Antenna sensitivity interference test method and system, computer device and storage medium

Abstract

The application relates to the technical field of router testing, in particular to an antenna sensitivity interference test method and system, computer equipment and a storage medium, the method comprising the following steps: performing line loss calibration on a test device to obtain line loss compensation of the test device; performing radiation sensitivity test on an antenna of the test device based on the line loss compensation to obtain basic radiation sensitivity; after the test device is connected with a test optical module, performing radiation sensitivity test on the antenna of the test device based on the line loss compensation to obtain interference radiation sensitivity; and determining whether the antenna sensitivity of the test device is abnormal according to the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity. Therefore, the interference degree of the optical module on the antenna signal sensitivity of the test device can be accurately tested.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of router testing technology, and in particular to an antenna sensitivity interference testing method, system, computer equipment, and storage medium. Background Technology

[0002] In existing technologies, optical modules, as high-speed optoelectronic conversion devices, generate wideband (fundamental frequency up to 30 GHz and above) switching noise during operation, due to their internal components such as laser driver chips and SerDes transceivers. This noise is mainly coupled to the Wi-Fi RF link through three paths: spatial radiation coupling—high-frequency harmonics (such as the second harmonic of 20 GHz and the third harmonic of 30 GHz in 10G optical modules) leak through non-ideal shielding structures, and their sideband energy can penetrate down to the 2.4 GHz band, overlapping with the Wi-Fi channel (such as CH6 / CH11); conducted coupling—noise crosstalks to sensitive power supply networks such as 3.3 V / 1.0 V through the power plane, ground bounce, or SerDes signal line impedance discontinuities, thereby modulating the LNA / mixer bias point and degrading the receiver linearity; however, the industry has long lacked systematic testing and evaluation of this type of interference. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In view of this, embodiments of this application provide an antenna sensitivity interference testing method, system, computer equipment, and storage medium, which can effectively solve the problem of systemic deficiencies.

[0004] In a first aspect, this application provides an antenna sensitivity interference testing method, including: Line loss calibration is performed on the test equipment to obtain the line loss compensation for the test equipment; Based on the aforementioned line loss compensation, the radiation sensitivity of the antenna of the test equipment is tested to obtain the basic radiation sensitivity. After the test optical module is connected to the test equipment, the radiation sensitivity of the antenna of the test equipment is tested based on the line loss compensation to obtain the interference radiation sensitivity. Based on the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity, it is determined whether the antenna sensitivity of the test equipment is abnormal.

[0005] Secondly, this application provides an antenna sensitivity interference testing system, including: computer equipment, test optical module and test equipment; The computer equipment is used to calibrate the line loss of the test equipment and obtain the line loss compensation of the test equipment. The computer device performs a radiation sensitivity test on the antenna of the test device based on the line loss compensation to obtain the basic radiation sensitivity; after the test device is connected to the test optical module, the computer device performs a radiation sensitivity test on the antenna of the test device based on the line loss compensation to obtain the interference radiation sensitivity. The computer device determines whether the antenna sensitivity of the test equipment is abnormal based on the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity.

[0006] Thirdly, this application provides a computer device, the computer device including a processor and a memory, the memory storing a computer program, and the processor executing the computer program to implement the antenna sensitivity interference testing method described above.

[0007] Fourthly, this application provides a readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed on a processor, implements the antenna sensitivity interference testing method.

[0008] Fifthly, this application provides a computer program product, including computer-executable instructions or a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the antenna sensitivity interference testing method.

[0009] The embodiments of this application have the following beneficial effects: The antenna sensitivity interference testing method of this application embodiment can intuitively and accurately calculate the radiated interference caused by the test optical module by measuring the radiation sensitivity of the test equipment with and without the test optical module connected. In addition, combined with line loss compensation calibration, it ensures the accuracy of the radiated interference test results. This test scheme is simple to operate, has a low threshold, does not require complex testing equipment, has a standardized test process, is suitable for batch product testing, effectively screens optical modules with abnormal interference, improves the WiFi communication quality of wireless devices with optical modules, reduces the product defect rate, and provides an effective and standard antenna sensitivity interference testing method. Attached Figure Description

[0010] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application, the accompanying drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. It should be understood that the following drawings only show some embodiments of this application and should not be regarded as a limitation of the scope. For those skilled in the art, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0011] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the antenna sensitivity interference testing system architecture according to an embodiment of this application is shown; Figure 2This paper illustrates a schematic diagram of another antenna sensitivity interference testing system architecture according to an embodiment of the present application. Figure 3 A flowchart of an antenna sensitivity interference testing method according to an embodiment of this application is shown; Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of this application is shown. Detailed Implementation

[0012] The technical solutions in the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments.

