Pesticide compositions and pesticide spray products

Abstract

The present invention provides a pesticide composition that does not adversely affect beneficial organisms or the surrounding environment, while possessing high insecticidal and fungicidal effects against target pests. [Solution] The pesticide composition contains flubendiamide, flonicamide, pyraziflumid, and one or more auxiliary components, along with water.

Description

Technical Field

[0007] , ,

[0001] The present disclosure relates to a pesticide composition and a pesticide spray product.

Background Art

[0002] As pesticides for home gardening, there are known insecticides and fungicides of a type that can be sprayed as they are without the need to dilute with water during use.

[0003] For example, in Patent Document 1, an aqueous suspension formulation for home gardening containing three components, clothianidin and fenpropathrin as pesticide insecticidal components and mepanipyrim as a pesticide fungicidal component, has been proposed. Patent Document 1 shows that the aqueous suspension formulation for home gardening has an immediate insecticidal effect and a residual insecticidal effect against hemiptera pests and lepidoptera pests that are highly regarded in home gardening.

Prior Art Documents

Patent Documents

[0004]

Patent Document 1

Summary of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0005] However, in Patent Document 1, since pyrethroids and neonicotinoids are used as insecticidal components, there is a possibility of killing insects other than the target pests. In particular, it is considered that the impact on useful organisms such as honeybees is also significant.

[0006] The present disclosure has been made in view of such points, and an object thereof is to provide a pesticide composition that does not have an adverse effect on useful organisms such as honeybees and the surrounding environment, has a high insecticidal effect against target pests, and also has a bactericidal effect.

Means for Solving the Problems

[0007] To achieve the above objective, a pesticide composition according to one aspect of this disclosure contains flubendiamide, flonicamide, pyraziflumid, and one or more auxiliary components, and water.

[0008] Flubendiamide has excellent residual properties, suppressing damage for a long period. In particular, it exhibits characteristic body contraction symptoms in lepidopteran larvae that are not observed with existing insecticides.

[0009] Floricamide possesses excellent systemic and transmissible properties, effectively inhibiting the sap-sucking behavior of sap-sucking insects.

[0010] Furthermore, pyraziflumid is an SDHI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) fungicide that acts by inhibiting succinate dehydrogenase in complex II of the electron transport chain in mitochondria, and exhibits high fungicidal activity against various plant pathogens belonging to ascomycetes, basidiomycetes, and imperfect fungi.

[0011] The pesticide composition may also contain flubendiamide, flonicamide, pyraziflumid, a surfactant, and water.

[0012] The flubendiamide content can be between 0.003% by weight and 0.05% by weight. The flonicamide content can be between 0.0025% by weight and 0.02% by weight. The pyraziflumid content can be between 0.0001% by weight and 0.05% by weight. Furthermore, the pesticide composition may further contain a vitalizing component as an optional ingredient.

[0013] The pesticide composition can also be filled into a spray container, for example, to create a pesticide spray product comprising the pesticide composition and the spray container. [Effects of the Invention]

[0014] According to this embodiment, it is possible to provide a pesticide composition that does not adversely affect beneficial organisms such as honeybees or the surrounding environment, and has a high insecticidal effect against target pests, as well as a fungicidal effect. [Brief explanation of the drawing]

[0015] [Figure 1] Figure 1 is a perspective view of a pesticide spray product according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 2] Figure 2 shows the results of a spray test on honeybees. [Modes for carrying out the invention]

[0016] The embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below. The following description of preferred embodiments is essentially illustrative and is not intended to limit the present invention, its applications, or its uses.

[0017] The pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention contains flubendiamide, flonicamide, pyraziflumid, and one or more auxiliary components, and water. The pesticide composition may contain 50% by weight or more of water, and may also be called an aqueous pesticide composition.

[0018] In other words, the pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention contains flubendiamide as an active ingredient, resulting in excellent residual efficacy and long-term suppression of damage. In particular, it exhibits characteristic body contraction symptoms in lepidopteran larvae that are not observed with existing insecticides. Other diamide insecticide components will exhibit similar effects.

[0019] Furthermore, because it contains flonicamide, it has excellent systemic and penetrating properties, and flonicamide exerts an effect of inhibiting the sap-sucking behavior of sap-sucking insects.

