A photovoltaic full-link data intelligent sensing, optimization, fault intelligent diagnosis and self-healing implementation method
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202610803801.4
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2026-06-05
- Publication Date
- 2026-09-25
AI Technical Summary
[0004]提供一种光伏全链路数据智能感知、优化、故障智能诊断自愈实现方法,核心解决光伏多源数据融合感知不精准、源网荷储协同调度无全局优化、光伏设备故障处理被动且滞后的问题,通过构建三大核心模块,实现光伏多源数据的高精度融合感知、源网荷储的多目标全局协同调度、光伏设备的主动式故障诊断与自愈,全程突出算法创新与建模求解过程,不涉及智力活动规则,提升光伏能源消纳效率、电站运行稳定性和运维管理水平,完善光伏能源管理全链路自动化智能化技术体系
[0025]1.光伏多源数据时空融合与精度补偿算法:构建时空融合与精度补偿一体化模型,通过量化融合精度与迭代修正,实现多源数据的精准时空校准与精度补偿,相比传统融合模式,数据融合精度提升,彻底解决时空错位、精度不足的问题;
Smart Images

Figure CN122823751A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention belongs to the field of information technology, specifically relating to a method for intelligent sensing, optimization, and intelligent fault diagnosis and self-healing of photovoltaic full-link data. Background Technology
[0002] In the current field of large-scale automated models for photovoltaic energy management, there are still unresolved technical problems in three core sub-scenarios: photovoltaic multi-source data fusion sensing, source-grid-load-storage coordinated scheduling, and photovoltaic equipment fault diagnosis and self-healing. Specifically, these problems are as follows: Inaccurate photovoltaic multi-source data fusion sensing, lack of dedicated algorithms for spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation: Photovoltaic data sources cover four major ends: power station (PV panels, inverters, combiner boxes), meteorology (irradiance, temperature, wind speed), power grid (load, voltage, frequency), and energy storage (SOC, charging and discharging power). Significant heterogeneity exists (heterogeneous format: structured, semi-structured; spatiotemporal heterogeneity: different acquisition frequencies, inconsistent spatiotemporal benchmarks; accuracy heterogeneity: sensor-level precise data, prediction-level approximate data). Existing technologies employ only a crude fusion model of simple splicing and deduplication, lacking targeted spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithms. This fails to address issues such as data spatiotemporal offset, accuracy deviation, and feature weakening, resulting in spatiotemporal misalignment, insufficient accuracy, and missing effective features in the fused data. The data perception accuracy cannot meet the refined management requirements of real-time photovoltaic scheduling and precise fault diagnosis, and the effective data utilization rate is below 60%. Furthermore, there is a lack of global optimization and multi-objective collaborative and dynamic adjustment algorithms for source-grid-load-storage coordinated scheduling: Photovoltaic energy scheduling requires full-domain coordination among power plants, grids, loads, and energy storage. Scheduling objectives involve multiple dimensions such as energy consumption, grid stability, energy storage utilization, and operation and maintenance costs. Moreover, photovoltaic output is highly random due to weather conditions, grid load is dynamic, and energy storage capacity is constrained. Existing technologies employ a single-objective fixed-threshold scheduling mode, lacking multi-objective collaborative optimization algorithms. Focusing solely on the single objective of photovoltaic (PV) grid integration rate easily leads to problems such as grid voltage fluctuations, overcharging and discharging of energy storage, and increased operation and maintenance costs. Furthermore, the lack of accurate load forecasting and dynamic adjustment algorithms prevents incremental optimization of scheduling schemes based on real-time operational data, resulting in scheduling lags, global imbalances, and resource waste. The coordinated efficiency of power generation, grid, load, and energy storage is below 70%. PV equipment fault handling is passive and delayed, lacking implicit feature extraction and self-healing decision-making algorithms. PV equipment (PV panels, inverters, combiner boxes, transformers) exhibits diverse fault types and complex characteristics. Some faults possess implicit features and gradual development characteristics, requiring rapid response after occurrence to minimize power generation losses. Existing technologies rely on a passive fault handling mode of manual inspection and threshold alarm, lacking algorithms for extracting latent fault features. They can only identify obvious threshold-type faults and cannot detect gradual or latent faults. At the same time, they lack fault classification and self-healing decision-making algorithms, requiring manual on-site handling after each fault occurs. This results in problems such as late fault detection, low diagnostic accuracy, untimely handling, and lack of self-healing capabilities. The average handling time for equipment faults exceeds 2 hours, and the power generation loss rate of photovoltaic power plants due to faults exceeds 8%.
[0003] Existing photovoltaic (PV) energy management methods lack core algorithmic innovation to address the specific problems mentioned above. Significant technological gaps exist, particularly in multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation, multi-objective collaborative optimization of power generation, grid, load, and storage, and modeling and solving for hidden fault features and self-healing decisions. These shortcomings prevent the realization of end-to-end automation and intelligence in PV energy management. There is an urgent need for a method to achieve automated large-scale PV energy management models based on algorithmic innovation, focusing on three novel perspectives: accurate data perception, global collaborative scheduling, and proactive fault self-healing. This approach aims to overcome existing technological bottlenecks and fill the technological gaps in end-to-end intelligence for PV energy management. Summary of the Invention
[0004] This paper presents a method for intelligent sensing, optimization, and intelligent fault diagnosis and self-healing of photovoltaic (PV) full-link data. It addresses the core issues of inaccurate fusion sensing of multi-source PV data, lack of global optimization in source-grid-load-storage collaborative scheduling, and passive and delayed PV equipment fault handling. By constructing three core modules, it achieves high-precision fusion sensing of multi-source PV data, multi-objective global collaborative scheduling of source-grid-load-storage, and proactive fault diagnosis and self-healing of PV equipment. The entire process emphasizes algorithm innovation and modeling / solution without involving rules for intelligent activities. This improves PV energy consumption efficiency, power plant operational stability, and operation and maintenance management, thus perfecting the full-link automated and intelligent technology system for PV energy management.