[0013] The components of the embodiments of this application described and illustrated in the accompanying drawings can be arranged and designed in a variety of different configurations. Therefore, the following detailed description of the embodiments of this application provided in the drawings is not intended to limit the scope of the claimed application, but merely to illustrate selected embodiments of the application. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of this application without inventive effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0014] In the following text, the terms "comprising," "having," and their cognates, which may be used in various embodiments of this application, are intended only to indicate a particular feature, number, step, operation, element, component, or combination thereof, and should not be construed as primarily excluding the presence of one or more other features, numbers, steps, operations, elements, components, or combinations thereof, or adding the possibility of one or more combinations thereof. Furthermore, the terms "first," "second," "third," etc., are used only for distinguishing descriptions and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0015] Unless otherwise specified, all terms used herein (including technical and scientific terms) shall have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the various embodiments of this application pertain. Terms (such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries) shall be interpreted as having the same meaning as in their contextual meaning in the relevant technical field and shall not be construed as having an idealized or overly formal meaning, unless clearly defined in the various embodiments of this application.

[0016] The following detailed description of some embodiments of this application is provided in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Unless otherwise specified, the following embodiments and features can be combined with each other.

[0017] like Figure 1As shown, the antenna sensitivity interference testing system of this application embodiment includes: a first computer device 110, a second computer device 120, a testing device 200, a testing instrument 300, and a testing optical module 400.

[0018] The test device 200 can be a router, which includes at least three network ports. The first computer device 110 is connected to the wired network port 220 and the wireless network port 230 respectively, and the second computer device 120 is connected to the optical network port 210, thereby realizing the connection between the two computer devices and the test device 200.

[0019] The test instrument 300 is mainly used to read the test data from the test equipment and feed it back to the first computer device 110. The first computer device 110 is also connected to the test instrument 300 and can control and receive the data from the test instrument 300. The test instrument 300 can be a spectrum analyzer.

[0020] The test optical module 400 is connected to the test equipment 200 as an interference source. During the test, two comparative tests will be performed: one when the test optical module 400 and the test equipment 200 are connected, and another when the test optical module 400 and the test equipment 200 are not connected.

[0021] Before testing, the first and second computer devices will configure the IP addresses of their network ports. This primarily ensures that the wired network port 220 and the optical network port 210 share the same IP address segment, such as 192.168.1.X. The wireless network port 230, however, needs to have its IP address segment isolated from these two segments, such as being configured with an IP address of 192.168.100.X. The first computer device 110 can be considered the main entity executing the method of this application embodiment.

[0022] Both the first and second computer devices need to have automated testing software installed to perform automated testing during the test.

[0023] Subsequently, the first and second computer devices simultaneously run downlink streams to test the interference of the test optical module on the radiation sensitivity of the test equipment.

[0024] As an example, it will first follow Figure 2 Test the connection as shown, and then follow the instructions. Figure 1 The connection method was tested to complete the radiation sensitivity interference test.

[0025] The following describes the antenna sensitivity interference test method using specific examples.

[0026] Figure 3A flowchart of an antenna sensitivity interference testing method according to an embodiment of this application is shown. Exemplarily, the antenna sensitivity interference testing method includes the following steps: Step S100: Perform line loss calibration on the test equipment to obtain line loss compensation for the test equipment.

[0027] It is understandable that data transmission involves losses. When the signal transmitter sends a signal at a certain power, the signal received by the receiver will be attenuated due to line loss. Therefore, line loss needs to be calibrated during testing. However, the embodiments of this application mainly test the sensitivity of wireless WiFi, so what needs to be calibrated is the line loss of wireless WiFi.

