to the target mode of transport from the transport mode information in the customs declaration to be declared. When the quantities of the first and second containers recorded on the enterprise side and the customs side differ, a decision is made to update the customs declaration to be declared using the latest issued second target manifest if the input identifier information corresponding to the quantity of the first container entered into the customs declaration to be declared is not manually entered. This allows for relatively independent verification methods to be performed before customs declaration based on different modes of transport. First, coarse-grained verification is performed using the container quantities recorded by both parties, and then fine-grained verification is performed through self-checking the enterprise's input method. This ensures that the cargo information recorded in the customs declaration to be declared is consistent with the cargo information recorded in the latest manifest stored in the customs system, avoiding customs declaration failures due to human error and improving customs declaration processing efficiency.

[0162] Figure 4 An example is a schematic diagram of the physical structure of an electronic device, such as... Figure 4 As shown, the electronic device may include: a processor 410, a communication interface 420, a memory 430, and a communication bus 440, wherein the processor 410, the communication interface 420, and the memory 430 communicate with each other through the communication bus 440. The processor 410 can call logical instructions in the memory 430 to execute a manifest data verification method, which includes: if the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is the target mode of transport, extracting a first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared; if the number of the first container and the number of the second container are not equal, obtaining input identification information corresponding to the number of the first container; if the input identification information is not manually entered, updating the customs declaration to be declared using the second target manifest; wherein the second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after the first target manifest; the target mode of transport is a mode of transport other than air transport; the number of the first container is recorded in the customs declaration to be declared, and the number of the second container is recorded in the first target manifest.

[0163] Furthermore, the logical instructions in the aforementioned memory 430 can be implemented as software functional units and, when sold or used as independent products, can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, essentially, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or a part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0164] On the other hand, the present invention also provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program that can be stored on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the computer can execute the manifest data verification method provided by the above methods. The method includes: when it is determined that the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is the target mode of transport, extracting a first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared; when it is determined that the number of first containers and the number of second containers are not equal, obtaining input identification information corresponding to the number of first containers; when it is determined that the input identification information is not manually entered, updating the customs declaration to be declared using the second target manifest; wherein the second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after the first target manifest; the target mode of transport is a mode of transport other than air transport; the number of first containers is recorded in the customs declaration to be declared, and the number of second containers is recorded in the first target manifest.

[0165] In another aspect, the present invention also provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program thereon. When executed by a processor, the computer program implements a method for verifying manifest data provided by the methods described above. This method includes: if the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is a target mode of transport, extracting a first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared; if the number of first containers and the number of second containers are not equal, obtaining input identification information corresponding to the number of first containers; if the input identification information is not manually entered, updating the customs declaration to be declared using a second target manifest; wherein the second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after that of the first target manifest; the target mode of transport is a mode of transport other than air transport; the number of first containers is recorded in the customs declaration to be declared, and the number of second containers is recorded in the first target manifest.

[0166] The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative. The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the modules can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs. Those skilled in the art can understand and implement this without any creative effort.

[0167] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that each embodiment can be implemented by means of software plus necessary general-purpose hardware platforms, and of course, it can also be implemented by hardware. Based on this understanding, the above technical solutions, in essence or the part that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as ROM / RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk, etc., and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute the methods described in the various embodiments or some parts of the embodiments.

[0168] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, and not to limit them; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications can still be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalent substitutions can be made to some of the technical features; and these modifications or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for verifying manifest data, characterized in that, include: If the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is determined to be the target mode of transport, the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared is extracted. If the number of the first container and the number of the second container are determined to be equal, the third field information and the fourth field information are extracted from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively. If all the information in the third and fourth fields overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have been successfully verified. If at least one of the third and fourth field information does not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have failed verification. If it is determined that the number of the first container and the number of the second container are not equal, obtain the input identification information corresponding to the number of the first container; If it is determined that the input identification information is manually entered, the customs declaration form to be declared will be judged as failing the verification. If it is determined that the input identification information is not manually entered, the customs declaration to be declared is updated using the second target manifest; wherein, the second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after that of the first target manifest; the third field information and the fourth field information correspond one-to-one; the third field information is the field information in the customs declaration to be declared that exists in common with the first target manifest regarding the transported goods; the fourth field information is the field information in the first target manifest that exists in common with the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods; the target mode of transport is any mode of transport other than air transport; the quantity of the first container is recorded in the customs declaration to be declared, and the quantity of the second container is recorded in the first target manifest.

2. The method for verifying manifest data according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of updating the customs declaration to be declared using the second target manifest includes: Extract the first field information and the second field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively; If all the first field information and the second field information overlap, the customs declaration to be declared is updated using the field information in the second target manifest that corresponds to the second field information. If at least one of the first field information and the second field information do not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be determined as having failed to be automatically filled. The first field information and the second field information correspond one-to-one; the first field information is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest regarding the transported goods; the second field information is the field information that exists in both the first target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

3. The method for verifying manifest data according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method also includes a verification step for air transport scenarios: If the mode of transport information in the customs declaration to be declared is determined to be air transport, the third target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration to be declared is extracted. Extract the fifth field information and the sixth field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest, respectively; If all the information in the fifth and sixth fields overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have been successfully verified. If at least one of the fifth and sixth field information does not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have failed verification. The fifth field and the sixth field correspond one-to-one; the fifth field is the field information that exists in both the customs declaration to be declared and the third target manifest regarding the transported goods; the sixth field is the field information that exists in both the third target manifest and the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods.

4. The method for verifying manifest data according to any one of claims 1-3, characterized in that, After determining that the customs declaration form to be declared has failed verification, the process also includes: Place the customs declaration forms that failed verification at the top of the task list, and highlight the target configuration items in the task list. The task list is used to store and manage the processing of customs declarations in the front-end interface.

5. A device for verifying manifest data, characterized in that, include: The first manifest acquisition module is used to extract the first target manifest corresponding to the customs declaration form when it is determined that the mode of transport information in the customs declaration form to be declared is the target mode of transport. The first verification module is used to extract the third field information and the fourth field information from the customs declaration to be declared and the first target manifest, respectively, when it is determined that the number of the first container and the number of the second container are equal. If all the information in the third and fourth fields overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have been successfully verified. If at least one of the third and fourth field information does not overlap, the customs declaration form to be declared will be deemed to have failed verification. If it is determined that the number of the first container and the number of the second container are not equal, obtain the input identification information corresponding to the number of the first container; The second verification module is used to determine that the customs declaration form to be declared has failed verification if it is determined that the input identification information is manually entered. If it is determined that the input identification information is not manually entered, the customs declaration to be declared is updated using the second target manifest; Wherein, the second target manifest and the first target manifest correspond to the same transaction order, and the receipt time of the second target manifest is after that of the first target manifest; the third field information and the fourth field information correspond one-to-one; the third field information is the field information in the customs declaration to be declared that exists in common with the first target manifest regarding the transported goods; the fourth field information is the field information in the first target manifest that exists in common with the customs declaration to be declared regarding the transported goods; the target mode of transport is any mode of transport other than air transport; the quantity of the first container is recorded in the customs declaration to be declared, and the quantity of the second container is recorded in the first target manifest.

6. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that, When the processor executes the program, it implements the manifest data verification method as described in any one of claims 1 to 4.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the manifest data verification method as described in any one of claims 1 to 4.

8. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the manifest data verification method as described in any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images