Psychological treatment effect evaluation system, method, electronic device and product

Abstract

The application discloses a psychological treatment effect evaluation system and method, an electronic device and a product, relates to the technical field of psychological treatment effect evaluation, and comprises a project arrangement module, a device interaction module, a psychological evaluation module and an effect analysis module.The project arrangement module is used for arranging a psychological treatment project in response to a project arrangement instruction, and the psychological treatment project comprises a psychological evaluation step and a treatment step.The device interaction module is used for interacting with a psychological treatment device, executing the treatment step, and acquiring treatment data.The psychological evaluation module is used for executing the psychological evaluation step and acquiring psychological evaluation data.The effect analysis module is used for evaluating the effect of the psychological treatment project according to the psychological evaluation data and the treatment data.The application realizes the automatic acquisition of psychological treatment effect evaluation data, and can integrate psychological condition data and treatment parameters in the same system to form a closed-loop data chain of "treatment-evaluation", realize the automatic association and unified analysis of the psychological condition data and the treatment parameters, and thus improve the analysis and evaluation efficiency of the treatment effect.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation technology, and in particular to psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation systems, methods, electronic devices and products. Background Technology

[0002] Non-invasive brain stimulation technology is increasingly used in the adjunctive treatment of mental and psychological disorders (such as depression, anxiety, substance addiction, etc.) and in cognitive neuroscience research. In order to optimize the treatment effect, it is necessary to objectively evaluate the treatment effect of non-invasive brain stimulation technology.

[0003] Currently, evaluating the effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation therapy requires analyzing user psychological state assessment data. This evaluation process suffers from the following drawbacks: psychological state assessment tools are scattered across different paper questionnaires, independent computer software, or web pages. Operators need to prepare multiple paper questionnaires or switch between different platforms, making the process cumbersome and prone to errors. Paper questionnaires require manual data entry, which is inefficient and error-prone. Furthermore, different software generates data in inconsistent formats, making it difficult to unify the analysis with stimulation parameters (such as target points, intensity, and duration) obtained from non-invasive brain stimulation devices. Therefore, current methods for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy suffer from fragmented assessment tools and scattered assessment data, leading to inefficient and error-prone analysis of treatment outcomes.

[0004] The above content is only used to help understand the technical solution of this application and does not represent an admission that the above content is prior art. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The main purpose of this application is to provide a system, method, electronic device and product for evaluating the effect of psychotherapy, which aims to solve the technical problems of fragmented evaluation tools and scattered evaluation data in current methods of evaluating the effect of psychotherapy, resulting in low efficiency and easy error in the analysis and evaluation of treatment effect.

[0006] To achieve the above objectives, this application proposes a psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system, characterized in that the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system comprises: The project arrangement module is used to respond to project arrangement instructions and arrange psychotherapy projects, which include psychological assessment steps and treatment steps. The device interaction module is used to interact with the psychotherapy device, execute the treatment steps, and acquire treatment data; The psychological assessment module is used to perform the psychological assessment steps and acquire psychological assessment data; The effect analysis module is used to evaluate the effect of the psychotherapy program based on the associated psychological assessment data and the treatment data.

[0007] In one embodiment, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes a psychological test database module; The selected scales or tasks in the psychological assessment library module will be used as the psychological assessment content in the psychological assessment steps. The psychological assessment library module stores a psychological assessment scale library, a cognitive paradigm task library, and a simplified task library. The psychological assessment scale library includes at least one of the following: Symptom Self-Rating Scale, Depression Self-Rating Scale, Anxiety Self-Rating Scale, and Positive and Negative Symptom Scales. The cognitive paradigm task library includes at least one of the following: Emotional Face Recognition Paradigm Task and Associative Memory Task Paradigm Task. The simplified task library includes at least one of the following: Attention Assessment Task and Memory Task.

[0008] In one embodiment, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes a data object module; The data object module is used to store process data generated during the execution of a psychotherapy project. The process data includes metadata, treatment data, and psychological assessment data. The metadata includes the subject's identification code and the psychotherapy device's identification code. The treatment data includes the treatment parameters and treatment time actually output by the psychotherapy device when performing the treatment steps. The psychological assessment data includes the psychological assessment time and psychological assessment parameters generated when performing the psychological assessment steps.

[0009] In one embodiment, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes a process control module; The process control module is used to control the execution of the psychological assessment steps and the treatment steps according to the project process of the psychotherapy project; The project process includes the first number of times the psychological assessment step is executed and the second number of times the treatment step is executed, as well as the time for each execution of the psychological assessment step and the time for each execution of the treatment step; When the execution of any psychological assessment step occurs during the execution of a treatment step, the psychological assessment step is inserted during the execution of the treatment step. When the execution of any treatment step occurs during the execution of a psychological assessment step, the treatment step is inserted during the execution of the psychological assessment step.

[0010] In one embodiment, the process control module is used to control the execution of the psychological assessment step and the treatment step according to the project flow of the psychotherapy project, including: When the psychological assessment content includes any task from the cognitive paradigm task library, when the process control module controls the execution of any treatment step, the device interaction module sends the preset treatment parameters of the treatment step to the psychotherapy device, and after receiving the signal that the psychotherapy device has been started, records the treatment data through the data object module and immediately triggers the subsequent psychological assessment steps.

[0011] In one embodiment, the device interaction module, used for interacting with the psychotherapy device, includes: Scan the connection QR code of the psychotherapy device; The connection QR code is parsed to obtain the psychotherapy device identification code and connection verification key of the psychotherapy device; Based on the identification code of the psychotherapy device, the psychotherapy device is searched and matched via Bluetooth. Send the connection verification key to the psychotherapy device to establish a Bluetooth communication channel and establish a connection with the psychotherapy device.

