Method, apparatus, and medium for girder reinforcement

Abstract

This application discloses a method, equipment, and medium for secondary beam reinforcement, belonging to the technical field of secondary beam reinforcement. In complex design scenarios, relying on manual experience for design may lead to the neglect of secondary beam reinforcement when the diagonal bracing arrangement at the dummy beam is not feasible. In this application, the secondary beam reinforcement method is determined at the initial design stage, avoiding structural insecurity caused by relying on experience on-site. While ensuring structural safety, the final fixing method is determined through economic cost comparison, reducing the support cost for secondary beam reinforcement while meeting the requirements of maximum layout capacity and structural safety.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the technical field of secondary beam reinforcement, and in particular to a secondary beam reinforcement method, secondary beam reinforcement equipment, and computer-readable storage medium. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, photovoltaic power plant design often relies on manual experience. However, in reality, manual design often results in practices such as omitting secondary beam reinforcements or deducting components above the support structure, leading to unsafe power plant structures or failure to meet maximum installed capacity requirements.

[0003] Therefore, there is an urgent need for a reinforcement method for the cantilevered secondary beams of photovoltaic power plants that can be automated and optimized in complex scenarios. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The main objective of this application is to provide a method, equipment, and computer-readable storage medium for reinforcing secondary beams.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, this application provides a method for strengthening secondary beams, the method comprising:

[0006] Obtain the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the maximum capacity when arranging photovoltaic modules, and determine the secondary beam whose cantilever length is greater than a preset length threshold as the target secondary beam to be reinforced, wherein the length of the secondary beam cantilever is the distance between the endpoint of the secondary beam and the nearest adjacent target main beam;

[0007] Determine the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam;

[0008] The optimal reinforcement scheme is adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0009] For example, the step of determining the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam includes:

[0010] When the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing are met, the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing is determined, and the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with secondary beam welding is determined.

[0011] The reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost between the first cost and the second cost is determined as the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0012] For example, before the step of satisfying the reinforcement condition of adding a false beam bracing to the target main beam, the method includes:

[0013] Determine the undetermined dummy beam for which the target secondary beam will be reinforced by diagonal bracing on the target main beam;

[0014] Obtain the height of the columns supporting the target main beam, and the number of columns on the target main beam corresponding to the length range of the undetermined dummy beam;

[0015] Based on the column height and the number of columns, determine whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing are met.

[0016] For example, the step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing, based on the column height and the number of columns, includes:

[0017] Determine whether the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height required for dummy beam bracing reinforcement of the target secondary beam;

[0018] If the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height, then determine whether the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns supporting the false beam when the target secondary beam is reinforced with false beam diagonal bracing;

[0019] If the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, then the current undetermined dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement condition of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0020] If the number of columns is less than the minimum number of columns, then when the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, the extended dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0021] For example, the step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing based on the column height and the number of columns further includes:

[0022] If the height of the column is less than the minimum column height, or if the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is less than the minimum number of columns, then a reinforcement scheme of secondary beam welding reinforcement is adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0023] For example, the step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing includes:

[0024] Based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column supporting the target main beam, the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are output through a preset optimization algorithm.

[0025] The optimization objective of the preset optimization algorithm is to minimize the total cost of steel usage and welding of the dummy beam and diagonal brace. The steel usage cost is determined by the length of the diagonal brace and the length of the dummy beam, and the welding cost is determined by the number of welding points at both ends of the diagonal brace and at the intersection of the dummy beam and the secondary beam.

[0026] Based on the location of the target dummy beam and the installation location of the diagonal brace, determine the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0027] For example, the step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing based on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes:

[0028] Determine the first distance between the target dummy beam and the target main beam, and determine the second distance between the installation position of the diagonal brace and the top of the column. Determine the length of the target diagonal brace based on the first distance and the second distance.

[0029] The target steel consumption cost is determined based on the target brace length and the target dummy beam length; the target welding cost is determined based on the number of welding points at both ends of the target brace and at the intersection of the target dummy beam and the target secondary beam.

[0030] The first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing is determined to be the cost of the target steel usage and the target welding cost.

[0031] For example, after the step of outputting the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal bracing on the column to support the target dummy beam based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column using a preset optimization algorithm, the process includes:

[0032] The position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace are subjected to stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification to determine whether the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0033] If the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace do not meet the safety verification conditions, then based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column, a new position of the target dummy beam and a new installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are re-output through a preset optimization algorithm until the new position of the target dummy beam and the new installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0034] For example, the step of performing stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes:

[0035] By using a preset mechanical calculation model, determine whether the stress ratio corresponding to the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace is less than 1; and / or,

[0036] Determine the position of the target dummy beam and the diagonal brace corresponding to the installation position of the diagonal brace, and whether there is any interference between them and the obstacle.