[0028] When calibrating line loss, the signal transmitting equipment can be controlled to transmit power at its rated power to conduct input to each frequency band of the antenna of the test equipment in sequence.

[0029] The received power of each frequency band of the antenna of the test equipment is detected, and the radiation loss of each frequency band is calculated based on the received power and the rated transmit power. This radiation loss can be used as a line loss compensation in subsequent tests to compensate for the output power of the signal transmitting end during the test.

[0030] The calibration can be performed using an automated script. During calibration, all frequency bands of the antenna, such as 2.4G, 5G, and 6G, will be calibrated. For example, the calibration process mainly involves connecting a signal transmitter to the test equipment and then transmitting signals according to the frequency ranges of the aforementioned frequency bands.

[0031] During calibration, first set the frequency band. Taking the 2412 frequency band as an example, set the signal transmission power of the signal transmitter, such as -10dB. Then detect the signal power value received by the test equipment. If the received power value is -27dB, then the line loss of the 2412 frequency is -10-(-27)=17dB. Store the calibrated 17dB in the line loss table, and then proceed to the next frequency band for calibration. In this way, the line loss step size of multiple frequency bands can be obtained.

[0032] For example, the automated script executes the 36th channel of MCS13 mode (corresponding frequency 5180) under 5G 11BE mode 20M bandwidth, with the frequency increasing by 20, until the loop ends under the 165th channel of MCS13 mode (corresponding frequency 5825) under 5G 11BE mode 20M bandwidth, at which point the line loss calibration of the 5G band is completed.

[0033] As an example, the starting and ending frequencies of the 2.4G band are 2.3G-2.6G Hz.

[0034] 5G band start and end frequencies: 4.95G-6.25G Hz.

[0035] The starting and ending frequencies of the 6G band are 5.7 GHz to 7.3 GHz.

[0036] By setting the start and end frequencies of the scan, it is possible to scan the three frequency bands of Wi-Fi: 2.4G, 5G, and 6G.

[0037] This process can be repeated for all frequency bands.

[0038] Step S200: Based on the line loss compensation, perform a radiation sensitivity test on the antenna of the test equipment to obtain the basic radiation sensitivity.

[0039] The calibrated line loss step size will be used in subsequent radiation sensitivity tests, whereby it is first set according to... Figure 2 The connection method will be tested. During the test, based on line loss compensation, both the first and second computer devices will be controlled to simultaneously run downlink traffic at their rated transmission power. The test device must be set to bridge mode, not routing mode.

[0040] It should be noted that the downlink streaming here is mainly to maintain data communication between the first and second computer devices. As long as these two devices can communicate, it simulates a normal daily usage scenario. Here, the second computer device can be considered to represent various communication terminals on the World Wide Web, while the first computer device represents communication terminals such as personal computers.

[0041] Furthermore, in this embodiment of the application, both computer devices perform downlink streaming but not uplink streaming. This is because uplink streaming has virtually no impact on the radiation receiving sensitivity. Since this embodiment tests the interference of Wi-Fi receiving sensitivity, downlink streaming is performed on both devices to better measure the fluctuations and changes in sensitivity, thereby measuring the interference caused by the optical module.

[0042] It is understandable that if uplink and downlink are tested simultaneously, the effect is not as good as running downlink traffic only, because wireless streaming is in half-duplex mode. Simultaneous uplink and downlink testing only involves switching back and forth between uplink and downlink. Therefore, since uplink testing is less effective than downlink testing, there is naturally no need to test uplink and downlink simultaneously. Thus, this application embodiment only needs to test downlink streaming.

[0043] Then, the transmission power of the first computer device and the second computer device will be gradually reduced until the packet loss rate of the test device exceeds the preset packet loss rate, and the corresponding transmission power will be recorded.

[0044] Before testing, the first and second computer devices will be configured with IP addresses for their network ports. The main goal is to ensure that the wired network port 220 and the optical network port 210 have the same IP address segment, such as 192, 168, 1, X. The wireless network port 230 needs to be isolated from these two segments, such as being configured with an IP address of 192, 168, 100, X.

