A construction drawing paper examination result accurate feedback method and system

Abstract

The application relates to a construction drawing paper examination result accurate feedback method, and relates to the technical field of drawing examination.The method comprises the following steps: obtaining input drawing information, the input drawing information comprising the attribution name of input drawing, the input drawing number and the input drawing quantity; obtaining examiner information, the examiner information comprising the examiner ID and the examiner working time; according to the examiner identity information, the unexamined drawing quantity corresponding to the examiner ID is called; the preset drawing examination quantity corresponding to the examiner ID is inquired from a preset database; the unexamined drawing quantity and the preset drawing examination quantity are compared; if the unexamined drawing quantity is less than the preset drawing examination quantity, the difference between the preset drawing examination quantity and the unexamined drawing quantity is obtained, and the difference is used as the obtainable drawing quantity; according to the obtainable drawing quantity, a drawing obtaining instruction is generated and executed, and the drawing obtaining instruction is used for the examiner to obtain the input drawing quantity corresponding to the obtainable drawing quantity. The application has the effect of improving the accuracy of drawing examination results.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of drawing review technology, and in particular to a method for accurately providing feedback on the results of construction drawing review. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, the review of construction drawing design documents refers to the review conducted by construction drawing review agencies recognized by the construction authorities in accordance with relevant laws and regulations on the content of construction drawings that involves public interests, public safety, and mandatory standards for engineering construction.

[0003] For related technologies, please refer to Chinese Patent No. CN103530762A, which discloses an electronic examination system and method for construction drawings. The system includes a management terminal server, peripheral terminal servers, and wireless communication transmitters / receivers. The management terminal server is equipped with a database of original data, an examination benchmark database, an examination personnel expert database, and six subsystems including an archive system, statistical reporting, online communication, internal management, system settings, and system management.

[0004] Regarding the aforementioned technologies, when examiners are assigned a large number of drawings, the workload for review becomes substantial, increasing the likelihood of review errors and resulting in lower accuracy of the review results received by users. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To improve the accuracy of drawing review results, this application provides a method for accurate feedback of construction drawing review results.

[0006] This application provides a method for accurately providing feedback on the review results of construction drawings, employing the following technical solution: A method for accurately providing feedback on construction drawing review results includes the following steps: Obtain the input drawing information, which includes the name of the drawing, the drawing number, and the number of drawings. Obtain examiner information, including examiner ID and examiner working hours; Based on the examiner's identity information, retrieve the number of unexamined drawings corresponding to the examiner's ID; Retrieve the preset number of drawings reviewed corresponding to the reviewer ID from the preset database; Compare the number of unreviewed drawings with the planned number of reviewed drawings; If the number of unreviewed drawings is less than the preset number of reviewed drawings, the difference between the preset number of reviewed drawings and the number of unreviewed drawings is obtained, and the difference is taken as the number of drawings that can be obtained. Based on the number of available drawings, a drawing retrieval instruction is generated and executed. The drawing retrieval instruction is used by the examiner to retrieve the number of input drawings corresponding to the number of available drawings.

[0007] By adopting the above technical solution, the system obtains the user's input drawing information and automatically retrieves the reviewer information. The system retrieves the number of unreviewed drawings corresponding to the reviewer ID and compares it with the preset number of drawings to be reviewed in the database. If the number of unreviewed drawings is less than the preset number of drawings to be reviewed, the system determines that the reviewer can review other drawings. The system then obtains the number of available drawings from the input drawings for review, thereby achieving reasonable allocation of drawings. This helps reduce the workload of reviewers, decreases the occurrence of review errors, and improves the accuracy of drawing review.

[0008] Optional, drawing retrieval commands include: Retrieve the unreviewed drawing information corresponding to the examiner ID. The unreviewed drawing information includes the name to which the unreviewed drawing belongs. Compare the attribution names of the unreviewed drawings with the attribution names of the input drawings. If the attribution names of the input drawings contain the same attribution name as the attribution name of the unreviewed drawings, the same attribution names are considered as belonging to the same category, and different attribution names are considered as belonging to different categories. Retrieve the input drawing number and the examiner ID corresponding to the same name; Based on the input drawing number corresponding to the same name and the examiner ID corresponding to the same name, a corresponding allocation instruction is generated and executed. The corresponding allocation instruction is used to assign the input drawing corresponding to the same name to the examiner corresponding to the same name.

