An interface interaction method, system and device of a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score and a storage medium

Abstract

This invention discloses an interface interaction method, system, device, and storage medium for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring. It relates to the fields of unit operation evaluation and human-computer interaction technology. The method includes a first display mode that shows an overview of the overall unit score and associated sub-score information; a second display mode that displays sub-score information and includes a return button; responding to a selector element switching to a sub-selector element, switching back to the second display mode and loading the corresponding sub-score information; and responding to the return button, returning to the first display mode and displaying the corresponding sub-selector element. The method described in this invention achieves continuous connection between the overall unit score and sub-scores through score display, switching, loading, returning, and updating / replacing in two display modes, avoiding information disconnection after interface switching, inaccurate return positioning, and asynchrony between the displayed data and real-time data.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of unit operation assessment and human-machine interaction technology, specifically to an interface interaction method, system, device and storage medium for a unit operation assessment system based on economic reliability scoring. Background Technology

[0002] As generator unit operation management gradually develops towards refinement, digitalization, and visualization, comprehensive evaluation of unit operating status based on economic and reliability indicators has become an important technical means in unit operation monitoring, operation analysis, and management decision-making. Current technologies typically collect operating data from multiple dimensions, including boiler, turbine, and integrated systems, and combine this data with preset scoring rules to generate an overall unit score and corresponding sub-scores. This scoring information is then output through a graphical interface, allowing operators to view, compare, and analyze the unit's operating status. With the continuous increase in the number of evaluation indicators and the increasing refinement of scoring levels, related systems are no longer limited to displaying single scoring results. Instead, they are gradually forming a human-computer interaction mode that displays overall and sub-scores in parallel and integrates multi-level scoring analysis.

[0003] However, existing unit operation assessment systems still have shortcomings in terms of interface interaction: the overall score overview interface and the sub-score interface usually adopt a simple page jump method, lacking continuous interactive logic built around the current score object. As a result, after users enter the sub-score from the overall score, although they can view the local score results, it is difficult to maintain the association between the current analysis object and the superior score information when returning to the previous level interface. When the existing interface switches between different display modes, it often only completes the replacement of the displayed content, without performing collection, restoration and update processing on the current sub-score information. This easily leads to unclear connection between the overall score overview and the sub-score information, inaccurate positioning after returning, and data refresh being disconnected from the analysis context, thus affecting the continuous display and interaction efficiency of unit score information in multi-level interfaces. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In view of the above-mentioned problems, the present invention is proposed.

[0005] Therefore, the technical problem solved by this invention is that the existing unit operation evaluation system interface interaction method has problems such as poor continuity of scoring information after switching between different display modes, inaccurate return positioning, difficulty in maintaining associated display status, and inconsistency between data recovery display and real-time updates, as well as how to achieve continuous interaction between the overall scoring overview and the sub-item scoring information.

[0006] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this invention provides the following technical solution: a user interface interaction method for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, comprising: in a first display mode, displaying an overall unit scoring overview and associated sub-item scoring information on the display surface; in a second display mode, displaying sub-item scoring information on the display surface and providing a return button; in response to switching a selector element to a sub-selector element, triggering an interface switch to change the display surface from the first display mode to the second display mode, and loading the sub-item scoring information corresponding to the sub-selector element; in response to triggering the return button, returning the display surface to the first display mode, and displaying the sub-selector element corresponding to the current sub-item scoring information.

[0007] As a preferred embodiment of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score as described in this invention, the first display mode includes: the control device calling up the boiler score, turbine score and comprehensive professional score, and generating the unit total score according to the preset total score relationship.

[0008] The overall unit score is used as the main display data in the first display mode, and the boiler score, turbine score, and comprehensive professional score are displayed as module display data associated with the overall unit score.

[0009] As a preferred embodiment of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score as described in this invention, the trigger interface switching includes a selector element being the unit, which is displayed on the display surface in the first display mode.

[0010] The sub-selector elements are boiler, steam turbine, and integrated specialty.

