A method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for advancing a status reporting process.

Abstract

This application discloses a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for advancing a status report process, relating to the field of nuclear power engineering technology. The method includes: automatically generating a status report based on the job type in response to a work application process entering the approval completion state; obtaining the associated equipment criticality classification and processing priority; determining the target level and initial process state of the status report based on preset classification mapping rules; setting the initial state of low-level status reports to the issuance state, establishing a status linkage mechanism between the low-level status report and the work application process; monitoring changes in the work application process status, and automatically advancing the status report to the completion state when the process enters the termination state. This application can solve the problems of high labor costs, low efficiency, and easy omissions and process delays caused by relying on manual processes throughout the status report process, achieving automated advancement of the status report process, and improving the efficiency of nuclear power plant status report management and the operational standardization of the experience feedback system.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of nuclear power engineering technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus, electronic device and storage medium for advancing a status reporting process. Background Technology

[0002] During the construction and operation of nuclear power plants, a large number of work applications for fault repair and defect maintenance are generated. The corresponding status reports are the core carrier of the nuclear power plant's experience feedback system. In related technologies, the generation, classification, and overall process of status reports largely rely on manual labor, which is not only costly but also prone to omissions, classification errors, and process delays. Especially for the large number of low-level defect and fault maintenance status reports, the fully manual management model is inefficient and cannot achieve automated linkage between the status report process and the front-end work application process. It is also difficult to adapt to the large-scale and standardized experience feedback management needs of nuclear power plants, thus hindering the improvement of the operational efficiency of the nuclear power plant's experience feedback system. Summary of the Invention

[0003] This application provides a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for advancing a status report process. It addresses the problems in related technologies where the generation, classification, and advancement of status reports all rely on manual operation, leading to high labor costs, low process efficiency, and a tendency for omissions and delays in reporting.

[0004] According to a first aspect of this application, a method for advancing a status reporting process is provided, comprising:

[0005] S1, in response to the work application process entering the approval completion state, automatically generate the corresponding status report according to the job type of the work application, and obtain the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type; S2, based on the preset hierarchical mapping rules, determine the target level and initial process status of the status report according to the operation type, equipment criticality level and processing priority; S3, when the target level is low, set the initial process status of the status report to the issuance status, and establish a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process; S4. Monitor the status changes of the work application process. When the work application process is detected to have entered the termination state, automatically advance the process status reported by the status linkage mechanism to the end state.

[0006] According to a second aspect of this application, a status reporting process advancement device is provided, comprising: The response module is configured to automatically generate a corresponding status report based on the job type of the job application when the work application process enters the approval completion state, and obtain the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type. The determination module is configured to determine the target level and initial process status of the status report based on a preset hierarchical mapping rule, according to the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority. The module is configured to set the initial process status of the status report to the issuance status when the target level is low, and to establish a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process. The monitoring module is configured to monitor the status changes of the work application process. When the work application process is detected to have entered the termination state, the module automatically advances the status of the reported process to the end state according to the status linkage mechanism.

[0007] According to a third aspect of this application, an electronic device is provided, comprising: At least one processor; and memory that is communicatively connected to at least one processor; The memory stores instructions that can be executed by at least one processor, which enables the at least one processor to execute the status reporting process advancement method described in the first aspect above.

[0008] According to a fourth aspect of this application, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions is provided, wherein the computer instructions are used to cause a computer to execute the status reporting process advancement method described in the first aspect above.

[0009] According to a fifth aspect of this application, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the status reporting process advancement method as described in the first aspect above.

[0010] This application enables the automatic generation of corresponding status reports after the work application process is approved. Based on the work type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority, the status reports are automatically classified and the initial process status is configured using preset classification mapping rules. For low-level status reports, a status linkage mechanism with the work application process is established, and the status reports are automatically advanced to the end state according to the status changes of the work application process. Therefore, it can solve the problems in related technologies where the generation, classification, and process advancement of status reports all rely on manual operation, resulting in high labor costs, low process operation efficiency, and easy omissions in filling and process advancement. This achieves the technical effect of automating the status report process of nuclear power plants, significantly reducing human control costs, and significantly improving the efficiency of status report management and the standardization and timeliness of the nuclear power plant experience feedback system.