[0009] By adopting the above technical solution, the system automatically obtains the ownership name of the unreviewed drawings, searches for drawings with the same ownership name as the input drawings among the unreviewed drawings currently held by the reviewer, and assigns the drawings with the same ownership name to the reviewer if they exist. This makes it easier for the reviewer to review drawings with the same ownership name and improves the efficiency of drawing review.

[0010] Optionally, after generating and executing the corresponding allocation instructions, the following can be included: Retrieve the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name; Compare the number of input drawings corresponding to the same category name with the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID; If the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID is less than the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name, the difference between the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name and the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID is obtained, and the difference is used as the number of additional drawings. Based on the number of additional drawings, generate and execute drawing rejection instructions. Drawing rejection instructions are used to reject drawings with non-corresponding names that are the same number of examiner IDs as the number of additional drawings. Generate and execute a drawing assignment instruction with the same name. The drawing assignment instruction with the same name is used to assign drawings with the same name to the examiners corresponding to the same name.

[0011] By adopting the above technical solution, the system detects that the number of drawings with the same name is higher than the number of drawings that the examiner can obtain. It obtains the difference between the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name and the number of drawings that can be obtained corresponding to the examiner ID, removes drawings that are equal to the difference from the drawings that the examiner has not reviewed, and obtains drawings with the same name. This helps to reduce the increase in the workload of examiners and further reduces the phenomenon of examiner review errors.

[0012] Optionally, after generating and executing a drawing retrieval command based on the number of available drawings, the following may be included: Get the total number of drawings corresponding to the examiner ID. The total number of drawings is the number of drawings uploaded after the examiner has completed the review. Retrieve the number of pre-defined drawings corresponding to the examiner ID from the pre-defined database; Compare the total number of drawings with the preset number of drawings; If the total number of drawings is greater than the preset number of drawings, a random sampling instruction corresponding to the examiner ID is generated and executed. The random sampling instruction is used to randomly select drawings from the total number of drawings corresponding to the examiner ID. Obtain the drawings to be inspected, generate and execute the drawing to be inspected sending command. The drawing to be inspected sending command is used to send randomly selected drawings to the quality inspector.

[0013] By adopting the above technical solution, the system obtains the number of drawings uploaded after the reviewer has completed the review, compares the total number of drawings with the preset number of drawings, and if the total number of drawings is greater than the preset number of drawings, the system randomly selects drawings from the total number of drawings and sends the selected drawings to the quality inspector for quality inspection, which helps to improve the accuracy of drawing review.

[0014] Optionally, after obtaining the drawings to be inspected, generating the drawings to be inspected, sending the instructions, and executing them, the process includes: Obtain the quality inspection results, which include those that pass and fail the quality inspection. If the quality inspection is qualified, a qualified prompt instruction is generated and executed. The qualified prompt instruction is used to notify the quality inspector that the quality has been qualified. If the quality inspection fails, a random re-inspection instruction corresponding to the examiner ID is generated and executed. The random re-inspection instruction is used to draw drawings again from the total number of drawings corresponding to the examiner ID. Obtain the drawings to be re-inspected, generate and execute the drawing re-inspection sending command, which is used to send the drawings to be re-inspected to the quality inspector; Based on the quality inspection failure, a failure notification instruction is generated and executed. The failure notification instruction is used to notify the quality inspector that the quality is not up to standard.

[0015] By adopting the above technical solution, the system obtains the quality inspection results from the quality inspector. If the quality inspection is qualified, the system automatically prompts the reviewer that the reviewed drawings have passed the quality inspection. If the quality inspection is unqualified, the system randomly selects drawings from the drawings reviewed by the reviewer for re-inspection. At the same time, if the quality inspection is unqualified, the system automatically prompts the reviewer that the drawing review result is unqualified, which further facilitates the improvement of the accuracy of drawing review.

