A county-level administrative area-oriented land and construction land integrated supervision method

Abstract

The application discloses a county-level administrative area-oriented land and construction land integrated supervision method, and particularly relates to the data processing technical field for land administrative supervision, and is used for solving the problem that different supervision systems cannot automatically eliminate conflicts when making contradictory judgments on the same land; by acquiring the state judgment results and time stamps of two dimensions of the same land and mapping to a unified time axis, the evidence node identifier and analysis conclusion are extracted and traced back to the data collection source identifier cross comparison to determine the logical mutual exclusion, and after the determination, the time coverage uniformity of the two-dimensional evidence chain is calculated, and the one with higher uniformity is taken as the conflict resolution reference direction; when the uniformity difference is less than a preset difference threshold, the dimension to which the evidence node with the time sequence in the front belongs is used as the reference direction, and the state judgment result under the reference direction is used to correct the other dimension and generate a unique comprehensive supervision state.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of data processing technology for land administration supervision, and in particular to an integrated supervision method for land and construction land in county-level administrative regions. Background Technology

[0002] In county-level land resource management, the supervision of construction land involves multiple business stages, including planning, land use approval, land supply, engineering construction, and completion verification. With the advancement of digitalization in territorial spatial governance, each business stage has gradually established independent information systems, such as land use approval systems, post-supply land supervision systems, and post-approval engineering planning permit supervision systems. These systems undertake supervisory functions at different stages. The post-supply land supervision system focuses on monitoring whether land parcels have commenced or been completed on schedule and whether they are idle. The post-approval engineering planning permit supervision system focuses on monitoring the implementation of construction drawings, the progress of main building construction, and the completion of supporting facilities. In actual operation, the same land parcel may be independently monitored and judged by multiple supervision systems simultaneously within the same time period. Each system generates its current supervisory status based on its own supervision rules, data sources, and judgment criteria.

[0003] However, since the judgment logic of different regulatory systems is independent and lacks a temporal correlation mechanism, when the post-land supply supervision dimension and the engineering construction supervision dimension produce inconsistent or even contradictory regulatory status judgments for the same land parcel, the existing technology cannot automatically resolve the above conflicts on a unified timeline and output a definitive comprehensive regulatory conclusion. This results in the status adjudication in the integrated supervision process relying on manual intervention, affecting the timeliness and accuracy of the regulatory loop. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This invention addresses the technical problems existing in the prior art by providing an integrated supervision method for land and construction land in county-level administrative regions.

[0005] The technical solution of the present invention to solve the above-mentioned technical problems is as follows:

[0006] A method for integrated supervision of land and construction land in county-level administrative regions includes:

[0007] S1: Obtain the status determination results and determination timestamps of the same land parcel under the two dimensions of post-supply supervision and construction supervision;

[0008] S2: Map the two decision timestamps to a unified timeline;

[0009] S3: Extract the evidence node identifiers and conclusions on which the state judgment results of each dimension depend. If there are overlapping evidence nodes pointing to the same monitoring fact and having opposite conclusions, the judgment logic is mutually exclusive.

[0010] S4: When logically mutually exclusive, calculate the time coverage uniformity of each node in the evidence chain of the two dimensions on a unified time axis, and use the dimension with higher time coverage uniformity as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution.

[0011] S5: When the difference in time coverage uniformity between the two is less than the preset difference threshold, the dimension to which the earlier node in the effective time window of the two-dimensional evidence nodes belongs is identified on the unified time axis as the reference direction.

[0012] S6: Correct the state determination result in another dimension based on the state determination result in the baseline direction, and generate a unique comprehensive regulatory state for the corresponding land parcel at the current moment.

[0013] Furthermore, obtain the status determination results and determination timestamps for the same land parcel under both post-supply supervision and construction supervision dimensions, including:

[0014] Obtain the post-supply supervision status determination results generated independently by the post-supply supervision system under the post-supply supervision dimension for the same land parcel, and extract the post-supply supervision determination timestamp that generated the post-supply supervision status determination results;

[0015] Obtain the engineering construction supervision status determination results generated independently by the engineering construction supervision system under the engineering construction supervision dimension for the same land parcel, and extract the engineering construction supervision determination timestamp that generated the engineering construction supervision status determination results.

[0016] Furthermore, the two decision timestamps are mapped to a unified timeline, including:

[0017] The earliest time value between the post-supply supervision judgment time stamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment time stamp is selected as the reference starting point of the unified time axis, and the unified time axis is constructed with the reference starting point as the origin.

[0018] The post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp are mapped to their respective positions on a unified time axis according to their time difference with the benchmark starting point.

[0019] Furthermore, the evidence node identifiers and conclusions upon which the state determination results of each dimension depend are extracted. If there are overlapping evidence nodes pointing to the same monitoring fact but with contradictory conclusions, the determination logic is mutually exclusive, including:

[0020] Extract the post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers and their corresponding post-supply supervision analysis conclusions from the generation log of the post-supply supervision status determination results; extract the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifiers and their corresponding engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions from the generation log of the engineering construction supervision status determination results.

[0021] The data source identifiers for post-supply supervision data collection referenced by the evidence node identifiers for post-supply supervision are analyzed; the data source identifiers for construction supervision data collection referenced by the evidence node identifiers for construction supervision are analyzed.

[0022] When the data source identifier for post-supply supervision and the data source identifier for construction supervision point to the same data source, the post-supply supervision analysis conclusion and the construction supervision analysis conclusion obtained after the same data source is independently analyzed in the post-supply supervision dimension and the construction supervision dimension, respectively, are extracted in reverse. The reverse extraction is a targeted extraction performed with the same data source as the positioning condition from the established correspondence between the evidence node identifiers of post-supply supervision and the analysis conclusions of post-supply supervision, as well as the correspondence between the evidence node identifiers of construction supervision and the analysis conclusions of construction supervision.

[0023] If the conclusions of the post-supply supervision analysis are contrary to those of the engineering construction supervision analysis, then it is determined that there is logical mutual exclusion.

[0024] Furthermore, the source identifiers for post-supply supervision data collection include at least one of the following: drone patrol image batch identifiers, construction site probe location identifiers, and field patrol photo shooting location identifiers. The source identifiers for engineering construction supervision data collection include at least one of the following: drone patrol image batch identifiers, construction site probe location identifiers, and field patrol photo shooting location identifiers.

[0025] Furthermore, when logically mutually exclusive, the time coverage uniformity of each node in the evidence chain in two dimensions is calculated separately on a unified time axis. The dimension with higher time coverage uniformity is used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution, including:

[0026] On a unified timeline, the period between the earliest and latest timestamps of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp is defined as the monitoring and evaluation period.

[0027] The monitoring and evaluation period is divided into several continuous time grids at equal intervals;

[0028] Extract the timestamps of the post-supply supervision evidence nodes corresponding to the post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers one by one, count the distribution of each node in the post-supply supervision evidence chain in all time grids, and calculate the ratio of the number of time grids in which post-supply supervision evidence nodes fall to the total number of time grids as the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage.

[0029] Extract the timestamps of the engineering construction supervision evidence nodes corresponding to the node identifiers, calculate the distribution of each node in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain across all time grids, and calculate the ratio of the number of time grids in which engineering construction supervision evidence nodes fall to the total number of time grids as the uniformity of engineering construction supervision time coverage.

