Digital implementation method and system for automatic layout of electrical control cabinet

Abstract

The present application relates to a kind of digital implementation method and system of automatic layout of electrical control cabinet, the method for the system to be implemented includes the following steps: S1, input electrical control cabinet size, according to the preliminary suggested value estimation of the width X and height Y of mounting plate according to electrical control cabinet size;S2, wire slot estimation;S3, to be arranged component classification;S4, mounting plate size estimation;S5, mounting plate region segmentation;S6, component automatic arrangement;S7, automatic wiring;S8, rationality analysis.The present application focuses on being able to according to sound 3D component library, the standard of electrical design component arrangement, applied in electrical design 3D component automatic layout, aims at being able to reduce the dependence of design engineer for personal experience, standardization design is integrated in software, improves design efficiency.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of electrical control cabinet manufacturing, and in particular to a digital implementation method and system for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, 3D layout software for electrical cabinets can only simulate and define the layout area of ​​components, and cannot directly guide the placement of the designed components. For components designed by engineers, experienced engineers still need to install the components according to the design standards of the electrical control cabinet and their practical experience.

[0003] This paper presents a digital design for automated electrical cabinet wiring based on Creo secondary development. Taking automated electrical cabinet wiring as the research object, it analyzes the basic principles of automated electrical cabinet wiring and conducts research on aspects such as wiring information acquisition, area division, wiring area delineation, and path planning. A digital design for automated electrical cabinet wiring is then implemented based on Creo secondary development technology. Practice has proven that automated electrical wiring achieves automation and digitization, improving wiring efficiency. However, no solution is provided for the automated placement and installation of components.

[0004] Currently, mainstream electrical cabinet 3D layout software, such as Eplan Pro Panel and Eplan Harness proD, has relatively complete automated model generation for automatic routing. Utilizing relevant electrical engineering information to enhance digital twins, it can already guide actual production. However, there is no automatic generation solution for component placement. Engineers still need to place each 3D model onto the mounting layout board one by one. Although there is a quick placement function, this function can only accurately locate the model's coordinates on the mounting board; the actual placement still relies on the engineer's experience, and batch one-click automatic placement generation is not yet possible. Automatic layout generation primarily addresses the issue of component placement. Different component placements affect many other aspects, such as EMC, heat dissipation, cable tray capacity, and wire harness length. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The first objective of this invention is to provide a digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets. This method focuses on applying the standard for the arrangement of electrical design components to the automatic layout of 3D electrical design components based on a comprehensive 3D component library. The aim is to reduce the reliance of design engineers on personal experience, integrate standardized designs into the software, and improve design efficiency.

[0006] The technical solution to achieve the first objective of this invention is: a digital implementation method for the automatic layout of electrical control cabinets in this invention; comprising the following steps:

[0007] S1. Input the dimensions of the electrical control cabinet, and estimate the preliminary suggested values ​​of the width X and height Y of the mounting plate based on the dimensions of the electrical control cabinet;

[0008] S2. Cable Tray Estimation: Estimate the specifications and length of the cable trays to obtain an estimated value. The estimated value is H*W*L, where H is the height of the cable tray, W is the width of the cable tray, and L is the length of the cable tray.

[0009] The cable tray specifications are estimated based on a tray fill factor α ≤ 75%, the number of conductors n, the number of conductors Sn and the conductor cross-sectional area S in each tray, and the following steps combined with the cable tray database to calculate and select the cable tray specification H*W:

[0010] A. According to the formula for calculating the slot fill factor α=n*Sn*S / An, and the slot fill factor α≤75%, we get An≥n*Sn*S* / 0.75; where An is the area of ​​the cable tray, and the unit of the conductor cross-sectional area S is square millimeters.

[0011] B. Since the area of ​​the cable tray An = H*W, and the width W and height H of the cable tray are a fixed combination in the cable tray database, the cable tray specification H*W that matches the width W and height H of the cable tray to be selected is calculated.

