Pipeline project evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The application provides a pipeline project evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium, relates to the long-distance pipeline branch line field, and can solve the problem that the evaluation result is inaccurate. The method comprises the following steps: based on the data of the pipeline project, determining the scores of a plurality of reference indexes of the pipeline project, the plurality of reference indexes comprising a natural gas supply index, a natural gas use index, a project competition index, a regional consumption index, a project investment index, an intention cooperation index, a positive index and a negative index; based on the scores of the plurality of reference indexes, determining the comprehensive score of the pipeline project; and based on the comprehensive score of the pipeline project, determining the feasibility of the pipeline project. The application can provide a basis for the evaluation of the pipeline project from multiple aspects, can improve the accuracy of the evaluation result, effectively help enterprises to reduce investment decision-making errors, and enhance the market competitiveness of the pipeline project.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of long-distance pipeline branch lines, and in particular to a pipeline project evaluation method, apparatus, electronic equipment and storage medium. Background Technology

[0002] In long-distance pipeline branch line projects, the feasibility assessment directly impacts the project's planning and investment decisions. Therefore, an accurate and comprehensive feasibility assessment is crucial.

[0003] Currently, project feasibility assessments often rely on a single factor. For example, they may assess a project's feasibility solely based on the initial investment cost of pipeline construction, or solely on resource supply prices.

[0004] However, this method has problems such as inaccurate evaluation results, which can cause economic losses to enterprises. Summary of the Invention

[0005] This application provides a pipeline project assessment method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium that can improve the accuracy of project assessment results.

[0006] To achieve the above objectives, this application adopts the following technical solution:

[0007] Firstly, this application provides a pipeline project evaluation method, which includes: determining scores for multiple reference indicators of the pipeline project based on pipeline project data. These multiple reference indicators include natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, cooperation intention indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators. Specifically, the natural gas supply indicator indicates the natural gas supply situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the natural gas usage indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project competition indicator indicates the market competition situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the regional consumption indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project investment indicator indicates the capital investment situation in the pipeline project; and the cooperation intention indicator indicates the cooperation intention situation in the pipeline project. Based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators, a comprehensive score for the pipeline project is determined. Finally, based on the comprehensive score of the pipeline project, the feasibility of the pipeline project is determined.

[0008] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, in one possible implementation, the comprehensive score of the pipeline project is determined based on the scores of multiple reference indicators, including: determining the weights corresponding to the multiple reference indicators; and performing a weighted summation based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators and the weights corresponding to the multiple reference indicators to obtain the comprehensive score of the pipeline project.

[0009] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, one possible implementation involves determining the weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators, including: determining the weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators based on principal component analysis.

[0010] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, in one possible implementation, the feasibility of a pipeline project is determined based on its comprehensive score, including: determining the pipeline project's feasibility level as Level 1 in response to its comprehensive score being greater than a first scoring threshold; determining the pipeline project's feasibility level as Level 2 in response to its comprehensive score being greater than a second scoring threshold and less than or equal to the first scoring threshold; determining the pipeline project's feasibility level as Level 3 in response to its comprehensive score being greater than a third scoring threshold and less than or equal to the second scoring threshold; and determining the pipeline project's feasibility level as Level 4 in response to its comprehensive score being less than or equal to the third scoring threshold. Wherein, the feasibility level of Level 1 is greater than that of Level 2, and the feasibility level of Level 2 is greater than that of Level 3, and the feasibility level of Level 3 is greater than that of Level 4.

[0011] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, in one possible implementation, the natural gas supply indicators include the natural gas supply price, the natural gas supply source, the gas storage status of the supply source, and the connection status of the supply source with external pipelines.

[0012] The process of determining the score for natural gas supply indicators includes: a score based on the supply price of natural gas, a score based on the source of natural gas supply, a score based on the gas storage conditions of the source of supply, and a score based on the connection between the source of supply and external pipelines.

[0013] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, in one possible implementation, natural gas usage indicators include residential gas usage indicators, public institution gas usage indicators, heating gas usage indicators, transportation gas usage indicators, industrial gas usage indicators, and direct supply indicators for large users.

[0014] The process of determining the scores for natural gas usage indicators includes: determining the scores for natural gas usage indicators based on scores for residential gas consumption indicators, public institution gas consumption indicators, heating gas consumption indicators, transportation gas consumption indicators, industrial gas consumption indicators, and direct supply to large users.

[0015] In conjunction with the first aspect above, in one possible implementation, the competitive indicators for the project include the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0016] The process of determining the project's competitive indicators includes: scoring the project's competitive indicators based on the competitor's total natural gas volume, the competitor's number of pipelines, the supplier's supply price, and the competitor's supply sources.

[0017] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, in one possible implementation, the regional consumption indicators include per capita income indicators, energy self-sufficiency indicators, residential gas distribution indicators, and industrial gas distribution indicators. Among them, the energy self-sufficiency indicator is used to indicate the energy production and consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located, the residential gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fee charged to residents in the region where the pipeline project is located, and the industrial gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fee charged to industrial users in the region where the pipeline project is located.

[0018] The process of determining the scores for regional consumption indicators includes: determining the scores for regional consumption indicators based on scores for per capita income indicators, energy self-sufficiency indicators, residential gas distribution indicators, and industrial gas distribution indicators.

[0019] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, in one possible implementation, the project investment indicators include the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project. The project turnover of the pipeline project is used to indicate the total amount of natural gas transported by the pipeline project through the pipeline, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project is used to indicate the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0020] The process of determining the scoring of project investment indicators includes: scoring based on the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0021] In conjunction with the first aspect mentioned above, in one possible implementation, the intended cooperation indicators include intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, intended cooperation indicators with industrial users, intended cooperation indicators with large direct supply users, and intended cooperation indicators with downstream users.

[0022] The process of determining the score of the intended cooperation indicator includes: determining the score of the intended cooperation indicator based on the scores of the intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, industrial users, large direct supply users, and downstream users.

[0023] Secondly, this application provides a pipeline project evaluation device, comprising: a first determining unit, configured to determine scores for multiple reference indicators of the pipeline project based on pipeline project data; the multiple reference indicators include natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, cooperation intention indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators, wherein the natural gas supply indicator indicates the natural gas supply situation in the region where the pipeline project is located, the natural gas usage indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located, the project competition indicator indicates the market competition situation in the region where the pipeline project is located, the regional consumption indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located, the project investment indicator indicates the capital investment situation of the pipeline project, and the cooperation intention indicator indicates the cooperation intention situation of the pipeline project; a second determining unit, configured to determine a comprehensive score for the pipeline project based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators; and a third determining unit, configured to determine the feasibility of the pipeline project based on the comprehensive score of the pipeline project.

[0024] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, the second determining unit is specifically used to: determine the weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators; and perform a weighted summation based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators and the weights corresponding to the multiple reference indicators to obtain a comprehensive score for the pipeline project.

[0025] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, the second determining unit is used to: determine the weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators based on principal component analysis.

[0026] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, the third determining unit is used to: determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a first level in response to the pipeline project's comprehensive score being greater than a first scoring threshold; determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a second level in response to the pipeline project's comprehensive score being greater than a second scoring threshold and less than or equal to the first scoring threshold; determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a third level in response to the pipeline project's comprehensive score being greater than a third scoring threshold and less than or equal to the second scoring threshold; and determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a fourth level in response to the pipeline project's comprehensive score being less than or equal to the third scoring threshold; wherein, the feasibility level of the first level is greater than the feasibility level of the second level, and the feasibility level of the second level is greater than the feasibility level of the third level, and the feasibility level of the third level is greater than the feasibility level of the fourth level.

[0027] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, natural gas supply indicators include the supply price of natural gas, the source of natural gas supply, the gas storage status of the source of supply, and the connection status of the source of supply with external pipelines;

[0028] The first determining unit is used to: determine the scores of natural gas supply indicators based on the scores of natural gas supply price, natural gas supply source, gas storage status of the supply source, and connection status between the supply source and external pipelines.

[0029] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, natural gas usage indicators include residential gas usage indicators, public institution gas usage indicators, heating gas usage indicators, transportation gas usage indicators, industrial gas usage indicators, and direct supply indicators for large users.

[0030] The first determining unit is used to: determine the score of natural gas usage indicators based on the scores of residential gas consumption indicators, public institution gas consumption indicators, heating gas consumption indicators, transportation gas consumption indicators, industrial gas consumption indicators, and direct supply large user indicators.

[0031] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, the competitive indicators for the project include the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0032] The first determining unit is used to: determine the scores of project competitiveness indicators based on the scores of the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0033] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, the regional consumption indicators include per capita income indicators, energy self-sufficiency indicators, residential gas distribution indicators, and industrial gas distribution indicators. Among them, the energy self-sufficiency indicator is used to indicate the energy production and consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located, the residential gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fee charged to residents in the region where the pipeline project is located, and the industrial gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fee charged to industrial users in the region where the pipeline project is located.

[0034] The first determining unit is used to determine the score of regional consumption indicators based on the scores of per capita income indicators, energy self-sufficiency indicators, residential gas distribution indicators, and industrial gas distribution indicators.

[0035] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, the project investment indicators include the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project. The project turnover of the pipeline project is used to indicate the total amount of natural gas transported by the pipeline project through the pipeline, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project is used to indicate the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0036] The first determining unit is used to: determine the project investment indicators based on the scoring of the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0037] In conjunction with the second aspect above, in one possible implementation, the intended cooperation indicators include intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, intended cooperation indicators with industrial users, intended cooperation indicators with large direct supply users, and intended cooperation indicators with downstream users.

[0038] The first determining unit is used to: determine the score of the intended cooperation indicator based on the scores of the intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, industrial users, large direct supply users, and downstream users.

[0039] Thirdly, this application provides an electronic device comprising: a processor and a communication interface; the communication interface and the processor are coupled, the processor being configured to run computer programs or instructions to implement the pipeline project evaluation method as described in the first aspect and any possible implementation thereof.

[0040] Fourthly, this application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed on an electronic device, cause the electronic device to perform the pipeline project evaluation method as described in the first aspect and any possible implementation thereof.

[0041] Fifthly, this application provides a computer program product containing instructions that, when run on an electronic device, cause the electronic device to perform the pipeline project evaluation method as described in the first aspect and any possible implementation thereof.

[0042] In a sixth aspect, this application provides a chip including a processor and a communication interface coupled to the processor, the processor being used to run computer programs or instructions to implement the pipeline project evaluation method as described in the first aspect and any possible implementation thereof.

[0043] Specifically, the chip provided in this application also includes a memory for storing computer programs or instructions.

