Project process research and development quality management evaluation method, device, equipment and medium

Abstract

This invention belongs to the field of quality management assessment technology, and discloses a method, apparatus, equipment, and medium for quality management assessment of project process improvement. The method includes: acquiring the target project and extracting its benefit indicators; determining the expected benefits of the benefit indicators; acquiring the implementation plan for the target project and constructing a set of implementation plans based on the implementation plans; recording implementation records and determining the implementation benefits based on the implementation records; generating a project outcome report after the implementation benefits reach the expected benefits, and reviewing the project outcome report; generating a promotion plan for the target project after the review is passed, the promotion plan being used to promote and publish the target project; acquiring the promotion feedback results of the target project, evaluating the promotion feedback results for leadership, and generating a project leadership document after the promotion feedback results have passed the leadership evaluation. This invention can improve the quality and efficiency of the review process.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the field of quality management assessment technology, specifically relating to a quality management assessment method, apparatus, equipment, and medium for project process improvement. Background Technology

[0002] A QC (Quality Control) group is a group of employees who voluntarily form a team to improve quality, reduce consumption, improve the environment, enhance human resources and economic efficiency, and conduct activities based on quality management theories and methods. This team is organized around the company's business strategy, policies and objectives and the problems existing on site.

[0003] Existing QC groups face the following problems when participating in quality management: 1. Quality management data is collected and statistically analyzed manually by members of the QC team, resulting in low data collection efficiency; 2. The management process of the QC group is prone to being reversed, leading to inaccurate quality management review results; 3. The limited range of quality management review methods reduces the overall quality of quality management reviews. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of this invention is to provide a quality management assessment method, apparatus, equipment, and medium for project process improvement, in order to solve the problems of inaccurate quality management review results and low review quality in the prior art.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention adopts the following technical solution: In a first aspect, the present invention provides a quality management assessment method for tackling key problems in project processes, the method comprising: Identify the target projects and extract their benefit indicators; Conduct feasibility analysis on the target projects and determine the expected benefits of the benefit indicators; Obtain the measures and plans for the target projects, construct a set of measures and plans based on the measures and plans for the target projects, and select the best plan and consensus measures from the set of measures and plans; Record the implementation of the best solutions and consensus-based problem-solving measures during the implementation period, and determine the implementation benefits based on the implementation records; After the expected benefits are achieved, a results report of the target project is generated and reviewed. After the review is approved, a promotion plan for the target project is generated, which is used to promote and publish the target project. Obtain the promotion feedback results of the target key projects, conduct a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, and generate project leading documents after the leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results is passed; Obtain project lead documents, generate project implementation release information based on project lead documents, and release and implement the project implementation release information through an implementation release device.

[0006] Preferably, the promotion plan includes: a paper publication plan and a results exchange plan.

[0007] Preferably, when the implementation benefits achieve the expected benefits, the method further includes: Based on the best solutions and consensus-based problem-solving measures, an execution template document for the target problem-solving project is generated. The target problem-solving project includes multiple topics, and the execution template document includes multiple sub-files, with each topic corresponding to at least one sub-file. Identify the client responsible for each sub-project of the target research project, and send at least one sub-file of each sub-project to the client responsible for that sub-project.

[0008] Preferably, the method further includes: Construct an outcome database, a file database, and a document database. The outcome database is used to store the outcome reports of the target key projects, the document database is used to store the execution template documents, and the file database is used to store the project's leading documents.

[0009] Preferably, the method further includes: After the review is passed, an award for the achievement report is generated, which is used to represent the review level of the achievement report; the award for the achievement report includes: review pass award, excellent achievement award, third prize, second prize, first prize and special prize; The review awards for the results reports are stored in the results database.

[0010] Preferably, the results report includes: problem-solving QC results and innovative QC results.

[0011] Preferably, the method further includes: Construct a measures database, which is used to store measures plans; Extract keywords from the target projects, and search for related measures and plans based on the keywords. The retrieved measures and solutions related to the target project are structured and stored in the measures database.