[0030] Compare the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage with the uniformity of construction supervision time coverage. When the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage is higher than that of construction supervision time coverage, the post-supply supervision dimension shall be used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution.

[0031] Furthermore, the monitoring and evaluation period is divided into time grids by using the ratio of the total duration of the monitoring and evaluation period to the sum of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain and the total number of evidence nodes in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain as the grid division step size.

[0032] Furthermore, when the difference in the uniformity of time coverage between the two is less than a preset difference threshold, the dimension to which the earlier-timed node belongs within the effective time window of the evidence nodes in both dimensions is identified on a unified time axis as the reference direction, including:

[0033] The absolute value of the difference between the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage and the uniformity of engineering construction supervision time coverage is calculated as the uniformity difference value, and the uniformity difference value is compared with the preset difference threshold.

[0034] When the uniformity difference is less than the preset difference threshold, the start time and end time of the post-supply supervision effect of each evidence node in the post-supply supervision evidence chain are extracted to form the post-supply supervision evidence node effect time window. The start time and end time of the engineering construction supervision effect of each evidence node in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain are extracted to form the engineering construction supervision evidence node effect time window.

[0035] On a unified timeline, compare the start time of the effective time window of all post-supply supervision evidence nodes with the start time of the effective time window of all engineering construction supervision evidence nodes, and identify the evidence node corresponding to the effective time window with the earliest start time.

[0036] The regulatory dimension to which the earliest effective window begins is assigned is used as the benchmark for conflict resolution.

[0037] Furthermore, the effective start time of post-supply supervision is the timestamp of the post-supply supervision evidence node corresponding to the post-supply supervision evidence node, and the effective end time of post-supply supervision is the time when the post-supply supervision evidence node is covered by a new round of similar evidence nodes; the effective start time of construction supervision is the timestamp of the construction supervision evidence node corresponding to the construction supervision evidence node, and the effective end time of construction supervision is the time when the construction supervision evidence node is covered by a new round of similar evidence nodes.

[0038] Furthermore, the status determination result in the baseline direction is used to correct the status determination result in another dimension, generating a unique comprehensive regulatory status for the corresponding land parcel at the current moment, including:

[0039] Extract the baseline status determination result corresponding to the baseline direction of the conflict resolution, and extract the status determination result to be corrected corresponding to the other regulatory dimension opposite to the baseline direction;

[0040] Replace the regulatory status label corresponding to the status determination result to be corrected with the baseline status determination result, while keeping the chain of evidence under the baseline direction associated with the baseline status determination result unchanged;

[0041] The revised baseline status determination result will be output as the unique comprehensive regulatory status of the corresponding land parcel at the current moment.

[0042] The beneficial effects of this invention are:

[0043] 1. By obtaining the status determination results and their timestamps for the same land parcel under both post-supply supervision and construction supervision, and mapping them to a unified timeline, the problem of missing temporal correlation caused by inconsistent time bases between different supervision systems is solved. Based on this, by extracting the evidence node identifiers and conclusions on which the status determination results of each dimension depend, and tracing back along the evidence nodes to the data collection source identifier for cross-comparison, the hidden conflict between the two supervision dimensions that draw opposite conclusions on the same monitoring facts can be discovered. The existence of logical mutual exclusion is automatically determined, avoiding misjudgment and omission caused by relying solely on the superficial consistency or contradiction of status labels. This transforms the identification of cross-dimensional supervision status conflicts from relying on manual experience to traceable automated determination.

[0044] 2. When logical mutual exclusion is determined, this invention introduces time coverage uniformity as a quantitative parameter for conflict resolution. By evaluating the monitoring continuity of the two-dimensional evidence chains on a unified time axis, the direction of acceptance is determined, ensuring that the resolution is based on an objective comparison of evidence density rather than subjective judgment. Simultaneously, a uniformity difference threshold is set as a bifurcation condition for the resolution path. When the time coverage uniformity difference is not significant, the baseline direction is determined by the dimension to which the evidence node with the earlier time sequence in the effective time window belongs. This balances the timeliness of regulatory response when evidence sufficiency is similar. Finally, the status determination result under the baseline direction is used to correct the other dimension, generating a unique comprehensive regulatory status. This ensures the certainty and consistency of regulatory information output, providing a unified data foundation for the closed-loop handling of integrated supervision of construction land in county-level administrative regions. It reduces manual intervention in the status resolution process and improves the traceability and transparency of regulatory conclusions. Attached Figure Description

[0045] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of an integrated supervision method for land and construction land in county-level administrative regions according to the present invention;

[0046] Figure 2This is a flowchart illustrating the conflict resolution benchmark direction determination process based on the effective time window sequence of this invention. Detailed Implementation

[0047] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0048] Example: Figure 1 This invention presents a method for integrated supervision of land and construction land in county-level administrative regions, comprising:

[0049] S1: Obtain the status determination results and determination timestamps of the same land parcel under the two dimensions of post-supply supervision and construction supervision;

[0050] S2: Map the two decision timestamps to a unified timeline;

[0051] S3: Extract the evidence node identifiers and conclusions on which the state judgment results of each dimension depend. If there are overlapping evidence nodes pointing to the same monitoring fact and having opposite conclusions, the judgment logic is mutually exclusive.

[0052] S4: When logically mutually exclusive, calculate the time coverage uniformity of each node in the evidence chain of the two dimensions on a unified time axis, and use the dimension with higher time coverage uniformity as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution.

[0053] S5: When the difference in time coverage uniformity between the two is less than the preset difference threshold, the dimension to which the earlier node in the effective time window of the two-dimensional evidence nodes belongs is identified on the unified time axis as the reference direction.

[0054] S6: Correct the state determination result in another dimension based on the state determination result in the baseline direction, and generate a unique comprehensive regulatory state for the corresponding land parcel at the current moment.

[0055] The process of obtaining the status assessment results and assessment timestamps for the same land parcel under both post-supply supervision and construction supervision dimensions is as follows:

[0056] In the information-based environment of county-level land resource management, the post-supply supervision system continuously monitors and assesses the land use status of land parcels that have completed land supply. The monitoring scope of the post-supply supervision system covers whether the land parcel obtained a construction permit and actually commenced construction within the contractually agreed commencement period, whether the project was completed and passed the as-built planning verification within the contractually agreed completion period, and whether there is land idling due to reasons attributable to the enterprise itself. Based on pre-configured supervision rules, the post-supply supervision system analyzes monitoring data collected from multiple data sources and independently generates post-supply supervision status assessment results. The post-supply supervision status assessment results represent the land use compliance status of the land parcel at the current moment in the form of supervision status labels. Specific forms of supervision status labels include one of the following: normal commencement, commencement in breach of contract, normal completion, completion in breach of contract, land idling, and inefficient use. While generating the post-supply supervision status determination result, the post-supply supervision system reads the current time value from the system clock and binds it to the post-supply supervision determination timestamp, storing it precisely at the moment the result was generated. The post-supply supervision determination timestamp uses either Unix or Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) format, enabling cross-system time alignment and comparison of determination timestamps from different supervision dimensions. This step retrieves the most recent post-supply supervision status determination result for the same parcel and the associated post-supply supervision determination timestamp from the post-supply supervision system's result output interface or stored record, using a targeted extraction operation based on the parcel identifier.