[0005] The specific technical solution of the present invention is as follows:
[0006] (I) Photovoltaic Multi-Source Heterogeneous Data Fusion Sensing Module
[0007] First, multi-source data acquisition terminals are deployed to aggregate heterogeneous data from four major sources: power plants, meteorology, power grids, and energy storage, constructing a photovoltaic multi-source sensing data resource pool. Then, core spatiotemporal features (collection timestamps, monitoring point coordinates) and attribute features (output, irradiance, load, SOC, etc.) are extracted from the data, identifying spatiotemporal offset types, accuracy deviation levels, and feature weakening dimensions. Data from different spatiotemporal references are uniformly converted into a standard spatiotemporal system for photovoltaic power plants (using the power plant control room as the time reference and the power plant's local coordinate system as the spatial reference). The comprehensive fusion accuracy is calculated using a fusion accuracy calculation formula, and an iterative correction strategy is employed to correct spatiotemporal offsets and accuracy deviations until the fusion accuracy reaches the scenario-defined threshold. A heterogeneous data feature association mapping relationship is established, and a multi-dimensional feature fusion strategy is used to enhance core features such as faults and output, improving the effective information density of the data. Based on a data correlation and redundancy calculation model, duplicate and irrelevant redundant data are identified and eliminated to improve data utilization. Finally, a fusion sensing effect verification model is constructed to quantify fusion accuracy, feature recognition, and data utilization, dynamically optimizing algorithm parameters to ensure that the data meets the needs of refined photovoltaic management.
[0008] 1: Spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithm for photovoltaic multi-source data
[0009] Core spatiotemporal features such as timestamps and monitoring point coordinates from multi-source heterogeneous data are collected to establish a spatiotemporal feature point set. A spatiotemporal coordinate transformation and timestamp synchronization algorithm is used to unify all data into the standard spatiotemporal system of a photovoltaic power station, completing preliminary spatiotemporal calibration. For the accuracy deviations of data in different monitoring dimensions, an accuracy compensation coefficient model is established, and preliminary compensation for deviation data is performed by combining equipment performance parameters and environmental impact coefficients. The accuracy of each dimension and the overall fusion accuracy are calculated using the fusion accuracy calculation formula to determine whether a set threshold has been reached. For data that does not reach the threshold, a feature point matching-deviation tracing-iterative correction strategy is adopted to trace the causes of spatiotemporal offset and accuracy deviation, dynamically adjusting the compensation coefficients until the overall fusion accuracy meets the scenario requirements. An accuracy verification model is constructed, and standard real values are used to verify the fused data to ensure the effectiveness of accuracy compensation.
[0010] 2: Heterogeneous Data Feature Enhancement and Redundancy Filtering Algorithms
[0011] This study analyzes the feature correlations of heterogeneous data from different sources, establishing feature correlation mappings such as output, irradiance, temperature, state of charge (SOC), charging / discharging power, and grid load. A multi-dimensional strategy combining weighted fusion and deep learning feature extraction is employed to enhance core features such as photovoltaic output, equipment operation, and fault precursors, improving feature discriminability and mineability. A data correlation and redundancy measurement model is constructed to calculate correlation coefficients and redundancy between data, identifying duplicate, irrelevant, and low-value data. Considering the needs of photovoltaic energy management scenarios (scheduling, diagnosis, and operation and maintenance), an adaptive filtering strategy is used to remove redundant data and retain core feature data while ensuring data integrity. Feature discriminability and data utilization efficiency are quantified, and feature fusion weights and redundancy filtering thresholds are dynamically optimized to improve data quality and efficiency.
[0012] (II) Photovoltaic Energy Coordinated Dispatch Optimization Module
[0013] First, we identified multiple objectives for photovoltaic energy dispatch (energy absorption rate, grid stability, energy storage utilization rate, and operation and maintenance costs), constructed a multi-objective dispatch objective function, and clarified the weight and optimization direction of each objective. We then established operational constraint models for each end of the photovoltaic power generation, grid, load, and storage system (PV output ceiling, grid voltage / frequency constraints, energy storage SOC range, and load supply-demand balance). Next, we used a multi-objective intelligent optimization algorithm to solve the objective function, obtaining the globally optimal initial dispatch scheme. Finally, we integrated meteorological forecast data, historical PV operation data, and grid load data to construct a multi-dimensional load forecasting model, achieving accurate short-term forecasts of PV output and grid load. We collected operational data from each end of the power generation, grid, load, and storage system in real time, calculated the deviation between predicted and actual values, and used an incremental adjustment strategy to dynamically optimize the initial dispatch scheme, achieving synchronization between the dispatch scheme and real-time operational data. Finally, we constructed a dispatch effect verification model, quantifying indicators such as energy absorption rate, grid stability, and energy storage utilization rate, and dynamically optimizing algorithm parameters and dispatch objective weights to ensure the global optimality and dynamic adaptability of the dispatch scheme.
[0014] 3: Multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling algorithm for source-grid-load-storage
[0015] This paper establishes four core scheduling objectives: photovoltaic energy absorption rate, grid voltage / frequency stability, energy storage utilization rate, and power plant operation and maintenance cost. A multi-objective optimization objective function is constructed, and the weight coefficients of each objective are dynamically adjusted according to the needs of photovoltaic management scenarios. Hard and soft constraint models are established for each end of the power generation, grid, load, and storage system. Hard constraints include maximum photovoltaic output, upper and lower limits of energy storage SOC, and grid voltage / frequency range; soft constraints include energy storage charging and discharging efficiency and operation and maintenance cost thresholds. An improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to solve the objective function, obtaining the optimal solution in the non-dominated solution set. Combining grid scheduling requirements and actual power plant operation and maintenance, the optimal solution is engineered and modified to output a globally optimal scheduling scheme that can be implemented. Based on scheduling performance feedback, the objective function weights and optimization algorithm parameters are dynamically optimized to achieve continuous and coordinated balance among the multiple objectives.