[0011] When the selector element is switched to a sub-selector element by the input component, the control device generates an interface switching command, which switches the display from the first display mode to the second display mode, and calls the sub-score information corresponding to the current sub-selector element during the switching process.

[0012] As a preferred embodiment of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring described in this invention, the second display mode includes displaying sub-item scoring information and a return button on the display surface.

[0013] The sub-item scoring information includes sub-item scores and sub-module scores.

[0014] When the return button is triggered by the input component, the currently displayed sub-score information is collected and processed, and a return recovery command is generated.

[0015] As a preferred embodiment of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring described in this invention, the sub-item scoring includes: obtaining the sub-module score corresponding to the current sub-module, summarizing and calculating the sub-module scores according to the preset sub-module scoring relationship, and obtaining the sub-item score.

[0016] The submodule score is obtained by subtracting the deviation deduction and warning deduction corresponding to the submodule score from the base score.

[0017] As a preferred embodiment of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring described in this invention, the generation of return recovery instructions includes: generating return recovery instructions based on collected data; highlighting the corresponding sub-item scoring information after returning to the first display mode; and replacing and updating the corresponding data in the first display mode when a data update event is detected.

[0018] As a preferred embodiment of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring described in this invention, the data update event includes: when a change in the sub-item score is detected, calling the updated sub-item score information, replacing and updating the corresponding sub-item score information in the first display mode, and canceling the highlighting of the corresponding sub-item score information.

[0019] Another objective of this invention is to provide an interface interaction system for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring. This system can solve the problems of poor cross-interface continuity of scoring information, discontinuous return and recovery display, and asynchronous overview data with real-time evaluation results in current unit operation evaluation interface interaction technologies by switching between two display modes, displaying sub-scoring information, returning and restoring display, and linking data updates.

[0020] As a preferred embodiment of the interface interaction system of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in this invention, it includes an interface switching module, a sub-score display module, a return and recovery module, and a data update module.

[0021] The interface switching module is used to generate an interface switching instruction when the input component performs a switching operation on the selector element and the sub-selector element, so that the display surface switches from the first display mode to the second display mode and loads the corresponding sub-score information.

[0022] The sub-item scoring display module is used to display sub-item scoring information in the second display mode, including sub-item scores and sub-module scores, and organizes the score display content corresponding to the current sub-module according to the preset scoring relationship.

[0023] The return and recovery module is used to perform aggregation processing on the currently displayed sub-item scoring information, generate a return and recovery instruction, and after the display returns to the first display mode, highlight the corresponding sub-item scoring information.

[0024] The data update module is used to call the updated sub-score information after detecting a data update event, and replace the corresponding data in the first display mode to ensure that the returned overview data is consistent with the real-time evaluation results.

[0025] Another object of the present invention is to provide an interface interaction device for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor executes the computer program to implement the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score.

[0026] Another object of the present invention is to provide an interactive interface storage medium for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score, wherein a computer program is stored thereon, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the interactive interface method for the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score are implemented.

[0027] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: The interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring provided by this invention displays an overview of the overall unit score and associated sub-score information in a first display mode, and displays the sub-score information corresponding to the current sub-module in a second display mode. Combined with the corresponding data loading when switching interfaces, the aggregation and restoration when returning, and the replacement update triggered by data update events, it can achieve continuous display between the overall unit score and the sub-scores. This avoids the problems of score information disconnection after interface switching, inaccurate positioning after returning, and asynchronous display with real-time data in the prior art, thereby improving the display continuity, positioning accuracy, and real-time performance of unit operation evaluation information. Attached Figure Description

[0028] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings used in the following description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0029] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the interface interaction method of a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0030] Figure 2This is a schematic diagram of the overall unit score interface of a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0031] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the boiler scoring interface for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0032] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the turbine scoring interface of a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0033] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the comprehensive professional scoring interface of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0034] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the sub-item score return and recovery display of an interface interaction method for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0035] To make the above-mentioned objects, features, and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, specific embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of them. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort should fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

[0036] Example 1, referring to Figures 1-6 As an embodiment of the present invention, a user interface interaction method for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring is provided, comprising: In the first display mode 100, the overall rating overview of the unit and the associated sub-rating information 201 are displayed on the display surface M.