[0037] For example, the step of determining the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam includes:

[0038] By using a pre-set mechanical calculation model, the length, width, and height of the target secondary beam for secondary beam reinforcement by welding are determined.

[0039] Based on the length, width, and height of the weld, determine the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam.

[0040] This application also provides a secondary beam reinforcement device, the device comprising:

[0041] The acquisition module is used to acquire the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the maximum capacity when the photovoltaic modules are arranged, and to determine the secondary beam whose cantilever length is greater than a preset length threshold as the target secondary beam to be reinforced, wherein the cantilever length of the secondary beam is the distance between the endpoint of the secondary beam and the nearest adjacent target main beam;

[0042] The determination module is used to determine the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam;

[0043] A module is used to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam using the optimal reinforcement scheme.

[0044] This application also provides a secondary beam reinforcement device, which includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the secondary beam reinforcement method as described above.

[0045] This application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the secondary beam reinforcement method described above.

[0046] This application proposes a secondary beam reinforcement method, secondary beam reinforcement equipment, and computer-readable storage medium. The method involves obtaining the cantilever length of the secondary beam corresponding to the maximum capacity when photovoltaic modules are arranged, determining secondary beams with cantilever lengths greater than a preset length threshold as target secondary beams to be reinforced, wherein the cantilever length is the distance between the endpoint of the secondary beam and the nearest adjacent target main beam; determining an optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam; and using the optimal reinforcement scheme to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0047] In complex design scenarios, relying on manual experience for design may result in the neglect of secondary beam reinforcement when the diagonal bracing arrangement at the dummy beam is not met. In this application, however, when the cantilever length of the secondary beam corresponding to the maximum capacity during photovoltaic module arrangement exceeds a preset length threshold, the target secondary beam with a cantilever length exceeding the preset threshold is reinforced. Specifically, an optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam is determined, and this optimal reinforcement scheme is used to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam. Furthermore, when the reinforcement condition for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing is met, a first cost for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing and a second cost for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with secondary beam welding are determined. Then, the reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost of the first and second costs is used to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0048] Therefore, by determining the secondary beam reinforcement method in the initial design stage, structural insecurity caused by relying on experience on site can be avoided. While ensuring structural safety, the final fixing method can be determined by comparing economic costs, which can reduce the support cost of secondary beam reinforcement while meeting the requirements of maximum layout capacity and structural safety. Attached Figure Description

[0049] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the operating device of the hardware operating environment involved in the embodiments of this application;

[0050] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method described in this application.

[0051] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the component arrangement of an embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method involved in the present application;

[0052] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of a dummy beam from one embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method involved in the present application.

[0053] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the diagonal bracing of one embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method involved in the present application;

[0054] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the welding process in one embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method described in this application.

[0055] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of an extended dummy beam from one embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method involved in the present application.

[0056] Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram of obstacle interference in one embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method involved in the present application.

[0057] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method described in this application.

[0058] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of the secondary beam reinforcement device involved in the embodiments of this application.

[0059] The realization of the purpose, functional features and advantages of this application will be further explained in conjunction with the embodiments and with reference to the accompanying drawings. Detailed Implementation

[0060] It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of this application and are not intended to limit this application.

[0061] Reference Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the operating device structure of the hardware operating environment involved in the embodiments of this application.

[0062] like Figure 1As shown, the operating device may include: a processor 1001, such as a central processing unit (CPU), a communication bus 1002, a user interface 1003, a network interface 1004, and a memory 1005. The communication bus 1002 is used to enable communication between these components. The user interface 1003 may include a display screen or an input unit such as a keyboard; optionally, the user interface 1003 may also include a standard wired interface or a wireless interface. The network interface 1004 may optionally include a standard wired interface or a wireless interface (such as a Wi-Fi interface). The memory 1005 may be a high-speed random access memory (RAM) or a stable non-volatile memory (NVM), such as a disk drive. The memory 1005 may also optionally be a storage device independent of the aforementioned processor 1001.

[0063] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 1 The structure shown does not constitute a limitation on the operating equipment and may include more or fewer components than shown, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0064] like Figure 1 As shown, the memory 1005, which serves as a storage medium, may include an operating system, a data storage module, a network communication module, a user interface module, and computer programs.

[0065] exist Figure 1 In the illustrated operating device, the network interface 1004 is mainly used for data communication with other devices; the user interface 1003 is mainly used for data interaction with the user; the processor 1001 and memory 1005 in the operating device of this application can be disposed in the operating device, and the operating device calls the computer program stored in the memory 1005 through the processor 1001 and performs the following operations:

[0066] Obtain the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the maximum capacity when arranging photovoltaic modules, and determine the secondary beam whose cantilever length is greater than a preset length threshold as the target secondary beam to be reinforced, wherein the length of the secondary beam cantilever is the distance between the endpoint of the secondary beam and the nearest adjacent target main beam;

[0067] Determine the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam;

[0068] The optimal reinforcement scheme is adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0069] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0070] The step of determining the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam includes:

[0071] When the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing are met, the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing is determined, and the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with secondary beam welding is determined.

