Method, device and system for automatic checking of parameters of a tobacco production plant

Abstract

The present disclosure provides a method, device and system for automatically checking parameters of a tobacco production device, and relates to the field of automatic control. The method comprises: in response to a first operation node before tobacco production being triggered, checking parameters of a tobacco production device associated with the first operation node, or instructing a checking device to check the parameters of the tobacco production device associated with the first operation node to obtain a first checking result; and in the case that the first checking result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production device associated with the first operation node do not pass the check, showing a first parameter abnormality prompt information to a user. Through the above method, the checking efficiency of the parameters of the tobacco production device can be improved, and the checking reliability of the parameters of the tobacco production device can be improved, thereby helping to improve the production efficiency of tobacco and the quality of the produced tobacco.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This disclosure relates to the field of automatic control technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus and system for automatic parameter verification of tobacco production equipment. Background Technology

[0002] Tobacco processing is a crucial step in cigarette manufacturing. The accuracy of the parameters on the tobacco processing equipment directly impacts product quality. In actual production, if staff forget to revert to the original parameters after modification for maintenance or debugging, or if parameters are changed due to misoperation, the equipment may operate with incorrect parameters. Changes in critical equipment parameters can lead to serious process quality incidents. Therefore, ensuring the accuracy of equipment parameters before production is a vital aspect of the tobacco processing process.

[0003] Currently, to ensure the accuracy of equipment parameters, a combination of access control and manual verification is mainly used. Specifically, parameter modification permissions are set so that only a few people can modify the parameters, while manual verification before production ensures the accuracy of the equipment parameters. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This disclosure provides a method, apparatus, and system for automatic parameter verification of tobacco production equipment.

[0005] According to a first aspect of this disclosure, an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment is proposed, comprising: in response to a first operation node being triggered before tobacco production, verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node, or instructing a verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result, wherein the first operation node is a target operation node, the target operation node is an operation node bound to a parameter verification event, there are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the target operation node are a part of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment; if the first verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have failed verification, displaying a first parameter abnormality prompt message to the user.

[0006] In some embodiments, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the target operation node are determined based on the execution frequency of the target operation node and the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment, and / or based on the execution time of the target operation node and the update time of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0007] In some embodiments, the parameters of the target operation node and its associated tobacco production equipment satisfy the following: the execution frequency of at least a portion of the target operation node is positively correlated with the update frequency of the parameters of its associated tobacco production equipment; and / or the execution time of at least a portion of the target operation node is after the update time of the parameters of its associated tobacco production equipment.

[0008] In some embodiments, the instruction verification device verifies the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result, including: generating a verification instruction and sending the verification instruction to the verification device, the verification instruction being used to instruct the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node; and receiving the first verification result returned by the verification device.

[0009] In some embodiments, verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node includes: when the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a value verification type parameter, comparing the current setting value of the parameter with a standard value; when the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a range verification type parameter, comparing the current setting value of the parameter with a standard value range.

[0010] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment further includes: if the first verification result shows that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have passed the verification, triggering the next operation node according to the user's operation instruction or automatically.

[0011] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment further includes: confirming that the first operation node belongs to the target operation node before verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node, or before instructing the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node.

[0012] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment further includes: if the first verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have passed the verification, triggering a second operation node according to the user's operation instruction, wherein the second operation node is a target operation node and the execution frequency of the second operation node is higher than that of the first operation node; verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node, or instructing a verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node to obtain a second verification result, wherein the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node is higher than that of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node; if the second verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node have failed the verification, displaying a second parameter abnormality prompt message to the user.

[0013] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment further includes: updating the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node when the second verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node have passed the verification, and automatically triggering the third operation node after the update is completed, wherein the third operation node is a target operation node and the execution frequency of the third operation node is higher than the execution frequency of the first operation node; verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node, or instructing a verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node to obtain a third verification result, wherein the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node is higher than the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node; and displaying a third parameter abnormality prompt message to the user when the third verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node have failed the verification.

[0014] In some embodiments, the first operation node is the shift production start node, the second operation node is the batch task production node, and the third operation node is the batch task production success node.

[0015] According to a second aspect of this disclosure, a method for producing tobacco shreds is proposed, comprising: an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco shred production equipment as described above, for verifying the parameters of the tobacco shred production equipment; and producing tobacco shreds using the tobacco shred production equipment that has passed the parameter verification.