[0012] Secondly, the present invention provides a quality management assessment device for project process improvement, used to implement the above-mentioned quality management assessment method for project process improvement, the device comprising: The project acquisition module is used to acquire target projects and extract benefit indicators from them. The project analysis module is used to conduct feasibility analysis on target projects and determine the expected benefits of benefit indicators. The measures screening module is used to obtain the measures and plans for the target projects, construct a set of measures and plans based on the measures and plans for the target projects, and screen out the best plan and consensus measures from the set of measures and plans. The benefit recording module is used to record the implementation of the best solutions and consensus-based problem-solving measures during the implementation period, and to determine the implementation benefits based on the implementation records. The results review module is used to generate a results report for the target project after the implementation benefits have reached the expected benefits, and to review the results report of the target project. The project promotion module is used to generate a promotion plan for the target project after the review is approved. The promotion plan is used to promote and publish the target project. The project evaluation module is used to obtain the promotion feedback results of the target key projects, conduct a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, and generate project leading documents after the leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results is passed. The implementation and release module is used to obtain the project's leading documents, generate project implementation and release information based on the project's leading documents, and release and implement the project implementation and release information through the implementation and release device.

[0013] Thirdly, the present invention provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the aforementioned quality management and assessment method for tackling project process challenges.

[0014] Fourthly, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described quality management and assessment method for tackling project process challenges.

[0015] Beneficial effects: 1. This invention improves data processing efficiency by automatically conducting feasibility analysis, screening of measures and solutions, reviewing and evaluating results for target research projects, which is conducive to quickly completing quality management assessments of target research projects and improving assessment efficiency. 2. This invention first reviews the results and then evaluates the leading results of the promotion feedback, which improves the quality of the review and is conducive to the formation of leading projects. Attached Figure Description

[0016] The accompanying drawings are provided to further illustrate embodiments of the present invention and form part of the specification. They are used together with the following detailed description to explain the embodiments of the present invention, but do not constitute a limitation thereof. In the drawings: Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges provided in one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the construction of a measures database according to one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of document database construction provided by one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the construction of a results database according to one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of file database construction provided by one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the release and implementation process provided by one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 7 This is a block diagram of a quality management and evaluation device for tackling project process challenges, provided in one embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0017] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the present invention will be briefly introduced below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and descriptions of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the following description of the structure of the accompanying drawings is only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort. It should be noted that the description of these embodiments is for the purpose of helping to understand the present invention, but does not constitute a limitation of the present invention.

[0018] Example 1 Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a quality management assessment method for tackling project process challenges provided by one embodiment of the present invention; the application scenarios of this method include: a server, a responsible client, and a superior client, both of which are connected to the server, and the responsible client is connected to the superior client.

[0019] Based on the above application scenarios, this embodiment provides a quality management and assessment method for tackling project process challenges, such as... Figure 1 As shown, the method includes: Step S10: Obtain the target projects and extract the benefit indicators of the target projects.

[0020] In this embodiment, the QC team collectively discusses the pressing problems that need to be solved, assigns a specific person to be responsible, determines the direction of the research, and analyzes the importance, necessity, economic benefits, technical benefits, social benefits, other benefits, and intangible benefits to identify the research projects. These identified projects are then designated as target research projects. Each QC team member enters the target research projects and their benefit indicators through their respective responsible client, while also annotating the benefit indicators. These indicators include: research target indicators, economic benefit indicators, technical benefit indicators, social benefit indicators, other benefit indicators, and intangible benefit indicators. The responsible client then uploads the target research projects and their benefit indicators to the server, where they are stored in the server's database.

[0021] Therefore, when it is necessary to conduct a review of a project, the relevant target projects can be directly retrieved from the database, and the benefit indicators of the target projects can be extracted.

[0022] Step S20: Conduct a feasibility analysis on the target project and determine the expected benefits of the benefit indicators.