[0045] It's understandable that two computer devices that need to communicate are set to the same network segment to ensure direct communication between them, and this segment is separated from the wireless network segment, creating isolation on the link and effectively eliminating most environmental interference. The sensitivity measured in this way reflects the sensitivity inherent in the device's hardware performance.

[0046] The packet loss rate is recorded in real time by the test instrument and fed back to the first computer device. When the packet loss rate exceeds the preset packet loss rate, the streaming can be stopped. At this time, the obtained transmission power is the radiation sensitivity result of this test.

[0047] For example, if the preset packet loss rate is set to 10%, and the initial power of the stream is -70dB, the packet loss rate is less than 10%. Then, it is gradually reduced until it reaches -92dB, at which point the packet loss rate is greater than 10%. In this case, -92dB is the radiation sensitivity result of this test.

[0048] The radiative sensitivity test requires testing all frequency bands. Therefore, after testing one frequency band, the testing instrument switches to the monitoring band and repeats the above-mentioned flow running process to complete all evaluation tests and obtain the radiative sensitivity results for all frequency bands. The radiative sensitivity result obtained at this point is the basic radiative sensitivity. This result was obtained under conditions of no optical module interference.

[0049] In one feasible embodiment, before testing, all radio frequency signal related modules of the test equipment need to be turned off and the radio frequency link of the test equipment needs to be disconnected.

[0050] The above tests must be conducted in a shielded room to isolate them from other external interference.

[0051] Step S300: After the test optical module is connected to the test equipment, the radiation sensitivity of the antenna of the test equipment is tested based on the line loss compensation to obtain the interference radiation sensitivity.

[0052] According to the equipment Figure 1 After connecting in this way, test again. The test method is the same as step S200, and will not be repeated here.

[0053] The same test covers all frequency bands, but according to... Figure 1During the connection test, the radiation sensitivity obtained is the sensitivity result obtained after the test equipment is affected by the test optical module. Due to the high-speed modulation and nonlinear components inside the optical module, signal distortion, increased bit error rate, and even interference with other equipment may occur. Therefore, the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity obtained in this test and the basic radiation sensitivity in the aforementioned step S200 is caused by the test optical module.

[0054] Step S400: Determine whether the antenna sensitivity of the test equipment is abnormal based on the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity.

[0055] After obtaining the interference radiation sensitivity, the interference difference value can be obtained by subtracting the interference radiation sensitivity from the basic radiation sensitivity. This interference difference value represents the degree of interference of the optical module to the antenna sensitivity of the test equipment. If the interference is greater than the preset value, it means that the interference of the optical module to the test equipment is too large and the interference situation is abnormal.

[0056] As an example, the preset value can be 2dB, 3dB, etc.

[0057] Taking 3dB as an example, when sensitivity deteriorates by 3dB (equivalent to a 3dB decrease in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the channel capacity C will be halved. The actual impact manifests as an exponential increase in the bit error rate (BER) (e.g., BER increases from 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻² under QPSK modulation) and a reduction in effective communication distance by approximately 30% (free-space path loss model). Therefore, it is evident that when interference reaches 3dB, it will significantly impact the user experience. Thus, a preset value of 3dB can be used to determine if interference is abnormal. Alternatively, a more stringent setting, such as 2dB, can be used. The specific preset value can be determined based on the actual product positioning and hardware performance of the test equipment. The 3dB degradation point can be quickly captured using standard equipment (such as a vector signal analyzer), while more stringent standards (such as 1dB) will significantly increase testing costs and time.

[0058] If an anomaly is found, it indicates that the test equipment is susceptible to the influence of the optical module and needs to be repaired or improved to find the problem. If no anomaly is found, it indicates that the test equipment is configured correctly.

[0059] The antenna sensitivity interference test in this application embodiment ensures accurate line loss calibration during testing, improving work efficiency. Unlike traditional tests that often ignore the coupling relationship between the flow direction and the RF interference mechanism and frequently use uplink / bidirectional flow, resulting in interference signals failing to effectively excite the nonlinear response of the Wi-Fi receiving link, this invention clarifies and verifies for the first time that only downlink (RX direction) flow perturbation can truly reproduce the dynamic interference process of optical module transmit harmonics / switching noise on the Wi-Fi receiving front-end LNA and mixer. This significantly improves the accuracy and comparability of SFP optical module's assessment of Wi-Fi radiated receiver sensitivity interference. Furthermore, the entire testing process is highly automated, greatly improving testing efficiency.