[0057] The construction supervision system monitors and assesses the construction process of the same land parcel after obtaining a construction permit. The monitoring scope covers whether the construction drawings are consistent with the approved construction plan, whether the foundation construction meets the line verification requirements, whether the progress of the main construction matches the construction organization plan, whether the facade design and exterior decoration materials meet the planning permit requirements, whether the public facilities and parking spaces in the supporting projects are constructed according to planning conditions, and the fulfillment of the obligations of the construction agency and supporting facilities. The system acquires monitoring data from data sources such as construction drawing review and filing documents, images captured by construction site cameras, drone patrol images, and on-site inspection records. Based on the pre-set supervision rules for the construction supervision dimensions, it independently assesses each monitored item and generates a construction supervision status assessment result. The construction project supervision status determination result represents the compliance status of construction activities on the land parcel in terms of monitoring items such as construction drawing review, foundation engineering, main structure construction, exterior facade, supporting facilities, construction on behalf of others, supporting obligations, and temporary works, in the form of supervision status labels. The specific form of the supervision status label includes one of the following: compliant, non-compliant, normal construction, or abnormal construction. While generating the construction project supervision status determination result, the construction project supervision system reads the current time value from the system clock and binds this current time value as the construction project supervision determination timestamp with the construction project supervision status determination result. The construction project supervision determination timestamp accurately records the generation time of the construction project supervision status determination result. The format of the construction project supervision determination timestamp is either Unix timestamp format or Coordinated Universal Time format. This step retrieves the most recent construction project supervision status determination result for the same land parcel and the construction project supervision determination timestamp bound to that result from the judgment result output interface or judgment result storage record of the construction project supervision system through a targeted extraction operation using the land parcel identifier as the query condition.

[0058] The post-supply supervision system and the construction supervision system operate independently. They generate post-supply supervision status judgment results independently based on the pre-set supervision rules and data sources for the post-supply supervision dimension, and construction supervision status judgment results independently based on the pre-set supervision rules and data sources for the construction supervision dimension. The two systems do not cross-verify or correlate their judgment logic at the time of generation. Land parcel identifiers are used in both systems with a unified coding rule, taking the form of either a land parcel code or a plot number. This allows for precise correlation between the status judgment results of the same land parcel under both supervision dimensions. Both the post-supply supervision and construction supervision judgment timestamps are precise time records of the generation time of their respective supervision status judgment results. The temporal relationship between the two timestamps depends on the order in which the two systems independently complete their judgments; there is no pre-set generation order constraint. The post-supply supervision status determination result, post-supply supervision determination timestamp, engineering construction supervision status determination result, and engineering construction supervision determination timestamp obtained in this step will serve as the basic input data for subsequent steps to perform logical mutual exclusion determination and unified timeline mapping.

[0059] The process of mapping the two determination timestamps to a unified timeline is as follows:

[0060] After obtaining the post-supply supervision and construction supervision timestamps for the same land parcel, the time values ​​of the two timestamps are parsed and compared. Both timestamps are parsed using a unified time base. When the time format of the post-supply supervision timestamp differs from that of the construction supervision timestamp, both timestamps are first converted to numerical values ​​under the same time base before comparison. For example, the second-level value corresponding to a Unix timestamp and the second-level value corresponding to a Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) timestamp are converted to seconds before comparison. The earliest timestamp is identified by comparing the two timestamps. This earliest timestamp is used as the starting point of a unified timeline, corresponding to the origin on the unified timeline. When the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is earlier than the construction supervision judgment timestamp, the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is used as the reference starting point of the unified timeline, and its corresponding mapping position on the unified timeline is the origin of the unified timeline. Similarly, when the construction supervision judgment timestamp is earlier than the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp, the construction supervision judgment timestamp is used as the reference starting point of the unified timeline, and its corresponding mapping position on the unified timeline is the origin of the unified timeline. When the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp are equal, either the post-supply supervision timestamp or the construction supervision judgment timestamp is selected as the reference starting point of the unified timeline, and the other judgment timestamp's corresponding mapping position on the unified timeline is also the origin of the unified timeline.

[0061] A unified timeline extends along a single time direction from a reference starting point, aligning with the natural flow of time. Later times on the unified timeline correspond to positions further from the reference starting point. Time coordinates on the unified timeline are represented by relative time offsets calculated from the reference starting point. The unit of measurement for these relative time offsets is consistent with the time units used after parsing the post-supply supervision and construction supervision judgment timestamps. The interval between adjacent time positions on the unified timeline maintains a linear proportional relationship with the time difference between the post-supply supervision and construction supervision judgment timestamps, without compression or stretching. The unified timeline is constructed directly using the time information inherent in the post-supply supervision and construction supervision judgment timestamps themselves as the time reference source, without relying on the system clocks of the post-supply supervision system or the construction supervision system, thus avoiding time alignment deviations introduced by unsynchronized system clocks between different supervision systems.

[0062] The post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is mapped to its corresponding position on a unified timeline by calculating the time difference between the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the baseline starting point. This calculated time difference is used as the mapped position coordinate of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp on the unified timeline. When calculating the time difference between the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the baseline starting point, the parsed time value of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is subtracted from the parsed time value of the judgment timestamp corresponding to the baseline starting point. The result of this subtraction is the mapped position coordinate of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp on the unified timeline. When the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp itself is the baseline starting point, the parsed time value of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is equal to the parsed time value of the judgment timestamp corresponding to the baseline starting point, the time difference is 0, and the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is mapped to the origin position of the unified timeline. The mapped position coordinate of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp on the unified timeline is always a non-negative value. Mapping the construction supervision and judgment timestamp to its corresponding position on a unified timeline is achieved by calculating the time difference between the construction supervision and judgment timestamp and the baseline starting point. This calculated time difference serves as the mapped position coordinate of the construction supervision and judgment timestamp on the unified timeline. When calculating the time difference, the parsed time value of the construction supervision and judgment timestamp is subtracted from the parsed time value of the judgment timestamp corresponding to the baseline starting point. The result of this subtraction is the mapped position coordinate of the construction supervision and judgment timestamp on the unified timeline. When the construction supervision and judgment timestamp itself is the baseline starting point, the parsed time value of the construction supervision and judgment timestamp is equal to the parsed time value of the judgment timestamp corresponding to the baseline starting point, the time difference is 0, and the construction supervision and judgment timestamp is mapped to the origin position of the unified timeline. The mapped position coordinate of the construction supervision and judgment timestamp on the unified timeline is always a non-negative value.

[0063] The relative relationship between the mapped coordinates of the two judgment timestamps on a unified timeline directly reflects the temporal sequence between the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp. When the mapped coordinate of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp on the unified timeline is less than that of the construction supervision judgment timestamp, it indicates that the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is earlier than the construction supervision judgment timestamp. When the mapped coordinate of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is greater than that of the construction supervision judgment timestamp, it indicates that the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is later than the construction supervision judgment timestamp. When the mapped coordinate of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is equal to that of the construction supervision judgment timestamp, it indicates that the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp are synchronized. The relative relationship between the mapped positions of the two judgment timestamps on the unified timeline provides a unified temporal reference framework for subsequent steps, including mutual exclusion of judgment logic, calculation of the time coverage uniformity of each node in the two-dimensional evidence chain, and identification of nodes with earlier timestamps within the effective time window of the evidence nodes.

