Application of synthetic polyelectrolytes for increasing fixed charge density in soft tissue
Patent Information
- Application Number
- EP2024886990
- Authority / Receiving Office
- EP · EP
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Priority Date
- 2023-11-02
- Filing Date
- 2024-11-01
- Publication Date
- 2026-09-09
AI Technical Summary
Current therapeutic strategies for osteoarthritis (OA) fail to effectively restore impaired cartilage osmotic function and tissue hydration due to the loss of native glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), with existing GAG replacements like chondroitin sulfate showing limited bioavailability and structural heterogeneity.
Administration of a synthetic, negatively-charged polyelectrolyte, such as poly(styrene) sulfonate (PSS), to soft tissues with GAG loss, enhanced by a thermal responsive polymer like poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAm), to increase fixed charge density and retain the polyelectrolyte within the tissue.
The use of PSS and PNiPAm significantly increases fixed charge density in soft tissues with GAG loss, with PSS retaining within the cartilage matrix for extended periods, effectively restoring osmotic responsiveness and load-bearing function.
Smart Images

Figure US2024054137_08052025_PF_FP_ABST
Abstract
Description
[0001]2101715-001250 -1- APPLICATION OF SYNTHETIC FOR INCREASING FIXED CHARGE DENSITY IN SOFT TISSUE CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application claims priority to United States Provisional Application No. 63 / 595,625, filed November 2, 2023, and the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes. REFERENCE TO U.S. GOVERNMENT SUPPORT This invention was made with government support under grant number P20GM139760 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The United States has certain rights in the invention. FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to the use of a polyelectrolyte for increasing fixed charge density in a soft tissue, for example, having a loss of native glycosaminoglycans (GAG). BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Despite the high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), there are no effective therapeutic strategies that significantly recover impaired cartilage osmotic function during disease progression. While the collagenous matrix network provides cartilage with an intrinsic stiffness, interstitial fluid content within the tissue provides cartilage with crucial viscoelastic properties for repeated loading and lubrication. Tissue hydration is driven by negatively charged glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains, which are linear-chained polysaccharides functionalized with sulfate groups and covalently attached to proteoglycans that are embedded throughout the collagenous extracellular matrix. Negative charges derived from GAGs give rise to a fixed charge density in cartilage and the subsequent Donnon ionic effect, which ultimately contributes 85% of the total osmotic pressure within the tissue. During early stages of OA, matrix GAG content decreases considerably due to increased enzymatic degradation as well as age-related variations in synthesis. This results in an initial loss of water retention and lubrication, which ultimately makes the cartilage matrix more susceptible to further damage due to impaired load-bearing function. Although several prior strategies have attempted to restore mechanical function in OA cartilage by stiffening the collagen network, there has been comparatively fewer studies on restoring the osmotic function of tissue through proteoglycan replacements or GAG-based therapeutics. 2101715-001250 -2- Traditional approaches have studied GAGs, primarily chondroitin sulfate (CS), in combination with glucosamine, as an oral treatment for symptomatic OA. However, results show conflicting clinical efficacy of using CS to treat OA, in part due to the limited bioavailability (only 10% – 20%) from oral dosing. CS as intra-articular injections has also been explored, however CS fails to effectively reduce the frictional coefficient of cartilage with GAG loss to native levels. Furthermore, CS is unable to effectively repair fluid load support in ex vivo cartilage explant studies. Finally, due to inconsistent isolation and purification techniques, pharmaceutical and commercial grade CS often exhibit high structural heterogeneity and high contamination. As CS is primarily obtained from animal sources such as bovine, porcine, avian or fish sources, there is also a potential risk of transmittable zoonotic diseases. These results question the effectiveness of using CS intra-articular injections as a prophylactic OA treatment and justifies the need for alternative GAG replacements. Instead of using isolated CS, there has been a growing interest in developing alternative therapeutics that restore proteoglycan osmotic load-bearing function and tissue hydration in GAG-depleted cartilage. While hydrogels functionalized with GAGs attempt to mimic some of the biochemical roles of GAGs within cartilage, they do not directly replicate the biophysical and structural functions of GAG or proteoglycan molecules. These hydrogels are also susceptible to degradation in vivo, require in vivo crosslinking for utility and stability since CS is water soluble, and often require transplantation surgeries with complementary scaffold structures for mechanical integrity in vivo. In an ideal format, injectable, non-degradable polyanionic hydrogels would be used to replace lost bulk fixed charge density, however, current options are limited. As an alternative to replacing the bulk-matrix through functionalized hydrogels, there has been interest in developing specialized mimetic molecules for intra-articular injections that restore or replace proteoglycan osmotic function. For instance, Panitch and co-workers synthesize matrix binding peptides grafted to a CS backbone. These molecules restored the bulk equilibrium compressive moduli in GAG-depleted cartilage explants, but they are susceptible to digestion by native peptidases, limiting their long-term retention and potential therapeutic benefit. In another approach, Marcolongo and co-workers grafted CS onto synthetic polymeric backbones, recreating the bottlebrush structure found in aggrecan without the susceptibility to enzymatic digestion found in recombinant proteoglycans. 2101715-001250 -3- While these compounds diffused quickly the cartilage matrix, they primarily localized in the pericellular matrix, with a proposed mechanism of physical adhesive interactions with the native aggrecan network. This specific localization may pose challenges during the delivery and adequate restoration of fixed charge density in cartilage with more significant aggrecan loss during OA progression. Commercially available treatments primarily address the veterinary arthritis market and include brands like ADEQUAN®(polysulfated GAGs) and LEGEND®(hyaluronate sodium). While ADEQUAN®, a heparin analogue, is primarily used for its anti-inflammatory benefits, treatment has also been associated with clinical cases of hypocoagulation. On the other hand, LEGEND®and other viscosupplementation treatments are primarily used to improve joint lubrication and may not directly restore bulk tissue osmotic function. Overall, the development of GAG and proteoglycan analogues remains a critical area of research. An on-going challenge for designing such mimetic molecules has been elucidating the role of chemical structure and charge of polyelectrolytes on their solute transport properties within cartilage. Cartilage is an anisotropic, porous tissue with an effective pore size of approximately 6 nm, and so the transport mechanics of therapeutic molecules are subject to factors arising from both the solute and tissue. For example, Travascio et al. showed that solute size has an inverse effect on diffusivity within the tissue (i.e., solutes with smaller Stokes radii had higher diffusion coefficients), and that diffusivity is also dependent on the tissue GAG content. (Travascio et al., Osteoarthr. Cartil. Open 2020, 2 (4), 100087. https: / / doi.org / 10.1016 / j.ocarto.2020.100087). Furthermore, solutes with Stokes radii larger than the 6 nm effective pore size of cartilage were still able to rapidly diffuse through the tissue, most probably because these molecules preferentially move between the collagen fibrils (which are spaced ~50 – 100 nm apart) instead of between the GAG molecules (which are spaced ~ 5 nm apart). Broadly speaking, solutes can also display nonuniform diffusion kinetics that differ in each zone of cartilage. Leddy et al. found that moderate sized dextrans (40 kDa and 70 kDa) diffuse faster in the deep zone as compared to the superficial zone while smaller and larger sized dextrans (3 kDa and 500 kDa) diffuse faster in the superficial zone as compared to the deep zone. This indicates the presence of zonal size thresholds within cartilage. Despite well-established studies on the transport of small molecules, the transport of larger polymeric structures is less understood. For instance, DiDomenico et al. 2101715-001250 -4- demonstrated that the transport mechanics of and random-coil solutes, like polyelectrolytes, through cartilage is poorly predicted by traditional models based on spherical solutes, and that flexible molecules can adjust their shape as they move through the anisotropic tissue, improving their diffusivity compared to similarly sized spherical molecules. (DiDomenico et al., Osteoarthr. Cartil.2018, 26 (11), 1438–1446. https: / / doi.org / 10.1016 / j.joca.2018.07.006; Didomenico et al. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.2018, 14 (7), 393–403. https: / / doi.org / 10.1038 / s41584-018-0033-5). This indicates that solute shape has important consequences on the design of both semi-synthetic and synthetic GAG and proteoglycan mimics. Native aggrecan has a bottlebrush structure and native CS bristles are linear chained polysaccharides. In addition to shape, charge plays a significant role on polyelectrolyte transport because of electrostatic interactions between the solute and the charged cartilage matrix. However, most research on polyelectrolyte transport and drug delivery has focused on polycationic molecules, whereas aggrecan and CS are negatively charged polyanions. For example, Bajpayee and co-workers demonstrated that avidin, a positively charged molecule, displays higher partition coefficients than its neutrally charged counterpart, neutravidin. Similar research on large polyanionic molecules remains limited. Inarguably, solute size, charge and shape all affect delivery and retention of therapeutic molecules in cartilage, whose composition and structure undergo significant changes under traumatic loading and during OA disease progression. The design of GAG and proteoglycan replacements requires careful comprehension and optimization of the transport mechanics of these polyanionic compounds through the tissue. There remains a need for GAG and proteoglycan analogues that help restore osmotic responsiveness in OA cartilage and rebuild impaired load-bearing tissue function via tissue hydration. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for increasing fixed charge density in a soft tissue. The inventors have surprisingly discovered that the dissociation of synthetic polyelectrolyte poly(styrene) sulfonate (PSS) into a negatively-charged polymer in a soft tissue having a loss of native glycosaminoglycans (GAG) increased the fixed charge density in the soft tissue. The inventors have also surprisingly discovered that the retention of the PSS within the soft tissue was enhanced by thermal responsive polymer poly(N- isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAm). 