A whole life cycle-oriented active health goal quantification management evaluation system

Abstract

The application discloses a kind of active health goal quantification management evaluation systems for whole life cycle, belong to health management technical field.The system is with body composition detection as core, through calculating based on height body composition index, combine flexibility, cardiopulmonary endurance, grip strength, muscle endurance four physical fitness indexes measured or calculated results, with percentage quantization evaluation health condition.With the best body composition state of 20-30 years old of subject as ideal health standard, it is suitable for 3 years old or above whole life cycle population.System uses bioelectrical impedance method to detect body composition, calculate cardiopulmonary endurance and muscle endurance through specific formula, avoid the risk of limit test in traditional physical detection.The application solves the existing health management passive lag, target fuzzy, data incomparable, low safety and other problems, realizes individualization, precision, whole cycle active health management, provides quantization basis for diet, exercise intervention and clinical diagnosis.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the field of health management technology, and specifically relates to a proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle. Background Technology

[0002] Society's demand for health management is becoming increasingly urgent, but the existing health management model still has many fundamental flaws and is unable to meet the public's core demand for "proactive health".

[0003] First, mainstream health management relies excessively on clinical medical examinations. These examinations are essentially disease screening and prevention, representing a typical passive health management model. Their core logic is to intervene after disease has occurred or sub-health symptoms have appeared, exhibiting a significant lag. For example, routine examinations can only detect when indicators such as blood sugar and blood pressure have exceeded clinical thresholds, but they cannot identify potential imbalances in body composition (such as a hidden decline in muscle mass or a slow increase in body fat percentage) before these indicators become abnormal, let alone provide forward-looking guidance on "how to achieve the ideal state of the body." This model equates "no disease" with "health," ignoring the fact that health is a continuous spectrum from low to high, leaving a large population in a gray area of ​​"neither disease nor health" and unable to receive effective management.

[0004] Secondly, a core pain point in proactive health management lies in the lack of a clear definition and evaluation system for the "ideal health state." Among existing evaluation systems, the "National Physical Fitness Measurement Standards (2023 Revision)" is the most widely used reference, but its original design was for national-level physical fitness sampling surveys, not individual health management, and therefore has significant limitations. 1. Rigid age segmentation leads to incomparable data: The standard divides adults (20-59 years old) into 5-year age groups, and the elderly (60-79 years old) are also divided into 5-year segments with different scoring standards. For example, the same physical test data of a subject at age 25 and age 30 cannot be directly compared because the standards for the different age groups belong to different categories, resulting in the failure of long-term health trend monitoring; more seriously, the elderly over 80 years old are completely excluded from the scope of the test, and there is a lack of applicable evaluation standards.

[0005] 2. The testing process is cumbersome and its accuracy is greatly affected by human error: The complete physical fitness test includes 12 tests (adults) or 10 tests (elderly), taking 30-60 minutes. The test results are highly dependent on the subject's proper form of movement (such as whether the knees are bent during the sit-and-reach test and whether the force exerted during the vertical jump is standard) and level of cooperation (such as whether the subject exerts their full effort in the cardiopulmonary function test). In practice, it is difficult to guarantee data consistency.

[0006] 3. Some testing items pose safety risks: The cardiopulmonary function test uses a power bicycle limit test, which requires the subject to reach exhaustion, and may cause accidents for people at high risk of cardiovascular disease; the balance test poses a risk of falls for elderly people with osteoporosis, limiting the applicable population.

[0007] 4. Lack of individualized evaluation dimensions: The standard uses a uniform "pass / excellent" grading system for the entire group, without considering individual differences in body structure. For example, two subjects with significant differences in height, weight, and muscle mass may be classified as the same grade due to the same absolute grip strength value, even though their actual health needs are completely different.

[0008] Furthermore, existing health management practices commonly suffer from a "method-goal inversion" problem. Due to the lack of clear, ideal health goals, various health management measures (such as exercise prescriptions and nutritional interventions) are often simply piled up without being specific. For example, blindly recommending high-intensity exercise without assessing the subject's muscle mass and cardiorespiratory endurance may lead to sports injuries; generalizing the recommendation of "fat loss" without differentiating fat distribution may cause health damage to people with low body fat.

