Prefabricated wall design methods, devices, and equipment based on toughness values ​​and cost.

Abstract

This application relates to the field of prefabricated wall technology. It discloses a design method, apparatus, and equipment for prefabricated walls based on toughness values ​​and costs. The method includes: selecting the minimum of the toughness repair rate of a node section and the toughness repair rate of a continuous section as the toughness value of the current design scheme; adding the construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme to generate the total cost of the current design scheme; generating the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme using a carbon emission model; generating a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme based on its toughness value, total carbon emissions, total cost, and a comprehensive evaluation model; and selecting the current design scheme as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall when the comprehensive evaluation value is less than a preset evaluation value. This application is beneficial for improving the efficiency of obtaining the target design scheme for prefabricated walls.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of prefabricated wall technology, and in particular to prefabricated wall design methods, apparatus and equipment based on toughness values ​​and cost. Background Technology

[0002] With the increasing frequency of natural disasters and the growing disturbance from nearby construction in recent years, the service environment of prefabricated walls has become increasingly complex. As prefabricated walls are structural components that primarily resist external water pressure, soil pressure, and various external loads, their stress state is directly affected by these environmental factors. Therefore, prefabricated walls often suffer varying degrees of damage during use.

[0003] Current design methods for prefabricated walls primarily focus on their mechanical properties during the construction phase, neglecting to consider their repair capabilities after damage. This results in prefabricated walls being unable to regain their designed functional state through conventional repair methods after disasters or disturbances from nearby construction, thus compromising their safety. Therefore, obtaining a target design solution for prefabricated walls has become a pressing technical problem that needs to be addressed during the design process. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This application provides a method, apparatus, and equipment for designing prefabricated walls based on toughness values ​​and costs, in order to solve the aforementioned technical problem of how to obtain the target design scheme for prefabricated walls.

[0005] In a first aspect, embodiments of this application provide a prefabricated wall design method based on toughness values ​​and cost, applied to electronic devices, the prefabricated wall design method comprising: Obtain the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall, which consists of continuous sections and node sections; Obtain the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme. Input the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool. Use the finite element analysis tool to generate the damage volume of the continuous section and the damage volume of the nodal section. Based on the damage volume of the continuous segment and the first duration model, the repair duration of the continuous segment is generated. Based on the repair duration of the continuous segment and the first toughness model, the toughness repair rate of the continuous segment is generated. Based on the damage volume of the node segment and the second duration model, the repair duration of the node segment is generated. Based on the repair duration of the node segment and the second toughness model, the toughness repair rate of the node segment is generated. The minimum value between the toughness repair rate of the node section and the toughness repair rate of the continuous section is selected as the toughness value of the current design scheme. The construction cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme is generated through the construction cost model, and the repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme is generated through the repair cost model. The construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme are added together to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. The total carbon emissions of the current design scheme are generated through the carbon emission model. Based on the toughness value, total carbon emissions, total cost and comprehensive evaluation model of the current design scheme, a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall.

[0006] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the first duration model is defined as follows: ; The repair time for continuous sections; Indicates the maintenance duration for consecutive sections; Indicates the construction duration of a continuous section; Indicates the damage volume of a continuous segment; The second duration model is defined as follows: ; This refers to the repair time for the node segment; Indicates the maintenance duration of the node section; Indicates the construction time of the node section; This represents the damage volume of the node segment.

[0007] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the first resilience model is defined as follows: ; This represents the resilience repair rate of a continuous segment. The higher the resilience repair rate of a continuous segment, the higher the repair efficiency of the continuous segment under disaster; the lower the resilience repair rate of a continuous segment, the lower the repair efficiency of the continuous segment under disaster. It is a continuous segment in the th The moment of inertia of the cross section at a given moment. It is the moment of inertia of the cross section of the continuous segment before damage; The repair time for continuous sections; The moment the disaster occurred; Indicates the continuous segment at the th The resilience value at a given moment; and The sum of these values ​​indicates the completion time of the repair of a continuous section; This represents the cumulative repair amount of a continuous section. The cumulative repair amount of a continuous section is the amount of repair obtained by continuously adding up the resilience value of the continuous section at each moment from the start time of the disaster to the completion time of the repair. A larger cumulative repair amount of a continuous section indicates a higher degree of repair under the disaster. A smaller cumulative repair amount of a continuous section indicates a lower degree of repair under the disaster.

[0008] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the second resilience model is defined as follows: ; This represents the resilience repair rate of a node segment; the higher the resilience repair rate of a node segment, the higher its repair efficiency under disaster; the lower the resilience repair rate of a node segment, the lower its repair efficiency under disaster. The node segment is in the 1st The moment of inertia of the cross section at a given moment. It is the moment of inertia of the cross section of the node segment before damage; This refers to the repair time for the node segment; The moment the disaster occurred; Indicates the node segment at the 1st The resilience value at a given moment; and The sum of these values ​​indicates the completion time of the repair of the node segment; This represents the cumulative repair amount of a node segment. The cumulative repair amount of a node segment is the amount of repair obtained by continuously accumulating the resilience value of the node segment at each moment from the start time of the disaster to the completion time of the repair. A larger cumulative repair amount of a node segment indicates a higher degree of repair under the disaster, while a smaller cumulative repair amount of a node segment indicates a lower degree of repair under the disaster.