[0064] After mapping the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp to a unified timeline, the unified timeline simultaneously carries the mapping positions corresponding to both the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp. The unified timeline is associated with the land parcel identifier for the same land parcel, allowing subsequent steps to reuse the baseline starting point and mapping position relationship of the unified timeline when processing the time data of post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers and construction supervision evidence node identifiers for the same land parcel. The construction process of the unified timeline and the mapping process of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp do not modify the original time values ​​of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp. The original time values ​​of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the construction supervision judgment timestamp are fully preserved after mapping, so that subsequent steps can directly use them as the time basis when extracting the post-supply supervision effective start time, post-supply supervision effective end time, construction supervision effective start time, and construction supervision effective end time of the evidence nodes.

[0065] The process of extracting the evidence node identifiers and conclusions upon which the state determination results of each dimension depend, and determining logical mutual exclusion when there are overlapping evidence nodes pointing to the same monitoring fact and having contradictory conclusions, is as follows:

[0066] The post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers and corresponding post-supply supervision analysis conclusions are extracted from the post-supply supervision status determination result generation log. The post-supply supervision status determination result generation log is a runtime log file synchronously written by the post-supply supervision system during the generation of the status determination result. This log records the metadata of each evidence node called by the post-supply supervision system during this status determination process in chronological order. The post-supply supervision evidence node identifier is a unique identifier assigned to each referenced evidence node when generating the status determination result. The encoding rules of the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier embed the evidence node's collection time information and collection source type information. By parsing the encoding structure of the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier, the data collection source corresponding to that evidence node can be traced back. The post-supply supervision analysis conclusion is a judgment conclusion derived by the post-supply supervision system after analyzing the monitoring data pointed to by the post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers according to the pre-set supervision rules of the post-supply supervision dimension. The post-supply supervision analysis conclusion is stored in the form of classification labels. The specific values ​​of the classification labels are selected from the value range of the supervision status labels corresponding to the post-supply supervision status judgment results. For example, the specific values ​​of the classification labels include normal commencement, commencement default, normal completion, completion default, and land idling or inefficient use. The operation process of extracting the post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers and their corresponding post-supply supervision analysis conclusions is as follows: traverse each record in the log file generated by the post-supply supervision status judgment results, read the evidence node identifier field and the analysis conclusion field in the record, establish a key-value pair correspondence between the read post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers and the post-supply supervision analysis conclusions, and store all key-value pairs in the post-supply supervision evidence node list.

[0067] The engineering construction supervision evidence node identifiers and corresponding engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions are extracted from the generation log of the engineering construction supervision status determination results. The generation log of the engineering construction supervision status determination results is a runtime log file synchronously written by the engineering construction supervision system during the generation of the results. This log records the metadata of each evidence node called by the system during the status determination process in chronological order. The engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier is a unique identifier assigned to each referenced evidence node when generating the status determination results. The encoding rules of the evidence node identifier embed the evidence node's collection time and source type information. By parsing the encoding structure of the evidence node identifier, the data collection source corresponding to that evidence node can be traced back. The engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion is a judgment conclusion derived by the engineering construction supervision system after analyzing the monitoring data pointed to by the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifiers according to the pre-set supervision rules of the engineering construction supervision dimension. The engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion is stored in the form of classification tags. The specific values ​​of the classification tags are selected from the value range of the supervision status tags corresponding to the engineering construction supervision status judgment results. For example, the specific values ​​of the classification tags include compliant, non-compliant, normal construction, or abnormal construction. The operation process of extracting the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifiers and their corresponding engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions is as follows: traverse each record in the log file generated by the engineering construction supervision status judgment results, read the evidence node identifier field and the analysis conclusion field in the record, establish a key-value pair correspondence between the read engineering construction supervision evidence node identifiers and the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions, and store all key-value pairs in the engineering construction supervision evidence node list.

[0068] The data source identifier for post-supply supervision data collection referenced by the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier is extracted from the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier. The coding rules for the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier define a coding segment for the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier. By locating the start and end positions of this coding segment, the corresponding character sequence is extracted and used as the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier. The post-supply supervision data collection source identifier uniquely identifies the data collection source of the original monitoring data upon which the evidence node in the post-supply supervision dimension depends. Specific forms of the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier include one of the following: drone patrol image batch identifier, construction site probe location identifier, or field patrol photo capture point identifier. The data source identifier for engineering construction supervision data collection referenced by the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier is also extracted from the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier. The coding rules for identifying evidence nodes in construction project supervision define a coding segment for the source identification of construction project supervision data collection. By locating the start and end positions of this coding segment, the character sequence corresponding to the segment is extracted and used as the source identification for the construction project supervision data collection. This source identification uniquely identifies the data collection source of the original monitoring data upon which the evidence node in the construction project supervision dimension depends. Specific forms of this source identification include one of the following: drone patrol image batch identifier, construction site probe location identifier, or field inspection photo capture point identifier.

[0069] After parsing and obtaining the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier and the engineering construction supervision data collection source identifier, the character sequence of the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier is matched character by character with the character sequence of the engineering construction supervision data collection source identifier. When all characters of the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier and all characters of the engineering construction supervision data collection source identifier match at the same position, it is determined that the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier and the engineering construction supervision data collection source identifier point to the same data collection source. When it is determined that the post-supply supervision data collection source identifier and the engineering construction supervision data collection source identifier point to the same data collection source, a reverse extraction operation is performed. The reverse extraction operation extracts the post-supply supervision analysis conclusion corresponding to the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier by following the key-value pair relationship between the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier and the post-supply supervision analysis conclusion in the post-supply supervision evidence node list, and simultaneously extracts the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion corresponding to the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier by following the key-value pair relationship between the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier and the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion in the engineering construction supervision evidence node list. The extracted post-supply supervision analysis conclusions and engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions are classification labels obtained by independently analyzing the same data source under the post-supply supervision dimension and the engineering construction supervision dimension, respectively. The meaning of the classification label values ​​of the post-supply supervision analysis conclusions and the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions is compared. When the classification label value of the post-supply supervision analysis conclusion indicates that the land parcel is in a compliant state under the post-supply supervision dimension, while the classification label value of the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion indicates that the construction is in a non-compliant state under the engineering construction supervision dimension, the post-supply supervision analysis conclusions and the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions are determined to be opposite. When the classification label value of the post-supply supervision analysis conclusion indicates that the land parcel is in an unused state under the post-supply supervision dimension, while the classification label value of the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion indicates that there is construction activity on the land parcel under the engineering construction supervision dimension, the post-supply supervision analysis conclusions and the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions are determined to be opposite. Once it is determined that the post-supply supervision analysis conclusion is contrary to the engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion, that is, it is determined that there is a logical mutual exclusion between the post-supply supervision status determination result and the engineering construction supervision status determination result, the conclusion that the logical mutual exclusion exists, together with the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier, post-supply supervision data collection source identifier, post-supply supervision analysis conclusion, engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier, engineering construction supervision data collection source identifier, and engineering construction supervision analysis conclusion that triggered the logical mutual exclusion, are recorded as the input basis for conflict adjudication in subsequent steps.