[0011] It should be understood that the description in this section is not intended to identify key or essential features of the embodiments of this application, nor is it intended to limit the scope of this application. Other features of this application will become readily apparent from the following description. Attached Figure Description

[0012] To more clearly illustrate the embodiments of this application, the accompanying drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0013] Figure 1 A schematic flowchart illustrating a status report process advancement method provided in an embodiment of this application; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a status reporting process advancement device provided in an embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0014] The following description, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrates exemplary embodiments of this application, including various details to aid understanding. These should be considered merely exemplary. Therefore, those skilled in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications can be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the scope and spirit of this application. Similarly, for clarity and brevity, descriptions of well-known functions and structures are omitted in the following description.

[0015] The status report process advancement method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium of this application are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0016] Example 1 Figure 1 This is a flowchart of an automatic advancement method for a nuclear power plant status report management process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0017] like Figure 1 As shown, the automated process for managing the status report of a nuclear power plant includes the following steps: S1, in response to the work application process entering the approval completion state, automatically generate the corresponding status report according to the job type of the work application, and obtain the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type.

[0018] In the automated approach to the nuclear power plant status report management process, the core of the post-approval processing stage of work applications lies in establishing an automated status report generation and parameter acquisition mechanism based on process event triggers. This step monitors the lifecycle status of the work application process, identifies the specific event of entering the approval completion state, and then initiates the instantiation and generation process of the status report. During this process, the system dynamically constructs the corresponding status report object based on the job type attribute of the work application, ensuring the consistency of the report content with the source business. Simultaneously, this step also includes an automated extraction process of the technical characteristics of associated equipment, that is, parsing key parameters of equipment criticality classification and processing priority from the work application or its associated equipment ledger. These parameters, as the basis for subsequent process decisions, are captured in real time and bound to the newly generated status report, thus providing complete data input for subsequent classification determination and process advancement. As a specific implementation method, when a work application is of the fault repair or defect repair type and is completed at the approval node, the system can automatically generate a status report and mark the "work application" as the generation method. At the same time, it can read the criticality level of the system equipment under this work type, such as critical level 1, critical level 2, non-critical equipment or equipment to be repaired, as well as the priority value representing the urgency level, as an application example of this step.

[0019] This step, through automation, enables the instant generation of status reports and the seamless acquisition of key parameters, eliminating the lag and errors of manual entry, ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of experience feedback data sources, and laying a solid data foundation for the subsequent intelligent hierarchical management of status reports and the automatic advancement of processes.

[0020] S2, based on the preset hierarchical mapping rules, determine the target level and initial process status of the status report according to the job type, equipment criticality level and processing priority.

[0021] The core of determining the target level and initial process status of status reports based on preset hierarchical mapping rules lies in constructing a multi-dimensional decision logic model. This model takes the job type of the work application, the criticality level of the associated equipment, and the priority of fault handling as input variables, and outputs the corresponding management level and process start node through predefined mapping relationships. Essentially, this hierarchical mapping rule is a mechanism that comprehensively evaluates equipment importance, fault urgency, and the nature of maintenance work. It aims to automatically match differentiated management strategies based on the scope of risk impact, thereby achieving intelligent classification and process initialization of status reports. Under this overarching concept, the specific mapping logic can take various forms, such as lookup table methods, rule engine judgment, or function calculation, as long as the target level and initial process status can be uniquely determined based on the combined characteristics of the above three dimensions. As a specific implementation method, the job type can be set to only be for fault repair and defect repair, the criticality level can cover multiple levels from critical sensitive equipment to operating and repaired equipment, the priority can be distinguished from very urgent to non-urgent, and a mapping table containing all dimension combinations and corresponding results can be pre-configured; for example, when the job type is fault repair, the criticality level is the highest level and the priority is very urgent, the mapping rule outputs a higher target level and sets the initial process status to pending issuance, while when the criticality level is lower or the priority is not high, a lower target level is output and the initial process status is directly set to the issuance status, and the generation method field of low-level reports is marked as unmodifiable.

[0022] By adopting a hierarchical mapping rule based on multidimensional features, this step can eliminate the subjectivity and lag of manual grading, ensure that the grading of status reports is highly matched with the actual risk status of equipment, and automatically match the appropriate initial process status, laying the foundation for subsequent differentiated process advancement strategies, and significantly improving the standardization level and response efficiency of experience feedback management.