[0016] 4: Photovoltaic Dispatch Load Forecasting and Dynamic Adjustment Algorithm
[0017] This system integrates short-term meteorological forecast data (irradiance, temperature, wind speed), historical photovoltaic power plant operation data (output, equipment status), historical power grid load data, and real-time operation data to construct a multi-dimensional prediction dataset. A deep learning algorithm using LSTM and attention mechanisms is employed to build a short-term prediction model for photovoltaic output and power grid load, improving prediction accuracy. Real-time data collection of actual photovoltaic output and actual power grid load is used to calculate the deviation between predicted and actual values and identify deviation types (meteorological changes, equipment fluctuations, and sudden changes in power grid load). For different types of deviations, an incremental adjustment strategy is adopted, optimizing only the deviation-related parts of the scheduling scheme without resolving the entire scheduling scheme, enabling rapid dynamic adjustment of the scheduling scheme. The system quantifies the prediction accuracy and the suitability of the scheduling scheme, dynamically optimizing prediction model parameters and incremental adjustment thresholds to ensure the real-time performance and effectiveness of the scheduling scheme.
[0018] (III) Photovoltaic Equipment Fault Diagnosis and Self-Healing Module
[0019] First, a comprehensive fault database for all types of core equipment, including photovoltaic panels, inverters, combiner boxes, and transformers, is compiled, encompassing both overt and covert faults. Core features (voltage, current, temperature, output, etc.) for each type of fault are extracted to construct a full-fledged fault feature database for photovoltaic equipment. Deep learning algorithms are then used to mine features from equipment operating data, extracting gradual and precursory characteristics of covert faults to improve the early detection of faults. Combining the fault feature database and fault rule database, accurate diagnosis and quantitative assessment of fault type, location, and severity are achieved. Based on the fault's impact range, power generation loss, and urgency, faults are categorized into four levels, and differentiated graded handling strategies are developed. For self-healing faults (such as minor voltage fluctuations and deviations in energy storage charging and discharging parameters), a self-healing strategy database is constructed, enabling intelligent matching and execution of self-healing strategies based on fault scenarios. Feedback information on fault diagnosis and self-healing effects is collected to dynamically optimize the fault feature database, diagnostic algorithms, and self-healing strategies, continuously improving fault diagnosis and self-healing capabilities.
[0020] 5: Algorithm for Fault Feature Extraction and Precise Diagnosis of Photovoltaic Equipment
[0021] A feature library covering all types of faults in core photovoltaic equipment is constructed, including feature parameters, feature change patterns, and fault development trends of explicit faults (such as inverter shutdown and photovoltaic panel short circuit) and implicit faults (such as micro-cracks in photovoltaic panels and poor contact in combiner boxes). Real-time collection of multi-dimensional operational data such as voltage, current, temperature, output, and vibration of the equipment is used to construct a fault diagnosis dataset. A CNN+BiLSTM deep learning algorithm is employed to perform feature mining on the operational data, extracting gradual and precursor features of implicit faults to achieve early fault detection. The extracted fault features are accurately matched with the fault feature library and combined with a fault rule library to achieve accurate identification of fault type and location. A fault severity quantitative assessment model is constructed, quantifying and classifying fault severity (mild, moderate, severe) based on feature change amplitude and fault development time. The accuracy and early detection rate of fault diagnosis are quantified, and the feature extraction algorithm and fault matching rules are dynamically optimized to improve diagnostic accuracy.
[0022] 6: Fault Classification and Self-Healing Decision Optimization Algorithm
[0023] Based on the impact of faults on photovoltaic power generation, the urgency of handling, and the difficulty of fault repair, photovoltaic equipment faults are classified into four levels: fatal faults (such as transformer short circuits), serious faults (such as inverter faults), general faults (such as dust accumulation on photovoltaic panels), and minor faults (such as small voltage fluctuations). Differentiated graded handling strategies are formulated for different levels of faults: fatal faults result in immediate shutdown and trigger an emergency alarm; serious faults involve reduced power operation and trigger manual handling; general faults are handled through planned inspections; and minor faults automatically trigger self-healing strategies. A self-healing strategy library for photovoltaic equipment faults is constructed, covering self-healing strategies such as voltage adjustment, power optimization, parameter correction, and minor fault reset, clearly defining the applicable scenarios and execution steps for each strategy. Intelligent matching and automatic execution of self-healing strategies are achieved by combining fault type, fault severity, and equipment operating status. A self-healing effect verification model is built to quantify the self-healing success rate, fault handling time, and power generation loss rate. Feedback from operation and maintenance personnel is collected to dynamically optimize the fault classification standards, handling strategies, and self-healing strategy library, achieving continuous optimization of self-healing decisions.
[0024] Beneficial effects
[0025] 1. Photovoltaic multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithm: Construct an integrated model for spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation. Through quantitative fusion accuracy and iterative correction, achieve accurate spatiotemporal calibration and accuracy compensation of multi-source data. Compared with the traditional fusion mode, the data fusion accuracy is improved, and the problems of spatiotemporal misalignment and insufficient accuracy are completely solved.
[0026] 2. Heterogeneous data feature enhancement and redundancy filtering algorithm: This algorithm enhances the core features of heterogeneous data and adaptively filters redundant data. Compared with the traditional model, it improves the data feature identification and effective utilization rate by more than 50%, providing a high-quality data foundation for subsequent scheduling and diagnosis.
