Method, device, system and medium for reinforcing weak part of prefabricated component

Abstract

The present application relates to the technical field of fabricated building, and discloses a reinforcing treatment method, device, system and medium for weak parts of prefabricated components. The reinforcing treatment method comprises the following steps: obtaining part information of the prefabricated component; determining whether the prefabricated component has weak parts according to the part information; determining that the prefabricated component has weak parts, and determining whether to arrange reinforcing bars according to the weakening degree of the weak parts on the prefabricated component; and determining to arrange reinforcing bars, and generating arrangement information of the reinforcing bars according to the arrangement rules of the reinforcing bars and the position information of the weak parts on the prefabricated component. The weak parts are determined from the part information of the prefabricated component, the reinforcing bars are arranged according to the weakening degree of the weak parts on the prefabricated component, and the arrangement information of the reinforcing bars is generated according to the arrangement rules of the reinforcing bars and the position information of the weak parts, so that the reinforcing bars can be automatically arranged, intelligent arrangement of the reinforcing bars is realized, and the arrangement efficiency is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of prefabricated building technology, specifically to methods, devices, systems, and media for strengthening weak parts of prefabricated components. Background Technology

[0002] In the design process of Building Information Modeling (BIM) for prefabricated walls, some weak wall structures may be encountered, such as when openings are made in the wall or embedded parts are placed in the wall. Corresponding reinforcement treatment is required. Currently, the common practice is for users to reinforce the steel bars according to business rules (standards or atlases), and the corresponding reinforcement steel bars are added manually. This method has a low level of automation and is inefficient. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In view of this, the present invention provides a method, device, system and medium for strengthening weak parts of precast components, so as to solve the problem of low efficiency caused by manually adding corresponding reinforcing steel bars.

[0004] In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for strengthening weak parts of precast components, comprising the following steps: obtaining part information of the precast component; determining whether the precast component has weak parts based on the part information; determining whether the precast component has weak parts and whether to arrange reinforcing ribs based on the degree of weakening of the precast component by the weak parts; determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs and generating reinforcing rib arrangement information based on the arrangement rules of reinforcing ribs and the position information of the weak parts on the precast component.

[0005] Beneficial effects: Weak parts are identified from the component information of precast components. The degree of weakening of the precast components by the weak parts determines the arrangement of reinforcing bars. The arrangement information of reinforcing bars is generated according to the arrangement rules of reinforcing bars and the location information of weak parts. The above method can automatically arrange reinforcing bars, realize intelligent arrangement of reinforcing bars, and improve the arrangement efficiency of reinforcing bars.

[0006] In one optional implementation, the step of determining the arrangement of reinforcing ribs and generating reinforcing rib arrangement information based on the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs and the position information of the weak part on the precast component includes: establishing a three-dimensional coordinate system with a point on the precast component as the origin; determining whether to set a reference datum based on the parameter information of the weak part; determining to set a reference datum and generating the coordinate information of the reinforcing ribs based on the coordinate information of the reference datum and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs; determining not to set a reference datum and generating the coordinate information of the reinforcing ribs based on the coordinate information of the weak part and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs.

[0007] Beneficial effects: The position and length of the reinforcing rib can be determined based on its coordinate information. The calculation of the reinforcing rib's coordinate information using a three-dimensional coordinate system provides a geometric basis, making it easier and more accurate to calculate the reinforcing rib's coordinate information.

[0008] In one optional implementation, the reinforcement method further includes the following steps: determining that no reference datum is set, calculating several coordinate points of the weak part based on the part information to obtain the coordinate information of the weak part; determining that a reference datum is set, calculating several coordinate points of the reference datum based on the part information and the arrangement rules of the reference datum to obtain the coordinate information of the reference datum.

[0009] Beneficial effects: When the weak part is a hole, the coordinate information of the weak part can be obtained through the part information. Then, based on the coordinate information of the weak part and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs, the coordinate information of the reinforcing ribs can be generated, resulting in accurate and reliable calculations. When the weak part is an embedded part, the position and size of the reference datum need to be determined before arranging the reinforcing ribs, which facilitates the calculation of the position of the reinforcing ribs.

[0010] In one optional implementation, the step of determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs based on the degree of weakening of the precast component by the weak part includes: when the weak part is an opening set inside the precast component, determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs based on the size of the opening; when the weak part is a cut set on the edge of the precast component, determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs; when the weak part is an embedded part, determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs based on the parameter information of the embedded part.

[0011] Beneficial effects: The size of the opening affects the weakening effect on the precast component to varying degrees. When the weakening effect of the opening is significant, a reinforcing hidden beam is installed; when the weakening effect is minor, reinforcing ribs are installed; when the weakening effect is negligible, no reinforcing ribs are installed. The placement of reinforcing ribs is determined based on the size of the opening, ensuring accuracy and reliability. The type and size of embedded parts also affect the weakening effect on the precast component. For example, embedded parts such as formwork holes, hangers, and conduits weaken the precast component very little, so no reinforcing ribs are installed; however, embedded parts such as handholes and junction boxes have slightly larger diameters and areas, weakening the precast component to some extent, thus requiring reinforcement by installing reinforcing ribs. The placement of reinforcing ribs is determined based on the parameters of the embedded parts, ensuring accuracy and reliability.

