Desulfurization load performance evaluation method, electronic device, and storage medium

CN117371644BActive Publication Date: 2026-09-18宁夏宝丰能源集团焦化二厂有限公司
View PDF 2 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202311184800.9
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Patents(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2023-09-14
Publication Date
2026-09-18
Estimated Expiration
2043-09-14

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

[0003]但是,这种脱硫负荷计算方法在生产过程中需要依靠运行数据进行判断,没有具体的测算方法和相关模型,存在发生超出焦炉煤气净化装置的处理负荷、净化后煤气中含量超标不符合质量要求的问题;且需要定期通过检验煤气中的含量计算焦炉煤气净化装置的脱硫负荷,检验数据滞后性较大,不能有效的指导炼焦配煤和焦炉煤气净化装置操作

Benefits of technology

[0014] Thirdly, embodiments of the present invention also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions for performing the desulfurization load performance evaluation method as described in the first aspect above.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN117371644B_ABST
    Figure CN117371644B_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

This invention relates to the field of desulfurization performance evaluation technology, specifically to a method, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating desulfurization load performance. The method is applied to a coke oven gas purification device and includes: obtaining the sulfur content of raw coal, sulfur carryover rate of gas, number of coke outlets per day, weight of coal cake per outlet, and raw gas production per ton of raw coal; calculating the hourly raw gas production based on the number of coke outlets per day, the weight of coal cake per outlet, and the raw gas production per ton of raw coal; determining the hydrogen sulfide content in the raw gas based on the sulfur content of raw coal and the sulfur carryover rate of gas; and determining the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device based on the hydrogen sulfide content and the hourly raw gas production. This invention, through this method, can accurately predict the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device and use this to formulate production control parameters for the coke oven gas purification device, thereby improving the pass rate of coke oven gas.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of desulfurization performance evaluation technology, and in particular to a desulfurization load performance evaluation method, electronic device, and storage medium. Background Technology

[0002] In related technologies, the desulfurization load of a coke oven gas purification device is calculated by measuring the amount of gas before the device and the H2S content in the gas after coking and coal blending. The desulfurization effect of the gas purification device is calculated by measuring the H2S content in the gas after the device.

[0003] However, this method of calculating desulfurization load relies on operational data during production and lacks specific calculation methods and related models. This leads to the possibility of exceeding the processing load of the coke oven gas purification unit, and issues with the purified gas's... The problem is that the content exceeds the standard and does not meet quality requirements; and it is necessary to regularly test the gas for its content. The content calculation of the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit has a large time lag in the test data, which cannot effectively guide the operation of coking coal blending and coke oven gas purification unit. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To address the aforementioned problems in the prior art, this invention provides a desulfurization load performance evaluation method, electronic equipment, and storage medium, which can accurately predict the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device and thereby formulate production control parameters for the coke oven gas purification device to improve the pass rate of coke oven gas.

[0005] In a first aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method for evaluating desulfurization load performance, applied to a coke oven gas purification device, the method comprising: To obtain the sulfur content of raw coal, sulfur carryover rate of coal gas, number of coke outlets per day, weight of coal cake per outlet, and coal gas production per ton of raw coal. The hourly raw coal gas production is calculated based on the number of coke outlets per day, the weight of coal cake per outlet, and the amount of raw coal gas produced per ton of raw coal. The amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas is determined based on the sulfur content of the raw coal and the sulfur carryover rate of the coal gas. The desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device is determined based on the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas and the hourly raw coal gas production.

[0006] According to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, obtaining the amount of coal gas produced per ton of raw coal waste includes: Obtain the density of raw coal gas, the volatile matter content of raw coal, and the coal type coefficient; The amount of raw coal gas produced per ton of raw coal is determined based on the density of the raw coal gas, the volatile matter content of the raw coal, and the coal type coefficient.

[0007] According to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, the formula for calculating the amount of coal gas produced per ton of raw coal is as follows: , in, This indicates the amount of gas produced per ton of raw coal. This represents the coal type coefficient. This refers to the volatile matter content of the single type of coal. This indicates the density of the raw coal gas. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend.

[0008] According to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, obtaining the sulfur carry-over rate of coal gas includes: To obtain the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking and the coking rate of the raw coal; The sulfur carry-over rate of the coal gas is determined based on the sulfur content of the raw coal, the sulfur content of the single type of coal after coking, and the coking rate of the raw coal of the single type of coal.