[0009] In summary, existing technologies cannot achieve proactive health management that is "aimed at an individual's ideal health state, based on accurate assessment, covers the entire life cycle, and is safe and convenient." A completely new quantitative management and assessment system is needed. Summary of the Invention

[0010] In view of this, the present invention provides a proactive health goal quantitative management and assessment system for the entire life cycle, in order to solve or alleviate one of the technical problems existing in the prior art, and at least provide a beneficial option.

[0011] The technical solution of this invention is implemented as follows: a proactive health goal quantitative management and assessment system for the whole life cycle, including a body composition detection module, a physical fitness assessment module, and a comprehensive scoring module; The body composition detection module is used to collect the subject's body composition data and calculate the body composition index based on height; The physical fitness assessment module is used to obtain four physical fitness indicators—flexibility, cardiorespiratory endurance, grip strength, and muscle endurance—through actual measurement or calculation based on body composition index. The comprehensive scoring module is used to calculate the total health score based on the body composition score and physical fitness score, and to quantitatively assess the health status on a percentage scale. The body composition index is calculated as follows: Furthermore, the ideal health standard is based on the theoretically optimal body composition state of the subjects when they are 20-30 years old, and the total health score is set at 100 points.

[0012] Preferably, the body composition detection module detects the following items: Body mass index, lean body mass index, bone mineral index, muscle index, skeletal muscle index, relative skeletal muscle index, limb and trunk muscle ratio, trunk muscle index, upper limb muscle index, lower limb muscle index, fat index, body fat percentage, limb and trunk fat ratio, protein index, water index, intracellular fluid index, extracellular fluid index, extracellular fluid ratio, whole body phase angle, basal metabolic rate. The standard values ​​and fluctuation ranges for each index in healthy individuals are as follows: Body Mass Index (BMI) 22.0±2 for men and 21.0±2 for women; The lean body mass index was 18.7±1 for men and 16.2±1 for women. Bone mineral index: 1.05±0.05 for men and 0.91±0.05 for women; Muscle mass index: 17.65±1.5 for men and 15.3±1 for women; The skeletal muscle index was 10.65±0.15 for men and 8.85±0.1 for women. The relative skeletal muscle index was 8.1±0.4 for men and 6.6±0.35 for women. The muscle mass ratio of the limbs and trunk was 1.0±0.05 for men and 0.95±0.05 for women. The trunk muscle index was 8.35±0.7 for men and 7.0±0.5 for women. Upper limb muscle index: 2.2±0.3 for men and 1.6±0.2 for women; The lower limb muscle index was 6.0±0.8 for men and 5.0±0.3 for women. Fat index: 3.3±0.8 for men and 4.8±1 for women; Body fat percentage: 15% ± 3% for men and 23% ± 3% for women; The ratio of body fat in the limbs and trunk was 1.1±0.1 for men and 1.26±0.1 for women. The protein index for men was 3.68±0.36, and for women it was 3.20±0.32. The water index for men was 13.75±1.38, and for women it was 11.90±1.19. Intracellular fluid index: 8.52±0.85 for males; 7.37±0.74 for females. The whole-body phase angle was 6.55±0.4 for males and 5.75±0.35 for females; the extracellular fluid ratio was 0.380±0.01.

[0013] Preferably, the body composition detection module is also used to perform stratified evaluation of various body composition indices, compare each index with the standard value of the corresponding gender, divide it into seven levels: significantly increased, relatively high, slightly high, normal, low, significantly low, and severely low, and output the evaluation conclusion. The stratification threshold for body mass index is: For males, the values ​​are as follows: significantly elevated ≥35.00, relatively high ≥30.00, slightly high ≥24.50, normal ≥21.00, low ≥19.50, significantly low ≥18.00, and severely low <18.00. For women, the values ​​are as follows: significantly higher ≥34.50, higher ≥29.50, slightly higher ≥23.50, normal ≥20.20, lower ≥18.50, significantly lower ≥17.00, and severely lower <17.00. The stratification threshold for extracellular fluid ratio is: Significantly elevated ≥0.410 (assessment conclusion: obvious edema), relatively high ≥0.400 (edema), slightly elevated ≥0.390 (mild edema), normal ≥0.370 (normal), low ≥0.360 (mild dehydration), significantly low ≥0.350 (mild dehydration), severely low <0.350 (dehydration).