[0023] In this embodiment, the expected effects of self-selected problem-solving projects are determined through a current situation survey and goal setting; or the expected effects of both mandatory and innovative problem-solving projects are determined through goal setting and feasibility analysis. Expected effects include the proposed project goals, economic benefits, technical benefits, social benefits, other benefits, and intangible benefits.

[0024] Step S30: Obtain the measures and plans for the target project, construct a set of measures and plans based on the measures and plans for the target project, and select the best plan and consensus measures from the set of measures and plans.

[0025] In this embodiment, the method further includes: Step a10: Construct a measures database, which is used to store measures plans; Step a20: Extract keywords for the target project, and search for related measures and plans based on the keywords of the target project; Step a30: Structure the queried measures and solutions associated with the target project, and store the structured measures and solutions associated with the target project in the measures database.

[0026] In this embodiment, a measures database is built on the server. The database searches the Internet for all measures and solutions related to the target project using keywords of the target project, and stores all measures and solutions in the database. When a relevant measures and solutions are needed, they are retrieved directly from the database.

[0027] When building a database of measures, such as Figure 2 As shown, the server has functional modules such as database categorization and annotation, table of contents creation, adding functional items, and editing search terms. Through a combination of "online search for measures" and "formulating countermeasures," practical consensus measures for this project are developed and compared with relevant measures stored in the measures database. "Measure 1 (used)" is deleted during formulation; "Measure 2 (unused)" is included; "Measure 3 (leading)" indicates that the document already exists; and "Measure 4 (obsolete)" indicates that the measure is outdated and needs to be removed from the measures database. All measures proposed during the process improvement activity are entered into the database, using either electronic documents or paper cards. Each measure is numbered sequentially and its category, content or function, and status (used, unused, leading, obsolete) are filled in.

[0028] When storing the measures and plans, either electronic documents or paper cards are acceptable. Each measure should be numbered sequentially and its category, content or function, status (currently used or not used, general) should be filled in.

[0029] In this embodiment, after extracting a certain number of proposed measures from the measures database, draft and compile measures and plans. As needed, the draft measures are combined with cause analysis, key factor confirmation, and countermeasure formulation to form consensus-based problem-solving measures; or the draft plans are combined with various proposed plans, the optimal plan is determined, and a countermeasure table is created to form consensus-based problem-solving measures. The next step is the implementation process, i.e., the execution process of the consensus-based measures or plans.

[0030] The "problem-solving" process is lengthy, involving continuous problem-solving and selection of measures (solutions). Measures already in the database are deleted or modified when formulating countermeasures, while measures not in the database are incorporated into the countermeasures, keeping the status of new measures in place. It is crucial to prevent the omission of measures (solutions) of high value or effectiveness, while also ensuring that all end-cause factors are exhausted, measures are formulated effectively, and plans are implemented thoroughly. The goal is to achieve 100% of measures (solutions) being tested and evaluated to reach a final judgment, thus enabling a leading position.

[0031] Step S40: Record the implementation of the best solution and consensus-based problem-solving measures within the implementation period, and determine the implementation benefits based on the implementation records.

[0032] In this embodiment, by statistically calculating relevant data, the completion status of the target value of the key project is confirmed, as well as the completion effect of economic benefits, technical benefits, social benefits, other benefits, and intangible benefits. Next, it is checked whether there is an effect or no effect. If there is no effect (i.e. the implementation benefits have not reached the expected benefits), the process returns to step S10 and is repeated. If there is an effect (i.e. the implementation benefits have reached the expected benefits), the process proceeds to step S50. The effect is confirmed according to its magnitude, and the strength of the target completion is analyzed to achieve the goal of leading or close to leading.

[0033] In this embodiment, when the implementation benefits achieve the expected benefits, the method further includes: Step b10: Based on the best solution and consensus-based problem-solving measures, generate an execution template document for the target problem-solving project. The target problem-solving project includes multiple topics, and the execution template document includes multiple sub-files, with each topic corresponding to at least one sub-file. Step b20: Determine the client responsible for each sub-project of the target project, and send at least one sub-file of each sub-project to the client responsible for that sub-project.