[0072] The reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost between the first cost and the second cost is determined as the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0073] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0074] Before the step of satisfying the reinforcement condition of applying a false beam bracing to the target main beam, the following steps are included:

[0075] Determine the undetermined dummy beam for which the target secondary beam will be reinforced by diagonal bracing on the target main beam;

[0076] Obtain the height of the columns supporting the target main beam, and the number of columns on the target main beam corresponding to the length range of the undetermined dummy beam;

[0077] Based on the column height and the number of columns, determine whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing are met.

[0078] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0079] The step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for applying dummy beam bracing to the target main beam based on the column height and the number of columns are met includes:

[0080] Determine whether the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height required for dummy beam bracing reinforcement of the target secondary beam;

[0081] If the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height, then determine whether the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns supporting the false beam when the target secondary beam is reinforced with false beam diagonal bracing;

[0082] If the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, then the current undetermined dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement condition of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0083] If the number of columns is less than the minimum number of columns, then when the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, the extended dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0084] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0085] The step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing, based on the column height and the number of columns, further includes:

[0086] If the height of the column is less than the minimum column height, or if the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is less than the minimum number of columns, then a reinforcement scheme of secondary beam welding reinforcement is adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0087] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0088] The step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing includes:

[0089] Based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column supporting the target main beam, the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are output through a preset optimization algorithm.

[0090] The optimization objective of the preset optimization algorithm is to minimize the total cost of steel usage and welding of the dummy beam and diagonal brace. The steel usage cost is determined by the length of the diagonal brace and the length of the dummy beam, and the welding cost is determined by the number of welding points at both ends of the diagonal brace and at the intersection of the dummy beam and the secondary beam.

[0091] Based on the location of the target dummy beam and the installation location of the diagonal brace, determine the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0092] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0093] The step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing based on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes:

[0094] Determine the first distance between the target dummy beam and the target main beam, and determine the second distance between the installation position of the diagonal brace and the top of the column. Determine the length of the target diagonal brace based on the first distance and the second distance.

[0095] The target steel consumption cost is determined based on the target brace length and the target dummy beam length; the target welding cost is determined based on the number of welding points at both ends of the target brace and at the intersection of the target dummy beam and the target secondary beam.

[0096] The first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing is determined to be the cost of the target steel usage and the target welding cost.

[0097] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0098] After the step of outputting the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal bracing on the column to support the target dummy beam based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column using a preset optimization algorithm, the following steps are included:

[0099] The position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace are subjected to stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification to determine whether the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0100] If the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace do not meet the safety verification conditions, then based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column, a new position of the target dummy beam and a new installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are re-output through a preset optimization algorithm until the new position of the target dummy beam and the new installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0101] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0102] The step of performing stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes:

[0103] By using a preset mechanical calculation model, determine whether the stress ratio corresponding to the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace is less than 1; and / or,

[0104] Determine the position of the target dummy beam and the diagonal brace corresponding to the installation position of the diagonal brace, and whether there is any interference between them and the obstacle.

[0105] In one embodiment, the processor 1001 may invoke a computer program stored in the memory 1005 and further perform the following operations:

[0106] The step of determining the second cost of welding the target secondary beam to the target main beam includes:

[0107] By using a pre-set mechanical calculation model, the length, width, and height of the target secondary beam for secondary beam reinforcement by welding are determined.

[0108] Based on the length, width, and height of the weld, determine the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam.

[0109] This application provides a method for strengthening secondary beams, referring to... Figure 2 In one embodiment of the secondary beam reinforcement method, the method includes:

[0110] Step S10: Obtain the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the maximum capacity when arranging photovoltaic modules, and determine the secondary beam whose cantilever length is greater than a preset length threshold as the target secondary beam to be reinforced, wherein the cantilever length of the secondary beam is the distance between the endpoint of the secondary beam and the nearest adjacent target main beam.

[0111] Step S20: Determine the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam;

[0112] Step S30: Using the optimal reinforcement scheme, the target secondary beam is reinforced onto the target main beam.

[0113] In one embodiment, basic information for photovoltaic power station design is obtained. In a typical application scenario, this includes roof information, component layout information, and column base location information for a residential sunroom. The component layout can be obtained based on the maximum capacity of the power station. Using standard drawing sets, power station and support drawings are generated based on the maximum component capacity. It is then determined whether the cantilever of each secondary beam exceeds a set threshold to identify the reinforcement area for the secondary beams.