[0014] Preferably, in the fitness assessment module, the flexibility score is detected by the sit-and-reach test, and the maximum value of the two tests is taken (unit: cm). The flexibility score = the detected value + 10, the total score is 30 points, and the value range is 0-30. The grip strength scoring method involves measuring the maximum grip strength of the dominant hand (unit: kg) using an electronic digital grip strength meter. The scoring formula is as follows:

[0015] Total score: 10 points, with a value range of 0-10.

[0016] Preferably, in the physical fitness assessment module, the cardiorespiratory endurance score is calculated by estimating the maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max). The calculation formula is as follows:

[0017] Wherein, heart rate reserve = 220 - age - resting heart rate, BMI is body mass index, and FFMI is fat-free body mass index; The formula for cardiorespiratory endurance scoring is:

[0018] The total score is 30 points, with a range of 0-30. If the score is greater than 30, it will be counted as 30 points.

[0019] Preferably, in the physical fitness assessment module, the muscle endurance score is achieved by calculating the plank support time, and the calculation formula is as follows:

[0020] BMI stands for Body Mass Index, and FFMI stands for Fat-Free Body Mass Index. The formula for scoring muscle endurance is:

[0021] The total score is 30 points, with a range of 0-30. If the score is greater than 30, it will be counted as 30 points.

[0022] Preferably, in the comprehensive scoring module, the body composition score is calculated as follows: The body composition percentage score output by the body composition analyzer is divided by 2 and converted to a 50-point scale. The physical fitness score is calculated as follows: The sum of the four scores—flexibility, cardiorespiratory endurance, grip strength, and muscular endurance—is divided by 2 and converted to a 50-point scale.

[0023] The total score is 100 points, and the health level classification standard is as follows: ≥90 points is excellent, ≥80 points is good, ≥70 points is good, ≥60 points is normal, ≥50 points is slightly poor, ≥40 points is poor, and <40 points is very poor.

[0024] Preferably, the system is applicable to people throughout their entire life cycle, including children aged 3 and above, adults aged 18-59, elderly people aged 60-79, and elderly people aged 80 and above. The assessment criteria for body composition index in adulthood are not affected by age, and the test data of the same subject can be directly compared and analyzed, supporting the establishment of a personal health yearbook.

[0025] Preferably, the body composition detection module uses bioelectrical impedance analysis for detection. Alternatively, dual-energy X-ray diffraction can also be used to detect body composition. In the fitness assessment module, cardiorespiratory endurance can be measured using the Cooper 12-minute run, smartwatch estimation, or direct testing methods, while muscular endurance can be measured using the plank exercise method. The measured results and the estimated results have the same validity.

[0026] Preferably, the evaluation results output by the system include: The stratified assessment results of various body composition indices, individual scores for flexibility / cardiorespiratory endurance / grip strength / muscle endurance, body composition score, physical fitness score, total health score, and health level; Based on the assessment results, targeted health conditioning suggestions can be generated, providing personalized intervention directions for specific abnormal items (such as low bone mineral index and significantly increased fat index), so as to achieve the goal of proactive health management.

[0027] The embodiments of the present invention have the following advantages due to the adoption of the above technical solutions: 1. Achieve quantifiable goals for proactive health: For the first time, the "theoretical optimal body composition state for ages 20-30" is used as a personalized ideal health standard, breaking through the limitation of existing standards that only focus on "no disease". This provides clear and quantifiable goals (out of 100) for health management, solving the industry pain point of "vague health management goals".

[0028] 2. High accuracy of personalized assessment: Body composition index (e.g., based on individual height) is calculated. This avoids the shortcomings of simply relying on body fat percentage and being influenced by body weight; the assessment criteria are strongly correlated with individual body structure, rather than using a uniform threshold for the group. For example, for subjects who are 160cm and 180cm tall, ideal weight, muscle mass and other benchmark values ​​are set according to their height, making the assessment more in line with the individual's actual situation.