[0020] Flubendiamide and flonicamid are insecticidal components contained in the pesticide composition according to an embodiment of the present invention, and can also be called insecticidal active ingredients. The concentration of the insecticidal component contained in the pesticide composition can be 0.0001% by weight or more and 0.05% by weight or less. The concentration of flubendiamide can be 0.003% by weight or more and 0.05% by weight or less. The concentration of flonicamid can be 0.0025% by weight or more and 0.02% by weight or less. If it is less than the lower limit value, a sufficient insecticidal effect cannot be ensured. Also, if it exceeds the upper limit value, there is a risk that the insecticidal component will remain in plants such as vegetables to which the pesticide composition is applied.

[0021] Pyraclostrobin is a SDHI (Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors) fungicide that acts on inhibiting succinate dehydrogenase of complex II in the electron transport system in mitochondria, and shows high fungicidal activity against various plant pathogens belonging to ascomycetes, basidiomycetes and imperfect fungi. However, other fungicidal components also show similar effects. The concentration of the fungicidal component acting on complex II can be 0.0001% by weight or more and 0.05% by weight or less. If it is less than the lower limit value, a sufficient fungicidal effect cannot be ensured. Also, if it exceeds the upper limit value, there is a risk that the fungicidal component will remain in plants such as vegetables to which the pesticide composition is applied.

[0022] The water contained in the pesticide composition according to an embodiment of the present invention is a solvent for the insecticidal component and the fungicidal component, and may be, for example, tap water, ion-exchanged water, purified water, groundwater, etc., or water mixed with any two or more of these.

[0023] In the pesticide composition according to an embodiment of the present invention, as a solvent for the insecticidal component and the bactericidal component, for example, any one or a mixture of any two or more of alcohols, hydrocarbon solvents, ester solvents, glycol solvents, etc. may be contained. Examples of alcohols include ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, etc., and any one or a mixture of any two or more of these can be used. Examples of hydrocarbon solvents include normal paraffin, isoparaffin, kerosene, etc., and any one or a mixture of any two or more of these can be used. Examples of ester solvents include ditridecyl phthalate, isobutyl oleate, diisobutyl adipate, diisodecyl adipate, diisononyl phthalate, didecyl phthalate, dialkyl phthalate, trinormal alkyl trimellitate, tri-2-ethylhexyl trimellitate, triisodecyl trimellitate, fatty acid methyl, methyl laurate, isopropyl myristate, isopropyl palmitate, pentaerythritol monooleate, methyl oleate, triglyceride 2-ethylhexanoate, cetyl 2-ethylhexanoate, etc., and any one or a mixture of any two or more of these can be used. Examples of glycol solvents include propylene glycol monomethyl ether (PGME), etc.

[0024] The concentration of the solvent contained in the pesticide composition according to an embodiment of the present invention can be 95% by weight or more and 99.99% by weight or less. By setting it within the above range, the insecticidal component and the bactericidal component can be sufficiently dissolved, and the stability is also excellent.

[0025] The pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention may contain a surfactant (auxiliary component) as an optional component. Examples of surfactants include anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, and amphoteric surfactants, and any one or any two or more of these can be used in combination. More specifically, examples of anionic surfactants include sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, sodium ditridecyl sulfosuccinate, sodium dialkyl sulfosuccinate, and sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate, and any one or any two or more of these can be used in combination. Examples of nonionic surfactants include polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene alkyl ether, polyoxyalkylene fatty acid ester, polyoxyalkylene alkyl ether, glycerin fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene laurylamine, polyoxyethylene stearylamine, and polyoxyethylene oleyl ether, and any one or any two or more of these can be used in combination. Examples of cationic surfactants include lauryltrimethylammonium chloride and stearyltrimethylammonium chloride, and any one of these or any two or more can be used in combination. An example of an amphoteric surfactant is lauryl betaine.

[0026] The concentration of the surfactant contained in the pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention can be 0.001% by weight or more and 5% by weight or less. If it is below the lower limit, sufficient adhesion to leaves and insect bodies cannot be ensured. If it exceeds the upper limit, there is a risk of phytotoxicity to plants.

[0027] The mixing ratio of the insecticidal component, the fungicidal component, and the surfactant contained in the pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention can be 1 / 1 / 10 to 1 / 1 / 50000. By setting the ratio within this range, the insecticidal and fungicidal effects can be sufficiently exhibited without causing phytotoxicity to plants.

[0028] Examples of the dosage forms of the pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention include liquid formulations, aerosol formulations, powder formulations, granular formulations, tablets, oil formulations, emulsion formulations, wettable powder formulations, flowable formulations, microcapsule formulations, and the like. Among these, liquid formulations are particularly preferred, and when the dosage form is a liquid formulation, it is preferable to put the pesticide composition into a spray container such as a spray bottle, bottle, or watering can and spray it.