[0070] When a logical mutual exclusion is determined, the process of calculating the time coverage uniformity of each node in the evidence chain in two dimensions on a unified time axis, and using the dimension with higher time coverage uniformity as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution, is as follows:

[0071] Monitoring and evaluation periods are defined on a unified timeline. The start point of the monitoring and evaluation period is the mapping position on the unified timeline corresponding to the earliest time value of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp. The end point of the monitoring and evaluation period is the mapping position on the unified timeline corresponding to the latest time value of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp. When the time value of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp is earlier than that of the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp, the start point of the monitoring and evaluation period is the mapping position of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp on the unified timeline, and the end point of the monitoring and evaluation period is the mapping position of the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp on the unified timeline. The monitoring and evaluation period covers the entire time span during which the post-supply supervision system and the engineering construction supervision system complete their respective status determinations. The monitoring and evaluation period occupies a continuous interval on a unified time axis. The total duration of the monitoring and evaluation period is equal to the difference between the latest time value of the post-supply supervision determination time stamp and the engineering construction supervision determination time stamp and the earliest time value of the post-supply supervision determination time stamp and the engineering construction supervision determination time stamp.

[0072] The monitoring and evaluation period is divided into several consecutive time grids at equal intervals. The grid division step size is determined by the ratio of the total duration of the monitoring and evaluation period to the sum of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain and the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain. The total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is obtained by counting the total number of post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers from the post-supply supervision evidence node list, and the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence node chain is obtained by counting the total number of construction supervision evidence node identifiers from the construction supervision evidence node list. The sum of the two evidence nodes is then used to obtain the total number of evidence nodes. The total duration of the monitoring and evaluation period is divided by the sum of the total number of evidence nodes, and the quotient is used as the grid division step size. For example, when the total duration of the monitoring and evaluation period is 86,400 time units, the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is 5, the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain is 7, and the sum of the total number of evidence nodes is 12, the grid division step size is 86,400 / 12 = 7,200 time units. Using the start of the monitoring and evaluation period as the initial boundary of the first time grid, and using the grid's division step size as the interval, the boundaries of each time grid are sequentially drawn along a unified time axis. The first time grid covers the time interval from the start of the monitoring and evaluation period to the position reached by the start of the monitoring and evaluation period plus the grid's division step size. The second time grid covers the time interval from the end position of the first time grid to the position reached by the end position of the first time grid plus the grid's division step size. This process is repeated until the coverage of all time grids reaches or exceeds the end of the monitoring and evaluation period. All time grids are numbered sequentially according to their generation order to obtain the total number of time grids. When the sum of the total number of evidence nodes is 0, the grid division step size is directly taken as the total duration of the monitoring and evaluation period, and the total number of time grids is 1.

[0073] The timestamps of post-supply supervision evidence nodes corresponding to the node identifiers are extracted one by one. The distribution of each node in the post-supply supervision evidence chain across all time grids is statistically analyzed, and the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage is calculated. For each post-supply supervision evidence node identifier in the list of post-supply supervision evidence nodes, the post-supply supervision node timestamp is parsed from the encoding structure of the identifier. The post-supply supervision node timestamp is the time value of the original monitoring data that the post-supply supervision system relies on to collect the evidence node. The time format of the post-supply supervision node timestamp is consistent with the time format used by the unified time axis. Each post-supply supervision node timestamp is mapped to the unified time axis to obtain the mapped position of the post-supply supervision node. The mapping method is to calculate the time difference between the post-supply supervision node timestamp and the baseline starting point of the unified time axis, and use the time difference as the coordinate value of the mapped position of the post-supply supervision node. For each post-supply supervision node, determine which time grid its mapped location falls within. If the coordinates of the mapped location are greater than or equal to the start boundary of a time grid and less than its end boundary, then the post-supply supervision evidence node is considered to fall within that time grid. For each time grid to which one or more post-supply supervision evidence nodes fall, mark it as a post-supply supervision coverage grid. Count the number of time grids marked as post-supply supervision coverage grids across all time grids. Divide this number by the total number of time grids; the resulting ratio is the post-supply supervision time coverage uniformity, which ranges from 0 to 1.

[0074] The timestamps corresponding to the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifiers are extracted one by one. The distribution of each node in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain across all time grids is statistically analyzed, and the uniformity of engineering construction supervision time coverage is calculated. For each engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier in the list of engineering construction supervision evidence nodes, the engineering construction supervision node timestamp is parsed from the encoding structure of the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier. The engineering construction supervision node timestamp is the time value of the original monitoring data that the engineering construction supervision system relies on to collect the engineering construction supervision evidence node. The time format of the engineering construction supervision node timestamp is consistent with the time format used by the unified time axis. Each engineering construction supervision node timestamp is mapped to the unified time axis to obtain the engineering construction supervision node mapping position. The mapping method is to calculate the time difference between the engineering construction supervision node timestamp and the reference starting point of the unified time axis, and use the time difference as the coordinate value of the engineering construction supervision node mapping position. For each construction supervision node, determine which time grid its mapped location falls within. If the coordinates of the mapped location are greater than or equal to the start boundary of a time grid and less than its end boundary, then the construction supervision evidence node is considered to fall within that time grid. For each time grid to which one or more construction supervision evidence nodes fall, mark it as a construction supervision coverage grid. Count the number of time grids marked as construction supervision coverage grids across all time grids. Divide this number by the total number of time grids; the resulting ratio is the construction supervision time coverage uniformity, which ranges from 0 to 1.

[0075] The uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage is compared with that of construction supervision time coverage. When the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage is greater than that of construction supervision time coverage, it is determined that the post-supply supervision time coverage is higher than that of construction supervision time coverage, and the post-supply supervision dimension is used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution. Similarly, when the uniformity of construction supervision time coverage is greater than that of post-supply supervision time coverage, it is determined that the construction supervision time coverage is higher than that of post-supply supervision time coverage, and the construction supervision dimension is used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution. When the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage is equal to that of construction supervision time coverage, there is no difference in the time coverage uniformity between the two supervision dimensions. In this case, the next step involves identifying the dimension to which the earlier effective evidence node belongs to determine the benchmark direction. After the benchmark direction for conflict resolution is determined, the corresponding supervision dimension identifier is recorded as the basis for extracting the state determination results under the benchmark direction and for correcting the state determination results to be corrected in subsequent steps.

[0076] Figure 2 The flowchart of the conflict adjudication benchmark direction determination based on the effective time window sequence of the present invention is given. When the difference between the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage and the uniformity of engineering construction supervision time coverage is less than a preset difference threshold, the process of identifying the dimension to which the earlier node in the effective time window of the evidence node belongs as the benchmark direction on a unified time axis is as follows:

[0077] Calculate the absolute value of the difference between the post-supply supervision time coverage uniformity and the construction supervision time coverage uniformity, and use this absolute value as the uniformity difference. The post-supply supervision time coverage uniformity is the ratio of the number of post-supply supervision coverage grids calculated in the previous step to the total number of all time grids. The construction supervision time coverage uniformity is the ratio of the number of construction supervision coverage grids calculated in the previous step to the total number of all time grids. Subtract the construction supervision time coverage uniformity from the post-supply supervision time coverage uniformity. If the subtraction result is negative, take the opposite of the subtraction result. The non-negative value obtained is the uniformity difference, which ranges from 0 to 1.

