Magnetic resonance type partitioned vertical electromagnetic induction positive generator

Abstract

This perpetual motion generator electromagnetic braking torque is equal to zero, no matter whether the load or full speed will not change. The key is the structure of electromagnetic induction is different from the structure of the traditional generator, the traditional generator belongs to "positive flat electromagnetic induction", my perpetual motion generator belongs to "positive vertical electromagnetic induction". Positive vertical electromagnetic induction in the process of running makes it produce "vertical effect", this vertical effect produces both electromagnetic braking torque and electromagnetic torque, the two opposite forces cancel each other out. The stator core is a separate form, there are six separate processing location, a separate processing range has two teeth, a tooth has a coil, teeth are positive vertical electromagnetic induction site. The rotor excitation polarity is in the same pole of the opposite state, this same pole of the corresponding state I call it "magnetic resonance state", so that the efficiency of the perpetual motion generator greatly enhanced.

Description

[0001] Technical Field: Motors

[0002] Background Technology: The principle of electromagnetic induction in traditional generators is the same. The reason they cannot become perpetual motion generators is that they cannot eliminate electromagnetic braking torque. Electromagnetic braking torque is determined by the structure of electromagnetic induction. For example, the magnetic lines of force of the rotor poles and the stator poles are in a straight line. In this straight electromagnetic induction, the angle between the magnetic lines of force in the air gap is only zero degrees. I call this zero-degree electromagnetic induction "positive straight electromagnetic induction." The result of this positive straight electromagnetic induction is that when one polarity of the generator excitation is directed towards the coil and the iron core, they repel each other; when it is directed away from the coil and the iron core, they attract each other. Just like a boat moving upstream in a flowing river, it inevitably requires a huge amount of power.

[0003] Thirty years after Faraday published his theory of electromagnetic induction, humanity created the first industrially practical generator, thanks to the use of silicon steel sheets that reduced electromagnetic braking torque. If the generator's core used only ordinary magnetic materials, the electromagnetic braking torque would be even greater; a 1000-watt generator would require approximately a 5000-watt motor to drive it. If the generator used insulating materials to line the stator coils, electromagnetic braking torque would still exist, but efficiency would be low, with the electromotive force only about half that of the original generator. Even now, a 1000-watt generator requires approximately a 1500-watt motor to drive it. After eight years of research (starting before 2006), I finally eliminated electromagnetic braking torque.

[0004] Summary of the invention: The stator core of this perpetual motion generator is partitioned. Figure 2 Six sections have been marked with isolation treatment. Without this isolation treatment, efficiency would be significantly reduced. Overall, the stator core is similar to that of a traditional generator. The toothed shape of the stator core indicates the placement of the coils, and the slots are the junctions between two coils.

[0005] The electromagnetic induction method used is "positive vertical electromagnetic induction," while traditional generators use "positive horizontal electromagnetic induction." Compared to traditional electromagnetic induction, the polarity of the excitation differs by 90 degrees, and the magnetic lines of force generated by the stator core and coils are also at a 90-degree angle to the excitation magnetic lines of force. Therefore, this perpetual motion generator uses positive vertical electromagnetic induction. Positive vertical electromagnetic induction is more efficient than other types of vertical electromagnetic induction. Vertical electromagnetic induction inevitably leads to a vertical effect, which changes the electromagnetic braking torque. Its inherent factor is that during operation, both electromagnetic torque and electromagnetic braking torque are generated, and these two opposing forces cancel each other out. Therefore, the electromagnetic braking torque is equal to zero or a slightly negative number.