[0016] According to a third aspect of this disclosure, an automatic parameter verification device for tobacco production equipment is proposed, comprising: a verification module configured to, in response to the triggering of a first operation node before tobacco production, verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node, or instruct the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result, wherein the first operation node is a target operation node, the target operation node is an operation node bound to a parameter verification event, there are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the target operation node are a part of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment; and a display module configured to, if the first verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have failed verification, display a first parameter abnormality prompt message to the user.

[0017] According to a fourth aspect of this disclosure, an automatic parameter verification system is proposed, comprising: a centralized control system, including an automatic parameter verification device for tobacco production equipment as described above; and a verification device configured to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node according to an instruction from the centralized control system, and to send a first verification result to the centralized control system.

[0018] According to a fifth aspect of this disclosure, a tobacco production system is proposed, comprising: an automatic parameter verification system as described above; and tobacco production equipment configured to produce tobacco after the automatic parameter verification system has successfully verified the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0019] According to a sixth aspect of this disclosure, an electronic device is provided, comprising: a memory; and a processor coupled to the memory, the processor being configured to execute, based on instructions stored in the memory, the automatic parameter verification method for a tobacco production device as described above.

[0020] According to the seventh aspect of this disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium is provided that stores computer program instructions thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implement the automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment as described above.

[0021] Other features and advantages of this disclosure will become clear from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings. Attached Figure Description

[0022] The accompanying drawings, which form part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of this disclosure and, together with the specification, serve to explain the principles of this disclosure.

[0023] This disclosure can be more clearly understood with reference to the accompanying drawings and the following detailed description.

[0024] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0025] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment according to other embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0026] Figure 3 This is a flowchart illustrating an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0027] Figure 4 This is a schematic flowchart of a method for producing tobacco shreds according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0028] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an automatic parameter verification device for tobacco production equipment according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0029] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an automatic parameter verification system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0030] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a tobacco production system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0031] Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram of the equipment structure of a tobacco production line according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0032] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0033] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a computer system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. Detailed Implementation

[0034] Various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that, unless otherwise specifically stated, the relative arrangement, numerical expressions, and values ​​of the components and steps set forth in these embodiments do not limit the scope of the present disclosure.

[0035] At the same time, it should be understood that, for ease of description, the dimensions of the various parts shown in the accompanying drawings are not drawn according to actual scale.

[0036] The following description of at least one exemplary embodiment is merely illustrative and is in no way intended to limit this disclosure or its application or use.

[0037] Techniques, methods, and equipment known to those skilled in the art may not be discussed in detail, but where appropriate, such techniques, methods, and equipment should be considered part of the specification.

[0038] In all examples shown and discussed herein, any specific values ​​should be interpreted as merely exemplary and not as limitations. Therefore, other examples of exemplary embodiments may have different values.

[0039] It should be noted that similar labels and letters in the following figures indicate similar items; therefore, once an item is defined in one figure, it does not need to be discussed further in subsequent figures.

[0040] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this disclosure clearer, the following detailed description is provided in conjunction with specific embodiments and the accompanying drawings.

[0041] In related technologies, a combination of access control and manual verification can ensure parameter accuracy to a certain extent. However, because this method relies on manual operation, it is prone to omissions or errors in manual verification. For example, if maintenance personnel fail to promptly correct parameters after repairing the equipment, or if operators are perfunctory in verifying parameters and fail to promptly check for modifications, it may lead to incorrect parameters during production, thus affecting product quality. Furthermore, since the number of parameters in a yarn-making production line is large—some processes can have more than 150 parameters—requiring operators to verify these parameters would significantly increase their workload, slow down production efficiency in the yarn-making process, and increase the risk of oversights by operators, impacting product quality in the yarn-making stage.

[0042] In view of this, this disclosure proposes an automatic parameter verification method, device and system for tobacco production equipment, which can improve the verification efficiency and reliability of the parameters of tobacco production equipment, thereby helping to improve the quality of the produced tobacco while increasing the tobacco production efficiency.

[0043] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment according to some embodiments of this disclosure. Figure 1 As shown, the automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment includes steps S110 and S120.

[0044] In step S110, in response to the first operation node before tobacco production being triggered, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node are verified, or the verification device is instructed to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result.

[0045] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment is performed by the automatic parameter verification device of the tobacco production equipment.

[0046] Before tobacco production, there are multiple operation nodes, including the first operation node. The first operation node is a target operation node. Target operation nodes are those bound to parameter verification events. There are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are a subset of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0047] In some embodiments, all operational nodes prior to tobacco production are considered target operational nodes.

