Tooling for hob performance testing
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202520950157.4
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Utility models(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-05-14
- Publication Date
- 2026-09-04
- Estimated Expiration
- 2035-05-14
AI Technical Summary
[0004]然而,测试的效率较低,且准确性较低
[0011] The fixture for testing cooktop performance provided in this embodiment includes at least two spaced-apart test components. Each test component includes a column structure, a marking structure, and a support structure. The marking structure is configured to display different height values. The support structure is movably connected to the column structure and supports the pot support. The support structure can move relative to the column structure to different heights displayed by the marking structure. This eliminates reliance on multi-specification rubber pads, effectively avoiding test interruptions due to incomplete materials, and enabling continuous adjustment of multiple height parameters. Compared to traditional step-by-step rubber pad replacement methods, this reduces manual replacement time and lowers rubber pad procurement and management costs. Furthermore, displaying the height through the marking structure improves test accuracy. Moreover, the spaced-apart test components allow for support and height adjustment of pot supports of different shapes (e.g., square, round, irregular shapes).
Smart Images

Figure CN224719343U_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This application relates to the field of cooktop performance testing technology, and in particular to a tooling for cooktop performance testing. Background Technology
[0002] The height of the pot support is a key parameter affecting the smoke emission and thermal efficiency of the stove, and its performance needs to be optimized through precise adjustment.
[0003] In related technologies, when testing the performance of a cooktop, the height of the pot support is adjusted by using rubber pads of different sizes to raise the pot support.
[0004] However, the test is inefficient and inaccurate. Utility Model Content
[0005] This application provides a tooling for testing the performance of cooktops, which has high testing efficiency and high accuracy.
[0006] This application provides a tooling for testing the performance of cooktops, comprising:
[0007] At least two test components are set at intervals, and the test components include:
[0008] Column structure;
[0009] A marker structure, configured to display different height values;
[0010] The supporting structure is movably connected to the column structure. The supporting structure is used to support the pot support and can move relative to the column structure to different heights indicated by the marking structure.
[0011] The fixture for testing cooktop performance provided in this embodiment includes at least two spaced-apart test components. Each test component includes a column structure, a marking structure, and a support structure. The marking structure is configured to display different height values. The support structure is movably connected to the column structure and supports the pot support. The support structure can move relative to the column structure to different heights displayed by the marking structure. This eliminates reliance on multi-specification rubber pads, effectively avoiding test interruptions due to incomplete materials, and enabling continuous adjustment of multiple height parameters. Compared to traditional step-by-step rubber pad replacement methods, this reduces manual replacement time and lowers rubber pad procurement and management costs. Furthermore, displaying the height through the marking structure improves test accuracy. Moreover, the spaced-apart test components allow for support and height adjustment of pot supports of different shapes (e.g., square, round, irregular shapes).
[0012] In some embodiments, a marking structure is disposed on the outer wall of the column structure, and the marking structure includes a plurality of scale lines spaced apart along the height direction of the column structure.
[0013] In this way, the overall structure of the tooling used for testing stove performance is relatively simple and occupies less space.
[0014] In some embodiments, the support structure includes:
[0015] Snap rings, including:
[0016] The main body is fitted onto the column structure, and the main body is slidably connected to the column structure. An opening is provided on one side of the main body.
[0017] The first connecting part is provided on one side of the opening along the circumference of the retaining ring;
[0018] The second connecting part is provided on the other side of the opening along the circumference of the retaining ring, and the first connecting part and the second connecting part are arranged opposite to each other;
[0019] The support part is connected to the main body and is used to support the pot support.
[0020] A connector is inserted into the first connecting part and the second connecting part;
[0021] The fastener connects with the connector, bringing the first and second connecting parts close to each other to fix the position of the retaining ring on the column structure.
[0022] In this way, the support structure includes a retaining ring, connectors, and fasteners. The retaining ring is secured to the column structure by the tight connection of the connectors and fasteners, while the loose connection of the connectors and fasteners allows the retaining ring to slide relative to the column structure for height adjustment. This design offers high ease of operation and adjustment efficiency. Furthermore, the mechanical fixing method ensures high reliability.
[0023] In some embodiments, the connector is a bolt and the fastener is a nut.
[0024] Using standard parts in this way reduces costs.
