A multi-dimensional index-based daily plan management and control maturity assessment method and system

CN122529563APending Publication Date: 2026-08-07SICHUAN HUANENG FUJIANG HYDROPOWER CO LTD
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
SICHUAN HUANENG FUJIANG HYDROPOWER CO LTD
Filing Date
2026-05-21
Publication Date
2026-08-07

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

在传统的日计划管理实践中,管理者往往依赖单一指标如计划完成率来衡量当日工作成效,这种评估方式虽然操作简便,但难以全面反映日计划管理在执行合规性、完成效率与计划质量等多个维度的真实水平

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN122529563A_ABST
    Figure CN122529563A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The embodiment of the specification provides a day plan management and control maturity evaluation method and system based on multi-dimensional indexes, wherein the method comprises the following steps: obtaining day plan task data of a target object, the day plan task data comprising quantity information of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the day, cancelled tasks and newly added temporary tasks on the day; calculating a plurality of basic indexes based on the day plan task data, the basic indexes comprising a plan execution rate, a plan completion rate, a plan on-time completion rate, a start completion rate, a start on-time completion rate, a cancellation rate and a temporary plan rate; calculating a day plan management and control maturity index through multi-dimensional weighted integration based on the plurality of basic indexes; the multi-dimensions comprising an execution compliance dimension, a completion efficiency dimension and a plan quality and stability dimension; and outputting a day plan management and control maturity evaluation result according to the day plan management and control maturity index.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This document relates to the field of information processing technology, and in particular to a method and system for assessing the maturity of daily planning and management based on multi-dimensional indicators. Background Technology

[0002] As enterprises continuously improve their level of refined management, daily planning management, as a key link connecting strategic goals and daily execution, directly impacts the organization's operational efficiency and goal achievement rate. In traditional daily planning management practices, managers often rely on a single indicator, such as the plan completion rate, to measure the day's work performance. While this evaluation method is simple to operate, it is difficult to comprehensively reflect the true level of daily planning management across multiple dimensions, including execution compliance, completion efficiency, and plan quality.

[0003] In existing technologies, some management systems attempt to introduce multiple evaluation indicators, such as plan execution rate and plan deviation rate. However, these indicators are usually isolated and lack an organic integration mechanism. Managers need to review data from multiple indicators separately to form a comprehensive judgment, resulting in low evaluation efficiency and high subjectivity. Furthermore, existing solutions often treat canceled or ad-hoc tasks the same as normally executed tasks, leading to distorted evaluation results. More critically, existing technologies lack a unified index that can comprehensively quantify the maturity of daily plan management, making it difficult to conduct horizontal comparisons and vertical tracking of daily plan management levels across different departments and time periods, and hindering clear guidance for management improvement.

[0004] Therefore, how to construct a scientific, comprehensive, and quantifiable daily planning management maturity assessment system to achieve a comprehensive evaluation of daily planning management in three dimensions: execution compliance, completion efficiency, and planning quality has become a technical problem that urgently needs to be solved by those skilled in the art. Summary of the Invention

[0005] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a method for assessing the maturity of daily planning and management based on multidimensional indicators, characterized by including: S1. Obtain the daily planned task data of the target object, wherein the daily planned task data includes information on the number of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, canceled tasks, and newly added temporary tasks on the same day; S2. Based on the daily planned task data, calculate multiple basic indicators, including plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate; S3. Based on the aforementioned multiple basic indicators, calculate the daily plan management maturity index through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension; S4. Based on the daily plan management maturity index, output the daily plan management maturity assessment result.

[0006] Furthermore, the plan execution rate is determined based on the ratio of the sum of executed and cancelled tasks to the number of approved tasks. This rate is used to measure the closed-loop management of approved tasks being executed or explicitly cancelled. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where ER is the plan execution rate, ST is the number of executed tasks, CT is the number of canceled tasks, and AT is the number of approved tasks.

[0007] Furthermore, the plan completion rate is the number of completed tasks C. m The overall completion status of approved tasks is calculated by comparing the total number of approved tasks (AT) with the total number of approved tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where CR represents the plan completion rate, and C m AT represents the number of completed tasks and AT represents the number of approved tasks. The on-time completion rate of the plan is the number of tasks completed that day (C). sd The ratio of the number of approved tasks (AT) is used to calculate the completion efficiency of the evaluated tasks within the scheduled date. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where OCR represents the on-time completion rate of the plan, C sd This represents the number of tasks completed that day, and AT represents the number of approved tasks.