[0012] In one embodiment, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes: The operation guidance module is used to provide standardized operation guidance; The progress indicator module is used to provide a task list and progress indicators; The user management module is used to manage users with different permissions. The offline management module is used to save offline data in environments without network access and automatically synchronize the data to the server when the network is restored. The data dashboard module is used to display the data trends of psychological status before and after treatment.

[0013] Furthermore, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a method for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy, the method comprising: In response to project scheduling instructions, schedule psychotherapy projects, which include psychological assessment steps and treatment steps; Interact with the psychotherapy device, perform the treatment steps, and obtain treatment data; Perform the aforementioned psychological assessment steps and obtain the psychological assessment data; The effectiveness of the psychotherapy program is evaluated based on the associated psychological assessment data and treatment data.

[0014] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes an electronic device, the device comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the computer program being configured to implement the steps of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method as described above.

[0015] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also proposes a storage medium, which is a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method described above.

[0016] In addition, to achieve the above objectives, this application also provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method described above.

[0017] The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system of this application first uses a project arrangement module to respond to project arrangement instructions and arrange psychotherapy projects. Each psychotherapy project includes psychological assessment steps and treatment steps, allowing users to customize these steps and achieve customized project arrangement. Next, it interacts with the psychotherapy device through a device interaction module to execute treatment steps and acquire treatment data. Simultaneously, it executes psychological assessment steps through a psychological assessment module to acquire psychological assessment data. The psychological assessment data and treatment data are then linked to construct a closed-loop data chain. Finally, the effectiveness analysis module evaluates the effectiveness of the psychotherapy project based on the psychological assessment data and treatment data.

[0018] This application utilizes a project arrangement module to uniformly arrange psychotherapy projects, including psychological assessment and treatment steps. This avoids the need for operators to prepare multiple paper questionnaires or switch between different platforms. Furthermore, it automates the acquisition of psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation data through device interaction and psychological assessment modules, avoiding the errors and inefficiencies associated with manual data entry. It also integrates psychological status data and treatment parameters into a single system, forming a closed-loop data chain of "treatment-assessment." This enables automatic correlation and unified analysis of psychological status data and treatment parameters, providing a data foundation for subsequent psychotherapy effectiveness analysis and evaluation, thereby improving the efficiency of treatment effectiveness analysis and evaluation and preventing assessment errors. Attached Figure Description

[0019] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with this application and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of this application.

[0020] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0021] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the module structure of the psychotherapy effect evaluation system according to Embodiment 1 of this application; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the module connections of the psychotherapy effect evaluation system according to Embodiment 1 of this application; Figure 3 This is a simplified schematic diagram of the project flow in Embodiment 2 of this application; Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of a scenario where the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system of this application is connected to psychotherapy equipment. Figure 5 This is a simplified flowchart of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method in Embodiment 3 of this application; Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the hardware operating environment of the psychotherapy effect evaluation system in this application embodiment.

[0022] The purpose, features, and advantages of this application will be further explained in conjunction with the embodiments and with reference to the accompanying drawings. Detailed Implementation

[0023] To make the above-mentioned objects, features, and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0024] Example 1 Non-invasive brain stimulation (NES) techniques are increasingly used in the adjunctive treatment of mental and psychological disorders (such as depression, anxiety, and substance addiction) and in cognitive neuroscience research. To objectively evaluate the intervention effects of NES, clinicians and researchers need to conduct systematic assessments of the subjects' psychological state and cognitive function before and after stimulation.

[0025] Currently, this process typically suffers from the following pain points: Fragmented tools: Assessment tools are scattered across different paper questionnaires, independent computer software, or web pages. Operators need to prepare multiple paper questionnaires or switch between different platforms, making the process cumbersome and prone to errors. Data silos: Paper questionnaires require manual data entry, which is inefficient and error-prone. Different software generates data in different formats, making it difficult to automatically correlate and unify the data with the stimulation parameters (such as target points, intensity, and duration) of non-invasive brain stimulation therapy devices. Non-standardized processes: Cognitive paradigms (such as face tasks and associative memory tasks) may differ in presentation and parameter settings across different laboratories, affecting the reliability and comparability of research results. Poor user experience: Participants may need to repeatedly learn how to use different software or switch back and forth between mobile phones, computers, and stimulation devices, resulting in an inconsistent experience.

[0026] Therefore, there is an urgent need for a lightweight solution that can standardize and integrate multiple assessment tools, seamlessly link with non-invasive brain stimulation therapy devices, and achieve integrated data management.

[0027] Based on this, embodiments of this application provide a psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system, referring to... Figure 1 The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system includes: The project arrangement module 10 is used to respond to project arrangement instructions and arrange psychotherapy projects, wherein the psychotherapy projects include psychological assessment steps and treatment steps. It should be noted that the project arrangement instructions are for arranging the content of a psychotherapy project. A psychotherapy project must include at least one treatment step and one psychological assessment step. The treatment step includes pre-treatment parameters and the execution time for that step, while the psychological assessment step includes the psychological assessment content and the execution time for that step, thus forming the flow of the psychotherapy project. As one example, a psychotherapy project may include one treatment step and two psychological assessment steps, with the flow being: "Psychological Assessment Step: Symptom Self-Rating Scale + Emotional Face Recognition Paradigm Task → Treatment Step: Transcranial Electrical Stimulation → Psychological Assessment Step: Symptom Self-Rating Scale + Emotional Face Recognition Paradigm Task." As another example, a psychotherapy project may include one treatment step and three psychological assessment steps, with the flow being: "Psychological Assessment Step: Emotional Face Recognition Paradigm Task → Treatment Step: Transcranial Electrical Stimulation → Psychological Assessment Step: Symptom Self-Rating Scale → Psychological Assessment Step: Emotional Face Recognition Paradigm Task." As another example, the psychotherapy program consists of one treatment step and three psychological assessment steps, with the process being: "Psychological assessment step: Associative memory paradigm task → Treatment step: Transcranial electrical stimulation → Psychological assessment step: Symptom self-rating scale → Psychological assessment step: Emotional face recognition paradigm task → Psychological assessment step: Associative memory paradigm task".