[0029] 3. Significantly improved safety and convenience of testing: Body composition is detected using bioelectrical impedance analysis (completed within 10 minutes). Cardiorespiratory endurance and muscular endurance are estimated based on body composition data, avoiding high-risk items such as the power bicycle extreme test, vertical jump, and balance test in the "National Physical Fitness Measurement Standards". It is especially suitable for special groups such as people at high risk of cardiovascular disease and elderly people with osteoporosis. There are very few human interference factors in the testing process, and the data accuracy is high.

[0030] 4. Strong comparability of data throughout the entire life cycle: Breaking through the limitations of existing standards that divide data into 5-year segments and have no standards for those over 80 years old, the assessment standards after adulthood are based on a constant height. Data from previous tests of the same subject can be directly compared, supporting the establishment of a personal health yearbook and enabling long-term health trend tracking (such as the pattern of muscle mass changes with age and the evaluation of the effectiveness of intervention measures).

[0031] 5. Comprehensive assessment covering structure and function: It incorporates 22 body composition indicators (structural data) and 4 fitness indicators (functional data) to achieve an integrated assessment of "structure and function" through a total score of 100; it provides both an overall health level and the ability to pinpoint specific abnormalities (such as low bone mineral index or imbalance in the ratio of muscle mass in the limbs and trunk), providing a clear direction for precise intervention.

[0032] 6. Low application cost and easy to promote: The cost of the complete set of tests is less than 100 yuan, which is far lower than dual-energy X-ray detection; no professional athlete-level testing venues and personnel are required, and community medical institutions can carry out the test, making it suitable for large-scale popularization.

[0033] 7. High compatibility: Body composition detection can be performed using bioelectrical impedance analysis or dual-energy X-ray ablation (the latter being an optional alternative), and physical fitness detection can be performed using either actual measurement or estimation methods, adapting to different scenario requirements.

[0034] The above overview is for illustrative purposes only and is not intended to be limiting in any way. In addition to the illustrative aspects, embodiments, and features described above, further aspects, embodiments, and features of the invention will become readily apparent from the accompanying drawings and the following detailed description. Attached Figure Description

[0035] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0036] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of the overall system evaluation process of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a flowchart of the body composition detection and stratification assessment process of the present invention; Figure 3 This is a flowchart of the physical fitness assessment process of the present invention; Figure 4 This is a flowchart of the comprehensive scoring and health level determination process of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0037] In the following description, only certain exemplary embodiments are briefly described. As those skilled in the art will recognize, the described embodiments can be modified in various ways without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the drawings and description are considered to be exemplary in nature and not restrictive.

[0038] The embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0039] Example 1: Evaluation of healthy male subjects aged 28 years

[0040] Subject's basic information: Male, 28 years old, height 175cm, resting heart rate 65 beats / min.

[0041] 1. Body composition analysis (bioelectrical impedance analysis)

[0042] The test results and index calculations are shown in Table 21: Table 21 Body composition test data and index calculations for Example 1

[0043] 2. Physical fitness assessment

[0044] Flexibility: The seated forward bend test was conducted twice, and the results were 18.2cm and 19.5cm respectively. The maximum value of 19.5cm was taken.

[0045] (30 points in total)

[0046] Cardiorespiratory endurance: .

[0047] Substitute into the formula: =50×(127 / 135)×(19.04 / 18.7)×(6.8 / 6.55)×((44-23.67) / 22)≈50×0.9407×1.0182×1.0382×0.9241≈50×0.9407≈47.035;47.035×1.0182≈47.88; .

[0048] .

[0049] Grip strength: The grip strength of the dominant hand was tested three times and the results were 48.2kg, 49.5kg and 48.8kg. The maximum value of 49.5kg was taken.

[0050] (Note: The grip strength score is out of 10 points, so any score exceeding 10 points will be counted as 10 points).

[0051] Muscular endurance: Substitute into the formula: .

[0052] .

[0053] 3. Overall Score

[0054] Body composition score: The body composition analyzer outputs a score of 85, which is converted to a 50-point scale: 85 / 2 = 42.5 points.

[0055] Fitness score:

[0056] Converted to a 50-point scale: 84.38 / 2≈42.19 points.

[0057] Total Health Score: The health level is "good" (≥80 points).