[0037] In the second display mode 200, the sub-item scoring information 201 is displayed on the display surface M, and a return button B is provided.

[0038] In response to switching selector element A to child selector element a, the interface is switched, causing the display surface M to switch from the first display mode 100 to the second display mode 200, and loading the sub-item rating information 201 corresponding to child selector element a.

[0039] In response to the triggering operation of the return button B, the display surface M returns to the first display mode 100, and the sub-selector element a corresponding to the current sub-item rating information 201 is displayed in association.

[0040] The first display mode 100 includes the control device C calling up the boiler score, turbine score and comprehensive professional score, and generating the unit total score 101 according to the preset total score relationship.

[0041] The overall unit score 101 is used as the main display data on display surface M in the first display mode 100, and the boiler score, turbine score, and comprehensive professional score are summarized and displayed as module display data associated with the overall unit score 101. Figure 2 As shown.

[0042] It should be noted that the first display mode 100 is used to provide an overview display of the unit level. After receiving a display request for the current unit, the control device C obtains the boiler score, turbine score, and comprehensive professional score corresponding to the unit. It then summarizes and calculates these scores according to a preset total score relationship to generate the current unit's total score 101. The total score 101 is generated by weighted summation of the boiler score, turbine score, and comprehensive professional score, with the weights for each score set to 0.40, 0.40, and 0.20, respectively. The boiler score, turbine score, and comprehensive professional score are multiplied by their respective weights and then summed to obtain the unit score. The total score is 101. The weights of the boiler score, turbine score, and comprehensive professional score are set to 0.40, 0.40, and 0.20, respectively. This makes the generation process of the total score 101 more consistent with the actual distribution of the impact of each professional aspect on the overall operating status of the unit. In particular, by setting the boiler score and turbine score to the same high weight, the contribution of the two main professional aspects to the total score 101 result is strengthened. By appropriately reducing the weight of the comprehensive professional score, the excessive amplification of the influence of auxiliary and comprehensive evaluation factors on the total score 101 is avoided, thus making the total score 101 result more targeted and accurate.

[0043] The trigger interface switching includes selecting element A as the unit and displaying it on display surface M in the first display mode 100.

[0044] The sub-selector element 'a' is for boilers, steam turbines, and integrated specialties.

[0045] When the selector element A is switched to the sub-selector element a by the input component S, the control device C generates an interface switching command, which switches the display surface M from the first display mode 100 to the second display mode 200, and calls the sub-item scoring information 201 corresponding to the current sub-selector element a during the switching process.

[0046] It should be noted that the trigger interface switching is used to achieve directional switching between the first display mode 100 and the second display mode 200. Selector element A is used to indicate that the current display object is the unit level and maintains the display state in the display surface M of the first display mode 100; sub-selector element a is used to indicate different sub-module categories under the unit level, including boiler, steam turbine and integrated specialization.

[0047] After receiving an operation from the input component S on selector element A in the first display mode 100, the control device C identifies whether the operation corresponds to a switching request for sub-selector element a. When a switching request is identified, the control device C reads the currently selected sub-selector element a and determines it as the current display category of the second display mode 200. After determining the current display category, the control device C generates an interface switching command and synchronously calls the sub-item scoring information 201 corresponding to the current sub-selector element a during the switching process from the first display mode 100 to the second display mode 200 on the display surface M. Specifically, when sub-selector element a is a boiler, the sub-item scoring information 201 corresponding to the boiler is called; when sub-selector element a is a steam turbine, the sub-item scoring information 201 corresponding to the steam turbine is called; and when sub-selector element a is a comprehensive specialty, the sub-item scoring information 201 corresponding to the comprehensive specialty is called. The sub-score information 201 is loaded as the current display content in the second display mode 200, so that the interface switching process and the score information calling process are kept synchronized, avoiding the need to perform data matching separately after the display mode is switched, and improving the display continuity and data correspondence when switching from the first display mode 100 to the second display mode 200.