[0078] The uniformity difference is compared with a preset difference threshold. The preset difference threshold is a pre-defined boundary value used to determine whether the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage and the uniformity of construction supervision time coverage are sufficiently close. The preset difference threshold is set by calculating the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain and the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain, respectively, and taking the larger of these two values ​​as the preset difference threshold. When the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is smaller than the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain, the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is greater than the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain, and the preset difference threshold is taken as the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain. When the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain is small while the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is large, the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain is greater than the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain. The preset difference threshold is taken as the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain. When the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is equal to the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain, the preset difference threshold is taken as either the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain or the reciprocal of the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain. For example, if the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is 5 and its reciprocal is 0.2, and the total number of evidence nodes in the construction supervision evidence chain is 8 and its reciprocal is 0.125, then the preset difference threshold is 0.2, since the reciprocal of 0.2 in the post-supply supervision evidence chain is greater than the reciprocal of 0.125 in the construction supervision evidence chain. When the uniformity difference is less than the preset difference threshold, it indicates that the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage and the uniformity of construction supervision time coverage are highly similar in value. In this case, the benchmark direction is not determined by the level of time coverage uniformity, but by the dimension to which the earlier node in the evidence node's effective time window belongs. When the uniformity difference is greater than or equal to the preset difference threshold, it indicates that there is a significant gap between the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage and the uniformity of construction supervision time coverage. In this case, the supervision dimension with higher time coverage uniformity is still used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution.

[0079] When the uniformity difference is less than a preset difference threshold, the start and end times of post-supply supervision effectiveness for each evidence node in the post-supply supervision evidence chain are extracted to form the post-supply supervision evidence node effectiveness time window. For each post-supply supervision evidence node identifier in the post-supply supervision evidence node list, the start time of post-supply supervision effectiveness is taken as the value of the post-supply supervision node timestamp corresponding to the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier. The post-supply supervision node timestamp is the time value at which the post-supply supervision system collected the original monitoring data relied upon by the post-supply supervision evidence node, which is parsed from the encoding structure of the post-supply supervision evidence node identifier during the step of calculating the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage. The end time of post-supply supervision effectiveness is taken as the time when the post-supply supervision evidence node is covered by a new round of similar evidence nodes. Similar evidence nodes refer to two post-supply supervision evidence nodes whose respective post-supply supervision data collection source identifiers have the same character field representing the collection source type. A new round of similar evidence nodes refers to the next post-supply supervision evidence node whose post-supply supervision node timestamp is later than the current post-supply supervision evidence node's timestamp on a unified time axis and belongs to the same type as the current post-supply supervision evidence node. When a new round of similar evidence nodes exists, the timestamp of the corresponding post-supply supervision node is used as the effective deadline for post-supply supervision of the current post-supply supervision evidence node. When a new round of similar evidence nodes does not exist, the time corresponding to the end of the monitoring and evaluation period on a unified time axis is used as the effective deadline for post-supply supervision of the current post-supply supervision evidence node. The effective start time and effective end time of post-supply supervision together define a continuous time interval on a unified time axis, which is the effective time window of the post-supply supervision evidence node.

[0080] When the uniformity difference is less than a preset difference threshold, the effective start time and effective end time of engineering construction supervision for each evidence node in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain are extracted simultaneously, forming the effective time window of the engineering construction supervision evidence node. For each engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier in the engineering construction supervision evidence node list, the effective start time of engineering construction supervision is taken as the value of the timestamp of the engineering construction supervision node corresponding to the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier. The timestamp of the engineering construction supervision node is the time value of the original monitoring data collected by the engineering construction supervision system from the encoding structure of the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifier during the step of calculating the uniformity of engineering construction supervision time coverage. The effective end time of engineering construction supervision is taken as the time when the engineering construction supervision evidence node is covered by a new round of evidence nodes of the same type. Evidence nodes of the same type refer to two engineering construction supervision evidence nodes whose respective engineering construction supervision data collection source identifiers have the same character field representing the collection source type. A new round of evidence nodes of the same type refers to the next engineering construction supervision evidence node whose timestamp is later than the timestamp of the current engineering construction supervision evidence node on the same time axis and belongs to the same type as the current engineering construction supervision evidence node. When a new round of similar evidence nodes exists, the timestamp of the corresponding construction supervision node is used as the effective deadline for construction supervision of the current construction supervision evidence node. When a new round of similar evidence nodes does not exist, the time corresponding to the end of the monitoring and evaluation period on a unified time axis is used as the effective deadline for construction supervision of the current construction supervision evidence node. The effective start time and effective end time of construction supervision together define a continuous time interval on a unified time axis, which is the effective time window of the construction supervision evidence node.

[0081] On a unified timeline, compare the start times of the effective time windows of all post-supply supervision evidence nodes with the start times of the effective time windows of all construction supervision evidence nodes to identify the evidence node corresponding to the earliest start time effective time window. Collect the post-supply supervision effective start times of all post-supply supervision evidence node effective time windows with the construction supervision effective start times of all construction supervision evidence node effective time windows into the same time value set. Compare the magnitude of each time value in the time value set on the unified timeline and find the time value with the smallest time value. The moment corresponding to the time value with the smallest time value is the earliest start time. Determine the effective time window to which the earliest start time belongs as the earliest effective time window, and determine the evidence node corresponding to the earliest effective time window as the evidence node corresponding to the earliest effective time window. When multiple effective time windows have the same and are all the earliest, extract the effective end time for each effective time window with the same start time, compare the magnitude of the effective end times of each effective time window with the same start time, and determine the effective time window with the earliest effective end time as the earliest start time effective time window.

[0082] The regulatory dimension to which the earliest effective time window begins is assigned is used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution. When the earliest effective time window begins is the effective time window of a post-supply regulatory evidence node, the regulatory dimension to which the post-supply regulatory evidence node's effective time window belongs is the post-supply regulatory dimension, and this post-supply regulatory dimension is used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution. When the earliest effective time window begins is the effective time window of an engineering construction regulatory evidence node, the regulatory dimension to which the engineering construction regulatory evidence node's effective time window belongs is the engineering construction regulatory dimension, and this engineering construction regulatory dimension is used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution. The regulatory dimension identifier corresponding to the benchmark direction for conflict resolution is recorded, serving as the basis for extracting the status determination results under the benchmark direction and for correcting the status determination results to be corrected in subsequent steps.

[0083] The process of correcting the state determination result in another dimension based on the state determination result in the baseline direction, and generating a unique comprehensive regulatory state for the corresponding land parcel at the current moment, is as follows:

[0084] Extract the baseline status determination result corresponding to the baseline direction of conflict resolution. The baseline direction of conflict resolution is the regulatory dimension pointed to by the regulatory dimension identifier determined and recorded in the previous step through time coverage uniformity comparison or through the identification of prior evidence nodes in the time sequence. The specific values ​​of the regulatory dimension identifier include two types: post-supply regulation dimension and construction supervision dimension. When the value of the regulatory dimension identifier is post-supply regulation dimension, the baseline direction of conflict resolution is post-supply regulation dimension. Extract the post-supply regulation status determination result extracted from the determination result output interface or determination result storage record of the post-supply regulation system in the step of obtaining the status determination results and determination timestamps of the same land parcel under both post-supply regulation and construction supervision dimensions. Use the extracted post-supply regulation status determination result as the baseline status determination result. When the regulatory dimension identifier is set to the engineering construction regulatory dimension, the benchmark direction for conflict adjudication is the engineering construction regulatory dimension. The engineering construction regulatory status judgment result is extracted from the judgment result output interface or judgment result storage record of the engineering construction regulatory system during the step of obtaining the status judgment results and judgment timestamps for the same land parcel under both post-supply regulation and engineering construction regulation dimensions. This extracted engineering construction regulatory status judgment result is used as the benchmark status judgment result. The benchmark status judgment result consists of two parts: a regulatory status label and an evidence chain under the benchmark direction. The regulatory status label corresponding to the benchmark status judgment result is the classification label value given by the regulatory system under the benchmark direction for the current compliance status of the land parcel. The evidence chain under the benchmark direction is an evidence sequence composed of all evidence nodes called by the regulatory system under the benchmark direction in the process of generating the benchmark status judgment result, arranged in chronological order.

