Method, device, processor and vehicle for handling wireless charging failure

Abstract

The application discloses a wireless charging fault processing method, processing device, processor and vehicle. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring the charging fault type of the vehicle; in the case of determining that the charging fault type is a wifi interruption fault, comparing the residual power of the power battery with the preset power to obtain a first comparison result; acquiring the frequency of the wifi interruption in the wifi interruption fault; generating a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and the frequency, wherein the control instruction set is used for controlling the fault processing module to execute a fault processing strategy, and the fault processing strategy comprises at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect the charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current, and continuously controlling the wifi to reconnect. In the application, the residual power of the power battery and the frequency of the wifi interruption are combined, the fault processing module processes the wifi interruption fault in real time, the charging is ensured to continue during the processing process, the charging efficiency is improved, and the charging experience of the user is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the technical field of vehicle charging, and more specifically, to a method, device, processor, and vehicle for handling wireless charging faults. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, the Wi-Fi environment at charging sites for electric vehicles equipped with wireless charging is complex, and Wi-Fi communication is frequently interfered with, resulting in charging interruptions. The industry typically uses fault alarms and shutdowns to indicate Wi-Fi interruption faults, requiring users to restart or stop charging after receiving the notification, leading to a poor charging experience.

[0003] There is currently no effective solution to the above problems. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This invention provides a method, device, processor, and vehicle for handling wireless charging faults, to at least solve the technical problem that after wireless charging is interrupted, charging needs to be started or stopped based on a Wi-Fi interruption fault prompt, resulting in a poor charging experience.

[0005] According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for handling wireless charging faults is provided, comprising: obtaining the charging fault type of a vehicle; if the charging fault type determines that it is a Wi-Fi interruption fault, comparing the remaining power of the power battery with a preset power level to obtain a first comparison result; obtaining the frequency of Wi-Fi interruption in the Wi-Fi interruption fault; generating a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and the frequency, the control instruction set being used to control a fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, wherein the fault handling strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0006] Optionally, a control instruction set is generated based on the first comparison result and the frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, including: when the remaining power of the power battery is greater than the preset power, generating a first target instruction in the control instruction set, wherein the first target instruction is used to control the vehicle to disconnect from charging.

[0007] Optionally, a control instruction set is generated based on the first comparison result and the frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy. It also includes: when the remaining power of the power battery is less than or equal to the preset power, comparing the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption with a frequency threshold to obtain a second comparison result; determining the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault based on the second comparison result; and generating a second target instruction in the control instruction set based on the fault level. The second target instruction is used to control the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously control the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0008] Optionally, based on the second comparison result, the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault is determined, including: based on the second comparison result, the fault level is divided into: a first fault level, a second fault level, and a third fault level, wherein the first frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the first fault level is less than the second frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the second fault level, the second frequency is less than the third frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the third fault level, the first charging current corresponding to the first fault level is greater than the second charging current corresponding to the second fault level, and the second charging current is greater than the third charging current corresponding to the third fault level.

[0009] Optionally, a control instruction set is generated based on the first comparison result and the frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy, and further includes: when the vehicle's charging current is reduced to the target charging current corresponding to the current fault level and the Wi-Fi reconnection is successful, restoring the vehicle's charging current to the calibrated charging current before the Wi-Fi interruption fault occurred.

[0010] Optionally, a control instruction set is generated based on the first comparison result and the frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy. It also includes: if the vehicle's charging current drops to the target charging current corresponding to the current fault level and the Wi-Fi reconnection fails, the current fault level is upgraded step by step until the Wi-Fi reconnection succeeds.

[0011] Optionally, a control instruction set is generated based on the first comparison result and the frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy, and also includes: controlling the vehicle to disconnect from charging when the current fault level is upgraded to the highest fault level and the Wi-Fi reconnection fails.

[0012] According to another aspect of the present invention, a wireless charging fault processing device is also provided, comprising: a first acquisition module, configured to acquire the charging fault type of a vehicle; a comparison module, configured to compare the remaining charge of a power battery with a preset charge level when the charging fault type determines that it is a Wi-Fi interruption fault, and obtain a first comparison result; a second acquisition module, configured to acquire the frequency of Wi-Fi interruption in the Wi-Fi interruption fault; and a generation module, configured to generate a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and the frequency, the control instruction set being used to control the fault processing module to execute a fault processing strategy, wherein the fault processing strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0013] According to another aspect of the present invention, a processor is also provided, which is configured to run a computer program to perform the above-described processing method.