[0023] S3, when the target level is low, set the initial process status of the status report to the issuance status, and establish a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process.

[0024] When the target level of the status report is determined to be low, this method directly configures the initial process state of the status report to the issuance state, thereby skipping the manual review and issuance step, and on this basis, constructs a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process. This status linkage mechanism aims to establish a logical mapping relationship between two different business process nodes, so that the progress of the status report no longer depends on independent manual triggering, but is automatically executed in response to the status changes of the work application process. Through this mechanism, the low-level status report can remain synchronized with the work application process throughout its lifecycle. According to preset correspondence rules, the key node states of the work application process are mapped to the corresponding process states of the status report, achieving automated cross-process driving. As one implementation, when the target level is D, the initial process state of the status report is set to the issuance state, and the approved state in the work application process is selected to correspond to the issuance state of the status report, and the canceled or completed termination states in the work application process are selected to correspond to the end state of the status report, thereby establishing an automatic progression association between the two, and allowing the automatic progression mode to be adjusted to manual mode under specific conditions.

[0025] The aforementioned technical measures, by automatically issuing low-level status reports and establishing a cross-process status linkage mechanism, effectively eliminate unnecessary manual intervention steps and significantly shorten the processing cycle from report generation to issuance. Simultaneously, the automated advancement achieved through the status linkage mechanism ensures a high degree of consistency between the status reporting process and the work application process, avoiding process asynchrony issues caused by delays or omissions due to human operation. This significantly improves the overall operational efficiency and management automation level of the nuclear power plant's experience feedback system.

[0026] S4. Monitor the status changes of the work application process. When the work application process is detected to have entered the termination state, automatically advance the process status reported by the status linkage mechanism to the end state.

[0027] The core of monitoring work application process status changes and automatically advancing status reports to the end state based on a status linkage mechanism lies in constructing a status mapping and synchronization logic between the source and target processes. This step continuously monitors the lifecycle events of the work application process, identifies the termination states that represent process end, and triggers a preset linkage response mechanism once the state signal is captured. This allows the associated status report process to synchronously flow to the end state without manual intervention. This technical approach establishes an automated control relationship with the work application process status as the driving source and the status report process status as the passive target, ensuring consistency between the experience feedback loop and the management operation loop. Within the scope of this overarching concept, as a specific implementation method, for status reports identified as low-level, the "cancelled" and "completed" states in the work application process can be pre-configured as trigger conditions. When the work application process is detected to have entered either of these termination states, the system automatically advances the corresponding status report process status to the "end" state, while keeping other attribute fields of the status report unchanged and only performing automatic transitions of process nodes.

[0028] Compared with related technologies, in this embodiment, by responding to the work application process entering the approval completion state, a corresponding status report is automatically generated according to the job type of the work application, and the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type are obtained; based on a preset level mapping rule, the target level and initial process status of the status report are determined according to the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority; when the target level is low, the initial process status of the status report is set to the issuance state, and a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process is established; the status change of the work application process is monitored, and when the work application process is detected to enter the termination state, the process status of the status report is automatically advanced to the end state according to the status linkage mechanism. This can solve the problems in related technologies where the generation, leveling, and process advancement of status reports all rely on manual operation, resulting in high labor costs, low process operation efficiency, and easy omissions in filling and process advancement. It achieves the technical effect of automating the status report process of nuclear power plants, significantly reducing human control costs, and significantly improving the efficiency of status report management and the standardization and timeliness of the nuclear power plant experience feedback system.