[0012] In one optional implementation, the step of determining whether to install reinforcing ribs based on the size of the opening includes: when the opening is polygonal, determining whether the length of at least one side of the opening is greater than 800mm; if the length of at least one side of the opening is greater than or equal to 800mm, determining to install a reinforcing hidden beam; if the length of each side of the opening is less than 800mm, determining whether the length of each side of the opening is greater than 300mm; if the length of each side of the opening is greater than 300mm, determining to install reinforcing ribs; if the length of each side of the opening is less than or equal to 300mm, determining not to install reinforcing ribs; when the opening is circular, determining whether the diameter of the opening is greater than or equal to 800mm; if the diameter of the opening is greater than or equal to 800mm, determining to install a hidden beam for reinforcement; if the diameter of the opening is less than 800mm, determining whether the diameter of the opening is greater than 300mm; if the diameter of the opening is greater than 300mm, determining to install reinforcing ribs; if the diameter of the opening is less than or equal to 300mm, determining not to install reinforcing ribs or to install reinforcing ribs.

[0013] In one optional embodiment, the reinforcement processing method further includes the following steps: determining whether the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs collides with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component; determining that the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs collides with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component, adjusting the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs according to the adjustment rules of the reinforcing ribs, and after adjustment, continuing to determine whether the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs collides with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component, until the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs collides with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component.

[0014] Beneficial effects: After the reinforcement bars are laid out, there are sometimes collisions between the reinforcement bars and the distribution bars. It is necessary to check for collisions between the reinforcement bars and the distribution bars to prevent interference.

[0015] In one optional implementation, the reinforcement method further includes the following steps: using the arrangement information of the reinforcing bars, the parameter information of the pre-set reinforcing bars, and the part information of the precast component, to statistically analyze the attribute information of all the reinforcing bars in the precast component and generate an attribute information table of all the reinforcing bars in the precast component.

[0016] Beneficial effects: After all the designs are completed, the reinforcement bars are counted. A project may have thousands of PC components. If the reinforcement bars of each component are counted manually, the workload is huge. Here, the statistics are directly performed by computer program. The basic statistical method is to count the type, number, quantity, processing size, weight, and length of the reinforcement bars. Automated statistics can greatly reduce the workload of manual counting of reinforcement bars.

[0017] Secondly, the present invention also provides a reinforcement processing device for weak parts of precast components, used to perform the above-described reinforcement processing method. The reinforcement processing device includes: an acquisition module for acquiring part information of the precast component; a first judgment module for judging whether the precast component has weak parts based on the part information; a second judgment module for determining whether the precast component has weak parts and judging whether to arrange reinforcing ribs based on the degree of weakening of the precast component by the weak parts; and an arrangement information generation module for determining the arrangement of reinforcing ribs and generating arrangement information of reinforcing ribs based on the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs and the position information of the weak parts on the precast component.

[0018] Thirdly, the present invention also provides a reinforcement system for weak parts of prefabricated components, comprising: at least one processor; a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by a processor, the instructions being executed by the at least one processor to cause the at least one processor to perform the reinforcement method described above.

[0019] Fourthly, the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions for causing a computer to perform the above-described enhanced processing method. Attached Figure Description

[0020] To more clearly illustrate the specific embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the specific embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained from these drawings without creative effort.

[0021] Figure 1 This is a schematic flowchart of a method for strengthening weak parts of prefabricated components according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0022] Figure 2 This is a schematic flowchart of a method for strengthening weak parts of prefabricated components according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0023] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0024] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0025] Figure 5 This is a structural schematic diagram of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0026] Figure 6 This is a structural schematic diagram of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0027] Figure 7 This is a structural schematic diagram of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0028] Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram of a prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention, with a coordinate system established at the lower left corner.

[0029] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention, with a coordinate system established at the lower left corner point;

[0030] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which a coordinate system is established and a reference is set at the lower left corner point;

[0031] Figure 11 This is a schematic diagram of the parameter setting box for the reinforcing ribs displayed on the user terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0032] Figure 12 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a precast component in which the reinforcing steel bars are offset from the opening, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0033] Figure 13 This is a schematic diagram of a prefabricated component with a reinforcing hidden beam arranged on one side of a rectangular opening, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0034] Figure 14 This is a schematic diagram of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which reinforcing ribs are arranged on each side of a rectangular opening;

[0035] Figure 15 This is a schematic diagram of a prefabricated component according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which bent steel bars are distributed on each side of a rectangular opening;

[0036] Figure 16 for Figure 15 A schematic diagram of a prefabricated component with bent reinforcing bars distributed on one side of a rectangular opening;

[0037] Figure 17 This is a schematic diagram of a prefabricated component according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which reinforcing ribs are arranged on the lower and right sides of the cut.