[0044] It should be noted that the aforementioned computer instructions may be stored, in whole or in part, on a computer-readable storage medium. This computer-readable storage medium may be packaged together with the processor of the device, or it may be packaged separately from the processor of the device; this application does not impose any limitation on this.

[0045] The descriptions of the second to sixth aspects in this application can be referenced to the detailed description of the first aspect; and the beneficial effects of the descriptions of the second to sixth aspects can be referenced to the analysis of the beneficial effects of the first aspect, which will not be repeated here.

[0046] In this application, the name of the aforementioned pipeline project evaluation device does not limit the equipment or functional module itself. In actual implementation, these devices or functional modules may appear under other names. As long as the function of each device or functional module is similar to that of this application, it falls within the scope of the claims of this application and its equivalents.

[0047] These or other aspects of this application will become more readily apparent in the following description.

[0048] The above-mentioned solution brings at least the following beneficial effects: Based on the above technical solution, the pipeline project evaluation method provided in this application fully considers the natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, intended cooperation indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators of the pipeline project. It provides a basis for the evaluation of pipeline projects from multiple aspects. By combining the scores of multiple reference indicators to determine the comprehensive score of the pipeline project, it can improve the accuracy of the evaluation results, effectively help enterprises reduce investment decision-making errors, improve resource allocation efficiency, enhance the market competitiveness of pipeline projects, and promote the healthy and sustainable development of pipeline projects. Attached Figure Description

[0049] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a pipeline project evaluation architecture provided in this application embodiment;

[0050] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the hardware structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application;

[0051] Figure 3 A flowchart of a pipeline project evaluation method provided in this application embodiment;

[0052] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the multiple reference indicators provided for embodiments of this application;

[0053] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a pipeline project evaluation device provided in an embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0054] The technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0055] In this article, the term "and / or" is merely a description of the relationship between related objects, indicating that there can be three relationships. For example, A and / or B can represent three situations: A exists alone, A and B exist simultaneously, and B exists alone.

[0056] The terms "first" and "second," etc., used in the specification and drawings of this application are used to distinguish different objects or to distinguish different treatments of the same object, rather than to describe a specific order of objects.

[0057] Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, used in the description of this application are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, system, product, or apparatus that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the steps or units listed, but may optionally include other steps or units not listed, or may optionally include other steps or units inherent to such process, method, product, or apparatus.

[0058] It should be noted that in the embodiments of this application, the words "exemplary" or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations, or explanations. Any embodiment or design scheme described as "exemplary" or "for example" in the embodiments of this application should not be construed as being more preferred or advantageous than other embodiments or design schemes. Specifically, the use of the words "exemplary" or "for example" is intended to present the relevant concepts in a specific manner.

[0059] In the description of this application, unless otherwise stated, "a plurality of" means two or more.

[0060] In long-distance pipeline branch line projects, an accurate and comprehensive assessment of the project's feasibility directly impacts the project's planning and investment decisions.

[0061] Currently, project feasibility assessments often rely on a single factor. For example, assessing project feasibility solely based on the initial investment cost of pipeline construction ignores subsequent fluctuations in market demand, resource supply stability, and the impact of competitors during operation; or, assessing project feasibility solely based on resource supply prices ignores the actual growth potential of market demand in the project's location and potential price war strategies employed by competitors.

[0062] Furthermore, existing feasibility assessment methods fail to consider the impact of regional conditions on project feasibility. Different regions exhibit significant differences in economic development levels, energy consumption structures, and policy environments. Since existing methods do not take these factors into account, they cannot be adjusted accordingly, resulting in assessments that fail to accurately reflect the development potential and risks of the project's location. This exposes businesses to high uncertainty when making investment decisions, potentially leading to substantial economic losses.

[0063] To address the shortcomings of current project feasibility assessment methods, such as incomplete reference factors and inaccurate results, this application proposes a pipeline project assessment method. This method fully considers factors such as natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competitiveness indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, intended cooperation indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators. It provides a basis for pipeline project assessment from multiple perspectives. By combining the scores of multiple reference indicators, a comprehensive score for the pipeline project is determined. This method can improve the accuracy of assessment results, effectively help enterprises reduce investment decision-making errors, improve resource allocation efficiency, enhance the market competitiveness of pipeline projects, and promote the healthy and sustainable development of pipeline projects.

[0064] The embodiments of this application will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0065] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of a pipeline project evaluation architecture provided for an embodiment of this application. Figure 1 As shown, the architecture includes: terminal 101 and electronic device 102.

[0066] Terminal 101 can be at least one of the following devices: smartphone, smartwatch, desktop computer, laptop, virtual reality terminal, augmented reality terminal, wireless terminal, and laptop computer. This application embodiment does not limit this.

[0067] In some embodiments, terminal 101 has a storage function. For example, terminal 101 stores data on multiple pipeline projects. The data on pipeline projects may include pipe diameter, quantity, length, capital investment, engineering drawings, etc.

[0068] In other embodiments, terminal 101 has communication capabilities. For example, terminal 101 can send data about the pipeline project to electronic device 102 for processing.

[0069] It should be noted that the number of terminals 101 can be one or more. This application embodiment does not limit this.

[0070] Electronic device 102 can be a mobile phone, tablet, computer with wireless transceiver capabilities, virtual reality (VR) terminal, augmented reality (AR) terminal, wireless terminal, computer, independent physical server, server cluster consisting of multiple physical servers, or at least one of the following cloud servers providing basic cloud computing services: cloud services, cloud databases, cloud computing, cloud functions, cloud storage, network services, cloud communication, middleware services, domain name services, security services, content delivery networks, and big data or artificial intelligence platforms. This application embodiment does not limit this specific application. Of course, electronic device 102 can also include other functions to provide more comprehensive and diversified services.

[0071] In some embodiments, the electronic device 102 has communication capabilities. For example, communication between the electronic device 102 and the terminal 101.

[0072] In other embodiments, the electronic device 102 has processing capabilities. For example, the electronic device 102 can process data on the pipeline project to determine scores for multiple reference indicators of the pipeline project. Alternatively, the electronic device 102 can determine a comprehensive score for the pipeline project based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators. Yet another example is that the electronic device 102 can determine the feasibility of the pipeline project based on its comprehensive score.

[0073] The electronic device 102 can be one or more, and this embodiment of the application does not limit this. For ease of understanding, Figure 1 Only one is shown in the image.

[0074] Terminal 101 and electronic device 102 are connected via a communication link. This communication link can be a wired communication link or a wireless communication link, and this embodiment does not limit it.

[0075] When implemented in hardware, electronic devices can provide, for example... Figure 2 The hardware structure shown is, specifically, Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application. Figure 2 As shown, the electronic device includes at least one processor 201, a communication line 202, and at least one communication interface 204, and may also include a memory 203. The processor 201, memory 203, and communication interface 204 are connected via the communication line 202.

[0076] The processor 201 may be a central processing unit (CPU), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or one or more integrated circuits configured to implement the embodiments of this application, such as one or more digital signal processors (DSPs), or one or more field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs).

[0077] Communication line 202 is used to transmit information between the aforementioned components.

[0078] The communication interface 204 is used to communicate with other devices or communication networks. It can use any transceiver-like device, such as Ethernet, radio access network (RAN), wireless local area network (WLAN), etc.

[0079] The memory 203 may be a read-only memory (ROM) or other type of static storage device capable of storing static information and instructions, random access memory (RAM) or other type of dynamic storage device capable of storing information and instructions, or electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other optical disc storage, optical disc storage (including compressed optical discs, laser discs, optical discs, digital universal optical discs, Blu-ray discs, etc.), magnetic disk storage media or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium capable of including or storing desired program code having the form of instructions or data structures and accessible by a computer, but not limited thereto.

[0080] In one possible design, the memory 203 can exist independently of the processor 201, meaning the memory 203 can be an external memory of the processor 201. In this case, the memory 203 can be connected to the processor 201 via the communication line 202 to store execution instructions or application code, and its execution is controlled by the processor 201 to implement the pipeline project evaluation method provided in this application embodiment. In another possible design, the memory 203 can also be integrated with the processor 201, meaning the memory 203 can be an internal memory of the processor 201. For example, the memory 203 can be a cache, which can be used to temporarily store some data and instruction information.

[0081] As one possible implementation, processor 201 may include one or more CPUs, for example Figure 2 CPU0 and CPU1 in the example. As another possible implementation, the electronic device may include multiple processors, such as... Figure 2 The processors 201 and 207 are included. As another possible implementation, the electronic device may also include an output device 205 and an input device 206.

[0082] It should be noted that the various embodiments of this application can be referenced or learned from each other. For example, the same or similar steps, method embodiments, system embodiments and device embodiments can be referenced from each other without limitation.

[0083] Figure 3 A flowchart of a pipeline project evaluation method provided in this application embodiment is provided. This method can be applied to, for example... Figure 2 In the electronic device shown. For example... Figure 3 As shown, the method includes the following S301-S303.

[0084] S301. Electronic equipment determines the scores of multiple reference indicators for the pipeline project based on the data of the pipeline project.

[0085] The data for pipeline projects can include pipe diameter, quantity, length, capital investment, engineering drawings, etc.

[0086] Multiple reference indicators include natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, intended cooperation indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators.

[0087] Among them, the natural gas supply indicator indicates the natural gas supply situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the natural gas consumption indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project competition indicator indicates the market competition situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the regional consumption indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project investment indicator indicates the capital investment situation of the pipeline project; the cooperation intention indicator indicates the cooperation intention situation of the pipeline project; the positive indicator indicates the positive promotion of the pipeline project, and the higher the score of the positive indicator, the better the benefits and the lower the risk of the pipeline project; the negative indicator indicates the negative constraints on the pipeline project, and the higher the score of the negative indicator, the worse the benefits and the higher the risk of the pipeline project.

[0088] S302. Electronic equipment is scored based on multiple reference indicators to determine the overall score of the pipeline project.

[0089] For example, electronic devices can sum the scores of multiple reference indicators to obtain a comprehensive score for a pipeline project.

[0090] For another example, the electronic device calculates the average score of multiple reference indicators and uses the average score as the overall score of the pipeline project.

[0091] S303. Electronic equipment determines the feasibility of pipeline projects based on a comprehensive evaluation of the pipeline project.

[0092] In one possible implementation, the electronic device is pre-set with multiple feasibility levels. Different feasibility levels correspond to different degrees of feasibility for the pipeline project, and different comprehensive scores for different pipeline projects correspond to different feasibility levels. The electronic device obtains the feasibility level of the pipeline project based on its comprehensive score, and the feasibility level characterizes the feasibility of the pipeline project.