[0029] In the case of liquid formulations, the insecticidal and fungicidal components are dissolved separately in water, then mixed while stirring, and finally other components such as preservatives are added to obtain the pesticide composition.

[0030] As shown in Figure 1, a pesticide spray product 1 using a pesticide composition according to an embodiment of the present invention can also be used. This pesticide spray product 1 comprises a pesticide composition and a spray container 10, with the pesticide composition filled into the spray container 10. The spray container 10 includes a bottle 11 that contains the pesticide composition, a spray mechanism (not shown) for spraying the pesticide composition contained in the bottle 11, a trigger 12 for operating the spray mechanism, and a nozzle 13 from which the pesticide composition is ejected. The spray container 10 shown in Figure 1 is just an example, and its shape, size, etc., are not particularly limited.

[0031] The trigger 12 of the spray container 10 is designed so that the user can place their finger on it and pull it. When the trigger 12 is pulled once, the spray mechanism pressurizes the pesticide composition in the range of 1.05 ml to 1.35 ml to the nozzle 13, and the mixture is sprayed out from the nozzle 13. After pulling the trigger 12, the trigger 12 returns to its original position when the pressure on the finger is released. By repeatedly pulling the trigger 12, the pesticide composition is sprayed continuously. When using the pesticide spray product 1, the trigger 12 may be pulled once or multiple times.

[0032] The particle size of the pesticide composition sprayed from the nozzle 13 can be arbitrarily set by, for example, the diameter and length of the nozzle 13, the spray pressure from the spraying mechanism, etc. In this embodiment, with the nozzle 13 directed to spray horizontally, the average particle size (D50) of the pesticide composition at a distance of 20 cm horizontally from the tip of the nozzle 13 is set to be in the range of 300 μm to 600 μm. For measuring the average particle size, for example, a laser diffraction particle size analyzer such as Microtrac Aerotrac LDSA-SPR 1500A (manufactured by Microtrac-Bell Co., Ltd.) can be used. The measurement was performed at a temperature of 25°C, and the 50% particle size (D50) in the volume integrated distribution was used as the average particle size. By setting it within the above range, it is less likely to scatter and more likely to adhere to plants.

[0033] Although not shown in the figures, an aerosol product using the pesticide composition according to an embodiment of the present invention can also be used. The aerosol product comprises the pesticide composition and an aerosol container, wherein the pesticide composition is filled into the aerosol container together with a propellant. The aerosol container is provided with a valve mechanism and a stem for operating the valve mechanism. An aerosol cap is also attached to the aerosol container. The aerosol cap is provided with a button for pressing the stem and a nozzle from which the pesticide composition and propellant ejected from the stem are sprayed. Examples of propellants include liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), dimethyl ether (DME), compressed gases (carbon dioxide, nitrogen, nitrous oxide), etc., and any one or any two or more of these can be used in combination.

[0034] The pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention can also be supported on a solid carrier to produce a pesticide product. Examples of solid carriers include talc, zeolite, silica, etc., and any one of these or any two or more can be used in combination. The pesticide product, in which the pesticide composition is supported on a solid carrier, can be used by placing it on the ground or elsewhere.

[0035] The pesticide composition according to the embodiment of the present invention may also contain other components (optional components). Examples of other components include acaricides, nematicides, repellents, vitalizers, biostimulants, preservatives, deodorants, thickeners, pH adjusters, fragrances, pigments, efficacy enhancers, defoamers, ultraviolet absorbers, and antioxidants. Any one or any two or more of these can be used in combination. Examples of biostimulants include alginate oligosaccharide (AO). Examples of vitalizers include amino acids, but other vitalizers may also be used.

[0036] Examples of pests (target pests) that can be controlled by the pesticide compositions according to the embodiments of the present invention include hemipteran pests and lepidopteran pests. Examples of controllable hemipteran pests include aphids, whiteflies, and citrus thrips. Examples of controllable lepidopteran pests include diamondback moths, cabbage worms, diamondback moths, tobacco budworms, loopers, beet armyworms, and caterpillars.

[0037] The pesticide compositions according to the embodiments of the present invention have little to no control effect on beneficial organisms (beneficial insects). Examples of beneficial insects that are not targeted for control by the pesticide compositions include honeybees such as European honeybees, Japanese honeybees, and bumblebees. Even if the pesticide composition is sprayed, honeybees will not be controlled.

[0038] Examples of plant diseases that can be controlled by the pesticide compositions according to the embodiments of the present invention include powdery mildew, brown spot disease, rust disease, black spot disease, and the like.