[0048] In some embodiments, some operation nodes before tobacco production are target operation nodes, while others are non-target operation nodes. Non-target operation nodes refer to operation nodes that are not bound to parameter validation events. For example, the operation nodes before tobacco production can be triggered by operators or automatically by the system.

[0049] For example, before tobacco production, there are three operational nodes, including the first operational node, and all three are target operational nodes, such as the shift production start node, the batch task issuance node, and the batch task issuance success node. The shift production start node can be understood as the check-in operation node triggered by the operator before tobacco production begins; the batch task issuance node can be understood as the operation node triggered by the operator before tobacco production begins, issuing a batch of tobacco production tasks; and the batch task issuance success node can be understood as the operation node where a batch of tobacco production tasks is successfully issued.

[0050] In practice, the operational nodes prior to tobacco production can include not only a three-node option, but also a two-node, four-node, or other number of operational nodes. Furthermore, the specific meaning and triggering method of each operational node can be determined based on the actual conditions of tobacco production.

[0051] In some embodiments, after the first operation node before tobacco production is triggered, the automatic parameter verification device of the tobacco production equipment verifies the parameters associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result.

[0052] For example, verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node includes: when the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a value-verification type parameter, comparing the current setting value of the parameter with the standard value; when the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a range-verification type parameter, comparing the current setting value of the parameter with the standard value range. By using different verification methods for value-verification type parameters and range-verification type parameters, more accurate verification can be performed, which helps to improve the accuracy and reliability of the verification results.

[0053] In other embodiments, after the first operation node before tobacco production is triggered, the automatic parameter verification device of the tobacco production equipment instructs the verification device to verify the parameters associated with the first operation node in order to obtain a first verification result.

[0054] In this embodiment, by associating multiple parameter verification events with multiple operation nodes, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment can be automatically verified when an operation node is triggered. Compared to manual parameter verification, this ensures parameter accuracy. Simultaneously, by associating only some parameters with operation nodes, each verification only checks a subset of parameters, minimizing system resource consumption and improving verification efficiency compared to verifying all parameters each time. Furthermore, by categorizing the parameters of the tobacco production equipment based on their characteristics and verifying different types of parameters at different operation nodes, this further ensures verification reliability while reducing unnecessary parameter verification cycles, thereby further minimizing system resource consumption.

[0055] In step S120, if the first verification result shows that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have failed the verification, the user is shown a first parameter abnormality prompt message.

[0056] In some embodiments, after the automatic parameter verification device of the tobacco production equipment obtains the first verification result, if the first verification result indicates that the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node has failed the verification, a first parameter abnormality prompt message is generated based on the first verification result and displayed to the user so that the user can promptly discover and modify the setting value of the abnormal parameter based on the abnormality prompt message. This helps to improve the processing efficiency of the tobacco production process while ensuring the accuracy of the setting value of the equipment parameter in tobacco production.

[0057] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the above steps can improve the efficiency and reliability of parameter verification of the tobacco production equipment, thereby helping to improve the quality of the produced tobacco while increasing the production efficiency.

[0058] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment according to other embodiments of this disclosure. Figure 2 As shown, the automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment includes steps S210 to S250.

[0059] In step S210, in response to the first operation node before tobacco production being triggered, a verification command is generated and sent to the verification device.

[0060] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment is executed by an automatic parameter verification device for the tobacco production equipment, or by a centralized control system including the automatic parameter verification device.

[0061] The first operation node is a target operation node. A target operation node is an operation node bound to a parameter validation event. There are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are a subset of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0062] In some embodiments, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are determined based on the execution frequency of the target operation node and the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0063] For example, the execution frequency of at least some of the target operation nodes is positively correlated with the update frequency of the parameters of the associated tobacco production equipment. For instance, target operation node 1 is the shift production start node, which is executed once a day, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment with a lower update frequency are associated with target operation node 1; target operation node 2 is the batch task production node, which is executed multiple times a day, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment with a higher update frequency are associated with target operation node 2.