[0008] Furthermore, the commencement completion rate is determined based on the ratio of the number of completed tasks to the difference between the number of approved tasks and the number of cancelled tasks. This ratio is used to determine the final completion quality of the commenced tasks after excluding cancelled tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where SCR is the start-up completion rate, and C is the completion rate. m AT represents the number of completed tasks, CT represents the number of approved tasks, and CT represents the number of cancelled tasks. The on-time completion rate is determined by the ratio of the number of tasks completed on time to the difference between the number of approved tasks and the number of cancelled tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where SOTR is the on-time completion rate, C sd This represents the number of tasks completed that day, AT represents the number of approved tasks, and CT represents the number of canceled tasks.

[0009] Furthermore, the cancellation rate is determined based on the ratio of the number of cancelled tasks to the number of approved tasks, and is calculated as follows: ; Where CaR is the cancellation rate, CT is the number of cancelled tasks, and AT is the number of approved tasks; The temporary planning rate is calculated as follows: ; Where APR is the provisional planning rate, A h This represents the number of new temporary tasks added on the day, while AT represents the number of approved tasks.

[0010] Furthermore, the calculation method for the daily plan management maturity index is as follows: ; in, To implement compliance scoring; To achieve the efficiency score; The score represents the quality and stability of the plan; α, β, and γ are the weight coefficients of the corresponding dimensions, and α+β+γ=1; The execution compliance score The score is directly based on the calculated plan execution rate (ER). The completion efficiency score The score is directly based on the SCR (Start-up Completion Rate) value. The plan quality and stability score The cancellation rate (CaR) and the provisional booking rate (APR) are calculated using the following method: ; Furthermore, the step of outputting the daily plan management maturity assessment result based on the daily plan management maturity index includes: The maturity level of daily plan management is divided into multiple levels based on the preset maturity level thresholds, including initial level, basic level, standard level, optimized level and excellent level; The calculated daily plan management maturity index is compared with the preset maturity level threshold, and the corresponding maturity level assessment result is output.

[0011] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a daily planning and management maturity assessment system based on multi-dimensional indicators, characterized in that it includes: Data acquisition module: used to acquire daily planned task data of the target object. The daily planned task data includes information on the number of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, canceled tasks, and newly added temporary tasks on the same day. Indicator Calculation Module: Used to calculate multiple basic indicators based on the daily planned task data. The multiple basic indicators include plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate. Maturity assessment module: used to calculate the daily plan management maturity index based on the aforementioned multiple basic indicators through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension; Results output module: Used to output the daily plan management maturity assessment results based on the daily plan management maturity index.

[0012] This specification provides one or more embodiments of an electronic device, including: Processor; and, A memory is configured to store computer-executable instructions, which, when executed, cause the processor to implement the steps of the above-described daily planning and control maturity assessment method based on multidimensional indicators.

[0013] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a storage medium for storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed, implement the steps of the above-described daily plan management maturity assessment method based on multi-dimensional indicators.

[0014] By adopting the embodiments of the present invention, the entire process from data collection, indicator calculation, maturity assessment to result output is automated, which greatly improves the assessment efficiency and the objectivity of the assessment results, enabling managers to grasp the daily plan management maturity status in real time without manually collecting data and calculating indicators.

[0015] The above description is merely an overview of the technical solution of the present invention. In order to better understand the technical means of the present invention and to implement it in accordance with the contents of the specification, and in order to make the above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, specific embodiments of the present invention are described below. Attached Figure Description

[0016] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in one or more embodiments of this specification or in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments recorded in this specification. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0017] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a daily planning and control maturity assessment method based on multidimensional indicators, provided for one or more embodiments of this specification; Figure 2 A schematic diagram illustrating the composition of a daily planning and control maturity assessment system based on multidimensional indicators, provided for one or more embodiments of this specification; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided for one or more embodiments of this specification. Detailed Implementation

[0018] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in one or more embodiments of this specification, the technical solutions in one or more embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of this specification, and not all of the embodiments. Based on one or more embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort should fall within the protection scope of this document.

[0019] Method Implementation Examples According to embodiments of the present invention, a method for assessing the maturity of daily planning and management based on multi-dimensional indicators is provided. Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a daily planning and control maturity assessment method based on multidimensional indicators, provided for one or more embodiments of this specification, is shown below. Figure 1 As shown, the daily planning and management maturity assessment method based on multi-dimensional indicators according to an embodiment of the present invention specifically includes: S1. Obtain the daily planned task data of the target object. The daily planned task data includes the number of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, canceled tasks, and newly added temporary tasks on the same day.