[0012] The estimated length of the cable tray must satisfy the conditions L≤X, L≤Y;

[0013] S3. Classification of Components to be Arranged: First, classify the components according to their categories, with components of the same type having the same name, and numbering them in ascending order according to their appearance in the schematic diagram; then, extract the mounting methods of the components from the component database; the mounting methods include, but are not limited to, rail mounting, hole-mounted mounting, or panel mounting; then, extract the component mounting data from the component database; the component mounting data includes, but is not limited to, heat dissipation mounting requirements, mounting spacing requirements, the maximum width Wmax used to limit the spacing between adjacent vertical wiring slots, and the maximum length Lmax used to limit the spacing between adjacent horizontal wiring slots; the above steps complete the preliminary classification of the components to be arranged.

[0014] S4. Mounting plate size estimation: Determine the size of the mounting plate based on the wiring trough specifications from steps S1 to S3 and the preliminary classification results of the components to be arranged.

[0015] S5. Mounting plate area segmentation: Based on the dimensions of the mounting plate determined in step S4, and the preliminary classification of the components to be arranged and the functional blocks to be formed in step S3, output the area segmentation result of the mounting plate and the specific number of wiring channels.

[0016] S6. Automatic component layout: Input the layout rules and / or the weight relationship of the layout principles to calculate and form a component layout scheme;

[0017] S7. Automatic routing: Based on the component layout plan and by calling the routing database data, automatic routing is performed to form the final solution;

[0018] S8. Rationality Analysis: Perform a rationality analysis on the final solution. The rationality analysis calculation includes, but is not limited to, slot fill factor α and / or component mounting plate occupancy rate β. If the slot fill factor α ≤ 75% is not met, the wiring trough specifications calculated in step S2 will be recalculated and adjusted. If the component mounting plate occupancy rate β is not met, the mounting plate dimensions in step S4 will be recalculated and adjusted.

[0019] Furthermore, in step S1 above, the dimensions of the electrical control cabinet are width Xa and height Ya; based on recommended ratio values ​​k1 and k2, the upper limit values ​​of the width Xlen1 and height Ylen1 of the mounting plate are set, where Xlen1 = Xa * k1, Ylen1 = Ya * k2; where k1 and k2 are both greater than or equal to c and less than or equal to d, c ≥ 50%, d ≤ 90%; simultaneously, the width X and height Y of the mounting plate satisfy the following conditions:

[0020] Xlen2≤X≤Xlen1;

[0021] Ylen2≤Y≤Ylen1;

[0022] Where Xlen2 is the maximum width of components that are recommended to be placed in the same row; Ylen2 is the maximum height of components in each row.

[0023] Furthermore, the maximum height of each row of components is equal to the maximum reserved width of the component, the height of the ESD reserved safety area, and the height of the cable tray.

[0024] Furthermore, in step S2 above, the following rules are added when estimating the wiring channels: layout space, heat dissipation, ambient temperature, and wiring channel tooth pitch.

[0025] Furthermore, the component installation data in step S3 above also includes high and low voltage component layout restrictions, EMC requirements, and inlet line requirements.

[0026] Furthermore, the arrangement rules in step S6 above are as follows: it is better to arrange similar components neatly, to arrange components with similar widths, to arrange components in the same order as the schematic diagram, and to arrange components with a low component mounting board occupancy rate β.

[0027] The component mounting plate occupancy rate β = S_total / S_bottom; where S_total = ∑S1 + S2, S1 is the total bottom area of ​​the wiring trough, and S2 is the total bottom area of ​​the component mounting plate; where S_bottom = X * Y.

[0028] Furthermore, the weighting relationships of the arrangement principles in step S6 above are established as follows:

[0029] The weight of each attribute is adjusted according to requirements. Attributes include: a) neat arrangement of similar components is preferred; b) similar and consistent width is preferred; c) consistent arrangement order in the schematic diagram is preferred; d) low component mounting board occupancy rate (β) is preferred. The priority of a, b, c, and d is set according to design requirements, and the weights are set from heavy to light according to the priority. When calculating the component layout scheme, the attribute with the highest priority is satisfied first, and the attribute with the lowest priority is satisfied last.

[0030] Furthermore, in step S6 above, a recommended component layout scheme is formed based on the built-in weight relationship.

[0031] Furthermore, step S7 above performs automatic routing according to the following routing rules: power and signal lines are routed separately and / or the paths are short and / or wire bend radius compensation is performed.