[0064] In some embodiments, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are determined based on the execution time of the target operation node and the update time of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0065] For example, the execution time of at least a portion of the target operation node is after the update time of the parameters of its associated tobacco production equipment. For instance, target operation node 3 is a successful batch task submission node, which is executed after the process parameters (or formula parameters) of the tobacco production equipment are updated. Therefore, target operation node 3 is associated with the process parameters of the tobacco production equipment. Exemplarily, process parameters can be understood as parameters affecting the quality of tobacco in the tobacco processing process, including parameters such as the water addition ratio and feeding ratio of the loosening and rehydration machine and the feeding machine, the hot air temperature, the drum temperature of the drying machine, the negative pressure, and the hot air temperature.

[0066] In some embodiments, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are determined based on the execution frequency of the target operation node, the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment, the execution time of the target operation node, and the update time of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0067] For example, the execution frequency of at least a portion of the target operation node is positively correlated with the update frequency of the parameters of its associated tobacco production equipment, and the execution time of at least a portion of the target operation node is after the update time of the parameters of its associated tobacco production equipment.

[0068] In this embodiment, by associating multiple parameter verification events with multiple operation nodes, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment can be automatically verified when an operation node is triggered. Compared to manual parameter verification, this ensures parameter accuracy. Simultaneously, by associating only some parameters with operation nodes, each verification only checks a subset of parameters, minimizing system resource consumption and improving verification efficiency compared to verifying all parameters each time. Furthermore, by determining the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node based on the execution frequency of the target operation node, the update frequency of the tobacco production equipment parameters, the execution time of the target operation node, and the update time of the tobacco production equipment parameters, this allows for more frequent verification of parameters with high update frequencies and fewer verifications of parameters with low update frequencies. This ensures accurate equipment parameter settings while reducing unnecessary system resource consumption and improving verification efficiency. Moreover, timely parameter verification after updates further guarantees the accuracy of equipment parameter settings.

[0069] In some embodiments, before step S210, the method further includes: an automatic parameter verification device for the tobacco production equipment determining whether the first operation node is a target operation node; if the first operation node is confirmed to be a target operation node, steps S210 to S250 are executed; if the first operation node is confirmed not to be a target operation node, the parameter verification logic is not executed.

[0070] In some embodiments, after receiving a verification command, the verification device verifies the parameters associated with the first operation node in the following manner: when the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a value verification type parameter, the current setting value of the parameter is compared with the standard value. If the current setting value of the parameter is consistent with the standard value, the parameter is considered to have passed the verification; if the current setting value of the parameter is inconsistent with the standard value, the parameter is considered to have failed the verification. When the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a range verification type parameter, the current setting value of the parameter is compared with the standard value range. If the current setting value of the parameter is within the standard value range, the parameter is considered to have passed the verification; if the current setting value of the parameter is outside the standard value range, the parameter is considered to have failed the verification.

[0071] In this embodiment, parameter verification is performed by a separately configured verification device instructed by the centralized control system, rather than by the centralized control system itself. This ensures that parameter verification does not affect the original operation of the centralized control system, reducing the resource consumption of the centralized control system. Furthermore, by using different verification methods for parameters of different verification types, more accurate verification can be performed, which helps to improve the accuracy and reliability of the verification results.

[0072] In step S220, the first verification result returned by the verification device is received.

[0073] In step S230, it is determined whether the first verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification.

[0074] In some embodiments, the first verification result can be either an indication that the verification passed or an indication that the verification failed. For example, when the first verification result carries the identifier "success", it indicates that the associated parameter passed the verification; when the first verification result carries the identifier "false", it indicates that the associated parameter failed the verification. In addition, the first verification result may also carry indications of which specific parameters failed the verification and which parameters passed the verification.

[0075] If the first verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification, proceed to step S240; if the first verification result indicates that the associated parameter has failed the verification, proceed to step S250.

[0076] In step S240, the next operation node is triggered either according to the user's operation instructions or automatically.

[0077] In step S250, an error message indicating an abnormality in the first parameter is displayed to the user.

[0078] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification device of the tobacco production equipment generates a first parameter abnormality prompt message based on the first verification result and displays the first parameter abnormality prompt message to the user so that the user can promptly discover and modify the setting value of the abnormal parameter based on the abnormality prompt message. This helps to improve the processing efficiency of the tobacco production process while ensuring the accuracy of the setting value of the equipment parameters in tobacco production.

[0079] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the above steps can improve the efficiency and reliability of parameter verification of the tobacco production equipment, thereby helping to improve the quality of the produced tobacco while increasing the production efficiency.

[0080] Figure 3 This is a flowchart illustrating an automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. Figure 3 As shown, the automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment includes steps S301 to S315.