2101715-001250 -5- The present invention provides a for increasing the fixed charge density in a soft tissue having a loss of native glycosaminoglycans (GAG). The method comprises administering to the soft tissue a synthetic, negatively-charged polyelectrolyte in an amount effective for increasing the fixed charge density in the soft tissue. The soft tissue may have a partial loss of the native GAG. The soft tissue may be a cartilage. The soft tissue may be in a subject. The synthetic polyelectrolyte may be administered to the subject. The synthetic polyelectrolyte may be poly(styrene) sulfonate (PSS). The synthetic polyelectrolyte may be a copolymer of poly(styrene) sulfonate (PSS) and a thermal responsive polymer, and the copolymer may transform reversibly from a liquid to a micelle or larger aggregate upon heating. The thermal responsive polymer may be poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAm) and the copolymer may be PSS-PNiPAm. The PSS-PNiPAm may be PSS-b-PNiPAm. The PSS-PNiPAm may be PSS-g-PNiPAm. The method may further comprise retaining at least 5% of the synthetic polyelectrolyte in the soft tissue for at least 1 day. The method may further comprise decreasing permeability in the soft tissue. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG.1 shows color changes observed after removal of the RAFT chain end group. The left vial of each pair is the original PSS synthesized with the end group still attached (PSS-13kDa, PSS-30kDa and PSS-223kDa). And the right vial of each pair is the corresponding final PSS sample, obtained after the cleavage reaction, with the end group removed (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa). FIG.2 shows UV-Vis spectra indicating the removal of the RAFT end group after cleavage with H2O2. The presence of the RAFT end group is indicated visually by an intrinsic orange-pink color of the sample and correspondingly by the presence of the absorbance peak around λ ~ 500 nm in the visible absorbance spectra. FIG.3 shows GPC traces of polymers. Dashed lines indicate PSS before cleavage of the RAFT chain end. Solid lines indicate PSS after cleavage of the RAFT chain end and also the reference CS-A (chondroitin sulfate A). All samples indicated by solid lines were subsequently used in tissue experimentation. FIGS.4A-B show (A) UV-Vis absorbance spectra curves from taken from λ = 220 nm and λ = 850 nm. Each absorbance spectrum line is the average of n = 3 wells. Insert 2101715-001250 -6- presents absorbance overlap at λ = 225 nm and common protease inhibitor cocktail (5 mM BHCl + 5 mM EDTA) using in cartilage studies. Each absorbance spectrum line is the average of n = 3 wells. (B) Example UV-Vis calibration curves of PSS-11kDa, PSS- 20kDa and PSS-65kDa, taken at λ = 225 nm and λ = 230 nm. n = 3 per each concentration and at each wavelength. Calibration curves were background subtracted against the average of n = 3 wells of 1X PBS (buffer solution). FIG.5 shows absorbance spectra of Safranin O staining solution dilutions, as determined through UV-Vis Spectroscopy. Each absorbance spectrum line is the average of n = 3 wells. FIG.6 shows structure of cartilage extracellular matrix and chemical structures of CS-A (GAG) versus PSS. CS-A = chondroitin sulfate A, GAG = glycosaminoglycan, PSS = poly(styrene sulfonate). FIGS.7A-C show CS-A diffusion at 4 °C. PBS = phosphate buffered saline, CS-A = chondroitin sulfate A, GAG = glycosaminoglycan, SZ = superficial zone, DZ = deep zone. (A) Timeline of diffusion experiment. Controls and CS-A (50 mg / mL) treated explants were fixed and stained immediately following the 24 h diffusion period. (B) Average Safranin O area percentage, as quantified from Safranin O staining. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. n = 15 images taken over 3 explants per group. Statistical significance compared against negative control as determined with a Steel-Dwass nonparametric multiple comparisons test (ns = not significant, **** p < 0.0001). (C) Photomicrographs of Safranin O staining. All images oriented the same way with respect to cartilage zones. FIGS.8A-B show repeat experiment of CS-A diffusion at 4 °C. (A) Timeline of diffusion experiment. Treated group was treated with 50 mg / mL CS-A solution following GAG (glycosaminoglycan) digestion. Controls and treated samples were fixed and stained after 24 h diffusion. (B) Pictomicrographs of Safranin O staining. All images oriented the same way with respect to cartilage zones. FIGS.9A-D show PSS unsteady state diffusion over range (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) at 37 °C. PBS = phosphate buffered saline, PSS = poly(styrene sulfonate), GAG = glycosaminoglycan, SZ = superficial zone, DZ = deep zone. (A) Timeline of unsteady-state diffusion experiment. Controls were fixed and stained immediately at t = 4 h. PSS treated samples were fixed and stained after t = 5 min, t = 15 min and t = 60 min incubation in PSS solution (50 mg / mL). (B) Average Safranin O area percentage, as 2101715-001250 -7- quantified from Safranin O staining. Error standard error of the mean. n = 10 images taken over 2 explants per group. Statistical significance compared against negative control as determined with a Steel-Dwass nonparametric multiple comparisons test (ns = not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). (C) Average unsteady diffusion coefficients calculated at t = 5 min from intensities of Safranin O staining. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. n = 10 images taken over 2 explants per group. Statistical significance, within each zone, determined with a Steel-Dwass nonparametric multiple comparisons test (** p < 0.01). (D) Photomicrographs of Safranin O staining. All images oriented the same way with respect to cartilage zones. FIGS.10A-B show examples of diffusion analysis to calculate PSS diffusion coefficients. SZ = superficial zone, DZ = deep zone. (A) Image conversion and image rotation of an example Safranin O pictomicrograph (PSS-20kDa, 5 min diffusion time). (B) Average Safranin O pixel intensities parallel to the cartilage surface over tissue depth. Diffusion profiles were fitted with Fick’s second law to calculate diffusion coefficients from both sides of the tissue. FIGS.11A-C show PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) diffusion and desorption at 4 °C. PBS = phosphate buffered saline, PSS = poly(styrene sulfonate), GAG = glycosaminoglycan, SZ = superficial zone, DZ = deep zone. (A) Timeline of desorption experiment. Controls were fixed and stained at Day 0. PSS (50 mg / mL) treated samples were fixed and stained at Day 0 and Day 4. (B) Photomicrographs of Safranin O staining. All images oriented the same way with respect to cartilage zones. (C) Average relative PSS mass loss (normalized against the total mass loss during the 4 day period) in supernatant over every 24 h PBS rinse, as quantified using UV-Vis spectroscopy at λ = 225 nm. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. n = 3 cartilage explants per group. Statistical significance, within each group, determined with a Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparisons test (* p < 0.05). Total PSS mass loss (mg) over the entire 4-day period (Day 0 – 4) shown in the insert. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. n = 3 cartilage explants per group. Statistical significance determined with a Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparisons test (groups connected by the same letter are not significant at p-value of 0.05). FIGS.12A-D show PSS-65kDa desorption under loading at 25 °C. PBS = phosphate buffered saline, PSS = poly(styrene sulfonate), GAG = glycosaminoglycan, SZ = superficial zone, DZ = deep zone. (A) Timeline of desorption experiment. Controls were fixed and 2101715-001250 -8- stained after the 24 h diffusion period. PSS (50 mg / mL PSS-65kDa, loaded and unloaded) samples were fixed and stained upon completion of the entire loading timeframe (after 60 cycles). (B) Average Safranin O area percentage, as quantified from Safranin O staining. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. n = 15 images taken over 3 explants per group. Statistical significance compared against negative control as determined with a Steel-Dwass nonparametric multiple comparisons test (**** p < 0.0001). (C) Average PSS loss concentration (mg / mL) in supernatant over every loading period, as quantified using UV-Vis spectroscopy at λ = 225 nm. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. n = 3 cartilage explants per group. Statistical significance, within each group, was determined with a t-test (ns = not significant). Total PSS mass loss (mg) over the entire loading period (5 – 60 cycles) shown in the insert. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. n = 3 cartilage explants per group. Statistical significance determined with a t-test (ns = not significant). (D) Photomicrographs of Safranin O staining. All images oriented the same way with respect to cartilage zones. Staining of the loaded and unloaded samples was performed after completion of the loading cycles, at the end of the experiment. FIGS.13A-D show exemplary loading cycles for PSS desorption from cartilage biopsies under unconfined compression testing with a target applied force of approximately 3 N. Loading velocity = 0.2 mm / s. (A) 5 compression cycle period. (B) 15 compression cycle period. (C) 30 compression cycle period. (D) 60 compression cycle period. FIG.14 shows comparison of UV-Vis background absorbance at λ = 225 nm for negative controls. Graph depicts negative controls from experiments run with cartilage biopsies (full thickness tissue with no bone attached) versus osteochondral plugs (full thickness tissue with bone attached). All samples were 6 mm in diameter and cylindrical in shape. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean where n = 3 explants. Statistical significance determined with a Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparisons test (groups connected by the same letter are not significant at p-value of 0.05). FIG.15 shows SAXS curves of CS-A versus PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa), with curve fits using the Porod function. All four solutes were dissolved at a concentration of 50 mg / mL in 1X PBS. PSS = poly(styrene sulfonate), CS-A = chondroitin sulfate A. FIG.16 shows Guinier analysis (linearization and regression fits) for SAXS data of CS-A versus PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa). 2101715-001250 -9- FIG.17 shows analysis of SAXS through linearization and regression fits to determine the Porod exponent (D) for CS-A versus PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS- 65kDa). FIGS.18A-B show (A) Kratky plot for SAXS data of CS-A versus PSS (PSS- 11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa). (B) Porod-Debye plot for SAXS data of CS-A versus PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa). FIG.19 shows Safranin O – polyanion complex absorption spectra for CS-A, PSS- 11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa. Each absorbance spectrum line is the average of n = 3 wells. Inserts illustrate solution color changes as the concentrations of the standard solutions are increased (from 0 mg / mL to 10 mg / mL from left to right). FIG.20 shows that PSS-b-PNiPAm remains within cartilage explants for at least 5 days at 37°C, even after 5 PBS rinses (as evidenced by purple band). Without PNiPAm, PSS retains for shorter duration (blue and absence of red or purple). Penetration from deep zone is not physiologically relevant and due to usage of cartilage slices. FIG.21 shows 90.1% restoration of permeability in bovine osteochondral explants. PSS treated explants first underwent a partial GAG digestion (using trypsin) for 4 h and then were treated with 50 mg / mL PSS. All explants (three groups) underwent stress relaxation mechanical testing (20% strain for 10 min). n = 9 explants per group, 27 total. *** - p < 0.001, p < 0.0001. FIG.22 shows1H NMR spectrum of PSS176-b-PNIPAM268 in D2O. Fig.23 shows1H NMR spectrum of PSS96-b-PNIPAM440in D2O. Fig.24 shows GPC of the PSS macro-CTA and PSS-block-PNIPAM block copolymers (BCP) for a. PSS176-b-PNIPAM268, b. PSS96-b-PNIPAM440. Fig.25 shows GPC of the PSS-block-PNIPAM before (solid line) and after (dotted line) RAFT end removal for a. PSS176-b-PNIPAM268, b. PSS96-b-PNIPAM440. Fig.26 shows UV-visible spectroscopy of the PSS-block-PNIPAM before (solid line) and after (dotted line) RAFT end removal for a. PSS176-b-PNIPAM268, b. PSS96-b- PNIPAM440. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to administration of a synthetic, negatively -charged polyelectrolyte to a soft tissue having a loss of native glycosaminoglycans (GAG) to increase the fixed charge density in the soft tissue. The invention is based on the inventors’ 2101715-001250 -10- surprising discovery that polystyrene increased the fixed charge density in a soft tissue having a loss of GAG and the retention of the PSS in the soft tissue was enhanced by a thermal responsive polymer poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAm). The invention also relates to a copolymer of the PSS and a thermal responsive polymer (e.g., PNiPAm). The inventors have demonstrated how PSS can be used to synthetically replace lost bulk negative charge in cartilage with complete GAG loss and use it as a model polyelectrolyte to probe polyanion transport in cartilage. PSS is widely used as a reference polyelectrolyte standard in a variety of industries, since it is one of the few water-soluble polymers that has a high negative charge density with controllable molecular weight and dispersity. PSS was also selected for its well-known solution dynamics (reasonably described by simple random coil dynamics), for its immunity from cleavage by OA- associated enzymes due to its synthetic nature, and for its biocompatibility. PSS is currently used as a therapeutic to reduce total body potassium levels in patients with hyperkalemia, and has also been used in drug discovery for its low cytotoxicity and anti-microbial properties. However, the application of PSS as a GAG substitute and its transport in hydrated soft tissue systems such as cartilage has not yet been experimentally explored. The inventors have calculated the transport kinetics of PSS within bovine cartilage tissue that has been completed digested of GAG, as measured by Safranin-O staining. Effective zonal based diffusion coefficients of three different molecular weights of PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) were calculated, and the polymers were found to penetrate in faster from the deeper side than from the superficial side. Furthermore, while PSS treated cartilage demonstrated improved restoration and retention of negative charge, cartilage treated with chondroitin sulfate A (CS-A) displayed little to no such effectiveness. This enhanced delivery is hypothesized to be a result of the increased compact conformation of the PSS, which helps the polymer diffuse through and bind better with the tissue matrix. The inventor have also found molecular-weight dependent effects, and that of the three molecular weights, a considerable amount of PSS-65kDa was able to be retained for up to four days and upon loading at low compressive stresses. The results from this study address the critical need and yields the design of proteoglycan and GAG analogues therapeutics that effectively restore tissue mechanical function in OA cartilage or improve the performance of synthetic biomaterials in whole-tissue replacements. 2101715-001250 -11- The term “fixed charge density” as refers to the total negative charge in a sample (e.g., soft tissue) submerged in water. The fixed charge density in a sample (e.g., soft tissue) may be determined using conventional techniques known in the art, for example, dimethylmethylene blue assay. The term “loss of native glycosaminoglycans (GAG)” as used herein refers to the loss of native, negatively-charged proteoglycans from a sample (e.g., soft tissue), which would have contributed to the fixed charge density in the sample (e.g., soft tissue) if not lost. The native GAG loss from a sample (e.g., soft tissue) may be determined using conventional techniques known in the art, for example, dimethylmethylene blue assay or histological staining with Toludine Blue and Safranin-O. The term “soft tissue” as used herein refers to cartilage, connective tissue, the lens, or other non-bone tissue. The term “control soft tissue” as used herein refers to a soft tissue from a healthy subject (e.g., human). The term “subject” as used herein refers to a mammal. The mammal may be a human, horse, dog, cat, rabbit, mouse, or a farm animal. The term “synthetic” as used herein refers to not naturally occurring in or produced by a subject (e.g., human). The term “polyelectrolyte” as used herein refers to a polymer containing repeated units that dissociate into an ionized form in a solvent. The polyelectrolyte may dissociate into a negatively-charged polymer in a solvent. Where the solvent is water, the polyelectrolyte may dissociate into a water-soluble negatively-charged polymer. The term “thermo-responsive polymer” as used herein refers to a polymer having a property that changes with temperature. Such a property may be specifically exploited in its design or usage. The term “transition temperature” as used herein refers to the temperature at which a polymer undergoes a distinctive reordering of molecular structure. The term “permeability” as used herein refers to the average pore size of a sample (e.g., soft tissue). The permeability relates to fluid flow between the pores while fluid flow is usually related to the pore size but not always. The permeability of a sample (e.g., soft tissue) may be determined using conventional techniques known in the art, for example, creep indentation testing. 2101715-001250 -12- The present invention provides a for increasing the fixed charge density in a soft tissue having a loss of native proteoglycan (GAG). The method comprises administering to the soft tissue a synthetic polyelectrolyte, and dissociating the synthetic polyelectrolyte into a negatively-charged polymer in the soft tissue such that the fixed charge density in the soft tissue is increased. The soft tissue may be selected from the group consisting, but not limited to, cartilage, lens, extracellular matrices, and connective tissue. For example, the soft tissue may be cartilage. The soft tissue may be in a subject. The subject may be a mammal, for example, a human, or horse, dog, cat, rabbit, mouse, and farm animals. The method may comprise administering the synthetic polyelectrolyte to the soft tissue in the subject or a body fluid adjacent to the soft tissue in the subject. The soft tissue may be an explant from a subject. The explant may have been cultured in in vitro for a predetermined time, for example, for at least 1-14 days, 1-7 days, 1-5 days, or 1-3 days. The soft tissue may have a partial loss of the native GAG or a complete loss of the native GAG. For example, the native GAG loss in the soft tissue may be about 0.1-100 %, 0.1-99 %, 0.1-95 %, 0.1-90 %, 0.1-80 %, 0.1-70 %, 0.1-60 %, 0.1-50 %, 0.1-40 %, 0.1- 30 %, 0.1-20 %, 0.1-10 %, 0.1-5 %, 0.1-1 %, 1-100 %, 1-99 %, 1-95 %, 1-90 %, 1-80 %, 1- 70 %, 1-60 %, 1-50 %, 1-40 %, 1-30 %, 1-20 %, 1-10 %, 1-5 %, 10-100 %, 10-99 %, 10- 95 %, 10-90 %, 10-80 %, 10-70 %, 10-60 %, 10-50 %, 10-40 %, 10-30 %, 10-20 %, 10- 100 %, 10-99 %, 10-95 %, 10-90 %, 10-80 %, 10-70 %, 10-60 %, 10-50 %, 50-100 %, 50- 99 %, 50-95 %, 50-90 %, 50-80 %, 50-70 % or 50-60 %, as compared with the native GAG content in a control soft tissue. The synthetic polyelectrolyte may be selected from the group consisting of polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), polymaleic acid (PMA), polyacrylic acid (PAA) and a copolymer thereof with other charged or non-charged polymers (e.g., PS-co-PAA, and PSS- co-glycidyl methacrylate). The synthetic polyelectrolyte may be a copolymer comprising a thermal responsive polymer. The copolymer may transform reversibly from a liquid to a micelle or larger aggregate upon heating. The thermal responsive polymer may have a transition temperature of about 30-40oC, 30-39oC, 30-38oC, 30-37oC, 30-36oC, 30-35oC, 35-40oC, 32-40oC, 2101715-001250 -13- 32-39oC, 32-38oC, 32-37oC, 32-36oC, 32- 35-40oC, 35-39oC, 35-38oC, 35-37oC, 35-36oC, 36-40oC, 36-39oC, 36-38oC, 36-37oC, 37-40oC, 37-39oC, or 37-38oC. The thermal responsive polymer may be selected from the group consisting of poly(N- isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAm) with a transition temperature at 32-35oC, poly (N, N- diethylacrylamide) with a transition temperature at 32-34oC, poly (methyl vinyl ether) with a transition temperature at 37oC, Poly(vinyl N-alkyl ethers) with a transition temperature at 30-40oC, and poly(N-vinyl caprolactam) with a transition temperature at 35-37oC. For example, the thermal responsive polymer may be PNiPAm. The synthetic polyelectrolyte may be a copolymer of poly(styrene) sulfonate (PSS) and a thermal responsive polymer. The thermal responsive polymer may be selected from the group consisting of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAm), poly (N, N- diethylacrylamide), poly (methyl vinyl ether), Poly(vinyl N-alkyl ethers) and poly(N-vinyl caprolactam). Where the thermal responsive polymer is PNiPAm, the synthetic polyelectrolyte may be a copolymer of PSS-PNiPAm. The PSS-PNiPAm may be PSS-b- PNiPAm or PSS-g-PNiPAm. The method may further comprise retaining a predetermined amount of the synthetic polyelectrolyte in the soft tissue for a predetermined time. The predetermined amount of the synthetic polyelectrolyte retained in the soft tissue may be at least about 1 %, 2 %, 3 %, 4 %, 5 %, 6 %, 7 %, 8 %, 9 %, 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 %, 90 %, 95 %, 99 %, or 100 %, or about 0.01-1 %, 0.01-2 %, 0.01-3 %, 0.01-4 %, 0.01-5 %, 0.01- 6 %, 0.01-7 %, 0.01-8 %, 0.01-9 %, 0.01-10 %, 0.01-20 %, 0.01-30 %, 0.01-40 %, 0.01- 50 %, 0.01-60 %, 0.01-70 %, 0.01-80 %, 0.01-90 %, 0.01-95 %, 0.01-99 %, 0.01-100 %, 1- 2 %, 1-3 %, 1-4 %, 1-5 %, 1-6 %, 1-7 %, 1-8 %, 1-9 %, 1-10 %, 1-20 %, 1-30 %, 1-40 %, 1- 50 %, 1-60 %, 1-70 %, 1-80 %, 1-90 %, 1-95 %, 1-99 %, or 1-100 %, based on the total weight of the synthetic polyelectrolyte administered into the soft tissue. The method may further comprise decreasing permeability in the soft tissue. The permeability in soft tissue may be decreased by at least about 1 %, 2 %, 3 %, 4 %, 5 %, 6 %, 7 %, 8 %, 9 %, 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 %, 90 %, 95 %, 99 %, or 100 %, or about 0.01-1 %, 0.01-2 %, 0.01-3 %, 0.01-4 %, 0.01-5 %, 0.01-6 %, 0.01-7 %, 0.01-8 %, 0.01-9 %, 0.01-10 %, 0.01-20 %, 0.01-30 %, 0.01-40 %, 0.01-50 %, 0.01-60 %, 0.01-70 %, 0.01-80 %, 0.01-90 %, 0.01-95 %, 0.01-99 %, 0.01-100 %, 1-2 %, 1-3 %, 1-4 %, 1-5 %, 1-6 %, 1-7 %, 1-8 %, 1-9 %, 1-10 %, 1-20 %, 1-30 %, 1-40 %, 1-50 %, 1-60 %, 1- 2101715-001250 -14- 70 %, 1-80 %, 1-90 %, 1-95 %, 1-99 %, or %, based on the permeability in the soft tissue when the synthetic polyelectrolyte is administered into the soft tissue. The term “about” as used herein when referring to a measurable value such as an amount, a percentage, and the like, is meant to encompass variations of ±20% or ±10%, more preferably ±5%, even more preferably ±1%, and still more preferably ±0.1% from the specified value, as such variations are appropriate. Example 1. Kinetics and retention of polystyrene sulfonate for proteoglycan replacement in cartilage Tissue hydration provides articular cartilage with dynamic viscoelastic properties, crucial to its function Early osteoarthritis (OA) is marked by loss of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans (GAG), lowering fixed charge density, and impairing tissue function. The most common GAG replacement, chondroitin sulfate, has failed to show effectiveness. Here, we investigated a synthetic polyelectrolyte, poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS), both as a model compound to investigate polyelectrolyte transport in cartilage, and as a potential candidate to restore bulk fixed charge density in cartilage with GAG loss. Through bovine explants and histology, we determined zonal-based effective diffusion coefficients for three different molecular weights of PSS. Compared to chondroitin sulfate, PSS was retained longer in GAG-depleted cartilage in static and compression-based desorption experiments. We explained enhanced solute performance of PSS by its more compact morphology and higher charge density by SAXS. This may improve design of GAG mimetic molecules for repairing osmotic function in OA cartilage. 