[0020] Among them, the number of approved tasks refers to the total number of tasks confirmed and included in the daily plan management after the approval process on that day; the number of executed tasks refers to the number of tasks actually started and executed on that day, reflecting the task initiation status; the number of cancelled tasks refers to the number of tasks that have been officially cancelled and executed on that day, usually due to reasons such as plan changes, insufficient resources, or task merging; the number of completed tasks refers to the total number of tasks that have been completed as of the evaluation time, regardless of whether their completion time is on the same day; the number of tasks completed on the same day refers to the number of tasks completed only on the same day and not carried over to the next day; and the number of newly added temporary tasks on the same day refers to the number of temporary tasks newly added after the plan approval on that day. By collecting the above six types of basic data, complete data support is provided for the subsequent calculation of multi-dimensional indicators.

[0021] S2. Based on the daily planned task data, calculate multiple basic indicators, including plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate.

[0022] The plan execution rate is determined by the ratio of the sum of executed and cancelled tasks to the number of approved tasks. It is used to measure the closed-loop management of approved tasks being executed or explicitly cancelled. The calculation method is as follows: ; Here, ER represents the plan execution rate, ST represents the number of executed tasks, CT represents the number of canceled tasks, and AT represents the number of approved tasks. The target for the plan execution rate is 100%. Failure to achieve this target is considered a failure to fulfill responsibilities, and the corresponding accountability will be assessed.

[0023] The plan completion rate is the number of completed tasks C. m The overall completion status of approved tasks is calculated by comparing the total number of approved tasks (AT) with the total number of approved tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where CR represents the plan completion rate, and C m The number of tasks completed is AT, and the number of tasks approved is AT. The planned completion rate does not distinguish between task completion time and is suitable for evaluating the cumulative completion status of tasks over a longer period.

[0024] The on-time completion rate of the plan is the number of tasks completed that day (C). sd The ratio of the number of approved tasks (AT) is used to calculate the completion efficiency of the evaluated tasks within the scheduled date. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where OCR represents the on-time completion rate of the plan, C sd This represents the number of tasks completed that day, and AT represents the number of approved tasks.

[0025] The commencement completion rate is determined by dividing the number of completed tasks by the difference between the number of approved tasks and the number of cancelled tasks. It is used to assess the final completion quality of commenced tasks after excluding cancelled tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where SCR is the start-up completion rate, and C is the completion rate. m AT represents the number of completed tasks, CT represents the number of approved tasks, and CT represents the number of cancelled tasks. The on-time completion rate is determined by the ratio of the number of tasks completed on time to the difference between the number of approved tasks and the number of cancelled tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where SOTR is the on-time completion rate, C sd This represents the number of tasks completed that day, AT represents the number of approved tasks, and CT represents the number of canceled tasks.

[0026] The cancellation rate is determined based on the ratio of the number of cancelled tasks to the number of approved tasks, and is calculated as follows: ; Where CaR is the cancellation rate, CT is the number of cancelled tasks, and AT is the number of approved tasks; a higher cancellation rate indicates that the predictions of task feasibility and resource matching during the planning stage are less accurate.

[0027] The temporary plan rate is the ratio of newly added temporary tasks to the number of approved tasks on a given day, measuring the proportion of newly added temporary tasks to the total plan. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where APR is the provisional planning rate, A h This represents the number of new temporary tasks added on the day, while AT represents the number of approved tasks.

[0028] S3. Based on the aforementioned multiple basic indicators, calculate the daily plan management maturity index through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension.

[0029] The calculation method for the daily plan management maturity index is as follows: ; in, To implement compliance scoring; To achieve the efficiency score; The score represents the quality and stability of the plan; α, β, and γ are the weight coefficients of the corresponding dimensions, and α+β+γ=1; The execution compliance score The score is directly based on the calculated plan execution rate (ER). The completion efficiency score The score is directly based on the SCR (Start-up Completion Rate) value. The plan quality and stability score The cancellation rate (CaR) and the provisional booking rate (APR) are calculated using the following method: .

[0030] S4. Based on the daily plan management maturity index, output the daily plan management maturity assessment result.