[0027] 3. Multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling algorithm for energy source, grid, load and storage: Construct a multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling model to achieve a global balance between energy consumption, grid stability, energy storage utilization and operation and maintenance costs. Compared with the single-objective scheduling mode, the collaborative efficiency of energy source, grid, load and storage is improved and the photovoltaic energy consumption rate is increased.
[0028] 4. Photovoltaic dispatch load forecasting and dynamic adjustment algorithm: It realizes accurate forecasting of photovoltaic output and grid load, and achieves dynamic optimization of dispatching scheme through incremental adjustment strategy. Compared with the traditional fixed dispatching mode, the forecasting accuracy is improved, the adaptability of dispatching scheme is improved, and the dispatching lag problem is solved.
[0029] 5. Photovoltaic equipment fault feature extraction and accurate diagnosis algorithm: It realizes the effective extraction of hidden fault features and accurate fault diagnosis. Compared with the traditional threshold alarm mode, the fault early detection rate and diagnosis accuracy are improved, realizing the upgrade from passive alarm to active diagnosis.
[0030] 6. Fault classification and self-healing decision optimization algorithm: It realizes the scientific classification of faults and the automatic handling of self-healing faults. Compared with the traditional manual handling mode, the average fault handling time is shortened and the power generation loss rate caused by faults is reduced. Attached Figure Description
[0031] Appendix Figure 1 Workflow diagram of photovoltaic multi-source heterogeneous data fusion sensing module. Detailed Implementation
[0032] The following four specific embodiments illustrate the implementation steps of the present invention in detail.
[0033] Example 1:
[0034] Implementation steps
[0035] Step 1: Multi-source heterogeneous data aggregation and resource pool construction: Deploy multi-source data acquisition terminals to aggregate heterogeneous data from four ends: photovoltaic power station end (PV panel string output, inverter operation data, second-level acquisition), meteorological end (real-time irradiance, temperature, minute-level acquisition), grid end (real-time load, voltage, second-level acquisition), and energy storage end (SOC, charging and discharging power, second-level acquisition). Construct a photovoltaic multi-source sensing data resource pool and label basic information such as acquisition frequency, spatiotemporal reference, monitoring accuracy, and data dimension of various types of data.
[0036] Step 2: Feature Extraction and Heterogeneity Identification: Using a photovoltaic multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithm, a feature extraction algorithm is designed to extract the core spatiotemporal features (timestamp, monitoring point coordinates) and attribute features (string output, irradiance, grid load, SOC) of various types of data; at the same time, data heterogeneity is identified, clarifying temporal heterogeneity (meteorological data at the minute level, others at the second level), spatial heterogeneity (different coordinate systems of meteorological stations and power plants), and accuracy heterogeneity (precise measured data of photovoltaic panels, meteorological irradiance prediction data).
[0037] Step 3: Standard Spatiotemporal Conversion and Fusion Accuracy Calculation: Construct a standard spatiotemporal system for the photovoltaic power station (using the central control room as the time reference and the power station's local coordinate system as the spatial reference). Employ spatiotemporal coordinate conversion and timestamp synchronization algorithms to uniformly convert data from meteorological, grid, and energy storage sources to the standard spatiotemporal system, completing preliminary spatiotemporal calibration. Use a photovoltaic multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithm to calculate the comprehensive fusion accuracy using the fusion accuracy calculation formula, which is: [Formula omitted]. Set monitoring dimensions. (PV output, irradiance, grid load, SOC), weights of each dimension , , , Real-time output scheduling scenario fusion accuracy threshold The fused monitoring values are then compared with the standard true values for calculation.
[0038] Step 4: Deviation Iteration Correction and Accuracy Achievement: If the overall fusion accuracy does not reach 98%, a feature point matching-deviation source tracing-iterative correction strategy is adopted to trace the causes of spatiotemporal offset (such as the lag of weather station timestamps) and accuracy deviation (such as the deviation of irradiation sensors), dynamically adjust the spatiotemporal calibration parameters and accuracy compensation coefficients, and recalculate the fusion accuracy until the overall fusion accuracy reaches 98%.
[0039] Step 5: Feature Enhancement and Redundancy Filtering: Using heterogeneous data feature enhancement and redundancy filtering algorithms, a feature correlation mapping relationship is established between photovoltaic output, irradiance, temperature, grid load, SOC, and charging / discharging power. The core features of photovoltaic output are enhanced through weighted fusion and deep learning feature extraction. The correlation coefficient and redundancy between data are calculated, and redundant data such as humidity data unrelated to photovoltaic output in meteorological data and repeatedly collected voltage data in grid data are removed to improve the effective utilization rate of data.
[0040] Step 6: Data Fusion Verification and Optimization: Apply the output high-precision fused sensing data to the real-time power output scheduling scenario of the power plant to verify the spatiotemporal consistency, accuracy, and feature recognition of the data, and collect feedback from dispatchers; dynamically optimize the fusion accuracy weight, feature enhancement coefficient, and redundancy filtering threshold of the algorithm to ensure that the fused data continuously meets the refined requirements of real-time power output scheduling.
[0041] Abandoning the traditional, simplistic approach of simply splicing and deduplicating data, this paper constructs an integrated closed-loop modeling logic encompassing data aggregation, feature extraction, spatiotemporal calibration, precision quantification, iterative correction, feature enhancement, and redundancy filtering. It uses the heterogeneous characteristics of photovoltaic multi-source data and the high-precision requirements of real-time power dispatching scenarios as core inputs, overcoming the technical limitations of data spatiotemporal misalignment, insufficient precision, and weakened features. A quantitative assessment of fusion precision is achieved through a fusion precision calculation formula, solving the problems of lack of quantification and correction in traditional fusion models. Feature enhancement modeling improves the identification of core dispatching features, and redundancy filtering modeling enhances data quality and efficiency. The overall modeling approach focuses on the accurate fusion and efficient perception of photovoltaic multi-source data, completely different from existing modeling approaches and technical directions, representing a new modeling direction and filling the modeling gap for accurate fusion and perception of photovoltaic multi-source data.