[0093] Based on the above technical solutions, and taking into full account the natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competitiveness indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, intended cooperation indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators of pipeline projects, the evaluation of pipeline projects is provided from multiple aspects. By combining the scores of multiple reference indicators to determine the comprehensive score of the pipeline project, the accuracy of the evaluation results can be improved, effectively helping enterprises reduce investment decision-making errors, improve resource allocation efficiency, enhance the market competitiveness of pipeline projects, and promote the healthy and sustainable development of pipeline projects.

[0094] The following is a summary of the above. Figure 3 The process of determining the scoring of multiple reference indicators for the pipeline project in S301 is explained. As a possible embodiment of this application, the above-mentioned S301 can also be implemented by steps 11 to 18.

[0095] Step 11: Electronic equipment determines the score of natural gas supply indicators.

[0096] Among them, natural gas supply indicators include the supply price of natural gas, the source of natural gas supply, the gas storage status of the supply source, and the connection status of the supply source with external pipelines.

[0097] The connection between the supply source and external pipelines can be used to characterize how convenient it is for users to connect to the supply source.

[0098] In one possible implementation, the score for natural gas supply indicators is determined based on scores for the supply price of natural gas, the source of natural gas supply, the storage capacity of the source of natural gas, and the connection between the source of natural gas and external pipelines.

[0099] For example, the scores for the natural gas supply price, the natural gas supply source, the gas storage conditions of the supply source, and the connection between the supply source and external pipelines are summed to obtain the natural gas supply index score.

[0100] In one possible implementation, a score for the natural gas supply price is determined based on the natural gas supply price of the pipeline project and a preset natural gas supply price.

[0101] The natural gas supply price for the pipeline project may or may not include pipeline transportation fees; this application embodiment does not impose such restrictions. The preset natural gas supply price may be a fixed value or it may be the benchmark city gate price of natural gas in the project area; this application embodiment does not impose such restrictions either.

[0102] Taking the preset natural gas supply price as the benchmark city gate price of natural gas in the project area as an example, the process of determining the score of natural gas supply price can be based on the ratio between the natural gas supply price and the benchmark city gate price of natural gas.

[0103] Specifically, if the ratio between the natural gas supply price and the natural gas benchmark city gate price is less than or equal to the first price ratio, the natural gas supply price is determined to be the first natural gas supply price score; if the ratio between the natural gas supply price and the natural gas benchmark city gate price is greater than the first price ratio and less than or equal to the second price ratio, the natural gas supply price is determined to be the second natural gas supply price score; and if the ratio between the natural gas supply price and the natural gas benchmark city gate price is greater than the second price ratio, the natural gas supply price is determined to be the third natural gas supply price score.

[0104] For example, the first price ratio could be 1.3; the second price ratio could be 1.6; the score for the first natural gas supply price could be 40 points; the score for the second natural gas supply price could be 25 points; and the score for the third natural gas supply price could be 10 points.

[0105] In one possible implementation, the process of determining the score of the natural gas supply source can be based on the reliability of the upstream supply source.

[0106] The reliability of upstream supply sources typically refers to the reliability, stability, and actual supply capacity of upstream suppliers within the natural gas supply chain. This reliability can be reflected in the proportion of domestically produced gas or gas supplied under long-term contracts. Domestically produced gas refers to natural gas extracted domestically. Long-term contracts refer to natural gas imported through long-term contracts; for example, long-term contracts could be for natural gas imported under contracts with a maturity of 10 years or more.

[0107] Specifically, if the proportion of domestically produced gas or long-term contract gas is greater than the first supply proportion, the score for determining the natural gas supply source is the score for the first natural gas supply source; if the proportion of domestically produced gas or long-term contract gas is greater than the second supply proportion but less than or equal to the first supply proportion, the score for determining the natural gas supply source is the score for the second natural gas supply source; if the proportion of domestically produced gas or long-term contract gas is less than or equal to the second supply proportion, the score for determining the natural gas supply source is the score for the third natural gas supply source.

[0108] For example, the first supply source could account for 80%, the second supply source could account for 60%, the first natural gas supply source could be scored 20 points, the second natural gas supply source could be scored 15 points, and the third natural gas supply source could be scored 10 points.

[0109] In one possible implementation, the process of determining the gas storage status of the supply source can be based on the ratio of the gas storage capacity of the supply source to a preset gas storage capacity of the supply source.

[0110] The preset gas storage capacity of the supply source can be a fixed value or the annual sales volume of natural gas; this application embodiment does not limit this.

[0111] Taking the ratio of the gas storage volume of the preset supply source to the annual sales volume of natural gas as an example, if the ratio of the gas storage volume of the supply source to the annual sales volume of natural gas is greater than or equal to the first gas storage ratio, the gas storage status of the supply source is determined as the first gas storage status score; if the ratio of the gas storage volume of the supply source to the annual sales volume of natural gas is greater than or equal to the second gas storage ratio and less than the first gas storage ratio, the gas storage status of the supply source is determined as the second gas storage status score; if the ratio of the gas storage volume of the supply source to the annual sales volume of natural gas is less than the second gas storage ratio, the gas storage status of the supply source is determined as the third gas storage status score.

[0112] For example, the first gas storage ratio can be 5%, the second gas storage ratio can be 2%, the gas storage status of the first supply source can be scored 20 points, the gas storage status of the second supply source can be scored 15 points, and the gas storage status of the third supply source can be scored 10 points.

[0113] In one possible implementation, the process of determining the score for the connection between the supply source and the external pipeline can be as follows: if there is a reserved opening between the supply source and the external pipeline, the score for the connection between the supply source and the external pipeline is determined as the first score for the connection between the supply source and the external pipeline; if there is no reserved opening between the supply source and the external pipeline, and a valve chamber exists at the supply source, the score for the connection between the supply source and the external pipeline is determined as the second score for the connection between the supply source and the external pipeline; and if there is no valve chamber at the supply source, the score for the connection between the supply source and the external pipeline is determined as the third score for the connection between the supply source and the external pipeline.

[0114] The score for the connection between the first supply source and the external pipeline can be 20 points, the score for the connection between the second supply source and the external pipeline can be 10 points, and the score for the connection between the third supply source and the external pipeline can be 0 points.

[0115] It should be noted that if there is a reserved opening between the supply source and the external pipeline, the user can directly connect to the gas through the reserved opening; if there is no reserved opening between the supply source and the external pipeline, but there is a valve chamber at the supply source, the user can connect to the gas through the valve chamber by modifying or expanding it; if there is no valve chamber at the supply source, the user needs to make an opening on the main natural gas pipeline to connect to the gas.

[0116] In this way, the scoring process for natural gas supply indicators can be clearly defined, and the scoring of natural gas supply indicators can be determined from multiple aspects, making the scoring of natural gas supply indicators more accurate and improving the feasibility of the scoring.

[0117] Step 12: Electronic equipment determines the score of natural gas usage indicators.

[0118] The natural gas usage indicators include residential gas usage indicators, public institution gas usage indicators, heating gas usage indicators, transportation gas usage indicators, industrial gas usage indicators, and direct supply indicators for large users.

[0119] Residential gas consumption indicators include resident population statistics and per capita gas consumption.

[0120] The public institution gas consumption index is used to indicate the natural gas usage of public institutions.

[0121] Heating gas consumption indicators include heating type, heating area statistics, and gas consumption per unit area. Heating type includes urban centralized heating and rural individual household heating.

[0122] The indicators for gas consumption in transportation include statistics on the number of vehicles and vessels using gas, the types of gas used by vehicles and vessels, and the gas consumption of vehicles and vessels.

[0123] Industrial gas consumption indicators include statistics on industrial users, industrial gas consumption volume, and types of industrial gas consumption.

[0124] Direct supply to large users refers to non-residential users such as power plants and chemical plants with a certain annual gas consumption. Natural gas suppliers can bypass city gas companies and supply natural gas directly to these large users. Indicators for direct supply to large users include the construction status of direct supply to large users, gas consumption by power plants, gas consumption by chemical plants, and total direct supply gas consumption.

[0125] In one possible implementation, the score for natural gas usage is determined based on scores for residential gas consumption, public institution gas consumption, heating gas consumption, transportation gas consumption, industrial gas consumption, and direct supply to large users.

[0126] For example, the scores of residential gas consumption indicators, public institution gas consumption indicators, heating gas consumption indicators, transportation gas consumption indicators, industrial gas consumption indicators, and direct supply large user indicators are summed to obtain the natural gas consumption indicator score.

[0127] In one possible implementation, the score for the resident gas consumption index can be determined by summing the scores for resident demographic statistics and resident per capita gas consumption.

[0128] Specifically, when the source of resident population data is a preset source and the resident gasification rate data is data from a first preset time period, the score for resident population statistics is determined as the first resident population statistics score; when the source of resident population data is a preset source and the resident gasification rate data is data from a second preset time period, the score for resident population statistics is determined as the second resident population statistics score; when the source of resident population data is not a preset source, or there is no resident population data, or the resident gasification rate data is data from a time period other than the second preset time period, or there is no resident gasification rate data, the score for resident population statistics is determined as the third resident population statistics score.

[0129] The preset sources can be the China Statistical Yearbook, population census data, urban master planning documents, etc. The data for the first preset time period can be data from within one year, and the data for the second preset time period can be data from within three years. The score for the first resident population statistics can be 5 points, the score for the second resident population statistics can be 3 points, and the score for the third resident population statistics can be 0 points.

[0130] If the deviation between the average residential gas consumption and the preset average residential gas consumption is less than or equal to the first residential gas consumption deviation, the score for the average residential gas consumption is determined as the first average residential gas consumption score; if the deviation between the average residential gas consumption and the preset average residential gas consumption is less than or equal to the second residential gas consumption deviation, and greater than the first residential gas consumption deviation, the score for the average residential gas consumption is determined as the second average residential gas consumption score; if the deviation between the average residential gas consumption and the preset average residential gas consumption is greater than the second average residential gas consumption deviation, the score for the average residential gas consumption is determined as the third average residential gas consumption score.

[0131] Among them, the deviation between the per capita gas consumption of residents and the preset per capita gas consumption of residents can be the absolute value of the deviation between the per capita gas consumption of residents and the preset per capita gas consumption of residents.

[0132] For example, the gas consumption deviation of the first resident could be 10%, and the gas consumption deviation of the second resident could be 20%. The average gas consumption per capita of the first resident could be scored 5 points, the average gas consumption per capita of the second resident could be scored 3 points, and the average gas consumption per capita of the third resident could be scored 0 points.