1. EXPERIMENTAL MATERIALS AND METHODS 1.1. PSS Sample Preparation. PSS synthesis was achieved using reversible addition- fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization. This method enables the facile synthesis of PSS with discrete molecular weights and low dispersity, but without the complexity or use of metals, as typically required in other controlled radical polymerization methods. (Truong et al., Nat. Rev. Chem.2021, 5 (12), 859–869. https: / / doi.org / 10.1038 / s41570-021-00328-8). The following materials were used throughout: Sodium 4-styrenesulfonate (NaSS), 4,4′-azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid) (ACVA), the RAFT chain transfer agent (CTA) 4-cyano-4-(phenylcarbonothioylthio) pentanoic acid and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Spectrum™ Spectra / Por™ 3 RC Dialysis Membrane Tubing 3500 2101715-001250 -15- Dalton MWCO was purchased through Distilled water filtered using a Milli-Q purification system was also used throughout. PSS was first synthesized following the procedure from Lo et al. (Polym. Chem. 2022, 13 (19). https: / / doi.org / 10.1039 / d2py00271j): NaSS (10 g, 48.50 mmol), 4-cyano-4- (phenylcarbonothioylthio) pentanoic acid (314.3 mg, 1.125 mmol) and ACVA (63.06 mg, 0.225 mmol) were added to a 100 mL single-neck, round-bottomed flask and dissolved in 33 mL water and 11 mL ethanol, before being degassed for 30 min under nitrogen. The reaction mixture was next placed into a 70 °C oil bath, and reacted for at least 16 h, after which it was stopped with rapid cooling and exposure to air. The PSS was purified by dialysis over a period of 16 h, before drying under heat and vacuum. The RAFT polymerization reaction scheme and reaction conditions have been provided in the Supporting Information (Scheme 1 & Table 1). Through this sample preparation procedure, we were able to achieve 100% fully sulfonated PSS that were subsequently used throughout the rest of this paper for tissue experimentation. molecular weights. Table 1. Summary of PSS polymers obtained by RAFT polymerization Polymera[RAFT]:[M]:[I] Time (h) Mn (kDa)bMw (kDa) Dispersity, ÐbPSS-13kDa 1 : 43.11 : 0.2 16 9.9 1.30 PSS-30kDa 1 : 107.78 : 0.2 16 24.5 30.1 1.22 PSS- 1 : 1021.03 : 0.2 24 177.0 223.0 1.26 223kDaaExample for PSS-13kDa of the naming convention used in this article: 13 kDa refers to 13 kg mol−1, the weight averaged molecular weight of the PSSNa polymer.bObtained by GPC. 1.2 Removal of RAFT agent. The sulfur-based RAFT chain end group present in the PSS after the RAFT polymerization reaction may have unknown cytotoxicity issues, thus the dithiobenzoate end group was removed based on a procedure from Jesson et al.61 2101715-001250 -16- Cleavage of the dithiobenzoate group follows: A 7.5% w / w solution of PSS (8.01 g, 0.0388 mol) in DI water (107 mL) was prepared and a 30% w / w aqueous solution of H2O2 (0.42 mL, 0.00411 mol; H2O2:CTA molar ratio = 5:1) was added. The resulting solution was placed into a 70 °C oil bath and left open to air to react for 16 h. The solution was found to be acidic and was brought to pH = 7 using 5 M NaOH. The polymer was then dialyzed over a period of 16 h before drying under heat and vacuum to obtain the neat polymer. The cleavage reaction scheme and reaction conditions have been provided in the Supporting Information (Scheme 2 & Table 2). Confirmation of successful removal of the RAFT end group, indicated by the intrinsic color change of the samples, was determined using UV-Vis spectroscopy (FIGS.1 and 2). Scheme 2. Table 2. Final PSS SampleaPSS Sample UsedaMn(kDa)bMw(kDa) Dispersity, Ðb(after end group (with end group) (final) b (final) removal) (final) PSS-11kDa PSS-13kDa 7.5 10.8 1.45 PSS-20kDa PSS-30kDa 13.0 20.4 1.57 PSS-65kDa PSS-223kDa 26.7 64.6 2.42aExample for PSS-11kDa of the naming convention used in this article: 11 kDa refers to 11 kg mol−1, the weight averaged molecular weight of the PSS polymer.bObtained by GPC. 1.3. Polymer Molecular Weight Characterization. A gel permeation chromatography (GPC) system (HLC-8420 GPC EcoSEC LC, Tosoh) was run on 20% methanol and 80% 0.3 M NaNO3, 0.01 M NaH2PO4 in water at 25 °C (0.8 mL min-1), using two PL Aquagel- OH Mixed-H (8 μm, 50 × 7.5) columns. The GPC system used was calibrated against narrow dispersity PSS standards (Polymer Standards Service) and was used to determine the number-average molar mass (Mn), the weight-average molar mass (Mw), and the dispersity index (Đ) of the PSS. We hereon refer to the PSS samples used for tissue experimentation by their Mw(PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa). We also characterized the same (Mn, Mw and Đ) for a CS reference standard (Chondroitin Sulfate A sodium salt, 90+% 2101715-001250 -17- purity, ThermoFisher Scientific), referred to A throughout this paper. All GPC traces are provided in the Supporting Information (FIG.3). 1.4. Cartilage Explant Harvesting.6 mm full-thickness cartilage explants were harvested from freshly sacrificed bovine (Bos taurus or cattle) metacarpal phalangeal joints (Sudlersville Meat Locker, MD) with a cylindrical biopsy punch with aseptic techniques. Animals were slaughtered for reasons unrelated to this study. Only joints without evidence of gross macroscopic defects were dissected. Explants were rinsed thoroughly with phosphate buffered saline or PBS (1X PBS, RMBio). Explants were then transferred to a standard 12-well plate (1 explant / well with 2 mL working volume) for subsequent experimentation. 1.5. Supernatant PSS Concentration Quantification. Frozen supernatant aliquots were thawed following each experiment, and PSS supernatant concentrations were quantified using UV-Vis spectroscopy on a microplate reader (FLUOstar Omega Microplate Reader, BMG Labtech) at λ = 225 nm. UV transparent 96-well plates were used (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) to reduce background absorbance at λ = 225 nm (FIG.4A). Calibration curves of each PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65 kDa) are provided in the Supporting Information (FIG.4B). 1.6. Safranin O Histological Staining. All cartilage explants were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) at 25 °C for 24 h, routinely processed for paraffin embedding, and sectioning at 4 µm thickness onto charged slides, prior to staining with Safranin O / Fast Green (Safranin O Cartilage Staining Kit, American MasterTech). Detailed tissue processing and staining protocols have been provided in the Supporting Information. To standardize staining technique, all slides were stained simultaneously along with respective contemporaneously run controls. Images of the stained slides were taken on a Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope and then batch analyzed using automated scripts in MATLAB (Mathworks). 1.7. Conditions for CS-A Diffusion at 4 °C. Cartilage explants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: 1) positive control or healthy cartilage, 2) negative control or GAG digested cartilage and 3) CS-A treated samples. Positive control samples were incubated in PBS for 4 h at 37 °C, and then in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF for tissue fixation and histological staining. These positive control samples serve as an internal Safranin O staining control. 2101715-001250 -18- Negative control samples were incubated in trypsin-EDTA (10X 0.5% trypsin- EDTA, ThermoFisher Scientific) in PBS for 3 h at 37 °C, as based on a previously described protocol for GAG digestion33,62. Samples were then incubated in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF. CS-A treated samples were incubated in 0.5% trypsin-EDTA for 3 h at 37 °C, in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and then in CS-A solution for 24 h at 4 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF. CS-A solution was prepared by dissolving 50 mg / mL of the reference CS-A standard in PBS. 1.8. Conditions for PSS Unsteady State Diffusion at 37 °C. Cartilage explants were randomly assigned to one of the eleven experimental groups listed in Table 3. Table 3. Experimental Groups for PSS Unsteady State Diffusion Experiment. Treatment Groups Control Positive, Negative PSS-11kDa 5 min PSS incubation, 15 min PSS incubation, 60 min PSS Treated incubation PSS-20kDa 5 min PSS incubation, 15 min PSS incubation, 60 min PSS Treated incubation PSS-65kDa 5 min PSS incubation, 15 min PSS incubation, 60 min PSS Treated incubation Positive control samples were incubated in PBS for 4 h at 37 °C, after which they were placed in NBF for tissue fixation and histological staining. Negative control samples were incubated in 0.5% trypsin-EDTA for 3 h at 37 °C, in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and then in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF. The PSS treated samples were first digested with 0.5% trypsin-EDTA in PBS for 3 h at 37 °C and then incubated in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C. Cartilage samples were finally incubated in the respective PSS solution (50 mg / mL PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa or PSS-65kDa in PBS) for the respective incubation time (5 min, 15 min or 60 min) at 37 °C. After PSS incubation, cartilage explants were immediately fixed in NBF. 1.9. Conditions for PSS Static Desorption at 4 °C. Cartilage explants were randomly assigned to one of five experimental groups: 1) positive control or healthy cartilage, 2) negative control or GAG digested cartilage, 3) PSS-11kDa treated samples, 4) PSS- 20kDa treated samples and 5) PSS-65kDa treated samples. Positive control samples were incubated in PBS for 4 h at 37 °C, and then in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF for tissue fixation and histological 2101715-001250 -19- staining. Negative control samples were in 0.5% trypsin-EDTA for 3 h at 37 °C, in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and then in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF. PSS treated samples (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) were first incubated in 0.5% trypsin-EDTA in PBS for 3 h at 37 °C, in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and then in the respective PSS solution (50 mg / mL PSS in PBS) for 24 h at 4 °C. The PSS treated samples were finally incubated in four subsequent 24 h PBS rinses. Aliquots of supernatant (2 mL) were removed every 24 h and frozen at – 20 °C for later UV-Vis spectroscopy quantification, and the bathing solution was replaced with fresh PBS every day. Parallelly, PSS treated explants were removed at Days 0 and 4, and then fixed in NBF. 1.10. Conditions for PSS-65kDa Desorption Under Loading at 25 °C.6 mm full- thickness cartilage explants were harvested aseptically, using a cylindrical biopsy punch, from freshly sacrificed bovine (Bubalus bubalis or water buffalo) metacarpal phalangeal joints (Sudlersville Meat Locker, MD). Water buffalo was used due to joint availability, however controls were appropriately used for comparison between groups within the experiment. Animals were slaughtered for reasons unrelated to this study. Only joints without gross macroscopic defects were dissected. Explant thicknesses were then measured using a caliper. Explants were then rinsed well with PBS immediately after harvest and transferred to a standard 12-well plate (1 explant / well with 2 mL working volume). Cartilage explants were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups: 1) positive control or healthy cartilage, 2) negative control or GAG digested cartilage, 3) PSS-65kDa treated samples that were not loaded, and 4) PSS-65kDa treated samples that were loaded. Positive control explants were incubated in PBS for 4 h at 37 °C, and then in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF for tissue fixation and histological staining. Negative control samples were incubated in 0.5% trypsin-EDTA for 3 h at 37 °C, in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and then in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C, after which they were fixed in NBF. PSS-65kDa treated samples were first incubated in 0.5% trypsin-EDTA in PBS for 3 h at 37 °C, in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and then in PSS solution (50 mg / mL PSS-65kDa in PBS) for 24 h at 4 °C. Following PSS-65kDa diffusion, loaded samples were placed with the superficial side facing up and underwent 5, 15, 30 and 60 unconfined compression cycles with a target force of approximately 3 N compression was performed on a custom mechanical setup, where the indentor was fixed with a linear motor (Newmark Systems Inc.) and a sensitive 2101715-001250 -20- force sensor (FUTEK, 250 g). Additionally, was fitted with a 3D-printed indentor tip with a square cross section (10 mm × 10 mm). Aliquots of supernatant (2 mL) were removed after every loading period (5, 15, 30 and 60 cycles) and frozen at – 20 °C for later UV-Vis spectroscopy quantification, and the bathing solution was replaced with fresh PBS. Parallelly, the unloaded group underwent static desorption for the same duration of time as the loaded samples and similarly, aliquots of supernatant (2 mL) were removed and frozen at – 20 °C for later UV-Vis spectroscopy quantification. All PSS-65kDa treated cartilage explants (both loaded and not loaded) were removed following the experiment, and then fixed in NBF. 3.11. Polymer SAXS Characterization. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements were performed at the LiX (16-ID) beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source NSLS-II, Brookhaven National Laboratory (New York, US). Two detectors, Pilaturs3X 1M and Pilatuds3X 900K were placed with sample-to-detector distances of 3.566m and 0.315m, respectively. The combination of the two detectors covered a scattering range of q from around 0.007 A−1to 2 A−1. Sample solutions were prepared with a concentration of 50 mg / mL in 1X PBS (CS-A, PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) and loaded into an 8-cell flat window holder. All the samples were measured with an acquisition time of 1 second per frame for a total of 20 frames on different spots of the sample cell. The scattering of the empty cells and cells filled with PBS were also measured to be used for background subtraction. Background subtraction and averaging of the data were performed using JupyterHub, which was provided by Brookhaven National Laboratory. 3.12. Safranin O – Polyanion Complex Absorption Spectra. Standard solutions of CS-A, PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa were prepared by dissolving the respective polyanions in DI water at the following concentrations: 0 mg / mL (DI water only), 0.001 mg / mL, 0.01 mg / mL, 0.1 mg / mL, 1 mg / mL and 10 mg / mL. A 1:200 Safranin O solution was prepared by diluting Safranin O stock solution (Safranin O Cartilage Staining Kit, American MasterTech) with DI water to ensure the absorbance spectrum remains below 1, as shown in the Supporting Information (FIG.5). In a flat-bottom polystyrene 96-well plate, 50 µL of each standard was mixed with 100 µL of the 1:200 Safranin O solution and absorbance spectrums were captured from 400 nm to 600 nm using a microplate reader 2101715-001250 -21- (FLUOstar Omega Microplate Reader, after 1 min of shaking. Each standard concentration was run as a triplicate within each group. 1.13. Statistical Analysis. All statistical analyses was performed with the JMP Pro 16 software (JMP Statistical Discovery LLC). Statistical significance was determined using non-parametric tests or parametric tests (after confirmation of normality and homogeneity of variance) and the specific statistical tests used are specified throughout. 2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2.1. Characterizing Polymer Molecular Weights. A summary of molecular weight characterization of the polymers is shown in Table 4. While PSS-65kDa has a similar Mw as CS-A, it has a larger Đ than CS-A, which instead has a Đ more comparable to that of PSS-11kDa and PSS-20kDa. Table 4. Polymer Molecular Weight and Dispersity. Polymer Mw (kDa) Mn (kDa) Ð = Mw / Mn CS-A 60.7 41.7 1.5 PSS-11kDa 10.8 7.5 1.5 PSS-20kDa 20.4 13.0 1.6 PSS-65kDa 64.6 26.7 2.4 Porcine CS 13.7 – 18.7 9.0 – 13.0 1.35 – 1.65 Bovine CS 20.0 – 26.0 10.0 – 15.0 1.80 – 2.20 Shark CS 64.2 – 70.2 20.5 – 26.0 2.50 – 3.10 Example for PSS-11kDa of the naming convention used in this article: 11 kDa refers to 11 kg mol−1, the weight average molecular weight of the PSSNa polymer. Bolded polymers indicate compounds tested in this study. Biologically-derived CS has molecular weights in the range of 50-100 kDa in vivo, however after the extraction and purification process, the molecular weights of CS can drastically vary depending on the animal source the CS is sourced from. For example, Volpi and co-workers found that commercially available CS preparations (sourced from porcine, chicken, bovine, shark and skate) had Mwranging from approximately 10 kDa – 70 kDa. This range from biologically-derived sources is covered by our CS-A reference and our PSS variants (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa). Another important parameter in characterizing the molecular mass is the dispersity (Đ). Volpi and co-workers found that Đ 2101715-001250 -22- ranged from 1.35 – 1.65 in porcine CS, from – 2.20 in bovine CS, and from 2.50 – 3.10 in shark CS (Table 4), which are the three main animal sources of commercial CS preparations. Hence, PSS-11kDa and PSS-20kDa have comparable overall mass parameters (Mn, Mwand Đ) to bovine and porcine CS while PSS-65kDa is comparable to shark CS samples. We note that the CS-A reference standard we used here is highly purified chondroitin sulfate A (90+% purity, ThermoFisher Scientific), since most commercial CS mixtures contain large amounts of other contaminants like dermatan sulfate. We specifically chose to use chondroitin sulfate A since it is the predominant structural form in isolated CS. Chondroitin sulfate A consists of a disaccharide unit, mono-sulfated at the 4thposition of the N-acetyl-D-galactosamine. The structures of CS-A and PSS are provided for comparison in FIG.6. 2.2. CS-A Diffusion at 4 °C in Cartilage as a Reference. To visualize the spatial distribution of supplemental CS-A within the cartilage explants, we utilized Safranin O, an established histochemical stain used in musculoskeletal research to quantitatively stain for the presence of polyanionic content in cartilage tissue. More specifically, Safranin O itself is a cationic dye that preferentially binds with anionic groups present on native sulfated GAGs in cartilage with minimal off-target binding to collagen. Safranin O is used in conjunction with the counterstain Fast Green, such that blue staining by Fast Green traditionally indicates GAG negative areas and purple-to-red staining by Safranin O traditionally indicates GAG positive areas. Full thickness cartilage explants were subjected to a trypsin digestion (or PBS in the case of the positive control group) to digest all proteoglycans from the tissue, after which explants were subjected to a 50 mg / mL CS-A diffusion at 4 °C (or PBS alone in the case of the controls) for 24 h (FIG.7A, full experimental conditions listed in Methods). CS-A diffusion was performed for 24 h since the in vivo clearance rate of large molecules in the synovium to the plasma is t1 / 2 = 23.6 h. CS-A diffusion was also performed at 4 °C, similar to previous studies on cartilage solute diffusion, to reduce enzymatic degradation and excess trypsin digestion during the overnight diffusion period. (Trypsin has minimal activity at low temperatures.). The common protease inhibitor cocktail (5 mM benzamidine hydrochloride (BHCl) and 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) used in cartilage studies was not used here since there is an overlap in the absorbance between PSS and BHCl at the λ = 225 nm wavelength we use to quantify PSS concentrations in supernatant (FIG.4, insert). 2101715-001250 -23- As a result, we chose to lower the of using external protease inhibitors, to reduce background enzymatic activity. CS-A diffusion was also performed at 4 °C, in alignment with previous cartilage explant studies, which showed that 50 mg / mL CS diffusion at 4 °C for 24 h failed to improve fluid load support in GAG depleted cartilage. Following CS-A diffusion, cartilage explants were then fixed and stained with Safranin O after the 24 h diffusion period. The respective Safranin O staining areas were finally quantified by using an automated image processing script (FIGS.7B-C). Safranin O staining intensity is relative and staining between samples was performed with the same stain batch, concentration, and duration so that all imaging of stains could be accurately compared against the negative and positive controls within the experiment. FIG.7C shows that the trypsin digestion removed all GAG content from the tissue (negative control). While this differs from the physiological scenario during osteoarthritis where GAG loss is progressive from the superficial side in naturally occurring OA, simulating partial digestion of proteoglycans using enzymes like trypsin can be highly variable. This variability in GAG digestion would negatively impact our goals for establishing diffusive and kinetic properties of the polyanions we test here (e.g. CS-A). Furthermore, variations in native GAG concentrations have been shown to have a significant effect on charged solute diffusion in cartilage due to electrostatic interactions with the tissue. Thus, we opted for complete proteoglycan digestion. This also further simplifies tracking of the absorbed polyanions through the cartilage explant sample since Safranin O does not exhibit any specificity against the native GAG versus externally introduced polyanions (e.g. CS-A). Overall, FIG.7 shows that the CS-A treated samples resulted in insignificant Safranin O staining and is comparable to that of the negative control group which had complete removal of GAGs. A repeat of the experiment on a separate dissection day demonstrates comparable results (FIG.8). It is likely that CS did not diffuse significantly enough into the tissue to properly integrate within the tissue and be captured by the Safranin O staining or it diffused out too quickly during solution exchanges from routine histology processing steps. Regardless, our experiments with CS support findings that CS may not provide effective therapeutic benefit in cartilage, at least for the purpose of restoring osmotic responsiveness or load support in GAG depleted cartilage. Similar conclusions were reached by Katta et al. who found no osmotic and fluid load support benefit from CS 2101715-001250 -24- to cartilage. In addition, Bian et al. found for some CS mechanical benefit, but only at exceeding high concentration of 100 mg / mL, which caused other adverse effects. However, these previous studies had not performed Safranin O staining after CS treatment to indicate spatial distribution of supplemental charge in the bulk matrix, as we perform here. Our Safranin O stains (FIG.7) explain the lack of mechanical efficacy administered by a CS treatment. 2.3. PSS Diffusion at 37 °C and Determination of Diffusion Coefficients. We determined effective diffusion coefficients for PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS- 65kDa) through an unsteady state diffusion experiment. Full thickness cartilage explants were subjected to a trypsin digestion, after which explants were subjected to 50 mg / mL PSS diffusion at 37 °C for either 5 min, 15 min or 60 min (FIG.9A). Diffusion was performed at 37 °C so we could determine diffusion coefficients based on molecular kinetics at physiological conditions. Negative and positive controls were exposed to PBS alone for 60 min. Explants were then fixed and stained with Safranin O before the PSS diffusion period for the control groups or immediately after each diffusion timepoint for the PSS treated samples. Cartilage is known to be anisotropic, and histology was performed in an orientation that allowed for examination of the superficial zone through deep layers of cartilage so that PSS zone-dependent diffusion coefficients could be determined. While Safranin O has not been established to bind to PSS before in histochemical tissue staining, we expected and confirm here that the cationic stain would be broadly applicable to polyanions like PSS. We quantified the respective Safranin O staining areas using an automated image processing script (FIG.9B) in MATLAB, based on a previously used procedure. All three PSS diffused rapidly through the tissue at 37 °C and within 60 min, provided at least 50% area coverage. Nonspecific electrostatic interactions here drive weak and reversible binding of the charged PSS molecules within cartilage and as a result, charged solutes will continue to diffuse throughout the full thickness of the tissue while still exhibiting high tissue residence times. This can be seen from FIG.9B where more PSS (for PSS-11kDa, PSS- 20kDa and PSS-65kDa) saturates the tissue as the diffusion time is increased. Furthermore, the Safranin O photomicrographs demonstrate that the PSS treatments, unlike CS-A, result in positive staining for polyanionic content within the explants even after the solution exchanges that occur during routine histological processing steps. 