[0038] Figure 18 This is a schematic diagram of a prefabricated component according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which reinforcing ribs are arranged on the upper, lower, left and right sides of a circular opening;

[0039] Figure 19 This is a front view of a prefabricated component after the reinforcement bars have been arranged, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0040] Figure 20 for Figure 19A magnified view of part A in the diagram;

[0041] Figure 21 for Figure 19 Left view of the prefabricated component;

[0042] Figure 22 This is a front view of another prefabricated component according to an embodiment of the present invention after the reinforcement bars have been arranged;

[0043] Figure 23 for Figure 22 A magnified view of part B in the diagram.

[0044] Explanation of reference numerals in the attached figures:

[0045] 1. Precast components; 101. Holes; 102. Junction boxes; 103. Conduits; 104. Handholes; 105. Formwork holes; 106. Lifting rings; 107. Reinforcing ribs; 108. Reinforcing hidden beams; 109. Distribution reinforcement; 201. Baseline; 202. Base box. Detailed Implementation

[0046] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0047] In prefabricated components such as prefabricated walls in prefabricated buildings, it is often necessary to install some embedded parts or make openings in the wall. During the relevant design process, this can lead to weak areas in the wall, requiring the installation of wall reinforcement bars.

[0048] The following is combined Figures 1 to 23 The following describes embodiments of the present invention.

[0049] According to an embodiment of the present invention, in a first aspect, a method for strengthening weak parts of a precast component is provided, comprising the following steps:

[0050] S10: Obtain the part information of prefabricated component 1. The part information of prefabricated component 1 includes its name, type, dimensions, embedded parts, and other relevant component information.

[0051] S20: Determine whether precast component 1 has weak parts based on the component information.

[0052] Specifically, based on the dimensional information and embedded part information of the parts, it is determined whether the prefabricated component 1 has weak parts. Weak parts include holes 101, embedded parts, etc. For example, it can be determined from the dimensional information whether the prefabricated component 1 has holes 101, and it can be determined from the embedded part information whether the prefabricated component 1 has embedded parts.

[0053] S30: Determine whether to arrange reinforcing ribs 107 based on the degree of weakening of precast component 1 by the weak part.

[0054] Specifically, when the weak part is the hole 101, the type and size of the hole 101 affect the degree of weakening of the precast component 1. For example, when the hole 101 is a cut at the edge of the precast component 1, part of the strength of the precast component 1 is weakened, and a reinforcing rib 107 is arranged. When the hole 101 is an opening inside the precast component 1, the size of the hole 101 affects the degree of weakening of the precast component 1 less, and a reinforcing rib 107 is arranged. When the weak part is the embedded part, the type of embedded part affects the degree of weakening of the precast component 1 differently. For example, embedded parts such as the formwork hole 105, the hanger, and the conduit 103 weaken the precast component 1 very little, and no reinforcing rib 107 is arranged. Embedded parts such as the hand hole and the junction box 102 have a slightly larger hole area, which will weaken the precast component 1 to a certain extent, and therefore need to be reinforced, and a reinforcing rib 107 is arranged.

[0055] S40: Determine the arrangement of reinforcing ribs 107, and generate the arrangement information of reinforcing ribs 107 according to the arrangement rules of reinforcing ribs 107 and the position information of weak parts on precast components 1.

[0056] Specifically, the arrangement rules of the reinforcing rib 107 include the distance of the reinforcing rib 107 from the edge of the weak part, the length of the reinforcing rib 107 extending beyond the edge of the weak part, and the thickness of the protective layer. The arrangement information of the reinforcing rib 107 includes the location information of the reinforcing rib 107, the size information of the reinforcing rib 107, and other information required to generate the reinforcing rib 107.

[0057] By applying the reinforcement processing method of this embodiment, weak parts are identified from the part information of the precast component 1. The degree of weakening of the precast component 1 by the weak parts is used to determine the arrangement of reinforcing ribs 107. The arrangement information of reinforcing ribs 107 is generated according to the arrangement rules of reinforcing ribs 107 and the location information of the weak parts. The above method can automatically arrange the reinforcing bars, realize the intelligent arrangement of reinforcing ribs 107, and improve the arrangement efficiency of reinforcing ribs 107.

[0058] It should be noted that the part information is stored in the component model, which is a pre-stored model of each component for which reinforcement is to be generated. The component model can be BIM, etc. Precast component 1 is a precast wall, etc.

[0059] It is worth noting that, such as Figures 3 to 7 As shown, the hole 101 includes openings inside the precast component and cuts at the edge of the precast component. The openings are rectangular, circular, etc. The embedded parts include junction boxes 102, conduits 103, hand holes 104, pull-out holes 105, lifting rings 106, etc.