[0029] Example 2 Based on the above embodiments, this embodiment further defines step S1 of the automatic advancement method of the nuclear power plant status report management process as follows: "In response to the work application process entering the approval completion state, the corresponding status report is automatically generated according to the work type of the work application, and the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the work type are obtained. This includes: monitoring the flow nodes of the work application process; when the work application process is detected to have entered the approval completion state, the work type field in the work application is extracted; if the work type field is CM-fault repair or DM-defect repair, the status report generation program is automatically triggered and a new status report instance is created; the CR generation method field in the work application process is automatically filled with the work application, and the equipment criticality level and processing priority data associated with the work type are read from the system equipment database, wherein the equipment criticality level includes CC1, CC2, NC or RTM, and the processing priority includes level 0, level 1 or level 2." The document further specifies that "if the job type field is CM-fault repair or DM-defect repair, the status report generation program will be automatically triggered and a new status report instance will be created, including: determining the specific value of the job type field; when the job type field is CM-fault repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 and the processing priority is 0, a status report instance with a target level of B will be generated; when the job type field is CM-fault repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 and the processing priority is 1 or 2, or the extracted equipment criticality level is CC2 and the processing priority is 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C will be generated; when the job type field is DM-defect repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 and the processing priority is 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C will be generated, and the initial process status of the generated B or C level status report instance will be marked as pending issuance." The document provides a detailed description of the specific implementation of this feature.

[0030] In this embodiment, the specific implementation process of step S1 includes real-time monitoring of the workflow nodes of the nuclear power plant work application process. The system continuously scans the status fields of the work application process. When it detects that the work application process has entered the "approved" completion state, it uses this status signal as the input source to trigger subsequent data extraction actions. The processing actions first include parsing the job type field in the work application and determining whether its specific value is "CM-Fault Repair" or "DM-Defect Repair". If the job type field matches either of the above types, the status report generation program is automatically triggered to create a new status report instance, and the "CR generation method" field in the newly generated status report instance is automatically filled with "Work Application", thereby completing the initial creation of the status report. Subsequently, the system uses the newly generated status report instance and the associated job type as input to read the equipment criticality classification and processing priority data corresponding to the equipment involved in the job type from the system equipment database. Specifically, the read equipment criticality classification data includes four levels: CC1, CC2, NC, or RTM, where CC1 represents critical and sensitive equipment, and RTM represents equipment in operation for maintenance. The read processing priority data includes levels 0, 1, or 2, corresponding to extremely urgent, moderately urgent, and non-urgent levels, respectively. In one possible implementation, in conjunction with the limitations of the dependent claims, the system further determines the combination logic of job type, equipment criticality classification, and processing priority while extracting the above data: when the job type is CM-fault repair and the equipment criticality classification is CC1 with a processing priority of 0, a status report instance with a target level of B is directly generated; when the job type is CM-fault repair and the equipment criticality classification is CC1 with a processing priority of 1 or 2, or the equipment criticality classification is CC2 with a processing priority of 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C is generated; when the job type is DM-defect repair and the equipment criticality classification is CC1 with a processing priority of 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C is also generated. For the B-level or C-level status report instances generated above, the system uniformly marks their initial process status as "pending issuance" as the output result, waiting for subsequent review and issuance by the department head / shift leader.

[0031] This implementation method establishes a precise triggering mechanism for the automatic generation of work application approval completion status and status reports. Combined with multi-dimensional combination logic of equipment criticality classification and processing priority, it realizes the automated classification and initial status configuration of B-level and C-level status reports. This effectively avoids the problems of misjudgment of level and process delay that may occur due to manual filling, and significantly improves the standardization and response speed of status report management.

[0032] Example 3 Based on the above embodiments, this embodiment further defines the S2 step in the automatic advancement method of the nuclear power plant status report management process as follows: "The determination of the target level and initial process status of the status report based on the preset hierarchical mapping rules, according to the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority, includes: calling a pre-stored hierarchical mapping rule table, matching the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority as a joint query index, wherein the hierarchical mapping rule table defines the status report level corresponding to different criticality levels and different processing priority combinations when the job type is CM or DM; when the matching result is level D, the target level of the status report is determined to be level D, and the CR level field of the status report is automatically marked as D, while the initial process status of the status report is directly set to the issuance status, and the level D status report is configured not to generate pending tasks." The specific implementation of this step is described in detail.