[0032] Furthermore, in step S8 above, the rationality analysis and calculation of the component mounting board occupancy rate β are performed in the following manner:

[0033] The component mounting plate occupancy rate β = Stotal / Sbottom; where Stotal = ∑S1 + S2, S1 is the total bottom area of ​​the wiring trough, S2 is the total bottom area of ​​the component mounting plate; where Sbottom = X * Y;

[0034] If β < 50%, the dimensions of the mounting plate in step S4 will be recalculated and adjusted.

[0035] Furthermore, in step S8 above, the rationality analysis and calculation of the EMC interference value are performed in the following manner:

[0036] The system calls upon empirical data from the database, which includes, but is not limited to, the component's own EMC data, installation space requirements, and preliminary layout simulation suggestions for magnetic field interference. If a warning is issued, it is recommended to rearrange the components or further isolate components with high EMC interference.

[0037] The second objective of this invention is to provide an automatic layout system for electrical control cabinets, which can effectively improve the design efficiency of electrical control cabinets through the above-mentioned method.

[0038] The technical solution to achieve the second objective of the present invention is: the automatic layout system for electrical control cabinets in the present invention for implementing the above-mentioned digital implementation method includes a wiring trough estimation module for implementing step S2, a component classification module for implementing step S3, a mounting plate size estimation module for implementing step S4, a mounting plate area segmentation module for implementing step S5, an automatic component arrangement module for implementing step S6, an automatic wiring module for implementing step S7, and a rationality analysis module for implementing step S8.

[0039] The present invention has positive effects: (1) The present invention focuses on applying the standard of electrical design component layout to the automatic layout of electrical design 3D components based on a sound 3D component library. It aims to reduce the reliance of design engineers on personal experience, integrate standardized design into the software, and improve design efficiency.

[0040] (2) This invention integrates pre-design into planning confirmation. Due to the consistency of data, the rationality of the design can be greatly improved, and the manual intervention during actual placement can be greatly reduced, thereby achieving the goal of reducing costs and improving project quality. Attached Figure Description

[0041] To make the content of this invention easier to understand, the invention will be further described in detail below with reference to specific embodiments and accompanying drawings, wherein...

[0042] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0043] See Figure 1 The present invention provides a digital implementation method for the automatic layout of electrical control cabinets, comprising the following steps:

[0044] S1. Input the dimensions of the electrical control cabinet, and estimate the preliminary suggested values ​​of the width X and height Y of the mounting plate based on the dimensions of the electrical control cabinet;

[0045] S2. Cable Tray Estimation: Estimate the specifications and length of the cable trays to obtain an estimated value. The estimated value is H*W*L, where H is the height of the cable tray, W is the width of the cable tray, and L is the length of the cable tray.

[0046] The cable tray specifications are estimated based on a tray fill factor α ≤ 75%, the number of conductors n, the number of conductors Sn and the conductor cross-sectional area S in each tray, and the following steps combined with the cable tray database to calculate and select the cable tray specification H*W:

[0047] A. According to the formula for calculating the slot fill factor α=n*Sn*S / An, and the slot fill factor α≤75%, we get An≥n*Sn*S* / 0.75; where An is the area of ​​the cable tray, and the unit of the conductor cross-sectional area S is square millimeters.

[0048] B. Since the area of ​​the cable tray An = H*W, and the width W and height H of the cable tray are a fixed combination in the cable tray database, the cable tray specification H*W that matches the width W and height H of the cable tray to be selected is calculated.

[0049] The commonly used dimensions (H*W) for cable trays are as follows:

[0050] 25*25, 35*25, 35*35

[0051] 40*25, 40*40, 40*60

[0052] 45*25, 45*45, 45*65

[0053] 50*25, 50*30, 50*40, 50*50, 50*55, 50*60, 50*80, 50*100

[0054] 60*25, 60*40, 65*45, 65*65

[0055] 80*25, 80*35, 80*40, 80*45, 80*50, 80*55, 80*60, 80*80, 80*100, 80*120, 80*140.