[0031] The daily planning and management maturity index has a value range of [0,1]. A higher value indicates a higher level of maturity in daily planning and management. Based on preset maturity level thresholds, the maturity of daily planning and management is divided into multiple levels, including initial, basic, standard, optimized, and excellent levels. The calculated daily planning and management maturity index is compared with the preset maturity level thresholds, and the corresponding maturity level assessment result is output.

[0032] In one embodiment, a real-time data collection and monitoring mechanism for daily planned tasks is established. When the plan execution rate falls below a preset threshold, an early warning is automatically triggered. This early warning mechanism monitors the trend of the plan execution rate in real time and promptly sends a warning message to managers when the rate drops below the management target value, indicating the risk of unfulfilled tasks or untimely responses, prompting managers to intervene and investigate the causes. When the cancellation rate or the rate of ad-hoc tasks exceeds a preset threshold, plan quality analysis and optimization suggestions are automatically generated.

[0033] In one embodiment, the weighting coefficients are dynamically optimized and adjusted based on historical daily task data. This dynamic optimization employs principal component analysis (PCA) or analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to adaptively adjust the weight allocation of the execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension based on the contribution of each basic indicator in historical data to the effectiveness of daily task management. PCA performs dimensionality reduction on historical indicator data, extracts the principal components with the greatest impact on the effectiveness of daily task management, determines the relative importance of each basic indicator based on its loading in the principal components, and then adjusts the weights of the corresponding dimensions. AHP constructs a hierarchical model, invites management experts to compare the relative importance of the three dimensions pairwise, constructs a judgment matrix, and calculates eigenvectors to obtain the weight allocation for each dimension. By dynamically optimizing the weighting coefficients, the daily task management maturity assessment becomes more aligned with the organization's actual management needs.

[0034] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: The daily planning and management maturity assessment method automates the entire process from data collection, indicator calculation, maturity assessment to result output, significantly improving assessment efficiency and the objectivity of assessment results. This allows managers to monitor the daily planning and management maturity status in real time without having to manually collect data and calculate indicators.

[0035] System Implementation Examples According to embodiments of the present invention, a daily planning and management maturity assessment system based on multi-dimensional indicators is provided. Figure 2 A schematic diagram illustrating the composition of a daily planning and control maturity assessment system based on multidimensional indicators, provided for one or more embodiments of this specification, is shown below. Figure 2 As shown, the daily planning and management maturity assessment system based on multi-dimensional indicators according to an embodiment of the present invention specifically includes: Data acquisition module 20: used to acquire daily planned task data of the target object, the daily planned task data including approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, cancelled tasks, and the number of new temporary tasks added on the same day; Indicator calculation module 22: used to calculate multiple basic indicators based on the daily planned task data, including plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate; Maturity assessment module 24: is used to calculate the daily plan management maturity index based on the multiple basic indicators through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension; Result output module 26: Used to output the daily plan management maturity assessment result based on the daily plan management maturity index.

[0036] The embodiments of the present invention are system embodiments corresponding to the above method embodiments. The specific operation of each module can be understood by referring to the description of the method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0037] Device Example 1 This invention provides an electronic device, such as... Figure 3 As shown, it includes: a memory 30, a processor 32, and a computer program stored in the memory 30 and executable on the processor 32. When the computer program is executed by the processor 32, it performs the following method steps: S1. Obtain the daily planned task data of the target object, wherein the daily planned task data includes information on the number of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, canceled tasks, and newly added temporary tasks on the same day; S2. Based on the daily planned task data, calculate multiple basic indicators, including plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate; S3. Based on the aforementioned multiple basic indicators, calculate the daily plan management maturity index through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension; S4. Based on the daily plan management maturity index, output the daily plan management maturity assessment result.

[0038] Device Example 2 This invention provides a computer-readable storage medium storing an information transmission implementation program. When executed by a processor 32, the program performs the following method steps: S1. Obtain the daily planned task data of the target object, wherein the daily planned task data includes information on the number of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, canceled tasks, and newly added temporary tasks on the same day; S2. Based on the daily planned task data, calculate multiple basic indicators, including plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate; S3. Based on the aforementioned multiple basic indicators, calculate the daily plan management maturity index through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension; S4. Based on the daily plan management maturity index, output the daily plan management maturity assessment result.

[0039] The computer-readable storage media described in this embodiment include, but are not limited to, ROM, RAM, disk, or optical disk.