[0085] Extract the status determination result to be corrected corresponding to the other regulatory dimension opposite to the benchmark direction. The other regulatory dimension refers to the remaining regulatory dimension after removing the regulatory dimension pointed to by the benchmark direction of the conflict resolution from the post-supply regulatory dimension and the construction project regulatory dimension. When the benchmark direction of the conflict resolution is the post-supply regulatory dimension, the other regulatory dimension is the construction project regulatory dimension; when the benchmark direction of the conflict resolution is the construction project regulatory dimension, the other regulatory dimension is the post-supply regulatory dimension. When the other regulatory dimension is the construction project regulatory dimension, extract the construction project regulatory status determination result obtained from the determination result output interface or determination result storage record of the construction project regulatory system during the step of obtaining the status determination results and determination timestamps of the same land parcel under both the post-supply and construction project regulatory dimensions. Use the extracted construction project regulatory status determination result as the status determination result to be corrected. When the other regulatory dimension is post-supply supervision, the post-supply supervision status determination result extracted from the post-supply supervision system's determination result output interface or determination result storage record is obtained during the step of acquiring the status determination results and determination timestamps of the same land parcel under both post-supply supervision and construction supervision dimensions. This extracted post-supply supervision status determination result is used as the status determination result to be corrected. The status determination result to be corrected consists of two parts: a regulatory status label and an evidence chain under the other regulatory dimension. The regulatory status label corresponding to the status determination result to be corrected is the classification label value given by the regulatory system under the other regulatory dimension for the current compliance status of the land parcel.

[0086] The regulatory status label corresponding to the status determination result to be corrected is replaced with the baseline status determination result, while ensuring that the evidence chain under the baseline direction associated with the baseline status determination result remains unchanged during the correction process. Specifically, the method for replacing the regulatory status label corresponding to the status determination result to be corrected involves reading the value of the regulatory status label from the baseline status determination result and overwriting the read value into the storage location of the regulatory status label in the status determination result to be corrected. After overwriting, the value of the regulatory status label in the status determination result to be corrected is completely consistent with the value of the regulatory status label in the baseline status determination result. Simultaneously with replacing the regulatory status label, the evidence chain under the other regulatory dimension originally associated with the status determination result to be corrected is removed from the status determination result to be corrected, and the evidence chain under the baseline direction is taken as the sole evidence chain associated with the corrected status determination result. The specific way to keep the evidence chain under the benchmark direction associated with the benchmark state determination result unchanged is to not perform any operation of adding, deleting or modifying nodes in any evidence node in the evidence chain under the benchmark direction during the correction process. The evidence node identifier, node timestamp, data acquisition source identifier and analysis conclusion of each evidence node in the evidence chain under the benchmark direction remain unchanged before and after the correction process. The evidence chain associated with the corrected state determination result is completely identical to the evidence chain under the benchmark direction associated with the benchmark state determination result in terms of the number of nodes, node content and node arrangement order.

[0087] The revised baseline status determination result is output as the unique comprehensive regulatory status of the corresponding land parcel at the current moment. The revised baseline status determination result consists of a replaced regulatory status label and an evidence chain under the unchanged baseline direction. This revised baseline status determination result is the unique comprehensive regulatory status of the land parcel at the current moment. The unique comprehensive regulatory status is stored and indexed using the land parcel identifier as the primary key. The land parcel identifier uses the same encoding rules and values ​​as the land parcel identifier used when querying the post-supply supervision status determination result and the construction supervision status determination result of the same land parcel in both the post-supply supervision and construction supervision dimensions, ensuring accurate correspondence between the unique comprehensive regulatory status and the original status determination result of the same land parcel in both dimensions at the land parcel level. The unique comprehensive regulatory status is output by writing the revised baseline status determination result into the comprehensive regulatory status storage table of the integrated regulatory status database. The record fields written into the comprehensive regulatory status storage table include the land parcel identifier, comprehensive regulatory status label, baseline direction identifier, evidence chain serialization data, and the comprehensive regulatory timestamp of the output time. The integrated supervision timestamp is the current system time value at the moment the output operation is executed, used to record the generation time of the unique integrated supervision status. After the unique integrated supervision status is output, the supervision status of the land parcel at the current moment is represented by the unique integrated supervision status, no longer by two separate statuses: the post-supply supervision status judgment result and the engineering construction supervision status judgment result. Subsequent supervision statistics, abnormal alarms, and handling supervision of the land parcel will all use the unique integrated supervision status as the unified data basis.

[0088] The calculations involved in the embodiments are all dimensionless numerical calculations, and the preset parameters and thresholds in the calculations are set by those skilled in the art according to the actual situation.

[0089] It should be noted that this invention can be deployed on the device itself to realize embedded applications, or it can run on a PC or other terminal with a user interface, thereby meeting various hardware environments and usage requirements.

[0090] The above embodiments can be implemented, in whole or in part, by software, hardware, firmware, or any other combination thereof. When implemented using software, the above embodiments can be implemented, in whole or in part, as a computer program product. A computer program product includes one or more computer instructions or computer programs. When the computer instructions or computer programs are loaded or executed on a computer, all or part of the processes or functions according to the embodiments of this application are generated. The computer can be a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a computer network, or other programmable device. Computer instructions can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another. For example, computer instructions can be transmitted from one website, computer, server, or data center to another website, computer, server, or data center via wireless or wired transmission; wired transmission methods include optical fiber, twisted pair, coaxial cable, etc.; wireless transmission includes infrared, microwave, etc. Computer-readable storage media can be any available medium that a computer can access or a data storage device such as a server or data center that contains one or more sets of available media. Available media can be magnetic media (e.g., floppy disks, hard disks, magnetic tapes), optical media (e.g., DVDs), or semiconductor media. Semiconductor media can be solid-state drives.

[0091] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, apparatuses, and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for instance, the division of modules is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple modules or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed may be through some interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection between apparatuses or modules may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0092] The modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as modules may or may not be physical modules; they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network modules. Some or all of the modules can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0093] In addition, the functional modules in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into one processing module, or each module can exist physically separately, or two or more modules can be integrated into one module.