2101715-001250 -25- Effective diffusion coefficients for PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS- 65kDa) were then calculated from the overall staining intensities of the Safranin O photomicrographs at t = 5 min (FIGS.9C-D). This is justifiable because Safranin O broadly binds to polyanions in an orthochromatic form on permanently mounted histological tissue sections and as a result, the staining intensity should be proportional or stoichiometric to the polyanionic concentration within the tissue. As such, the Safranin O staining intensities were fit to the solution of Fick’s second law for a semi-infinite medium to calculate for the respective diffusion coefficents: ^^ ^^^^ଶ ^^^^ ^^= ^^^^ ^^ଶEqn. (1)(2)Where D is the any time, t, and depth, x. within the tissue is zero, and that the boundary is kept at a constant concentration Cs. An example image analysis for obtaining diffusion profiles is given in the Supporting Information (FIG. 10). It is important to note that the diffusion coefficients are effective diffusion coefficients since there may be some loss of the PSS during the routine histological steps. However, calculation of effective solute diffusion coefficients after tissue explant embedding and sectioning has been previously reported for fluorescently labelled solute transport in cartilage. The Safranin O stains demonstrate that PSS-20kDa diffuses faster than PSS-11kDa and PSS-65kDa from both the superficial zone (SZ) and deep zone (DZ) sides, we note, however, that this difference is only statistically significant in the SZ, but a similar trend does seem to occur in the DZ as well. This is an interesting result, since it has been generally shown that diffusivity is inversely proportional to the solute size. However, much of cartilage solute transport has been studied on spherical solutes or neutral polymers (such as dextrans), and such a relationship has been primarily seen in the more ideal diffusion mechanics of spherical solutes. While a similar trend may exist in linear solutes, the correlation between size and diffusivity is far weaker, most probably due to the tortuous nature of the tissue and the flexibility of the solutes. Previous work on the transport of large flexible polyelectrolytes, specifically polyanionic molecules, in cartilage remains very 2101715-001250 -26- limited and there is a significant need to similar transport phenomena of such charged solutes. Furthermore, the Safranin O stains and Table 5 demonstrate zonal dependence of the diffusion coefficients for all three PSS. It is well known that larger solutes exhibit nonuniform diffusion profiles in cartilage and the local transport kinetics are a function of the tissue zone. More specifically, Leddy et al. has shown that middle sized dextrans (40 kDa and 70 kDa) diffuse faster in the DZ compared to the SZ, whereas Torzilli et al. has shown that removal of the SZ decreases diffusion of 10 kDa dextran indicating the zonal preference towards the SZ. It is believed that these size zonal thresholds are a function of the innate structure of the cartilage (e.g. the collagen fibril orientation and zonal based compositional concentrations of the collagens versus proteoglycans). On the other hand, investigations into the interaction of large polyanionic solutes with the cartilage anisotropic structure remain limited. Here, all three PSS diffused faster from the DZ in as compared to the SZ in. This diffusion is most probably enhanced due to the complete digestion of the native proteoglycans through the trypsin digestion we performed, as it has been previously found that proteoglycan removal increases the diffusion coefficient of similarly sized dextrans. The DZ specifically has a large proteoglycan concentration in healthy cartilage. While the respective SZ and DZ diffusion coefficients for each of the three molecular weights were not found to be statistically different from each other, it has been shown previously that transient solute diffusion coefficients in cartilage can be highly variable. Table 5. Average Zonal-Based Effective Diffusion Coefficients for PSS Polymer Deff (µm2 / s) from Superficial Zone Deff (µm2 / s) from Deep Zone PSS-11kDa 0.24 ± 0.11 µm2 / s 4.74 ± 2.04 µm2 / s PSS-20kDa 6.35 ± 2.37 µm2 / s 20.22 ± 9.43 µm2 / s PSS-65kDa 1.20 ± 0.42 µm2 / s 3.41 ± 1.06 µm2 / s Diffusion coefficients calculated from image analysis of Safranin-O staining (Figure 3C & D). Errors indicate standard error of the mean. n = 10 images taken over 2 explants per group. 2.4. PSS Desorption from Cartilage Under Static Conditions at 4 °C. We measured solute retention for the three PSS formulations (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) over a four-day period. Full thickness cartilage explants were subjected to a trypsin digestion (or PBS in the case of the positive control group), after which explants were subjected to 50 mg / mL PSS diffusion at 4 °C for 24 h (or PBS alone in the case of the 2101715-001250 -27- negative and positive controls). PSS treated were then placed in a PBS desorption bath for four days, where the solution was removed, saved and refreshed every 24 h (FIG. 11A). Explants were incubated at 4 °C to compare diffusion results against the performance of CS-A (Fig.7) and to prevent background enzymatic activity that could affect solute kinetics in the tissue over the entire experimental timeline. In parallel, explants were fixed and stained with Safranin O on Day 0 and Day 4 (FIG.11B). The Safranin O stains in FIG.11B demonstrate that a considerable portion of the PSS-65kDa that diffused into the tissue was still able to remain in the tissue even after the four 24 h PBS washes. These results demonstrate that PSS-65kDa is likely better at restoring fixed charge density over several days in GAG-depleted cartilage compared to the CS-A treatment (from FIG.7). The PSS-11kDa and PSS-20kDa that had diffused into the tissue on Day 0 were not significantly retained by the four-day period based on the Safranin O staining. We also quantified the amount of PSS that diffused out of the tissue into the supernatant during every 24 h wash using UV-Vis spectroscopy (FIG.11). PSS has been shown to have a maximum absorbance peak around λ = 225 nm from its absorbance spectra. PSS calibration curves for all three PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) are provided in FIG.4B and indicate linearity. Based on this, PSS concentrations were quantified at λ = 225 nm and subsequently, the total mass losses over the entire four-day period were calculated. Mass loss was able to be determined because we had a volume of 2 mL per well at all points. From FIG.11C, there is diffusion of PSS from the explants during the desorption experiment. This solute loss is largest during Day 0-1 and decreases exponentially over each 24 h PBS rinse. However, the overall total PSS mass losses for the entire four-day period were not statistically different from each other over the three different polymer molecular weights (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa). 2.5. PSS-65kDa Desorption from Cartilage Under Loading at 25 °C. We measured the desorption of PSS-65kDa under unconfined compression loading. PSS-65kDa was chosen since this molecular weight had been shown to retain within the cartilage matrix for the longest duration out of the three PSS sizes tested (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS- 65kDa) (FIG.11B). In a grayscale image, the addition of PSS is indicated by a darker shade, as compared to the lighter negative control, as the dark positive control. Full thickness cartilage explants were subjected to a trypsin digestion (or PBS in the case of the 2101715-001250 -28- positive control group), after which explants subjected to 50 mg / mL PSS diffusion at 4 °C for 24 h (or PBS alone in the case of the controls). PSS treated explants were then assigned to two groups: one that underwent loading and the other that underwent static desorption for the same timeframe at 25 °C for a comparison. The not loaded samples serve as an internal control group for this experiment demonstrating PSS loss under static desorption since the loaded and not loaded samples were kept in the PBS bath for the same duration. Loaded samples were subjected to 5, 15, 30 and then 60 compression cycles in a PBS desorption bath, where the solution was removed, saved for analysis, and then refreshed upon every loading period (FIG.12A). Loading was standardized at a target compression force of approximately 3 N (or ~ 100 kPa) (FIG.13), in accordance with previous literature to simulate disruption of the superficial zone characteristic of early stage OA. Loading was performed with an indenter tip which had a square cross section (10 mm × 10 mm) to ensure complete coverage over the 6 mm diameter explants. While it is common to load osteochondral plugs (full thickness cartilage with the subchondral bone attached), we found that trypsin digestion of osteochondral plugs resulted in significant background absorbance at λ = 225 nm, which would bias subsequent PSS quantification of the supernatant (FIG.14). As a result, we loaded full thickness cartilage biopsies (harvested without the subchondral bone) and the average tissue thickness of the loaded samples was found to be reasonably uniform (0.66 ± 0.01 mm), as measured with a caliper. In parallel, PSS treated explants control group (without load) underwent static desorption for the same durations as the loaded samples, and the corresponding solutions were also removed, saved for analysis, and refreshed. Explants were fixed and stained before the loading phase for the control groups or after the loading duration for all the PSS treated samples. We quantified the respective Safranin O staining areas using the same automated image processing script (FIG.12B) as in earlier sections. The results demonstrate that while Safranin O staining area is significantly larger in the PSS treated samples when compared to the negative control group, there is no significant difference in staining areas between the loaded and not loaded samples. This demonstrates that the initial disruption of the superficial collagen network does not result in significant loss of the PSS-65kDa, which instead is able to retain within the matrix, likely due to its electrostatic properties or physical adhesion and entanglement. This outcome is further supported by studies that have shown that trypsin digestion does not change or damage the collagen network. We also 2101715-001250 -29- quantified the amount of PSS that diffused the tissue into the supernatant during every 24 h wash using UV-Vis spectroscopy (FIG.12 C). These results demonstrate similar trends in that there is not a significant difference between PSS loss between loaded and not loaded samples. Instead, PSS mass loss was comparable between the loaded and not loaded samples and the largest solute loss occurred during the first 5 cycle loading duration. This suggests that retention of PSS is driven by comparatively strong molecular interactions which override effects from external mechanical loading. Corresponding Safranin O stains also indicate that some PSS-65kDa remains within the tissue upon static desorption and upon loading (FIG.12D). In a grayscale figure, the presence of PSS is indicated by the regions with a darker shade, in comparison to the negative control. While the compressive stresses tested here (~ 100 kPa) are lower than physiological contact stresses incurred in vivo during light to moderate activities (1 – 6 MPa), 100 kPa or 0.1 MPa (as we have performed here) is a commonly used contact stress in loading experiments for cartilage explant studies. Since we are using full-thickness cartilage explants without the underlying subchondral bone and surrounding tissue, the associated strains might actually be quite similar or even higher than those experienced in vivo. Nevertheless, our results suggest that some PSS is likely to remain within the cartilage matrix even after compressive loading at stresses characteristic of superficial zone collagen damage and early stage OA cartilage matrix softening. 