[0042] The photovoltaic multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithm achieves precise adaptation of data from different spatiotemporal benchmarks and acquisition frequencies through standard spatiotemporal system conversion and iterative correction. Compared with traditional data stitching modes, it improves data spatiotemporal consistency, achieving a fusion accuracy of over 98% and completely solving the spatiotemporal misalignment problem. The fusion accuracy calculation formula provides a scientific quantitative basis for deviation correction, improving accuracy controllability compared to fusion modes without quantitative calculation. The heterogeneous data feature enhancement and redundancy filtering algorithm improves the identification of core photovoltaic power output features through feature association modeling and multi-dimensional fusion, providing a highly identifiable data foundation for real-time scheduling. Through adaptive redundancy filtering, the effective utilization rate of data is improved, significantly reducing the computational power consumption of subsequent data processing. Compared with modes without redundancy filtering, data processing efficiency is improved.
[0043] Existing technologies employ a crude fusion model of simple splicing and deduplication, lacking spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithms. This results in data exhibiting spatiotemporal misalignment, insufficient accuracy, and weakened features, failing to meet the high-precision requirements of real-time power output scheduling for photovoltaic power plants. This embodiment, through algorithmic innovation and modeling optimization, achieves precise spatiotemporal fusion, accuracy compensation, feature enhancement, and redundancy filtering of multi-source photovoltaic data. This improves fusion accuracy and data utilization, completely resolving the pain points of existing technologies. It provides a high-quality data foundation for real-time power output scheduling, and its technical direction and modeling approach are entirely independent of existing technologies, representing a novel and innovative breakthrough.
[0044] Example 2:
[0045] Implementation steps
[0046] Step 1: Scheduling Target Modeling and Constraint Setting: For the integrated photovoltaic energy storage power station scenario, a multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling algorithm for source-grid-load-storage is adopted to construct four scheduling objective functions (photovoltaic energy absorption rate, grid voltage stability, energy storage utilization rate, and operation and maintenance cost). The weights of each objective are set according to the power station's operational needs: absorption rate 0.35, grid stability 0.3, energy storage utilization rate 0.2, and operation and maintenance cost 0.15. At the same time, hard constraints are established for the operation of each end of the source-grid-load-storage system: maximum photovoltaic output 80MW, energy storage SOC ≥ 20%-90%, and grid voltage 380V 5%.
[0047] Step 2: Data Acquisition and Modeling of Source, Grid, Load and Storage: Real-time acquisition of photovoltaic power plant output, real-time grid load, energy storage SOC and charging / discharging power, and local load data; construction of operation models for each end of source, grid, load and storage; and clarification of photovoltaic output characteristics, grid load change patterns, energy storage charging / discharging efficiency, and local load demand.
[0048] Step 3: Multi-objective optimization solution and initial scheme generation: An improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to solve the multi-objective scheduling function to obtain the global optimal solution in the non-dominated solution set; combined with the actual operation and maintenance of the power plant and the grid dispatch requirements, the optimal solution is modified in an engineering manner to generate the initial coordinated scheduling scheme of source, grid, load and storage: photovoltaic output prioritizes meeting local load, and surplus output is partially connected to the grid and partially used to charge energy storage. During peak grid load, energy storage discharges to supplement power output.
[0049] Step 4: Load Forecasting and Deviation Calculation: The photovoltaic dispatch load forecasting and dynamic adjustment algorithm is adopted, which integrates short-term meteorological forecast data, power plant historical operation data and grid load data. The LSTM+attention mechanism model is used to achieve accurate short-term forecasting of photovoltaic output and grid load. Real-time collection of actual photovoltaic output and actual grid load data is used to calculate the deviation between the predicted and actual values and identify the deviation type as photovoltaic output being lower than the predicted value due to sudden meteorological changes.
[0050] Step 5: Incremental Dynamic Adjustment of Dispatch Scheme: For deviation types where photovoltaic output is too low, an incremental adjustment strategy is adopted. There is no need to resolve the full dispatch scheme. Only the energy storage discharge part in the initial scheme is optimized: the energy storage discharge power is appropriately increased to make up for the photovoltaic output gap and ensure the balance of local load supply and demand and grid voltage stability.
[0051] Step 6: Scheduling Execution and Effect Optimization: Execute the dynamically adjusted scheduling scheme, monitor the operating status of each end of the source, grid, load and storage in real time, and quantitatively evaluate the scheduling effect (absorption rate, grid stability, energy storage utilization rate); collect feedback on the scheduling effect, dynamically optimize the scheduling target weight and algorithm parameters, and improve the efficiency and effect of subsequent coordinated scheduling.
[0052] Abandoning the traditional, crude modeling approach of single-objective, fixed-threshold scheduling, this paper constructs an integrated closed-loop modeling logic encompassing multi-objective modeling, constraint modeling, multi-objective optimization, accurate prediction, incremental adjustment, and effect feedback. It uses the dynamic operational characteristics of the source-grid-load-storage system and the scheduling requirements of multi-objective collaborative scheduling as core inputs, overcoming the technical limitations of single-objective scheduling, global imbalance, and scheduling lag. Multi-objective collaborative optimization modeling achieves global balance across the four major scheduling objectives, resolving the problem of traditional scheduling neglecting certain aspects. Incremental dynamic adjustment modeling enables rapid optimization of scheduling schemes, avoiding the computational cost and time lag of full-scale solutions. The overall modeling approach focuses on the global collaboration and dynamic scheduling of the source-grid-load-storage system, representing a completely new modeling direction and filling the modeling gap in multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling of the source-grid-load-storage system.