[0028] Additionally, it should be noted that the project arrangement module can be a module within the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program. The project arrangement module can be developed based on a visual drag-and-drop editor. Operators can issue project arrangement instructions through the operation interface provided by the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program. They can complete the custom arrangement of psychotherapy projects by clicking, dragging, editing, etc., or they can complete the arrangement of psychotherapy projects by calling the system's built-in standardized treatment project templates.

[0029] The device interaction module 20 is used to interact with the psychotherapy device, execute the treatment steps, and acquire treatment data; It should be noted that the device interaction module can be a module within a psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program. This mini-program can establish a connection with specific psychotherapy devices via near-field communication (NFC) technology and automatically record the device's treatment parameters and treatment time. For example, the operator can scan a QR code on the psychotherapy device using the mini-program to establish a connection. Alternatively, the mini-program can also connect to the psychotherapy device via Bluetooth or a wireless network.

[0030] Additionally, it should be noted that psychotherapy equipment can be transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) devices, transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) devices, biofeedback therapy devices, mindfulness training devices, and other devices capable of neuromodulation or psychological intervention. As an example, when the psychotherapy equipment is a TES device, the treatment data includes treatment parameters such as stimulation target point, current intensity, waveform, and duration.

[0031] The psychological assessment module 30 is used to perform the psychological assessment steps and acquire psychological assessment data; It should be noted that the psychological assessment module can be a module in the psychological therapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program. The psychological therapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program can display psychological assessment content on the operation interface, and the operator can answer the psychological assessment content on the operation interface. The psychological assessment module obtains psychological assessment data through the operator's answers. The psychological assessment data includes psychological assessment time, accuracy rate, reaction time, etc.

[0032] The effect analysis module 40 is used to evaluate the effect of the psychotherapy program based on the associated psychological assessment data and the treatment data.

[0033] It should be noted that in this implementation, treatment data and psychological assessment data within a single psychotherapy program will be linked, thus avoiding data fragmentation and the formation of information silos caused by the separation of psychotherapy and psychological assessment data. As an example, a psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system (such as a mini-program) can be applied to smart devices (such as mobile phones). These smart devices can connect to the psychotherapy equipment via communication methods (such as wireless networks or Bluetooth). The system can link the psychotherapy data obtained from the equipment with the psychological assessment data obtained from psychological tests completed on the smart device within a preset time period before and after connecting to the equipment, forming a closed-loop data chain of "treatment-assessment." This allows for the rapid generation of complete data required for effectiveness evaluation, eliminating the need to organize fragmented data from different platforms, thereby improving the convenience of treatment effectiveness evaluation and ensuring overall evaluation efficiency. The effectiveness analysis module can then analyze the linked psychological assessment and treatment data, quantitatively evaluating the effectiveness of the psychotherapy program through a method driven by the psychological assessment and treatment data. As an example, the correlated psychological assessment data and treatment data can be used to form a standardized matrix, which can then be input into a machine learning model or regression model to evaluate the effectiveness of the psychotherapy program.

[0034] Additionally, it should be noted that the effect analysis module can automatically generate a longitudinal dynamic change trajectory graph of core indicators (such as the total score of the self-rating depression scale and the average reaction time of the cognitive task) based on the treatment data and psychological assessment data completed by the subjects in each treatment and psychological assessment. The horizontal axis of this graph represents the number of treatment / test periods, and the vertical axis represents the indicator values, which is used to intuitively evaluate the stage-by-stage cumulative effect of transcranial electrical stimulation therapy.

[0035] Additionally, it should be noted that the effect analysis module can also record basic information, the identification code of the transcranial electrical stimulation device used, a summary of stimulation parameters (such as average current and total duration), scores of each scale factor, overall accuracy and average reaction time of each cognitive task, on a single line for each subject.

[0036] In this embodiment, the project arrangement module uniformly arranges psychotherapy projects including psychological assessment steps and treatment steps, avoiding the need for operators to prepare multiple paper questionnaires or switch between different platforms. The device interaction module and psychological assessment module collect treatment data and psychological assessment data, realizing the automated acquisition of psychotherapy effect evaluation data. This avoids the problems of error and low efficiency caused by manual data entry. Furthermore, psychological status data and treatment parameters can be integrated into the same system to form a closed-loop data chain of "treatment-assessment". This enables automatic association and unified analysis of psychological status data and treatment parameters, providing a data foundation for subsequent psychotherapy effect analysis and evaluation, thereby improving the efficiency of treatment effect analysis and evaluation.

[0037] In one feasible implementation, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes a psychological test database module; The selected scales or tasks in the psychological assessment library module will be used as the psychological assessment content in the psychological assessment steps. The psychological assessment library module stores a psychological assessment scale library, a cognitive paradigm task library, and a simplified task library. The psychological assessment scale library includes at least one of the following: Symptom Self-Rating Scale, Depression Self-Rating Scale, Anxiety Self-Rating Scale, and Positive and Negative Symptom Scales. The cognitive paradigm task library includes at least one of the following: Emotional Face Recognition Paradigm Task and Associative Memory Task Paradigm Task. The simplified task library includes at least one of the following: Attention Assessment Task and Memory Task.