[0058] 4. Assessment Conclusions and Health Recommendations

[0059] The subjects were in good overall health, but had a significantly increased fat index (4.64), a significantly increased fat ratio in the limbs and trunk (1.25), and a slightly high body fat percentage (19.6%), indicating abnormal fat distribution (mainly fat accumulation in the limbs).

[0060] Recommendations: Control your daily calorie intake (reduce refined carbohydrates and saturated fats), increase aerobic exercise (such as brisk walking for 30 minutes 3 times a week), and focus on strengthening the muscles of your limbs (such as dumbbell curls and lunges) to improve fat distribution.

[0061] Example 2: Evaluation of postmenopausal female subjects aged 65 years

[0062] Basic information of the subject: female, 65 years old, height 158cm, resting heart rate 72 beats / min, and a history of osteoporosis for 2 years.

[0063] 1. Body composition analysis (bioelectrical impedance analysis)

[0064] The test results and index calculations are shown in Table 22: Table 22 Body Composition Test Data and Index Calculations in Example 2

[0065] 2. Physical fitness assessment

[0066] Flexibility: The seated forward bend test was conducted twice, and the results were 12.3cm and 13.1cm respectively. The maximum value of 13.1cm was taken.

[0067] .

[0068] Cardiorespiratory endurance: .

[0069] Substitute into the formula: .

[0070] Grip strength: The grip strength of the dominant hand was tested three times and the results were 22.5kg, 23.1kg and 22.8kg. The maximum value of 23.1kg was taken.

[0071] (A score exceeding 10 points will be counted as 10 points).

[0072] Muscular endurance: Substitute into the formula: =180×(15.14 / 16.2)×(5.2 / 5.75)×((42-20.95) / 21)≈180×0.9346×0.9043×1.0024≈152.49 seconds.

[0073] .

[0074] 3. Overall Score

[0075] Physical fitness score: Flexibility 23.1 points + Cardiorespiratory endurance 12.78 points + Grip strength 10 points + Muscle endurance 21.78 points = 67.66 points, which is approximately 33.83 points out of 50.

[0076] Total health score: 34 + 33.83 ≈ 67.83 points.

[0077] 4. Assessment Conclusions and Health Recommendations

[0078] The subjects were generally in good health, but several abnormalities were observed: low lean body mass index, low bone mineral index, low muscle mass index, low skeletal muscle mass index, significantly low muscle-to-limb ratio, slightly high body fat index, slightly high body fat percentage, and low whole-body phase angle. Combined with a history of osteoporosis, this indicated reduced muscle mass (especially in the limbs), decreased bone density, and poor cellular health.

[0079] suggestion: ① Nutritional intervention: Increase the intake of high-quality protein (1.2g / kg body weight per day), and supplement with calcium (1000mg / d) and vitamin D (800IU / d). ② Exercise intervention: Avoid balance tests that pose a high risk of falls, and adopt seated dumbbell training (twice a week, focusing on strengthening the muscles of the limbs) and water walking (three times a week, reducing the burden on the joints). ③ Regular monitoring: Body composition should be checked every 3 months, with a focus on changes in bone mineral index and limb muscle index.

[0080] Example 3: Evaluation of an 82-year-old male subject

[0081] Subject basic information: Male, 82 years old, height 168cm, resting heart rate 78 bpm, history of hypertension for 10 years (controlled with medication).

[0082] 1. Body composition analysis (bioelectrical impedance analysis)

[0083] The test results and index calculations are shown in Table 23: Table 23 Body composition test data and index calculations for Example 3

[0084] 2. Physical fitness assessment

[0085] Flexibility: The seated forward bend test was conducted twice, and the results were 6.8cm and 7.2cm respectively. The maximum value of 7.2cm was taken.

[0086] .

[0087] Cardiorespiratory endurance: .

[0088] Substitute into the formula: =50×(60 / 135)×(15.30 / 18.7)×(4.5 / 6.55)×((44-20.77) / 22)≈50×0.4444×0.8182×0.6870×1.056≈50×0.4444≈22.22;22.22×0.8182≈18.18;

[0089] Grip strength: The grip strength of the dominant hand was tested three times and the results were 26.3kg, 25.9kg and 26.1kg. The maximum value of 26.3kg was taken.

[0090] .

[0091] Muscular endurance: Substitute into the formula: .