[0033] In this embodiment, the specific implementation process of determining the target level and initial process status of the status report based on the preset hierarchical mapping rules in step S2 is as follows. The system first calls the hierarchical mapping rule table pre-stored in the database. The input source for this table is data from three dimensions: job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority obtained in step S1. Specifically, the system uses these three parameters as a joint query index to perform precise matching in the hierarchical mapping rule table. This hierarchical mapping rule table predefines the unique status report level corresponding to different criticality levels and different processing priorities when the job type is CM (fault repair) or DM (defect repair). The criticality levels include four levels: CC1, CC2, NC, and RTM; the processing priorities include three levels: level 0, level 1, and level 2. When the matching logic determines that the result corresponding to the current combination is level D, the system performs a specific processing action, that is, locking the target level of the status report to level D and automatically writing the flag value "D" to the "CR level" field of the status report data structure. Simultaneously, the system directly configures the initial process status of the status report to the "issued" status, skipping the "pending issuance" node and the section chief review process. As a further limitation of this processing action, the system is configured not to generate any pending tasks when generating the D-level status report, i.e., it does not push approval requests to the company's OEE or other users. The output of this process is a status report instance with a level label of D, a process status of "issued", and no associated pending tasks. This instance is then used as input to step S3 to establish a status linkage mechanism with the work application process.

[0034] The above implementation method achieves automated and accurate determination of status report level through a predefined hierarchical mapping rule table. In particular, for level D status reports, by automatically marking the "CR level" field and directly setting it to the "issued" status, the manual classification and preliminary review process is effectively eliminated. Furthermore, the configuration does not generate pending tasks, avoiding interference from invalid processes, and significantly improving the processing efficiency and management automation level of low-level status reports in nuclear power plants.

[0035] Example 4 Based on the above embodiments, this embodiment further defines the S3 step in the automatic advancement method of the nuclear power plant status report management process as follows: "When the target level is low, the initial process status of the status report is set to the issuance status, and a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process is established, including: determining whether the target level is D level; when the determination result is yes, the advancement mode field of the status report is set to automatic by default, and a bidirectional mapping relationship is established between the work application process status and the D level status report process status; the approved status of the work application process is mapped to the issuance status of the D level status report, and the canceled or completed status of the work application process is mapped to the end status of the D level status report, wherein the intermediate status of the work application process is not associated with the intermediate status of the D level status report." The specific implementation of this step is described in detail.

[0036] In this embodiment, for a status report with a target level determined to be D, the system first reads the level identifier of the status report as input and performs initial process status settings and linkage mechanism establishment actions. Specifically, when the target level is confirmed to be D, the system initializes the "Progress Method" field in the newly generated status report to "Automatic" by default and establishes a bidirectional mapping relationship between the work application process status and the D-level status report process status at the database level. The specific configuration of this mapping relationship is as follows: the "Approved" status of the work application process is mapped to the "Issued" status of the D-level status report, as the starting point for the status report to take effect; at the same time, the "Cancelled" or "Completed" status of the work application process is mapped to the "Ended" status of the D-level status report, as the triggering condition for process termination. In this mapping logic, the intermediate status of the work application process is not associated with any intermediate status of the D-level status report, ensuring that only changes in the status of key nodes will trigger linkage output.

[0037] Furthermore, within the time window from the initial generation of the status report until it enters the "End" state, the system allows the company's OEE to adjust the "Progression Method" field. The input source is the modification instruction issued by the company's OEE, and the processing actions include verifying whether the current status report is in the "End" state and the current progression method attribute. If it is detected that the status report has not yet entered the "End" state and the progression method has been changed from "Automatic" to "Manual," the system immediately interrupts the original status linkage mechanism and transfers the status report to the "Classification" node awaiting company OEE approval, allowing it to be processed according to its own independent process for issuing status reports. Simultaneously, the content of the "CR Generation Method" field is strictly preserved to ensure the traceability of the data source. Conversely, if an attempt is made to change the progression method from "Manual" to "Automatic," the system will reject the operation. Once the status report is detected to have entered the "End" state, the system immediately locks the "Progression Method" field, prohibiting any form of modification, thereby ensuring the integrity and immutability of historical process data.

[0038] The above implementation method, by establishing a precise state mapping and a controllable mode switching mechanism, realizes the organic combination of automated flow and anomaly intervention of Level D status reports throughout the entire life cycle. This not only significantly reduces the manual management cost of low-level reports, but also retains the manual control capability of key nodes, effectively improving the flexibility and reliability of the nuclear power plant experience feedback process.