[0114] In one embodiment, reference is made to Figure 3 The dots represent column base points used to support the main beam. Secondary beams are mounted on the main beam and perpendicular to it. In one embodiment, refer to... Figure 4 The method obtains the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the maximum capacity when arranging photovoltaic modules. Taking the left and right side cantilever as an example, it determines whether the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the left and right side modules exceeds the preset length threshold in the module arrangement result. When the length of the secondary beam cantilever exceeds the preset length threshold, it is defined that the secondary beam under the module needs to be reinforced.

[0115] Then, the optimal reinforcement scheme of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam is adopted, and the target secondary beam is reinforced onto the target main beam.

[0116] For example, the step of determining the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam includes:

[0117] When the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing are met, the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing is determined, and the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with secondary beam welding is determined.

[0118] The reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost between the first cost and the second cost is determined as the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0119] There are two reinforcement methods: one is to add false beams and diagonal braces, and the other is to weld reinforcement under the secondary beam, such as... Figure 5 , Figure 6 As shown, when the reinforcement condition of simulant beam bracing to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam is met, the first cost of simulant beam bracing to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam is determined, and the second cost of welding reinforcement to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam is determined. By adopting the reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost of the first and second costs, the target secondary beam is reinforced onto the target main beam in a low-cost manner, achieving low-cost reinforcement of the secondary beam.

[0120] In complex design scenarios, relying on manual experience for design may result in the neglect of secondary beam reinforcement when the diagonal bracing arrangement at the dummy beam is not met. In this embodiment, however, when the cantilever length of the secondary beam corresponding to the maximum capacity during photovoltaic module arrangement exceeds a preset length threshold, the target secondary beam with a cantilever length exceeding the preset threshold is reinforced. Specifically, an optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam is determined, and this optimal reinforcement scheme is used to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam. Furthermore, when the reinforcement condition for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing is met, a first cost for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing and a second cost for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with secondary beam welding are determined. Then, the reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost of the first and second costs is used to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0121] Therefore, by determining the secondary beam reinforcement method in the initial design stage, structural insecurity caused by relying on experience on site can be avoided. While ensuring structural safety, the final fixing method can be determined by comparing economic costs, which can reduce the support cost of secondary beam reinforcement while meeting the requirements of maximum layout capacity and structural safety.

[0122] For example, before the step of satisfying the reinforcement condition of adding a false beam bracing to the target main beam, the method includes:

[0123] Determine the undetermined dummy beam for which the target secondary beam will be reinforced by diagonal bracing on the target main beam;

[0124] Obtain the height of the columns supporting the target main beam, and the number of columns on the target main beam corresponding to the length range of the undetermined dummy beam;

[0125] Based on the column height and the number of columns, determine whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing are met.

[0126] Before determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam with dummy beam bracing on the target main beam, and the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam with welding on the target main beam, it is necessary to first determine whether the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam with dummy beam bracing on the target main beam are met.

[0127] First, determine the dummy beam to be reinforced by diagonal bracing of the target secondary beam onto the target main beam; then, obtain the column height supporting the target main beam and the number of columns within the length range of the dummy beam on the target main beam; finally, based on the column height and the number of columns, determine whether the reinforcement conditions for diagonal bracing of the target secondary beam onto the target main beam are met.

[0128] For example, the step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing, based on the column height and the number of columns, includes:

[0129] Determine whether the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height required for dummy beam bracing reinforcement of the target secondary beam;

[0130] If the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height, then determine whether the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns supporting the false beam when the target secondary beam is reinforced with false beam diagonal bracing;

[0131] If the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, then the current undetermined dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement condition of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0132] If the number of columns is less than the minimum number of columns, then when the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, the extended dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0133] When determining whether the reinforcement conditions for adding false beams and diagonal bracing to the target main beam are met based on the column height and number of columns, first determine whether the column height is greater than or equal to the minimum column height for adding false beams and diagonal bracing to the target secondary beam. Only when the column height is greater than or equal to the minimum column height for adding false beams and diagonal bracing to the target secondary beam will the situation of not being able to install false beams and diagonal bracing due to the columns being too short occur.

[0134] When the column height is greater than or equal to the minimum column height, it is further determined whether the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns supporting the dummy beam when reinforcing the target secondary beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing. When arranging the dummy beam, diagonal bracing must be installed simultaneously, and the diagonal bracing must be arranged at the column under the adjacent main beam (the column is located above the column base). In one embodiment, it is required that a dummy beam needs at least two diagonal bracing for fixation.

[0135] If the column height is greater than or equal to the minimum column height and the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, then the current undetermined dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing on the target main beam.