[0060] In one embodiment, the step of determining the arrangement of reinforcing ribs 107 and generating arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs 107 based on the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs 107 and the position information of the weak parts on the precast component 1 includes:

[0061] S401: Establish a three-dimensional coordinate system with a point on precast component 1 as the origin (e.g., ... Figure 8 (as shown);

[0062] S402: Determine whether to set a reference benchmark based on the parameter information of the weak part;

[0063] S403: Determine the setting of the reference datum, and generate the coordinate information of the stiffener 107 according to the coordinate information of the reference datum and the arrangement rules of the stiffener 107;

[0064] S404: Determine that no reference datum is set, and generate the coordinate information of the stiffener 107 based on the coordinate information of the weak part and the arrangement rules of the stiffener 107. The coordinate information includes the coordinates of the two endpoints of the stiffener 107.

[0065] Specifically, the parameter information of the weak part includes the type and size information of the weak part. The type of the weak part is hole 101, embedded part, etc. When the weak part is hole 101, no reference datum needs to be set. When the weak part is embedded part, a reference datum can be set.

[0066] The position and length of the reinforcing rib 107 can be determined based on its coordinate information. The calculation of the coordinate information of the reinforcing rib 107 using a three-dimensional coordinate system provides a geometric basis, making it easier and more accurate to calculate the coordinate information of the reinforcing rib 107.

[0067] Furthermore, the origin can be a corner point of the prefabricated component 1. For example, when the prefabricated component 1 is placed vertically, the origin is the lower left corner point of the prefabricated component 1 (e.g., Figure 8 (As shown). It can be understood that the origin can also be the upper left corner, lower right corner, or a point inside the prefabricated component 1.

[0068] In this embodiment, the reinforcement method further includes the following steps: determining that no reference datum is set, calculating several coordinate points of the weak part based on the part information to obtain the coordinate information of the weak part. When the weak part is a hole 101, the coordinate information of the weak part is obtained through the part information, and then the coordinate information of the reinforcing rib 107 is generated based on the coordinate information of the weak part and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing rib 107, which is accurate and reliable.

[0069] In this embodiment, the enhanced processing method further includes the following steps: determining and setting a reference datum, and calculating several coordinate points of the reference datum according to the part information and the arrangement rules of the reference datum to obtain the coordinate information of the reference datum.

[0070] It should be noted that the arrangement rules of the reference reference include the location information of the reference reference and the size information of the reference reference. When the weak part is an embedded part, the location and size of the reference reference need to be determined before the stiffener 107 is arranged, so as to facilitate the calculation of the location of the stiffener 107.

[0071] Specifically, when setting reference benchmarks, the form of the reference benchmark is determined based on the parameter information of the weak part. Reference benchmark forms include benchmark lines 201 and benchmark boxes 202, etc. For some relatively small or slender embedded parts, a benchmark line 201 is generally set at the upper edge of the embedded part or above the upper edge of the embedded part, such as junction boxes 102, sleeves, support embedded parts, decorative embedded parts, etc. Generally, a benchmark line 201 is set at the upper edge of the embedded part, and the length of the benchmark line extends 30-50mm beyond the edge of the embedded part. For some larger and relatively regular embedded parts, such as handholes 104, some equipment embedded parts, etc., more than one reinforcing bar may be set. The embedded part can be abstracted into a benchmark box 202. A benchmark box refers to the smallest rectangle that can cover or surround the embedded part, facilitating the placement of reinforcing bars.

[0072] It is worth noting that when the baseline 201 is set at the upper edge of the embedded part, a reinforcing rib 107 is arranged above the baseline 201; when the baseline 201 is set above the upper edge of the embedded part, the reinforcing rib 107 can be arranged at the location of the baseline 201.

[0073] In this embodiment, the step of determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs 107 based on the degree of weakening of the precast component 1 by the weak part includes: when the weak part is an opening located inside the precast component 1, determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs 107 based on the size of the opening; the degree of weakening of the precast component 1 by the size of the opening varies, and when the size of the opening 101 has a large degree of weakening effect on the precast component 1, a reinforcing hidden beam 108 is arranged; when the size of the opening 101 has a small degree of weakening effect on the precast component 1, reinforcing ribs 107 are arranged; when the size of the opening 101 has a negligible degree of weakening effect on the precast component 1, no reinforcing ribs 107 are arranged. Determining the arrangement of reinforcing ribs 107 based on the size of the opening ensures accurate and reliable arrangement.

[0074] Specifically, the steps for determining whether to install reinforcing ribs 107 based on the size of the opening include:

[0075] When the opening is polygonal, determine whether the length of at least one side of the opening is greater than 800mm;

[0076] Determine that the length of at least one side of the opening is greater than or equal to 800 mm, and determine the arrangement of a reinforcing hidden beam 108;

[0077] Determine if the length of each side of the opening is less than 800mm, and then determine if the length of each side of the opening is greater than 300mm.

[0078] Ensure that the length of each side of the opening is greater than 300mm, and determine the placement of 107 reinforcing ribs;

[0079] If the length of each side of the opening is less than or equal to 300mm, then no reinforcing ribs (107) will be installed.