[0081] In step S301, in response to the first operation node before tobacco production being triggered, the verification device is instructed to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node in order to obtain the first verification result.

[0082] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment is executed by an automatic parameter verification device for the tobacco production equipment, or by a centralized control system including the automatic parameter verification device.

[0083] The first operation node is a target operation node. A target operation node is an operation node bound to a parameter validation event. There are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are a subset of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0084] In some embodiments, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are determined based on the execution frequency of the target operation node, the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment, the execution time of the target operation node, and the update time of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0085] For example, the execution frequency of at least a portion of the target operation nodes is positively correlated with the update frequency of the parameters of the associated tobacco production equipment, and the execution time of at least a portion of the target operation nodes is after the update time of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0086] For example, before tobacco production, there are multiple target operation nodes, including the first to third operation nodes, and one or more non-target operation nodes. For instance, the first operation node is the shift start node, executed once a day. Parameters of the tobacco production equipment with lower update frequencies are associated with the first operation node. For example, parameters of the tobacco production equipment with lower update frequencies include motor frequency and various equipment control parameters. For instance, the second operation node is the batch task production node, executed multiple times a day. Parameters of the tobacco production equipment with higher update frequencies are associated with the second operation node. For example, parameters of the tobacco production equipment with higher update frequencies include PID manual / automatic status and PID control parameters. For instance, the third operation node is the batch task production success node. This node is executed after the process parameters (or formula parameters) of the tobacco production equipment are updated. Therefore, the third operation node is associated with the process parameters of the tobacco production equipment. For example, process parameters include water ratio and feeding ratio of the loosening and rehydration machine and the feeding machine, hot air temperature, drum temperature of the drying machine, negative pressure, and hot air temperature.

[0087] In step S302, it is determined whether the first verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification.

[0088] If the first verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification, proceed directly to step S305; if the first verification result indicates that the associated parameter has failed the verification, proceed to steps S303 and S304, and then proceed to step S305.

[0089] In step S303, the user is shown an error message indicating an abnormality in the first parameter.

[0090] In step S304, the abnormal parameters are modified.

[0091] In this step, abnormal parameters in the parameters associated with the first operation node are modified according to the user's input instructions.

[0092] In some embodiments, prior to step S305, the method further includes: starting the tobacco production equipment according to the user's instructions.

[0093] In step S305, the second operation node is triggered according to the user's operation command.

[0094] The second operation node belongs to the target operation node.

[0095] After step S305, step S306 is executed.

[0096] In step S306, the calibration device is instructed to calibrate the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node to obtain a second calibration result.

[0097] For example, the second operation node is a batch task creation node. After the user triggers the batch task creation node, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with this operation node are verified to obtain a second verification result.

[0098] In step S307, it is determined whether the second verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification.

[0099] If the second verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification, proceed to step S310; if the second verification result indicates that the associated parameter has failed the verification, proceed to steps S308 and S309, and then proceed to step S310.

[0100] In step S308, an abnormality message for the second parameter is displayed to the user.

[0101] In step S309, the abnormal parameters are modified.

[0102] In this step, abnormal parameters in the parameters associated with the second operation node are modified according to the user's input instructions.

[0103] In step S310, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node are updated, and the third operation node is automatically triggered after the update is completed.

[0104] The third operation node belongs to the target operation node.

[0105] In some embodiments, the third operation node is the batch task creation success node. Further, in these embodiments, the centralized control system sends a parameter update instruction to the production system, and then the production system instructs the batch server to send batch task information to the programmable controller corresponding to the tobacco production equipment according to the parameter update instruction, thereby updating the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node. After the update is completed, the batch task creation success node is automatically triggered.

[0106] In step S311, the verification device is instructed to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node in order to obtain the third verification result.

[0107] In step S312, it is determined whether the third verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification.

[0108] If the third verification result indicates that the associated parameter has passed the verification, proceed to step S315; if the third verification result indicates that the associated parameter has failed the verification, proceed to steps S313 and S314, and then proceed to step S315.

[0109] In step S313, an abnormal prompt message for the third parameter is displayed to the user.

[0110] In step S314, the abnormal parameters are modified.

[0111] In this step, abnormal parameters in the parameters associated with the third operation node are modified according to the user's input instructions.

[0112] In step S315, the material transport equipment is instructed to transport the materials required for tobacco production.