[0040] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, and not to limit them; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications can still be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalent substitutions can be made to some or all of the technical features; and these modifications or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for assessing the maturity of daily planning and management based on multi-dimensional indicators, characterized in that, include: S1. Obtain the daily planned task data of the target object, wherein the daily planned task data includes information on the number of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, canceled tasks, and newly added temporary tasks on the same day; S2. Based on the daily planned task data, calculate multiple basic indicators, including plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate; S3. Based on the aforementioned multiple basic indicators, calculate the daily plan management maturity index through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension; S4. Based on the daily plan management maturity index, output the daily plan management maturity assessment result.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The plan execution rate is determined by the ratio of the sum of executed and cancelled tasks to the number of approved tasks. It is used to measure the closed-loop management of approved tasks being executed or explicitly cancelled. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where ER is the plan execution rate, ST is the number of executed tasks, CT is the number of canceled tasks, and AT is the number of approved tasks.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The plan completion rate is the number of completed tasks C. m The overall completion status of approved tasks is calculated by comparing the total number of approved tasks (AT) with the total number of approved tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where CR represents the plan completion rate, and C m AT represents the number of completed tasks and AT represents the number of approved tasks. The on-time completion rate of the plan is the number of tasks completed that day (C). sd The ratio of the number of approved tasks (AT) is used to calculate the completion efficiency of the evaluated tasks within the scheduled date. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where OCR represents the on-time completion rate of the plan, C sd This represents the number of tasks completed that day, and AT represents the number of approved tasks.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The commencement completion rate is determined by dividing the number of completed tasks by the difference between the number of approved tasks and the number of cancelled tasks. It is used to assess the final completion quality of commenced tasks after excluding cancelled tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where SCR is the start-up completion rate, and C is the completion rate. m AT represents the number of completed tasks, CT represents the number of approved tasks, and CT represents the number of cancelled tasks. The on-time completion rate is determined by the ratio of the number of tasks completed on time to the difference between the number of approved tasks and the number of cancelled tasks. The calculation method is as follows: ; Where SOTR is the on-time completion rate, C sd This represents the number of tasks completed that day. AT represents the number of approved tasks, and CT represents the number of canceled tasks.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The cancellation rate is determined based on the ratio of the number of cancelled tasks to the number of approved tasks, and is calculated as follows: ; Where CaR is the cancellation rate, CT is the number of cancelled tasks, and AT is the number of approved tasks; The temporary planning rate is calculated as follows: ; Where APR is the provisional planning rate, A h This represents the number of new temporary tasks added on the day, while AT represents the number of approved tasks.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The calculation method for the daily plan management maturity index is as follows: ; in, To implement compliance scoring; To achieve the efficiency score; The score represents the quality and stability of the plan; α, β, and γ are the weight coefficients of the corresponding dimensions, and α+β+γ=1; The execution compliance score The score is directly based on the calculated plan execution rate (ER). The completion efficiency score The score is directly based on the SCR (Start-up Completion Rate) value. The plan quality and stability score The cancellation rate (CaR) and the provisional booking rate (APR) are calculated using the following method: 。 7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of outputting the daily plan management maturity assessment result based on the daily plan management maturity index includes: The maturity level of daily plan management is divided into multiple levels based on the preset maturity level thresholds, including initial level, basic level, standard level, optimized level and excellent level; The calculated daily plan management maturity index is compared with the preset maturity level threshold, and the corresponding maturity level assessment result is output.

8. A daily planning and management maturity assessment system based on multi-dimensional indicators, characterized in that, include: Data acquisition module: used to acquire daily planned task data of the target object. The daily planned task data includes information on the number of approved tasks, executed tasks, completed tasks, tasks completed on the same day, canceled tasks, and newly added temporary tasks on the same day. Indicator Calculation Module: Used to calculate multiple basic indicators based on the daily planned task data. The multiple basic indicators include plan execution rate, plan completion rate, plan on-time completion rate, commencement completion rate, commencement on-time completion rate, cancellation rate, and temporary plan rate. Maturity assessment module: used to calculate the daily plan management maturity index based on the aforementioned multiple basic indicators through multi-dimensional weighted integration; the multiple dimensions include execution compliance dimension, completion efficiency dimension, and plan quality and stability dimension; Results output module: Used to output the daily plan management maturity assessment results based on the daily plan management maturity index.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: processor; as well as, A memory configured to store computer-executable instructions, which, when executed, cause the processor to implement the steps of the daily planning and control maturity assessment method based on multidimensional indicators as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A storage medium, characterized in that, Used to store computer-executable instructions, which, when executed, implement the steps of the daily planning and control maturity assessment method based on multidimensional indicators as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.