[0025] In some embodiments, a fixing structure is also included, the fixing structure comprising:
[0026] The base is connected to the bottom of the column structure.
[0027] The chuck is located above the base and is connected to the column structure. The chuck is configured to elastically deform under external force to move away from the base.
[0028] In this way, the panel can be clamped by setting the base and the jaws. The panel is located between the jaws and the base.
[0029] In some embodiments, the extended plane of the bottom wall of the base is parallel to the horizontal plane.
[0030] In this way, the fixing structure is compatible with both clamping and free placement installation modes.
[0031] In some embodiments, the fixing structure further includes a friction element disposed on the top wall of the base and on the bottom wall of the claw.
[0032] This helps to effectively eliminate micro-displacement between the test components and the panel.
[0033] In some embodiments, a first connection structure is also included, which is configured to connect a fixed structure in two test components.
[0034] This helps improve the stability of the placement of the two test components.
[0035] In some embodiments, a second connection structure is also included, which is configured to connect the column structures in the two test components.
[0036] In this way, the column structure has good stability and is not prone to deformation.
[0037] In some embodiments, a drive structure is also included, which is connected to the support structure and drives the support structure to move relative to the column structure. Attached Figure Description
[0038] Figure 1 A schematic diagram illustrating the application status of the tooling used for testing cooktop performance provided in an embodiment of this application;
[0039] Figure 2 for Figure 1 A magnified view of a section at point A in the middle;
[0040] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the tooling for testing cooktop performance provided in an embodiment of this application;
[0041] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the test components in the tooling for testing cooktop performance provided in an embodiment of this application;
[0042] Figure 5 for Figure 4 Another structural diagram from a different angle;
[0043] Figure 6 for Figure 5 A magnified view of a section at point B in the middle;
[0044] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the support structure in the tooling for testing cooktop performance provided in an embodiment of this application;
[0045] Figure 8This is a schematic diagram of the column structure and fixing structure in the tooling for testing cooktop performance provided in an embodiment of this application.
[0046] Figure 9 for Figure 8 A magnified view of a section at point C;
[0047] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of the first and second connecting structures in the tooling for testing stove performance provided in an embodiment of this application.
[0048] Explanation of reference numerals in the attached figures:
[0049] 100-Test component; 110-Column structure; 120-Marking structure; 121-Scale line; 130-Fixing structure; 131-Base; 132-Claw; 133-Friction component; 140-Support structure; 141-Snap ring; 1411-Body; 1412-First connecting part; 1413-Second connecting part; 1414-Support part; 142-Connector; 143-Fixing component;
[0050] 200-Pot support;
[0051] 300-panel;
[0052] 400 - First connection structure;
[0053] 500 - Second connection structure. Detailed Implementation
[0054] As described in the background section, when testing stove performance, pot fixtures are raised using rubber pads of different sizes. However, this method has the following drawbacks: 1. High material dependence: When a rubber pad of a specific size is unavailable, a temporary substitute must be found, resulting in low adjustment efficiency and difficulty in ensuring accuracy. 2. Insufficient adaptability: Poor compatibility with pot supports of different shapes (such as square, round, and irregular shapes) easily leads to insufficient support stability. 3. Poor test consistency: Manually stacking rubber pads easily introduces operational errors, leading to increased dispersion in combustion parameter test results and affecting data reliability. 4. Rubber pads are prone to deformation or aging under high-temperature environments, further exacerbating height parameter deviations and making it difficult to meet the requirements of long-term repeated testing.
[0055] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this application provides a fixture for testing cooktop performance, comprising at least two spaced-apart test components. Each test component includes a column structure, a marking structure, and a support structure. The marking structure is configured to display different height values. The support structure is movably connected to the column structure and supports the pot support. The support structure can move relative to the column structure to different heights displayed by the marking structure. This eliminates reliance on multi-specification rubber pads, effectively avoiding test interruptions due to incomplete materials, and enabling continuous adjustment of multiple height parameters. Compared to traditional step-by-step rubber pad replacement methods, this reduces manual replacement time and lowers rubber pad procurement and management costs. Furthermore, displaying the height via the marking structure improves test accuracy. Moreover, the spaced-apart test components allow for support and height adjustment of pot supports of different shapes (e.g., square, round, irregular shapes).
[0056] To make the objectives, implementation methods and advantages of this application clearer, the exemplary implementation methods of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings of the exemplary embodiments of this application. Obviously, the described exemplary embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments.