[0038] It should be noted that the psychological assessment database stores scales such as the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCR), Depression Checklist-90 (DSR), Anxiety Checklist-90 (ASR), and Positive and Negative Symptom Checklist-90 (PSQR). The SCR-90, also known as the 90-item Symptom Checklist, is the most widely used non-specific self-assessment scale for psychological symptoms. It covers 10 symptom dimensions, including somatization, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and anxiety, with a total of 90 items. It uses a 5-point rating scale and is primarily used to screen the severity of various psychological symptoms. It can be used for screening in mental health clinics, monitoring treatment effectiveness, and conducting community mental health surveys. The Depression Checklist-90 (DSR) is a self-assessment scale specifically designed to assess depressive symptoms. It is particularly suitable for screening patients with mild to moderate depressive mood and depressive disorders. It has 20 items and uses a 4-point rating scale. It focuses on core depressive symptoms (low mood, loss of interest, etc.) and accompanying physical symptoms. It is easy to use and quick, and is commonly used for clinical depression screening and monitoring treatment effectiveness. The Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (HRAS) can also be used for self-assessment of depressive mood in the general population. The HAS is specifically designed to assess anxiety symptoms and is used to screen for anxiety, anxiety disorders, and related physical symptoms (such as palpitations, tension, restlessness, etc.). It has 20 items, a 4-point rating scale, and primarily reflects the subjective feelings and physical manifestations of anxiety. It is easy to use and widely applied in mental health clinics, communities, and businesses for anxiety symptom screening and treatment evaluation. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PSS) is a peer-rating scale (assessed by professionals) designed to assess schizophrenia symptoms. It is applicable to schizophrenia patients, contains 30 items, divided into three dimensions: positive symptoms (such as hallucinations and delusions), negative symptoms (such as emotional blunting and social withdrawal), and general psychopathological symptoms. It uses a 7-point rating scale and is primarily used for symptom assessment, severity grading, and treatment effect monitoring in schizophrenia. It is one of the core scales in psychiatric clinical practice and research.

[0039] Additionally, it should be noted that the cognitive paradigm task library is a database storing cognitive paradigm tasks such as the emotional face recognition paradigm task and the associative memory paradigm task. Among them, the emotional face recognition paradigm task is used to assess the ability to perceive and recognize emotions. By presenting facial expression pictures of different emotion types (such as happy, sad, angry, fearful, and neutral), subjects are required to quickly judge the emotion type and respond. It can quantitatively assess an individual's speed and accuracy in recognizing different emotions and is widely used in emotional psychology and clinical psychology (such as assessing abnormal emotional processing in people with depression and anxiety). It can also be combined with EEG and eye-tracking devices to record the physiological mechanisms of emotional processing. The associative memory paradigm task is an important branch of memory paradigms. Its core purpose is to assess associative memory ability (i.e., the ability to encode, store, and retrieve the association between two or more related stimuli). The common form is a two-stage "learning-testing" process. The learning stage presents paired stimuli (such as word-picture, face-scene), and the testing stage requires subjects to judge whether the stimulus pairing is consistent with that in the learning stage, or to recall another related stimulus based on one stimulus. It is often used for memory function assessment after memory impairment, cognitive aging, and neuromodulation therapy.

[0040] It is worth noting that the images used in the emotional face recognition paradigm task are standardized emotional face images. If the psychological assessment project includes the emotional face recognition paradigm task, the emotional face images for the task are determined based on preset emotional dimensions. These emotional dimensions include at least one of happiness, anger, fear, and neutrality. That is, the image library used in the emotional face recognition paradigm task has undergone standardization processing, and different emotional dimensions (such as happiness, anger, fear, and neutrality) can be selected according to research needs. The system can incorporate internationally recognized standardized image libraries, such as GAPED (Geneva Affective Pictogram Database). The emotional valence and arousal of these images have been verified for reliability and validity in large-sample populations. Standardization processing includes: Physical attribute equalization: To eliminate the interference of non-cognitive factors on the subject's response, the program processes all called images to ensure consistent size and viewing angle, and uniform brightness and contrast. Presentation mechanism standardization: The program strictly controls the duration of the gaze point (such as the "+" sign) before image presentation, as well as the milliseconds of target image presentation, eliminating errors caused by manual timing.

[0041] Additionally, it should be noted that the simplified task library is a database storing simplified tasks such as attention assessment tasks and memory tasks. Among them, attention assessment tasks are used to evaluate the ability to direct, allocate, maintain, and inhibit attention, and are one of the core tasks of cognitive assessment. Common types include: Stroop task (assessing attentional control and inhibition ability by measuring reaction time differences through stimuli with conflicting meanings of color and text), visual search task (assessing attentional direction and selection ability by requiring subjects to quickly find the target stimulus from distracting stimuli), Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (assessing attentional maintenance ability by presenting stimuli for an extended period of time and requiring subjects to respond to a specific target to test attentional concentration), and binaural listening task (assessing auditory attention allocation ability by requiring subjects to focus on listening to the sound from one earphone while ignoring distractions from the other ear). Memory tasks are used to assess the encoding, storage, and retrieval abilities of different types of memory, covering a variety of sub-types. Commonly used types include: episodic memory tasks (free recall / recognition tasks, assessing an individual's ability to remember specific scenes or events), working memory tasks (such as the n-back task, assessing short-term memory capacity and information processing ability, requiring subjects to judge whether the current stimulus is consistent with n previous stimuli), associative memory tasks (an important branch of memory, which, through a two-stage "learning-testing" process, presents paired stimuli such as words and pictures, assessing the ability to remember the association between stimuli), semantic memory tasks (vocabulary association / category judgment tasks, assessing an individual's memory of semantic information such as words and concepts), and procedural memory tasks (such as sequence reaction time tasks, assessing the ability to remember sequences of actions and skills).

[0042] Understandably, by maintaining standardized psychological assessment tools through a psychological assessment database module, scattered psychological assessment tools can be integrated into a unified platform. (See [link to relevant documentation]). Figure 2 A connection is established between the psychological assessment database module and the project arrangement module. When arranging psychotherapy projects, specific psychological assessment tools can be directly selected from the psychological assessment database as the psychological assessment content of the psychotherapy project. This ensures the standardization and repeatability of the psychological assessment process and improves the quality of scientific research data and the efficiency of clinical evaluation.

[0043] Additionally, it is understandable that by modularizing the psychological assessment database, new scales or cognitive paradigms can be easily added in the future to adapt to different research and clinical needs, thereby improving the scalability of the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system.