[0056] The estimated length of the cable tray must satisfy the conditions L≤X, L≤Y;

[0057] S3. Classification of Components to be Arranged: First, classify the components according to their categories, with components of the same type having the same name, and numbering them in ascending order according to their appearance in the schematic diagram; then, extract the mounting methods of the components from the component database; the mounting methods include, but are not limited to, rail mounting, hole-mounted mounting, or panel mounting; then, extract the component mounting data from the component database; the component mounting data includes, but is not limited to, heat dissipation mounting requirements, mounting spacing requirements, the maximum width Wmax used to limit the spacing between adjacent vertical wiring slots, and the maximum length Lmax used to limit the spacing between adjacent horizontal wiring slots; the above steps complete the preliminary classification of the components to be arranged.

[0058] S4. Mounting plate size estimation: Determine the size of the mounting plate based on the wiring trough specifications from steps S1 to S3 and the preliminary classification results of the components to be arranged.

[0059] S5. Mounting plate area segmentation: Based on the dimensions of the mounting plate determined in step S4, and the preliminary classification of the components to be arranged and the functional blocks to be formed in step S3, output the area segmentation result of the mounting plate and the specific number of wiring channels.

[0060] S6. Automatic component layout: Input the layout rules and / or the weight relationship of the layout principles to calculate and form a component layout scheme;

[0061] S7. Automatic routing: Based on the component layout plan and by calling the routing database data, automatic routing is performed to form the final solution;

[0062] S8. Rationality Analysis: Perform a rationality analysis on the final solution. The rationality analysis calculation includes, but is not limited to, slot fill factor α and / or component mounting plate occupancy rate β. If the slot fill factor α ≤ 75% is not met, the wiring trough specifications calculated in step S2 will be recalculated and adjusted. If the component mounting plate occupancy rate β is not met, the mounting plate dimensions in step S4 will be recalculated and adjusted.

[0063] In step S1, the electrical control cabinet has dimensions of width Xa and height Ya. Based on recommended ratio values ​​k1 and k2, the upper limits for the width Xlen1 and height Ylen1 of the mounting plate are set, where Xlen1 = Xa * k1 and Ylen1 = Ya * k2. Both k1 and k2 are greater than or equal to c and less than or equal to d, where c ≥ 50% and d ≤ 90%. Simultaneously, the width X and height Y of the mounting plate must satisfy the following conditions:

[0064] Xlen2≤X≤Xlen1;

[0065] Ylen2≤Y≤Ylen1;

[0066] Where Xlen2 is the maximum width of components that are recommended to be placed in the same row; Ylen2 is the maximum height of components in each row.

[0067] The maximum height of each row of components is equal to the maximum reserved width of the components, the height of the ESD reserved safety area, and the height of the cable tray.

[0068] In step S2, when estimating the wiring channel, the following rules are also added: layout space, heat dissipation, ambient temperature, and wiring channel tooth pitch.

[0069] The component installation data in step S3 also includes high and low voltage component layout restrictions, EMC requirements, and inlet line requirements.

[0070] The arrangement rules in step S6 are as follows: it is better to arrange similar components neatly, to arrange components with similar widths, to arrange components in the same order as the schematic diagram, and to have a low component mounting board occupancy rate β.

[0071] The component mounting plate occupancy rate β = S_total / S_bottom; where S_total = ∑S1 + S2, S1 is the total bottom area of ​​the wiring trough, and S2 is the total bottom area of ​​the component mounting plate; where S_bottom = X * Y.

[0072] Furthermore, the weighting relationships of the arrangement principles in step S6 above are established as follows:

[0073] The weight of each attribute is adjusted according to requirements. Attributes include: a) neat arrangement of similar components is preferred; b) similar and consistent width is preferred; c) consistent arrangement order in the schematic diagram is preferred; d) low component mounting board occupancy rate (β) is preferred. The priority of a, b, c, and d is set according to design requirements, and the weights are set from heavy to light according to the priority. When calculating the component layout scheme, the attribute with the highest priority is satisfied first, and the attribute with the lowest priority is satisfied last.

[0074] In step S6, a recommended component layout scheme is formed based on the built-in weight relationship.

[0075] Step S7 performs automatic routing according to the following routing rules: power and signal lines are routed separately and / or the paths are short and / or wire bend radius compensation is performed.