[0009] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the construction cost model is defined as follows: ; This indicates the construction cost of prefabricated walls under the current design scheme; This refers to the material costs during the construction phase of prefabricated walls. The usage of the kth type of building material Let $k$ be the ex-factory price of the kth type of building material. This refers to the labor costs during the construction phase of prefabricated walls. Let m be the number of working days for the m-th type of job. The daily wage corresponding to the m-th job type; The cost of machinery rental during the construction phase of prefabricated wall systems; Let be the number of shifts for the y-th type of machine. Let y be the rental unit price per shift for the yth type of machinery; Transportation costs for prefabricated wall panels during the construction phase; The transportation distance of the kth type of building material; Let be the unit price for transporting the k-th type of building material; The repair cost model is defined as follows: ; This indicates the repair cost of the prefabricated wall structure under the current design scheme; The fixed cost of a continuous section is calculated by summing the scaffolding erection cost and the site clearing cost of the continuous section. The fixed costs of the node section are calculated by summing the scaffolding erection costs and site clearing costs of the node section. The variable cost of a continuous section is calculated by summing the material costs and machinery rental fees of the continuous section during the repair phase. The variable cost of the node section is the sum of the material costs and machinery rental fees of the node section during the repair phase. The unit price for surface treatment of a continuous section is the sum of the sanding cost, paint cost, and whitewash cost for the continuous section. The unit price for surface treatment of the node section is calculated by summing the costs of sanding, coating, and whitewashing of the node section. This represents the area of ​​the damaged region within a continuous segment. This represents the area of ​​the damaged region in the node segment.

[0010] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the carbon emission model is defined as follows: ; ; ; This represents the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme; This represents the carbon emissions of the current design scheme during the construction phase. The amount of building material used during the construction phase. Let be the carbon emission factor during the production of the k-th building material; Let be the transportation distance of the k-th type of building material during the construction phase; Let be the carbon emission factor of the kth type of building material during transportation; Let y be the number of shifts for the y-th type of construction machinery during the construction phase. Let y be the energy consumption per shift for the y-th type of construction machinery. The carbon emission factor of the energy used by the y-th type of construction machinery; This represents the carbon emissions of the current design scheme during the repair phase. Indicates the volume of a continuous segment; Indicates the volume of the node segment; The carbon emission baseline value for a continuous section is obtained by summing the carbon emission values ​​of building materials, transportation, and construction in the continuous section. The carbon emission value of building materials in a continuous section refers to the product of the amount of each building material used in the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during production in the repair process of a continuous section. The carbon emission value of continuous segment transportation refers to the product of the transportation distance of each building material during the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during transportation in the continuous segment repair process; The carbon emission value of construction in a continuous section refers to the product of the number of shifts of each type of construction machinery during the repair phase and the carbon emission factor of the energy used by the construction machinery in the repair process of a continuous section. The carbon emission baseline value for the node section is obtained by summing the carbon emission values ​​of building materials, transportation, and construction in the node section. The carbon emission value of building materials in a node section refers to the product of the amount of each building material used in the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during production in the repair process of the node section. The carbon emission value of transportation in a node section refers to the product of the transportation distance of each building material during the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during transportation in the repair process of the node section. The construction carbon emission value of a node section refers to the product of the number of shifts of each type of construction machinery during the repair phase and the carbon emission factor of the energy used by the construction machinery in the repair process of the node section.

[0011] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the comprehensive evaluation model is defined as follows: ; This represents the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme. The higher the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme, the weaker its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. The lower the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme, the stronger its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. X represents the current design scheme; , , These are the first weighting coefficient, the second weighting coefficient, and the third weighting coefficient, respectively. This indicates the toughness value of the current design scheme; the higher the toughness value of the current design scheme, the stronger the toughness recovery ability of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme; the lower the toughness value of the current design scheme, the weaker the toughness recovery ability of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. This indicates the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme. The larger the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme, the more greenhouse gas emissions it will produce, and the greater its impact on the environment. The smaller the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme, the less greenhouse gas emissions it will produce, and the smaller its impact on the environment. This represents the total cost of the current design scheme; the higher the total cost of the current design scheme, the worse its economic efficiency; the lower the total cost of the current design scheme, the better its economic efficiency.

[0012] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall are obtained from the design parameters of the current design scheme. These parameters are then input into a finite element analysis tool, which generates the damage volume of continuous sections and the damage volume of nodal sections, including: Obtain the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme, and input the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool; A finite element model of the prefabricated wall was established using finite element analysis tools. Disaster loads were applied to the finite element model to obtain the disaster bending moment distribution curve, damage data for continuous sections, and damage data for nodal sections of the prefabricated wall. From the damage data of the continuous sections, the length of deformation in the continuous section and the equivalent moment of inertia of each micro-segment in the damaged state were obtained. Based on the length of deformation in the continuous section, the equivalent moment of inertia of each micro-segment in the damaged state, and the first volume model, the continuous section was generated. The damage volume is calculated by reading the bending moment value corresponding to the height of the node segment on the disaster bending moment distribution curve along the height. The bending moment value corresponding to the height of the node segment is selected as the disaster bending moment borne by the node segment. Based on the disaster bending moment borne by the node segment and the rotation angle model, the rotation angle of the node segment under stress is generated. Based on the rotation angle of the node segment under stress, the damage depth of each contact surface in the node segment is obtained from the damage data of the node segment. Based on the rotation angle of the node segment under stress, the damage depth of each contact surface in the node segment, and the second volume model, the damage volume of the node segment is generated.

