An automated first article inspection execution method and system
By using automated first article inspection methods and systems, the problems of incomplete execution, recording errors, and specification deviations in first article inspection during packaging substrate manufacturing have been solved, achieving automation, accuracy, and efficient operation of the production line for first article inspection.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- THINKTRANS SEMICON TECH LTD
- Filing Date
- 2025-12-30
- Publication Date
- 2026-06-12
AI Technical Summary
Existing technologies in packaging substrate manufacturing suffer from problems such as the inability to ensure 100% execution of first-piece inspection, frequent record errors, and unavoidable specification deviations, resulting in low production quality and efficiency.
An automated first-article inspection method is adopted. By generating inspection documents and comparing them with standard specifications, the automatic triggering and result entry of the first-article inspection samples are ensured. Combined with event-based and periodic triggering conditions, the production line is suspended until the inspection is qualified. Digital identification is used to bind samples and documents, and multiple entry methods and alarm mechanisms are provided.
It has automated and standardized the first-piece inspection, ensuring the accuracy of inspection results, avoiding human error, improving production quality and efficiency, timely detecting and handling abnormalities, and preventing potential quality risks.
Smart Images
Figure CN122196565A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of packaging substrate manufacturing technology, and in particular to an automated first article inspection method and system. Background Technology
[0002] In the packaging substrate manufacturing industry, existing technologies require manual identification of product QR codes to record information for first-piece inspection and related information management. A paperless IT platform is then used to verify whether there are any abnormalities in the recorded content, and inspection documents are manually created based on work orders to start the production of the first-piece product.
[0003] The above-mentioned method for generating inspection documents has significant shortcomings: it cannot ensure that the first piece inspection is performed 100%, and it is easily skipped due to tight production schedules or personnel negligence; it cannot ensure that the inspection process is recorded 100% correctly, as manual entry is prone to errors or omissions, and the IT platform can only perform basic anomaly identification, making it difficult to solve substantive recording problems; it cannot ensure that the specifications of the first piece inspection are 100% correct, and when manually retrieving and matching specifications, it is easy to cause specification deviations due to outdated standards or incorrect parameter selection. Summary of the Invention
[0004] The main objective of this invention is to provide an automated first-article inspection execution method and system to ensure the automatic triggering of first-article inspection tasks and the automatic generation of inspection documents, thereby improving production quality and efficiency.
[0005] The technical solution adopted in this invention is: an automated first-article inspection execution method, comprising: After the first piece inspection sample is produced, production is suspended. An inspection document is generated based on the standard specification table of the first piece inspection sample, and its qualification is determined. The first piece inspection sample is the first sample produced after the preset first piece inspection trigger conditions are met. The standard specification table is generated based on the target design parameters of the first piece inspection sample. If the generated inspection report is qualified, the first piece of the inspection sample is inspected according to the inspection report; the inspection results are entered into the inspection report, and the first piece of the inspection sample is judged to be qualified by comparing it with the standard specification table; if qualified, mass production is started; otherwise, an alarm is set and the production line corresponding to the first piece of the inspection sample is locked for anomaly investigation until production is restarted. If the sample produced by the production line is judged to be qualified within the preset number of inspections, mass production is started. If no inspection document is generated or the generated inspection document is unqualified, the anomaly is investigated until the inspection document for the first inspection sample is generated and judged to be qualified.
[0006] According to the above technical solution, the first-piece inspection triggering conditions include event-type triggering conditions and periodic triggering conditions.
[0007] According to the above technical solution, the event-type triggering conditions include one or more of the following situations: the production equipment changes the mold, the batch of raw materials put into production changes, and the key process parameters in the product production process are adjusted. The periodic triggering conditions include one or more of the following: reaching a preset production time interval, or the quantity of batch production since the last inspection reaching a preset value.
[0008] According to the above technical solution, the target design parameters include dimensional tolerances and impedance ranges.
[0009] According to the above technical solution, the method for performing inspection on the first-piece inspection sample based on the inspection document includes: binding the generated qualified inspection document with the identity information of the digital identifier on the corresponding first-piece inspection sample that has been scanned and read; and calling the corresponding inspection document by scanning and reading the digital identifier during the inspection.
[0010] According to the above technical solution, the digital identifier is a QR code or a barcode.