[0034] In this embodiment, a document database is also built on the server. This database stores execution template documents, which are files without document numbers. These files can be implemented at various positions (i.e., sub-files are sent to the corresponding responsible person's client to complete the implementation of the files at each position) and are included in the document database. In this embodiment, either electronic documents or paper cards can be used. Each file without a document number is sequentially numbered and its category, content or function, and status (currently in use, general) are filled in.

[0035] Specifically, when building a document database on a server, such as Figure 3 As shown, the server has functional modules such as "Create files without document numbers", "Create product technical manuals", "Belong to", "Create table of contents", "Edit search page", and "Maintenance group".

[0036] At the same time, prepare project introductions or product manuals, and if a consolidation period test is required, conduct a consolidation period effect test; otherwise, proceed to step S50.

[0037] Step S50: After the implementation benefits have reached the expected benefits, generate the results report of the target project and review the results report of the target project.

[0038] In this embodiment, the results report is divided into two categories: problem-solving (on-site, tackling key challenges, service, management) QC results and innovative QC results. Additionally, science and technology, work, and life-related results can also be generated according to the QC results report generation method. After generating the results report for the target project, the responsible client uploads the report to the superior client. The reports are reviewed simultaneously on both the responsible client and the superior client; those that pass the review proceed to step S60.

[0039] As a further optimization of this embodiment, the server in this embodiment has a results database, such as... Figure 4As shown, the results database is used to store the results reports of the target research projects. In this embodiment, the results reports of the target research projects are generated by the superior client, and then uploaded to the server by the superior client and stored in the results database on the server. In this embodiment, each result is numbered sequentially, and the name of the evaluation meeting, the project name, and the award information are filled in.

[0040] As a further optimization of this embodiment, the method further includes: Step c01: After the review is passed, the review award for the achievement report is generated. The review award for the achievement report is used to represent the review level of the achievement report. The review award for the achievement report includes: review pass award, excellent achievement award, third prize, second prize, first prize and special prize. Step c02: Store the review awards for the results report in the results database.

[0041] In this embodiment, the superior client generates the review award for the achievement report, and at the same time, the superior client uploads the review award for the achievement report to the server and stores it in the server's achievement database.

[0042] Step S60: After the review is approved, a promotion plan for the target project is generated, which is used to promote and publish the target project.

[0043] In this embodiment, projects that have passed the review continue to be implemented—the reviewed and approved results continue to be implemented in various departments and positions for a period of time, while the effectiveness is checked and confirmed at the same time.

[0044] In this embodiment, the promotion plan includes: a paper publication plan and a results exchange plan. Results exchange and promotion serve as the starting point of the evaluation process, developing a plan to utilize various forms of exchange to promote the applicability of the project, including the exchange and promotion of results. Simultaneously, the project's effectiveness analysis paper is submitted for publication in newspapers and periodicals to expand the project's influence, and is archived as an appendix to the team's activity record book.

[0045] Step S70: Obtain the promotion feedback results of the target project, conduct a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, and generate the project leading document after the leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results is passed.

[0046] In this embodiment, each enterprise is asked whether it applies the project through telephone, letter confirmation, and other means. If an enterprise needs the project, it can send the project information, project introduction, or product manual at the same time, which can be counted as one acceptance. If an enterprise has its own innovation project or product, it will not accept the project, which can be counted as one resistance. If the number of acceptances reaches a certain percentage, it can be regarded as the project application verification has passed, and feedback can be reported to the superior.

[0047] In this embodiment, the implementation status of the project in various units is statistically analyzed through online queries, telephone inquiries and exchanges, or acceptance reviews, and the coverage rate of the project application area is calculated. If the coverage rate of the enterprise unit that accepts the project reaches more than 90% or is recognized by the superior, the project is considered to be leading or has reached the leading standard range. At this time, the leading project document is generated. Otherwise, the process returns to step S60 to continue the promotion of results exchange.