[0014] According to another aspect of the present invention, a vehicle is also provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program and the processor is configured to run the computer program to perform the above-described processing method.

[0015] In this embodiment of the invention, when a Wi-Fi interruption fault occurs during vehicle charging, a first comparison result is obtained by comparing the remaining power battery charge with a preset charge level. Based on this first comparison result, the charging status of the power battery, i.e., whether it is fully charged, can be determined. Combining the first comparison result with the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions, the fault handling module executes a corresponding fault handling strategy. When the power battery is fully charged, the vehicle is disconnected from charging. When the power battery is not fully charged, the charging current is reduced and Wi-Fi reconnection is continuously controlled based on the specific frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions, ensuring continuous charging of the power battery and avoiding prolonged charging interruptions or requiring the user to restart charging after an interruption. This wireless charging fault handling method, combining the remaining power battery charge and the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions, allows the fault handling module to process Wi-Fi interruption faults in real time, ensuring continuous charging during the process, improving charging efficiency, and enhancing the user's charging experience. Attached Figure Description

[0016] The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and form part of this application, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention and, together with their description, serve to explain the invention and do not constitute an undue limitation thereof. In the drawings:

[0017] Figure 1This is a hardware structure block diagram of a computer terminal (or mobile device) for implementing a wireless charging fault handling method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0018] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a wireless charging fault handling method according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0019] Figure 3 This is a flowchart illustrating the classification of Wi-Fi interruption fault levels according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0020] Figure 4 This is a flowchart of an upgrade handling strategy for a Wi-Fi interruption fault according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0021] Figure 5 This is a structural block diagram of a wireless charging fault handling device in an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0022] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the present invention, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0023] It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," etc., in the specification, claims, and accompanying drawings of this invention are used to distinguish similar objects and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that such data can be interchanged where appropriate so that the embodiments of the invention described herein can be implemented in orders other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion; for example, a process, method, system, product, or apparatus that comprises a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units explicitly listed, but may include other steps or units not explicitly listed or inherent to such processes, methods, products, or apparatus.

[0024] Example 1

[0025] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method for handling wireless charging faults is provided. It should be noted that the steps shown in the flowchart in the accompanying drawings can be executed in a computer system such as a set of computer-executable instructions. Furthermore, although a logical order is shown in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps shown or described may be executed in a different order than that shown here.

[0026] Figure 1 This is a hardware structure block diagram of a computer terminal (or mobile device) for implementing a method for handling wireless charging faults according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown, a computer terminal (or mobile device) may include one or more processors 102 (processors may include, but are not limited to, central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), digital signal processing (DSP) chips, microprocessors (MCUs), programmable logic devices (FPGAs), neural network processors (NPUs), tensor processors (TPUs), artificial intelligence (AI) type processors, etc.) and a memory 104 for storing data. In addition, it may include a transmission device 106 for communication functions, an input / output device 108, and a display 110. Those skilled in the art will understand that... Figure 1 The structures shown are for illustrative purposes only and do not limit the structure of the computer terminal (or mobile device) described above. For example, a computer terminal may include more or fewer components than those described above, or have a different configuration than those described above.

[0027] The memory 104 can be used to store computer programs, such as application software programs and modules, like the computer program corresponding to the wireless charging fault handling method in this embodiment of the invention. The processor 102 executes various functional applications and data processing by running the computer program stored in the memory 104, thereby implementing the aforementioned wireless charging fault handling method. The memory 104 may include high-speed random access memory and may also include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic storage devices, flash memory, or other non-volatile solid-state memory. In some instances, the memory 104 may further include memory remotely located relative to the processor 102, and these remote memories can be connected to the mobile terminal via a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the Internet, corporate intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

[0028] The transmission device 106 is used to receive or send data via a network. Specific examples of the network described above may include a wireless network provided by the mobile terminal's communication provider. In one example, the transmission device 106 includes a Network Interface Controller (NIC), which can connect to other network devices via a base station to communicate with the Internet. In another example, the transmission device 106 may be a Radio Frequency (RF) module used for wireless communication with the Internet.