[0080] When the length of at least one side of the opening is greater than or equal to 800mm, the arrangement of the opening necessitates the cutting of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component 1, thereby weakening the strength of this part of the precast component 1. Therefore, a reinforcing hidden beam 108 is arranged on one side of the opening, and reinforcing bars 107 are arranged on the other sides of the opening. The reinforcing hidden beam 108 refers to a number of reinforcing bars arranged on one side of the opening, including two horizontal reinforcing bars and several vertical reinforcing bars, to strengthen the structural bearing capacity. This is equivalent to placing an invisible beam in the structure. The distribution of the reinforcing bars is as follows: Figure 13 As shown. When the length of each side of the opening is less than 800mm and greater than 300mm, since the weakening effect of the opening on the precast component 1 is relatively small, only reinforcing bars need to be arranged at the edge of the opening. The distance from the reinforcing bar to the edge of the opening is ProtectT+R0 / 2, and the distance from the end of the reinforcing bar to the edge is the extension length L. The distribution of the reinforcing bars is as follows. Figure 14As shown. When the length of each side of the opening is less than or equal to 300mm, the weakening of the precast component 1 can be ignored. Therefore, the reinforcing bars at the edge of the opening area are bent, and no separate reinforcing bars 107 are arranged. The bending slope is generally 1:6, and the reinforcing bars are distributed as shown. Figure 15 and Figure 16 As shown in Figure 16, the zigzag slope refers to the ratio of the first distance D1 to the second distance D2 of the slope.

[0081] It should be noted that ProtectT refers to the thickness of the protective layer, and R0 is the diameter of the reinforcing steel.

[0082] Furthermore, the shape of the opening is rectangular or hexagonal, etc.

[0083] The following explains the calculation process for determining the coordinates of reinforcing bars for rectangular openings with dimensions between 300mm and 800mm:

[0084] like Figure 8 and Figure 14 As shown, the coordinates of each point of the opening need to be determined first. Using the coordinates of the wall origin (X0, Y0, Z0) and the relative distances H0 and W0 from the starting point of the opening to the wall origin, the starting point (X_hole, Y_hole, Z_hole) of the opening can be calculated, where X_hole = X0 + W0, Y_hole = Y0 + H0, and Z_hole = Z0. In counterclockwise order, the four coordinates of the rectangular opening are (X_hole, Y_hole, Z_hole), (X_hole + holeLenth, Y_hole, Z_hole), (X_hole + holeLenth, Y_hole + holeWidth, Z_hole), and (X_hole, Y_hole + holeWidth, Z_hole). Then, using the relative distance between the reinforcing steel bar and the edge of the opening, calculate the coordinates of the two endpoints of the reinforcing steel bar above the opening: (X_hole-L, Y_hole+holeWidth+ProtectT+R0 / 2, Z_hole) and (X_hole+holeLength+L, Y_hole+holeWidth+ProtectT+R0 / 2, Z_hole). The calculation process for other reinforcing bars at the edge of the rectangular opening is similar.

[0085] It should be noted that the starting point of the opening refers to the lower left point of the opening. H0 and W0 can be obtained directly from the part information. Hole Width is the width dimension of the opening, holeLenth is the length dimension of the opening, ProtectT is the thickness of the protective layer, R0 is the diameter of the reinforcing bar, and the two ends of the reinforcing bar refer to the two ends of the center line of the reinforcing bar.

[0086] Specifically, the steps for determining whether to install reinforcing ribs 107 based on the size of the opening include:

[0087] When the opening is circular, determine whether the diameter of the opening is greater than or equal to 800mm;

[0088] Determine that the diameter of the opening is greater than or equal to 800mm, and then determine the placement of a hidden beam for reinforcement.

[0089] If the diameter of the opening is determined to be less than 800mm, then determine whether the diameter of the opening is greater than 300mm.

[0090] Determine that the diameter of the opening is greater than 300mm, and determine the placement of reinforcing ribs 107;

[0091] If the diameter of the opening is less than or equal to 300mm, determine whether to install reinforcing rib 107 or not.

[0092] Specifically, for circular openings with a diameter of 300mm or less, only two reinforcing bars are required, or no separate reinforcing bars are needed. However, care must be taken to ensure that the distributed reinforcing bars of precast component 1 avoid the opening, and the bending slope of the reinforcing bars is generally 1:6. When the circular opening is greater than 300mm but less than 800mm, four reinforcing bars are required, and the distribution of the reinforcing bars is as follows: Figure 18 As shown.

[0093] In this embodiment, the step of determining whether to arrange a reinforcing rib 107 based on the degree of weakening of the precast component 1 by the weak part includes: when the weak part is a cut at the edge of the precast component 1, it is determined that a reinforcing rib 107 should be arranged. The cut weakens part of the strength of the precast component 1, so a reinforcing rib 107 needs to be arranged.