[0044] This embodiment uses a psychological assessment library module to store and maintain standardized psychological assessment tools. When arranging psychotherapy projects, specific psychological assessment tools can be directly selected from the psychological assessment library as the psychological assessment content of the psychotherapy project, which improves the reusability and scalability of the system.

[0045] In one feasible implementation, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes a data object module; The data object module is used to store process data generated during the execution of a psychotherapy project. The process data includes metadata, treatment data, and psychological assessment data. The metadata includes the subject's identification code and the psychotherapy device's identification code. The treatment data includes the treatment parameters and treatment time actually output by the psychotherapy device when performing the treatment steps. The psychological assessment data includes the psychological assessment time and psychological assessment parameters generated when performing the psychological assessment steps.

[0046] It should be noted that the data object module is used to store data generated during the execution of treatment and psychological assessment steps. Data generated during treatment steps includes treatment data produced during each treatment session by the psychotherapy device, primarily including treatment parameters and treatment time. Different treatment devices will generate different treatment parameters; for example, the treatment parameters for a transcranial electrical stimulation device are a stimulation target point of F3 and a current intensity of 1.5mA. Data generated during psychological assessment steps includes data generated each time a psychological assessment is performed on the user, including the psychological assessment time. Different psychological assessment content may generate different psychological assessment parameters; for example, assessment parameters include reaction time and accuracy. Optionally, treatment data and psychological assessment data belonging to the same subject identification code can be associated. Optionally, treatment data and psychological assessment data belonging to the same subject identification code and whose generation time span does not exceed a preset duration can be associated.

[0047] Additionally, it should be noted that a unified structured data object can be constructed through the data object module throughout the entire psychotherapy project. For example, this structured data object is in JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) format, and process data is recorded through this structured data object. After the psychotherapy project is completed, the process data is solidified within the same data package.

[0048] This embodiment uses a data object module to automatically aggregate psychological assessment data and treatment data, avoiding the problem of errors caused by manually aggregating heterogeneous data. Furthermore, manual aggregation makes it difficult to build a large-scale structured database containing a large number of subjects, which easily leads to data silos. The data object module can also avoid the problem of psychological assessment data and treatment data forming "data silos".

[0049] In one feasible implementation, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes a process control module; The process control module is used to control the execution of the psychological assessment steps and the treatment steps according to the project process information of the psychotherapy project; The project process includes the first number of times the psychological assessment step is executed and the second number of times the treatment step is executed, as well as the time for each execution of the psychological assessment step and the time for each execution of the treatment step; In the psychotherapy program, the psychological assessment steps and the treatment steps are performed alternately, and the psychotherapy program is completed when the psychological assessment steps reach the first number of executions and / or the treatment steps reach the second number of executions.

[0050] It should be noted that, see Figure 2 A connection is established between the process control module and the device interaction module, as well as between the process control module and the psychological assessment module, to flexibly control the execution of the psychological assessment and treatment steps through the process control module. Optionally, in one embodiment, the psychological testing step can be executed first to understand the initial psychological state of the test subject, and then the treatment step and the psychological assessment step can be executed alternately and cyclically. Optionally, the psychotherapy project can be determined to be completed after the treatment step has been executed a first number of times, or after the psychological assessment step has been executed a second number of times. In practical applications, the second number of executions is usually greater than the first number of executions. Therefore, optionally, after the treatment step has been executed a first number of times, the psychological assessment step can continue to be executed until the psychological assessment step has been executed a second number of times, at which point the psychotherapy project can be determined to be completed.

[0051] It is worth noting that the content of the psychological assessment items can be randomly refreshed during the psychological assessment process to prevent the practice effect.

[0052] This embodiment, through a process control module, can precisely control the execution rhythm of psychological assessment and treatment steps, clearly define the number of times and duration of each step, avoid process chaos, ensure the orderly progress of psychotherapy projects, and support flexible insertion between steps. It can reasonably interweave assessment and treatment steps based on the overlap in their execution times, improving process adaptability. This supports cognitive paradigms such as "learning-delay-testing" (e.g., associative memory tasks, spatial working memory tasks), and allows for precise insertion of treatment interventions such as transcranial electrical stimulation during the assessment process. This achieves synchronous integration of assessment and treatment without affecting the authenticity of the assessment data, while enabling real-time observation of the immediate impact of treatment on cognitive function, facilitating accurate evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Simultaneously, it simplifies the operation process and enhances the system's clinical applicability and research value.

[0053] In one feasible implementation, the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system further includes: The operation guidance module is used to provide standardized operation guidance; The progress indicator module is used to provide a task list and progress indicators; The user management module is used to manage users with different permissions. The offline management module is used to save offline data in environments without network access and automatically synchronize the data to the server when the network is restored. The data dashboard module is used to display the changing trends of psychological status data before and after treatment.

[0054] It should be noted that the user management module can be used to distinguish and manage researcher (doctor) accounts and subject accounts, achieving permission separation and data isolation.

[0055] Understandably, participants can complete all assessments using only their personal mobile phones, making the process clear and convenient. Researchers can remotely monitor progress, making the management of multi-center projects more efficient. A multi-center study refers to a psychotherapy project led by a primary research unit, conducted simultaneously in multiple independent medical institutions (such as multiple hospitals in different provinces or cities) or research laboratories according to the same standardized clinical trial protocol. Its purpose is to validate the efficacy of psychotherapy devices in a broader and more representative population. Traditional management may encounter problems such as heterogeneity of assessment tools and physical environments, human error in device parameter settings, data silos, and monitoring lag. This embodiment addresses these issues by allowing access to a standardized version uniformly distributed in the cloud via mobile terminals. Furthermore, the project orchestration module allows the lead administrator to uniformly set project processes and pre-treatment parameters, which branch center operators only need to execute. Simultaneously, a real-time global data dashboard allows the lead administrator to remotely monitor the real-time progress and abnormal data of all branch centers, achieving seamless and homogeneous management across regions and institutions.