[0009] According to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, the sulfur content of the raw coal is obtained based on the sulfur content of a single type of coal and the proportion of the single type of coal added.

[0010] According to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, obtaining the number of coke holes per day includes: Obtain the total number of holes in the coke oven and the coke oven turnaround time; The number of coke outlets per day is determined based on the total number of coke oven holes and the coke oven turnover time.

[0011] According to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, the formula for calculating the number of coke holes per day is as follows: , Wherein, D represents the number of coke outlets per day. This indicates the total number of holes in the coke oven. This indicates the coke oven turnaround time.

[0012] According to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, the calculation formula for the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device is as follows: , in, This indicates the desulfurization load. This indicates the total number of holes in the coke oven. This indicates the weight of the single-hole coal cake. Indicates the coefficient for a single coal type. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend. Indicates the volatile matter content of a single type of coal. This indicates the coke oven turnaround time. Indicates the density of raw coal gas. Indicates the sulfur content of a single type of coal. This represents the ratio of the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking to the sulfur content of the single type of coal.

[0013] In a second aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide an electronic device, including: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement: the desulfurization load performance evaluation method as described in the first aspect above.

[0014] Thirdly, embodiments of the present invention also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions for performing the desulfurization load performance evaluation method as described in the first aspect above.

[0015] The beneficial effects of this invention are reflected in the following aspects: It obtains the sulfur content of raw coal, sulfur carryover rate of coal gas, number of coking holes per day, weight of coal cake per hole, and raw coal gas production per ton of raw coal. Based on the number of coking holes per day, weight of coal cake per hole, and raw coal gas production per ton of raw coal, it calculates the hourly raw coal gas production. Based on the sulfur content of raw coal and sulfur carryover rate of coal gas, it determines the hydrogen sulfide content of the raw coal gas. Based on the hydrogen sulfide content of the raw coal gas and the hourly raw coal gas production, it determines the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device. This application, through this method, can accurately predict the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device, and use this to formulate the production control parameters of the coke oven gas purification device, improving the qualification rate of coke oven gas. It has the purpose of pre-guiding production operations, maximizing the desulfurization load handling capacity of the coke oven gas purification device, improving the level of coking management technology and the quality of coke oven gas, and avoiding the need for manual detection of gas components. The content was used to calculate the lag of the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit. Attached Figure Description

[0016] Figure 1 This is a schematic flowchart of a desulfurization load performance evaluation method provided in the first aspect of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a schematic flowchart of another desulfurization load performance evaluation method provided in the first aspect embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of an electronic device provided in a second aspect embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0017] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0018] The following description, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, details a desulfurization load performance evaluation method, electronic device, and storage medium provided by the present invention through specific embodiments and application scenarios.

[0019] Example 1:

[0020] Reference Figure 1 , Figure 1 This illustration shows a desulfurization load performance evaluation method provided by a first aspect embodiment of the present invention, applied to a coke oven gas purification device. The method is also applied to and executed by an electronic device. In other words, the method can be executed by software or hardware installed on the electronic device, and the method includes the following steps: Step S110: Obtain the sulfur content of raw coal, sulfur carryover rate of coal gas, number of coke outlets per day, weight of coal cake per outlet, and coal gas production per ton of raw coal.

[0021] In this step, the sulfur content of raw coal refers to the mass fraction of sulfur in the raw coal, usually expressed as a percentage. The higher the sulfur content in the raw coal, the more sulfur dioxide gas will be produced during combustion, causing environmental pollution and health problems. The number of coke oven holes per day is obtained based on the total number of holes in the coke oven and the coke oven turnover time. Raw coal gas refers to coal gas that has not been purified.

[0022] Step S120: Calculate the hourly raw coal gas production based on the number of coke outlets per day, the weight of coal cake per outlet, and the amount of raw coal gas produced per ton of raw coal.

[0023] In this step, the formula for calculating the hourly output of raw coal gas is as follows: ,in, This indicates the amount of raw coal gas produced per hour. This indicates the number of coke holes produced per day. This indicates the weight of the coal cake per hole. This indicates the amount of gas produced per ton of raw coal.

[0024] Step S130: Determine the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas based on the sulfur content of the raw coal and the sulfur carrying rate of the coal gas.