[0113] For example, after a user triggers the operation node that allows material feeding, the automatic parameter verification device of the tobacco production equipment, or the centralized control system containing the automatic parameter verification device, sends a material transportation instruction to the material transportation equipment to instruct the material transportation equipment to transport the materials required for tobacco production.

[0114] In this embodiment, the above steps seamlessly integrate parameter verification into the operator's daily operations. Parameter verification is automatically executed upon triggering of operation nodes, eliminating the need for manual verification and ensuring accuracy and reliability without increasing operator workload. Furthermore, by automatically verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment in a time-sharing and categorized manner before tobacco production, the reliability of the equipment operation and the product's process quality are effectively guaranteed, effectively resolving various process quality issues caused by parameter errors. Moreover, the system resource consumption of tobacco production parameter verification is minimized.

[0115] Figure 4 This is a schematic flow diagram of a tobacco shred production method according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. Figure 4 As shown, the tobacco shred production method includes steps S410 and S420.

[0116] In step S410, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment are verified according to the automatic parameter verification method of the tobacco production equipment.

[0117] In some embodiments, according to Figures 1 to 3 The automatic parameter verification method for any of the tobacco shred production equipment described herein verifies the parameters of the tobacco shred production equipment.

[0118] In step S420, tobacco is produced using tobacco production equipment that has passed parameter verification.

[0119] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the above-described tobacco production method can improve tobacco production efficiency while ensuring the quality of the produced tobacco products.

[0120] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an automatic parameter calibration device for tobacco production equipment according to some embodiments of this disclosure. Figure 5As shown, the automatic parameter verification device 500 for tobacco production equipment includes a verification module 510 and a display module 520.

[0121] The verification module 510 is configured to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node in response to the first operation node being triggered, or to instruct the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node in order to obtain a first verification result.

[0122] The first operation node is a target operation node. A target operation node is an operation node bound to a parameter validation event. There are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with each target operation node are a subset of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0123] The display module 520 is configured to display a first parameter abnormality prompt message to the user if the first verification result shows that the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node has failed the verification.

[0124] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the above device can improve the efficiency and reliability of parameter verification of tobacco production equipment, thereby helping to improve the quality of tobacco produced while increasing tobacco production efficiency.

[0125] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an automatic parameter verification system according to some embodiments of this disclosure. For example... Figure 6 As shown, the automatic parameter verification system 600 includes a centralized control system 610 and a verification device 620.

[0126] The centralized control system 610 includes an automatic parameter verification device for the tobacco production equipment as described above, which is configured to send a verification command to the verification device in response to the triggering of a first operation node before tobacco production.

[0127] The verification device 610 is configured to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node after receiving the verification command from the centralized control system 610, and send the first verification result to the centralized control system 610.

[0128] The centralized control system 610 is also configured to display a first parameter abnormality prompt message to the user if the first verification result shows that the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node has failed the verification.

[0129] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the above-mentioned automatic parameter verification system can improve the verification efficiency and reliability of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment, thereby helping to improve the quality of the produced tobacco while increasing the tobacco production efficiency.

[0130] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a tobacco production system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. Figure 7 As shown, the tobacco production system 700 includes an automatic parameter verification system 710 and tobacco production equipment 720.

[0131] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification system 710 employs... Figure 6 The structure shown.

[0132] The tobacco production equipment 720 is configured to produce tobacco after the parameter automatic verification system 710 successfully verifies the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

[0133] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the above system can improve the production efficiency of tobacco shreds while ensuring the product quality of the produced tobacco shreds.

[0134] Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram of the equipment structure of a tobacco production line according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. Figure 8 As shown, the tobacco production line 800 includes a first production process equipment 810, a second production process equipment 820, a third production process equipment 830, a fourth production process equipment 840, a first programmable controller 850, a second programmable controller 860, a third programmable controller 870, a fourth programmable controller 880, and an automatic parameter verification system 890.

[0135] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the silk-making process is divided into four production stages, and corresponding production equipment is provided for each stage. Specifically, the equipment 810 for the first production stage includes a packing machine, a slicing machine, and a loosening and rehydration machine; the equipment 820 for the second production stage includes a leaf-moistening feeder; the equipment 830 for the third production stage includes a shredder and a shredder drying machine; and the equipment 840 for the fourth production stage includes a fragrancer and a boxing machine.

[0136] The first to fourth programmable controllers are used to control the equipment for the first to fourth production processes. Specifically, the first programmable controller 850 is used to control the equipment for the first production process 810, the second programmable controller 860 is used to control the equipment for the second production process 820, the third programmable controller 870 is used to control the equipment for the third production process 830, and the fourth programmable controller 880 is used to control the equipment for the fourth production process 840.