[0094] Specifically, for the case of the cut, one horizontal and one vertical reinforcing bar are installed. The rules for the placement of the reinforcing bar are as follows: the distance between the reinforcing bar and the edge of the wall is equal to the thickness of the protective layer; the extension length of the reinforcing bar within the wall is L; and the distribution of the reinforcing bar is as follows. Figure 17 As shown.

[0095] In this embodiment, the step of determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs 107 based on the degree of weakening of the precast component 1 by the weak part includes: when the weak part is an embedded part, determining whether to arrange reinforcing ribs 107 based on the parameter information of the embedded part. The parameter information of the embedded part includes the type and size of the embedded part. The degree of weakening of the precast component 1 varies depending on the type and size of the embedded part. For example, embedded parts such as formwork holes 105, hangers, and conduits 103 weaken the precast component 1 to a very small degree, so no reinforcing ribs 107 are arranged; however, embedded parts such as handholes and junction boxes 102 have slightly larger hole diameters and will weaken the precast component 1 to a certain extent, thus requiring reinforcement by arranging reinforcing ribs 107. Determining the arrangement of reinforcing ribs 107 based on the parameter information of the embedded part ensures accurate and reliable arrangement.

[0096] Specifically, for handhole 104 and junction box 102, a reinforcing steel bar is generally arranged at the upper edge of handhole 104 and junction box 102. The rules for arranging the reinforcing steel bar are as follows: the extension length of the reinforcing steel bar on one side of the wall is L, and the distance between the reinforcing steel bar and the edge of the wall is the thickness of the protective layer.

[0097] In one embodiment, the enhanced processing method further includes the following steps:

[0098] Determine whether the arrangement information of the reinforcing bar 107 collides with the arrangement information of the reinforcing bars of the precast component 1;

[0099] If the arrangement information of the reinforcing rib 107 is found to collide with the arrangement information of the reinforcing bars of the precast component 1, the arrangement information of the reinforcing rib 107 is adjusted according to the adjustment rules of the reinforcing rib 107. After adjustment, it is continued to determine whether the arrangement information of the reinforcing rib 107 collides with the arrangement information of the reinforcing bars of the precast component 1, until the arrangement information of the reinforcing rib 107 does not collide with the arrangement information of the reinforcing bars of the precast component 1.

[0100] After the reinforcement bars are arranged, sometimes there may be collisions between the reinforcement bars and the distribution bars 109. A collision check is necessary to prevent interference between the reinforcement bars and distribution bars 109. If a collision occurs, the coordinates are automatically adjusted, typically by about 20mm, until the collisions no longer occur. The reinforcement bar collision check and adjustment process is as follows: Figures 19 to 23 As shown, in Figure 22 and Figure 23 In the cut, the reinforcing bar on the lower side of the cut did not collide with the distribution bar 109, while the reinforcing bar on the right side of the cut collided with the distribution bar 109, causing the reinforcing bar on the right side of the cut to be shifted inward by approximately 20mm; Figure 19 and Figure 20In the middle, the reinforcing steel bar above the junction box 102 did not collide with the distribution steel bar 109, but the reinforcing steel bar above the handhole 104 collided with the distribution steel bar 109, causing the reinforcing steel bar above the handhole 104 to be moved upward by about 20mm.

[0101] It should be noted that distribution reinforcement refers to the horizontal and vertical reinforcement of precast components. Horizontal reinforcement refers to the length of the precast component, and vertical reinforcement refers to its height. Figure 20 and Figure 23 In the text, the slender dashed rectangle refers to the reinforcing bars that collide with the distributed reinforcing bars.

[0102] It is worth noting that reinforcing steel bars can be simply referred to as reinforcing bars.

[0103] In one embodiment, the enhanced processing method further includes the following steps:

[0104] Using the arrangement information of reinforcing ribs 107, the pre-set parameter information of reinforcing ribs 107, and the part information of precast component 1, the attribute information of all reinforcing bars in precast component 1 is statistically analyzed, and an attribute information table of all reinforcing bars in precast component 1 is generated. It should be noted that the pre-set parameter information of reinforcing ribs 107 includes the diameter, strength grade, and extension length L of reinforcing ribs 107, etc., and a parameter setting box for reinforcing ribs 107 will be displayed on the user terminal, such as... Figure 11 As shown, select the corresponding parameter value from the drop-down options for each parameter in the parameter setting box. The attribute information of the reinforcing steel includes its location, type, number, specifications, quantity, processing dimensions, weight, and length.

[0105] Specifically, such as Figure 12 As shown, under normal circumstances, the diameter R0 of the reinforcing steel is 12mm, the protective layer thickness (ProtectT) is 15mm, the steel grade is HRB400, and the distance from the centerline of the steel bar to the edge of the opening is generally ProtectT + R0 / 2. However, some extreme cases need to be considered, such as a steel bar extension length L of 500mm. Figure 17 As shown, if the reinforcing bar has already extended beyond the rib, the extension length needs to be adjusted, with L being -ProtectT.