[0025] In this step, the formula for calculating the hydrogen sulfide content in the raw coal gas is as follows: G Where G represents the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend. Indicates the sulfur content of a single type of coal. This indicates the sulfur carryover rate of coal gas.

[0026] It should be noted that the raw coal is obtained by blending various types of coal in a certain proportion.

[0027] Step S140: Determine the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit based on the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas and the hourly production of raw coal gas.

[0028] In this step, the calculation formula for the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit is as follows: ,in, Indicates desulfurization load, This indicates the hourly output of raw coal gas, where G represents the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas.

[0029] It should be noted that the unit of desulfurization load is... The unit for the hourly production of raw coal gas is h, the unit for hydrogen sulfide content in raw coal gas is .

[0030] In related technologies, the desulfurization load of a coke oven gas purification unit is calculated by measuring the amount of gas before the purification unit and the H2S content in the gas after coking coal blending. The desulfurization effect is then calculated by measuring the H2S content in the gas after the purification unit. However, this method of calculating the desulfurization load relies on operational data during production and lacks specific calculation methods and models. This leads to the possibility of exceeding the processing capacity of the coke oven gas purification unit and affecting the H2S content in the purified gas. The problem is that the content exceeds the standard and does not meet quality requirements; and it is necessary to regularly test the gas for its content. The content calculation of the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit has a large time lag in the test data, which cannot effectively guide the operation of coking coal blending and coke oven gas purification unit.

[0031] Therefore, the desulfurization load performance evaluation method provided in this embodiment of the invention obtains the sulfur content of raw coal, sulfur carryover rate of coal gas, number of coking holes per day, weight of coal cake per hole, and raw coal gas production per ton of raw coal. Based on the number of coking holes per day, weight of coal cake per hole, and raw coal gas production per ton of raw coal, the hourly raw coal gas production is calculated. Based on the sulfur content of raw coal and sulfur carryover rate of coal gas, the hydrogen sulfide content of raw coal gas is determined. Based on the hydrogen sulfide content of raw coal gas and the hourly raw coal gas production, the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device is determined. This application, through this method, can accurately predict the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device, and use this to formulate production control parameters for the coke oven gas purification device, improve the qualification rate of coke oven gas, and has the purpose of pre-guiding production operations. It maximizes the desulfurization load handling capacity of the coke oven gas purification device, improves the level of coking management technology and the quality of coke oven gas, and avoids the need for manual detection of gas components. The content was used to calculate the lag of the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit.

[0032] Example 2:

[0033] Reference Figure 2 , Figure 2 This invention illustrates another method for evaluating desulfurization load performance according to an embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, applied to a coke oven gas purification device. This method is also applied to and executed by an electronic device. In other words, the method can be executed by software or hardware installed in the electronic device, and includes the following steps: Step S211: Obtain the density of raw coal gas, the volatile matter content of raw coal, and the coal type coefficient.

[0034] In this step, the volatile matter content of the raw coal is obtained based on the volatile matter content of individual coal types and their proportions (volatile matter is dry ash-free volatile matter); the density of the raw coal gas ranges from 0.45 to 0.50. The value range of the coal type coefficient is 3 to 3.3.

[0035] Step S212: Determine the amount of raw coal gas produced per ton of raw coal based on the density of the raw coal gas, the volatile matter content of the raw coal, and the coal type coefficient.

[0036] In one possible implementation, the formula for calculating the amount of gas produced per ton of raw coal is as follows: , in, This indicates the amount of gas produced per ton of raw coal. Indicates the coal type coefficient. Indicates the volatile matter content of a single type of coal. Indicates the density of raw coal gas. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend.

[0037] Step S221: Obtain the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking and the coking rate of the raw coal.

[0038] In this step, the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking is calculated based on the sulfur content of the raw coal and the residual sulfur content of the raw coal.

[0039] Step S222: Determine the sulfur carry-over rate of coal gas based on the sulfur content of raw coal, the sulfur content of single coal after coking, and the coking rate of raw coal of single coal.

[0040] In one possible implementation, the sulfur content of the raw coal is the air-dried sulfur content of a single type of coal.

[0041] In this step, the formula for calculating the sulfur carryover rate of the coal gas is as follows: N Where N represents the sulfur carryover rate of the coal gas. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend. Indicates the volatile matter content of a single type of coal. This represents the ratio of the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking to the sulfur content of the single type of coal. This formula represents the overall coking rate of the raw coal.