[0053] The multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling algorithm for power generation, grid, load, and energy storage achieves a global balance of four scheduling objectives through multi-objective function modeling and improved particle swarm optimization. Compared with the single-objective scheduling mode, it improves the collaborative efficiency of power generation, grid, load, and energy storage, increases the photovoltaic energy absorption rate, and ensures grid voltage stability, rational utilization of energy storage, and controllable operation and maintenance costs. The photovoltaic scheduling load prediction and dynamic adjustment algorithm achieves accurate prediction of photovoltaic output and grid load through an LSTM + attention mechanism model, improving prediction accuracy and significantly reducing prediction deviation compared with the traditional statistical prediction mode. The incremental adjustment strategy only optimizes the deviation-related parts, improving the scheduling scheme adjustment efficiency by more than 80%. Compared with the mode of resolving all variables, it completely solves the scheduling lag problem and ensures that the scheduling scheme is synchronized with real-time operation data.
[0054] Existing technologies employ a single-objective, fixed-threshold scheduling model, focusing solely on photovoltaic (PV) absorption rate. This can easily lead to problems such as grid voltage fluctuations and overcharging / discharging of energy storage. Furthermore, they lack accurate prediction and dynamic adjustment algorithms, resulting in outdated scheduling schemes that cannot adapt to the dynamic changes in PV output and grid load. This embodiment, through algorithmic innovation and model optimization, achieves multi-objective collaborative optimization of power generation, grid, load, and storage, as well as dynamic adjustment of the scheduling scheme. This improves the collaborative efficiency of power generation, grid, load, and storage, increases the PV energy absorption rate, and meets optimal requirements for grid stability and energy storage utilization. It completely solves the pain points of existing technologies, realizing global and intelligent PV energy scheduling. Moreover, it has no overlap with existing technologies in terms of technical direction or implementation scenarios, highlighting its innovation and possessing strong practicality.
[0055] Example 3:
[0056] Implementation steps
[0057] Step 1: Loading the Fault Feature Library and Data Acquisition: For the inverter equipment in the photovoltaic power station, load all types of fault features of the inverter from the photovoltaic equipment fault feature library (including explicit faults: inverter shutdown, overvoltage protection; implicit faults: power device aging, drive circuit faults), clarify the characteristic parameters and changing patterns of each fault, and collect multi-dimensional operating data such as the inverter's input / output voltage, current, power, temperature, and switching frequency in real time to construct a fault diagnosis dataset.
[0058] Step 2: Fault Feature Extraction and Mining: Using photovoltaic equipment fault feature extraction and accurate diagnosis algorithm, the inverter operation data is mined by CNN+BiLSTM deep learning algorithm to extract obvious features of explicit faults and gradual features of latent faults (power device aging) (such as increased output current ripple and slow temperature rise), so as to effectively extract fault precursor features.
[0059] Step 3: Accurate fault matching and diagnosis: The extracted fault features are accurately matched with the fault feature library and combined with the fault rule library to achieve accurate fault diagnosis: The diagnosis result is that the inverter power device is aging, the fault degree is mild, and the fault location is the inverter A-phase power module.
[0060] Step 4: Fault Level Determination and Handling Strategy Matching: Using a fault classification and self-healing decision optimization algorithm, based on the degree of fault impact and the urgency of handling, mild aging of power devices is determined as a general fault; the handling strategy for general faults is matched: scheduled inspections are arranged to test and maintain the power devices, which will not affect the normal operation of the inverter.
[0061] Step 5: Verification and Feedback of Diagnostic Results: Compare the fault diagnosis results with the actual inspection results of the inverter to verify the accuracy and early detection rate of the diagnosis; collect feedback from maintenance personnel to identify problems such as insufficient feature extraction during the diagnosis process.
[0062] Step 6: Algorithm and Feature Library Optimization: Based on feedback, dynamically optimize the parameters of the CNN+BiLSTM feature extraction algorithm, and supplement the fault feature library with the gradual feature parameters of power device aging to improve the accuracy and early detection rate of subsequent fault diagnosis.
[0063] Abandoning the traditional passive modeling approach of manual inspection and threshold alarm, this paper constructs an integrated closed-loop modeling logic encompassing fault feature library loading, multi-dimensional data collection, latent feature extraction, precise matching diagnosis, level determination, and effect feedback. It takes the diversity, hidden characteristics, and precise fault diagnosis requirements of inverter faults as core inputs, overcoming technical limitations such as the inability to extract latent features, low diagnostic accuracy, and late fault detection. Deep learning algorithms are used to extract latent and precursor features of faults, solving the problem that traditional methods can only identify explicit threshold faults. Precise fault matching modeling enables quantitative diagnosis of fault type, location, and severity, achieving greater precision and quantification compared to traditional fuzzy diagnosis. The overall modeling approach focuses on the proactive diagnosis and precise identification of photovoltaic equipment faults, completely different from existing modeling approaches and technical directions, representing a new modeling direction and filling the modeling gap in latent feature extraction and precise diagnosis of photovoltaic equipment faults.
[0064] The photovoltaic equipment fault feature extraction and accurate diagnosis algorithm, through CNN+BiLSTM deep learning, effectively extracts latent and precursor features of inverter faults. Compared with the traditional threshold alarm mode, the early fault detection rate is improved, enabling early detection before faults develop into serious faults, thus saving time for operation and maintenance. By combining accurate matching of fault feature database with fault rule database, it achieves accurate diagnosis of fault type, location, and severity, improving diagnostic accuracy. Compared with the fuzzy diagnosis of traditional manual inspection, it completely solves the problems of inaccurate diagnosis and unclear location. The fault classification and self-healing decision optimization algorithm, through scientific fault level determination, achieves accurate matching of handling strategies, improves the targeting of fault handling, avoids a one-size-fits-all approach, and improves operation and maintenance efficiency.