[0013] Secondly, embodiments of this application provide a prefabricated wall design device based on toughness value and cost, applied to electronic devices, including: The first acquisition module is used to acquire the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall, which consists of continuous sections and node sections; The second acquisition module is used to obtain the geometric dimensions, material parameters and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme, input the geometric dimensions, material parameters and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool, and generate the damage volume of the continuous section and the damage volume of the nodal section through the finite element analysis tool. The first generation module is used to generate the repair duration of the continuous segment based on the damage volume of the continuous segment and the first duration model, generate the toughness repair rate of the continuous segment based on the repair duration of the continuous segment and the first toughness model, generate the repair duration of the node segment based on the damage volume of the node segment and the second duration model, and generate the toughness repair rate of the node segment based on the repair duration of the node segment and the second toughness model. The second generation module is used to select the minimum value between the toughness repair rate of the node section and the toughness repair rate of the continuous section as the toughness value of the current design scheme. Through the construction cost model, it generates the construction cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. Through the repair cost model, it generates the repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. The design module is used to add the construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. Through the carbon emission model, the total carbon emission of the current design scheme is generated. Based on the toughness value, the total carbon emission, the total cost, and the comprehensive evaluation model of the current design scheme, a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall.

[0014] Thirdly, embodiments of this application provide an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the prefabricated wall design method described in the first aspect above.

[0015] Fourthly, embodiments of this application provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the prefabricated wall design method described in the first aspect above.

[0016] Fifthly, embodiments of this application provide a computer program product that, when run on an electronic device, causes the electronic device to execute the prefabricated wall design method described in the first aspect above.

[0017] The beneficial effects of the embodiments of this application are as follows: Firstly, the construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme are added together to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. The total carbon emissions of the current design scheme are generated through a carbon emission model. Based on the toughness value, total carbon emissions, total cost, and comprehensive evaluation model of the current design scheme, a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall. Since no manual acquisition is required, the acquisition time of the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall is reduced, which is conducive to improving the acquisition efficiency of the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall. Secondly, the higher the comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme, the weaker its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost; the lower the comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme, the stronger its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, selecting the current design scheme as the target design scheme for prefabricated walls is beneficial to improving the reliability of the target design scheme for prefabricated walls. Attached Figure Description

[0018] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0019] Figure 1 This application scenario diagram illustrates the prefabricated wall design method provided in the embodiments of this application. Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating the prefabricated wall design method provided in the embodiments of this application; Figure 3 A flowchart illustrating the target design scheme provided in the embodiments of this application; Figure 4 A schematic block diagram of the prefabricated wall design device provided in the embodiments of this application; Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the electronic device provided in the embodiments of this application; Figure 6 These are example diagrams of continuous segments and node segments provided in the embodiments of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0020] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this application clearer, the following detailed description is provided in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the scope of this application. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments in this application without inventive effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0021] The prefabricated wall design method provided in this application can be applied to electronic devices, including but not limited to servers, mobile phones, tablets, and laptops. This application does not impose any restrictions on the specific type of electronic device.

[0022] Please see Figure 1 , Figure 1 The application scenario diagram of the prefabricated wall design method provided in the embodiments of this application is described in detail below: Electronic devices access the database to retrieve the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall, which consists of continuous sections and node sections.

[0023] In this embodiment of the application, the electronic device obtains the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall from the database, which can reduce the time required to obtain the current design scheme.

[0024] Please see Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating the prefabricated wall design method provided in this application embodiment, which can be applied to electronic devices.

[0025] like Figure 2 As shown in the embodiments of this application, the prefabricated wall design method includes the following steps, which are detailed below: S201, Obtain the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall, which consists of continuous sections and node sections; refer to Figure 6 , Figure 6 Here are sample diagrams of continuous segments and nodal segments provided in the embodiments of this application, detailed below: like Figure 6 As shown, the prefabricated wall is vertically divided into continuous sections and node sections. The joint between adjacent wall panels is defined as a node section, while the main body of the prefabricated wall, excluding node sections, is defined as a continuous section.

[0026] The prefabricated wall is divided into continuous sections and node sections along the vertical direction, which has important guiding significance for the construction and subsequent repair of the current design scheme.

[0027] During the construction phase, node sections, as critical components for structural force transmission, are complex in construction and require high quality, thus they should be a key focus of construction quality control. Stricter inspection standards should be applied to key processes such as grouting fullness, sleeve connection quality, and post-poured concrete vibration, and zoning acceptance criteria should be established accordingly to achieve refined management of construction quality. Furthermore, continuous sections and node sections differ in construction difficulty and technological requirements; zoning facilitates optimization of construction sequence and process arrangement, early identification of construction risks arising from space constraints and pre-embedded positioning deviations in node sections, and allows for the development of specialized construction plans and quality pre-control measures, reducing potential construction quality hazards.

[0028] In the later repair phase, damage to continuous sections mainly manifests as cracking and concrete crushing, while damage to node sections mainly manifests as joint opening, grout failure, and connector yielding; the damage modes of the two are different. After zoning, the repair scope can be accurately located according to the damage level of each section, and targeted repair measures can be formulated separately to avoid blind demolition and excessive replacement, ensuring reliable repair results and controllable costs. After the repair is completed, continuous sections and node sections can be retested and evaluated to verify whether the repair effect meets their respective safety standards, ensuring that the overall performance of the structure is restored to the design level after repair.