[0039] Examples of plants targeted by the pesticide compositions according to the embodiments of the present invention include tomatoes, bell peppers, cucumbers, eggplants, broccoli, Chinese cabbage, cabbage, non-heading lettuce, lettuce, bitter melon (goya), leeks, edamame, snow peas, adzuki beans, strawberries, melons, watermelons, citrus fruits, apples, grapes, pears, plums, trees, flowers, ornamental plants, and the like. By using the pesticide compositions on these plants, the pesticide compositions will exhibit pest control effects and disease prevention and treatment effects.

[0040] When using a liquid pesticide composition, a spray container 10 as shown in Figure 1 can be used. The pesticide composition is sprayed onto the leaves of plants, etc., from the spray container 10. At this time, it is preferable to spray evenly on both the upper and lower surfaces of the leaves, and the amount sprayed should be such that the sprayed liquid drips from the tips of the leaves. Specifically, for example, it is preferable to spray 7.5 mL or more of the pesticide composition on pansies. The application frequency can be, for example, once or twice every 14 days, with once every 14 days being preferable. The pesticide composition may also be sprayed from a container with a shower nozzle, from an aerosol container, or from a sprayer with an electric pump. The pesticide composition may be sprayed on leaves, stems, flower buds, etc. [Examples]

[0041] Examples and comparative examples of the present invention will be described below, but the present invention is not limited to these examples.

[0042] Example 1 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.005% by weight of flubendiamide, 0.005% by weight of flonicamide, and 0.005% by weight of pyraziflumid, with the remainder being water.

[0043] Comparative Example 1 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.005% by weight of thiamethoxam, 0.0005% by weight of emamectin benzoate, and 0.005% by weight of difenoconazole, with the remainder being water.

[0044] Comparative Example 2 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.6% by weight of reduced starch syrup, 0.008% by weight of clothianidin, 0.01% by weight of pyridaryl, 0.01% by weight of permethrin, and 0.02% by weight of mandestrobin, with the remainder being water.

[0045] Comparative Example 3 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.008% by weight of clothianidin, 0.01% by weight of fenpropathrin, and 0.02% by weight of mepanipyrim, with the remainder being water.

[0046] Comparative Example 4 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.01% by weight of dinotefuran, 0.02% by weight of etofenprox, 0.0005% by weight of milbemectin, and 0.01% by weight of penthiopyrad, with the remainder being water.

[0047] Comparative Example 5 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.008% by weight of clothianidin, 0.0025% by weight of mycrobutanil, with the remainder being water.

[0048] Comparative Example 6 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.008% by weight of clothianidin, with the remainder being water.

[0049] Comparative Example 7 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.01% by weight of fenpropathrin and 0.0025% by weight of mycrobutanil, with the remainder being water.

[0050] Comparative Example 8 is an aqueous pesticide composition containing 0.01% by weight of dinotefuran and 0.01% by weight of penthiopyrad, with the remainder being water.

[0051] Examples 1 and Comparative Examples 1-8 were each placed in spray containers.

[0052] (Test to confirm the effects on honeybees (direct spray)) Location: Indoor testing room Temperature: 25℃, Humidity: Unclear Test insect: European honeybee Test materials: Example 1, Comparative Examples 1-4 The test method for confirming the effects on honeybees (direct spray) was as follows: First, 10 test insects were placed in a glass ring with a diameter of 80 mm, and the glass ring was then covered with a wire mesh. The test agent was sprayed twice into the glass ring from a distance of 20 cm from the wire mesh. The number of dead test insects was counted 6 hours after spraying and 24 hours after spraying, and the mortality rate of the test insects was calculated based on the following formula (1). The test group that was not sprayed with the test agent was designated as the untreated group. The test was repeated three times, and the average value was used as the test result.

[0053] Mortality rate (%) = (Number of fatalities (fish) / 10 (fish)) × 100 (1)

[0054] [Table 1]

[0055] As shown in Table 1, in Example 1, no bee mortality was observed even 24 hours after spraying. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1 to 4, the mortality rate was 30% or more 6 hours after spraying, and 100% 24 hours after spraying.

[0056] Furthermore, Figure 2 shows photographs taken 15 minutes after spraying honeybees with Example 1, Comparative Example 7, and Comparative Example 8 using the method described above. Note that, in this case, the glass ring was covered with filter paper on one side and a nylon mesh net on the other side, rather than with wire mesh. No honeybee deaths were observed in Example 1, but all honeybees died in Comparative Examples 7 and 8.