[0060] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a computer device 500 according to an embodiment of this application is shown. Exemplarily, the computer device 500 includes: at least one processor 510, a memory 550, at least one network interface 520, and a user interface 530. The various components in the computer device 500 are coupled together via a bus system 540. It is understood that the bus system 540 is used to implement communication between these components. In addition to a data bus, the bus system 540 also includes a power bus, a control bus, and a status signal bus. However, for clarity, ... Figure 4 All buses are designated as bus system 540. The aforementioned computer equipment may be a server for carrying the IoT platform of this application, or a computer device capable of running the IoT platform.

[0061] The processor 510 can be an integrated circuit chip with signal processing capabilities, such as a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. The general-purpose processor can be a microprocessor or any conventional processor, etc.

[0062] User interface 530 includes one or more output devices 531 that enable the presentation of media content, including one or more speakers and / or one or more visual displays. User interface 530 also includes one or more input devices 532, including user interface components that facilitate user input, such as a keyboard, mouse, microphone, touch screen display, camera, other input buttons and controls.

[0063] The memory 550 may be removable, non-removable, or a combination thereof. Exemplary hardware devices include solid-state storage, hard disk drives, optical disk drives, etc. The memory 550 may optionally include one or more storage devices physically located away from the processor 510.

[0064] The memory 550 may include volatile memory or non-volatile memory, or both. The non-volatile memory may be read-only memory (ROM), and the volatile memory may be random access memory (RAM). The memory 550 described in this application embodiment is intended to include any suitable type of memory.

[0065] In some embodiments, memory 550 is capable of storing data to support various operations, examples of which include programs, modules, and data structures or subsets or supersets thereof, as illustrated below.

[0066] Operating system 551 includes system programs for handling various basic system services and performing hardware-related tasks, such as the framework layer, core library layer, driver layer, etc., for implementing various basic business functions and handling hardware-based tasks; The network communication module 552 is used to reach other electronic devices via one or more (wired or wireless) network interfaces 520, exemplary network interfaces 520 including: Bluetooth, WiFi, and Universal Serial Bus (USB), etc. Presentation module 553 is used to enable the presentation of information (e.g., user interface for operating peripheral devices and displaying content and information) via one or more output devices 531 (e.g., display screen, speaker, etc.) associated with user interface 530. The input processing module 554 is used to detect and translate one or more user inputs or interactions from one or more input devices 532.

[0067] It is understood that the apparatus in this embodiment corresponds to the antenna sensitivity interference testing method in the above embodiment, and the options in the above embodiment are also applicable to this embodiment, so they will not be described again here.

[0068] This application also provides a computer device, exemplary of which includes a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor executes the computer program to enable the computer device to perform the functions of the various modules in the above-described antenna sensitivity interference testing method or the above-described antenna sensitivity interference testing apparatus.

[0069] The processor can be an integrated circuit chip with signal processing capabilities. The processor can be a general-purpose processor, including at least one of a Central Processing Unit (CPU), Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), Network Processor (NP), Digital Signal Processor (DSP), Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, or discrete hardware components. The general-purpose processor can be a microprocessor or any conventional processor, capable of implementing or executing the methods, steps, and logic block diagrams disclosed in the embodiments of this application.

[0070] The memory can be, but is not limited to, Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Programmable Read-Only Memory (PROM), Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), etc. The memory is used to store computer programs, and the processor can execute the computer programs accordingly after receiving execution instructions.

[0071] This application also provides a readable storage medium for storing the computer program used in the aforementioned computer device.

[0072] This application provides a computer program product, including computer-executable instructions or a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the antenna sensitivity interference testing method.