[0133] It should be noted that per capita residential gas consumption includes both residential gas consumption for daily use and gas consumption for individual heating in urban households. Data on per capita residential gas consumption can be obtained from data released by urban planning departments, gas companies, and natural gas industry associations.

[0134] In one possible implementation, the score for the public institution gas consumption index can be determined based on the deviation between the public institution's gas consumption and the preset public institution gas consumption.

[0135] Specifically, if the deviation between public gas consumption and the preset public gas consumption is less than or equal to the first public gas consumption deviation, the score for the public gas consumption index is determined as the score for the first public gas consumption index; if the deviation between public gas consumption and the preset public gas consumption is less than or equal to the second public gas consumption deviation, but greater than the first public gas consumption deviation, the score for the public gas consumption index is determined as the score for the second public gas consumption index; if the deviation between public gas consumption and the preset public gas consumption is greater than the second public gas consumption deviation, the score for the public gas consumption index is determined as the score for the third public gas consumption index.

[0136] The gas consumption of public institutions can refer to the total amount of gas consumed by public institutions or the ratio of the amount of gas consumed by public institutions to the amount of gas consumed by residents. This application does not limit this.

[0137] The deviation between the gas consumption of public institutions and the preset gas consumption of public institutions can be the absolute value of the deviation between the gas consumption of public institutions and the preset gas consumption of public institutions.

[0138] For example, the gas consumption deviation of the first public institution can be 10%, and the gas consumption deviation of the second public institution can be 20%. The gas consumption index of the first public institution can be scored 5 points, the gas consumption index of the second public institution can be scored 3 points, and the gas consumption index of the third public institution can be scored 0 points.

[0139] It should be noted that the gas consumption of public institutions can be the gas consumption of public institutions in the most recent year, which can be obtained through published reference data of public institutions, regional industrial fit, and other data.

[0140] In one possible implementation, the scores for heating type, heating area statistics, and gas consumption per unit area can be summed to determine the gas consumption index score.

[0141] Specifically, if the heating type data includes both urban centralized heating data and rural individual household heating data, the score for determining the heating type is the score for the first heating type; otherwise, the score for determining the heating type is the score for the second heating type.

[0142] For example, the score for the first heating type is 2 points, and the score for the second heating type is 0 points.

[0143] If the heating area statistics are for the first preset heating time, the score for the heating area statistics is determined as the score for the first heating area statistics; if the heating area statistics are for the second preset heating time, but not for the first preset heating time, the score for the heating area statistics is determined as the score for the second heating area statistics; if the heating area statistics are for a time other than the second preset heating time, the score for the heating area statistics is determined as the score for the third heating area statistics.

[0144] For example, the data for the first preset heating period is from within one year, and the data for the second preset heating period is from within three years. The score for the first heating area statistics is 4 points, the score for the second heating area statistics is 2 points, and the score for the third heating area statistics is 0 points.

[0145] It should be noted that heating area statistics can be obtained from statistical yearbooks, survey data from the Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau, and data released by heating companies.

[0146] If the deviation between the gas consumption per unit area for heating and the preset gas consumption per unit area is less than or equal to the first gas consumption deviation, the gas consumption per unit area is determined as the first unit area gas consumption score; if the deviation between the gas consumption per unit area for heating and the preset gas consumption per unit area is less than or equal to the second gas consumption deviation, and greater than the first gas consumption deviation, the gas consumption per unit area is determined as the second unit area gas consumption score; if the deviation between the gas consumption per unit area for heating and the preset gas consumption per unit area is greater than the second gas consumption deviation, the gas consumption per unit area is determined as the third unit area gas consumption score.

[0147] Here, heating gas consumption per unit area is the ratio between the total heating gas consumption and the heating area. The deviation between heating gas consumption per unit area and the preset heating gas consumption per unit area can be the absolute value of the deviation between heating gas consumption per unit area and the preset heating gas consumption per unit area.

[0148] For example, the first heating gas consumption deviation is 10%, and the second heating gas consumption deviation is 20%. The score for the first unit area heating gas consumption is 4 points, the score for the second unit area heating gas consumption is 2 points, and the score for the third unit area heating gas consumption is 0 points.

[0149] It should be noted that the gas consumption per unit area for heating can be the gas consumption per unit area for heating in the most recent year, which can be obtained from data such as the number of heating days and gas consumption per unit area for heating published on the government service websites of various regions.

[0150] In one possible implementation, the scores for the statistics of gasified vehicle and vessel volume, the scores for the types of gas used by vehicles and vessels, and the scores for the gas consumption of vehicles and vessels can be summed to obtain the score for the traffic gas consumption index.

[0151] If the gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics are based on data from the first preset traffic time, the score for the gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics is determined as the first gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics score; if the gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics are based on data from the second preset traffic time, but not from the first preset traffic time, the score for the gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics is determined as the second gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics score; if the gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics are based on data from a time other than the second preset traffic time, the score for the gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics is determined as the third gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics score.

[0152] For example, the data for the first preset traffic time is from within one year, and the data for the second preset traffic time is from within three years. The score for the first gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics is 4 points, the score for the second gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics is 2 points, and the score for the third gasified vehicle and vessel volume statistics is 0 points.

[0153] It should be noted that the statistics on the number of gasified vehicles and vessels can be obtained from published statistical yearbooks, survey data from the transportation bureau, data released by the maritime safety administration, and data released by industry research associations.

[0154] When the gas type for vehicles and vessels is the preset gas type, the score for determining the gas type is the score for the first gas type; when the gas type for vehicles and vessels is not the preset gas type, the score for determining the gas type is the score for the second gas type.

[0155] For example, the preset types of gas used by vehicles and vessels are new energy vehicles and vessels, upgraded and renovated old vehicles and vessels, and liquefied natural gas powered ships. The score for the first type of gas used by vehicles and vessels is 2 points, and the score for the second type of gas used by vehicles and vessels is 0 points.

[0156] If the deviation between the vehicle / vehicle gas consumption and the preset vehicle / vehicle gas consumption is less than or equal to the first vehicle / vehicle gas consumption deviation, the vehicle / vehicle gas consumption status is determined as the first vehicle / vehicle gas consumption status score; if the deviation between the vehicle / vehicle gas consumption and the preset vehicle / vehicle gas consumption is less than or equal to the second vehicle / vehicle gas consumption deviation, and greater than the first vehicle / vehicle gas consumption deviation, the vehicle / vehicle gas consumption status is determined as the second vehicle / vehicle gas consumption status score; if the deviation between the vehicle / vehicle gas consumption and the preset vehicle / vehicle gas consumption is greater than the second vehicle / vehicle gas consumption deviation, the vehicle / vehicle gas consumption status is determined as the third vehicle / vehicle gas consumption status score.

[0157] The deviation between the vehicle and vessel gas consumption and the preset vehicle and vessel gas consumption can be the absolute value of the deviation between the vehicle and vessel gas consumption and the preset vehicle and vessel gas consumption.

[0158] For example, the first vehicle / vehicle has a gas consumption deviation of 10%, and the second vehicle / vehicle has a gas consumption deviation of 20%. The gas consumption of the first vehicle / vehicle is scored 4 points, the gas consumption of the second vehicle / vehicle is scored 2 points, and the gas consumption of the third vehicle / vehicle is scored 0 points.

[0159] In one possible implementation, the scores for industrial user statistics, industrial gas consumption, and industrial gas type can be summed to obtain the score for industrial gas consumption indicators.

[0160] When the industrial user statistics data form a first industrial user statistics set, the score for the industrial user statistics data is determined to be the score for the first industrial user statistics data; when the industrial user statistics data form a second industrial user statistics set, the score for the industrial user statistics data is determined to be the score for the second industrial user statistics data; when the industrial user statistics data form a third industrial user statistics set, the score for the industrial user statistics data is determined to be the score for the third industrial user statistics data.

[0161] For example, the first industrial user statistical set includes all large-scale industrial users, including those with energy consumption and product output. The second industrial user statistical set includes some large-scale industrial users. The third industrial user statistical set includes non-large-scale industrial users. The score for the first industrial user statistics is 10 points. The score for the second industrial user statistics is 5 points. The score for the third industrial user statistics is 0 points.

[0162] It should be noted that industrial user statistics can be obtained from data released by the Economic and Information Bureau, data released by the National Development and Reform Commission, or data from on-site surveys.

[0163] If the proportion of industrial gas consumption is greater than or equal to the proportion of the first industrial gas consumption, the score for industrial gas consumption is determined as the score for the first industrial gas consumption. If the proportion of industrial gas consumption is greater than or equal to the proportion of the second industrial gas consumption, but less than the proportion of the first industrial gas consumption, the score for industrial gas consumption is determined as the score for the second industrial gas consumption. If the proportion of industrial gas consumption is greater than or equal to the proportion of the third industrial gas consumption, but less than the proportion of the second industrial gas consumption, the score for industrial gas consumption is determined as the score for the third industrial gas consumption. If the proportion of industrial gas consumption is less than the proportion of the third industrial gas consumption, the score for industrial gas consumption is determined as the score for the fourth industrial gas consumption.

[0164] The industrial gas consumption ratio is the proportion of gas consumption by the target industrial enterprises to the total gas consumption of all industrial enterprises. Target industrial enterprises can be naturally high-value-added enterprises, such as glass and ceramic enterprises; or they can be cost-insensitive enterprises, such as food and beverage enterprises, pharmaceutical enterprises, clothing and textile enterprises, machinery enterprises, electronics enterprises, tobacco enterprises, and paper enterprises.

[0165] For example, the gas consumption of the first industry accounts for 50%, the gas consumption of the second industry accounts for 30%, and the gas consumption of the third industry accounts for 10%. The gas consumption of the first industry is scored 15 points, the gas consumption of the second industry is scored 12 points, the gas consumption of the third industry is scored 10 points, and the gas consumption of the fourth industry is scored 6 points.

[0166] When the industrial gas type is the first type, the score for determining the industrial gas type is the score for the first type; when the industrial gas type is the second type, the score for determining the industrial gas type is the score for the second type; and when the industrial gas type is the third type, the score for determining the industrial gas type is the score for the third type.

[0167] For example, the first type of industrial gas use refers to enterprises that have already implemented the use of natural gas. The second type of industrial gas use refers to enterprises that plan to use natural gas. The third type of industrial gas use refers to enterprises that have not used natural gas. The score for the first type of industrial gas use is 10 points, the score for the second type of industrial gas use is 5 points, and the score for the third type of industrial gas use is 0 points.

[0168] In one possible implementation, the scores for the construction status of direct-supply large users, the gas consumption status of power plants, the gas consumption status of chemical plants, and the total gas consumption status of direct supply can be summed to obtain the score for the direct-supply large user indicator.