[0039] Example 5 Based on the above embodiments, this embodiment further defines the S4 step in the automatic advancement method of the nuclear power plant status report management process as follows: "Monitoring the status change of the work application process, and when the work application process is detected to enter the termination state, automatically advancing the process status of the status report to the end state according to the status linkage mechanism, including: continuously polling or receiving status change events of the work application process, parsing the target status identifier in the status change event; when the target status identifier is identified as canceled or completed and the target level of the current status report is D and the advancement mode is automatic, the automatic advancement logic is triggered, and the process status of the status report is directly updated from the current issuance state or other intermediate state to the end state without manual intervention, completing the automatic closed loop of the status report lifecycle." The specific implementation of this step is described in detail.

[0040] In this embodiment, for the specific implementation of monitoring work application process status changes and automatically advancing the status report to the end state in step S4, the system adopts a hybrid monitoring mechanism combining event-driven and timed polling. The input source is the status change event message queue generated in real time by the work application process management module or a snapshot of the process status fields in the database, which includes the unique identifier of the work application, the current target status identifier, and a timestamp. The processing action first involves the status monitoring service parsing the acquired target status identifier and matching it against a preset set of termination status identifiers. This set is explicitly defined to include both "cancelled" and "completed" status values. After successfully identifying a matching target status identifier, the system further performs logical verification, reading the "target level" and "advancement method" fields from the associated status report. The subsequent automatic advancement logic is triggered only when the target level is "D" and the advancement method is marked as "automatic." If the advancement method has been manually adjusted to "manual" by the company's OEE, or the status report is already in the "end" state, the automatic processing flow is terminated. Once the verification is successful, the system, without manual intervention, directly calls the process engine's status update interface to forcibly update the process status of the Level D status report from the current "Issued" status or any intermediate transition status to the "Completed" status. The output is a persistent change to the status report's lifecycle data; that is, the status report is officially marked as completed in the database, and a corresponding status transition log is generated, completing the automatic closed loop from the termination of the work application to the closure of the status report. During this process, the system strictly maintains the content of the "CR Generation Method" field unchanged to ensure the traceability of the data source. Moreover, this automatic advancement action is only executed when the work application reaches a clear termination node; intermediate status changes in the work application will not trigger this linkage mechanism, thus ensuring the accuracy and stability of the process advancement.

[0041] The above-described specific implementation method establishes a precise status identifier matching and multi-condition verification mechanism, which realizes the function of automatically closing the D-level status report when the work application is terminated. This effectively avoids the backlog of status reports caused by human forgetfulness or delayed operation, and significantly improves the operational efficiency and timeliness of the nuclear power plant experience feedback process and management loop.

[0042] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a status reporting process advancement device provided in an embodiment of this application, as shown below. Figure 2 As shown, it includes: response module 201, determination module 202, establishment module 203, and monitoring module 204.

[0043] The response module 201 is configured to automatically generate a corresponding status report based on the job type of the job application when the work application process enters the approval completion state, and to obtain the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type. The determination module 202 is configured to determine the target level and initial process status of the status report based on the preset hierarchical mapping rules, according to the job type, equipment criticality level and processing priority. Module 203 is configured to set the initial process status of the status report to the issuance status when the target level is low, and to establish a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process. The monitoring module 204 is configured to monitor the status changes of the work application process. When the work application process is detected to have entered the termination state, the status of the reported process is automatically advanced to the end state according to the status linkage mechanism.

[0044] In some examples of this embodiment, the response module 201 is specifically configured to monitor the flow nodes of the work application process. When it is detected that the work application process has entered the completed state after approval, the task type field in the work application is extracted. If the task type field is CM-fault repair or DM-defect repair, the status report generation program is automatically triggered and a new status report instance is created. The CR generation method field in the work application process is automatically filled with the work application, and the equipment criticality level and processing priority data associated with the task type are read from the system equipment database. The equipment criticality level includes CC1, CC2, NC or RTM, and the processing priority includes level 0, level 1 or level 2.

[0045] In some examples of this embodiment, the response module 201 is specifically configured to determine the specific value of the job type field. When the job type field is CM-fault repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 with a processing priority of 0, a status report instance with a target level of B is generated. When the job type field is CM-fault repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 with a processing priority of 1 or 2, or the extracted equipment criticality level is CC2 with a processing priority of 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C is generated. When the job type field is DM-defect repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 with a processing priority of 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C is generated, and the initial process status of the generated B or C status report instance is marked as pending issuance.