[0137] The parameter automatic verification system 890 is used to automatically verify the parameters of the equipment in the first to fourth production processes by interacting with the first to fourth programmable controllers.

[0138] In some embodiments, the automatic parameter verification system 890 performs parameter verification separately and individually for the equipment in the first to fourth production processes.

[0139] For example, corresponding operators are set up for the equipment in the first to fourth production processes. Before the production of tobacco, if an operator triggers a target operation node for the equipment in the first production process, the automatic parameter verification system 890 obtains the parameter to be verified in the equipment in the first production process from the first programmable controller and automatically executes the verification process for the parameter to be verified. If an operator triggers a target operation node for the equipment in the second production process, the automatic parameter verification system 890 obtains the parameter to be verified in the equipment in the second production process from the second programmable controller and automatically executes the verification process for the parameter to be verified.

[0140] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the above-mentioned tobacco production line can improve the production efficiency of tobacco while ensuring the product quality of the produced tobacco.

[0141] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0142] like Figure 9 As shown, the electronic device 900 includes a memory 910 and a processor 920 coupled to the memory 910. The memory 910 is used to store instructions for executing an embodiment of the automatic parameter verification method for a tobacco production device. The processor 920 is configured to execute the automatic parameter verification method for a tobacco production device in any of the embodiments of this disclosure based on the instructions stored in the memory 910.

[0143] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a computer system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0144] like Figure 10 As shown, the computer system 1000 can be represented in the form of a general computing device. The computer system 1000 includes a memory 1010, a processor 1020, and a bus 1030 connecting different system components.

[0145] The memory 1010 may include, for example, system memory, non-volatile storage media, etc. The system memory may store, for example, an operating system, application programs, a boot loader, and other programs. The system memory may include volatile storage media, such as random access memory (RAM) and / or cache memory. The non-volatile storage media may store, for example, instructions for a corresponding embodiment of an automatic parameter verification method for at least one tobacco production device being executed. Non-volatile storage media include, but are not limited to, disk storage, optical storage, flash memory, etc.

[0146] The processor 1020 can be implemented using a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gates or transistors, or other discrete hardware components. Correspondingly, each module, such as the verification module or the display module, can be implemented by executing instructions from the central processing unit (CPU) memory to perform the corresponding steps, or by using dedicated circuitry to execute the corresponding steps.

[0147] Bus 1030 can use any of the various bus architectures. For example, bus architectures include, but are not limited to, Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus.

[0148] The computer system 1000's interfaces 1040, 1050, and 1060, as well as the memory 1010 and processor 1020, can be connected via a bus 1030. Input / output interface 1040 provides a connection interface for input / output devices such as monitors, mice, and keyboards. Network interface 1050 provides a connection interface for various networked devices. Storage interface 1060 provides a connection interface for external storage devices such as floppy disks, USB flash drives, and SD cards.

[0149] Various aspects of this disclosure are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams of methods, apparatus, and computer program products according to embodiments of this disclosure. It should be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams, and combinations thereof, can be implemented by computer-readable program instructions.

[0150] These computer-readable program instructions are provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, or other programmable device to produce a machine, such that execution of the instructions by the processor produces means for implementing the functions specified in one or more boxes of the flowchart and / or block diagram.

[0151] These computer-readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. These instructions cause a computer to work in a particular manner to produce an article of manufacture, including instructions that implement the functions specified in one or more boxes in a flowchart and / or block diagram.

[0152] This disclosure may take the form of a completely hardware embodiment, a completely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects.

[0153] The automatic parameter verification method, device, and system for tobacco production equipment described in the above embodiments can improve both the verification efficiency and reliability of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment, thereby helping to improve the quality of the produced tobacco while increasing the production efficiency.

[0154] This concludes the detailed description of the automatic parameter calibration method, apparatus, and system for tobacco production equipment according to this disclosure. To avoid obscuring the concept of this disclosure, some details known in the art have not been described. Those skilled in the art can fully understand how to implement the technical solutions disclosed herein based on the above description.