[0048] It should also be noted that establishing a directional switching relationship between the unit level selection in the first display mode 100 and the sub-module rating 201b display in the second display mode 200, and synchronously calling the sub-item rating information 201 corresponding to the current sub-selector element a during the interface switching process, so that the interface switching action and the rating data loading action are coupled and executed, can enable different sub-modules such as boiler, turbine and comprehensive specialization to directly obtain the same rating content as the currently selected object when entering the detailed rating analysis from the overall unit overview. This avoids the display delay, data misalignment and discontinuity of analysis objects caused by the prior page jump and data matching in the existing technology, thereby improving the accuracy of rating information transmission between different display modes, the consistency of interface response, and the efficiency of directional analysis of target sub-modules during the unit operation evaluation process.

[0049] The second display mode 200 includes displaying sub-item scoring information 201 and a return button B on the display surface M.

[0050] The sub-item scoring information 201 includes sub-item scoring 201a and sub-module scoring 201b.

[0051] When the return button B is triggered by the input component S, the currently displayed sub-score information 201 is collected and processed, and a return recovery command is generated.

[0052] The sub-item scoring 201a includes obtaining the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the current sub-module, summarizing and calculating the sub-module score 201b according to the preset sub-module scoring relationship, and obtaining the sub-item score 201a.

[0053] The submodule score 201b is obtained by subtracting the deviation deduction and warning deduction corresponding to the submodule score 201b from the base score.

[0054] It should be noted that when sub-selector element a is a boiler, the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the boiler includes the boiler body system score, pulverizing system score, flue gas system score, and steam-water system score, such as... Figure 3 As shown, the boiler body system score represents the score result corresponding to the boiler body's operating status, the pulverizing system score represents the score result corresponding to the pulverizing system's operating status, the flue gas system score represents the score result corresponding to the flue gas system's operating status, and the steam-water system score represents the score result corresponding to the steam-water system's operating status. The sub-module score 201b corresponding to the boiler displays its respective deviation deduction and warning deduction.

[0055] Among them, deviation deduction is used to characterize the deduction value generated when the operating parameters of the corresponding system deviate from the preset range, and warning deduction is used to characterize the deduction value generated when the warning conditions are triggered. By associating the submodule score 201b of each boiler with its corresponding deviation deduction and warning deduction, users can simultaneously know the deduction status and score source of each boiler system when viewing the boiler professional score results.

[0056] In this embodiment, the value of the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the boiler is determined based on the total score and the corresponding deviation deduction and warning deduction. The sub-module score 201b corresponding to each boiler is obtained by deducting the deviation deduction and warning deduction corresponding to the sub-module score 201b of the boiler from the total score of 100. When the warning deduction is zero, the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the boiler is obtained by deducting the deviation deduction from the total score. When both the deviation deduction and the warning deduction are zero, the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the boiler remains at the total score of 100. This establishes a clear numerical correspondence between the sub-module score 201b of the boiler and the deviation deduction and warning deduction, thereby facilitating the itemized analysis of the boiler professional scoring results.

[0057] It should also be noted that the boiler-specific score 201a is generated by weighted summation of the boiler body system score, pulverizing system score, flue gas system score, and steam-water system score. The weights for these scores are 0.25, 0.20, 0.25, and 0.30, respectively. Each system score is multiplied by its corresponding weight and then summed to obtain the boiler-specific score 201a. This weighting ensures that the generation of the boiler-specific score 201a more closely reflects the differences in the impact of each subsystem on the overall boiler operation. Specifically, increasing the weight of the steam-water system score strengthens its contribution to the boiler-specific score 201a result; setting equal weights for the boiler body system score and the flue gas system score maintains a balance between the combustion process and the flue gas regulation process in the scoring; and appropriately reducing the weight of the pulverizing system score avoids excessive amplification of the overall boiler score due to fluctuations in auxiliary system scores, thus making the boiler-specific score 201a result more targeted and accurate.