[0057] It should be noted that the brief descriptions of terms in this application are only for the convenience of understanding the embodiments described below, and are not intended to limit the embodiments of this application. Unless otherwise stated, these terms should be understood in their ordinary and common meaning.
[0058] Furthermore, the terms “comprising” and “having”, and any variations thereof, are intended to cover but not exclusively include, for example, a product or device that includes a series of components is not necessarily limited to those that are explicitly listed, but may include other components that are not explicitly listed or that are inherent to such product or device.
[0059] In the description of this application, it should be understood that the terms "center", "upper", "lower", "front", "rear", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inner", "outer", etc., indicate the orientation or positional relationship based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the accompanying drawings. They are only for the convenience of describing this application and simplifying the description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, or be constructed and operated in a specific orientation. Therefore, they should not be construed as limitations on this application.
[0060] The terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features indicated. Therefore, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of this application, unless otherwise stated, "a plurality of" means two or more.
[0061] In the description of this application, it should be noted that, unless otherwise expressly specified and limited, the terms "installation," "connection," and "linking" should be interpreted broadly. For example, they can refer to a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection; they can refer to a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; they can refer to a direct connection or an indirect connection through an intermediate medium; and they can refer to the internal connection between two components. Those skilled in the art can understand the specific meaning of the above terms in this application based on the specific circumstances.
[0062] The technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.
[0063] A gas stove includes a housing. The housing serves to house and protect other components.
[0064] A gas stove includes a burner, which is connected to the casing. The burner generates a flame and heat to heat the cookware.
[0065] Specifically, the housing includes a bottom shell. The bottom shell encloses a mounting cavity with an opening. The mounting cavity can be used to accommodate components such as a flat-plate burner.
[0066] Specifically, the bottom shell may include a side plate and a bottom plate. The side plate is located on one side of the bottom plate and is disposed around the circumference of the bottom plate. The bottom plate and the side plate form the aforementioned mounting cavity.
[0067] For example, the base plate and side plates can form a rectangular mounting cavity. It is understood that the shape of the mounting cavity can be designed according to the actual situation, and no further limitations are made here.
[0068] The housing includes a panel. The panel can be used to hold and support items.
[0069] The panel is placed on top of the bottom shell and is used to cover part of the opening in the mounting cavity.
[0070] The burner is embedded in the top of the housing.
[0071] Specifically, the panel has a clearance opening to allow space for the burner. This clearance opening allows the burner to be placed so that it can heat the cookware.
[0072] Gas stoves include pot supports. Pot supports serve to concentrate energy and support cookware.
[0073] The boiler support is fitted over the burner and positioned on top of the casing. The bottom of the boiler support abuts against the top of the casing.
[0074] The height of the pot support is a key parameter affecting the combustion smoke emissions and thermal efficiency of the stove, and its performance needs to be optimized through precise adjustment. To determine the optimal height of the pot support, testing experiments are required. The final manufacturing height of the pot support will be determined based on the data from these experiments.
[0075] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the tooling used for testing cooktop performance, provided in an embodiment of this application. Figure 2 for Figure 1 A magnified view of a portion of point A in the middle. Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the tooling used for testing cooktop performance, provided in an embodiment of this application.
[0076] See Figures 1 to 3 As shown in the figure, this application provides a tooling for testing the performance of cooktops, including at least two test components 100 arranged at intervals.
[0077] For example, the number of test components 100 is two, and the two test components 100 are arranged opposite each other. Alternatively, the number of test components 100 is three, and the three test components 100 are arranged at intervals along the periphery of the pot support. Alternatively, the number of test components 100 is four.
[0078] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the test component in the tooling for testing cooktop performance provided in an embodiment of this application. Figure 5 for Figure 4 Another structural diagram from another angle, Figure 6 for Figure 5 A magnified view of a section at point B in the middle.
[0079] See Figures 4 to 6 As shown, the test component 100 includes a column structure 110. The column structure 110 can serve as a load-bearing structure.
[0080] Specifically, the column structure 110 can be columnar, for example, cylindrical or square.
[0081] In some embodiments, test component 100 includes marker structure 120.
[0082] The marker structure 120 is configured to display different height values.
[0083] In some embodiments, the test component 100 includes a fixing structure 130.