[0016] Optionally, after generating and executing a non-conformance notification instruction based on a quality inspection failure, the following may be included: Obtaining substandard drawings; Based on the non-conforming drawings, generate and execute a non-conforming drawing review instruction. The non-conforming drawing review instruction is used to prompt the examiner corresponding to the non-conforming drawings to review the non-conforming drawings. Obtain annotations for non-compliant drawings; Generate and execute annotation prompts. These prompts are used to inform the reviewer of the reasons why the drawings are not up to standard.

[0017] By adopting the above technical solution, the system automatically acquires non-conforming drawings and sends them to the inspector, prompting the inspector to review the non-conforming drawings. When acquiring non-conforming drawings, the system automatically acquires the quality inspector's annotations on the non-conforming drawings and sends the annotations and non-conforming drawings together to the inspector, which helps the inspector understand the reasons for non-conformity and improves the efficiency and accuracy of re-inspection.

[0018] Optionally, after generating and executing a drawing retrieval command based on the number of available drawings, the following may be included: Obtain information on reviewed drawings, including the name of the reviewed drawings and the review results, which include whether the review was passed or not. Based on the ownership name of the approved drawings, generate and execute the drawing collection instruction. The drawing collection instruction is used to collect the approved drawings according to their ownership name. Get the number of drawings that failed the review corresponding to the ownership name of the reviewed drawings; Query the preset number of drawings that do not pass the preset database; Compare the number of drawings that failed the review with the preset number of drawings that failed; If the number of drawings that fail the review exceeds the preset number of drawings that fail the review, a drawing sampling inspection instruction will be generated and executed. The drawing sampling inspection instruction is used to randomly retrieve the drawings that fail the review and whose names correspond to the approved drawings, and send them to the quality inspector.

[0019] By adopting the above technical solution, the system automatically categorizes the reviewed drawings according to their ownership names. The system obtains the number of drawings that failed the review corresponding to the ownership name, compares the number of drawings that failed the review with the preset number of drawings that failed the review. If the number of drawings that failed the review is greater than the preset number of drawings that failed the review, the system randomly selects drawings from the list of drawings that failed the review and sends them to the quality inspector for quality inspection, thereby improving the accuracy of the drawing review.

[0020] Secondly, this application provides a precise feedback system for construction drawing review results, which adopts the following technical solution: The drawing information acquisition module is used to acquire input drawing information; The examiner information acquisition module is used to acquire examiner information; The drawing assignment module is used to assign input drawings to reviewers.

[0021] By adopting the above technical solutions, the drawing information acquisition module obtains the ownership name, number, and quantity of the input drawings; the reviewer information acquisition module obtains the reviewer ID and working hours; and the drawing allocation module allocates the input drawings according to the number of available drawings corresponding to the reviewer ID. This helps to reduce the phenomenon of reviewers reviewing too many drawings, achieves reasonable allocation of drawings, reduces the workload of reviewers, reduces review errors, and improves the accuracy of drawing review.

[0022] Thirdly, this application provides a smart terminal that adopts the following technical solution: it includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program that can be loaded and executed by the processor, such as any of the above-mentioned methods for accurately feeding back the results of construction drawing review.

[0023] Fourthly, this application provides a computer-readable storage medium that employs the following technical solution: storing a computer program capable of being loaded by a processor and executing any of the above-mentioned methods for accurately feeding back the results of construction drawing review.

[0024] In summary, this application includes at least one of the following beneficial technical effects of the method for accurately providing feedback on construction drawing review results: 1. The system obtains the user's input drawing information and automatically retrieves the reviewer information. The system retrieves the number of unreviewed drawings corresponding to the reviewer ID and compares it with the preset number of drawings to be reviewed in the database. If the number of unreviewed drawings is less than the preset number of drawings to be reviewed, the system determines that the reviewer can review other drawings. The system then obtains the number of available drawings from the input drawings for review, thereby achieving reasonable allocation of drawings. This helps reduce the workload of reviewers, decreases the occurrence of review errors, and improves the accuracy of drawing review. Attached Figure Description

[0025] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for accurately providing feedback on the results of construction drawing review.

[0026] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a sub-step S107 in one embodiment of this application.

[0027] Figure 3 This is a supplementary flowchart to the method for accurately providing feedback on the review results of construction drawings in this application.