[0056] Additionally, it should be noted that the data dashboard module provides researchers with data dashboards that display the data change trends of subjects or the entire group before and after treatment in the form of charts, and supports the export of raw data and analysis results in a standard format.

[0057] Additionally, it should be noted that the operation guidance module can provide standardized instructions before the start of a psychotherapy program and can optionally play audio to ensure that the subject understands the task requirements.

[0058] Additionally, it should be noted that the offline management module can automatically synchronize data to the server after completing a psychotherapy project in an environment without network access, once the network is restored.

[0059] Additionally, it should be noted that the progress notification module can provide a clear task list and progress prompts for the subjects, and provide researchers with real-time monitoring of the subjects' progress.

[0060] This embodiment enriches the functionality of the psychotherapy effect evaluation system by including an operation guidance module, a progress prompt module, a user management module, an offline management module, and a data dashboard module, thereby improving the system's user experience and ease of use.

[0061] Example 2 Based on the first embodiment of this application, in another embodiment of this application, the same or similar content as in the first embodiment described above can be referred to the above description and will not be repeated hereafter. In addition, the process control module is further used for: When the psychological assessment content in the psychological assessment step includes any one of the target cognitive paradigm tasks in the cognitive paradigm task library, after the encoding stage of the target cognitive paradigm task is executed, the device interaction module sends the preset treatment parameters of the treatment step to the psychotherapy device, and after receiving the signal that the psychotherapy device has been started, it records the treatment data through the data object module, and triggers the extraction stage of the target cognitive paradigm task after the psychotherapy device finishes treatment. The preset treatment parameters include at least one of stimulus type, stimulus intensity, stimulus frequency, duration of action and target location identifier.

[0062] It should be noted that the target cognition paradigm task may include an encoding stage, a delay stage, and a retrieval stage. The encoding stage refers to the process by which the subject first encounters, learns, and processes new information. The retrieval stage refers to the testing process in which the subject is asked to recall or recognize the previously learned material after a certain delay following the encoding stage. The preset treatment parameters include, but are not limited to, stimulus type, stimulus intensity, stimulus frequency, duration of action, and target location markers, which are used to drive the psychotherapy device to perform the corresponding intervention operations.

[0063] It is understood that this embodiment supports cognitive paradigms with the separation of "learning-delay-testing" phases (such as spatial working memory tasks, sequence learning tasks, etc.). Through the project orchestration module, treatment steps can be flexibly embedded between different cognitive stages according to experimental needs. That is, treatment steps can be inserted during the execution of psychological assessment steps. See [link to relevant documentation]. Figure 3 Treatment steps are inserted between the encoding and extraction phases.

[0064] As an example, the process control module monitors the execution progress of the current target cognitive paradigm task in real time. When it confirms that the encoding phase has been fully completed and the trigger signal indicating the end of the encoding phase has been captured, it sends the preset treatment parameters of the treatment step to the psychotherapy device through the device interaction module and starts the running timer of the treatment step. During the duration of the treatment step, the process control module does not trigger the start of the retrieval phase, but maintains the waiting state of the delayed phase, while continuously collecting and recording real-time running data during the treatment process through the data object module. When the process control module detects that the execution duration of the treatment step has reached the duration set in the preset treatment parameters and receives the treatment end status signal returned by the psychotherapy device, it automatically stops the stimulation output and releases the block on the start of the retrieval phase, thereby triggering the target cognitive paradigm task to enter the retrieval phase, allowing the subject to complete the memory recall or recognition test without treatment intervention interference. Throughout the above process, the overall execution flow of the psychological assessment steps is not interrupted; only a controlled treatment intervention window is inserted between the encoding and retrieval phases according to the arrangement, thereby achieving phase-isolated collaboration between treatment and assessment while ensuring the continuity of the assessment process.

[0065] In this embodiment, after the encoding phase, the psychotherapy assessment system app automatically sends a command to the device to initiate the treatment step; after the treatment step is completed, the stimulation automatically stops and seamlessly transitions to the retrieval phase. This effectively eliminates additional interference from the stimulation current on "attention" during encoding or "executive function" during retrieval.

[0066] In one feasible implementation, the device interaction module, used for interacting with the psychotherapy device, includes: Scan the connection QR code of the psychotherapy device; The connection QR code is parsed to obtain the psychotherapy device identification code and connection verification key of the psychotherapy device; Based on the identification code of the psychotherapy device, the psychotherapy device is searched and matched via Bluetooth. Send the connection verification key to the psychotherapy device to establish a Bluetooth communication channel and establish a connection with the psychotherapy device.

[0067] It should be noted that, see Figure 4The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program can call the WeChat QR code scanning API (Application Programming Interface) to scan the QR code of the psychotherapy device, and parse out the device's identity code and connection verification key. Then, the mini-program initializes the Bluetooth adapter, searches for and matches the psychotherapy device corresponding to the device's identity code. Next, the mini-program sends the connection verification key to the device. After the device completes the key verification, a secure Bluetooth communication channel is established. Once the communication channel is established, the device transmits treatment data to the mini-program in real time, and the mini-program receives and parses the treatment data.

[0068] Additionally, it should be noted that after establishing the Bluetooth communication channel, a time calibration command is sent to the psychotherapy device to force the internal clock of the psychotherapy device to synchronize with the standard time of the mobile terminal (or network server), thus laying the foundation for subsequent data alignment.

[0069] Additionally, it should be noted that the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program maintains a state machine model internally. When it receives an instruction to execute a psychotherapy project, the mini-program sends a start instruction containing preset parameters to the psychotherapy device. After that, the mini-program enters a waiting state until it receives an ACK (Acknowledgement) packet confirming that the psychotherapy device has successfully taken effect. Once the mini-program receives the ACK packet, it immediately records the current absolute timestamp and uses it as the zero point to synchronously trigger the cognitive task (such as face presentation) on the screen.