[0042] Step S231: Obtain the total number of holes in the coke oven and the coke oven turnaround time.

[0043] Step S232: Determine the number of coke oven holes per day based on the total number of holes in the coke oven and the coke oven turnover time.

[0044] In steps S231 to S232, the formula for calculating the number of coke holes per day is as follows: , Where D represents the number of coke holes produced per day, This indicates the total number of holes in the coke oven. This indicates the coke oven turnover time.

[0045] Step S240: Obtain the sulfur content of the raw coal and the weight of the single-hole coal cake.

[0046] This step can be adopted. Figure 1 The description of step S110 in the embodiment will not be repeated here.

[0047] Step S250: Calculate the hourly raw coal gas production based on the number of coke outlets per day, the weight of coal cake per outlet, and the amount of raw coal gas produced per ton of raw coal.

[0048] This step can be adopted. Figure 1 The description of step S120 in the embodiment will not be repeated here.

[0049] Step S260: Determine the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas based on the sulfur content of the raw coal and the sulfur carrying rate of the coal gas.

[0050] This step can be adopted. Figure 1 The description of step S130 in the embodiment will not be repeated here.

[0051] Step S270: Determine the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit based on the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas and the hourly production of raw coal gas.

[0052] This step can be adopted. Figure 1 The description of step S140 in the embodiment will not be repeated here.

[0053] In one possible implementation method, the formula for calculating the desulfurization load is as follows: , in, Indicates desulfurization load, This indicates the total number of holes in the coke oven. This indicates the weight of the coal cake per hole. Indicates the coefficient for a single coal type. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend. Indicates the volatile matter content of a single type of coal. Indicates coke oven turnaround time. Indicates the density of raw coal gas. Indicates the sulfur content of a single type of coal. This represents the ratio of the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking to the sulfur content of the single type of coal itself. In related technologies, the desulfurization load of a coke oven gas purification unit is calculated by measuring the amount of gas before the purification unit and the H2S content in the gas after coking coal blending. The desulfurization effect is then calculated by measuring the H2S content in the gas after the purification unit. However, this method of calculating the desulfurization load relies on operational data during production and lacks specific calculation methods and models. This leads to the possibility of exceeding the processing capacity of the coke oven gas purification unit and affecting the H2S content in the purified gas. The problem is that the content exceeds the standard and does not meet quality requirements; and it is necessary to regularly test the gas for its content. The content calculation of the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit has a large time lag in the test data, which cannot effectively guide the operation of coking coal blending and coke oven gas purification unit.

[0054] The desulfurization load performance evaluation method provided in this invention obtains the raw coal gas density, raw coal volatile matter, and coal type coefficient. Based on these parameters, it determines the raw coal gas production per ton of raw coal. It also obtains the sulfur content and coking rate of a single type of coal after coking. Based on the sulfur content, coking rate, and coking rate of the raw coal, it determines the gas flow carrying capacity. Furthermore, it obtains the total number of coke oven holes and the coke oven turnover time. Based on this, it determines the number of coke oven holes per day. Finally, it obtains the sulfur content and weight of a single-hole coal cake. Based on the number of coke oven holes per day, the weight of a single-hole coal cake, and the raw coal gas production per ton of raw coal, it calculates the hourly raw coal gas production. Based on the sulfur content and sulfur carrying capacity of the raw coal, it determines the hydrogen sulfide content in the raw coal gas. Finally, based on the hydrogen sulfide content and hourly raw coal gas production, it determines the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device. This application utilizes a method to accurately predict the desulfurization load of a coke oven gas purification unit, thereby determining the production control parameters for the unit, improving the pass rate of coke oven gas, and providing advance guidance for production operations. This maximizes the desulfurization load handling capacity of the coke oven gas purification unit, enhances coking management technology, and improves the quality of coke oven gas, while avoiding the need for manual detection of gas components. The content was used to calculate the lag of the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit.