[0092] 3. Overall Score

[0093] Body composition score: The body composition analyzer outputs a score of 52 points, which is converted to a 50-point scale: 52 / 2 = 26 points.

[0094] Fitness score: Converted to a 50-point scale: .

[0095] Total Health Score: The health level is "poor" (≥50 points is slightly poor, 48.3 <50 points is the upper limit of poor).

[0096] 4. Assessment Conclusions and Health Recommendations

[0097] The subjects' overall health was slightly poor, with several significant abnormalities: low weight, significantly low lean body mass index, significantly low muscle mass, significantly low skeletal muscle mass, significantly low muscle-to-limb ratio, significantly increased body fat index and body fat percentage (sarcopenia with obesity), significantly low whole-body phase angle (cellular function decline), and significantly low basal metabolic rate. Combined with a history of hypertension, this suggests age-related muscle loss and metabolic disorders.

[0098] suggestion: ① Medical collaboration: Adjust the antihypertensive regimen under the guidance of a cardiologist to avoid blood pressure fluctuations caused by exercise intervention; ② Nutritional fortification: Increase daily protein intake to 1.5g / kg body weight (approximately 88g / day), divided into 5-6 meals, and supplement with oral nutritional supplements (ONS) if necessary. ③ Low-intensity exercise: Adopt low-load exercises such as seated leg raises (3 times a week, 10 minutes each time) and resistance band stretching (2 times a week) to avoid falls and cardiovascular risks; ④ Monitoring frequency: Body composition is reviewed monthly, with a focus on changes in muscle mass index and phase angle, and the overall health score trend is assessed quarterly.

[0099] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of various variations or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in the present invention, and these should all be included within the scope of protection of the present invention. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present invention should be determined by the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle, characterized in that, Includes a body composition analysis module, a fitness assessment module, and a comprehensive scoring module; The body composition detection module is used to collect the subject's body composition data and calculate the body composition index based on height; The physical fitness assessment module is used to obtain four physical fitness indicators—flexibility, cardiorespiratory endurance, grip strength, and muscle endurance—through actual measurement or calculation based on body composition index. The comprehensive scoring module is used to calculate the total health score based on the body composition score and physical fitness score, and to quantitatively assess the health status on a percentage scale. The body composition index is calculated as follows: Furthermore, the ideal health standard is based on the theoretically optimal body composition state of the subjects at age 25, and the total health score is set at 100 points.

2. The proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The body composition detection module detects the following items: Body mass index, lean body mass index, bone mineral index, muscle index, skeletal muscle index, relative skeletal muscle index, limb and trunk muscle ratio, trunk muscle index, upper limb muscle index, lower limb muscle index, fat index, body fat percentage, limb and trunk fat ratio, protein index, water index, intracellular fluid index, extracellular fluid index, total extracellular fluid ratio, whole body phase angle, basal metabolic rate. The standard values ​​and fluctuation ranges for each index in healthy individuals are as follows: Body Mass Index (BMI) 22.0±2 for men and 21.0±2 for women; The lean body mass index was 18.7±1 for men and 16.2±1 for women. Bone mineral index: 1.05±0.05 for men and 0.91±0.05 for women; Muscle mass index: 17.65±1.5 for men and 15.3±1 for women; The skeletal muscle index was 10.65±0.15 for men and 8.85±0.1 for women. The relative skeletal muscle index was 8.1±0.4 for men and 6.6±0.35 for women. The muscle mass ratio of the limbs and trunk was 1.0±0.05 for men and 0.95±0.05 for women. The trunk muscle index was 8.35±0.7 for men and 7.0±0.5 for women. Upper limb muscle index: 2.2±0.3 for men and 1.6±0.2 for women; The lower limb muscle index was 6.0±0.8 for men and 5.0±0.3 for women. Fat index: 3.3±0.8 for men and 4.8±1 for women; Body fat percentage: 15% ± 3% for men and 23% ± 3% for women; The ratio of body fat in the limbs and trunk was 1.1±0.1 for men and 1.26±0.1 for women. The whole-body phase angle was 6.55±0.4 for males and 5.75±0.35 for females; the extracellular fluid ratio was 0.380±0.

01.