[0073] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and methods can also be implemented in other ways. The apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For example, the flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings show the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of apparatus, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of this application. In this regard, each block in a flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, segment, or portion of code containing one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that, in alternative implementations, the functions marked in the blocks may occur in a different order than those marked in the drawings. For example, two consecutive blocks may actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they may sometimes be executed in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagram and / or flowchart, and combinations of blocks in the block diagram and / or flowchart, can be implemented using a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or action, or using a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0074] In addition, the functional modules or units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated together to form an independent part, or each module can exist independently, or two or more modules can be integrated to form an independent part.

[0075] If the aforementioned functions are implemented as software functional modules and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or a portion of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a smartphone, personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0076] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of this application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technology disclosed in this application should be included within the scope of protection of this application.

Claims

1. A method for testing antenna sensitivity interference, characterized in that, include: Line loss calibration is performed on the test equipment to obtain the line loss compensation for the test equipment; Based on the aforementioned line loss compensation, the radiation sensitivity of the antenna of the test equipment is tested to obtain the basic radiation sensitivity. After the test optical module is connected to the test equipment, the radiation sensitivity of the antenna of the test equipment is tested based on the line loss compensation to obtain the interference radiation sensitivity. Based on the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity, it is determined whether the antenna sensitivity of the test equipment is abnormal.

2. The antenna sensitivity interference testing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of calibrating the test equipment for line loss to obtain line loss compensation for the test equipment includes: The control signal transmitting device transmits signals sequentially to each frequency band of the antenna of the test device at its rated transmission power. The received power of each frequency band of the antenna of the test equipment is detected, and the radiation loss of each frequency band is calculated based on the received power and the rated transmit power.

3. The antenna sensitivity interference testing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The testing device is connected to both a first computer device and a second computer device; the first computer device is connected to the first network port of the testing device, and the second computer device is connected to the second network port of the testing device. The step of performing radiation sensitivity testing on the antenna of the test equipment based on the line loss compensation includes: Based on the aforementioned line loss compensation, the first computer device and the second computer device are controlled to simultaneously run downlink data at the rated transmission power. The transmission power of the first computer device and the second computer device is gradually reduced until the packet loss rate of the test device exceeds the preset packet loss rate, and the corresponding transmission power is recorded. Based on the emission power, the radiation sensitivity results of this test were obtained.

4. The antenna sensitivity interference testing method according to claim 3, characterized in that, The first network port includes a wireless network port and a wired network port; The first computer device is directly connected to the wired network port, and is also connected to the wireless network port through a testing instrument; The detection instrument detects the packet loss rate of the test device in real time through the wireless network port and feeds back the packet loss rate to the first computer device.

5. The antenna sensitivity interference testing method according to claim 2, characterized in that, Before performing the radiation sensitivity test, the testing equipment also includes: Turn off all RF signal related modules of the test equipment and disconnect the RF link of the test equipment.

6. The antenna sensitivity interference testing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of determining whether the antenna sensitivity of the test equipment is abnormal based on the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity includes: If the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity is greater than a preset value, then it is determined that the sensitivity interference of the test optical module to the test equipment is abnormal.

7. An antenna sensitivity interference testing system, characterized in that, include: Computer equipment, test optical modules, and test equipment; The computer equipment is used to calibrate the line loss of the test equipment and obtain the line loss compensation of the test equipment. The computer device performs radiation sensitivity testing on the antenna of the test device based on the line loss compensation to obtain the basic radiation sensitivity; After the test optical module is connected to the test equipment, the radiation sensitivity of the antenna of the test equipment is tested based on the line loss compensation to obtain the interference radiation sensitivity. The computer device determines whether the antenna sensitivity of the test equipment is abnormal based on the difference between the interference radiation sensitivity and the basic radiation sensitivity.

8. A computer device, characterized in that, The computer device includes a processor and a memory, the memory storing a computer program, and the processor executing the computer program to implement the antenna sensitivity interference test method according to any one of claims 1-6.

9. A readable storage medium, characterized in that, It stores a computer program, which, when executed on a processor, implements the antenna sensitivity interference test method according to any one of claims 1-6.

10. A computer program product comprising computer-executable instructions or a computer program, characterized in that, When the computer-executable instructions or computer program are executed by a processor, the antenna sensitivity interference test method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

Images