[0006] The excitation polarities of this perpetual motion generator are in a state of opposite polarities, meaning that the S pole of one excitation is opposite to the S pole of another; and the N pole is opposite to the N pole of another. I call this state of opposite polarities a "magnetic resonance state." This magnetic resonance state structure greatly improves the efficiency of electromagnetic induction. Adding an iron core in the middle of the magnetic resonance state further improves efficiency; I call this iron core a "resonance iron core." This resonance state of several opposite magnetic poles forms a circular rotor, and the sides of the circular rotor act on the stator iron core and coils. During operation, the magnetic lines of force generated by the stator and coils remain perpendicular to the magnetic lines of force of the rotor, and this electromagnetic induction is called "positive perpendicular electromagnetic induction."

[0007] This perpetual motion generator is called a magnetic resonance type because the efficiency of electromagnetic induction is greatly improved under magnetic resonance conditions. I call it magnetic resonance because the strength of the magnetic field increases when like-pole permanent magnets are in a close-range repulsive state. I discovered more than ten years ago that the repulsive force of permanent magnets is greater than the attractive force, and when I applied this kind of like-pole permanent magnet to electromagnetic induction, I felt a miracle had occurred.

[0008] Physics has not revealed that the repulsive force of permanent magnets is greater than their attractive force. I call it magnetic resonance because it shares similarities with wave resonance; both occur under conditions of opposing forces. The only difference is that permanent magnets do not produce waves, yet they still propagate at the speed of light in a vacuum. Traditional physics' magnetic resonance and nuclear magnetic resonance require the presence of an alternating magnetic field; the resonance occurs when the frequency of the alternating magnetic field corresponds to the frequency of the magnetic field of another substance. However, the magnetic resonance I'm discussing does not require an alternating magnetic field. Electromagnetic waves can resonate, but electromagnetic waves possess both magnetic and electric fields. Current physics does not reveal the existence of an electric field in permanent magnets; it only states that "a changing magnetic field produces an electric field." This implies that permanent magnets are constant magnetic fields and therefore lack an electric field. However, I have discovered that permanent magnets do indeed possess an electric field.

[0009] To demonstrate that permanent magnets possess an electric field, an experiment can be conducted. Figure 4It's a square permanent magnet, an imagined rational simulation. The small black dots represent magnetic field lines flowing from the paper, and the closed concentric circles represent electric field loops (the larger the radius, the stronger the electric field). Imagine the black straight line as a conductor, its left end remaining at the small black dot in the center. Rotate it clockwise or counter-clockwise like the hand of a clock, but the electromotive force (EMF) of this conductor is zero. That is, the conductor cutting the magnetic field lines doesn't generate an EMF. If the conductor moves upward or downward as a whole, the EMF is not zero. This is because the conductor induces a change in the magnitude of the electric field within the electric field loop, creating a potential difference, thus generating an EMF. However, when the conductor moves clockwise, the induced electric field is constant everywhere; without a change in the electric field magnitude, there is no potential difference, so the EMF is zero. This demonstrates that the generation of EMF mainly depends on the electric field, not the magnetic field lines. Wherever a magnetic field exists, an electric field must also exist; wherever an electric field exists, a magnetic field must also exist. For example, when an electric current is passed through a straight conductor, an electric field moves through the conductor, and a concentric magnetic field is formed around the conductor. A gaussmeter cannot measure the existence of the magnetic field. The concentric magnetic field can be obtained through an iron powder experiment.

[0010] Experiments have proven that permanent magnets also possess electric fields or electric field loops. Although they lack changing magnetic and electric fields, they can still resonate. The resonance of waves can be determined by their amplitude; the resonance of permanent magnets can be determined by the strength of their magnetic field. An enhanced magnetic field necessarily enhances the electric field. Resonance occurs when like-pole magnetic fields are in a close, opposing state, and the enhanced magnetic and electric fields are inversely proportional to the distance between the like poles in the resonance state. The underlying principle of magnetic resonance is the mutual activation of diamagnetism or antimagnetism. If the strength difference between the like-pole opposing magnetic fields is too great, such as approximately five times, the weak magnet will transform into a paramagnet, becoming attracted instead of repelled. For example, if you forcefully press your hands together, the weak magnets become paramagnetic and attract each other, and this attraction does not reverse when separated.