[0058] When sub-selector element a is a steam turbine, the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the steam turbine includes the turbine body system score, main reheat steam and bypass system score, feedwater system score, condensate system score, heater system score, closed cooling water system score, and circulating water system score, such as... Figure 4 As shown, the sub-item score 201a corresponding to the steam turbine is used to characterize the scoring results corresponding to the operating status of the steam turbine itself; the main reheat steam and bypass system score is used to characterize the scoring results corresponding to the main reheat steam and bypass regulation links; the feedwater system score is used to characterize the scoring results corresponding to the operating status of the feedwater loop; the condensate system score is used to characterize the scoring results corresponding to the operating status of the condensate loop; the heater system score is used to characterize the scoring results corresponding to the operating status of the heater; the closed cooling water system score is used to characterize the scoring results corresponding to the operating status of the closed cooling water loop; and the circulating water system score is used to characterize the scoring results corresponding to the operating status of the circulating water loop. The sub-module scores 201b corresponding to each steam turbine respectively display their respective deviation deductions and warning deductions. The deviation deduction represents the deduction value generated when the operating parameters of the corresponding system deviate from the preset range, and the warning deduction represents the deduction value generated when the warning conditions are triggered. By associating the sub-module scores 201b corresponding to the steam turbine with their respective deviation deductions and warning deductions, the deduction status and scoring source of each steam turbine system can be obtained simultaneously when viewing the steam turbine professional scoring results.

[0059] It should also be noted that the sub-item score 201a corresponding to the steam turbine includes the scores for the steam turbine main system, the main reheat steam and bypass system, the feedwater system, the condensate system, the heater system, the closed cooling water system, and the circulating water system. The sub-item score 201a corresponding to the steam turbine can be expressed as the sum of the products of the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the steam turbine and their corresponding weights, where the sum of each weight is 1. A preferred scheme for the weights of the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the steam turbine is as follows: the weights for the steam turbine main system score and the main reheat steam and bypass system score are 0.20; the weights for the feedwater system score and the condensate system score are 0.15; and the weights for the heater system score, the closed cooling water system score, and the circulating water system score are 0.10.

[0060] The turbine main system and the main reheat steam and bypass system have a more direct impact on energy conversion efficiency, steam parameter stability, and the operating status of major equipment during turbine operation. Therefore, they are assigned a weight of 0.20 to enhance the contribution of these two key systems to the turbine's corresponding sub-item score 201a. The feedwater system and condensate system are closely related to the working fluid circulation process and provide strong support for the stable operation of the turbine's thermodynamic process. Therefore, they are assigned a weight of 0.15. The heater system, closed cooling water system, and circulating water system mainly play an auxiliary regulation and support role. Although they affect the turbine's operating status, their direct impact on the overall score is lower than that of the aforementioned key systems. Therefore, they are assigned a weight of 0.10. Through the above weighting configuration, the turbine's corresponding sub-item score 201a can better reflect the actual distribution of the impact of each subsystem on the overall economy and operational reliability of the turbine. This avoids the situation where the impact of key systems is weakened or the impact of auxiliary systems is amplified when using an equal weighting method. As a result, the turbine's corresponding sub-item score 201a results are more distinctive, reasonable, and have engineering guidance significance.

[0061] When sub-selector element a is a comprehensive specialty, the sub-module score 201b corresponding to the comprehensive specialty includes the unit comprehensive system score and the deviation deduction and warning deduction displayed corresponding to the unit comprehensive system score, such as... Figure 5 As shown, the unit integration system score is used to characterize the scoring results of the unit integration system. By linking the unit integration system score with its corresponding deviation deductions and warning deductions, users can simultaneously view the deduction details and scoring sources of the integrated professional scoring results, thus facilitating traceability analysis of the integrated professional scoring results.