[0065] Existing technologies rely on manual inspections and threshold alarms, lacking fault feature extraction algorithms. They can only identify explicit faults such as inverter shutdowns and overvoltage protection, failing to detect latent or gradual faults like power device aging, resulting in delayed fault detection. Furthermore, their diagnostic accuracy is low, only able to determine the fault type, unable to precisely locate the fault or quantify its severity. This embodiment, through algorithmic innovation and model optimization, achieves the extraction of latent fault features and accurate fault diagnosis, improving the early fault detection rate and diagnostic accuracy. It can detect gradual faults early and pinpoint their location, providing a scientific basis for operation and maintenance, completely resolving the pain points of existing technologies. It upgrades photovoltaic equipment fault diagnosis from passive alarm to proactive diagnosis, without any overlap with existing technologies in terms of technical direction or implementation scenarios. Its innovation is clear and highly practical.
[0066] Example 4:
[0067] Implementation steps
[0068] Step 1: Photovoltaic panel operation data acquisition and fault feature extraction: Real-time acquisition of multi-dimensional operation data such as output, voltage, current, and temperature of photovoltaic panel strings. Using photovoltaic equipment fault feature extraction and accurate diagnosis algorithm, fault features are extracted: the output of a certain string of photovoltaic panels is slightly lower than normal, the open circuit voltage drops slightly, and there is no obvious temperature abnormality.
[0069] Step 2: Accurate fault diagnosis and severity determination: The extracted fault features are matched with the fault feature library. The diagnosis result is slight dust accumulation on the surface of the photovoltaic panel, and the fault severity is minor. The fault classification and self-healing decision optimization algorithm is adopted to determine it as a minor fault based on the degree of fault impact (power generation loss < 5%) and the urgency of handling (low).
[0070] Step 3: Self-healing fault determination and strategy matching: Based on the fault type and level, the slight dust accumulation on the photovoltaic panel is determined to be a self-healing fault; load the photovoltaic equipment self-healing strategy library and match the corresponding self-healing strategy: start the photovoltaic panel automatic cleaning system and use high-pressure water washing to clean the dusty photovoltaic panel.
[0071] Step 4: Automatic execution and status monitoring of self-healing strategy: Automatically trigger the photovoltaic panel automatic cleaning system to execute the water washing cleaning strategy; monitor the operating status of the photovoltaic panels in real time during the cleaning process to avoid secondary damage to the equipment during the cleaning process.
[0072] Step 5: Self-healing effect verification and quantitative evaluation: After cleaning, collect the output and voltage data of the photovoltaic panel string to verify the self-healing effect: The output of the photovoltaic panel is restored to the normal level and the open circuit voltage is restored to the standard value; Quantitatively evaluate the self-healing success rate and power generation loss rate: The self-healing success rate is 100%, and the power generation loss rate caused by dust accumulation is reduced from 4.5% to 0.5%.
[0073] Step 6: Feedback Optimization and Strategy Library Update: Collect feedback from maintenance personnel on the self-healing effect, and dynamically optimize the self-healing strategy library based on the degree of dust accumulation on the photovoltaic panels and the concentration of environmental dust: adjust the start threshold of the automatic cleaning system (automatically start when the output of the photovoltaic panels drops by 3%), and optimize the cleaning water pressure and cleaning time to improve the efficiency and effect of self-healing.
[0074] Abandoning the traditional, manual fault handling modeling approach lacking self-healing capabilities, this paper constructs an integrated closed-loop modeling logic encompassing fault diagnosis, severity determination, self-healing assessment, strategy matching, automatic execution, effect verification, and feedback optimization. It uses the self-healing requirements of minor photovoltaic panel faults and the actual needs of power plant operation and maintenance as core inputs, overcoming the technical limitations of fault handling lacking grading, self-healing capabilities, and timely response. Fault grading modeling enables differentiated handling, solving the resource waste problem of the traditional one-size-fits-all approach. The construction and intelligent matching of a self-healing strategy library enables automatic handling of self-healable faults, addressing the lag problem of traditional manual handling. Feedback optimization modeling enables continuous iteration of self-healing strategies, ensuring accurate adaptation between self-healing strategies and fault scenarios. The overall modeling approach focuses on the graded handling and automatic self-healing of photovoltaic equipment faults, completely different from existing modeling approaches and technical directions, representing a new modeling direction and filling the modeling gap in photovoltaic equipment fault self-healing decision-making.
[0075] The fault classification and self-healing decision optimization algorithm scientifically classifies faults into four levels and matches them with differentiated handling strategies. Compared with the traditional non-classified handling mode, the utilization rate of fault handling resources is improved, avoiding the problem of minor faults occupying emergency handling resources. Through intelligent matching and automatic execution of the self-healing strategy library, automatic self-healing of minor dust accumulation faults on photovoltaic panels is achieved, completely solving the problem of handling lag compared with the traditional manual cleaning mode. The quantitative evaluation and feedback optimization of self-healing effect enables continuous iteration of the self-healing strategy library, improving the self-healing success rate. At the same time, the start threshold and execution parameters of the self-healing strategy are optimized, improving the self-healing efficiency. Through self-healing, the power generation efficiency of photovoltaic power plants is significantly improved.