[0011] In other words, this magnetic resonance is similar to wave resonance, and also similar to yet contradictory to the logic of addition and subtraction of positive and negative numbers. For example, at close range, opposing magnetic fields with the same poles activate each other's antimagnetism, and the magnetic fields reinforce each other. If the difference in strength between the two magnetic fields is too great, the polarity of the weaker magnetic field will change in the opposite direction. This phenomenon is sufficient to prove that under conditions of close range or zero distance, changes occur inside the magnet, either reinforcing each other or reversing into paramagnetism.

[0012] Attached image description: Figure 1 Cross-sectional view, Figure 2These are cross-sectional views; both images show the entire structure of the generator. The material supporting the excitation between the casing and rotor is non-magnetic; otherwise, efficiency would decrease. The rotor excitation polarities are all in a state of opposite polarities, with an iron core in between – this is the necessary structure for magnetic resonance. The orientation of the rotor excitation polarity is 90 degrees from the orientation of the stator core and coils. This generator, like traditional generators, uses forward electromagnetic induction; however, the structure of the rotor excitation polarity in this generator is shifted by 90 degrees, thus fulfilling the conditions for "forward vertical electromagnetic induction." Figure 3 This is a diagram showing the unfolded structure of the stator core and coils. The stator teeth have a certain slant to reduce resistance during generator startup and to ensure the generator waveform reaches a positive sine wave. If the rotor has a certain slant, the stator should not have a slant. Figure 4 It's a square permanent magnet, an imagined, rational simulation. The small black dots represent magnetic field lines flowing from the paper, and the closed concentric circles represent electric field loops. The larger the electric field loop, the stronger the electric field. The straight line represents a wire. This diagram has already been shown earlier to demonstrate that permanent magnets also possess electric fields or electric field loops. Figure 5 This is to explain why positive flat electromagnetic induction has electromagnetic braking torque (traditional generators all have positive flat electromagnetic induction). The cube in the middle is a permanent magnet. Whether it moves to the left or to the right of the dotted square, it will attract each other. However, if it moves from the dotted square to the middle, it will repel each other. Therefore, traditional generators can never overcome electromagnetic braking torque. Figure 6 This is to indicate four forms without electromagnetic braking torque, to distinguish this generator from the other three forms, and to avoid confusion. A belongs to "positive vertical electromagnetic induction" (this generator is formed in this way); B belongs to "longitudinal vertical electromagnetic induction"; C belongs to "lateral vertical electromagnetic induction"; D belongs to "lateral cross electromagnetic induction". All of these forms lack electromagnetic braking torque, but their efficiencies differ. Figure 7 To further explain the efficiency of this generator, A is in a non-resonant state with positive vertical electromagnetic induction; B is in a resonant state with positive vertical electromagnetic induction. When the permanent magnet of A moves to the left of the dashed box, the generated electromotive force is 1. When the resonant structure of B moves to the left by the same distance as A, the electromotive force of B is 2.273 times greater than that of A. This is the unexpected result produced by the resonant electromagnetic induction.

[0013] Let's take another look at how adjusting the size of the insulator in the resonant region changes the electromotive force. Figure 7The diagram I drew is exactly half the size of the actual object I used in my experiment. The lengths of the insulators in diagrams B, C, and D are all different. When the electromotive force (EMF) generated in experiment C is 1, the EMF generated in B is 1.23 times greater than that in C, and the EMF generated in D is 1.4 times greater than that in C. This shows that the intensity of resonance is inversely proportional to the size of the distance. We can only choose a resonance region whose size is equal to or smaller than the cross-sectional area of ​​the stator core. Furthermore, when we replace the insulator in the resonance region with an iron core, the EMF increases by 1.2 times. How can we explain this phenomenon? Does the addition of an iron core enhance the magnetic field in the resonance region? I think this is impossible. It's like a 3000 Gauss permanent magnet attracting an iron block; it's impossible for the permanent magnet to suddenly become 3600 Gauss. For example, a 40×40 mm permanent magnet with a thickness of 5 mm has an EMF of 3000 Gauss, which is z. When a 40×40 mm iron plate with a thickness of 10 mm is added to the back of this permanent magnet, the generated EMF is greater than z. The reason is that the electric field of the iron plate is activated, and this electric field passes through the permanent magnet, increasing the density and intensity of the permanent magnet's electric field. If the thickness of the permanent magnet is more than 30 millimeters, adding an iron plate on the back will not increase the generated electromotive force (EMF) because the activated electric field of the iron plate cannot reach the surface of the permanent magnet due to its thickness. This further proves that the generation of EMF mainly depends on the electric field. The existence of an electric field necessarily implies the existence of a magnetic field, and vice versa.