[0070] This embodiment achieves a secure connection between the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system mini-program and the psychotherapy device through a combination of QR code and Bluetooth communication. The system uses short-range Bluetooth communication, which effectively avoids the risks of remote control, ensures real-time data interaction with low latency, and improves communication security and the accuracy of treatment data. Simultaneously, the mini-program uses the unique device identification code and connection verification key carried in the QR code to accurately match and verify the identity of the target psychotherapy device, ensuring the uniqueness, accuracy, and security of the device connection.

[0071] Example 3 This application also provides a method for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy, referring to... Figure 5 , Figure 5 This is a flowchart illustrating the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation method of the present invention.

[0072] This invention provides an embodiment of a method for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy. It should be noted that although the flowchart shows a logical order, in some cases, the steps shown or described may be performed in a different order. In this embodiment, the method for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy includes steps S1-S4: Step S1: Respond to the project arrangement instruction and arrange the psychotherapy project, which includes psychological assessment steps and treatment steps; Step S2: Interact with the psychotherapy device and perform the treatment steps to obtain treatment data; Step S3: Perform the psychological assessment steps and obtain the psychological assessment data; Step S4: Evaluate the effectiveness of the psychotherapy program based on the associated psychological assessment data and treatment data.

[0073] The psychotherapy efficacy evaluation method provided in this application, applied to the psychotherapy efficacy evaluation system in the above embodiments, can solve the technical problems of fragmented evaluation tools and scattered evaluation data in current psychotherapy efficacy evaluation methods, which lead to low efficiency and susceptibility to errors in the analysis and evaluation of treatment effects. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the psychotherapy efficacy evaluation method provided in this application are the same as those of the psychotherapy efficacy evaluation system provided in the above embodiments, and other technical features in the psychotherapy efficacy evaluation method are the same as those disclosed in the above embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0074] This application provides an electronic device, which includes: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, the instructions being executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the psychotherapy effect evaluation method in Embodiment 1 above.

[0075] The following is for reference. Figure 6 The diagram illustrates a structural schematic of an electronic device suitable for implementing embodiments of this application. The electronic devices in these embodiments may include, but are not limited to, mobile terminals such as mobile phones, laptops, digital broadcast receivers, PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants), PADs (Portable Application Descriptions), PMPs (Portable Media Players), in-vehicle terminals (e.g., in-vehicle navigation terminals), and fixed terminals such as digital TVs and desktop computers. Figure 6 The electronic device shown is merely an example and should not impose any limitation on the functionality and scope of use of the embodiments of this application.

[0076] like Figure 6 As shown, the electronic device may include a processing unit 1001 (e.g., a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, etc.), which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in a read-only memory 1002 or a program loaded from a storage device 1003 into a random access memory 1004. The random access memory 1004 also stores various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device. The processing unit 1001, the read-only memory 1002, and the random access memory 1004 are interconnected via a bus 1005. An input / output interface 1006 is also connected to the bus. Typically, the following systems can be connected to the input / output interface 1006: input devices 1007 including, for example, touchscreens, touchpads, keyboards, mice, image sensors, microphones, accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc.; output devices 1008 including, for example, liquid crystal displays (LCDs), speakers, vibrators, etc.; storage devices 1003 including, for example, magnetic tapes, hard disks, etc.; and communication devices 1009. The communication device 1009 allows the electronic device to communicate wirelessly or wiredly with other devices to exchange data. Although the diagrams show electronic devices with various systems, it should be understood that it is not required to implement or have all of the systems shown. More or fewer systems may be implemented alternatively.

[0077] Specifically, according to the embodiments disclosed in this application, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts can be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments disclosed in this application include a computer program product comprising a computer program carried on a computer-readable medium, the computer program containing program code for performing the methods shown in the flowcharts. In such embodiments, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from a network via a communication device, or installed from storage device 1003, or installed from read-only memory 1002. When the computer program is executed by processing device 1001, it performs the functions defined in the methods of the embodiments disclosed in this application.

[0078] The electronic device provided in this application, employing the psychotherapy effect evaluation method described in the above embodiments, can solve the technical problems of fragmented evaluation tools and scattered evaluation data in current psychotherapy effect evaluation methods, leading to low efficiency and susceptibility to errors in the analysis and evaluation of treatment effects. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the electronic device provided in this application are the same as those of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method provided in the above embodiments, and other technical features of the electronic device are the same as those disclosed in the previous embodiment method, and will not be repeated here.

[0079] It should be understood that the various parts disclosed in this application can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the description of the above embodiments, specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples.

[0080] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any variations or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technology disclosed in this application should be included within the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be determined by the scope of the claims.

[0081] This application provides a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program instructions (i.e., a computer program) stored thereon, the computer-readable program instructions being used to perform the psychotherapy effect evaluation method in the above embodiments.

[0082] The computer-readable storage medium provided in this application may be, for example, a USB flash drive, but is not limited to, electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems or devices, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media may include, but are not limited to: electrical connections having one or more wires, portable computer disks, hard disks, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination thereof. In this embodiment, the computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium containing or storing a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system or device. The program code contained on the computer-readable storage medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to: wires, optical cables, RF (Radio Frequency), etc., or any suitable combination thereof.

[0083] The aforementioned computer-readable storage medium may be included in an electronic device or may exist independently without being assembled into an electronic device.

[0084] The aforementioned computer-readable storage medium carries one or more programs, which, when executed by an electronic device, cause the electronic device to perform the psychotherapy effect evaluation method provided in the above embodiments.

[0085] Computer program code for performing the operations of this application can be written in one or more programming languages ​​or a combination thereof, including object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, Smalltalk, and C++, and conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as the "C" language or similar programming languages. The program code can be executed entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, as a standalone software package, partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In cases involving remote computers, the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer via any type of network—including a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN)—or can be connected to an external computer (e.g., via the Internet using an Internet service provider).