[0136] If the column height is greater than or equal to the minimum column height, but the number of columns is less than the minimum number of columns, then the number of columns corresponding to the false beam can be increased by extending the false beam. That is, in one embodiment, when the false beam does not meet the requirement of being fixed by at least two diagonal braces, it is determined whether the false beam can be extended to an adjacent column to make the number of columns corresponding to the extended false beam greater than two. (Refer to...) Figure 7 Thus, the extended false beam 2 can be fixed by at least two diagonal braces. It should be noted that the length of the extended false beam can be the distance between the two end columns, plus a smaller extension, to ensure that it can be supported by the two end columns.

[0137] For example, the step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing based on the column height and the number of columns further includes:

[0138] If the height of the column is less than the minimum column height, or if the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is less than the minimum number of columns, then a reinforcement scheme of secondary beam welding reinforcement is adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0139] When determining whether the reinforcement conditions for simulant beam bracing to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam are met based on the column height and number of columns, if the column height is less than the minimum column height for simulant beam bracing to reinforce the target secondary beam, it indicates that the column is too short to accommodate simulant beam bracing. In this case, the secondary beam is directly reinforced by welding to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0140] Alternatively, if the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is still less than the minimum number of columns, it means that the extended dummy beam cannot be supported by at least two columns. In this case, a reinforcement scheme of welding the secondary beam is directly adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0141] For example, the step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing includes:

[0142] Based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column supporting the target main beam, the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are output through a preset optimization algorithm.

[0143] The optimization objective of the preset optimization algorithm is to minimize the total cost of steel usage and welding of the dummy beam and diagonal brace. The steel usage cost is determined by the length of the diagonal brace and the length of the dummy beam, and the welding cost is determined by the number of welding points at both ends of the diagonal brace and at the intersection of the dummy beam and the secondary beam.

[0144] Based on the location of the target dummy beam and the installation location of the diagonal brace, determine the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0145] When determining the initial cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam with dummy beam bracing on the target main beam, based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column supporting the target main beam, a preset optimization algorithm outputs the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the bracing on the column to support the target dummy beam. In one embodiment, the preset optimization algorithm is a multi-objective genetic algorithm, whose neural network mainly includes an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer. It can be trained with a large amount of data to obtain the mapping relationship between the input and output. Its parameters are set as follows: 6 nodes in the input layer, 8 nodes in the hidden layer, 2 nodes in the output layer, a learning efficiency of 0.001, a training error target of 0.00001, and 10,000 training iterations.

[0146] In one embodiment, the origin of the coordinate system is the intersection of the cantilevered side column and the secondary beam, i.e., the top of the column is the origin of the coordinate system. The distance Lx from the dummy beam installation position to the column and the distance Ly from the top of the column to the diagonal brace installation position are determined by a multi-objective genetic algorithm. The total amount M of the dummy beam and diagonal brace and the material welding cost h can be determined by the dummy beam and diagonal brace installation positions with the optimal total cost P1.

[0147] For example, the step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing based on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes:

[0148] Determine the first distance between the target dummy beam and the target main beam, and determine the second distance between the installation position of the diagonal brace and the top of the column. Determine the length of the target diagonal brace based on the first distance and the second distance.

[0149] The target steel consumption cost is determined based on the target brace length and the target dummy beam length; the target welding cost is determined based on the number of welding points at both ends of the target brace and at the intersection of the target dummy beam and the target secondary beam.

[0150] The first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing is determined to be the cost of the target steel usage and the target welding cost.

[0151] In one embodiment, the values ​​of the first distance Lx between the target dummy beam and the target main beam, and the second distance Ly between the installation position of the diagonal brace and the apex of the column, directly affect the target steel consumption cost M and the target welding cost h. This ensures that the first cost P1 = M. min +h min Minimum value. Where: the length of the i-th diagonal brace. Total usage M = η(∑L i +L0). Where: L i L represents the length of the i-th diagonal brace, L0 represents the length of the dummy beam, η represents the material cost coefficient, and the welding cost h can be determined by counting the number of welding points (welding is required at both ends of the diagonal brace and at the intersection of the dummy beam and the secondary beam).

[0152] For example, after the step of outputting the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal bracing on the column to support the target dummy beam based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column using a preset optimization algorithm, the process includes:

[0153] The position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace are subjected to stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification to determine whether the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0154] If the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace do not meet the safety verification conditions, then based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column, a new position of the target dummy beam and a new installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are re-output through a preset optimization algorithm until the new position of the target dummy beam and the new installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0155] After the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace on the column are output based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column through a preset optimization algorithm, it is also necessary to perform a safety check on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace to ensure the safety of the construction.