[0046] In some examples of this embodiment, the determining module 202 is specifically configured to call a pre-stored hierarchical mapping rule table, and use the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority as a joint query index for matching. The hierarchical mapping rule table defines the status report level corresponding to different criticality levels and different processing priorities when the job type is CM or DM. When the matching result is level D, the target level of the status report is determined to be level D, and the CR level field of the status report is automatically marked as D. At the same time, the initial process status of the status report is directly set to the issuance status, and the level D status report is configured not to generate pending tasks.

[0047] In some examples of this embodiment, the establishment module 203 is specifically configured to determine whether the target level is level D. When the determination result is yes, the advancement method field of the status report is set to automatic by default, and a bidirectional mapping relationship is established between the work application process status and the level D status report process status. The approved status of the work application process is mapped to the issuance status of the level D status report, and the canceled or completed status of the work application process is mapped to the end status of the level D status report. The intermediate status of the work application process is not associated with the intermediate status of the level D status report.

[0048] In some examples of this embodiment, the monitoring module 204 is specifically configured to continuously poll or receive status change events in the work application process, and parse the target status identifier in the status change event; when the target status identifier is identified as canceled or completed and the target level of the current status report is D and the progress mode is automatic, the automatic progress logic is triggered, and the process status of the status report is directly updated from the current issuance status or other intermediate status to the end status without manual intervention, thus completing the automatic closed loop of the status report lifecycle.

[0049] It should be noted that other corresponding descriptions of the functional units involved in the status reporting process advancement device provided in this embodiment can be found in [reference]. Figure 1 The corresponding descriptions in [the document] will not be repeated here.

[0050] Based on the above, Figure 1 The embodiment illustrates a status reporting process advancement method. Correspondingly, this embodiment also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described... Figure 1 This illustrates a method for advancing a status reporting process.

[0051] Based on the above, Figure 1 The embodiment illustrates a status reporting process advancement method. Correspondingly, this embodiment also provides a computer program product, on which a computer program is stored. When executed by a processor, this computer program implements the above-described... Figure 1 This illustrates a method for advancing a status reporting process.

[0052] Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application can be embodied in the form of a software product, which can be stored in a non-volatile storage medium (such as CD-ROM, USB flash drive, mobile hard drive, etc.) and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (such as personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute the methods of various implementation scenarios of this application.

[0053] Based on the above, Figure 1 The method for advancing a status reporting process is shown, and Figure 2 To achieve the above objectives, the present application also provides an electronic device, such as a personal computer or a server, in the illustrated virtual device embodiment. This device includes a storage medium and a processor; the storage medium stores a computer program; the processor executes the computer program to implement the above-described virtual device. Figure 1 This illustrates a method for advancing a status reporting process.

[0054] In some embodiments, the aforementioned physical device may further include a user interface, a network interface, a camera, radio frequency (RF) circuitry, sensors, audio circuitry, a Wi-Fi module, etc. The user interface may include a display screen, an input unit such as a keyboard, etc., and optionally, a USB interface, a card reader interface, etc. In some embodiments, the network interface may include a standard wired interface, a wireless interface (such as a Wi-Fi interface), etc.

[0055] The storage medium may also include an operating system and a network communication module. The operating system is a program that manages the hardware and software resources of the aforementioned physical device, supporting the operation of information processing programs and other software and / or programs. The network communication module is used to enable communication between the various components within the storage medium, as well as communication with other hardware and software in the information processing physical device.

[0056] It should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as "first" and "second" are used merely to distinguish one entity or operation from another, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Furthermore, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or apparatus. Unless otherwise specified, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that includes the element.

[0057] The above are merely specific embodiments of this application, enabling those skilled in the art to understand or implement this application. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of this application. Therefore, this application is not to be limited to these embodiments, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features claimed herein.

Claims

1. A method for advancing a status reporting process, characterized in that, include: S1, in response to the work application process entering the approval completion state, automatically generate the corresponding status report according to the job type of the work application, and obtain the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type; S2, based on the preset hierarchical mapping rules, determine the target level and initial process status of the status report according to the operation type, equipment criticality level and processing priority; S3, when the target level is low, set the initial process status of the status report to the issuance status, and establish a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process; S4. Monitor the status changes of the work application process. When the work application process is detected to have entered the termination state, automatically advance the process status reported by the status linkage mechanism to the end state.