[0014] Detailed Implementation: The emergence of a new technology inevitably involves a breakthrough in new theory, and a breakthrough in new theory is always based on experimentation. Through years of experimental work, a new concept of electromagnetic induction has been developed. This new concept is "vertical electromagnetic induction," which inevitably leads to the generation of a "vertical effect," thus eliminating electromagnetic braking torque.

[0015] Traditional generators use "forward linear electromagnetic induction," while my perpetual motion generator uses "forward vertical electromagnetic induction." Therefore, the stator core of my perpetual motion generator must be isolated using non-magnetic materials. To avoid overheating, high-strength, high-temperature resistant insulating materials are best. The thickness of the isolation material is adjusted according to the excitation strength; the stronger the excitation, the thicker the isolation material.

[0016] The rotor's excitation and resonant cores should be glued together and secured with reinforcing screws to form a unified structure, preventing separation during high-speed operation. The resonant core should be equal to or smaller than the width of the stator core's induction area, as the intensity of magnetic resonance is inversely proportional to the distance between the resonant regions. Using pure iron (5% impurities) for the resonant core yields better results. If the rotor's excitation is an electromagnet, a resonant core is also essential; if the electromagnet's core is a single unit, resonance will not occur or will be ineffective.

[0017] The induction area of ​​the stator should have a certain slope to avoid high starting resistance and to prevent waveform and radio interference.

[0018] Under the same volume conditions, the longer shape of this generator results in higher efficiency.

[0019] For better results, ultra-thin (0.1 to 0.01 mm) pure iron sheets (5% impurities) can be used for the stator core, and there must be a suitable insulation layer between the iron sheets.

[0020] The material used to support the excitation in the rotor is a non-magnetic material, preferably a high-strength aluminum alloy, which can reduce weight, reduce bearing friction, and extend bearing life.

Claims

1. "Positive vertical electromagnetic induction" puts the magnetic lines of force between the rotor and stator at a 90-degree angle, resulting in a vertical effect. In the actual operation, the vertical effect generates both electromagnetic braking torque and electromagnetic torque. The two opposing forces cancel each other out, so the electromagnetic braking torque is equal to zero.

2. The stator core is a partitioned type with several partitioned positions. Within each partitioned area, there are two protruding tooth-like bodies. Each tooth-like body has a coil. The top area of ​​the tooth-like body is the part that generates positive vertical electromagnetic induction.

3. The polarity of the rotor excitation is in a state of opposite polarity, and there is an iron core in the middle of the opposite polarity. This state of opposite polarity is called magnetic resonance state (resonance state, resonance region), and the iron core in the resonance region is the resonance iron core.

4. In the rotor, non-magnetic materials should be used for the parts that support the excitation; otherwise, the efficiency will be reduced.

5. The casing should be made of non-magnetic material; otherwise, efficiency will be affected.

6. The rotor's "resonance core" should have a width equal to or less than the width of the top of the stator core teeth for optimal efficiency.

7. The teeth of the stator core must have a certain slope to avoid high resistance when the generator starts and to prevent the alternating waveform of the generator from interfering with radio waves.

Images