3. The proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The body composition detection module is also used to perform stratified evaluation of various body composition indices, compare each index with the standard value of the corresponding gender, divide it into seven levels: significantly increased, relatively high, slightly high, normal, low, significantly low, and severely low, and output the evaluation conclusion. The stratification threshold for body mass index is: For males, the values ​​are as follows: significantly elevated ≥35.00, relatively high ≥30.00, slightly high ≥24.50, normal ≥21.00, low ≥19.50, significantly low ≥18.00, and severely low <18.

00. For women, the values ​​are as follows: significantly higher ≥34.50, higher ≥29.50, slightly higher ≥23.50, normal ≥20.20, lower ≥18.50, significantly lower ≥17.00, and severely lower <17.

00. The stratification threshold for extracellular fluid ratio in males was 5.22±0.52; the stratification threshold for extracellular fluid ratio in females was 4.52±0.

45. Significantly elevated ≥0.410 (assessment conclusion: obvious edema), relatively high ≥0.400 (edema), slightly elevated ≥0.390 (mild edema), normal ≥0.370 (normal), low ≥0.360 (mild dehydration), significantly low ≥0.350 (mild dehydration), severely low <0.350 (dehydration).

4. The proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In the fitness assessment module, the flexibility score is tested by the sit-and-reach test, and the maximum value of the two tests is taken (unit: cm). The flexibility score = the test value + 10, the total score is 30 points, and the value range is 0-30. The grip strength scoring method involves measuring the maximum grip strength of the dominant hand (unit: kg) using an electronic digital grip strength meter. The scoring formula is as follows: Total score: 10 points, with a value range of 0-10.

5. The proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In the aforementioned physical fitness assessment module, the cardiorespiratory endurance score is calculated by estimating the maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max). To achieve this, the calculation formula is as follows: Wherein, heart rate reserve = 220 - age - resting heart rate, BMI is body mass index, and FFMI is fat-free body mass index; The formula for cardiorespiratory endurance scoring is: The total score is 30 points, with a range of 0-30. If the score is greater than 30, it will be counted as 30 points.

6. The proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In the aforementioned physical fitness assessment module, the muscle endurance score is achieved by calculating the plank support time, and the calculation formula is as follows: BMI stands for Body Mass Index, and FFMI stands for Fat-Free Body Mass Index. The formula for scoring muscle endurance is: The total score is 30 points, with a range of 0-30. If the score is greater than 30, it will be counted as 30 points.

7. The proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In the comprehensive scoring module, the body composition score is calculated as follows: The body composition percentage score output by the body composition analyzer is divided by 2 and converted to a 50-point scale. The physical fitness score is calculated as follows: The sum of the four scores—flexibility, cardiorespiratory endurance, grip strength, and muscular endurance—is divided by 2 and converted to a 50-point scale. The total score is 100 points. The health level classification standard is as follows: ≥90 points is excellent, ≥80 points is good, ≥70 points is good, ≥60 points is normal, ≥50 points is slightly poor, ≥40 points is poor, and <40 points is very poor.

8. The proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The system is applicable to people throughout their entire life cycle, including children aged 3 and above, adults aged 18-59, seniors aged 60-79, and seniors aged 80 and above. The assessment criteria for body composition index in adulthood are not affected by age, and the test data of the same subject can be directly compared and analyzed, supporting the establishment of a personal health yearbook.

9. A proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The body composition detection module uses bioelectrical impedance analysis for detection. Alternatively, dual-energy X-ray diffraction can also be used to detect body composition. In the fitness assessment module, cardiorespiratory endurance can be measured using the Cooper 12-minute run, smartwatch estimation, or direct testing methods, while muscular endurance can be measured using the plank exercise method. The measured results and the estimated results have the same validity.

10. A proactive health goal quantitative management and evaluation system for the entire life cycle as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The evaluation results output by the system include: The stratified assessment results of various body composition indices, individual scores for flexibility / cardiorespiratory endurance / grip strength / muscle endurance, body composition score, physical fitness score, total health score, and health level; Based on the assessment results, targeted health conditioning suggestions can be generated, providing personalized intervention directions for specific abnormal items (such as low bone mineral index and significantly increased fat index), so as to achieve the goal of proactive health management.

Images