[0028] Figure 4 This is a supplementary flowchart to the method for accurately providing feedback on the review results of construction drawings in this application.

[0029] Figure 5 This is a flowchart of a sub-step of S305 in one embodiment of this application.

[0030] Figure 6 This is a supplementary flowchart to the method for accurately providing feedback on the review results of construction drawings in this application.

[0031] Figure 7 This is a supplementary flowchart to the method for accurately providing feedback on the review results of construction drawings in this application.

[0032] Figure 8 This application embodiment is a module block diagram for accurately feeding back the review results of construction drawings.

[0033] Explanation of reference numerals in the attached drawings: 1. Drawing information acquisition module; 2. Reviewer information acquisition module; 3. Drawing allocation module; 4. Related name allocation module; 5. Drawing rejection module; 6. Drawing quality inspection module; 7. Drawing re-inspection module. Detailed Implementation

[0034] The present application will be further described in detail below with reference to all the accompanying drawings.

[0035] This application discloses a method and system for accurate feedback of construction drawing review results. This method adds a drawing allocation function to the drawing review, which enables reasonable allocation of actual drawings, helps reduce the workload of reviewers, reduces the phenomenon of reviewer errors, and improves the accuracy of drawing review.

[0036] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 1 A method for accurately providing feedback on the review results of construction drawings, the method comprising the following steps: S101. Obtain input drawing information; S102. Obtain examiner information; Specifically, the system obtains the drawing information entered by the staff, including the name of the drawing, the drawing number, and the number of drawings, and also obtains the reviewer ID.

[0037] S103. Retrieve the number of unexamined drawings corresponding to the examiner ID; S104. Query the preset number of drawings reviewed corresponding to the reviewer ID from the preset database; Specifically, the system automatically retrieves the number of unreviewed drawings corresponding to the examiner ID. Taking 5 as an example, the system also queries the preset number of drawings to be reviewed corresponding to the examiner ID from the preset database. Taking 8 as an example, the preset number of drawings to be reviewed is 8.

[0038] S105. Compare the number of unreviewed drawings with the number of pre-reviewed drawings; S106. If the number of unreviewed drawings is less than the preset number of reviewed drawings, obtain the number of available drawings. S107. Generate and execute drawing acquisition instructions based on the number of available drawings.

[0039] Specifically, the system automatically compares the number of unreviewed drawings with the preset number of drawings to be reviewed. If the preset number of drawings to be reviewed is greater than the number of unreviewed drawings, the system automatically obtains the difference between the preset number of reviewed drawings and the number of unreviewed drawings, which is the number of drawings that can be obtained. If the number of drawings that can be obtained is 3, the system executes the drawing acquisition instruction, retrieves 3 drawings from the input drawings, and sends the drawings to the reviewer. This achieves reasonable allocation of drawings, which helps to reduce the workload of reviewers, reduce the occurrence of review errors, and improve the accuracy of drawing review.

[0040] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 2 To improve the efficiency of drawing review, S107 includes the following steps: S1071. Obtain unexamined drawing information corresponding to the examiner ID; S1072. Compare the ownership name of the unreviewed drawing with the ownership name of the entered drawing; S1073. Obtain the input drawing number and the examiner ID corresponding to the same name; S1074. Generate and execute the corresponding assignment instructions based on the input drawing number and the examiner ID corresponding to the same name.

[0041] Specifically, the system automatically obtains the ownership name of the unreviewed drawing corresponding to the examiner ID, and automatically compares the ownership name of the unreviewed drawing with the ownership name of the input drawing. If the ownership name of the input drawing is the same as the ownership name of the unreviewed drawing, the same ownership name is considered a common ownership name (e.g., A). Different ownership names are considered non-common ownership names. The system automatically obtains the input drawing number corresponding to the common ownership name (e.g., A1, A2, A3). If the unreviewed drawing contains A1, the system automatically executes the corresponding allocation instruction, assigning drawings A2 and A3 to that examiner for review. This facilitates the examiner's review of drawings with the same ownership name and improves the efficiency of drawing review.