[0169] If the proportion of direct-supply large user construction is greater than or equal to the proportion of the first direct-supply large user construction, the score for the direct-supply large user construction is determined as the score for the first direct-supply large user construction; if the proportion of direct-supply large user construction is greater than or equal to the proportion of the second direct-supply large user construction, but less than the proportion of the first direct-supply large user construction, the score for the direct-supply large user construction is determined as the score for the second direct-supply large user construction; if the proportion of direct-supply large user construction is less than the proportion of the second direct-supply large user construction, the score for the direct-supply large user construction is determined as the score for the third direct-supply large user construction.

[0170] The construction ratio of direct-supply large users can refer to the proportion of direct-supply large users that have obtained project approval out of all direct-supply large users, or it can refer to the proportion of direct-supply large users that are under construction out of all direct-supply large users.

[0171] For example, the first direct-supply large user base accounts for 50% of the total user base. The second direct-supply large user base accounts for 20%. The score for the first direct-supply large user base is 10 points. The score for the second direct-supply large user base is 5 points. The score for the third direct-supply large user base is 0 points.

[0172] It should be noted that the data for direct supply to large users can be obtained through data released by the approval department.

[0173] If the deviation between the power plant's gas consumption and the preset power plant gas consumption is less than or equal to the first power plant gas consumption deviation, the power plant gas consumption status is determined as the first power plant gas consumption status score; if the deviation between the power plant's gas consumption and the preset power plant gas consumption is less than or equal to the second power plant gas consumption deviation, but greater than the first power plant gas consumption deviation, the power plant gas consumption status is determined as the second power plant gas consumption status score; if the deviation between the power plant's gas consumption and the preset power plant gas consumption is greater than the second power plant gas consumption deviation, the power plant gas consumption status is determined as the third power plant gas consumption status score.

[0174] The deviation between the power plant's gas consumption and the preset power plant gas consumption can be the absolute value of the deviation. The power plant's gas consumption is the product of the installed capacity, annual utilization hours, and the preset power plant gas consumption index.

[0175] For example, the gas consumption deviation of the first power plant is 10%. The gas consumption deviation of the second power plant is 20%. The gas consumption score of the first power plant is 5 points. The gas consumption score of the second power plant is 3 points. The gas consumption score of the third power plant is 0 points.

[0176] If the deviation between the chemical gas consumption and the preset chemical gas consumption is less than or equal to the first chemical gas consumption deviation, the chemical gas consumption status is determined as the first chemical gas consumption status score; if the deviation between the chemical gas consumption and the preset chemical gas consumption is less than or equal to the second chemical gas consumption deviation, and greater than the first chemical gas consumption deviation, the chemical gas consumption status is determined as the second chemical gas consumption status score; if the deviation between the chemical gas consumption and the preset chemical gas consumption is greater than the second chemical gas consumption deviation, the chemical gas consumption status is determined as the third chemical gas consumption status score.

[0177] The deviation between the chemical gas consumption and the preset chemical gas consumption can be the absolute value of the deviation. Chemical gas consumption is the product of chemical product output and unit gas consumption.

[0178] For example, the deviation in gas consumption for the first chemical plant is 10%. The deviation in gas consumption for the second chemical plant is 20%. The score for gas consumption for the first chemical plant is 5 points. The score for gas consumption for the second chemical plant is 3 points. The score for gas consumption for the third chemical plant is 0 points.

[0179] If the total direct gas consumption is greater than or equal to the first direct gas consumption, the score for the total direct gas consumption is determined as the score for the first direct gas consumption. If the total direct gas consumption is greater than or equal to the second direct gas consumption, but less than the first direct gas consumption, the score for the total direct gas consumption is determined as the score for the second direct gas consumption. If the total direct gas consumption is greater than or equal to the third direct gas consumption, but less than the second direct gas consumption, the score for the total direct gas consumption is determined as the score for the third direct gas consumption. If the total direct gas consumption is less than the third direct gas consumption, the score for the total direct gas consumption is determined as the score for the fourth direct gas consumption.

[0180] For example, the first direct-supply gas consumption is 500 million cubic meters. The second direct-supply gas consumption is 200 million cubic meters. The third direct-supply gas consumption is 20 million cubic meters. The score for the first direct-supply total gas consumption is 5 points. The score for the second direct-supply total gas consumption is 4 points. The score for the third direct-supply total gas consumption is 3 points. The score for the fourth direct-supply total gas consumption is 2 points.

[0181] This allows for a clear scoring of natural gas usage indicators, providing a basis for determining these scores and improving the accuracy of pipeline project assessments.

[0182] Step 13: The electronic equipment determines the scoring of the project's competitive indicators.

[0183] Among them, the competitive indicators for the project include the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0184] In one possible implementation, the project's competitive indicators are scored based on the scores of the pipeline project's competitors' total natural gas volume, the pipeline quantity of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0185] For example, the scores of the pipeline project's competitors' total natural gas volume, pipeline quantity, supply price, and supply source are summed to obtain the project's competitive index score.

[0186] If a competitor's share of total natural gas volume is less than or equal to the share of the first total natural gas volume, the score for the competitor's total natural gas volume is determined as the score for the first competitor's total natural gas volume. If a competitor's share of total natural gas volume is less than or equal to the share of the second total natural gas volume, but greater than the share of the first total natural gas volume, the score for the competitor's total natural gas volume is determined as the score for the second competitor's total natural gas volume. If a competitor's share of total natural gas volume is greater than the share of the second total natural gas volume, the score for the competitor's total natural gas volume is determined as the score for the third competitor's total natural gas volume.

[0187] The percentage of competitors' total natural gas volume can be the proportion of competitors' total natural gas volume to the total demand for natural gas.

[0188] For example, the first competitor accounts for 50% of the total natural gas volume, and the second competitor accounts for 80%. The first competitor's total natural gas volume score is 40 points. The second competitor's total natural gas volume score is 25 points. The third competitor's total natural gas volume score is 10 points.

[0189] If the number of channels of a competitor is the first number of channels, the score for determining the number of channels of a competitor is the score for the number of channels of the first competitor; if the number of channels of a competitor is the second number of channels, the score for determining the number of channels of a competitor is the score for the number of channels of the second competitor; if the number of channels of a competitor is greater than or equal to the number of channels of the third number, the score for determining the number of channels of a competitor is the score for the number of channels of the third competitor.

[0190] For example, the first competitor has 0 pipelines. The second competitor has 1 pipeline. The third competitor has 2 pipelines. The first competitor's pipeline score is 20 points. The second competitor's pipeline score is 10 points. The third competitor's pipeline score is 5 points.

[0191] If the supply price of the pipeline project is less than the preset supply price, the supply price of the pipeline project is determined as the supply price score of the first pipeline project; if the supply price of the pipeline project is equal to the preset supply price, the supply price of the pipeline project is determined as the supply price score of the second pipeline project; if the supply price of the pipeline project is greater than the preset supply price, the supply price of the pipeline project is determined as the supply price score of the third pipeline project.

[0192] The preset project supply price can be the average supply price of other pipeline projects in the region where the pipeline project is located, excluding this project; or it can be the lowest supply price of other pipeline projects in the region where the pipeline project is located, excluding this project.

[0193] For example, the supply price of the first pipeline project received a score of 20. The supply price of the second pipeline project received a score of 10. The supply price of the third pipeline project received a score of 5.

[0194] If a competitor's supply source share is greater than or equal to that of the first competitor, the competitor's supply source score is determined as the score of the first competitor's supply source; if a competitor's supply source share is greater than or equal to that of the second competitor, but less than that of the first competitor, the competitor's supply source score is determined as the score of the second competitor's supply source; if a competitor's supply source share is less than that of the second competitor, the competitor's supply source score is determined as the score of the third competitor's supply source.

[0195] Among them, the proportion of a competitor's supply source can be the proportion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the total natural gas; or, the proportion of a competitor's supply source can be the proportion of gas consumption by dual-source industrial users in the total industrial gas consumption.

[0196] For example, the first competitor's supply share is 30%. The second competitor's supply share is 10%. The first competitor's supply source score is 20 points. The second competitor's supply source score is 10 points. The third competitor's supply source score is 0 points.

[0197] It should be noted that the relevant data for project competitive indicators can be obtained through market research data and data released by industry associations.

[0198] This allows for a clear definition of the scoring criteria for project competitiveness indicators, providing a basis for determining these scores and improving the accuracy of pipeline project evaluation.

[0199] Step 14: Electronic devices determine the score of regional consumption indicators.

[0200] The regional consumption indicators include per capita income, energy self-sufficiency, residential gas distribution, and industrial gas distribution. The energy self-sufficiency indicator indicates the energy production and consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the residential gas distribution indicator indicates the natural gas delivery service fees charged to residents in the region where the pipeline project is located; and the industrial gas distribution indicator indicates the natural gas delivery service fees charged to industrial users in the region where the pipeline project is located.

[0201] In one possible implementation, the regional consumption index score is determined based on scores for per capita income, energy self-sufficiency, residential gas distribution, and industrial gas distribution.

[0202] For example, the scores of per capita income, energy self-sufficiency, residential gas distribution, and industrial gas distribution are summed to obtain the score of regional consumption.

[0203] If per capita disposable income is greater than or equal to the first per capita income, the score of the per capita income indicator is determined as the score of the first per capita income indicator; if per capita disposable income is greater than or equal to the second per capita income but less than the first per capita income, the score of the per capita income indicator is determined as the score of the second per capita income indicator; if per capita disposable income is less than the second per capita income, the score of the per capita income indicator is determined as the score of the third per capita income indicator.

[0204] For example, the first per capita income is 40,000 yuan. The second per capita income is 20,000 yuan. The first per capita income indicator scores 25 points. The second per capita income indicator scores 20 points. The third per capita income indicator scores 15 points.

[0205] Understandably, if per capita disposable income is greater than or equal to the first per capita income, it indicates that the region is economically developed. If per capita disposable income is greater than or equal to the second per capita income but less than the first, it indicates that the region's economic development is average. If per capita disposable income is less than the second per capita income, it indicates that the region is economically underdeveloped.

[0206] When energy production is less than consumption, the energy self-sufficiency indicator score is determined as the first energy self-sufficiency indicator score; when energy production equals consumption, the energy self-sufficiency indicator score is determined as the second energy self-sufficiency indicator score; and when energy production exceeds consumption, the energy self-sufficiency indicator score is determined as the third energy self-sufficiency indicator score.

[0207] For example, the score for the first energy self-sufficiency indicator is 25 points. The score for the second energy self-sufficiency indicator is 20 points. The score for the third energy self-sufficiency indicator is 15 points.