2. The status reporting process advancement method according to claim 1, characterized in that, In response to the work application process entering the approval completion state, a corresponding status report is automatically generated based on the job type of the work application, and the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type are obtained, including: Monitor the workflow nodes of the work application process. When the work application process is detected to have entered the completed state after approval, extract the job type field from the work application. If the job type field is CM-fault repair or DM-defect repair, the status report generation program is automatically triggered and a new status report instance is created. The CR generation method field in the work application process is automatically filled with a work application, and the equipment criticality level and processing priority data associated with the job type are read from the system equipment database. The equipment criticality level includes CC1, CC2, NC or RTM, and the processing priority includes level 0, level 1 or level 2.

3. The status reporting process advancement method according to claim 2, characterized in that, If the job type field is CM-Fault Repair or DM-Defect Repair, then the status report generation program is automatically triggered and a new status report instance is created, including: Determine the specific value of the job type field. When the job type field is CM-fault repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 and the processing priority is 0, generate a status report instance with a target level of B. When the job type field is CM-fault repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 and the processing priority is level 1 or 2, or the extracted equipment criticality level is CC2 and the processing priority is level 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C is generated. When the job type field is DM-Defect Repair and the extracted equipment criticality level is CC1 and the processing priority is level 0 or 1, a status report instance with a target level of C is generated, and the initial process status of the generated level B or C status report instance is marked as pending issuance.

4. The status reporting process advancement method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method based on preset hierarchical mapping rules determines the target level and initial process status of the status report according to the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority, including: The pre-stored hierarchical mapping rule table is invoked, and the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority are used as a joint query index for matching. The hierarchical mapping rule table defines the status report level corresponding to different combinations of criticality level and processing priority when the job type is CM or DM. When the matching result is level D, the target level of the status report is determined to be level D, and the CR level field of the status report is automatically marked as D. At the same time, the initial process status of the status report is directly set to the issuance status, and the level D status report is configured not to generate any pending tasks.

5. The status reporting process advancement method according to claim 1, characterized in that, When the target level is low, the initial process status of the status report is set to the issuance status, and a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process is established, including: Determine whether the target level is D. If the determination result is yes, set the progress method field of the status report to automatic by default, and establish a two-way mapping relationship between the work application process status and the D-level status report process status. The approved status of the work application process is mapped to the issuance status of the D-level status report, and the canceled or completed status of the work application process is mapped to the end status of the D-level status report. Intermediate statuses of the work application process are not associated with intermediate statuses of the D-level status report.

6. The status reporting process advancement method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The monitoring of the status changes in the work application process, when detecting that the work application process has entered a terminated state, automatically advances the status report of the process to the end state according to the status linkage mechanism, including: Continuously poll or receive status change events in the work application process, and parse the target status identifier in the status change event; When the target status is identified as canceled or completed and the target level of the current status report is D and the progress mode is automatic, the automatic progress logic is triggered. Without manual intervention, the process status of the status report is directly updated from the current issuance status or other intermediate status to the completed status, thus completing the automatic closed loop of the status report lifecycle.

7. A status reporting process advancement device, characterized in that, include: The response module is configured to automatically generate a corresponding status report based on the job type of the job application when the work application process enters the approval completion state, and obtain the equipment criticality level and processing priority associated with the job type. The determination module is configured to determine the target level and initial process status of the status report based on a preset hierarchical mapping rule, according to the job type, equipment criticality level, and processing priority. The module is configured to set the initial process status of the status report to the issuance status when the target level is low, and to establish a status linkage mechanism between the status report and the work application process. The monitoring module is configured to monitor the status changes of the work application process. When the work application process is detected to have entered the termination state, the module automatically advances the status of the reported process to the end state according to the status linkage mechanism.

8. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor, which, when executed by the at least one processor, enables the at least one processor to perform the status reporting process advancement method according to any one of claims 1-6.

9. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, characterized in that, The computer instructions are used to cause the computer to execute the status reporting process advancement method according to any one of claims 1-6.

10. A computer program product, characterized in that, It includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the status reporting process advancement method according to any one of claims 1-6.

Images