[0156] If the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace do not meet the safety verification conditions of stress ratio and / or obstacle, then based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column, a new position of the target dummy beam and a new installation position of the diagonal brace on the column to support the target dummy beam are re-output through a preset optimization algorithm until the new position of the target dummy beam and the new installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0157] For example, the step of performing stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes:

[0158] By using a preset mechanical calculation model, determine whether the stress ratio corresponding to the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace is less than 1; and / or,

[0159] Determine the position of the target dummy beam and the diagonal brace corresponding to the installation position of the diagonal brace, and whether there is any interference between them and the obstacle.

[0160] In one embodiment, the first distance Lx between the target dummy beam and the target main beam, the second distance Ly between the installation position of the diagonal brace and the top of the column, and the length L0 of the dummy beam are substituted into the mechanical calculation model to determine whether the aforementioned positions and lengths satisfy whether the stress ratio σ1 is less than 1 (stress ratio: the ratio of the stress generated by a component under load to the maximum stress that the component can withstand).

[0161] When secondary beams are reinforced with dummy beam bracing, it is necessary to check whether the bracing interferes with obstacles. In one embodiment, refer to... Figure 8 When the installed diagonal bracing interferes with obstacles, it is impossible to place the diagonal bracing according to the optimal requirements, and it needs to be rearranged. Taking the intersection of the cantilevered side column and the secondary beam as the origin of the coordinate system, in... Figure 8In the diagram, the positive direction of the y-axis is downward. The distance from the dummy beam to the column is Lx, and the distance from the diagonal brace to the top of the column is Ly. The equation of the centerline at the diagonal brace can be determined as f(x,y)=Ax+By+c. Let the coordinates of the vertex of the obstacle's corner be (x0,y0). When f(x0,y0)=Ax0+by0+c≥0, it indicates that the diagonal brace intersects with the obstacle, and the installation position of the diagonal brace needs to be re-determined. This process continues until f(x0,y0)=Ax0+by0+c<0, indicating that there is no interference.

[0162] If the stress ratio is less than 1 and / or there is no interference with the obstacle, then the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace are confirmed to meet the safety verification conditions. By verifying whether the stress ratio is less than 1 and / or whether the installation of the diagonal brace of the dummy beam interferes with the obstacle, if the stress ratio is greater than 1 and / or there is interference, the installation position is re-optimized to ensure the feasibility of diagonal brace reinforcement.

[0163] For example, the step of determining the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam includes:

[0164] By using a pre-set mechanical calculation model, the length, width, and height of the target secondary beam for secondary beam reinforcement by welding are determined.

[0165] Based on the length, width, and height of the weld, determine the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam.

[0166] When determining the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam, a pre-set mechanical calculation model is used to determine the length, width, and height of the weld for this reinforcement. The length, width, and height of the weld can be understood as the top-view length and the length and width of the cross-section. Then, based on these dimensions, the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam is determined.

[0167] In the application scenario of the secondary beam reinforcement method of this application, refer to Figure 9When the secondary beam cantilever exceeds a corresponding threshold, the costs of two reinforcement schemes are determined based on factors such as column height, the number of columns on the dummy beam side to allow for the placement of diagonal braces, and whether the dummy beam can be extended to accommodate the required number of columns on its corresponding sides. If the secondary beam cantilever does not exceed the corresponding threshold, no reinforcement is required for any secondary beam. To determine the installation cost of the dummy beam and diagonal braces, a multi-objective genetic algorithm combined with a mechanical calculation model is used to optimize the positions of the dummy beam and diagonal braces. Safety checks are performed using stress ratios and interference between the diagonal braces and obstacles, ultimately yielding the safest and lowest-cost (P1) positions for the dummy beam and diagonal braces. If the optimal reinforcement scheme is not determined through cost comparison when all judgment conditions are not met, the secondary beam welding scheme is directly used for reinforcement. Then, the installation cost (P2) of the secondary beam welding scheme is calculated using the mechanical model. By comparing the installation costs (P1) of the dummy beam and diagonal braces and P2 of the secondary beam welding scheme, the lower-cost reinforcement scheme is determined, and the secondary beam is reinforced accordingly.

[0168] Therefore, (1) by reinforcing the support structure, the cost of the support can be reduced and the safety of the structure can be guaranteed while meeting the maximum arrangement capacity. The reinforcement method when the secondary beam exceeds the cantilever threshold can be determined in the initial design stage, avoiding on-site treatment based on experience, which may lead to structural insecurity. (2) For the area where the secondary beam is to be reinforced, the cost of the reinforcement method is effectively controlled by optimizing the location and using genetic algorithms and mechanical models to ensure structural safety. The final fixing method is determined by comparing economic costs while meeting structural safety. (3) By verifying the installation position of the false beam and the bracing area, the on-site construction feasibility is fully considered in the area where the bracing arrangement is not met, and the installation position is re-optimized to ensure the maximum number of components.