[0208] Understandably, if energy production is less than consumption, it indicates insufficient productivity in the region, meaning high prices for various alternative energy sources, and investing in this project could potentially generate high returns. If energy production equals consumption, it indicates a balance between production and demand in the region, meaning moderate prices for various alternative energy sources, and investing in this project might yield moderate returns. If energy production exceeds consumption, it indicates an oversupply in the region, low prices for various alternative energy sources, and investing in this project might yield low returns.

[0209] If the residential gas distribution fee is less than or equal to the first residential gas distribution fee, the score of the residential gas distribution index is determined as the score of the first residential gas distribution index; if the residential gas distribution fee is less than or equal to the second residential gas distribution fee but greater than the first residential gas distribution fee, the score of the residential gas distribution index is determined as the score of the second residential gas distribution index; if the residential gas distribution fee is greater than the second residential gas distribution fee, the score of the residential gas distribution index is determined as the score of the third residential gas distribution index.

[0210] Among them, the residential gas distribution fee is the fee charged to residents for natural gas delivery services.

[0211] For example, the gas distribution fee for the first resident is 0.5 yuan / cubic meter. The gas distribution fee for the second resident is 1.0 yuan / cubic meter. The gas distribution index score for the first resident is 25 points. The gas distribution index score for the second resident is 20 points. The gas distribution index score for the third resident is 15 points.

[0212] If the industrial gas distribution fee is less than or equal to the first industrial gas distribution fee, the score of the industrial gas distribution index is determined as the score of the first industrial gas distribution index; if the industrial gas distribution fee is less than or equal to the second industrial gas distribution fee but greater than the first industrial gas distribution fee, the score of the industrial gas distribution index is determined as the score of the second industrial gas distribution index; if the industrial gas distribution fee is greater than the second industrial gas distribution fee, the score of the industrial gas distribution index is determined as the score of the third industrial gas distribution index.

[0213] The industrial gas distribution fee is a fee charged to industrial users for natural gas delivery services.

[0214] For example, the gas distribution fee for the first industry is 1.0 yuan / cubic meter. The gas distribution fee for the second industry is 1.4 yuan / cubic meter. The score for the gas distribution index for the first industry is 25 points. The score for the gas distribution index for the second industry is 20 points. The score for the gas distribution index for the third industry is 15 points.

[0215] This allows for a clear scoring of regional consumption indicators, providing a basis for determining these scores and improving the accuracy of pipeline project assessments.

[0216] Step 15: Electronic equipment determines the scoring of project investment indicators.

[0217] The project investment indicators include the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the pipeline project turnover, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project. The pipeline project turnover indicates the total amount of natural gas transported through the pipeline, while the average transportation distance indicates the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0218] In one possible implementation, the project investment indicators are scored based on the scores of the pipeline project's cost per kilometer, the pipeline project's turnover rate, and the pipeline project's average transport distance.

[0219] For example, the scores for the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover rate of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project are summed to obtain the project investment index score.

[0220] If the deviation between the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project and the preset cost per kilometer is less than or equal to the first cost per kilometer deviation, the cost per kilometer score is determined as the first cost per kilometer score; if the deviation between the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project and the preset cost per kilometer is less than or equal to the second cost per kilometer deviation, and greater than the first cost per kilometer deviation, the cost per kilometer score is determined as the second cost per kilometer score; if the deviation between the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project and the preset cost per kilometer is greater than the second cost per kilometer deviation, the cost per kilometer score is determined as the third cost per kilometer score.

[0221] The cost per kilometer of a pipeline project is equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the total investment of the pipeline project by the total length of the pipeline project. The preset cost per kilometer can be a fixed value or the average cost per kilometer of other similar projects in the same region. The deviation between the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project and the preset cost per kilometer can be the absolute value of the deviation.

[0222] For example, the cost deviation for the first unit kilometer is 10%. The cost deviation for the second unit kilometer is 20%. The cost score for the first unit kilometer is 20 points. The cost score for the second unit kilometer is 10 points. The cost score for the third unit kilometer is 0 points.

[0223] If the proportion of pipeline project turnover to the preset project turnover is greater than or equal to the proportion of the first project turnover, the project turnover score is determined as the first project turnover score; if the proportion of pipeline project turnover to the preset project turnover is greater than or equal to the proportion of the second project turnover, but less than the proportion of the first project turnover, the project turnover score is determined as the second project turnover score; if the proportion of pipeline project turnover to the preset project turnover is less than the proportion of the second project turnover, the project turnover score is determined as the third project turnover score.

[0224] The project turnover rate for pipeline projects is the product of the pipeline length and the gas transmission volume. The preset project turnover rate can be a fixed value set in advance, or it can be the average of the project turnover rates of other pipeline projects in the same region as the pipeline project.

[0225] For example, the turnover rate of the first project is 100%. The turnover rate of the second project is 90%. The turnover rate of the first project is rated 35 points. The turnover rate of the second project is rated 25 points. The turnover rate of the third project is rated 10 points.

[0226] If the average transport distance of the pipeline project is greater than or equal to the preset average transport distance, the average transport distance score is determined as the first average transport distance score; if the average transport distance of the pipeline project is less than the preset average transport distance, the average transport distance score is determined as the second average transport distance score.

[0227] The average transport distance for a pipeline project is calculated by dividing the project turnover by the pipeline length. The preset average transport distance can be a fixed value or the average of the average transport distances of other pipeline projects in the same region.

[0228] For example, the first average transport distance received a score of 45. The second average transport distance received a score of 0.

[0229] This allows for a clear scoring of project investment indicators, providing a basis for determining these indicators and improving the accuracy of pipeline project evaluation.

[0230] Step 16: The electronic device determines the scoring of the intended cooperation indicators.

[0231] Among them, the indicators of intended cooperation include those with upstream units, those with industrial users, those with large direct supply users, and those with downstream users.

[0232] In one possible implementation, the score for the intended cooperation indicator is determined based on the scores for the intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, industrial users, large direct supply users, and downstream users.

[0233] For example, the scores of the intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, industrial users, large direct supply users, and downstream users are summed to obtain the cooperation indicator score.

[0234] If the intended gas transmission volume with upstream units accounts for a proportion of the total upstream gas transmission volume that is greater than or equal to the first upstream gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with upstream units is determined as the score for the first intended cooperation indicator with upstream units. If the intended gas transmission volume with upstream units accounts for a proportion of the total upstream gas transmission volume that is greater than or equal to the second upstream gas transmission proportion, but less than the first upstream gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with upstream units is determined as the score for the second intended cooperation indicator with upstream units. If the intended gas transmission volume with upstream units accounts for a proportion of the total upstream gas transmission volume that is less than the second upstream gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with upstream units is determined as the score for the third intended cooperation indicator with upstream units.

[0235] For example, the first upstream gas transmission accounts for 70%. The second upstream gas transmission accounts for 60%. The score for the first upstream unit's intended cooperation indicator is 40 points. The score for the second upstream unit's intended cooperation indicator is 25 points. The score for the third upstream unit's intended cooperation indicator is 10 points.

[0236] If the intended gas transmission volume with industrial users accounts for a proportion greater than or equal to the first industrial gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with industrial users is determined as the first score for the intended cooperation indicator with industrial users. If the intended gas transmission volume with industrial users accounts for a proportion greater than or equal to the second industrial gas transmission proportion, but less than the first industrial gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with industrial users is determined as the second score for the intended cooperation indicator with industrial users. If the intended gas transmission volume with industrial users accounts for a proportion less than the second industrial gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with industrial users is determined as the third score for the intended cooperation indicator with industrial users.

[0237] For example, the first industrial gas transmission accounts for 50%, and the second industrial gas transmission accounts for 20%. The score for the first industrial user's intended cooperation indicator is 10 points. The score for the second industrial user's intended cooperation indicator is 5 points. The score for the third industrial user's intended cooperation indicator is 0 points.

[0238] If the proportion of gas transmission volume intended for cooperation with a major direct-supply user is greater than or equal to the proportion of gas transmission to the first major direct-supply user, then the score for the intention to cooperate with the major direct-supply user is determined as the score for the first intention to cooperate with the major direct-supply user. If the proportion of gas transmission volume intended for cooperation with a major direct-supply user is greater than or equal to the proportion of gas transmission to the second major direct-supply user, but less than the proportion of gas transmission to the first major direct-supply user, then the score for the intention to cooperate with the major direct-supply user is determined as the score for the second intention to cooperate with the major direct-supply user. If the proportion of gas transmission volume intended for cooperation with a major direct-supply user is less than the proportion of gas transmission to the second major direct-supply user, then the score for the intention to cooperate with the major direct-supply user is determined as the score for the third intention to cooperate with the major direct-supply user.

[0239] For example, the first direct-supply large user accounts for 50% of gas supply. The second direct-supply large user accounts for 20%. The score for the first direct-supply large user's intention to cooperate is 10 points. The score for the second direct-supply large user's intention to cooperate is 5 points. The score for the third direct-supply large user's intention to cooperate is 0 points.

[0240] If the intended gas transmission volume with downstream users accounts for a proportion greater than or equal to the first downstream gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with downstream users is determined as the score for the first intended cooperation indicator with downstream users. If the intended gas transmission volume with downstream users accounts for a proportion greater than or equal to the second downstream gas transmission proportion, but less than the first downstream gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with downstream users is determined as the score for the second intended cooperation indicator with downstream users. If the intended gas transmission volume with downstream users accounts for a proportion less than the second downstream gas transmission proportion, the score for the intended cooperation indicator with downstream users is determined as the score for the third intended cooperation indicator with downstream users.

[0241] For example, the first downstream gas transmission accounts for 70%. The second downstream gas transmission accounts for 60%. The score for the first downstream user's intention to cooperate is 10 points. The score for the second downstream user's intention to cooperate is 8 points. The score for the third downstream user's intention to cooperate is 6 points.

[0242] In this way, the scoring of the intended cooperation indicators can be clearly defined, providing a basis for judgment and improving the accuracy of pipeline project evaluation.

[0243] Step 17: The electronic device determines the score of the positive indicator.

[0244] Understandably, positive indicators are used to represent the advantages of a pipeline project. The higher the score of a positive indicator, the more advantageous the pipeline project is.

[0245] The scores for positive indicators can be preset values ​​or determined based on project reports. For example, during the feasibility assessment of a pipeline project, a corresponding project report is generated to evaluate the project. Machine learning methods are used to determine whether the report evaluates the project from multiple perspectives, whether the report content is complete, or whether the report format is correct, thereby determining the score for the positive indicator.

[0246] For example, a positive indicator score of 30 or less.