[0011] According to the above technical solution, the methods for entering the results into the inspection document include: inputting the inspection results into the inspection document through a communication protocol; and inputting manually read inspection results into the inspection document through a human-computer interaction interface.
[0012] According to the above technical solution, the inspection document includes inspection items, standard values, and validity period; the validity period is set according to the process stability.
[0013] According to the above technical solution, the alarms include on-site audible and visual alarms and mobile terminal notification alarms.
[0014] Another aspect of the present invention provides an automated first-article inspection execution system, comprising: The standard specification table generation module is used to generate a standard specification table based on the target design parameters of the first article inspection sample. The first article inspection triggering and production control module is used to pause production after the first article inspection sample is produced; wherein, the first article inspection sample is the first sample produced after each preset first article inspection triggering condition is met. The inspection document generation and verification module is used to generate inspection documents based on the standard specifications of the first piece inspection sample and determine whether they are qualified. If the generated inspection document is qualified, it is input into the first piece inspection sample inspection and result comparison module. If no inspection document is generated or the generated inspection document is unqualified, production is terminated. The first-piece inspection sample inspection and result comparison module is used to perform inspection on the first-piece inspection sample according to the inspection document; enter the inspection result into the inspection document; and determine whether the first-piece inspection sample is qualified by comparing it with the standard specification table; if qualified, mass production is started; otherwise, an alarm is set and the production line corresponding to the first-piece inspection sample is locked for anomaly investigation until production is restarted. If the sample produced by the production line is judged to be qualified within the preset number of inspections, mass production is started.
[0015] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: It generates a standard specification table based on the current product target design parameters, ensuring accurate matching between inspection criteria and product design, thus avoiding incorrect inspections. Upon meeting the first-piece inspection trigger conditions, it automatically selects the first-piece inspection sample and pauses production, while simultaneously generating and verifying inspection documents. This ensures that the first-piece inspection is always performed and prevents the use of invalid documents for inspection. If the inspection document is qualified, the first-piece inspection sample is inspected and compared with the standard specification table. If qualified, mass production begins; if unqualified, an alarm is triggered and the production line is locked until the number of consecutive qualified samples exceeds a preset quantity, at which point production resumes. This standardizes the judgment of inspection results, promptly intercepts risks, and strengthens quality assurance after anomaly investigation. Furthermore, this invention directly terminates production if inspection documents are not generated or are unqualified, blocking risks from the very beginning of the process and preventing subsequent quality hazards.
[0016] Furthermore, this invention binds the qualified inspection document with the identity information of the digital identifier on the first inspection sample that has been scanned and read. Scanning the identifier allows the corresponding document to be retrieved, which simplifies the inspection document retrieval process and ensures the accurate correspondence between the inspection document and the sample to be inspected.
[0017] Furthermore, this invention provides two result entry methods: automatic input of communication protocols and manual input via human-computer interaction interface. This can be flexibly adapted to production environments without automatic testing equipment, ensuring efficient data entry in automatic testing scenarios and meeting the manual entry needs when there is no automatic equipment, without interrupting the inspection process.
[0018] Of course, any product implementing this invention does not necessarily need to achieve all of the advantages described above at the same time. Attached Figure Description
[0019] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.
[0020] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of the automated first article inspection execution method according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a flowchart of the automated first article inspection execution method of the present invention, which performs inspection and judgment on the first article inspection sample; Figure 3 This is a flowchart of the inspection document processing and master batch production control in the automated first article inspection execution method of this invention; Figure 4 This is a flowchart of the mapping process between inspection documents and product digital identifiers in the automated first-article inspection execution method of this invention. Figure 5 This is a structural diagram of the automated first-article inspection execution system according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 6 This is a structural diagram of another automated first-article inspection execution system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0021] Reference numerals: 401, Digital identification; 402, Barcode scanner; 403, Local area network; 404, Server; 405, Terminal device; 406, Mobile terminal. Detailed Implementation
[0022] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this invention clearer, the invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the invention.
[0023] It should be noted that the illustrations provided in the embodiments of the present invention are only schematic representations of the basic concept of the present invention. Therefore, the drawings only show the components related to the present invention and are not drawn according to the number, shape and size of the components in actual implementation. In actual implementation, the form, quantity and proportion of each component can be arbitrarily changed, and the layout of the components may also be more complex.