[0029] S202: Obtain the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme. Input the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool. Generate the damage volume of the continuous section and the damage volume of the nodal section through the finite element analysis tool. The geometric dimensions of the prefabricated wall include its height, width, thickness, and joint gaps. The material parameters include the concrete strength grade of the prefabricated wall, the elastic modulus of the prefabricated wall, and the Poisson's ratio of the prefabricated wall. The load boundary conditions include the soil lateral pressure of the prefabricated wall and the groundwater pressure of the prefabricated wall.

[0030] Specifically, the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall are obtained from the design parameters of the current design scheme. These parameters are then input into a finite element analysis tool, which generates the damage volume for continuous sections and the damage volume for nodal sections. Obtain the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme, and input the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool; In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall are obtained from the design parameters of the current design scheme. These parameters are then input into a finite element analysis tool, which generates the damage volume of continuous sections and the damage volume of nodal sections, including: Obtain the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme, and input the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool; A finite element model of the prefabricated wall was established using finite element analysis tools. Disaster loads were applied to the finite element model to obtain the disaster bending moment distribution curve, damage data for continuous sections, and damage data for nodal sections of the prefabricated wall. From the damage data of the continuous sections, the length of deformation in the continuous section and the equivalent moment of inertia of each micro-segment in the damaged state were obtained. Based on the length of deformation in the continuous section, the equivalent moment of inertia of each micro-segment in the damaged state, and the first volume model, the continuous section was generated. The damage volume is calculated by reading the bending moment value corresponding to the height of the node segment on the disaster bending moment distribution curve along the height. The bending moment value corresponding to the height of the node segment is selected as the disaster bending moment borne by the node segment. Based on the disaster bending moment borne by the node segment and the rotation angle model, the rotation angle of the node segment under stress is generated. Based on the rotation angle of the node segment under stress, the damage depth of each contact surface in the node segment is obtained from the damage data of the node segment. Based on the rotation angle of the node segment under stress, the damage depth of each contact surface in the node segment, and the second volume model, the damage volume of the node segment is generated.

[0031] The disaster bending moment distribution curve refers to the bending moment distribution curve drawn under disaster load, with the height coordinate of the prefabricated wall as the abscissa and the bending moment value of the prefabricated wall section as the ordinate.

[0032] The corner model is defined as follows: ; The disaster bending moment borne by the node section; h represents the thickness of the prefabricated wall structure; It is the moment of inertia of the cross section of the node segment before damage; It is the elastic modulus of the nodal segment before damage; and The product of these is the initial bending stiffness of the nodal segment; The stiffness reduction factor has a value of 0.5 to 0.8, preferably 0.7. The function of the stiffness reduction factor is to reduce the initial bending stiffness of the node section.

[0033] The first volume model is defined as follows: ; The damage volume represents the continuous segment. The cross-sectional width of the continuous section; The cross-sectional height of the continuous section; Indicates the length of the continuous segment where deformation occurs; This represents the length of each micro-segment within a continuous segment; Indicates the first segment in a continuous segment The equivalent moment of inertia of a micro-segment under damage conditions; This represents the number of micro-segments that a continuous segment is divided into.

[0034] The second volume model is defined as follows: ; The damage volume of the node segment; This represents the tangent of the rotation angle of the node segment under stress. Indicates the angle of rotation of the node segment under stress; The cross-sectional height of the node section; The contact surface number is assigned to the node segment, and the value of the contact surface number ranges from 1 to 4. Here are the micro-element numbers for the node segments, with values ​​ranging from 1 to... ; For the first node segment Damage depth of each contact surface.

[0035] S203, based on the damage volume of the continuous segment and the first duration model, generate the repair duration of the continuous segment; based on the repair duration of the continuous segment and the first toughness model, generate the toughness repair rate of the continuous segment; based on the damage volume of the node segment and the second duration model, generate the repair duration of the node segment; based on the repair duration of the node segment and the second toughness model, generate the toughness repair rate of the node segment. The first duration model is defined as follows: ; The repair time for continuous sections; Indicates the maintenance duration for consecutive sections; Indicates the construction duration of a continuous section; This represents the damage volume of a continuous segment.

[0036] The second duration model is defined as follows: ; This refers to the repair time for the node segment; Indicates the maintenance duration of the node section; Indicates the construction time of the node section; This represents the damage volume of the node segment.

[0037] The curing time for a continuous section is the time required after the construction of the continuous section. The curing time for a continuous section is used to ensure that the concrete or repair materials in the continuous section reach sufficient strength.

[0038] The curing time for a node section is the time required after the construction of the node section. The curing time for a node section is used to ensure that the concrete or repair materials in the node section reach sufficient strength.

[0039] The first resilience model is defined as follows: ; This represents the resilience repair rate of a continuous segment. The higher the resilience repair rate of a continuous segment, the higher the repair efficiency of the continuous segment under disaster; the lower the resilience repair rate of a continuous segment, the lower the repair efficiency of the continuous segment under disaster. It is a continuous segment in the th The moment of inertia of the cross section at a given moment. It is the moment of inertia of the cross section of the continuous segment before damage; The repair time for continuous sections; The moment the disaster occurred; Indicates the continuous segment at the th The resilience value at a given moment; and The sum of these values ​​indicates the completion time of the repair of a continuous section; This represents the cumulative repair amount of a continuous section. The cumulative repair amount of a continuous section is the amount of repair obtained by continuously adding up the resilience value of the continuous section at each moment from the start time of the disaster to the completion time of the repair. A larger cumulative repair amount of a continuous section indicates a higher degree of repair under the disaster. A smaller cumulative repair amount of a continuous section indicates a lower degree of repair under the disaster.