2.6. Polymer Conformation Characterization. Our running hypothesis is that PSS diffuses better into the tissue matrix than CS-A due to the improved compact nature of the PSS polymer. To compare the conformations of CS-A versus the three PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa), we used solution-based small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). Solutions of CS-A and PSS were prepared at 50 mg / mL in 1X PBS, in line with previous tissue experiments in FIGS.7, 9, 11 and 12. FIG.15 shows the scattering intensities (I(q)) of the polymers plotted against the scattering vector (q). The low-q regions reveal that there are deviations from the linear Guinier fit due to inter-particle interactions (FIG.16) and as a result, we were unable to calculate the radius of gyration, Rg, from the Guinier model. However, these deviations from nonlinearity are most probably a result of the high dispersities of the well-dissolved polymers and due to the concentration effects from the high solution concentrations used here (50 mg / mL). 2101715-001250 -30- We used the SAXS curves to compare the compactness of the polymer chains. The curves were first fitted with the Porod law as follows: ^^ ∝ ^^ି^Eqn. (3) where I is the scattering intensity, q is the scattering vector, and D is the Porod exponent or the mass fractal of the polymer chain. Linearization of Eqn. (3) and slope extraction of the regression fits have been presented in FIG.17 and show strong linearity. Curve fits with the Porod law in Fig.15 demonstrate that DPSS= 3.4 (for all three PSS molecular weights) and DCS-A = 1.7. In the case of polymers, the Porod exponent is the inverse of the Flory exponent and as such, D = 3.4 indicates a compact polymer system whereas D = 1.7 indicates a swollen, extended polymer chain. The results show that PSS assumes a more compact structure in solution than CS-A does at the concentration of 50 mg / mL tested. This is further supported by the Kratky plots of the SAXS curves, as provided in FIG.18, which show that PSS solutions demonstrate a compact partially-folded conformation, whereas the CS-A assumes a swollen chain conformation in solution. These results are in accordance with literature which show that CS exhibits a semi-rigid extended coil conformation with a persistence length on the order of 14 – 21 nm, translating to the increased stiffness present in aggrecan. 2.7. Safranin O – PSS Absorption Spectra. To qualitatively compare the binding of the polyanions we tested here (e.g., CS-A and PSS) with Safranin O, and to develop a colorimetric standard of stain color with PSS concentration, we measured the absorbance spectra of resulting dye – polyanion complexes in solution. We prepared a series of standard solution concentrations of CS-A and PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) in DI water and captured the absorption spectrums of the Safranin O dye – polyanion complexes using UV-Vis (FIG.19). Stock Safranin O stain was diluted by 1:200 using DI water to ensure that absorbance readings were in the working range of the microplate reader. From FIG.19, the 0 mg / mL (no added polyelectrolyte) absorption line demonstrates that the Safranin O dye has a maximum absorbance peak at λ = 519 nm, which aligns with previous studies. This peak, which occurs at λ = 519 nm, is referred to as the orthochromatic peak and describes the color of the dye. Addition of CS-A and the three PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) to the dye solution first results in a depression of the orthochromatic (color intensity) absorbance maximum at polyanion concentrations of 0.001 2101715-001250 -31- mg / mL and 0.01 mg / mL as seen in FIG.19. molecular level, this occurs due to adsorption of the cationic dye on the polyanions, occurring primarily through electrostatic interactions. However, the changes in absorbance between the polyanions at each concentration were found to be not statistically significant from each other (Table 6). Table 6. Average absorption maximums in the orthochromatic region (λ = 519 nm) Dye Alone 0.706 ± 0.036 Concentration CS-A PSS-11kDaaPSS-20kDaaPSS-65kDaa0.001 mg / mL 0.652 ± 0.005 0.684 ± 0.011 (n.s.) 0.689 ± 0.009 (n.s.) 0.665 ± 0.015 (n.s.) 0.01 mg / mL 0.569 ± 0.002 0.607 ± 0.008 (n.s.) 0.585 ± 0.012 (n.s.) 0.571 ± 0.015 (n.s.) n = 3 wells. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.aStatistical significance compared against CS-A as determined with a Dunnett’s pairwise comparisons test (ns = not significant). When the concentrations exceeded 0.01 mg / mL, there were appearances of metachromatic (color shift) absorbance peaks, as seen in FIG.19. These color shifts occur due to dye – dye interactions between neighboring dye molecules bound to the polyanion from forced stacking of dye molecules along the molecular chain of the polyelectrolyte, thus inducing solution color change. As a result, the ability of a polyanion to induce metachromasia is directly related to the inter-charge distance of that polyanion. From FIG. 19, it can be clearly seen that the wavelength shifts are more rapid with changes in concentration (e.g., occur at lower concentrations) with PSS as compared to with CS-A. For example, the metachromatic peak that occurs at λ ~ 507 nm for 1 mg / mL PSS (PSS-11kDa, PSS-20kDa and PSS-65kDa) does not occur until 10 mg / mL CS-A. Wavelengths of each of the metachromatic absorbance peaks have been quantified in Table 7, and it was found that the wavelength shifts between CS-A and each PSS were statistically different from each other at each concentration (0.1 mg / mL, 1 mg / mL and 10 mg / mL). Table S3. Average wavelengths (λ) of absorption maximums in the metachromatic region Concentration CS-A PSS-11kDa PSS-20kDa PSS-65kDa 0.1 mg / mL 473.3 nm ± 0.3 498.0 nm ± 0.0 (****) 498.0 nm ± 0.6 (****) 500.7 nm ± 0.9 (****) 1 mg / mL 490.0 nm ± 2.5 506.7 nm ± 0.3 (****) 507.7 nm ± 0.3 (****) 508.7 nm ± 0.3 (****) 10 mg / mL 507.7 nm ± 0.7 534.0 nm ± 0.0 (****) 534.0 nm ± 0.0 (****) 534.0 nm ± 0.0 (****) n = 3 wells. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.aStatistical significance compared against CS-A as determined with a Dunnett’s pairwise comparisons test (**** p < 0.0001). The more rapid metachromatic shifts per concentration from PSS over CS-A indicates that PSS likely has a smaller inter-charge distance than CS-A. Combining these 2101715-001250 -32- results with the SAXS conformation demonstrates that PSS assumes a more compact conformation in solution than CS-A and, as a result, has a higher charge density as compared to CS-A. This structure of PSS is advantageous since the compact nature and increased charge density allows it to freely diffuse into and concentrate within the bulk matrix to provide supplemental negative charge to the porous bulk matrix of GAG depleted cartilage as compared to CS-A does. 3. CONCLUSIONS There is a critical need for GAG and proteoglycan analogues that help restore osmotic responsiveness in OA cartilage and rebuild impaired load-bearing tissue function via tissue hydration. Here, we demonstrated that PSS can be used to synthetically replace lost negative charge in cartilage (with complete GAG loss) as well as can be used to probe polyelectrolyte transport in cartilage. Effective diffusion coefficients of three different molecular weights of PSS (11kDa, 20kDa, and 65kDa) were determined through image analysis of Safranin O staining. It was found that PSS diffused faster from the deep zone side in than from the superficial zone side, regardless of the molecular weight of the PSS. Furthermore, PSS treated samples were able to retain a considerable amount of the supplemental charge even after 4 days and upon loading. In contrast, CS-A treated samples displayed little to no positive Safranin O staining and restoration of negative charge even on Day 0 of treatment. We hypothesize that this improved solute retention exhibited by PSS over CS-A is due to the greater compactness and improved charge density of the PSS chain, as determined through solution-based SAXS. This conformation advantage helps the polyelectrolyte diffuse better into the tissue and possess a better binding capacity with the matrix, improving charge delivery and solute performance. Future work may include tracking polyelectrolyte diffusion kinetics through non-Newtonian solution baths (since synovial fluid is non-Newtonian in nature). Size dependent diffusion of polyanionic molecules can also be further investigated by tracking the diffusion of various polyelectrolytes though molecular labelling techniques. More broadly, our results open avenues to using PSS functionalized proteoglycan replacements for restoring fixed charge density in GAG-depleted cartilage and could also be translated to similar hydrated tissue systems such as fibrocartilage and corneal tissue. 2101715-001250 -33- Example 2. PSS-PNiPAm enhances retention and remains within explants for at least 5 days Preliminary data shows that PSS- b-PNiPAm successfully retains within cartilage explants at least 5 days (the longest duration we have tested so far—longer periods are difficult ex vivo due to auto-degradation and contamination of explants held at 37° C). In contrast, PSS without PNiPAm mostly diffuses out within 5 days. (FIG.20), as evidenced in a grayscale image by the darker shade present in the Day 5 comparison between PSS-b- PNIPAM and not in PSS. Here, full thickness bovine cartilage explants with bone removed were subjected to a full proteoglycan digestion using trypsin. (Full digestion is not expected physiologically but enables consistency and better visualization of PSS-PNiPAm content.) Following proteoglycan digestion, explants were incubated in either 10 mg / mL PSS-b- PNiPAm or 10 mg / mL PSS for 36 h at below 37°C, after which they were then incubated at 37°C for 2 h to promote thermal gelation (micelle formation occurs within minutes). Following treatment, the explants underwent five full PBS washes every 24 h, and the PBS supernatant was analyzed by UV-Vis to quantify how much PSS leeched out of the tissue (FIG.20, bottom). Explants were then fixed and stained with SafO with standard methods, but temperatures were kept at 37°C for 2 h during fixation. While PSS-b-PNiPAm appears to diffuse further inside the tissue at Day 5, this might be because the pore size is sufficient large in the middle zone so the PSS-b-PNiPAm micelles can further diffuse into the tissue, but not out. This effect will be likely less pronounced in cartilage that has not been fully GAG digested due to electrostatic repulsion. UV-vis quantification confirms that PSS- PNiPAm has significantly lower loss on Day 1 than PSS. The evolution of PSS-PNiPAm over five days show directions for the work in this grant: there is some loss on the later days, but the consistent amount of on Days 3-5 suggests compound loss may not be simple diffusion like in PSS because diffusion-based loss in PSS follows an exponential fit. Example 3. PSS treatment significantly restores permeability in digested cartilage. From creep indentation experiments, we have found that PSS treatment restores 90.1% of the permeability in explants that have been enzymatically digested to remove GAG content (FIG.21), which is statistically not distinct from the healthy control. Permeability, κ, is a key measure of fixed charge density, i.e., the property we are