[0169] Reference Figure 10 Furthermore, this application embodiment also provides a secondary beam reinforcement device, the secondary beam reinforcement device comprising:

[0170] The acquisition module M1 is used to acquire the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the maximum capacity when arranging photovoltaic modules, and to determine the secondary beam whose cantilever length is greater than a preset length threshold as the target secondary beam to be reinforced. The length of the secondary beam cantilever is the distance between the endpoint of the secondary beam and the nearest adjacent target main beam.

[0171] The determination module M2 is used to determine the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam;

[0172] Module M3 is used to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam using the optimal reinforcement scheme.

[0173] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0174] When the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing are met, the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing is determined, and the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with secondary beam welding is determined.

[0175] The reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost between the first cost and the second cost is determined as the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0176] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0177] Before the step of satisfying the reinforcement condition of applying dummy beam bracing to the target main beam,

[0178] Determine the undetermined dummy beam for which the target secondary beam will be reinforced by diagonal bracing on the target main beam;

[0179] Obtain the height of the columns supporting the target main beam, and the number of columns on the target main beam corresponding to the length range of the undetermined dummy beam;

[0180] Based on the column height and the number of columns, determine whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing are met.

[0181] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0182] Determine whether the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height required for dummy beam bracing reinforcement of the target secondary beam;

[0183] If the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height, then determine whether the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns supporting the false beam when the target secondary beam is reinforced with false beam diagonal bracing;

[0184] If the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, then the current undetermined dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement condition of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0185] If the number of columns is less than the minimum number of columns, then when the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, the extended dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0186] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0187] If the height of the column is less than the minimum column height, or if the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is less than the minimum number of columns, then a reinforcement scheme of secondary beam welding reinforcement is adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

[0188] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0189] Based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column supporting the target main beam, the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are output through a preset optimization algorithm.

[0190] The optimization objective of the preset optimization algorithm is to minimize the total cost of steel usage and welding of the dummy beam and diagonal brace. The steel usage cost is determined by the length of the diagonal brace and the length of the dummy beam, and the welding cost is determined by the number of welding points at both ends of the diagonal brace and at the intersection of the dummy beam and the secondary beam.

[0191] Based on the location of the target dummy beam and the installation location of the diagonal brace, determine the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

[0192] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0193] Determine the first distance between the target dummy beam and the target main beam, and determine the second distance between the installation position of the diagonal brace and the top of the column. Determine the length of the target diagonal brace based on the first distance and the second distance.

[0194] The target steel consumption cost is determined based on the target brace length and the target dummy beam length; the target welding cost is determined based on the number of welding points at both ends of the target brace and at the intersection of the target dummy beam and the target secondary beam.

[0195] The first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing is determined to be the cost of the target steel usage and the target welding cost.

[0196] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0197] Following the step of outputting the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal braces on the column to support the target dummy beam using a preset optimization algorithm based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column,

[0198] The position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace are subjected to stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification to determine whether the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0199] If the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace do not meet the safety verification conditions, then based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column, a new position of the target dummy beam and a new installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are re-output through a preset optimization algorithm until the new position of the target dummy beam and the new installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions.

[0200] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0201] By using a preset mechanical calculation model, determine whether the stress ratio corresponding to the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace is less than 1; and / or,

[0202] Determine the position of the target dummy beam and the diagonal brace corresponding to the installation position of the diagonal brace, and whether there is any interference between them and the obstacle.

[0203] For example, the determining module is further configured to:

[0204] By using a pre-set mechanical calculation model, the length, width, and height of the target secondary beam for secondary beam reinforcement by welding are determined.

[0205] Based on the length, width, and height of the weld, determine the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam.

[0206] The secondary beam reinforcement device provided in this application employs the secondary beam reinforcement method described in the above embodiments, aiming to reinforce secondary beams. Compared with conventional technology, the beneficial effects of the secondary beam reinforcement device provided in this application are the same as those of the secondary beam reinforcement method described in the above embodiments, and other technical features in the secondary beam reinforcement device are the same as those disclosed in the methods of the above embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0207] Furthermore, this application embodiment also provides a secondary beam reinforcement device, which includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the secondary beam reinforcement method as described above.

[0208] Furthermore, embodiments of this application also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the secondary beam reinforcement method described above.

[0209] It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or system that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or system. Unless otherwise specified, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or system that includes that element.

[0210] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that the methods of the above embodiments can be implemented by means of software plus necessary general-purpose hardware platforms. Of course, they can also be implemented by hardware, but in many cases the former is a better implementation method. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to conventional technology, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium (such as ROM / RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) as described above, and includes several instructions to cause a terminal device (which may be a mobile phone, computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute the methods described in the various embodiments of this application.

[0211] The above are merely preferred embodiments of this application and do not limit the patent scope of this application. Any equivalent structural or procedural transformations made using the content of this application's specification and drawings, or direct or indirect applications in other related technical fields, are similarly included within the patent protection scope of this application.