[0106] It should be noted that, in Figure 9 , Figure 10 , Figure 12 , Figure 13 , Figure 14 In this context, Length refers to the length of the precast component, Height refers to the height of the precast component, Hole Length refers to the length of the opening, and Hole Width refers to the width of the opening.

[0107] After all the designs are completed, the reinforcement bars are counted. A project may have thousands of PC components. If the reinforcement bars of each component are counted manually, the workload will be huge. Here, the statistics are directly performed by computer program. The basic statistical method is to count the type, number, quantity, processing size, weight, and length of the reinforcement bars. Automated statistics can greatly reduce the workload of manual counting of reinforcement bars. The statistical table is shown in Table 1 below.

[0108] Table 1

[0109]

[0110] In related technologies, the manual addition of reinforcing steel bars results in low levels of automation and inefficiency. However, the steel reinforcement method proposed in this application can automatically arrange reinforcing steel bars in different weak areas caused by factors such as wall openings or embedded parts, improving the efficiency of reinforcing steel bar placement in wall openings and embedded parts. This effectively solves the problem of low automation and inefficiency caused by manually adding reinforcing steel bars one by one to weak points.

[0111] In related technologies, it is impossible to automatically detect collisions between reinforcing steel bars and wall reinforcement. However, this application, through a steel bar reinforcement method, can automatically detect collisions between reinforcing steel bars in various weak wall conditions, achieving automatic avoidance, reducing errors caused by human intervention, and minimizing unreasonable designs.

[0112] In related technologies, the statistics of reinforcing bars and other reinforcing bars are all done manually, which is inefficient and not conducive to material preparation and statistics. However, the reinforcing bar strengthening method of this application can automatically perform the statistics of reinforcing bar materials, reduce the workload of statistics, and thus reduce the workload of manual processing.

[0113] According to an embodiment of the present invention, in a second aspect, a reinforcement processing device for weak parts of precast components is also provided, for performing the above-described reinforcement processing method. The reinforcement processing device includes: an acquisition module, a first judgment module, a second judgment module, and a layout information generation module. The acquisition module is used to acquire part information of the precast component 1; the first judgment module is used to determine whether the precast component 1 has weak parts based on the part information; the second judgment module is used to determine whether the precast component 1 has weak parts and to determine whether to arrange reinforcing ribs 107 based on the degree of weakening of the precast component 1 by the weak parts; the layout information generation module is used to determine whether to arrange reinforcing ribs 107 and to generate layout information of reinforcing ribs 107 based on the arrangement rules of reinforcing ribs 107 and the position information of the weak parts on the precast component 1.

[0114] The enhancement processing device provided in this embodiment of the invention is used to execute the enhancement processing method provided in the above embodiment. Its implementation method and principle are the same. For details, please refer to the relevant description of the above method embodiment, which will not be repeated here.

[0115] According to an embodiment of the present invention, in a third aspect, a reinforcement system for weak parts of precast components is also provided, comprising: at least one processor; a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by a processor, the instructions being executed by the at least one processor to cause the at least one processor to perform the reinforcement method described above.

[0116] In this embodiment, the processor can be a central processing unit (CPU). The processor can also be other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, or combinations of the above types of chips.

[0117] In this embodiment, the memory, as a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store non-transitory software programs, non-transitory computer-executable programs, and modules, such as the program instructions / modules corresponding to the enhanced processing method in this embodiment. The processor executes various functional applications and data processing by running the non-transitory software programs, instructions, and modules stored in the memory, thereby implementing the enhanced processing method in the following method embodiments.

[0118] The memory may include a program storage area and a data storage area. The program storage area may store the operating system and applications required for at least one function; the data storage area may store data created by the processor, etc. Furthermore, the memory may include high-speed random access memory and non-transitory memory, such as at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other non-transitory solid-state storage device. In some embodiments, the memory may optionally include memory remotely located relative to the processor, which can be connected to the processor via a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the Internet, corporate intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

[0119] According to an embodiment of the present invention, in a fourth aspect, a computer-readable storage medium is also provided, which stores computer instructions for causing a computer to perform the enhanced processing method described above. The storage medium may be a magnetic disk, optical disk, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), flash memory, hard disk drive (HDD), or solid-state drive (SSD), etc.; the storage medium may also include combinations of the above-mentioned types of memory.

[0120] Although embodiments of the invention have been described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art can make various modifications and variations without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and such modifications and variations all fall within the scope defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for strengthening weak parts of precast components, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Obtain part information for prefabricated components; Based on the part information, determine whether the prefabricated component has any weak points; If a weak part is identified in the precast component, a decision is made on whether to arrange reinforcing ribs based on the degree to which the weak part weakens the precast component. Specifically, if the weak part is an opening inside the precast component, the size of the opening determines whether to arrange the reinforcing ribs; if the weak part is a cut at the edge of the precast component, the reinforcing ribs are arranged; if the weak part is an embedded part, the parameter information of the embedded part determines whether to arrange the reinforcing ribs. The arrangement of the reinforcing ribs is determined, and the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs is generated according to the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs and the position information of the weak part on the precast component. When the weak part is the embedded part, the form of the reference datum is determined according to the parameter information of the weak part. The form of the reference datum includes a reference line and a reference box. The reference line is set at the upper edge of the embedded part, and the length of the reference line extends 30-50mm beyond the edge of the embedded part. The reference box refers to the smallest rectangle that can cover or surround the embedded part. The coordinate information of the reinforcing ribs is generated according to the coordinate information of the reference datum and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs.