intending to restore. Bovine osteochondral explants with bone attached were digested with 0.25% trypsin for 4 h to ensure a partial digestion of superficial GAG content (healthy control 2101715-001250 -34- explants were incubated in media alone period). Following GAG digestion, explants were then incubated in media (control groups) or 50 mg / mL PSS (treated group) for 12 h at 4°C. Explants then underwent stress relaxation (20% strain for 10 min) using a custom indentation setup, fitted with a 1.59 mm spherical steel indentor tip, in our lab to extract equilibrium parameters. As demonstrated by (FIG.21), PSS significantly improves the permeability of cartilage with GAG loss, and we believe that PSS-PNiPAm will retain this improvement over long durations. As expected, other derived measures like the equilibrium modulus and tensile modulus showed modest improvements (35.2%, 17.5%) indicating that our compound is targeting fixed charge density and proteoglycan function as expected. (Though not the focus here, combined approaches with existing work to restore all mechanical properties to nearly their undamaged form would be a future direction). Example 4. PSS is expected to be biocompatible from routine lactate dehydrogenase, cell viability by Live / Dead staining, and mRNA expression in isolated cell culture. The supporting data from these experiments is by a lack of significant increase of lactate dehydrogenase at a series of concentrations of PSS. There is also a lack of unusual increase of dead cells by Live / Dead staining. In mRNA, a lack of significant upregulation of osteoarthritis biomarkers like Col 2 or downregulation of aggrecan. Example 5. Synthesis of PSS-block-PNIPAM Materials. Diethyl ether, carbon disulfide, sodium thiomethoxide, ethyl acetate, ɑ- Bromophenylacetic acid, hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride, n-hexane, 4,4'-Azobis(4- cyanopentanoic acid) (ACVA) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. Sodium styrene sulfonate (NaSS) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and recrystallized from ethanol / water. N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and recrystallized from n-hexane. Distilled water filtered using a Milli-Q purification system was used throughout. Synthesis of α-Methyl trithiocarbonate-S-phenylacetic Acid (Chain transfer agent, CTA). α-Methyl trithiocarbonate-S-phenylacetic Acid was synthesized as reported by Yusa et. al. (J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.47, 6827–6838 (2009)). Separately, 1.035g of sodium thiomethoxide was mixed with 30mL diethyl ether. The solution of carbon disulfide was added dropwise to the suspension of sodium methoxide in diethyl ether at room temperature and stirred for 2 hours. Diethyl ether was removed by decantation and evaporation to yield a yellow powder.33mL of ethyl acetate was added to the yellow 2101715-001250 -35- powder to dissolve it. The insoluble part was out. To the solution, 2.94g of α- Bromophenylacetic acid was added. The reaction mixture was heated to 70 ℃ and stirred overnight with reflux. The reaction mixture was washed thrice with 1M HCl and subsequently with saturated NaCl solution. The organic layer and aqueous layers were separated using a separating funnel. The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate and recrystallized from n-hexane / ethyl acetate to obtain α-Methyl trithiocarbonate-S- phenylacetic Acid or MTPA (yield = 600 mg). Synthesis of poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS) macro-chain transfer agent (macro-CTA). PSS was synthesized using sodium styrene sulfonate (NaSS) and α-methyl trithiocarbonate- S-phenylacetic Acid (MTPA) as the CTA for the reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. To obtain PSS with a molecular weight 20 kg mol–1, 2.06g (10 mmol) of NaSS was dissolved in 10 mL water, along with 26 mg (0.1 mmol) of MTPA and 5.6mg (0.02 mmol) of ACVA. The reaction was degassed for 30 minutes under nitrogen. The reaction proceeded for 8 hours at 70 °C to obtain PSS chain transfer agent (Scheme 3), which was characterized using NMR and GPC (Mn= 19.9 kg mol–1, yield = 1.97g, Ð = 1.27). Scheme Synthesis of PSS-block-PNIPAM. PSS-block-PNIPAM was synthesized by RAFT polymerization as shown previously by Mizusaki et. al. (Polymers (Basel).9, (2017)). PSS chain transfer agent was used to synthesize PSS-block-PNIPAM. A mixture of water / methanol (1:1 v / v) was used to control the thermo-response of the block copolymer as it was synthesized.2.26g (20mmol) of NIPAM along with 0.963g (0.05 mmol) of PSS chain-transfer agent and ACVA (5.75mg, 0.02 mmol) were dissolved in 4 ml of 1:1 water- methanol solution. The reaction mixture was degassed for 30 mins under nitrogen and heated to 50 ℃ till NIPAM was completely dissolved. Then, the reaction mixture was heated to 70 ℃ for 90 minutes or till the reaction formed a viscous gel-like mass, to yield PSS-block-PNIPAM (Scheme 4). PSS-b-PNIPAM was purified by dialysis and 2101715-001250 -36- characterized for block ratio and molecular using NMR. Gel permeation chromatography was used to confirm the formation of block copolymer and obtain and dispersity (Mn = 69.6 kg mol–1, yield = 1.8g, Ð = 1.2). resonance : were on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer (FIGS.22 and 23). the crude reaction mixtures and polymers were dissolved in D2O at a concentration of ~ 10 mg / mL. All measurements were taken at room temperature. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC): GPC was performed using a Tosoh HLC- 8420 GPC EcoSEC LC system running in 0.1% wt LiBr in 90% DMF and 10% DI water (0.8 mL min−1), using two PSS GRAM Analytical Linear (10μm, 8*300mm) columns and a refractive index detector. Number-average (Mn) and weight-average (Mw) molecular weights and dispersity (Ð) were determined by calibration against narrow dispersity polystyrene sulfonate standards (purchased from Polymer Standards Service) (FIG.24). Results from NMR and GPC are summarized in Table 8. Table 8. Synthesis of PSS and PSS-b-PNIPAM PSS:P MnM ÐbThermo- Entry Sample PSS ÐbnNIPA PSS-b-PNIPAM PSS response (kg mol–1) PSS -b- M (kg mol–1) PNIPAM mass of sample acratiobt 37 °C Theo.aMeas.bTheo.aMeas.b1 PSS - 66.9 1.36 - - - - None 2PSS176-b-26836.4 32.7 1.29 66.7 46 MicellePNIPAM.1 1.41 1:0.83formation3PSS96-b- 19.9 14.5 1.27 69.6 41.2 1. MicellePNIPAM44020 1:2.3formationaDetermined by1H NMR in D2O from monomer conversion.bDetermined by gel permeation chromatography in DMF / water buffer 90:10 calibrated against PSSNa standards using a refractive index detector.cConcentration of PSS was held constant at 10 mg mL-1. Example 6. PSS-b-PNIPAM RAFT End Group Removal via Aminolysis and Thiol- ene Click Chemistry 2101715-001250 -37- Materials.2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, and AmberLite™ HPR1200 H ion exchange resin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Spectrum™ Spectra / Por™ 3 RC Dialysis Membrane Tubing 3500 Dalton MWCO and ethanol were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Deionized water filtered using a Milli-Q purification system was used throughout. Procedure. Removal of the trithiocarbonate RAFT end group occurred by one-pot aminolysis and thiol-ene click reaction3–7as follows. PSS176-b-PNIPAM268(1 g, 0.015 mmol) and 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (52 µL, 0.45 mmol) were added to a 100 mL single-neck round-bottomed flask and dissolved in 50 mL water. The reaction was sealed with rubber septa and sparged with nitrogen gas while stirring for 45 minutes. N-butylamine (27 µL, 0.37 mmol) was added by needle through the septa, and the reaction continued to sparge for 45 more minutes before being sealed. PSS96-b-PNIPAM440 (2 g, 0.029 mmol) and 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (0.1 mL, 0.86 mmol) were added to a 250 mL single-neck round-bottomed flask and dissolved in 100 mL water. The reaction was sealed with rubber septa and sparged with nitrogen gas while stirring for 45 minutes. N-butylamine (52 µL, 0.72 mmol) was added by needle through the septa, and the reaction continued to sparge for 45 more minutes before being sealed. The reaction was run for a total of 8 hours at room temperature (23 °C), after which the solution was opened to the air (Scheme 5).1 mL AmberLite™ HPR1200 H ion exchange resin was added into the solution and allowed to stir for 2 hours before being filtered out over vacuum. This was repeated twice more, with new resin each time before the solution was brought to pH = 7 using 1 M NaOH. The polymer was dialyzed overnight before drying under heat and vacuum. by one-pot aminolysis and thiol-ene click reaction. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. NMR Spectroscopy was utilized to confirm the removal of the n-butylamine and 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate following stirring with acidic resin and dialysis, respectively.1H NMR spectra were obtained using Bruker 2101715-001250 -38- 600 MHz spectrometers, with all samples in D2O. All measurements were taken at room temperature. Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC). A comparison of GPCs taken before and after the aminolysis, below, shows polymers with similar molecular weights and dispersity. GPC was performed using a Tosoh HLC-8420 GPC EcoSEC LC system running in 0.1% wt LiBr in 90% DMF and 10% DI water (0.8 mL min−1), using two PSS GRAM Analytical Linear (10μm, 8*300mm) columns and a refractive index detector. Number-average (Mn) and weight-average (Mw) molecular weights and dispersity (Ð) were determined by calibration against narrow dispersity polystyrene sulfonate standards (purchased from Polymer Standards Service) (FIG.25). UV-Vis Spectroscopy. The PSS-b-PNIPAM was observed to undergo a slight color change from yellow before the trithiocarbonate RAFT chain end removal to a lighter yellow after. The color change may also be seen in the corresponding UV-Vis absorption spectra. Samples were dissolved in DI water (50 mg / mL) and the spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-3600 UV-Vis-NIR Spectrophotometer. The overlaid spectra show a generally lower absorbance of the PSS-b-PNIPAM after the trithiocarbonate RAFT end group was removed, compared to before (FIG.26). All documents, books, manuals, papers, patents, published patent applications, guides, abstracts, and / or other references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Claims
2101715-001250 -39- WHAT IS CLAIMED:
1. A method for increasing the fixed charge density in a soft tissue having a loss of native glycosaminoglycans (GAG), comprising: (a) administering to the soft tissue a synthetic polyelectrolyte to the soft tissue; (b) dissociating the synthetic polyelectrolyte into a negatively-charged polymer in the soft tissue, whereby the fixed charge density in the soft tissue is increased.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the soft tissue has a partial loss of the native GAG.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the soft tissue is a cartilage.
4. The method of any one of claims 1-3, wherein the soft tissue is in a subject.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the synthetic polyelectrolyte is administered to the subject.
6. The method of any one of claims 1-5, wherein the synthetic polyelectrolyte is poly(styrene) sulfonate (PSS).
7. The method of any one of claims 1-5, wherein the synthetic polyelectrolyte is a copolymer of poly(styrene) sulfonate (PSS) and a thermal responsive polymer, wherein the copolymer transforms reversibly from a liquid to a micelle or larger aggregate upon heating.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the thermal responsive polymer is poly(N- isopropylacrylamide) (PNiPAm) and the copolymer is PSS-PNiPAm.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the PSS-PNiPAm is PSS-b-PNiPAm.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the PSS-PNiPAm is PSS-g-PNiPAm.
11. The method of any one of claims 1-10, further comprising retaining at least 5 % of the synthetic polyelectrolyte in the soft tissue for at least 1 day.
12. The method of any one of claims 1-11, further comprising decreasing permeability in the soft tissue.