[0084] The fixing structure 130 is used to fix it to the panel 300, or the fixing structure 130 can be supported on the panel 300.
[0085] The fixing structure 130 is located at the bottom of the column structure 110.
[0086] In some embodiments, the test component 100 includes a support structure 140.
[0087] The support structure 140 is movably connected to the column structure 110, and the support structure 140 is used to support the pot support 200. The support structure 140 can move relative to the column structure 110, thereby adjusting the height of the pot support 200.
[0088] The support structure 140 moves relative to the column structure 110 to different heights indicated by the marking structure 120. This allows for a more intuitive observation of the height of the pot support bracket 200.
[0089] It should be noted that after the support structure 140 moves to the target height, it can be relative to the column structure 110, so that the height does not change under the action of gravity.
[0090] The fixture for testing cooktop performance provided in this embodiment includes at least two spaced-apart test components 100. Each test component 100 includes a column structure 110, a marking structure 120, and a support structure 140. The marking structure 120 is configured to display different height values. The support structure 140 is movably connected to the column structure 110 and supports the pot support 200. The support structure 140 can move relative to the column structure 110 to different heights displayed by the marking structure 120. This eliminates reliance on multi-specification rubber pads, effectively avoiding test interruptions due to incomplete materials, and enabling continuous adjustment of multiple height parameters. Compared to traditional step-by-step rubber pad replacement methods, this reduces manual replacement time and lowers rubber pad procurement and management costs. Furthermore, displaying the height through the marking structure 120 improves test accuracy. Moreover, the spaced-apart test components 100 can support and adjust the height of pot supports 200 of different shapes (e.g., square, round, irregular shapes).
[0091] See Figure 6As shown, in some embodiments, the marking structure 120 is disposed on the outer wall of the column structure 110, and the marking structure 120 includes a plurality of scale lines 121 spaced apart along the height direction of the column structure 110. Thus, the overall structure of the tooling used for stove performance testing is simpler and occupies less space.
[0092] The marking structure 120 is integrally formed using the MIM metal injection molding process. Metal injection molding (MIM) is a new type of powder metallurgy near-net-shape forming technology derived from the plastic injection molding industry. As is well known, plastic injection molding technology can produce products of various complex shapes at a low cost, but plastic products have low strength. In order to improve their performance, metal or ceramic powders can be added to plastics to obtain products with higher strength and better wear resistance.
[0093] In some embodiments, the surface of the column structure 110 is nitrided (hardness not less than 800 HV) to improve the wear resistance of the scale line 121.
[0094] In some embodiments, the surface of the column structure 110 is laser-engraved to form 0.5mm increment scale lines 121 (height tolerance ±0.02mm), which have a height indication function.
[0095] It should be noted that the marking structure 120 can be a ruler.
[0096] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the support structure in the tooling for testing stove performance provided in an embodiment of this application.
[0097] See Figure 6 and Figure 7 As shown, in some embodiments, the support structure 140 includes a retaining ring 141.
[0098] In some embodiments, the retaining ring 141 includes a body 1411.
[0099] The main body 1411 is fitted onto the column structure 110, and the main body 1411 is slidably connected to the column structure 110. An opening is provided on one side of the main body 1411.
[0100] Specifically, the main body 1411 is ring-shaped.
[0101] In some embodiments, the retaining ring 141 includes a first connecting portion 1412.
[0102] The first connecting part 1412 is provided on one side of the opening along the circumference of the retaining ring 141.
[0103] Specifically, the first connecting part 1412 may be in the shape of a flat plate.
[0104] In some embodiments, the retaining ring 141 includes a second connecting portion 1413.
[0105] The second connecting part 1413 is provided on the other side of the opening along the circumference of the retaining ring 141, and the first connecting part 1412 and the second connecting part 1413 are arranged opposite to each other.
[0106] Specifically, the second connecting part 1413 may be in the shape of a flat plate.
[0107] In some embodiments, the retaining ring 141 includes a support portion 1414.
[0108] The support part 1414 is connected to the main body 1411 and is used to support the pot support 200.
[0109] Specifically, the top of the support part 1414 is provided with a support surface, which is used to abut against the pot support 200.
[0110] Specifically, the support part 1414 is located on one side of the main body 1411.
[0111] In some embodiments, the retaining ring 141 can be integrally machined.