2. The enhancement treatment method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of determining the arrangement of the reinforcing ribs and generating the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs based on the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs and the position information of the weak part on the precast component includes: A three-dimensional coordinate system is established with a point on the prefabricated component as the origin; Determine whether to set a reference benchmark based on the parameter information of the weak part; The reference datum is determined and set, and the coordinate information of the reinforcing rib is generated according to the coordinate information of the reference datum and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing rib. Without setting a reference benchmark, the coordinate information of the reinforcing ribs is generated based on the coordinate information of the weak part and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs.

3. The enhancement treatment method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The enhancement processing method further includes the following steps: Without setting a reference datum, several coordinate points of the weak part are calculated based on the part information to obtain the coordinate information of the weak part; The reference datum is determined and set. Based on the part information and the arrangement rules of the reference datum, several coordinate points of the reference datum are calculated to obtain the coordinate information of the reference datum.

4. The enhancement treatment method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The steps for determining whether to install the reinforcing rib based on the size of the opening include: When the opening is polygonal, determine whether the length of at least one side of the opening is greater than 800mm; If the length of at least one side of the opening is greater than or equal to 800 mm, then a reinforcing hidden beam shall be arranged accordingly. If the length of each side of the opening is less than 800mm, determine whether the length of each side of the opening is greater than 300mm; Determine that the length of each side of the opening is greater than 300mm, and then determine the arrangement of the reinforcing ribs; If the length of each side of the opening is less than or equal to 300 mm, then no reinforcing ribs will be installed. When the opening is circular, determine whether the diameter of the opening is greater than or equal to 800 mm; Determine that the diameter of the opening is greater than or equal to 800 mm, and then determine to arrange a hidden beam for reinforcement; If the diameter of the opening is determined to be less than 800 mm, then determine whether the diameter of the opening is greater than 300 mm. Determine that the diameter of the opening is greater than 300mm, and then determine the arrangement of the reinforcing ribs; If the diameter of the opening is determined to be less than or equal to 300 mm, then it is determined whether the reinforcing ribs are to be installed or not.

5. The strengthening treatment method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that, The enhancement processing method further includes the following steps: Determine whether the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs collides with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component; If the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs is determined to collide with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component, the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs is adjusted according to the adjustment rules of the reinforcing ribs. After adjustment, it is determined whether the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs collides with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component, until the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs does not collide with the arrangement information of the distributed reinforcing bars of the precast component.

6. The strengthening treatment method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that, The enhancement processing method further includes the following steps: Using the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs, the pre-set parameter information of the reinforcing ribs, and the part information of the precast component, the attribute information of all the reinforcing bars of the precast component is statistically analyzed, and an attribute information table of all the reinforcing bars of the precast component is generated.

7. A device for reinforcing weak parts of precast components, characterized in that, The enhancement processing apparatus is used to perform the enhancement processing method according to claim 1, the enhancement processing device comprising: The acquisition module is used to acquire part information of prefabricated components; The first judgment module is used to determine whether the prefabricated component has a weak part based on the part information; The second judgment module is used to determine whether the precast component has a weak part, and to determine whether to arrange a reinforcing rib based on the degree of weakening of the precast component by the weak part; wherein, when the weak part is an opening set inside the precast component, the size of the opening determines whether to arrange the reinforcing rib; when the weak part is a cut on the edge of the precast component, the reinforcing rib is determined to be arranged; when the weak part is an embedded part, the parameter information of the embedded part determines whether to arrange the reinforcing rib. The arrangement information generation module is used to determine the arrangement of the reinforcing ribs, and generate the arrangement information of the reinforcing ribs according to the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs and the position information of the weak part on the precast component; wherein, when the weak part is the embedded part, the form of the reference datum is determined according to the parameter information of the weak part, the form of the reference datum includes a reference line and a reference box, the reference line is set at the upper edge of the embedded part, the length of the reference line extends 30-50mm beyond the edge of the embedded part, and the reference box refers to the smallest rectangle that can cover or surround the embedded part, and the coordinate information of the reinforcing ribs is generated according to the coordinate information of the reference datum and the arrangement rules of the reinforcing ribs.

8. A reinforcement system for weak parts of precast components, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; A memory that is communicatively connected to the at least one processor; The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor, which are executed by the at least one processor to cause the at least one processor to perform the enhanced processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions for causing a computer to perform the enhanced processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images