[0247] Step 18: The electronic device determines the score of the negative indicator.

[0248] Understandably, negative indicators are used to represent the weaknesses of a pipeline project. The higher the score of a negative indicator, the more unfavorable the pipeline project is.

[0249] Negative indicators can be scored using pre-set values ​​or based on project reports. For example, during the feasibility assessment of a pipeline project, a corresponding project report is generated to evaluate the project. Machine learning methods are used to determine whether the data in the report is accurate, whether the report content is complete, or whether the report format is correct, thereby determining the score for positive indicators.

[0250] Furthermore, before determining the scores for the aforementioned reference indicators, the data can be preprocessed before calculating the scores. For example, software such as Excel and SPSS can be used to organize, clean, and analyze the collected data, supplementing and estimating missing data. Additionally, multi-dimensional summary analysis can be performed on this data, and the mean and standard deviation can be calculated as reference factors for pipeline project evaluation. When determining the scores for each indicator, functions such as IF and VLOOKUP can be used for automatic scoring. Taking the determination of the natural gas supply price score as an example, the IF function can be used to set a condition: if the ratio between the natural gas supply price and the natural gas benchmark city station price is less than or equal to a first price ratio, the score for the natural gas supply price is output as the score for the first natural gas supply price.

[0251] Figure 4 The diagram illustrates several reference indicators provided for embodiments of this application. For example... Figure 4 As shown, multiple reference indicators include natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, intended cooperation indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators.

[0252] (1) Natural gas supply indicators include the supply price of natural gas, the source of natural gas supply, the gas storage status of the source of supply, and the connection status of the source of supply with external pipelines.

[0253] (2) Natural gas usage indicators include residential gas usage indicators, public institution gas usage indicators, heating gas usage indicators, transportation gas usage indicators, industrial gas usage indicators, and direct supply indicators for large users.

[0254] The indicators for residential gas consumption include resident population statistics and per capita gas consumption. Heating gas consumption includes heating type, heating area statistics, and gas consumption per unit area. Transportation gas consumption includes statistics on the number of gasified vehicles and vessels, types of gas used by vehicles and vessels, and gas consumption by vehicles and vessels. Industrial gas consumption includes statistics on industrial users, industrial gas consumption, and types of industrial gas. Indicators for direct supply to large users include the construction status of direct supply to large users, gas consumption by power plants, gas consumption by chemical plants, and total direct supply gas consumption.

[0255] (3) Project competitive indicators include the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0256] (4) Regional consumption indicators include per capita income, energy self-sufficiency, residential gas distribution, and industrial gas distribution.

[0257] (5) Project investment indicators include the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the turnover of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0258] (6) Intended cooperation indicators include intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, intended cooperation indicators with industrial users, intended cooperation indicators with large direct supply users, and intended cooperation indicators with downstream users.

[0259] The following is a summary of the above. Figure 3 The process of determining the comprehensive score of the pipeline project in S302 is explained. As a possible embodiment of this application, the above-mentioned S302 can also be implemented by the following steps 21 to 22.

[0260] Step 21: The electronic device determines the weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators.

[0261] In one possible implementation, the preset weight is a pre-set fixed value.

[0262] For example, the weight of the natural gas supply indicator is 15%. The weight of the natural gas consumption indicator is 35%. The weight of the project competition indicator is 20%. The weight of the regional consumption indicator is 10%. The weight of the project investment indicator is 20%. The weight of the intended cooperation indicator is 10%. The weight of the positive indicator is 10%. The weight of the negative indicator is 5%.

[0263] In another possible implementation, the weights of multiple reference indicators are determined based on principal component analysis.

[0264] For example, a reference indicator matrix is ​​constructed by acquiring data from multiple reference indicators. This matrix is ​​then standardized to obtain a standardized reference matrix. Principal component analysis is used to obtain the eigenvalues ​​of the multiple reference indicators. Based on the eigenvalues ​​and variance contribution rates of the multiple reference indicators, their weights are calculated and used as the corresponding weights for each reference indicator.

[0265] In this way, there is no need to manually determine the weights of multiple reference indicators, avoiding the impact of subjective judgment on pipeline project evaluation. Furthermore, while preserving data characteristics, it can reduce dimensionality and eliminate redundancy, avoiding repeated calculations of the data.

[0266] Step 22: The electronic equipment performs a weighted summation of the scores of multiple reference indicators and the corresponding weights of the multiple reference indicators to obtain the comprehensive score of the pipeline project.

[0267] For example, the overall score of a pipeline project = Σ(score of each reference indicator * weight of the reference indicator).

[0268] In this way, the calculation method of the comprehensive score of pipeline projects can be clarified, and the comprehensive score of pipeline projects can be calculated according to the weights corresponding to different reference indicators. The comprehensive score of pipeline projects can be flexibly calculated according to the different importance of multiple reference indicators, thereby improving the accuracy of pipeline project evaluation.

[0269] The following is a summary of the above. Figure 3 The process of determining the feasibility of a pipeline project as shown in S303 will be explained. Taking feasibility levels including Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, and Level 4 as an example, S303 can also be achieved through steps 31 to 37.

[0270] Step 31: The electronic device determines whether the overall score of the pipeline project is greater than the first score threshold. If yes, proceed to step 32; otherwise, proceed to step 33.

[0271] For example, the first scoring threshold is 80 points.

[0272] Step 32: If the overall score of the pipeline project is greater than the first score threshold, the feasibility level of the pipeline project is determined to be Level 1.

[0273] Step 33: The electronic device determines whether the overall score of the pipeline project is greater than the second scoring threshold. If yes, proceed to step 34; otherwise, proceed to step 35.

[0274] For example, the second scoring threshold is 60 points.

[0275] Step 34: If the electronic device responds to the pipeline project's overall score being greater than the second scoring threshold and less than or equal to the first scoring threshold, the pipeline project's feasibility level is determined to be Level 2.

[0276] Step 35: The electronic device determines whether the overall score of the pipeline project is greater than the third scoring threshold. If yes, proceed to step 36; otherwise, proceed to step 37.

[0277] For example, the third scoring threshold is 50 points.

[0278] Step 36: If the electronic device responds to the pipeline project's overall score being greater than the third scoring threshold and less than or equal to the second scoring threshold, the pipeline project's feasibility level is determined to be Level 3.

[0279] Step 37: If the overall score of the electronic device for the pipeline project is less than or equal to the third scoring threshold, the feasibility level of the pipeline project is determined to be Level 4.

[0280] It should be noted that the feasibility of the first level is greater than that of the second level, the feasibility of the second level is greater than that of the third level, and the feasibility of the third level is greater than that of the fourth level.

[0281] The feasibility levels for pipeline projects are categorized as follows: Level 1: This indicates a high-quality, fully feasible project, allowing for increased investment and accelerated construction. Level 2: This indicates a partially feasible project, requiring further refinement of details before implementation. Level 3: This indicates a temporarily infeasible project, requiring further analysis and assessment to identify existing problems and undergo re-evaluation. Level 4: This indicates an infeasible project, necessitating immediate termination to avoid resource waste.

[0282] In this way, the scientific validity of pipeline projects can be determined through evaluation, providing enterprises with a basis for decision-making and improving the accuracy and reliability of decisions.

[0283] The method provided in this application can also provide decision support for enterprises in project planning, market strategy formulation, and resource allocation. For example, if a pipeline project performs poorly in terms of natural gas usage indicators, the enterprise can increase its market development efforts and formulate targeted marketing strategies; if there are risks in terms of natural gas supply indicators, the enterprise can establish cooperative relationships with multiple natural gas suppliers in advance to ensure a stable supply of resources. Furthermore, this method can also perform in-depth data mining and analysis, enhancing the application value of the data. By setting detailed and scientific scoring standards, the accuracy and scientific nature of the evaluation results can be improved. It can also fully consider the differences in different regions, taking into account factors such as the economic development level, energy policies, and market structure of different regions, to obtain scores for multiple reference indicators. The weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators can be flexibly adjusted to better adapt to the evaluation needs of pipeline projects in different regions, providing enterprises with more targeted decision-making basis.

[0284] In a specific example, the aforementioned pipeline project evaluation method was applied to comprehensively assess a branch line project of a long-distance pipeline in a certain province. Data related to multiple reference indicators was obtained through various methods, including data on natural gas supply, natural gas usage, project competitiveness, regional consumption, project investment, intended cooperation, positive indicators, and negative indicators. By determining the scores of these reference indicators, the pipeline project's overall score was determined to be 78 points, placing its feasibility level at level two. Therefore, the project requires further refinement of details before proceeding. Based on this result, and considering the relatively low scores on natural gas supply and usage indicators, the company could actively negotiate with upstream suppliers to reduce costs and develop differentiated marketing strategies to highlight its product advantages during project implementation. After the pipeline project was completed and put into operation, it quickly captured market share and achieved good economic benefits.

[0285] In another specific example, a branch line project of a long-distance pipeline in another region, after evaluation using the aforementioned pipeline project evaluation method, received a comprehensive score of 45 points. This places the project's feasibility level at level four, indicating it is not feasible. The low scores across multiple reference indicators demonstrate serious problems across several dimensions. Based on the comprehensive score and the scores of multiple reference indicators, the company abandoned its investment plan for this project, avoiding potentially huge investment losses. Meanwhile, during the same period, some companies in the surrounding area failed to use the pipeline project evaluation method for scientific evaluation and blindly invested in similar projects. Ultimately, due to unstable resource supply and insufficient market demand, these projects suffered severe losses and even faced bankruptcy risks.

[0286] This application embodiment can divide the pipeline project evaluation device into functional modules or functional units according to the above method example. For example, each function can be divided into a separate functional module or functional unit, or two or more functions can be integrated into one processing module. The integrated module can be implemented in hardware or in software functional modules or functional units. The module or unit division in this application embodiment is illustrative and only represents one logical functional division; other division methods may be used in actual implementation.

[0287] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a pipeline project assessment device 50 provided in an embodiment of this application. The pipeline project assessment device 50 includes:

[0288] The first determining unit 501 is used to determine the scores of multiple reference indicators for the pipeline project based on the pipeline project data. These multiple reference indicators include natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, cooperation intention indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators. Specifically, the natural gas supply indicator indicates the natural gas supply situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the natural gas usage indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project competition indicator indicates the market competition situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the regional consumption indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project investment indicator indicates the capital investment situation in the pipeline project; and the cooperation intention indicator indicates the cooperation intention situation in the pipeline project. The second determining unit 502 is used to determine the comprehensive score of the pipeline project based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators. The third determining unit 503 is used to determine the feasibility of the pipeline project based on the comprehensive score of the pipeline project.