[0094] If a function is implemented as a software module and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or a portion of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods in the various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0095] The above are merely specific embodiments of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any variations or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technology disclosed in this application should be included within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A method for integrated supervision of land and construction land in county-level administrative regions, characterized in that, include: S1: Obtain the status determination results and determination timestamps of the same land parcel under the two dimensions of post-supply supervision and construction supervision; S2: Map the two decision timestamps to a unified timeline; S3: Extract the evidence node identifiers and conclusions on which the state judgment results of each dimension depend. If there are overlapping evidence nodes pointing to the same monitoring fact and having opposite conclusions, the judgment logic is mutually exclusive. S4: When logically mutually exclusive, calculate the time coverage uniformity of each node in the evidence chain of two dimensions on a unified time axis, and use the dimension with higher time coverage uniformity as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution, including: On a unified timeline, the period between the earliest and latest timestamps of the post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp is defined as the monitoring and evaluation period. The monitoring and evaluation period is divided into several continuous time grids at equal intervals; Extract the timestamps of the post-supply supervision evidence nodes corresponding to the post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers one by one, count the distribution of each node in the post-supply supervision evidence chain in all time grids, and calculate the ratio of the number of time grids in which post-supply supervision evidence nodes fall to the total number of time grids as the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage. Extract the timestamps of the engineering construction supervision evidence nodes corresponding to the node identifiers, calculate the distribution of each node in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain across all time grids, and calculate the ratio of the number of time grids in which engineering construction supervision evidence nodes fall to the total number of time grids as the uniformity of engineering construction supervision time coverage. Compare the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage with the uniformity of construction supervision time coverage. When the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage is higher than that of construction supervision time coverage, the post-supply supervision dimension shall be used as the benchmark direction for conflict resolution. S5: When the difference in time coverage uniformity between the two is less than the preset difference threshold, the dimension to which the earlier node in the effective time window of the two-dimensional evidence nodes belongs is identified on the unified time axis as the reference direction. S6: Correct the state determination result in another dimension based on the state determination result in the baseline direction, and generate a unique comprehensive regulatory state for the corresponding land parcel at the current moment.

2. The integrated land and construction land supervision method for county-level administrative regions according to claim 1, characterized in that, Obtain the status determination results and determination timestamps for the same land parcel under both post-supply supervision and construction supervision dimensions, including: Obtain the post-supply supervision status determination results generated independently by the post-supply supervision system under the post-supply supervision dimension for the same land parcel, and extract the post-supply supervision determination timestamp that generated the post-supply supervision status determination results; Obtain the engineering construction supervision status determination results generated independently by the engineering construction supervision system under the engineering construction supervision dimension for the same land parcel, and extract the engineering construction supervision determination timestamp that generated the engineering construction supervision status determination results.

3. The integrated land and construction land supervision method for county-level administrative regions according to claim 1, characterized in that, Mapping the two decision timestamps to a unified timeline includes: The earliest time value between the post-supply supervision judgment time stamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment time stamp is selected as the reference starting point of the unified time axis, and the unified time axis is constructed with the reference starting point as the origin. The post-supply supervision judgment timestamp and the engineering construction supervision judgment timestamp are mapped to their respective positions on a unified time axis according to their time difference with the benchmark starting point.

4. The integrated land and construction land supervision method for county-level administrative regions according to claim 1, characterized in that, Extract the evidence node identifiers and conclusions upon which the status determination results for each dimension depend. If there are overlapping evidence nodes pointing to the same monitoring fact but with contradictory conclusions, the determination logic is mutually exclusive, including: Extract the post-supply supervision evidence node identifiers and their corresponding post-supply supervision analysis conclusions from the generation log of the post-supply supervision status determination results; extract the engineering construction supervision evidence node identifiers and their corresponding engineering construction supervision analysis conclusions from the generation log of the engineering construction supervision status determination results. The data source identifiers for post-supply supervision data collection referenced by the evidence node identifiers for post-supply supervision are analyzed; the data source identifiers for construction supervision data collection referenced by the evidence node identifiers for construction supervision are analyzed. When the data source identifier for post-supply supervision and the data source identifier for construction supervision point to the same data source, the post-supply supervision analysis conclusion and the construction supervision analysis conclusion obtained after the same data source is independently analyzed in the post-supply supervision dimension and the construction supervision dimension, respectively, are extracted in reverse. The reverse extraction is a targeted extraction performed with the same data source as the positioning condition from the established correspondence between the evidence node identifiers of post-supply supervision and the analysis conclusions of post-supply supervision, as well as the correspondence between the evidence node identifiers of construction supervision and the analysis conclusions of construction supervision. If the conclusions of the post-supply supervision analysis are contrary to those of the engineering construction supervision analysis, then it is determined that there is logical mutual exclusion.

5. The integrated land and construction land supervision method for county-level administrative regions according to claim 4, characterized in that, The source identifiers for post-supply supervision data collection include at least one of the following: batch identifiers for drone patrol images, location identifiers for construction site probes, and location identifiers for field patrol photos. The source identifiers for engineering construction supervision data collection include at least one of the following: batch identifiers for drone patrol images, location identifiers for construction site probes, and location identifiers for field patrol photos.

6. The integrated land and construction land supervision method for county-level administrative regions according to claim 1, characterized in that, The monitoring and evaluation period is divided into time grids by using the ratio of the total duration of the monitoring and evaluation period to the sum of the total number of evidence nodes in the post-supply supervision evidence chain and the total number of evidence nodes in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain as the grid division step size.

7. The integrated land and construction land supervision method for county-level administrative regions according to claim 1, characterized in that, When the difference in time coverage uniformity between the two is less than a preset difference threshold, the dimension to which the earlier-timed node belongs within the effective time window of the evidence nodes in both dimensions is identified on a unified time axis as the reference direction, including: The absolute value of the difference between the uniformity of post-supply supervision time coverage and the uniformity of engineering construction supervision time coverage is calculated as the uniformity difference value, and the uniformity difference value is compared with the preset difference threshold. When the uniformity difference is less than the preset difference threshold, the start time and end time of the post-supply supervision effect of each evidence node in the post-supply supervision evidence chain are extracted to form the post-supply supervision evidence node effect time window. The start time and end time of the engineering construction supervision effect of each evidence node in the engineering construction supervision evidence chain are extracted to form the engineering construction supervision evidence node effect time window. On a unified timeline, compare the start time of the effective time window of all post-supply supervision evidence nodes with the start time of the effective time window of all engineering construction supervision evidence nodes, and identify the evidence node corresponding to the effective time window with the earliest start time. The regulatory dimension to which the earliest effective window begins is assigned is used as the benchmark for conflict resolution.

8. A method for integrated supervision of land and construction land in county-level administrative regions according to claim 7, characterized in that, The effective start time of post-supply supervision is the timestamp of the post-supply supervision evidence node corresponding to the post-supply supervision evidence node, and the effective end time of post-supply supervision is the time when the post-supply supervision evidence node is covered by a new round of evidence nodes of the same type. The effective start time of construction supervision is the timestamp of the construction supervision evidence node corresponding to the construction supervision evidence node, and the effective end time of construction supervision is the time when the construction supervision evidence node is covered by a new round of evidence nodes of the same type.

9. A method for integrated supervision of land and construction land in county-level administrative regions according to claim 1, characterized in that, The status determination result in the baseline direction is used to correct the status determination result in another dimension, generating a unique comprehensive regulatory status for the corresponding land parcel at the current moment, including: Extract the baseline status determination result corresponding to the baseline direction of the conflict resolution, and extract the status determination result to be corrected corresponding to the other regulatory dimension opposite to the baseline direction; Replace the regulatory status label corresponding to the status determination result to be corrected with the baseline status determination result, while keeping the chain of evidence under the baseline direction associated with the baseline status determination result unchanged; The revised baseline status determination result will be output as the unique comprehensive regulatory status of the corresponding land parcel at the current moment.

Images