[0048] For leading projects, a process of revising, supplementing, establishing, and abolishing documents is conducted to create new documents with document numbers, which are then incorporated into the document database. Simultaneously, the project's progress log is published online or submitted to the designated platform, along with complete supporting materials (including review and evaluation documents). Furthermore, the reporting and publication times are statistically analyzed to facilitate ranking. In this embodiment, a document database is also constructed, such as... Figure 5 As shown, the document database is used to store leading project documents. For technology (improvement) projects that have been assessed as leading or meeting standards, all documents with document numbers generated according to the construction, repair, and abandonment process are entered into the database. Electronic documents or paper cards can be used. Each leading official document with a document number is numbered sequentially and its category, content or function, and status (leading or meeting leading standards) are filled in. Documents with document numbers are categorized into national, ministerial, enterprise, group company, company, and workshop levels, with different document levels reflecting the scope of project application and promotion.

[0049] Step S80: Obtain the project lead document, generate project implementation release information based on the project lead document, and release and implement the project implementation release information through the implementation release device.

[0050] like Figure 6 As shown, project implementation information can be released through announcements on official websites, news articles in official media, videos and images on social media, or implementation information (with document numbers) sent from the server to the project leader's client. The project leader executes the project based on the implementation information received on the user's terminal. The implementation task is considered complete once all relevant personnel have received the relevant implementation information. Simultaneously, the execution results in each region are recorded, including project settlement, project team revenue, and obtaining registration qualifications for new projects.

[0051] This invention improves data processing efficiency by automatically conducting feasibility analysis, screening of measures and solutions, reviewing and evaluating results for target research projects. This facilitates the rapid completion of quality management assessments of target research projects and improves evaluation efficiency. Secondly, this invention reviews the results first and then conducts a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, which improves the quality of the review and helps to form leading projects.

[0052] Example 2 Figure 7 This is a block diagram of a quality management and assessment device for project process improvement provided in one embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 7 As shown, this embodiment provides a quality management and evaluation device for project process improvement, used to implement the quality management and evaluation method for project process improvement in Embodiment 1. The device includes: The project acquisition module is used to acquire target projects and extract benefit indicators from them. The project analysis module is used to conduct feasibility analysis on target projects and determine the expected benefits of benefit indicators. The measures screening module is used to obtain the measures and plans for the target projects, construct a set of measures and plans based on the measures and plans for the target projects, and screen out the best plan and consensus measures from the set of measures and plans. The benefit recording module is used to record the implementation of the best solutions and consensus-based problem-solving measures during the implementation period, and to determine the implementation benefits based on the implementation records. The results review module is used to generate a results report for the target project after the implementation benefits have reached the expected benefits, and to review the results report of the target project. The project promotion module is used to generate a promotion plan for the target project after the review is approved. The promotion plan is used to promote and publish the target project. The project evaluation module is used to obtain the promotion feedback results of the target key projects, conduct a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, and generate project leading documents after the leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results is passed. The implementation and release module is used to obtain the project's leading documents, generate project implementation and release information based on the project's leading documents, and release and implement the project implementation and release information through the implementation and release device.

[0053] This embodiment also provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the computer program, it implements the quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges as described in Embodiment 1.

[0054] This embodiment also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges in Embodiment 1.

[0055] This invention improves data processing efficiency by automatically conducting feasibility analysis, screening of measures and solutions, reviewing and evaluating results for target research projects. This facilitates the rapid completion of quality management assessments of target research projects and improves evaluation efficiency. Secondly, this invention reviews the results first and then conducts a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, which improves the quality of the review and helps to form leading projects.

[0056] Those skilled in the art will understand that embodiments of this application can be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, this application can take the form of a completely hardware embodiment, a completely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, this application can take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0057] This application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of this application. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special-purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, generate instructions for implementing the flowchart... Figure 1 One or more processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in one or more boxes.