Claims

1. A method for reinforcing secondary beams, characterized in that, The method includes: Obtain the length of the secondary beam cantilever corresponding to the maximum capacity when arranging photovoltaic modules, and determine the secondary beam whose cantilever length is greater than a preset length threshold as the target secondary beam to be reinforced, wherein the length of the secondary beam cantilever is the distance between the endpoint of the secondary beam and the nearest adjacent target main beam; Determine the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam; Using the optimal reinforcement scheme, the target secondary beam is reinforced to the target main beam; The step of determining the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam includes: When the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing are met, the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing is determined, and the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with secondary beam welding is determined. The reinforcement scheme corresponding to the lower cost between the first cost and the second cost is determined as the optimal reinforcement scheme for reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam; The step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing includes: Based on the cantilever length of the secondary beam and the height of the column supporting the target main beam, the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target dummy beam are output through a preset optimization algorithm. The optimization objective of the preset optimization algorithm is to minimize the total cost of steel consumption and welding of the dummy beam and diagonal brace. The steel consumption cost is determined by the length of the diagonal brace and the length of the dummy beam, and the welding cost is determined by the number of welding points at both ends of the diagonal brace and at the intersection of the dummy beam and the secondary beam. The position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace are subjected to stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification to determine whether the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions. If the position of the target false beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace do not meet the safety verification conditions, then based on the length of the secondary beam cantilever and the height of the column, a new position of the target false beam and a new installation position of the diagonal brace on the column for supporting the target false beam are re-output through a preset optimization algorithm until the new position of the target false beam and the new installation position of the diagonal brace meet the safety verification conditions. Based on the location of the target dummy beam and the installation location of the diagonal brace, determine the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

2. The secondary beam reinforcement method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, Before the step of satisfying the reinforcement condition of applying a false beam bracing to the target main beam, the following steps are included: Determine the undetermined dummy beam for which the target secondary beam will be reinforced by diagonal bracing on the target main beam; Obtain the height of the columns supporting the target main beam, and the number of columns on the target main beam corresponding to the length range of the undetermined dummy beam; Based on the column height and the number of columns, determine whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing are met.

3. The secondary beam reinforcement method as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for applying dummy beam bracing to the target main beam based on the column height and the number of columns are met includes: Determine whether the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height required for dummy beam bracing reinforcement of the target secondary beam; If the height of the column is greater than or equal to the minimum column height, then determine whether the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns supporting the false beam when the target secondary beam is reinforced with false beam diagonal bracing; If the number of columns is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, then the current undetermined dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement condition of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing. If the number of columns is less than the minimum number of columns, then when the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is greater than or equal to the minimum number of columns, the extended dummy beam is determined to meet the reinforcement conditions for reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing.

4. The secondary beam reinforcement method as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The step of determining whether the reinforcement conditions for attaching the target secondary beam to the target main beam using dummy beam bracing, based on the column height and the number of columns, further includes: If the height of the column is less than the minimum column height, or if the conditions for extending the dummy beam are met and the number of columns corresponding to the extended dummy beam is less than the minimum number of columns, then a reinforcement scheme of secondary beam welding reinforcement is adopted to reinforce the target secondary beam onto the target main beam.

5. The secondary beam reinforcement method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of determining the first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam onto the target main beam with dummy beam diagonal bracing based on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes: Determine the first distance between the target dummy beam and the target main beam, and determine the second distance between the installation position of the diagonal brace and the top of the column. Determine the length of the target diagonal brace based on the first distance and the second distance. The target steel consumption cost is determined based on the target brace length and the target dummy beam length; the target welding cost is determined based on the number of welding points at both ends of the target brace and at the intersection of the target dummy beam and the target secondary beam. The first cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam to the target main beam with dummy beam bracing is determined to be the cost of the target steel usage and the target welding cost.

6. The secondary beam reinforcement method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of performing stress ratio and / or obstacle safety verification on the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace includes: By using a preset mechanical calculation model, determine whether the stress ratio corresponding to the position of the target dummy beam and the installation position of the diagonal brace is less than 1; and / or, Determine the position of the target dummy beam and the diagonal brace corresponding to the installation position of the diagonal brace, and whether there is any interference between them and the obstacle.

7. The secondary beam reinforcement method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of determining the second cost of welding the target secondary beam to the target main beam includes: By using a pre-set mechanical calculation model, the length, width, and height of the target secondary beam for secondary beam reinforcement by welding are determined. Based on the length, width, and height of the weld, determine the second cost of reinforcing the target secondary beam by welding it onto the target main beam.

8. A secondary beam reinforcement device, characterized in that, The secondary beam reinforcement device includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the computer program, when executed by the processor, implements the steps of the secondary beam reinforcement method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the secondary beam reinforcement method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images