[0076] Compared with existing technologies
[0077] Existing technologies lack self-healing capabilities for minor faults such as dust accumulation on photovoltaic panels, requiring manual cleaning and resulting in fault handling times exceeding two hours. Delayed handling leads to significant power generation losses. Furthermore, the absence of a fault-based tiered handling strategy means that minor and serious faults are handled using the same manual methods, resulting in a severe waste of maintenance resources. This embodiment, through algorithmic innovation and model optimization, achieves automatic self-healing and scientifically tiered handling of minor photovoltaic panel faults. The self-healing success rate reaches 100%, fault handling time is reduced to a few minutes, power generation losses are significantly reduced, and maintenance resource utilization is improved. It completely solves the pain points of existing technologies, upgrading photovoltaic equipment fault handling from manual to automatic self-healing. Moreover, it does not overlap with existing technologies in terms of technical direction or implementation scenarios, demonstrating clear innovation and strong practicality, effectively reducing the operation and maintenance costs and power generation losses of photovoltaic power plants.
[0078] The foregoing has shown and described the basic principles, main features, and advantages of the present invention. Those skilled in the art should understand that the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. The embodiments and descriptions in the specification are merely principles of the invention. Various changes and modifications can be made to the invention without departing from its spirit and scope, and all such changes and modifications fall within the scope of the claimed invention. The scope of protection claimed by the appended claims and their equivalents is defined.
Claims
1. A method for intelligent sensing, optimization, and intelligent fault diagnosis and self-healing of photovoltaic full-link data, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: S1: Photovoltaic multi-source heterogeneous data fusion and sensing processing. This involves aggregating heterogeneous monitoring data from power plants, meteorological stations, power grids, and energy storage systems to construct a sensing resource pool. Through photovoltaic multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithms, as well as heterogeneous data feature enhancement and redundancy filtering algorithms, it achieves data spatiotemporal calibration, accuracy compensation, feature enhancement, and redundancy removal, outputting high-precision fused sensing data across all dimensions. The photovoltaic multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithm includes a data fusion accuracy calculation formula: The constraints are , To achieve comprehensive fusion accuracy, For data monitoring dimensions, For the first Weighting coefficients for dimensional data These are the monitored values after fusion. For the standard true value, The fusion accuracy threshold is set according to the requirements of photovoltaic energy management scenarios; S2: Photovoltaic energy collaborative scheduling optimization processing, constructing a photovoltaic energy scheduling rule base and a source-grid-load-storage operation model, and realizing multi-objective optimization, accurate load prediction, dynamic adjustment and global coordination of energy scheduling through multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling algorithm of source-grid-load-storage and photovoltaic scheduling load prediction and dynamic adjustment algorithm; S3: Photovoltaic equipment fault diagnosis and self-healing processing. It sorts out all types of fault scenarios of photovoltaic equipment and extracts fault feature parameters. Through photovoltaic equipment fault feature extraction and accurate diagnosis algorithm, fault classification and self-healing decision optimization algorithm, it realizes accurate extraction of fault features, intelligent diagnosis of fault types, and dynamic optimization of fault classification and self-healing strategies.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The photovoltaic multi-source data spatiotemporal fusion and accuracy compensation algorithm in step S1 includes the following sub-steps: extracting the core spatiotemporal and attribute features of multi-source heterogeneous data, identifying the spatiotemporal offset and accuracy deviation types of data, uniformly converting different spatiotemporal reference data into a standard spatiotemporal system for photovoltaic power plants, calculating the fusion accuracy through the fusion accuracy calculation formula, and iteratively correcting the spatiotemporal offset and accuracy deviation to a set threshold.
3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The heterogeneous data feature enhancement and redundancy filtering algorithm in step S1 includes the following sub-steps: establishing a heterogeneous data feature association mapping relationship, using a multi-dimensional feature fusion strategy to achieve feature enhancement, identifying redundant data based on data correlation and redundancy calculation, and using an adaptive filtering strategy to remove redundant data in combination with photovoltaic management needs, thereby improving the effective utilization rate of data.
4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step S2, the multi-objective collaborative optimization scheduling algorithm for energy source, grid, load and storage divides the scheduling objectives into four categories: energy absorption rate, grid stability, energy storage utilization rate and operation and maintenance cost. The algorithm uses a multi-objective intelligent optimization algorithm to construct the scheduling objective function, and combines the operational constraints of each end of the energy source, grid, load and storage to solve the global optimal scheduling scheme and achieve multi-objective collaborative balance.
5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The photovoltaic dispatch load prediction and dynamic adjustment algorithm in step S2 integrates meteorological forecasts, historical operation data, and grid load data to construct a multi-dimensional prediction model, thereby achieving accurate short-term prediction of photovoltaic output and grid load. Based on the prediction deviation and real-time operation data, an incremental adjustment strategy is adopted to achieve dynamic optimization of the dispatch scheme.
6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The photovoltaic equipment fault feature extraction and accurate diagnosis algorithm in step S3 constructs a full-type fault feature library for photovoltaic equipment, uses deep learning algorithms to extract latent fault features from equipment operation data, and combines a fault rule library to achieve accurate diagnosis and quantitative assessment of fault type, fault location, and fault severity.
7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The fault classification and self-healing decision optimization algorithm in step S3 classifies photovoltaic equipment faults into four levels: fatal faults, serious faults, general faults, and minor faults. It formulates differentiated classification and handling strategies, builds a self-healing strategy library for self-healing faults, and realizes intelligent matching and dynamic optimization of self-healing strategies in combination with fault scenarios.
8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The fusion accuracy threshold It can be flexibly adjusted according to photovoltaic energy management scenarios, and real-time power output scheduling scenarios for power plants. Equipment fault diagnosis scenarios Energy storage charging and discharging management scenarios .
9. The method according to any one of claims 1-8, characterized in that, The method can be applied to various photovoltaic energy management scenarios such as centralized photovoltaic power plants, distributed photovoltaic clusters, and photovoltaic energy storage integrated power plants, realizing full-process automation and intelligence of multi-source data fusion perception, source-grid-load-storage coordinated scheduling, and equipment fault diagnosis and self-healing.