[0076] In step S8, the reasonableness analysis and calculation of the component mounting board occupancy rate β are performed in the following manner:

[0077] The component mounting plate occupancy rate β = Stotal / Sbottom; where Stotal = ∑S1 + S2, S1 is the total bottom area of ​​the wiring trough, S2 is the total bottom area of ​​the component mounting plate; where Sbottom = X * Y;

[0078] If β < 50%, the dimensions of the mounting plate in step S4 are recalculated and adjusted.

[0079] In step S8, the EMC interference value is also analyzed and calculated for reasonableness in the following manner:

[0080] The system calls upon empirical data from the database, which includes, but is not limited to, the component's own EMC data, installation space requirements, and preliminary layout simulation suggestions for magnetic field interference. If a warning is issued, it is recommended to rearrange the components or further isolate components with high EMC interference.

[0081] The automatic layout system for electrical control cabinets in this invention, used to implement the above-mentioned digital implementation method, includes a wiring trough estimation module for implementing step S2, a component classification module for implementing step S3, a mounting plate size estimation module for implementing step S4, a mounting plate area segmentation module for implementing step S5, an automatic component arrangement module for implementing step S6, an automatic wiring module for implementing step S7, and a rationality analysis module for implementing step S8.

[0082] The specific embodiments described above further illustrate the purpose, technical solution, and beneficial effects of the present invention. It should be understood that the above descriptions are merely specific embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets; characterized in that... Includes the following steps: S1. Input the dimensions of the electrical control cabinet, and estimate the preliminary suggested values ​​of the width X and height Y of the mounting plate based on the dimensions of the electrical control cabinet; S2. Cable Tray Estimation: Estimate the specifications and length of the cable trays to obtain an estimated value. The estimated value is H*W*L, where H is the height of the cable tray, W is the width of the cable tray, and L is the length of the cable tray. The cable tray specifications are estimated based on a tray fill factor α ≤ 75%, the number of wires n, the number of wires Sn and the cross-sectional area S in each tray, and the following steps combined with the cable tray database to calculate and select the cable tray specifications H*W: A. According to the formula for calculating the slot fill factor α=n*Sn*S / An, and the slot fill factor α≤75%, we get An≥n*Sn*S* / 0.75; where An is the area of ​​the cable tray, and the unit of the conductor cross-sectional area S is square millimeters. B. Since the area of ​​the cable tray An = H*W, and the width W and height H of the cable tray are a fixed combination in the cable tray database, the cable tray specification H*W that matches the width W and height H of the cable tray to be selected is calculated. The estimated length of the cable tray must satisfy the conditions L≤X, L≤Y; S3. Classification of Components to be Arranged: First, classify the components according to their categories, with components of the same type having the same name, and numbering them in ascending order according to their appearance in the schematic diagram; then, extract the mounting method of the components from the component database; the mounting method is rail mounting, hole-mounted mounting, or panel mounting; then, extract the component mounting data from the component database; the component mounting data includes heat dissipation mounting requirements, mounting spacing requirements, the maximum width Wmax used to limit the spacing between adjacent vertical wiring slots, and the maximum length Lmax used to limit the spacing between adjacent horizontal wiring slots; the above steps complete the preliminary classification of the components to be arranged. S4. Mounting plate size estimation: Determine the size of the mounting plate based on the wiring trough specifications from steps S1 to S3 and the preliminary classification results of the components to be arranged. S5. Mounting plate area segmentation: Based on the dimensions of the mounting plate determined in step S4, and the preliminary classification of the components to be arranged and the functional blocks to be formed in step S3, output the area segmentation result of the mounting plate and the specific number of wiring channels. S6. Automatic component layout: Input the layout rules and / or the weight relationship of the layout principles to calculate and form a component layout scheme; S7. Automatic routing: Based on the component layout plan and by calling the routing database, automatic routing is performed to form the final solution. S8. Rationality Analysis: Perform a rationality analysis on the final solution. The rationality analysis is calculated as slot fill rate α and / or component mounting plate occupancy rate β. If the slot fill rate α ≤ 75% is not met, the wiring trough specifications calculated in step S2 are recalculated and adjusted. If the component mounting plate occupancy rate β is not met, the mounting plate dimensions in step S4 are recalculated and adjusted. The arrangement rules in step S6 are as follows: it is better to arrange similar components neatly, to arrange components with similar widths, to arrange components in the same order as the schematic diagram, and to have a low component mounting board occupancy rate β. The component mounting plate occupancy rate β = S_total / S_bottom; where S_total = ∑S1 + S2, S1 is the total bottom area of ​​the wiring trough, S2 is the total bottom area of ​​the component mounting plate; where S_bottom = X * Y; The weighting relationship of the arrangement principles in step S6 is established as follows: The weight of each attribute is adjusted according to requirements. Attributes include: a) neat arrangement of similar components is preferred; b) similar and consistent width is preferred; c) consistent arrangement order in the schematic diagram is preferred; d) low component mounting board occupancy rate (β) is preferred. The priority of a, b, c, and d is set according to design requirements, and the weights are set from heavy to light according to the priority. When calculating the component layout scheme, the attribute with the highest priority is satisfied first, and the attribute with the lowest priority is satisfied last.

2. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S1, the electrical control cabinet has dimensions of width Xa and height Ya. Based on recommended ratio values ​​k1 and k2, the upper limits for the width Xlen1 and height Ylen1 of the mounting plate are set, where Xlen1 = Xa * k1 and Ylen1 = Ya * k2. Both k1 and k2 are greater than or equal to c and less than or equal to d, where c ≥ 50% and d ≤ 90%. Simultaneously, the width X and height Y of the mounting plate must satisfy the following conditions: Xlen2≤X≤Xlen1; Ylen2≤Y≤Ylen1; Where Xlen2 is the maximum width of components that are recommended to be placed in the same row; Ylen2 is the maximum height of components in each row.

3. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 2, characterized in that: The maximum height of each row of components is equal to the maximum reserved width of the components, the height of the ESD reserved safety area, and the height of the cable tray.

4. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S2, when estimating the wiring channel, the following rules are also added: layout space, heat dissipation, ambient temperature, and wiring channel tooth pitch.

5. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: The component installation data in step S3 also includes high and low voltage component layout restrictions, EMC requirements, and inlet line requirements.

6. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: The weighting relationship of the arrangement principles in step S6 is established as follows: The weight of each attribute is adjusted according to requirements. Attributes include: a) neat arrangement of similar components is preferred; b) similar and consistent width is preferred; c) consistent arrangement order in the schematic diagram is preferred; d) low component mounting board occupancy rate (β) is preferred. The priority of a, b, c, and d is set according to design requirements, and the weights are set from heavy to light according to the priority. When calculating the component layout scheme, the attribute with the highest priority is satisfied first, and the attribute with the lowest priority is satisfied last.

7. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S6, a recommended component layout scheme is formed based on the built-in weight relationship.

8. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: Step S7 performs automatic routing according to the following routing rules: power and signal lines are routed separately and / or the paths are short and / or wire bend radius compensation is performed.

9. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S8, the reasonableness analysis and calculation of the component mounting board occupancy rate β are performed in the following manner: The component mounting plate occupancy rate β = Stotal / Sbottom; where Stotal = ∑S1 + S2, S1 is the total bottom area of ​​the wiring trough, and S2 is the total bottom area of ​​the component mounting plate. Where S_base = X * Y; If β < 50%, the dimensions of the mounting plate in step S4 are recalculated and adjusted.

10. The digital implementation method for automatic layout of electrical control cabinets according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S8, the rationality analysis and calculation of the EMC interference value are also performed in the following manner: The system retrieves empirical data from the database, which includes the component's built-in EMC data, installation space requirements, and preliminary layout simulation suggestions for magnetic field interference. If a warning is issued, it is recommended to rearrange the components or further isolate components with high EMC interference.

11. An automatic layout system for electrical control cabinets for implementing the digital implementation method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, characterized in that: It includes a wiring trough estimation module for implementing step S2, a component classification module for implementing step S3, a mounting plate size estimation module for implementing step S4, a mounting plate area segmentation module for implementing step S5, an automatic component arrangement module for implementing step S6, an automatic wiring module for implementing step S7, and a rationality analysis module for implementing step S8.

Images