[0112] In some embodiments, the retaining ring 141 can be a split symmetrical closed structure.
[0113] In some embodiments, the retaining ring 141 may be made of a high-temperature resistant ceramic material.
[0114] In some embodiments, the support structure 140 includes a connector 142.
[0115] The connector 142 is inserted into the first connecting part 1412 and the second connecting part 1413.
[0116] In some embodiments, the support structure 140 includes a fastener 143.
[0117] The fastener 143 is connected to the connector 142, so that the first connecting part 1412 and the second connecting part 1413 are close to each other, so that the position of the retaining ring 141 on the column structure 110 is fixed.
[0118] It is understood that the support structure 140 provided in this embodiment includes a retaining ring 141, a connector 142, and a fixing member 143. The retaining ring 141 is secured to the column structure 110 by the tight connection of the connector 142 and the fixing member 143, and the retaining ring 141 can slide relative to the column structure 110 by the loose connection of the connector and the fixing member 143, thereby allowing the retaining ring 141 to be adjusted in height. This provides high ease of operation and high adjustment efficiency. Moreover, the mechanical fixing method ensures high reliability.
[0119] In some embodiments, the surface of the column structure 110 can serve as a dual-function load-bearing contact surface, dispersing 30%-40% of the axial load transmitted by the retaining ring 141.
[0120] In some embodiments, the connector 142 is a bolt and the fastener 143 is a nut. This uses standard parts, resulting in lower costs.
[0121] Specifically, the bolt can be an eye bolt.
[0122] The retaining ring 141 engages with the column structure 110, and the height adjustment of the retaining ring 141 takes only 5-8 seconds. It is precisely positioned using a nut and eye bolt in conjunction with the scale line 121, and tightened by applying a torque of 15 Nm.
[0123] In some embodiments, the connector may be a rope. The fastener may be a shackle.
[0124] It should be noted that the sliding combination of the retaining ring 141 relative to the column structure 110 can be replaced by a combination of a linear guide rail and a ball block, a magnetic levitation drive, or a roller bearing structure, etc. This embodiment will not elaborate further.
[0125] It should be noted that the retaining ring 141 can be engaged by elastic snap, magnetic limit, or pneumatic locking.
[0126] Figure 8 This is a schematic diagram of the column structure and fixing structure in the tooling for testing stove performance provided in an embodiment of this application. Figure 9 for Figure 8 A magnified view of a section at point C.
[0127] See Figure 8 and Figure 9 As shown, in some embodiments, the fixing structure 130 includes a base 131.
[0128] The base 131 is connected to the bottom of the column structure 110.
[0129] In some embodiments, the fixing structure 130 includes a claw 132.
[0130] The claw 132 is located above the base 131 and is connected to the column structure 110. The claw 132 is configured to undergo elastic deformation under external force to move away from the base 131.
[0131] Understandably, the panel 300 can be clamped by setting the base 131 and the claw 132. The panel 300 is located between the claw 132 and the base 131.
[0132] In some embodiments, the fixing structure 130 may be made of spring steel. In some embodiments, the clamping force of the fixing structure 130 is not less than 50N.
[0133] In some embodiments, the extended plane of the bottom wall of the base 131 is parallel to the horizontal plane.
[0134] Thus, the fixed structure 130 is compatible with both clamping and free placement installation modes.
[0135] In some embodiments, the fixing structure 130 further includes a friction element 133, which is disposed on the top wall of the base 131 and on the bottom wall of the claw 132.
[0136] Friction component 133 can be a rubber pad.
[0137] Specifically, friction component 133 can be made of TPU elastomer. TPU (Thermoplastic polyurethanes) is a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer rubber. It is mainly divided into polyester type and polyether type. It has a wide hardness range (60HA to 85HD), is wear-resistant, oil-resistant, transparent, and has good elasticity.
[0138] The friction element 133 can be embedded in the surface of the fixed structure 130 that contacts the panel 300 via barbs, achieving a friction coefficient of μ = 0.8 to 1.2. This effectively eliminates micro-displacement between the test component 100 and the panel 300. For example, the displacement is no greater than 0.05 mm.
[0139] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of the first and second connecting structures in the tooling for testing stove performance provided in an embodiment of this application.
[0140] See Figure 10 As shown, in some embodiments, a first connection structure 400 is also included, which is configured to connect the two test components 100 to a fixed structure 130.