[0042] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 3 To further reduce examiner errors, the following specific steps are included after step S1074: S201. Obtain the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name; S202. Compare the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name with the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID; S203. Obtain the difference between the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name and the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID; S204. Generate and execute drawing rejection instructions; S205. Generate and execute the drawing assignment instruction with the same name; When allocating the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name, the system automatically compares the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name with the number of drawings available to the examiner ID. If the system detects that the number of vertically related drawings is higher than the number of drawings available to the examiner, it automatically calculates the difference, which is used as the additional drawing quantity. Taking the additional drawing quantity as an example of 1, the system executes a drawing rejection instruction based on the additional drawing quantity. The system rejects non-related name drawings from the examiner's unprocessed drawings, with a rejection quantity of 1. Then, the drawings with the same name are reassigned to the examiner. This helps to reduce the increased workload of examiners and further reduces the occurrence of examiner review errors.

[0043] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 4 To improve the accuracy of drawing review, the following steps are included after step S107: S301. Obtain the total number of drawings corresponding to the examiner ID; S302. Query the number of preset drawings corresponding to the examiner ID from the preset database; S303. Compare the total number of drawings with the preset number of drawings; S304. If the total number of drawings is greater than the preset number of drawings, a random sampling instruction corresponding to the examiner ID will be generated and executed. S305. Obtain the drawing to be inspected, generate the drawing to be inspected, send the instruction and execute it.

[0044] Specifically, the system automatically obtains the number of drawings uploaded after the reviewer completes the review. This number of drawings is the total number of drawings. Taking 8 as an example, the system queries the preset database for the preset number of drawings corresponding to the reviewer ID. Taking 7 as an example, the system compares the total number of drawings with the preset number of drawings. The system then executes a random sampling instruction, randomly selecting drawings from the total number of drawings. Finally, it executes a sending instruction for the drawings to be inspected, sending the selected drawings to the quality inspector for quality testing. This helps improve the accuracy of drawing review.

[0045] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 5 To further improve the accuracy of drawing review, the following specific steps are included after step S305: S3051. Obtain quality inspection results; S3052. If the quality inspection is qualified, generate a qualified prompt instruction and execute it; S3053. If the quality inspection fails, a random re-inspection instruction corresponding to the inspector ID will be generated and executed. S3054. Obtain the drawing to be re-inspected, generate a command to send the drawing for re-inspection, and execute it. S3055. Generate and execute the non-compliance warning instruction.

[0046] Specifically, the system obtains the quality inspection results from the quality inspector. If the quality inspection is qualified, the system executes the qualified prompt instruction, and the system automatically prompts the reviewer that the quality inspection drawing has passed the quality inspection. If the quality inspection is unqualified, the system executes the random re-inspection instruction, randomly selects drawings from the drawings reviewed by the reviewer, and sends them to the quality inspector for re-inspection. At the same time, if the quality inspection result is unqualified, the system automatically prompts the reviewer that the result is unqualified, which further improves the accuracy of drawing review.

[0047] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 6 To help the auditor understand the reasons for non-compliance, the following steps are included after step S3055: S401. Obtain non-conforming drawings; S402. Generate and execute a review instruction for non-conforming drawings; S403. Obtain annotations for non-conforming drawings; S404. Generate and execute comment prompts.

[0048] Specifically, after the quality inspector uploads the non-conforming drawings, the system automatically retrieves the non-conforming drawings and executes the non-conforming drawing review instruction, sending the non-conforming drawings to the inspector and prompting the inspector to review the non-conforming drawings. When the system retrieves the non-conforming drawings, it automatically retrieves the quality inspector's annotations on the non-conforming drawings and executes the annotation prompt instruction, sending the annotations and non-conforming drawings together to the inspector. This facilitates the inspector's understanding of the reasons for the non-conformity and helps improve the efficiency and accuracy of the re-inspection.

[0049] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 7 To improve the accuracy of drawing review, the following specific steps are included after step S107: S501. Obtain information on approved drawings; S502. Generate and execute drawing collection instructions; S503. Obtain the number of drawings that failed the review corresponding to the ownership name of the reviewed drawings; S504. Query the preset number of non-passing drawings from the preset database; S505. Compare the number of drawings that failed the audit with the preset number of drawings that failed the audit; S506. Generate and execute the instruction for random inspection of drawings that fail to pass inspection.