[0024] In this invention, it should also be noted that the terms "center," "upper," "lower," "left," "right," "vertical," "horizontal," "inner," and "outer," etc., indicate the orientation or positional relationship based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the accompanying drawings. They are used only for the convenience of describing this application and simplifying the description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, or be constructed and operated in a specific orientation. Therefore, they should not be construed as limitations on this application. Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used only for descriptive and distinguishing purposes and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.
[0025] Example 1 This embodiment provides an automated first-article inspection execution method, the process of which is as follows: Figure 1 As shown, the steps include: S1. For products currently being manufactured on the production line, generate a standard specification table based on their target design parameters. This standard specification table will serve as the core basis for subsequent first-article inspection, ensuring that the inspection items and parameter requirements are consistent with the actual design standards of the product.
[0026] Furthermore, the target design parameters for a product include its dimensional tolerances and impedance range. These parameters are core indicators of product performance and quality, directly determining the key dimensions of inspection and preventing the omission of crucial quality control points.
[0027] S2. The first sample produced after meeting the first-piece inspection trigger conditions is designated as the first-piece inspection sample. Production is suspended after the first-piece inspection sample is produced. An inspection document is generated based on the standard specification table of the first-piece inspection sample to determine whether it is qualified.
[0028] Selecting the first sample after the trigger condition allows for precise capture of the first output after a change in production status, effectively verifying the stability of the changed production process. Pausing production avoids starting mass production before the first piece inspection is completed and quality is confirmed, mitigating batch quality risks from a process perspective. Verifying the conformity of inspection documents ensures that the documents contain complete inspection items, standard values, and other necessary information, preventing the inspection process from becoming invalid due to missing document information.
[0029] Furthermore, the first-article inspection triggering conditions include event-based triggering conditions and periodic triggering conditions; event-based triggering conditions are caused by changes in production resources or process settings; periodic triggering conditions are caused by changes in time or quantity conditions. Distinguishing between event-based and periodic triggering conditions is to comprehensively cover two types of scenarios requiring quality verification during the production process: sudden changes and regular periodic fluctuations, thus achieving full-scenario coverage of first-article inspection.
[0030] Furthermore, the event-based triggering conditions include: changing molds in production equipment, changing batches of raw materials used in production, and adjusting key process parameters during product manufacturing. The periodic triggering conditions include: reaching a preset production time interval, or the production quantity of products reaching a preset value since the last inspection. These events are all key change points in the production process that may affect product quality, and triggering the first-piece inspection can promptly verify the consistency of production after the changes.
[0031] Furthermore, the methods for determining whether an inspection document is qualified include: determining whether the quantity and specifications of the generated inspection items are consistent with those in the standard specification table; if they are consistent, it is considered qualified; otherwise, it is considered unqualified.
[0032] S3. If the generated inspection report is qualified, the first piece of the sample is inspected according to the inspection report. The inspection results are entered into the inspection report and compared with the standard specification table. The first piece of the sample is judged to be qualified according to preset rules. If it is qualified, batch production is started. If it is unqualified, an alarm is set and the production line is locked for anomaly investigation. This continues until production is restarted. If the samples produced by the production line are judged to be qualified within the preset number of inspections, batch production is started. Requiring multiple consecutive qualified samples before starting batch production avoids the randomness of a single qualified sample and ensures that the production process has returned to stability after anomaly investigation.
[0033] Furthermore, the method for performing inspection on the first-piece inspection sample based on the inspection document includes: binding the generated qualified inspection document with the identity information of the digital identifier on the first-piece inspection sample after scanning and reading; during inspection, the corresponding inspection document is retrieved by scanning and reading the digital identifier. By binding the document and the sample with the digital identifier, a unique match between the sample and the corresponding inspection requirements can be achieved, avoiding inspection errors caused by mismatch between the sample and the document.
[0034] Furthermore, the digital identifier is a QR code or a barcode. Choosing a QR code or barcode as the identifier allows for compatibility with common scanning devices in production sites, balancing the different scenario requirements of QR codes (which require more information storage) and barcodes (which require faster recognition).