[0058] The above are merely embodiments of this application and are not intended to limit the scope of this application. Various modifications and variations can be made to this application by those skilled in the art. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of this application should be included within the scope of the claims of this application.

Claims

1. A quality management assessment method for tackling key challenges in project processes, characterized in that, The method includes: Identify the target projects and extract their benefit indicators; Conduct feasibility analysis on the target projects and determine the expected benefits of the benefit indicators; Obtain the measures and plans for the target projects, construct a set of measures and plans based on the measures and plans for the target projects, and select the best plan and consensus measures from the set of measures and plans; Record the implementation of the best solutions and consensus-based problem-solving measures during the implementation period, and determine the implementation benefits based on the implementation records; After the expected benefits are achieved, a results report of the target project is generated and reviewed. After the review is approved, a promotion plan for the target project is generated, which is used to promote and publish the target project. Obtain the promotion feedback results of the target key projects, conduct a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, and generate project leading documents after the leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results is passed; Obtain project lead documents, generate project implementation release information based on project lead documents, and release and implement the project implementation release information through an implementation release device.

2. The quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges according to claim 1, characterized in that, The promotion plan includes: a paper publication plan and a results exchange plan.

3. The quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges according to claim 1, characterized in that, When the implementation benefits achieve the expected benefits, the method further includes: Based on the best solutions and consensus-based problem-solving measures, an execution template document for the target problem-solving project is generated. The target problem-solving project includes multiple topics, and the execution template document includes multiple sub-files, with each topic corresponding to at least one sub-file. Identify the client responsible for each sub-project of the target research project, and send at least one sub-file of each sub-project to the client responsible for that sub-project.

4. The quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Construct an outcome database, a file database, and a document database. The outcome database is used to store the outcome reports of the target key projects, the document database is used to store the execution template documents, and the file database is used to store the project's leading documents.

5. The quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges according to claim 4, characterized in that, The method further includes: After the review is passed, an award for the achievement report is generated, which is used to represent the review level of the achievement report; the award for the achievement report includes: review pass award, excellent achievement award, third prize, second prize, first prize and special prize; The review awards for the results reports are stored in the results database.

6. The quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges according to claim 4 or 5, characterized in that, The results report includes: problem-solving QC results and innovative QC results.

7. The quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Construct a measures database, which is used to store measures plans; Extract keywords from the target projects, and search for related measures and plans based on the keywords. The retrieved measures and solutions related to the target project are structured and stored in the measures database.

8. A quality management and evaluation device for project process improvement, used to implement the quality management and evaluation method for project process improvement as described in any one of claims 1-7, characterized in that, The device includes: The project acquisition module is used to acquire target projects and extract benefit indicators from them. The project analysis module is used to conduct feasibility analysis on target projects and determine the expected benefits of benefit indicators. The measures screening module is used to obtain the measures and plans for the target projects, construct a set of measures and plans based on the measures and plans for the target projects, and screen out the best plan and consensus measures from the set of measures and plans. The benefit recording module is used to record the implementation of the best solutions and consensus-based problem-solving measures during the implementation period, and to determine the implementation benefits based on the implementation records. The results review module is used to generate a results report for the target project after the implementation benefits have reached the expected benefits, and to review the results report of the target project. The project promotion module is used to generate a promotion plan for the target project after the review is approved. The promotion plan is used to promote and publish the target project. The project evaluation module is used to obtain the promotion feedback results of the target key projects, conduct a leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results, and generate project leading documents after the leading evaluation of the promotion feedback results is passed. The implementation and release module is used to obtain the project's leading documents, generate project implementation and release information based on the project's leading documents, and release and implement the project implementation and release information through the implementation and release device.

9. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that, When the processor executes the computer program, it implements the quality management and evaluation method for tackling project process challenges as described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When executed by the processor, the program implements the quality management assessment method for tackling project process challenges as described in any one of claims 1-7.

Images