[0050] Specifically, the system automatically categorizes the reviewed drawings according to their ownership names. The system then retrieves the number of drawings that failed the review corresponding to each ownership name. Taking a failure number of 3 as an example, the system compares the number of failed drawings with the preset failure number of 2. If the number of failed drawings exceeds the preset failure number, drawings are randomly selected from the failed drawings and sent to the quality inspector for quality control, thereby improving the accuracy of the drawing review.

[0051] In one embodiment, refer to Figure 8 Based on the above-mentioned method for accurate feedback of construction drawing review results, a system for accurate feedback of construction drawing review results is provided, which includes the following modules: Drawing information acquisition module 1 is used to acquire input drawing information; Module 2 for obtaining examiner information; Drawing assignment module 3 is used to assign input drawings to reviewers; Same-name assignment module 4 is used to assign drawings with the same name to the corresponding examiners; Drawing Removal Module 5 is used to remove drawings with non-corresponding names from drawings that have not been processed by the examiner. Drawing quality inspection module 6 is used to randomly select drawings reviewed by the examiners for quality inspection; Drawing review module 7 is used to send unqualified drawings and annotations to the reviewer for review; In one embodiment, a smart terminal is provided, including a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, it causes the processor to perform the steps of the above-described method for accurately providing feedback on the results of construction drawing review. The steps of the method for accurately providing feedback on the results of construction drawing review can be any of the steps in the methods for accurately providing feedback on the results of construction drawing review described in the various embodiments above.

[0052] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided that stores a computer program capable of being loaded by a processor and executed as described above in the method for accurately feeding back the results of construction drawing review. The computer-readable storage medium includes, for example, various media capable of storing program code, such as a USB flash drive, a portable hard drive, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.

[0053] The above are all preferred embodiments of this application, and are not intended to limit the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, all equivalent changes made in accordance with the structure, shape and principle of this application should be covered within the scope of protection of this application.

Claims

1. A method for accurately providing feedback on the review results of construction drawings, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Obtain the input drawing information, which includes the name of the drawing, the drawing number, and the number of drawings. Obtain examiner information, including examiner ID and examiner working hours; Based on the examiner's identity information, retrieve the number of unexamined drawings corresponding to the examiner's ID; Retrieve the preset number of drawings reviewed corresponding to the reviewer ID from the preset database; Compare the number of unreviewed drawings with the number of pre-reviewed drawings; If the number of unreviewed drawings is less than the preset number of reviewed drawings, the difference between the preset number of reviewed drawings and the number of unreviewed drawings is obtained, and the difference is taken as the number of drawings that can be obtained. Based on the number of available drawings, generate and execute a drawing retrieval instruction. The drawing retrieval instruction is used by the examiner to retrieve the number of input drawings corresponding to the number of available drawings. Drawing retrieval commands include: Retrieve the unreviewed drawing information corresponding to the examiner ID. The unreviewed drawing information includes the name to which the unreviewed drawing belongs. Compare the attribution names of the unreviewed drawings with the attribution names of the input drawings. If the attribution names of the input drawings contain the same attribution name as the attribution name of the unreviewed drawings, the same attribution names are considered as belonging to the same category, and different attribution names are considered as belonging to different categories. Retrieve the input drawing number and the examiner ID corresponding to the same name; Based on the input drawing number and the examiner ID corresponding to the same name, generate and execute the corresponding allocation instruction. The corresponding allocation instruction is used to allocate the input drawing corresponding to the same name to the examiner corresponding to the same name. After generating and executing the corresponding allocation instructions, the following is included: Retrieve the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name; Compare the number of input drawings corresponding to the same category name with the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID; If the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID is less than the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name, the difference between the number of input drawings corresponding to the same name and the number of available drawings corresponding to the examiner ID is obtained, and the difference is used as the number of additional drawings. Based on the number of additional drawings, generate and execute drawing rejection instructions. Drawing rejection instructions are used to reject drawings with non-corresponding names that are the same number of examiner IDs as the number of additional drawings. Generate and execute a drawing assignment instruction with the same name. The drawing assignment instruction with the same name is used to assign drawings with the same name to the examiners corresponding to the same name.