[0289] In one possible implementation, the second determining unit 502 is specifically used to: determine the weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators; and perform a weighted summation based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators and the weights corresponding to the multiple reference indicators to obtain a comprehensive score for the pipeline project.

[0290] In one possible implementation, the second determining unit 502 is used to: determine the weights corresponding to multiple reference indicators based on principal component analysis.

[0291] In one possible implementation, the third determining unit 503 is configured to: determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a first level in response to the pipeline project's overall score being greater than a first scoring threshold; determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a second level in response to the pipeline project's overall score being greater than a second scoring threshold and less than or equal to the first scoring threshold; determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a third level in response to the pipeline project's overall score being greater than a third scoring threshold and less than or equal to the second scoring threshold; and determine the feasibility level of the pipeline project as a fourth level in response to the pipeline project's overall score being less than or equal to the third scoring threshold; wherein the feasibility level of the first level is greater than the feasibility level of the second level, and the feasibility level of the second level is greater than the feasibility level of the third level, and the feasibility level of the third level is greater than the feasibility level of the fourth level.

[0292] In one possible implementation, natural gas supply indicators include the supply price of natural gas, the source of natural gas supply, the storage capacity of the source of natural gas, and the connection between the source of natural gas and external pipelines.

[0293] The first determining unit 501 is used to: determine the score of natural gas supply indicators based on the score of the natural gas supply price, the score of the natural gas supply source, the score of the gas storage status of the supply source, and the score of the connection status between the supply source and the external pipeline.

[0294] In one possible implementation, natural gas usage indicators include residential gas usage indicators, public institution gas usage indicators, heating gas usage indicators, transportation gas usage indicators, industrial gas usage indicators, and direct supply indicators for large users.

[0295] The first determining unit 501 is used to: determine the score of natural gas usage indicators based on the scores of residential gas consumption indicators, public institution gas consumption indicators, heating gas consumption indicators, transportation gas consumption indicators, industrial gas consumption indicators, and direct supply large user indicators.

[0296] In one possible implementation, the competitive indicators for the project include the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0297] The first determining unit 501 is used to: determine the scores of project competition indicators based on the scores of the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

[0298] In one possible implementation, the regional consumption indicators include per capita income indicators, energy self-sufficiency indicators, residential gas distribution indicators, and industrial gas distribution indicators. The energy self-sufficiency indicator is used to indicate the energy production and consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located. The residential gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fees charged to residents in the region where the pipeline project is located. The industrial gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fees charged to industrial users in the region where the pipeline project is located.

[0299] The first determining unit 501 is used to: determine the score of the regional consumption index based on the scores of per capita income, energy self-sufficiency, residential gas distribution, and industrial gas distribution.

[0300] In one possible implementation, the project investment indicators include the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project. The project turnover of the pipeline project is used to indicate the total amount of natural gas transported by the pipeline project through the pipeline, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project is used to indicate the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0301] The first determining unit 501 is used to: determine the score of project investment indicators based on the score of the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the score of the project turnover of the pipeline project, and the score of the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

[0302] In one possible implementation, the indicators of intended cooperation include those with upstream units, those with industrial users, those with large direct supply users, and those with downstream users.

[0303] The first determining unit 501 is used to: determine the score of the intended cooperation indicator based on the scores of the intended cooperation indicators with upstream units, the intended cooperation indicators with industrial users, the intended cooperation indicators with large direct supply users, and the intended cooperation indicators with downstream users.

[0304] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art will clearly understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, only the division of the above functional modules is used as an example. In practical applications, the above functions can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The specific working process of the system, device, and unit described above can be referred to the corresponding process in the foregoing method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0305] This application provides a computer program product containing instructions that, when run on an electronic device, cause the electronic device to execute the pipeline project evaluation method described in the above method embodiments.

[0306] This application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed on an electronic device, cause the electronic device to perform the pipeline project evaluation method in the method flow shown in the above method embodiments.

[0307] The computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable storage media include: electrical connections having one or more wires; portable computer disks; hard disks; random access memory (RAM); read-only memory (ROM); erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM); registers; hard disks; optical fibers; compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM); optical storage devices; magnetic storage devices; or any suitable combination thereof; or any other form of computer-readable storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to a processor, enabling the processor to read information from and write information to the storage medium. Of course, the storage medium may also be a component of the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). In the embodiments of this application, the computer-readable storage medium can be any tangible medium that contains or stores a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0308] Since the pipeline project evaluation device, computer-readable storage medium, and computer program product in the embodiments of this application can be applied to the above method, the technical effects that can be obtained can also be referred to the above method embodiments, and the embodiments of this application will not be repeated here.

[0309] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, devices, and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for instance, the division of units is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed may be through some interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection between devices or units may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0310] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0311] In addition, the functional units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit.

[0312] The above are merely specific embodiments of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any variations or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in this application should be included within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A pipeline project evaluation method, characterized in that, The method includes: Based on the data from the pipeline project, scores for multiple reference indicators are determined. These multiple reference indicators include natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, cooperation intention indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators. Specifically, the natural gas supply indicator indicates the natural gas supply situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the natural gas usage indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project competition indicator indicates the market competition situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the regional consumption indicator indicates the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located; the project investment indicator indicates the capital investment situation of the pipeline project; and the cooperation intention indicator indicates the cooperation intention situation of the pipeline project. Based on the scores of the aforementioned multiple reference indicators, a comprehensive score for the pipeline project is determined. The feasibility of the pipeline project is determined based on its comprehensive evaluation.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The determination of the comprehensive score for the pipeline project based on the scoring of the multiple reference indicators includes: Determine the weights corresponding to the multiple reference indicators; The comprehensive score of the pipeline project is obtained by weighting and summing the scores of the multiple reference indicators and their corresponding weights.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, Determining the weights corresponding to the plurality of reference indicators includes: Based on principal component analysis, the weights corresponding to the multiple reference indicators are determined.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The determination of the feasibility of the pipeline project based on a comprehensive evaluation includes: If the overall score of the pipeline project is greater than the first score threshold, the feasibility level of the pipeline project is determined to be Level 1. In response to the pipeline project's overall score being greater than a second scoring threshold and less than or equal to the first scoring threshold, the pipeline project's feasibility level is determined to be the second level. In response to the fact that the overall score of the pipeline project is greater than the third scoring threshold and less than or equal to the second scoring threshold, the feasibility level of the pipeline project is determined to be the third level. If the overall score of the pipeline project is less than or equal to the third scoring threshold, the feasibility level of the pipeline project is determined to be level four. The feasibility of the first level is greater than that of the second level, the feasibility of the second level is greater than that of the third level, and the feasibility of the third level is greater than that of the fourth level.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The natural gas supply indicators include the natural gas supply price, the natural gas supply source, the gas storage status of the supply source, and the connection status of the supply source with external pipelines; The process for determining the score of the natural gas supply indicator includes: The score of the natural gas supply index is determined based on the scores of the natural gas supply price, the natural gas supply source, the gas storage status of the supply source, and the connection status between the supply source and external pipelines.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The natural gas usage indicators include residential gas usage indicators, public institution gas usage indicators, heating gas usage indicators, transportation gas usage indicators, industrial gas usage indicators, and direct supply indicators for large users. The process for determining the score of the natural gas usage index includes: The score for the natural gas usage index is determined based on the scores for the residential gas consumption index, the public institution gas consumption index, the heating gas consumption index, the transportation gas consumption index, the industrial gas consumption index, and the direct supply large user index.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The competitive indicators for the project include the total natural gas volume of the competitors of the pipeline project, the number of pipelines of the competitors of the pipeline project, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the competitors of the pipeline project. The process for determining the scores of the project's competitive indicators includes: The competitive indicators of the pipeline project are determined based on the scores of the total natural gas volume of the pipeline project's competitors, the number of pipelines of the pipeline project's competitors, the supply price of the pipeline project, and the supply sources of the pipeline project's competitors.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The regional consumption indicators include per capita income, energy self-sufficiency, residential gas distribution, and industrial gas distribution. The energy self-sufficiency indicator is used to indicate the energy production and consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located. The residential gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fee charged to residents in the region where the pipeline project is located. The industrial gas distribution indicator is used to indicate the natural gas delivery service fee charged to industrial users in the region where the pipeline project is located. The process for determining the scores of the regional consumption indicators includes: The score of the regional consumption index is determined based on the scores of the per capita income index, the energy self-sufficiency index, the residential gas distribution index, and the industrial gas distribution index.

9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The project investment indicators include the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project. The project turnover of the pipeline project is used to indicate the total amount of natural gas transported by the pipeline project through the pipeline, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project is used to indicate the average transportation distance of the pipeline project. The process for determining the scoring of the project investment indicators includes: The project investment indicators are scored based on the scores of the cost per kilometer of the pipeline project, the project turnover rate of the pipeline project, and the average transportation distance of the pipeline project.

10. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The proposed cooperation indicators include those with upstream units, industrial users, large direct-supply users, and downstream users. The process for determining the scoring of the cooperation intention indicators includes: The score of the cooperation intention indicator is determined based on the scores of the cooperation intention indicators with upstream units, industrial users, large direct supply users, and downstream users.

11. A pipeline project evaluation device, characterized in that, The device includes: The first determining unit is used to determine the scores of multiple reference indicators for the pipeline project based on the data of the pipeline project. The multiple reference indicators include natural gas supply indicators, natural gas usage indicators, project competition indicators, regional consumption indicators, project investment indicators, cooperation intention indicators, positive indicators, and negative indicators. The natural gas supply indicator is used to indicate the natural gas supply situation in the region where the pipeline project is located. The natural gas usage indicator is used to indicate the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located. The project competition indicator is used to indicate the market competition situation in the region where the pipeline project is located. The regional consumption indicator is used to indicate the natural gas consumption situation in the region where the pipeline project is located. The project investment indicator is used to indicate the capital investment situation of the pipeline project. The cooperation intention indicator is used to indicate the cooperation intention situation of the pipeline project. The second determining unit is used to determine the comprehensive score of the pipeline project based on the scores of the multiple reference indicators; The third determining unit is used to determine the feasibility of the pipeline project based on the comprehensive score of the pipeline project.

12. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: A processor and a communication interface; the communication interface is coupled to the processor, the processor being configured to run computer programs or instructions to implement the pipeline project evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1-10.

13. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores instructions that, when executed by a computer, perform the pipeline project evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1-10.

14. A computer program product, characterized in that, The computer program product includes computer instructions that, when executed on a computer, cause the computer to perform the pipeline project evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1-10.

Images