[0062] It should also be noted that in the second display mode 200, the submodule score 201b is displayed in association with its corresponding deviation deduction and warning deduction, and a submodule score 201b is generated. Then, according to the differences in the impact of different subsystems on the overall operating status of the boiler and turbine, differentiated weights are set, and the submodule scores 201b are weighted and summarized to generate the sub-item score 201a. This allows the basis for the formation of each professional score to be directly linked to the specific subsystem and its deduction source, improving the traceability and interpretability of the score results, and making it easier for users to quickly locate the key links affecting the score. It can avoid the problem of the weakening of the impact of key systems or the amplification of the fluctuations of auxiliary systems when using equal weight summarization, making the generated sub-item score 201a more consistent with the actual impact distribution of the unit's economy and operational reliability, thereby improving the rationality, pertinence and engineering guidance value of the score results.

[0063] The process of generating a return recovery instruction includes generating a return recovery instruction based on the collected data, highlighting the corresponding sub-item score information 201 after returning to the first display mode 100, and replacing and updating the corresponding data in the first display mode 100 when a data update event is detected.

[0064] The data update event includes, when a change is detected in the sub-item score 201a, calling the updated sub-item score information 201, replacing and updating the corresponding sub-item score information 201 in the first display mode 100, and canceling the highlighting of the corresponding sub-item score information 201.

[0065] It should be noted that the aggregation processing is used to extract the sub-item score 201a result, the corresponding sub-module score 201b result, and the current display status information from the current sub-item score information 201, and generate aggregation data according to the overview display rules of the first display mode 100. The control device generates a return recovery instruction based on the aggregation data. The return recovery instruction includes at least mode switching parameters and display recovery parameters, which are used to control the display surface M to return from the second display mode 200 to the first display mode 100, and to perform highlighting display on the data object corresponding to the current sub-item score information 201 in the first display mode 100, such as... Figure 6 As shown, this allows users to directly locate the current analysis content in the overall unit score overview after completing the sub-analysis, maintaining the continuity of analysis between the previous and next interfaces.

[0066] Example 2, an embodiment of the present invention, provides an interface interaction system for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, including an interface switching module, a sub-scoring display module, a return and recovery module, and a data update module.

[0067] Among them: the interface switching module is used to generate an interface switching instruction when the input component S performs a switching operation on the selector element A and the sub-selector element a, so that the display surface M switches from the first display mode 100 to the second display mode 200 and loads the corresponding sub-item scoring information 201.

[0068] The sub-item rating display module is used to display sub-item rating information 201 in the second display mode 200, including sub-item rating 201a and sub-module rating 201b, and organize the rating display content corresponding to the current sub-module according to the preset rating relationship.

[0069] The return and recovery module is used to perform aggregation processing on the currently displayed sub-item rating information 201, generate a return and recovery instruction, so that after the display surface M returns to the first display mode 100, the corresponding sub-item rating information 201 will be highlighted.

[0070] The data update module is used to call the updated sub-score information 201 after detecting a data update event, and replace the corresponding data in the first display mode 100 to ensure that the returned overview data is consistent with the real-time evaluation results.

[0071] This embodiment also provides a computer device, including a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, it implements an interface interaction system for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as proposed in the above embodiment.

[0072] This embodiment also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program thereon. When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements an interface interaction system for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as proposed in the above embodiment.

[0073] If a function is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this invention, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or a part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of this invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0074] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a processor-including system, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0075] More specific examples of computer-readable media (a non-exhaustive list) include: electrical connections (electronic devices) having one or more wires, portable computer disk drives (magnetic devices), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Furthermore, computer-readable media can even be paper or other suitable media on which the program can be printed, because the program can be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in computer memory.

[0076] It should be understood that various parts of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented in software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or a combination of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.