[0029] Display 110 may be a touchscreen liquid crystal display (LCD). This LCD allows a user to interact with the user interface of the mobile terminal. In some embodiments, the mobile terminal has a graphical user interface (GUI), which allows the user to interact with the GUI via finger contact and / or gestures on a touch-sensitive surface. Optional human-computer interaction functions include: creating web pages, drawing, word processing, creating electronic documents, playing games, video conferencing, instant messaging, sending and receiving emails, a call interface, playing digital video, playing digital music, and / or web browsing. Executable instructions for performing these human-computer interaction functions are configured / stored in one or more processor-executable computer program products or readable storage media.

[0030] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a wireless charging fault handling method according to one embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 2 As shown, the process includes the following steps:

[0031] Step S1: Obtain the vehicle's charging fault type.

[0032] Step S2: If the charging fault type is determined to be a Wi-Fi interruption fault, the remaining power of the power battery is compared with the preset power to obtain the first comparison result.

[0033] Step S3: Obtain the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions in the Wi-Fi interruption fault.

[0034] Step S4: Generate a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy. The fault handling strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect from charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0035] In this embodiment, when a Wi-Fi interruption fault occurs during vehicle charging, a first comparison result is obtained by comparing the remaining battery power with a preset battery power. Based on this first comparison result, the charging status of the battery, i.e., whether it is fully charged, can be determined. Combining the first comparison result with the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions, the fault handling module executes a corresponding fault handling strategy. When the battery power is fully charged, the vehicle is disconnected from charging. When the battery power is not fully charged, the charging current is reduced and Wi-Fi reconnection is continuously controlled based on the specific frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions, ensuring continuous charging of the battery and avoiding prolonged charging interruptions or requiring the user to restart charging after an interruption. This wireless charging fault handling method, combining the remaining battery power and the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions, allows the fault handling module to process Wi-Fi interruption faults in real time, ensuring continuous charging during the process, improving charging efficiency, and enhancing the user's charging experience.

[0036] It should be noted that there are multiple methods to obtain the vehicle's charging fault type in step S1. For example, the charging fault code displayed in real-time on the vehicle's screen can be used to determine whether the current fault is a Wi-Fi interruption fault. Alternatively, the operating status of the wireless communication module can be monitored in real-time by a monitoring device to determine whether the current fault is a Wi-Fi interruption fault.

[0037] Further, step S4 generates a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, including: when the remaining power of the power battery is greater than the preset power, generating a first target instruction in the control instruction set, wherein the first target instruction is used to control the vehicle to disconnect from charging.

[0038] It should be noted that the preset battery level is set based on the performance of the power battery, and can be any value greater than 90%. When the remaining battery level is greater than the preset level, it indicates that the power battery is fully charged. In this case, if the vehicle experiences a Wi-Fi interruption, there is no need to reconnect; simply disconnect the vehicle from charging. Specifically, when the remaining battery level is greater than the preset level, the priority of the first comparison result is higher than the priority of the Wi-Fi interruption frequency, and the fault handling module executes the corresponding target instruction based on the first comparison result.

[0039] Furthermore, step S4, which generates a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and the frequency, and the control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy, also includes: when the remaining power of the power battery is less than or equal to the preset power, comparing the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption with a frequency threshold to obtain a second comparison result; determining the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault based on the second comparison result; and generating a second target instruction in the control instruction set based on the fault level, the second target instruction being used to control the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously control the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0040] It should be noted that the preset battery level is set based on the performance of the power battery, and can be any value greater than 90%. If the remaining power battery level is less than or equal to the preset level, it indicates that the power battery is not fully charged. In this case, the vehicle experiences a Wi-Fi interruption fault and needs to reconnect to allow the power battery to continue charging until it reaches a full charge. The frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption is compared with a frequency threshold to determine the fault level. Based on the fault level, the charging current is reduced to ensure that the Wi-Fi can reconnect successfully within a preset time or the shortest possible time, thus keeping the power battery in a continuous charging state.