[0086] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of this application. In this regard, each block in a flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, segment, or portion of code containing one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions indicated in the blocks may occur in a different order than those indicated in the drawings. For example, two consecutively indicated blocks may actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they may sometimes be executed in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, can be implemented using a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or using a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0087] The modules described in the embodiments of this application can be implemented in software or hardware. The names of the modules do not necessarily limit the functionality of the unit itself.

[0088] The readable storage medium provided in this application is a computer-readable storage medium that stores computer-readable program instructions (i.e., a computer program) for executing the above-described method for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy. This addresses the technical problem that current methods for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy suffer from fragmented evaluation tools and scattered evaluation data, leading to low efficiency and susceptibility to errors in the analysis and evaluation of treatment effects. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the computer-readable storage medium provided in this application are the same as those of the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation method provided in the above embodiments, and will not be elaborated upon here.

[0089] This application also provides a computer program product, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method described above.

[0090] The computer program product provided in this application can solve the technical problems of current methods for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy, which suffer from fragmented evaluation tools and scattered evaluation data, leading to low efficiency and susceptibility to errors in the analysis and evaluation of treatment effects. Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the computer program product provided in this application are the same as those of the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation method provided in the above embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0091] The above description is only a part of the embodiments of this application and does not limit the patent scope of this application. All equivalent structural transformations made under the technical concept of this application and using the contents of the specification and drawings of this application, or direct / indirect applications in other related technical fields, are included in the patent protection scope of this application.

Claims

1. A psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system, characterized in that, The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system includes: The project arrangement module is used to respond to project arrangement instructions and arrange psychotherapy projects, which include psychological assessment steps and treatment steps. The device interaction module is used to interact with the psychotherapy device to perform the treatment steps and acquire treatment data; The psychological assessment module is used to perform the psychological assessment steps and acquire psychological assessment data; The effect analysis module is used to evaluate the effect of the psychotherapy program based on the associated psychological assessment data and the treatment data.

2. The psychotherapy efficacy evaluation system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system also includes a psychological assessment database module; The selected scales or tasks in the psychological assessment library module will be used as the psychological assessment content in the psychological assessment steps. The psychological assessment library module stores a psychological assessment scale library, a cognitive paradigm task library, and a simplified task library. The psychological assessment scale library includes at least one of the following: Symptom Self-Rating Scale, Depression Self-Rating Scale, Anxiety Self-Rating Scale, and Positive and Negative Symptom Scales. The cognitive paradigm task library includes at least one of the following: Emotional Face Recognition Paradigm Task and Associative Memory Task Paradigm Task. The simplified task library includes at least one of the following: Attention Assessment Task and Memory Task.

3. The psychotherapy efficacy evaluation system as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system also includes a data object module; The data object module is used to store process data generated during the execution of a psychotherapy project. The process data includes metadata, treatment data, and psychological assessment data. The metadata includes the subject's identification code and the psychotherapy device's identification code. The treatment data includes the treatment parameters and treatment time actually output by the psychotherapy device when performing the treatment steps. The psychological assessment data includes the psychological assessment time and psychological assessment parameters generated when performing the psychological assessment steps.

4. The psychotherapy efficacy evaluation system as described in claim 3, characterized in that, The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system also includes a process control module; The process control module is used to control the execution of the psychological assessment steps and the treatment steps according to the project process information of the psychotherapy project; The project process information includes the first number of times the psychological assessment step is executed and the second number of times the treatment step is executed, as well as the time for each execution of the psychological assessment step and the time for each execution of the treatment step; In the psychotherapy program, the psychological assessment steps and the treatment steps are performed alternately, and the psychotherapy program is completed when the psychological assessment steps reach the first number of executions and / or the treatment steps reach the second number of executions.

5. The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system as described in claim 4, characterized in that, The process control module is also used for: When the psychological assessment content in the psychological assessment step includes any one of the target cognitive paradigm tasks in the cognitive paradigm task library, after the encoding stage of the target cognitive paradigm task is executed, the device interaction module sends the preset treatment parameters of the treatment step to the psychotherapy device, and after receiving the signal that the psychotherapy device has been started, it records the treatment data through the data object module, and triggers the extraction stage of the target cognitive paradigm task after the psychotherapy device finishes treatment. The preset treatment parameters include at least one of stimulus type, stimulus intensity, stimulus frequency, duration of action and target location identifier.

6. The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The device interaction module, used for interacting with the psychotherapy device, includes: Scan the connection QR code of the psychotherapy device; The connection QR code is parsed to obtain the psychotherapy device identification code and connection verification key of the psychotherapy device; Based on the identification code of the psychotherapy device, the psychotherapy device is searched and matched via Bluetooth. Send the connection verification key to the psychotherapy device to establish a Bluetooth communication channel and establish a connection with the psychotherapy device.

7. The psychotherapy efficacy evaluation system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system also includes: The operation guidance module is used to provide standardized operation guidance; The progress indicator module is used to provide a task list and progress indicators; The user management module is used to manage users with different permissions. The offline management module is used to save offline data in environments without network access and automatically synchronize the data to the server when the network is restored. The data dashboard module is used to display the data trends of psychological status before and after treatment.

8. A method for evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy, characterized in that, The psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation system according to any one of claims 1-7, wherein the psychotherapy effectiveness evaluation method comprises: In response to project scheduling instructions, schedule psychotherapy projects, which include psychological assessment steps and treatment steps; Interact with the psychotherapy device, perform the treatment steps, and obtain treatment data; Perform the aforementioned psychological assessment steps and obtain the psychological assessment data; The effectiveness of the psychotherapy program is evaluated based on the associated psychological assessment data and treatment data.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that, The device includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the computer program being configured to implement the steps of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method as described in claim 8.

10. A computer program product, characterized in that, The computer program product includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the psychotherapy effect evaluation method as described in claim 8.

Images