[0077] It should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and not to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications or equivalent substitutions can be made to the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention, and all such modifications or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A user interface interaction method for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, characterized in that, include: In the first display mode (100), an overall rating overview of the unit and related sub-rating information are displayed on the display surface (M) (201). In the second display mode (200), the sub-item scoring information (201) is displayed on the display surface (M), and a return button (B) is provided. In response to switching the selector element (A) to the sub-selector element (a), the interface is switched, the display surface (M) is switched from the first display mode (100) to the second display mode (200), and the sub-item rating information (201) corresponding to the sub-selector element (a) is loaded. In response to the triggering operation of the return button (B), the display surface (M) returns to the first display mode (100), and the sub-selector element (a) corresponding to the current sub-item rating information (201) is displayed in association.

2. The interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in claim 1, characterized in that: The first display mode (100) includes the control device (C) calling the boiler score, turbine score and comprehensive professional score, and generating the unit total score (101) according to the preset total score relationship. The unit's total score (101) is used as the main display data of the display surface (M) in the first display mode (100), and the boiler score, turbine score and comprehensive professional score are summarized and displayed as module display data associated with the unit's total score (101).

3. The interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in claim 1, characterized in that: The trigger interface switching includes the selector element (A) being the unit, which is displayed on the display surface (M) in the first display mode (100); The sub-selector element (a) is for boilers, steam turbines, and integrated specialties; When the selector element (A) is switched to the sub-selector element (a) by the input component (S), the control device (C) generates an interface switching instruction to switch the display surface (M) from the first display mode (100) to the second display mode (200), and calls the sub-item scoring information (201) corresponding to the current sub-selector element (a) during the switching process.

4. The interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in claim 1 or 3, characterized in that: The second display mode (200) includes displaying sub-scoring information (201) and a return button (B) on the display surface (M); The itemized scoring information (201) includes itemized scoring (201a) and sub-module scoring (201b); When the return button (B) is triggered by the input component (S), the currently displayed sub-score information (201) is collected and processed, and a return recovery command is generated.

5. The interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in claim 4, characterized in that: The sub-item scoring (201a) includes obtaining the sub-module score (201b) corresponding to the current sub-module, summarizing and calculating the sub-module score (201b) according to the preset sub-module scoring relationship, and obtaining the sub-item score (201a). The submodule score (201b) is obtained by subtracting the deviation deduction and warning deduction corresponding to the submodule score (201b) from the base score.

6. The interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in claim 4, characterized in that: The generation of the return recovery instruction includes generating a return recovery instruction based on the collected data, highlighting the corresponding sub-item scoring information (201) after returning to the first display mode (100), and replacing and updating the corresponding data in the first display mode (100) when a data update event is detected.

7. The interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in any one of claims 1, 2, and 6, characterized in that: The data update event includes, when a change in the sub-item score (201a) is detected, calling the updated sub-item score information (201), replacing and updating the corresponding sub-item score information (201) in the first display mode (100), and canceling the highlighting of the corresponding sub-item score information (201).

8. A user interface system for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring, employing the user interface method for a unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability scoring as described in any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that: This includes a screen switching module, a sub-score display module, a return and recovery module, and a data update module; The interface switching module is used to generate an interface switching instruction when the input component (S) performs a switching operation on the selector element (A) and the sub-selector element (a), so that the display surface (M) switches from the first display mode (100) to the second display mode (200) and loads the corresponding sub-item scoring information (201). The sub-item rating display module is used to display sub-item rating information (201) in the second display mode (200), including sub-item rating (201a) and sub-module rating (201b), and organize the rating display content corresponding to the current sub-module according to the preset rating relationship; The return and recovery module is used to perform aggregation processing on the currently displayed sub-item scoring information (201), generate a return and recovery instruction, and after the display surface returns to the first display mode (100), the corresponding sub-item scoring information (201) will be highlighted. The data update module is used to call the updated sub-item scoring information (201) after detecting a data update event, and replace and update the corresponding data in the first display mode (100) to ensure that the returned overview data is consistent with the real-time evaluation results.

9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, characterized in that, When the processor executes the computer program, it implements the steps of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the interface interaction method of the unit operation evaluation system based on economic reliability score as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images