2. The method for accurately feeding back construction drawing review results according to claim 1, characterized in that, After generating and executing a drawing retrieval command based on the number of available drawings, the following is included: Get the total number of drawings corresponding to the examiner ID. The total number of drawings is the number of drawings uploaded after the examiner has completed the review. Retrieve the number of pre-defined drawings corresponding to the examiner ID from the pre-defined database; Compare the total number of drawings with the preset number of drawings; If the total number of drawings is greater than the preset number of drawings, a random sampling instruction corresponding to the examiner ID is generated and executed. The random sampling instruction is used to randomly select drawings from the total number of drawings corresponding to the examiner ID. Obtain the drawings to be inspected, generate and execute the drawing to be inspected sending command. The drawing to be inspected sending command is used to send randomly selected drawings to the quality inspector.

3. The method for accurately feeding back the review results of construction drawings according to claim 2, characterized in that, After obtaining the drawings to be inspected, generating the drawings to be inspected, sending the instructions, and executing them, the process includes: Obtain the quality inspection results, which include those that pass and fail the quality inspection. If the quality inspection is qualified, a qualified prompt instruction is generated and executed. The qualified prompt instruction is used to notify the quality inspector that the quality has been qualified. If the quality inspection fails, a random re-inspection instruction corresponding to the examiner ID is generated and executed. The random re-inspection instruction is used to draw drawings again from the total number of drawings corresponding to the examiner ID. Obtain the drawings to be re-inspected, generate and execute the drawing re-inspection sending command, which is used to send the drawings to be re-inspected to the quality inspector; Based on the quality inspection failure, a failure notification instruction is generated and executed. The failure notification instruction is used to notify the quality inspector that the quality is not up to standard.

4. The method for accurately feeding back construction drawing review results according to claim 3, characterized in that, After generating and executing a non-conformance notification instruction based on a quality inspection failure, the following is included: Obtaining substandard drawings; Based on the non-conforming drawings, generate and execute a non-conforming drawing review instruction. The non-conforming drawing review instruction is used to prompt the examiner corresponding to the non-conforming drawings to review the non-conforming drawings. Obtain annotations for non-compliant drawings; Generate and execute annotation prompts. These prompts are used to inform the reviewer of the reasons why the drawings are not up to standard.

5. The method for accurately feeding back construction drawing review results according to claim 1, characterized in that, After generating and executing a drawing retrieval command based on the number of available drawings, the following is included: Obtain information on reviewed drawings, including the name of the reviewed drawings and the review results, which include whether the review was passed or not. Based on the ownership name of the approved drawings, generate and execute the drawing collection instruction. The drawing collection instruction is used to collect the approved drawings according to their ownership name. Get the number of drawings that failed the review corresponding to the ownership name of the reviewed drawings; Query the preset number of drawings that do not pass the preset database; Compare the number of drawings that failed the review with the preset number of drawings that failed; If the number of drawings that fail the review exceeds the preset number of drawings that fail the review, a drawing sampling inspection instruction will be generated and executed. The drawing sampling inspection instruction is used to randomly retrieve the drawings that fail the review and whose names correspond to the approved drawings, and send them to the quality inspector.

6. A precise feedback system for construction drawing review results, applied to the precise feedback method for construction drawing review results as described in any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that, include: The drawing information acquisition module (1) is used to acquire the input drawing information; The examiner information acquisition module (2) is used to acquire examiner information; The drawing assignment module (3) is used to assign the input drawings to the reviewers; The same-name allocation module (4) is used to allocate drawings with the same name to the corresponding examiners; The drawing rejection module (5) is used to reject drawings with non-corresponding names that have not been processed by the examiner; The drawing quality inspection module (6) is used to randomly select drawings reviewed by the examiners for quality inspection; The drawing review module (7) is used to send unqualified drawings and annotations to the reviewer for review.

7. A smart terminal, characterized in that, It includes a storage device and a processor, wherein the storage device stores a computer program that can be loaded by the processor and executed as described in any one of claims 1 to 5 for accurate feedback of construction drawing review results.

8. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer program is stored and can be loaded by a processor and executed as described in any one of claims 1 to 5, providing accurate feedback on the results of construction drawing review.

Images