[0040] The second toughness model is defined as follows: ; This represents the resilience repair rate of a node segment; the higher the resilience repair rate of a node segment, the higher its repair efficiency under disaster; the lower the resilience repair rate of a node segment, the lower its repair efficiency under disaster. The node segment is in the 1st The moment of inertia of the cross section at a given moment. It is the moment of inertia of the cross section of the node segment before damage; This refers to the repair time for the node segment; The moment the disaster occurred; Indicates the node segment at the 1st The resilience value at a given moment; and The sum of these values ​​indicates the completion time of the repair of the node segment; This represents the cumulative repair amount of a node segment. The cumulative repair amount of a node segment is the amount of repair obtained by continuously accumulating the resilience value of the node segment at each moment from the start time of the disaster to the completion time of the repair. A larger cumulative repair amount of a node segment indicates a higher degree of repair under the disaster, while a smaller cumulative repair amount of a node segment indicates a lower degree of repair under the disaster.

[0041] S204. Select the minimum value between the toughness repair rate of the node section and the toughness repair rate of the continuous section as the toughness value of the current design scheme. Through the construction cost model, generate the construction cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. Through the repair cost model, generate the repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. The construction cost model is defined as follows: ; This indicates the construction cost of prefabricated walls under the current design scheme; This refers to the material costs during the construction phase of prefabricated walls. The usage of the kth type of building material Let $k$ be the ex-factory price of the kth type of building material. This refers to the labor costs during the construction phase of prefabricated walls. Let m be the number of working days for the m-th type of job. The daily wage corresponding to the m-th job type; The cost of machinery rental during the construction phase of prefabricated wall systems; Let be the number of shifts for the y-th type of machine. Let y be the rental unit price per shift for the yth type of machinery; Transportation costs for prefabricated wall panels during the construction phase; The transportation distance of the kth type of building material; Let be the unit price for transporting the k-th type of building material; The repair cost model is defined as follows: ; This indicates the repair cost of the prefabricated wall structure under the current design scheme; The fixed cost of a continuous section is calculated by summing the scaffolding erection cost and the site clearing cost of the continuous section. The fixed costs of the node section are calculated by summing the scaffolding erection costs and site clearing costs of the node section. The variable cost of a continuous section is calculated by summing the material costs and machinery rental fees of the continuous section during the repair phase. The variable cost of the node section is the sum of the material costs and machinery rental fees of the node section during the repair phase. The unit price for surface treatment of a continuous section is the sum of the sanding cost, paint cost, and whitewash cost for the continuous section. The unit price for surface treatment of the node section is calculated by summing the costs of sanding, coating, and whitewashing of the node section. This represents the area of ​​the damaged region within a continuous segment. This represents the area of ​​the damaged region in the node segment.

[0042] S205 adds the construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. Through the carbon emission model, the total carbon emission of the current design scheme is generated. Based on the toughness value, the total carbon emission, the total cost, and the comprehensive evaluation model of the current design scheme, a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall.

[0043] The carbon emission model is defined as follows: ; ; ; This represents the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme; This represents the carbon emissions of the current design scheme during the construction phase. The amount of building material used during the construction phase. Let be the carbon emission factor during the production of the k-th building material; Let be the transportation distance of the k-th type of building material during the construction phase; Let be the carbon emission factor of the kth type of building material during transportation; Let y be the number of shifts for the y-th type of construction machinery during the construction phase. Let y be the energy consumption per shift for the y-th type of construction machinery. The carbon emission factor of the energy used by the y-th type of construction machinery; This represents the carbon emissions of the current design scheme during the repair phase. Indicates the volume of a continuous segment; Indicates the volume of the node segment; The carbon emission baseline value for a continuous section is obtained by summing the carbon emission values ​​of building materials, transportation, and construction in the continuous section. The carbon emission value of building materials in a continuous section refers to the product of the amount of each building material used in the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during production in the repair process of a continuous section. The carbon emission value of continuous segment transportation refers to the product of the transportation distance of each building material during the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during transportation in the continuous segment repair process; The carbon emission value of construction in a continuous section refers to the product of the number of shifts of each type of construction machinery during the repair phase and the carbon emission factor of the energy used by the construction machinery in the repair process of a continuous section. The carbon emission baseline value for the node section is obtained by summing the carbon emission values ​​of building materials, transportation, and construction in the node section. The carbon emission value of building materials in a node section refers to the product of the amount of each building material used in the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during production in the repair process of the node section. The carbon emission value of transportation in a node section refers to the product of the transportation distance of each building material during the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during transportation in the repair process of the node section. The construction carbon emission value of a node section refers to the product of the number of shifts of each type of construction machinery during the repair phase and the carbon emission factor of the energy used by the construction machinery in the repair process of the node section.