[0041] The process of determining the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault based on the second comparison result includes: dividing the fault level into a first fault level, a second fault level, and a third fault level based on the second comparison result. The first frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the first fault level is less than the second frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the second fault level, the second frequency is less than the third frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the third fault level, the first charging current corresponding to the first fault level is greater than the second charging current corresponding to the second fault level, and the second charging current is greater than the third charging current corresponding to the third fault level.

[0042] Specifically, an exemplary description is provided, such as... Figure 3As shown, the current vehicle charging fault is determined to be a Wi-Fi interruption fault. To avoid the risk of overcharging, it is determined whether the current remaining power battery charge is greater than a preset charge level, which is set to 99%. If the current remaining power battery charge is greater than 99%, priority processing is implemented, meaning the system directly enters the fault handling module and executes the corresponding fault handling strategy. If the current remaining power battery charge is less than or equal to 99%, the system enters the Wi-Fi interruption count module, which acquires the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions within a preset time period, which is set to 60 seconds. The first fault level is defined as 1-2 Wi-Fi interruptions within 60 seconds, the second fault level as 3-5 Wi-Fi interruptions within 60 seconds, and the third fault level as more than 5 Wi-Fi interruptions within 60 seconds. A lower number of interruptions corresponding to the first fault level indicates a milder fault. A higher number of interruptions corresponding to the third fault level indicates a more severe fault. To ensure successful Wi-Fi reconnection, the vehicle's charging current needs to be reduced to a lower value, or even reduced to 0.

[0043] Furthermore, step S4, which generates a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and frequency, and uses this control instruction set to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy, also includes: restoring the vehicle's charging current to the calibrated charging current before the Wi-Fi interruption fault occurred, provided that the vehicle's charging current decreases to the target charging current corresponding to the current fault level and Wi-Fi reconnection is successful. After successful Wi-Fi reconnection, the vehicle's charging current is restored to the calibrated charging current to ensure that the charging efficiency of the power battery is not affected.

[0044] Furthermore, step S4, which generates a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and frequency, and uses this control instruction set to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy, also includes: if the vehicle's charging current decreases to the target charging current corresponding to the current fault level, and Wi-Fi reconnection fails, the current fault level is escalated step by step until Wi-Fi reconnection succeeds. If Wi-Fi reconnection fails, it indicates that the vehicle's charging current may be too high and needs to be further reduced. Charging current derating control is performed according to the fault level to ensure that the charging current of the power battery is as close as possible to the rated charging current while ensuring successful Wi-Fi reconnection, thereby minimizing the impact on the charging efficiency of the power battery.

[0045] Furthermore, step S4 generates a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and the frequency. This control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy. It also includes: if the current fault level is escalated to the highest fault level and Wi-Fi reconnection fails, controlling the vehicle to disconnect from charging. If Wi-Fi reconnection still fails after the fault level is escalated to the highest fault level, it indicates that in addition to the Wi-Fi interruption fault, there may be other types of charging faults, and the vehicle needs further inspection and handling.

[0046] Combination such as Figure 4 The description is as follows: the first charging current corresponding to the first fault level is 50% of the rated charging current; the second charging current corresponding to the second fault level is 20% of the rated charging current; and the third charging current corresponding to the third fault level is 0. For Wi-Fi interruption faults, graded fault handling and escalation fault handling are implemented, and charging current derating control is applied according to the fault level, continuously attempting Wi-Fi reconnection. The specific steps are as follows:

[0047] Step 100: When the vehicle is in the first fault level, control the vehicle to reduce the charging current to 50% of the rated charging current, and continuously control the Wi-Fi to reconnect within a first duration. The first duration can be set according to actual needs, for example, the first duration can be set to 30 seconds. If the Wi-Fi reconnection is successful, the vehicle's charging current is restored to the rated charging current. If the Wi-Fi reconnection is unsuccessful, proceed to step 200.

[0048] Step 200: Upgrade the fault level to the second fault level, control the vehicle to reduce the charging current to 20% of the rated charging current, and continuously control the Wi-Fi to reconnect for a second duration. The second duration can be set according to actual needs, for example, the second duration can be set to 60 seconds. If the Wi-Fi reconnection is successful, restore the vehicle's charging current to the rated charging current. If the Wi-Fi reconnection is unsuccessful, proceed to step 300.