[0055] An exemplary embodiment of the desulfurization load performance evaluation method applied to calculate the desulfurization load of a coke oven gas purification unit: A coke oven gas purification unit in a coking plant has a designed gas processing capacity of 155,000 m³ / h, a designed hydrogen sulfide content before the purification unit of 10 g / m³, and a designed hydrogen sulfide content after the purification unit of ≤0.25 g / m³. The desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit designed for this coking plant is calculated using the desulfurization load performance evaluation method of this application as follows: 1 ) That is, the maximum design load of the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit in the coking plant is 1.55 t / h.

[0056] The table below shows the desulfurization load calculation model established using the desulfurization load performance evaluation method:

[0057] Using the desulfurization load performance evaluation method, one production line of this coking plant produces coke 1, and another produces coke 2. The calculated hourly raw coal gas production is 153,046 m³. 3 The hydrogen sulfide concentration in the raw coal gas was 10661 mg / m³. 3The desulfurization load is 1.63 t / h (>1.55 t / h), which exceeds the desulfurization load capacity of the coke oven gas purification unit. The H2S content of the purified gas is at risk of exceeding the standard (≥0.25 g / m3), which cannot meet the downstream methanol coke oven gas to methanol production conditions. The unqualified coke oven gas is released through flare ignition, resulting in gas loss.

[0058] Based on this, the quality of coal fed into the furnace or the type of coke can be adjusted using the desulfurization load prediction model in the table below to meet the desulfurization load capacity of the downstream coke oven gas purification unit:

[0059] By adjusting the quality of the coal or the type of coke fed into the coking plant, the following can be achieved: Under the condition that the original coke type remains unchanged, by adjusting the quality of raw coal, the hourly raw coal gas production is calculated to be 153,046 m³. 3 The hydrogen sulfide content in the raw coal gas is 9904 mg / m³. 3 The desulfurization load is 1.52 t / h (<1.55 t / h), which meets the desulfurization load capacity of the downstream gas purification unit.

[0060] By adjusting the coke type on one production line to produce coke 1 and coke 3, the calculated hourly raw coal gas production is 151715 m³. 3 The hydrogen sulfide content in the raw coal gas is 10102 mg / m³. 3 The desulfurization load is 1.53 t / h (<1.55 t / h), which meets the desulfurization load capacity of the downstream gas purification unit.

[0061] Using the above calculation method, the quality of raw coal or coke type can be adjusted to meet the desulfurization load capacity of the downstream coke oven gas purification unit, so that the purified gas meets the quality requirements.

[0062] Optionally, such as Figure 3 As shown, a second aspect embodiment of the present invention also provides an electronic device 700, including a processor 710 and a memory 720. The memory 720 stores a program or instructions that can be executed on the processor 710. When the program or instructions are executed by the processor 710, they implement the various processes of the first aspect desulfurization load performance evaluation method embodiment described above, and can achieve the same technical effect. To avoid repetition, they will not be described again here.

[0063] It should be noted that the electronic devices in the embodiments of the present invention include: servers, terminals, or other devices besides terminals.

[0064] The above electronic device structure does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device. An electronic device may include more or fewer components than illustrated, or combine certain components, or arrange them differently. For example, an input unit may include a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) and a microphone, and a display unit may use a liquid crystal display (LCD), organic light-emitting diode (OLED), or other similar display panels. User input units include at least one of a touch panel and other input devices. A touch panel is also called a touchscreen. Other input devices may include, but are not limited to, physical keyboards, function keys (such as volume control buttons, power buttons, etc.), trackballs, mice, and joysticks, which will not be elaborated further here.

[0065] Memory can be used to store software programs and various data. Memory can primarily include a first storage area for storing programs or instructions and a second storage area for storing data. The first storage area can store the operating system, application programs or instructions required for at least one function (such as sound playback, image playback, etc.). Furthermore, memory can include volatile memory or non-volatile memory, or both. Non-volatile memory can be read-only memory (ROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can be random access memory (RAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), double data rate synchronous dynamic random access memory (DDRSDRAM), enhanced synchronous dynamic random access memory (ESDRAM), synchronous linked dynamic random access memory (Synchlink DRAM, SLDRAM), and direct memory bus RAM (DRRAM).

[0066] The processor may include one or more processing units; optionally, the processor integrates an application processor and a modem processor, wherein the application processor mainly handles operations related to the operating system, user interface, and applications, while the modem processor mainly handles wireless communication signals, such as a baseband processor. It is understood that the aforementioned modem processor may also not be integrated into the processor.