Claims

1. An automatic parameter verification method for tobacco shred production equipment, comprising: In response to the triggering of a first operation node before tobacco production, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node are verified, or a verification device is instructed to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result. Here, the first operation node is a target operation node, and the target operation node is an operation node bound to a parameter verification event. There are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the target operation node are a part of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment. If the first verification result shows that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have failed the verification, the user will be shown a first parameter abnormality prompt message. If the first verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have passed the verification, a second operation node is triggered according to the user's operation command. The second operation node is a target operation node, and its execution frequency is higher than that of the first operation node. The parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node are verified, or a verification device is instructed to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node to obtain a second verification result. The update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node is higher than that of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node. If the second verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node have failed the verification, a second parameter abnormality prompt message is displayed to the user. If the second verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node pass the verification, the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node are updated, and the third operation node is automatically triggered after the update is completed. The third operation node is a target operation node, the execution frequency of the third operation node is higher than the execution frequency of the first operation node, and the execution time of the third operation node is after the process parameters of its associated tobacco production equipment are updated. The parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node are verified, or a verification device is instructed to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node to obtain a third verification result. The update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node is higher than the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node. If the third verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node fail the verification, a third parameter abnormality prompt message is displayed to the user.

2. The automatic parameter verification method for tobacco shred production equipment according to claim 1, wherein, The indicator verification device verifies the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result, including: Generate a verification command and send the verification command to the verification device. The verification command instructs the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node; and Receive the first verification result returned by the verification device.

3. The automatic parameter verification method for tobacco shred production equipment according to claim 1, wherein, Verification of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node includes: When the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a value verification type parameter, the current setting value of the parameter is compared with the standard value; When the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node is a range-verification type parameter, the current setting value of the parameter is compared with the standard value range.

4. The automatic parameter verification method for tobacco shred production equipment according to claim 1 further includes: If the first verification result shows that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have passed the verification, the next operation node will be triggered according to the user's operation instructions or automatically.

5. The automatic parameter verification method for tobacco shred production equipment according to claim 1 further includes: Before verifying the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node, or before instructing the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node, it is confirmed that the first operation node belongs to the target operation node.

6. The automatic parameter verification method for tobacco production equipment according to claim 1, wherein the first operation node is the shift production start node, the second operation node is the batch task production node, and the third operation node is the batch task production success node.

7. A method for producing tobacco shreds, comprising: The automatic parameter verification method for tobacco shred production equipment according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is used to verify the parameters of the tobacco shred production equipment. Tobacco is produced using tobacco production equipment that has passed the parameter verification.

8. An automatic parameter calibration device for tobacco shred production equipment, comprising: The verification module is configured to, in response to the triggering of a first operation node before tobacco production, verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node, or instruct the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node to obtain a first verification result. The first operation node is a target operation node, which is an operation node bound to a parameter verification event. There are multiple target operation nodes, and the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the target operation node are a part of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment. The display module is configured to display a first parameter abnormality prompt message to the user if the first verification result shows that the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node has failed the verification. The verification module is further configured to, when the first verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node have passed the verification, trigger a second operation node according to the user's operation instruction. The second operation node is a target operation node and its execution frequency is higher than that of the first operation node. The module verifies the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node, or instructs a verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node to obtain a second verification result. The update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node is higher than that of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node. The display module is also configured to display a second parameter abnormality prompt message to the user if the second verification result shows that the parameter of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node has failed the verification. The verification module is further configured to update the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node when the second verification result indicates that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node have passed the verification, and automatically trigger the third operation node after the update is completed. The third operation node is a target operation node, the execution frequency of the third operation node is higher than the execution frequency of the first operation node, and the execution time of the third operation node is after the update of the process parameters of its associated tobacco production equipment. The module verifies the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node, or instructs the verification device to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node to obtain a third verification result, wherein the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the third operation node is higher than the update frequency of the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node. The display module is also configured to display a third parameter abnormality prompt message to the user if the third verification result shows that the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the second operation node have failed the verification.

9. An automatic parameter verification system, comprising: The centralized control system includes the automatic parameter verification device for the tobacco production equipment as described in claim 8; The verification device is configured to verify the parameters of the tobacco production equipment associated with the first operation node according to the instructions of the centralized control system, and send the first verification result to the centralized control system.

10. A tobacco shred production system, comprising: The automatic parameter verification system as described in claim 9; The tobacco production equipment is configured to produce tobacco after the automatic parameter verification system has successfully verified the parameters of the tobacco production equipment.

11. An electronic device, comprising: Memory; as well as A processor coupled to the memory is configured to execute the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment according to any one of claims 1 to 6 based on instructions stored in the memory.

12. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon computer program instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the automatic parameter verification method for the tobacco production equipment according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images