[0049] Step 300: If the Wi-Fi reconnection fails, the fault level is upgraded to the third fault level. The vehicle is controlled to reduce the charging current to 0, and the Wi-Fi is continuously controlled to reconnect for a third duration. The third duration can be set according to actual needs, for example, the third duration can be set to 60 seconds. If the Wi-Fi reconnection is successful, the vehicle's charging current is restored to the rated charging current. If the Wi-Fi reconnection fails, proceed to step 400.

[0050] Step 400: If the Wi-Fi reconnection fails, control the vehicle to stop charging and display the fault message on the instrument panel or the connected terminal.

[0051] In steps 1 to 4 above, charging continues during the fault handling process, ensuring charging efficiency. Only when the fault level is upgraded to the highest level and Wi-Fi reconnection fails will the vehicle be controlled to stop charging and the user will be notified, effectively improving the user's charging experience.

[0052] Example 2

[0053] According to another specific embodiment of this application, a wireless charging fault handling device is also provided, specifically as follows: Figure 5 As shown, the system includes: a first acquisition module 10, a comparison module 20, a second acquisition module 30, and a generation module 40. Specifically, the first acquisition module 10 is used to acquire the charging fault type of the vehicle. The comparison module 20 is used to compare the remaining power of the power battery with a preset power level when the charging fault type determines that it is a Wi-Fi interruption fault, and obtain a first comparison result. The second acquisition module 30 is used to acquire the frequency of Wi-Fi interruption in the Wi-Fi interruption fault. The generation module 40 is used to generate a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and the frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, wherein the fault handling strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current, and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0054] In this embodiment, the first acquisition module 10 determines that a Wi-Fi interruption fault has occurred during vehicle charging. The comparison module 20 obtains a first comparison result between the remaining power battery charge and the preset power charge. The second acquisition module 30 obtains the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption. The generation module 40 combines the first comparison result and the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption to control the fault handling module to execute the corresponding fault handling strategy. That is, when the power battery is fully charged, the vehicle is controlled to disconnect from charging. When the power battery is not fully charged, the vehicle is controlled to reduce the charging current and continuously control the Wi-Fi to reconnect based on the specific frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption, so as to ensure the continuous charging state of the power battery and avoid the power battery from being interrupted for a long time or requiring the user to restart charging after the interruption, thereby improving the user's charging experience.

[0055] Example 3

[0056] According to another specific embodiment of this application, a processor is also provided, which is configured to run a computer program to perform the above-described processing method.

[0057] In this embodiment, the processor can be configured to perform the following steps via a computer program:

[0058] Step S1: Obtain the vehicle's charging fault type.

[0059] Step S2: If the charging fault type is determined to be a Wi-Fi interruption fault, the remaining power of the power battery is compared with the preset power to obtain the first comparison result.

[0060] Step S3: Obtain the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions in the Wi-Fi interruption fault.

[0061] Step S4: Generate a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy. The fault handling strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect from charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0062] Example 4

[0063] According to another specific embodiment of this application, a vehicle is also provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program and the processor is configured to run the computer program to perform the above-described processing method.

[0064] In this embodiment, the processor can be configured to perform the following steps via a computer program:

[0065] Step S1: Obtain the vehicle's charging fault type.

[0066] Step S2: If the charging fault type is determined to be a Wi-Fi interruption fault, the remaining power of the power battery is compared with the preset power to obtain the first comparison result.

[0067] Step S3: Obtain the frequency of Wi-Fi interruptions in the Wi-Fi interruption fault.

[0068] Step S4: Generate a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and frequency. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute the fault handling strategy. The fault handling strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect from charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect.

[0069] The sequence numbers of the above embodiments of the present invention are for descriptive purposes only and do not represent the superiority or inferiority of the embodiments.

[0070] In the above embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of each embodiment have different focuses. For parts not described in detail in a certain embodiment, please refer to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0071] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed technical content can be implemented in other ways. The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for example, the division of units can be a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For instance, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the displayed or discussed mutual coupling, direct coupling, or communication connection may be through some interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection between units or modules may be electrical or other forms.

[0072] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0073] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of the present invention can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional unit.