[0141] This helps improve the stability of the placement of the two test components 100.
[0142] For example, there are four test components 100. There are two first connection structures 400, one of which connects two test components 100. The other first connection structure 400 connects two other test components 100.
[0143] Specifically, the first connecting structure 400 can be in the form of a flat plate or a rod.
[0144] In some embodiments, the tooling for testing cooktop performance further includes a second connection structure 500.
[0145] The second connection structure 500 is configured as a column structure 110 connecting two test components 100.
[0146] In this way, the column structure 110 has good stability and is not easily deformed.
[0147] Specifically, the second connecting structure 500 can be in the form of a flat plate or a rod.
[0148] In some embodiments, the tooling for testing cooktop performance also includes a drive structure.
[0149] The drive structure is connected to the support structure 140, and the drive structure drives the support structure 140 to move relative to the column structure 110. This improves the level of automation and the ease of operation.
[0150] Specifically, the drive structure can be an electric actuator or a hydraulic cylinder, etc.
[0151] Understandably, electric linear actuators can be designed with control algorithms or adapted to AI dynamic algorithms.
[0152] In other embodiments, height adjustment can be achieved through manual lead screw adjustment.
[0153] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of this application, and are not intended to limit them. Although this application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications can still be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalent substitutions can be made to some or all of the technical features therein. Such modifications or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application.
[0154] For ease of explanation, the above description has been provided in conjunction with specific embodiments. However, the above exemplary discussion is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the specific forms disclosed above. Various modifications and variations can be obtained based on the above teachings. The selection and description of the above embodiments are for the purpose of better explaining the principles and practical applications, thereby enabling those skilled in the art to better utilize the described embodiments and various different variations of embodiments suitable for specific use considerations.
Claims
1. A tooling for testing the performance of cooktops, characterized in that, include: At least two test components (100) are arranged at intervals, said test component (100) comprising: Column structure (110); A marker structure (120) configured to display different height values; A support structure (140) is movably connected to the column structure (110), the support structure (140) is used to support the pot support, and the support structure (140) is configured to move relative to the column structure (110) to different heights indicated by the marking structure (120).
2. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to claim 1, characterized in that, The marking structure (120) is disposed on the outer wall of the column structure (110), and the marking structure (120) includes a plurality of scale lines (121) spaced apart along the height direction of the column structure (110).
3. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to claim 1, characterized in that, The support structure (140) includes: A retaining ring (141), the retaining ring (141) comprising: The main body (1411) is sleeved on the column structure (110), the main body (1411) is slidably connected to the column structure (110), and an opening is provided on one side of the main body (1411). A first connecting part (1412) is provided on one side of the opening along the circumference of the retaining ring (141); The second connecting part (1413) is disposed on the other side of the opening along the circumference of the retaining ring (141), and the first connecting part (1412) and the second connecting part (1413) are disposed opposite to each other; A support part (1414) is connected to the body (1411) and is used to support the pot support. A connector (142) is inserted into the first connecting portion (1412) and the second connecting portion (1413); A fastener (143) is connected to the connector (142) so that the first connecting part (1412) and the second connecting part (1413) are close to each other so that the retaining ring (141) is fixed in position on the column structure (110).
4. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to claim 3, characterized in that, The connector (142) is a bolt, and the fastener (143) is a nut.
5. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to claim 1, characterized in that, It also includes a fixing structure (130), which comprises: A base (131) is connected to the bottom of the column structure (110); A claw (132) is located above the base (131) and is connected to the column structure (110). The claw (132) is configured to elastically deform under external force to move away from the base (131).
6. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to claim 5, characterized in that, The extended plane of the bottom wall of the base (131) is parallel to the horizontal plane.
7. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to claim 5, characterized in that, The fixing structure (130) further includes a friction element (133), which is disposed on the side wall of the base (131) facing the claw (132) and the side wall of the claw (132) facing the base (131).
8. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that, It also includes a first connection structure (400) configured to connect a fixed structure (130) in one of the two test components (100).
9. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that, It also includes a second connection structure (500) configured to connect the column structures (110) of the two test components (100).
10. The tooling for testing cooktop performance according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that, It also includes a drive structure, which is connected to the support structure (140) and drives the support structure (140) to move relative to the column structure (110).