[0067] This invention also provides a readable storage medium storing a program or instructions. When the program or instructions are executed by a processor, they implement the various processes of the above-described first aspect of the desulfurization load performance evaluation method embodiment and achieve the same technical effect. To avoid repetition, they will not be described again here.

[0068] The processor is the processor in the electronic device described in the above embodiments. The readable storage medium includes computer-readable storage media such as ROM, RAM, magnetic disk, or optical disk. It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that includes that element. Furthermore, it should be noted that the scope of the methods and apparatus in the embodiments of the present invention is not limited to performing functions in the order shown or discussed, but may also include performing functions substantially simultaneously or in the reverse order, for example, the described methods may be performed in an order different from that described. Additionally, features described with reference to certain examples may be combined in other examples.

[0069] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that the methods of the above embodiments can be implemented by means of software plus necessary general-purpose hardware platforms. Of course, they can also be implemented by hardware, but in many cases the former is a better implementation method. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, or the part that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a computer software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium (such as ROM / RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) and includes several instructions to cause a terminal (which may be a mobile phone, computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute the methods of the various embodiments of the present invention.

[0070] In the description of embodiments of the present invention, the terms "first," "second," "third," and "fourth" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined as "first," "second," "third," or "fourth" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of the present invention, unless otherwise stated, "a plurality of" means two or more.

[0071] In the description of embodiments of the present invention, specific features, structures, materials or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples.

[0072] Although embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating desulfurization load performance, applied to a coke oven gas purification device, characterized in that, include: To obtain the sulfur content of raw coal, sulfur carryover rate of coal gas, number of coke outlets per day, weight of coal cake per outlet, and coal gas production per ton of raw coal. The process of obtaining the sulfur carryover rate of coal gas includes: To obtain the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking and the coking rate of the raw coal; The sulfur carry-over rate of the coal gas is determined based on the sulfur content of the raw coal, the sulfur content of the single type of coal after coking, and the coking rate of the raw coal of the single type of coal. The hourly raw coal gas production is calculated based on the number of coke outlets per day, the weight of coal cake per outlet, and the amount of raw coal gas produced per ton of raw coal. The amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas is determined based on the sulfur content of the raw coal and the sulfur carryover rate of the coal gas. The desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification device is determined based on the amount of hydrogen sulfide in the raw coal gas and the hourly raw coal gas production. The method of obtaining the amount of coal gas produced per ton of raw coal includes: Obtain the density of raw coal gas, the volatile matter content of raw coal, and the coal type coefficient; The amount of raw coal gas produced per ton of raw coal is determined based on the density of the raw coal gas, the volatile matter content of the raw coal, and the coal type coefficient. The formula for calculating the amount of gas produced per ton of raw coal is as follows: , in, This indicates the amount of gas produced per ton of raw coal. This represents the coal type coefficient. This refers to the volatile matter content of the single type of coal. This indicates the density of the raw coal gas. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend; The process of obtaining the number of coke holes per day includes: Obtain the total number of holes in the coke oven and the coke oven turnaround time; The number of coke oven holes per day is determined based on the total number of holes in the coke oven and the coke oven turnover time. The formula for calculating the number of coke outlets per day is as follows: , Wherein, D represents the number of coke holes per day. This indicates the total number of holes in the coke oven. This indicates the coke oven turnaround time; The calculation formula for the desulfurization load of the coke oven gas purification unit is as follows: , in, This indicates the desulfurization load. This indicates the total number of holes in the coke oven. This indicates the weight of the single-hole coal cake. Indicates the coefficient for a single coal type. This indicates the proportion of a single type of coal in the blend. Indicates the volatile matter content of a single type of coal. This indicates the coke oven turnaround time. Indicates the density of raw coal gas. Indicates the sulfur content of a single type of coal. This represents the ratio of the sulfur content of a single type of coal after coking to the sulfur content of the single type of coal.

2. The desulfurization load performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The sulfur content of the raw coal is obtained based on the sulfur content of a single type of coal and the proportion of each type of coal in the blend.

3. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: A memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the desulfurization load performance evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 2.

4. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores computer-executable instructions for: the desulfurization load performance evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 2.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Method for establishing coking coal cost-effectiveness evaluation model

    CN110275007A

  • Desulfurization performance monitoring device and desulfurization performance monitoring method

    JP2022155049A