[0074] If the integrated unit is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), portable hard drives, magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0075] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be noted that for those skilled in the art, several improvements and modifications can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these improvements and modifications should also be considered within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for handling wireless charging faults, characterized in that, include: Obtain the vehicle's charging fault type; If the charging fault type is determined to be a Wi-Fi interruption fault, the remaining power of the power battery is compared with the preset power to obtain a first comparison result. Obtain the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption in the aforementioned Wi-Fi interruption fault; Based on the first comparison result and the frequency, a control instruction set is generated. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy. The fault handling strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect from charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect. Based on the first comparison result and the frequency, a control instruction set is generated. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, and further includes: If the remaining power of the power battery is less than or equal to the preset power, the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption is compared with the frequency threshold to obtain a second comparison result; Based on the second comparison result, the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault is determined; Based on the fault level, a second target instruction is generated in the control instruction set. The second target instruction is used to control the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously control the Wi-Fi to reconnect. Based on the second comparison result, the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault is determined, including: Based on the second comparison result, the fault levels are divided into: a first fault level, a second fault level, and a third fault level. The first frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the first fault level is less than the second frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the second fault level, the second frequency is less than the third frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the third fault level, the first charging current corresponding to the first fault level is greater than the second charging current corresponding to the second fault level, and the second charging current is greater than the third charging current corresponding to the third fault level.

2. The processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Based on the first comparison result and the frequency, a control instruction set is generated. This control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, including: When the remaining charge of the power battery is greater than the preset charge, a first target instruction is generated in the control instruction set, wherein the first target instruction is used to control the vehicle to disconnect from charging.

3. The processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Based on the first comparison result and the frequency, a control instruction set is generated. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, and further includes: If the vehicle's charging current is reduced to the target charging current corresponding to the current fault level, and the Wi-Fi reconnection is successful, the vehicle's charging current will be restored to the calibrated charging current before the Wi-Fi interruption fault occurred.

4. The processing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Based on the first comparison result and the frequency, a control instruction set is generated. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, and further includes: If the vehicle's charging current drops to the target charging current corresponding to the current fault level, and Wi-Fi reconnection fails, the current fault level will be escalated step by step until Wi-Fi reconnection is successful.

5. The processing method according to claim 4, characterized in that, Based on the first comparison result and the frequency, a control instruction set is generated. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, and further includes: If the current fault level is upgraded to the highest fault level and the Wi-Fi reconnection fails, the vehicle will be disconnected from charging.

6. A device for handling wireless charging faults, characterized in that, include: The first acquisition module is used to acquire the charging fault type of the vehicle; The comparison module is used to compare the remaining power of the power battery with the preset power when the charging fault type is determined to be a Wi-Fi interruption fault, and to obtain a first comparison result. The second acquisition module is used to acquire the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption in the Wi-Fi interruption fault. A generation module is configured to generate a control instruction set based on the first comparison result and the frequency. The control instruction set is configured to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy. The fault handling strategy includes at least one of the following: controlling the vehicle to disconnect from charging, controlling the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously controlling the Wi-Fi to reconnect. Based on the first comparison result and the frequency, a control instruction set is generated. The control instruction set is used to control the fault handling module to execute a fault handling strategy, and further includes: If the remaining power of the power battery is less than or equal to the preset power, the frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption is compared with the frequency threshold to obtain a second comparison result; Based on the second comparison result, the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault is determined; Based on the fault level, a second target instruction is generated in the control instruction set. The second target instruction is used to control the vehicle to reduce the charging current and continuously control the Wi-Fi to reconnect. Based on the second comparison result, the fault level of the Wi-Fi interruption fault is determined, including: Based on the second comparison result, the fault levels are divided into: a first fault level, a second fault level, and a third fault level. The first frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the first fault level is less than the second frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the second fault level, the second frequency is less than the third frequency of the Wi-Fi interruption corresponding to the third fault level, the first charging current corresponding to the first fault level is greater than the second charging current corresponding to the second fault level, and the second charging current is greater than the third charging current corresponding to the third fault level.

7. A processor, characterized in that, The processor is used to run a program, and the processor is configured to run a computer program to perform the processing method according to any one of claims 1-5.

8. A vehicle comprising a memory and a processor, characterized in that, The memory stores a computer program, and the processor is configured to run the computer program to perform the processing method according to any one of claims 1-5.

Images