[0044] The comprehensive evaluation model is defined as follows: ; This represents the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme. The higher the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme, the weaker its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. The lower the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme, the stronger its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. X represents the current design scheme; , , These are the first weighting coefficient, the second weighting coefficient, and the third weighting coefficient, respectively. This indicates the toughness value of the current design scheme; the higher the toughness value of the current design scheme, the stronger the toughness recovery ability of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme; the lower the toughness value of the current design scheme, the weaker the toughness recovery ability of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. This indicates the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme. The larger the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme, the more greenhouse gas emissions it will produce, and the greater its impact on the environment. The smaller the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme, the less greenhouse gas emissions it will produce, and the smaller its impact on the environment. This represents the total cost of the current design scheme; the higher the total cost of the current design scheme, the worse its economic efficiency; the lower the total cost of the current design scheme, the better its economic efficiency.

[0045] The lower the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme, the stronger its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. When the overall evaluation value is lower than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall. This improvement makes the evaluation results of prefabricated walls more comprehensive and can meet the comprehensive requirements of engineering construction for structural safety, green and low-carbon development, and economic rationality.

[0046] The beneficial effects of the embodiments of this application are as follows: Firstly, the construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme are added together to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. The total carbon emissions of the current design scheme are generated through a carbon emission model. Based on the toughness value, total carbon emissions, total cost, and comprehensive evaluation model of the current design scheme, a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall. Since no manual acquisition is required, the acquisition time of the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall is reduced, which is conducive to improving the acquisition efficiency of the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall. Secondly, the higher the comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme, the weaker its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost; the lower the comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme, the stronger its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, selecting the current design scheme as the target design scheme for prefabricated walls is beneficial to improving the reliability of the target design scheme for prefabricated walls.

[0047] Please see Figure 3 , Figure 3 The flowchart illustrating the target design scheme provided in the embodiments of this application is described in detail below: S301, read the preset upload time and determine whether the current time is the upload time; S302, if the current time is the upload time, connect to the preset cloud platform and upload the target design scheme to the cloud platform.

[0048] In this embodiment, the target design scheme is uploaded to the cloud platform without being affected by local hardware failures. The target design scheme can be retained intact for a long time, ensuring the storage security of the target design scheme.

[0049] For the prefabricated wall design method described in the above embodiments, please refer to [link / reference]. Figure 4 , Figure 4 This is a schematic block diagram of the prefabricated wall design device provided in the embodiments of this application. Figure 4 The prefabricated wall design device 400 shown can be applied to, for example... Figure 1 The application scenario diagram shows electronic devices. The following section uses electronic devices as an example to illustrate this. Figure 4 The prefabricated wall design device 400 shown will be described in detail. The prefabricated wall design device 400 may include a first acquisition module 401, a second acquisition module 402, a first generation module 403, a second generation module 404, and a design module 405.

[0050] The first acquisition module 401 is used to acquire the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall, which consists of continuous sections and node sections; The second acquisition module 402 is used to acquire the geometric dimensions, material parameters and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme, input the geometric dimensions, material parameters and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool, and generate the damage volume of the continuous section and the damage volume of the nodal section through the finite element analysis tool. The first generation module 403 is used to generate the repair duration of the continuous segment based on the damage volume of the continuous segment and the first duration model, generate the toughness repair rate of the continuous segment based on the repair duration of the continuous segment and the first toughness model, generate the repair duration of the node segment based on the damage volume of the node segment and the second duration model, and generate the toughness repair rate of the node segment based on the repair duration of the node segment and the second toughness model. The second generation module 404 is used to select the minimum value between the toughness repair rate of the node section and the toughness repair rate of the continuous section as the toughness value of the current design scheme, generate the construction cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme through the construction cost model, and generate the repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme through the repair cost model. Design module 405 is used to add the construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. Through the carbon emission model, the total carbon emission of the current design scheme is generated. Based on the toughness value, the total carbon emission of the current design scheme, the total cost of the current design scheme, and the comprehensive evaluation model, the comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall.

[0051] It should be noted that the various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner, with each embodiment focusing on the differences from other embodiments. The same or similar parts between the various embodiments can be referred to each other.

[0052] Please see Figure 5 , Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0053] like Figure 5 As shown, Figure 5 The electronic device includes: at least one processor 20, a memory 21, and a computer program 22 stored in the memory 21 and executable on the at least one processor 20, wherein the processor 20 executes the computer program 22 to implement the steps in any of the above method embodiments.

[0054] The electronic device may include, but is not limited to, processor 20 and memory 21. Those skilled in the art will understand that... Figure 5 This is merely an example of an electronic device and does not constitute a limitation on electronic devices. It may include more or fewer components than shown in the illustration, or combinations of certain components, or different components. For example, it may also include input / output devices, network access devices, etc.

[0055] The processor 20 is used to run the computer program 22 stored in the memory 21. The processor 20 may be a central processing unit (CPU), or it may be other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc.

[0056] In some embodiments, the memory 21 may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device, such as a hard disk or memory of the electronic device.

[0057] In the above embodiments, the descriptions of each embodiment have different focuses. For parts that are not described in detail or recorded in a certain embodiment, please refer to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0058] The above are merely preferred embodiments of this application and do not limit the patent scope of this application. Any equivalent structural or procedural transformations made using the content of this application's specification and drawings, or direct or indirect applications in other related technical fields, are similarly included within the patent protection scope of this application.