[0035] Furthermore, the methods for entering results into inspection documents include: inputting inspection results into the inspection document via a communication protocol; and inputting manually read inspection results into the inspection document via a human-computer interaction interface. The compatibility of these two input methods can flexibly address different configurations on the production site, such as the deployment of automated testing equipment and manual testing alone, ensuring the smooth flow of inspection data entry.
[0036] Furthermore, the alarms include on-site audible and visual alarms and mobile notification alarms. On-site audible and visual alarms allow front-line production personnel to respond immediately, while mobile notification alarms ensure that management personnel are remotely and synchronously aware of anomalies, achieving multi-dimensional reach of anomaly information.
[0037] S4. If no inspection document is generated or the generated inspection document is unqualified, investigate the anomaly until the inspection document for the first inspection sample is generated and judged to be qualified. This operation intercepts risks at the starting point of the inspection process, preventing production from continuing without valid inspection evidence and avoiding the production of unqualified products in the future.
[0038] This embodiment also provides an automated first-article inspection execution system, the structure of which is as follows: Figure 5 As shown, it includes: The standard specification table generation module is used to generate standard specification tables for products currently being manufactured on the production line, based on their target design parameters. This module serves as the fundamental data source for the entire first article inspection process, and the generated standard specification tables must be aligned with the product design documents in real time to ensure the accuracy of the inspection basis.
[0039] The first article inspection triggering and production control module is used to designate the first sample produced after meeting the first article inspection triggering conditions as the first article inspection sample. After the production of the first article inspection sample is completed, production is paused. This module is responsible for the start and stop control functions of the production process. By accurately identifying the triggering conditions and controlling the production pause, it achieves the forced triggering of the first article inspection.
[0040] The inspection document generation and verification module generates inspection documents based on the standard specifications of the first-piece inspection sample and determines their compliance. If the generated inspection document is qualified, it is sent to the first-piece inspection sample inspection and result comparison module. If no inspection document is generated or the generated inspection document is unqualified, anomalies are investigated until the inspection document for the first-piece inspection sample is generated and deemed qualified. This module is the entry checkpoint of the inspection process, filtering out valid inspection documents through document verification to ensure that subsequent inspection work has a compliant basis for support.
[0041] The first-article inspection sample inspection and result comparison module is used to perform inspection on the first-article inspection sample according to the inspection document; the inspection results are entered into the inspection document, compared with the standard specification table, and judged as qualified according to preset rules; if qualified, mass production is started; if unqualified, an alarm is triggered and the production line is locked for anomaly investigation until production is restarted. If the samples produced by the production line are judged as qualified within a preset number of inspections, mass production is restarted. This module is the core execution unit of the first-article inspection, completing both the inspection operation and data entry, and achieving a closed loop of quality judgment and process control through result comparison and subsequent production control.
[0042] The methods for each module to perform its functions have been described in the automated first article inspection execution method of this embodiment, and will not be repeated here.
[0043] Example 2 Based on Example 1, this example provides another automated first-article inspection execution method, including the following steps: T1: Deploy hardware and build communication architecture.
[0044] Install industrial-grade QR code scanning equipment at key nodes in the production line, such as production equipment and inspection equipment.
[0045] T2: Configure software rules and build standard libraries.
[0046] T2-1: Dynamic binding of inspection standards: Synchronize product design parameters, such as setting dimensional tolerances to ±3μm, generate digital inspection specification tables, and build a standard library using all digital inspection specification tables.
[0047] T2-2: Version Control: When engineering design changes, the system automatically triggers the first-article inspection rule update and marks historical versions as traceable. Specifically, it determines whether there are engineering design changes based on preset trigger conditions.
[0048] T2-3: Set trigger conditions: Event-driven triggers: equipment mold / line change, raw material batch switching, process parameter adjustment.
[0049] Periodic trigger: Force the first article inspection to be started based on production quantity (e.g., every 500 pieces) or time interval (e.g., every 4 hours).
[0050] T3: Automatically generate inspection documents.
[0051] When the triggering conditions are met, the system performs the following operations: sends a pause command to the production equipment, intercepting the batch production process. It generates a unique inspection document, including: inspection items such as weld diameter and plate thickness; dynamic standard values retrieved in real-time from the standard library; and a validity period set according to process stability, such as valid for 30 minutes. After the equipment reads the first piece's QR code, it automatically associates the QR code ID with the inspection document and writes it to the blockchain evidence storage module.