Claims

1. A method for designing a fabricated wall based on a toughness value and a cost, the method comprising: determining a toughness value for a wall; determining a cost for the wall; and designing the wall based on the toughness value and the cost. The prefabricated wall design method, applied to electronic devices, includes: Obtain the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall, which consists of continuous sections and node sections; The process involves obtaining the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme, inputting these parameters into a finite element analysis (FEM) tool, and generating damage volumes for continuous sections and nodal sections using the FEM tool. This includes: obtaining the geometric dimensions, material parameters, and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme; inputting these parameters into a finite element analysis (FEM) tool; establishing a finite element model of the prefabricated wall using the FEM tool; applying disaster loads to the finite element model of the prefabricated wall; obtaining the disaster bending moment distribution curve of the prefabricated wall; damage data for continuous sections of the prefabricated wall; and damage data for nodal sections of the prefabricated wall. The damage data for continuous sections is then analyzed... The process involves obtaining the deformation length of a continuous segment and the equivalent moment of inertia of each micro-segment in the damaged state. Based on the deformation length, the equivalent moment of inertia of each micro-segment in the damaged state, and the first volume model, the damage volume of the continuous segment is generated. On the disaster bending moment along the height distribution curve, the bending moment value corresponding to the height of the node segment is read, and the bending moment value corresponding to the height of the node segment is selected as the disaster bending moment borne by the node segment. Based on the disaster bending moment borne by the node segment and the rotation angle model, the rotation angle of the node segment under stress is generated. Based on the rotation angle of the node segment under stress, the damage depth of each contact surface in the node segment is obtained from the damage data of the node segment. Based on the rotation angle of the node segment under stress, the damage depth of each contact surface in the node segment, and the second volume model, the damage volume of the node segment is generated. Based on the damage volume of the continuous segment and the first duration model, the repair duration of the continuous segment is generated. Based on the repair duration of the continuous segment and the first toughness model, the toughness repair rate of the continuous segment is generated. Based on the damage volume of the node segment and the second duration model, the repair duration of the node segment is generated. Based on the repair duration of the node segment and the second toughness model, the toughness repair rate of the node segment is generated. The minimum value between the toughness repair rate of the node section and the toughness repair rate of the continuous section is selected as the toughness value of the current design scheme. The construction cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme is generated through the construction cost model, and the repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme is generated through the repair cost model. The construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme are added together to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. The total carbon emissions of the current design scheme are generated through the carbon emission model. Based on the toughness value, the total carbon emissions, the total cost, and the comprehensive evaluation model of the current design scheme, a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall. The first duration model is defined as follows: ； a repair duration for a contiguous segment; represents the length of the maintenance period; represents the construction duration of the consecutive section; represents the volume of the lesion for the consecutive segment; The second duration model is defined as follows: ； a repair duration for the node section; a length of time of maintenance of the node section; representing the construction duration of the node section; representing a damage volume of the node segment; The first resilience model is defined as follows: ； represents the resilience repair rate of the continuous section, the greater the resilience repair rate of the continuous section, the higher the repair efficiency of the continuous section under the disaster; the smaller the resilience repair rate of the continuous section, the lower the repair efficiency of the continuous section under the disaster; is the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the continuous segment at the first time instant, is the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the continuous segment before the damage; The repair time for continuous sections; The moment the disaster occurred; Indicates the continuous segment at the th The resilience value at a given moment; and The sum of these values ​​indicates the completion time of the repair of a continuous section; This represents the cumulative repair amount of a continuous section. The cumulative repair amount of a continuous section is the amount of repair obtained by continuously adding up the resilience value of the continuous section at each moment from the start time of the disaster to the completion time of the repair. A larger cumulative repair amount of a continuous section indicates a higher degree of repair under the disaster; a smaller cumulative repair amount of a continuous section indicates a lower degree of repair under the disaster. The second resilience model is defined as follows: ； This represents the resilience repair rate of a node segment; the higher the resilience repair rate of a node segment, the higher its repair efficiency under disaster; the lower the resilience repair rate of a node segment, the lower its repair efficiency under disaster. The node segment is in the 1st The moment of inertia of the cross section at a given moment. It is the moment of inertia of the cross section of the node segment before damage; This refers to the repair time for the node segment; The moment the disaster occurred; Indicates the node segment at the 1st The resilience value at a given moment; and The sum of these values ​​indicates the completion time of the repair of the node segment; This represents the cumulative repair amount of a node segment. The cumulative repair amount of a node segment is the amount of repair obtained by continuously accumulating the resilience value of the node segment at each moment from the start time of the disaster to the completion time of the repair. A larger cumulative repair amount of a node segment indicates a higher degree of repair under the disaster, while a smaller cumulative repair amount of a node segment indicates a lower degree of repair under the disaster.

2. The prefabricated wall design method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The construction cost model is defined as follows: ； This indicates the construction cost of prefabricated walls under the current design scheme; This refers to the material costs during the construction phase of prefabricated walls. The usage of the kth type of building material Let $k$ be the ex-factory price of the kth type of building material. This refers to the labor costs during the construction phase of prefabricated walls. Let m be the number of working days for the m-th type of job. The daily wage corresponding to the m-th job type; The cost of machinery rental during the construction phase of prefabricated wall systems; Let be the number of shifts for the y-th type of machine. Let y be the rental unit price per shift for the yth type of machinery; Transportation costs for prefabricated wall panels during the construction phase; The transportation distance of the kth type of building material; Let be the unit price for transporting the k-th type of building material; The repair cost model is defined as follows: ； This indicates the repair cost of the prefabricated wall structure under the current design scheme; The fixed cost of a continuous section is calculated by summing the scaffolding erection cost and the site clearing cost of the continuous section. The fixed costs of the node section are calculated by summing the scaffolding erection costs and site clearing costs of the node section. The variable cost of a continuous section is calculated by summing the material costs and machinery rental fees of the continuous section during the repair phase. The variable cost of the node section is the sum of the material costs and machinery rental fees of the node section during the repair phase. The unit price for surface treatment of a continuous section is the sum of the sanding cost, paint cost, and whitewash cost for the continuous section. The unit price for surface treatment of the node section is calculated by summing the costs of sanding, coating, and whitewashing of the node section. This represents the area of ​​the damaged region within a continuous segment. This represents the area of ​​the damaged region in the node segment.

3. The prefabricated wall design method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The carbon emission model is defined as follows: ； ； ； This represents the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme; This represents the carbon emissions of the current design scheme during the construction phase. The amount of building material used during the construction phase. Let be the carbon emission factor during the production of the k-th building material; Let be the transportation distance of the k-th type of building material during the construction phase; Let be the carbon emission factor of the kth type of building material during transportation; Let y be the number of shifts for the y-th type of construction machinery during the construction phase. Let y be the energy consumption per shift for the y-th type of construction machinery. The carbon emission factor of the energy used by the y-th type of construction machinery; This represents the carbon emissions of the current design scheme during the repair phase. Indicates the volume of a continuous segment; Indicates the volume of the node segment; The carbon emission baseline value for a continuous section is obtained by summing the carbon emission values ​​of building materials, transportation, and construction in the continuous section. The carbon emission value of building materials in a continuous section refers to the product of the amount of each building material used in the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during production in the repair process of a continuous section. The carbon emission value of continuous segment transportation refers to the product of the transportation distance of each building material during the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during transportation in the continuous segment repair process; The carbon emission value of construction in a continuous section refers to the product of the number of shifts of each type of construction machinery during the repair phase and the carbon emission factor of the energy used by the construction machinery in the repair process of a continuous section. The carbon emission baseline value for the node section is obtained by summing the carbon emission values ​​of building materials, transportation, and construction in the node section. The carbon emission value of building materials in a node section refers to the product of the amount of each building material used in the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during production in the repair process of the node section. The carbon emission value of transportation in a node section refers to the product of the transportation distance of each building material during the repair stage and the carbon emission factor of each building material during transportation in the repair process of the node section. The construction carbon emission value of a node section refers to the product of the number of shifts of each type of construction machinery during the repair phase and the carbon emission factor of the energy used by the construction machinery in the repair process of the node section.

4. The prefabricated wall design method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The comprehensive evaluation model is defined as follows: ； This represents the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme. The higher the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme, the weaker its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. The lower the overall evaluation value of the current design scheme, the stronger its performance in improving toughness, reducing total carbon emissions, and reducing total cost. X represents the current design scheme; , , These are the first weighting coefficient, the second weighting coefficient, and the third weighting coefficient, respectively. This indicates the toughness value of the current design scheme; the higher the toughness value of the current design scheme, the stronger the toughness recovery ability of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme; the lower the toughness value of the current design scheme, the weaker the toughness recovery ability of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. This indicates the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme; The larger the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme, the more greenhouse gas emissions the current design scheme will produce, and the greater its impact on the environment. The smaller the total carbon emissions of the current design scheme, the less greenhouse gas emissions the current design scheme will produce, and the smaller its impact on the environment. This indicates the total cost of the current design scheme; The higher the total cost of the current design scheme, the worse its economic efficiency. The lower the total cost of the current design scheme, the better its economic efficiency.

5. A prefabricated wall design device based on toughness value and cost, used to implement the prefabricated wall design method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that, Applied to electronic devices, including: The first acquisition module is used to acquire the current design scheme of the prefabricated wall, which consists of continuous sections and node sections; The second acquisition module is used to obtain the geometric dimensions, material parameters and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall from the design parameters of the current design scheme, input the geometric dimensions, material parameters and load boundary conditions of the prefabricated wall into the finite element analysis tool, and generate the damage volume of the continuous section and the damage volume of the nodal section through the finite element analysis tool. The first generation module is used to generate the repair duration of the continuous segment based on the damage volume of the continuous segment and the first duration model, generate the toughness repair rate of the continuous segment based on the repair duration of the continuous segment and the first toughness model, generate the repair duration of the node segment based on the damage volume of the node segment and the second duration model, and generate the toughness repair rate of the node segment based on the repair duration of the node segment and the second toughness model. The second generation module is used to select the minimum value between the toughness repair rate of the node section and the toughness repair rate of the continuous section as the toughness value of the current design scheme. Through the construction cost model, it generates the construction cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. Through the repair cost model, it generates the repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme. The design module is used to add the construction cost and repair cost of the prefabricated wall under the current design scheme to generate the total cost of the current design scheme. Through the carbon emission model, the total carbon emission of the current design scheme is generated. Based on the toughness value, the total carbon emission, the total cost, and the comprehensive evaluation model of the current design scheme, a comprehensive evaluation value of the current design scheme is generated. When the comprehensive evaluation value is less than the preset evaluation value, the current design scheme is selected as the target design scheme for the prefabricated wall.

6. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that, When the processor executes the computer program, it implements the prefabricated wall design method as described in any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images