[0052] T4: Automated data acquisition and result synchronization. The process is as follows: Figure 3 As shown: First, the QR code of the main batch mold is identified and parsed. Then, based on the parsing result, the inspection document and corresponding address identifier that match the current product identifier are obtained from the configuration library. Subsequently, the corresponding inspection document is generated based on the inspection document and address identifier. Then, the QR code of the first piece of inspection sample is identified and parsed. The parsed QR code information of the first piece is then filled into the corresponding product sample ID field in the inspection document to complete the information binding between the inspection document and the first piece of inspection sample. Finally, the first piece inspection result is entered.
[0053] T4-1: Inspection Execution: After reading the QR code on the board, the automatic inspection equipment performs the inspection according to the preset program, and the data is directly transmitted back to the system via a communication protocol. An automatic line width measurement device can be selected as the automatic inspection equipment. The process is as follows: Figure 4 As shown: First, establish the mapping relationship between inspection documents and product QR codes in advance. Then, traverse the unique address identifier segment in the historical inspection document library and determine whether the corresponding inspection document exists according to the aforementioned mapping relationship. If the inspection document exists, crawl the fields of the target document to generate a new inspection document. If the inspection document does not exist, issue a prompt indicating that the acquisition of the inspection document has failed.
[0054] T4-2: Manual assistance mode: If there is no automatic inspection equipment, after the operator scans the QR code, the HMI (Human-Machine Interface) interface automatically retrieves the inspection items and guides the operator to manually enter the results. That is, when the inspection or measurement equipment cannot perform automatic data reporting, a data export function can be developed for packaged manual upload, and the system automatically matches the data.
[0055] T4-3: Data synchronization: The system compares the inspection results with the standard values to generate a judgment conclusion on whether it is qualified. The result data is synchronized to the inspection document and pushed to the SPC (Statistical Process Control) analysis module.
[0056] T5: Perform anti-fooling verification and exception handling. The process is as Figure 4 shown: After the first-piece inspection document is generated, the system automatically locks the mother batch of products to restrict their feeding for production. Then, enter the inspection results of the first-piece inspection sample and judge whether the results are qualified. If the judgment result is qualified, the system automatically releases the production lock of the mother batch and starts the batch production process. If the judgment result is unqualified, the system automatically generates a second inspection document, and at the same time continuously maintains the production lock state of the mother batch and re-enters the inspection-related process. The mother batch is the overall product batch to be started for batch production to which the first-piece inspection sample belongs.
[0057] T5-1: Production locking mechanism: If the inspection document is not completed or judged to be unqualified, send a locking instruction to the equipment to prohibit the start of batch production. Further, when the equipment interaction ability is insufficient, a scheme of locking subsequent products if the inspection document is not completed can be adopted to ensure the effective implementation of the first-piece inspection of products.
[0058] T5-2: Trigger multi-level alarms.
[0059] Level 1: On-site audible and visual alarm; Level 2: Push alarm through the mobile terminal; Level 3: Email notification to the responsible engineer for alarm.
[0060] T5-3: Closed-loop processing logic.
[0061] If the first-piece inspection of the product is judged to be qualified: Automatically unlock the equipment, allow mass production, and record the inspection data in the traceability database. If the first-piece inspection of the product is judged to be unqualified: Automatically generate a second first-piece inspection task and repeat the execution until the inspection result is qualified, and the number of repeated executions does not exceed the preset number. If the inspection result is still not qualified after the repeated execution exceeds the preset number, the system will directly give an alarm prompt. In this embodiment, the preset number is 3 times.
[0062] This embodiment also provides an automated first-piece inspection execution device, as Figure 6 shown, including: A digital identifier 401, as the identifier carrier of the product, carrying the product identity information; A barcode scanner 402, used to identify and analyze the information of the digital identifier 401; A local area network 403, as the internal network of the system, used to connect and transmit data; A server 404, responsible for receiving the parsed barcode content and generating an inspection form based on this content; A terminal device 405, such as a computer, used to display the inspection form generated by the server; A mobile terminal 406, such as a mobile phone, used to display the inspection form generated by the server.
[0063] Among them, the barcode scanner 402 is used to scan and read and analyze the information of the digital identifier 401. A data transmission connection is established between the barcode scanner 402 and the server 404, and the barcode scanner 402 transmits the parsed identity information back to the server 404 through the local area network 403. Information push connections are established between the server 404 and the terminal device 405 and the mobile terminal 406 respectively, and the server 404 pushes the generated inspection documents to the terminal device 405 and the mobile terminal 406 through the local area network 403 for display.
[0064] In summary, the present invention provides an automated first-piece inspection execution method and system, which can ensure the triggering of the first-piece inspection task and the generation of inspection documents, and improve production quality and efficiency.
[0065] It should be noted that according to the needs of implementation, the various steps / components described in this application can be split into more steps / components, or two or more steps / components or parts of the operations of steps / components can be combined into new steps / components to achieve the purpose of the present invention.
[0066] In the above embodiments, the sizes of the serial numbers of each step do not mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation to the implementation process of the embodiments of this application.
[0067] It should be understood that those skilled in the art can make improvements or modifications based on the above description, and all such improvements and modifications should fall within the protection scope of the appended claims.
Claims
1. An automated first-article inspection execution method, characterized in that, include: After the first piece inspection sample is produced, production is suspended. An inspection document is generated based on the standard specification table of the first piece inspection sample, and its qualification is determined. The first piece inspection sample is the first sample produced after the preset first piece inspection trigger conditions are met. The standard specification table is generated based on the target design parameters of the first piece inspection sample. If the generated inspection report is qualified, the first piece of the inspection sample is inspected according to the inspection report; the inspection results are entered into the inspection report, and the first piece of the inspection sample is judged to be qualified by comparing it with the standard specification table; if qualified, mass production is started; otherwise, an alarm is set and the production line corresponding to the first piece of the inspection sample is locked for anomaly investigation until production is restarted. If the sample produced by the production line is judged to be qualified within the preset number of inspections, mass production is started. If no inspection document is generated or the generated inspection document is unqualified, the anomaly will be investigated until the inspection document for the first piece of inspection sample is generated and judged to be qualified.
2. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The first-article inspection triggering conditions include event-based triggering conditions and periodic triggering conditions.
3. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The event-type triggering conditions include one or more of the following situations: the production equipment changes the mold, the batch of raw materials put into production changes, and the key process parameters in the product production process are adjusted. The periodic triggering conditions include one or more of the following: reaching a preset production time interval, or the quantity of batch production since the last inspection reaching a preset value.
4. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The target design parameters include dimensional tolerances and impedance ranges.
5. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method for performing inspection on the first-piece inspection sample based on the inspection document includes: binding the generated qualified inspection document with the identity information of the digital identifier on the corresponding first-piece inspection sample that has been scanned and read; and calling the corresponding inspection document by scanning and reading the digital identifier during the inspection.
6. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The digital identifier is a QR code or a barcode.
7. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Methods for entering results into inspection documents include: inputting inspection results into inspection documents via communication protocols; and inputting manually read inspection results into inspection documents via human-computer interaction interfaces.
8. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The inspection report includes inspection items, standard values, and validity period; the validity period is set according to process stability.
9. The automated first-article inspection execution method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The alarms include on-site audible and visual alarms and mobile notification alarms.
10. An automated first-article inspection execution system, characterized in that, include: The standard specification table generation module is used to generate a standard specification table based on the target design parameters of the first article inspection sample. The first article inspection triggering and production control module is used to pause production after the first article inspection sample is produced; wherein, the first article inspection sample is the first sample produced after the preset first article inspection triggering conditions are met each time. The inspection document generation and verification module is used to generate inspection documents based on the standard specifications of the first piece inspection sample and determine whether they are qualified. If the generated inspection document is qualified, it is input into the first piece inspection sample inspection and result comparison module. If no inspection document is generated or the generated inspection document is unqualified, production is terminated. The first-piece inspection sample inspection and result comparison module is used to perform inspection on the first-piece inspection sample according to the inspection document; enter the inspection result into the inspection document; and determine whether the first-piece inspection sample is qualified by comparing it with the standard specification table; if qualified, mass production is started; otherwise, an alarm is set and the production line corresponding to the first-piece inspection sample is locked for anomaly investigation until production is restarted. If the sample produced by the production line is judged to be qualified within the preset number of inspections, mass production is started.