[0057] (Test to confirm the effect on honeybees (residue-based)) Location: Indoor testing room Temperature: 25℃, Humidity: Unclear Test insect: European honeybee Test materials: Example 1, Comparative Examples 1-4 The test method for confirming the effect on honeybees (residue) was as follows: First, the test agent was evenly sprayed onto a 100 mm diameter filter paper so that the entire filter paper was wet with the test agent. Ten test insects were placed on the filter paper to come into contact with the test agent, and then the container was covered with a plastic cup. To prevent the test insects from suffocating inside the plastic cup, numerous air holes of about 1 mm in diameter were made in the lid of the plastic cup. The number of lethal insects was counted 6 hours and 24 hours after the test insects were placed on the filter paper, and the mortality rate was calculated based on the above formula (1). The test group in which the test agent was not sprayed was designated as the untreated group. The test was repeated three times, and the average value was used as the test result.

[0058] [Table 2]

[0059] As shown in Table 2, in Example 1, no bee mortality was observed even 24 hours after the test insects were placed on the filter paper. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1 to 4, the mortality rate was 40% or more 6 hours after the test insects were placed on the filter paper, and the mortality rate after 24 hours was 100% or close to 100%.

[0060] (Insecticide sustained test 1) Location: Indoor testing room Temperature: 25℃, Humidity: 23% Test insect: Spodoptera litura Test materials: Example 1, Comparative Examples 1-4 The method for the insecticidal sustained-effect test 1 was as follows: First, the test agent was sprayed onto the pansy so that it was completely wet (approximately 6-7 sprays from the spray container). Then, after 6 weeks, one pansy leaf was cut off, and water-moistened filter paper was placed in a plastic cup, with two test insects and one pansy leaf placed inside, and the lid was closed. Numerous air holes of about 1 mm in diameter were made in the plastic cup to prevent the test insects from suffocating. After 24 hours, the degree of damage to the pansy leaf was evaluated. After 48 hours, the number of lethal test insects was counted.

[0061] [Table 3]

[0062] As shown in Table 3, in Example 1, the mortality rate of the beet armyworm was 100%, and the pansy leaves were hardly eaten. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1-4, the mortality rate of the beet armyworm was 0%, and the pansy leaves were either completely eaten or partially eaten.

[0063] (Insecticide sustained test 2) Location: Greenhouse Temperature: 24-27°C, Humidity: As it is Test insect: Peach aphid Test materials: Example 1, Comparative Examples 1-4 The test method for the insecticidal sustained-effect test 2 was as follows: First, the test agent was sprayed onto the pansies so that they were completely wet (approximately 6 to 7 sprays from the spray container). Then, the number of test insects that settled on the pansies was counted over time, and the corrected density index was calculated based on the following formula (2).

[0064] Corrected density index = (Number of insects in the treated area after X days / Density of the treated area before spraying) × (Number of insects in the untreated area before spraying / Number of insects in the untreated area after X days) × 100 ...(2)

[0065] [Table 4]

[0066] As shown in Table 4, in Example 1, the corrected density index was 0 after 14 and 21 days, and after 35 days it was 1 or less. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 2 to 4, the corrected density index after 35 days was 20 or more, and in Comparative Example 1, the corrected density index after 35 days was 6 or more. (Insecticide sustained testing 3) Location: Greenhouse Temperature: 28-29℃, Humidity: Unclear Test insect: Cotton aphid Test materials: Example 1, Comparative Example 5 The test method for the insecticidal sustained-effect test 3 was as follows: First, the test agent was sprayed onto watermelons. The number of test insects that had settled on the watermelons was counted 3 and 7 days after spraying.

[0067] [Table 5]

[0068] As shown in Table 5, in Example 1, there were 97 insects 7 days after spraying, compared to 1757 insects in Comparative Example 5. Furthermore, in Example 1, the number of established insects was lower 7 days after spraying compared to 3 days after spraying, whereas in Comparative Example 5, the opposite was true: the number of established insects was higher 7 days after spraying compared to 3 days after spraying. (Insecticide sustained test 4) Location: Greenhouse Temperature: 20-27℃, Humidity: As it is Test insects: Three species of thrips were found in the greenhouse (Philips japonica, Thrips citrus, and Thrips occidentalis).

[0069] Test materials: Example 1, Comparative Example 3 The test method for the insecticidal sustained-effect test 4 was as follows: First, the test agent was sprayed onto the roses. Three days after spraying, the number of test insects that had settled on the roses was counted, and the corrected density index was calculated based on formula (2) above.

[0070] [Table 6]

[0071] As shown in Table 6, in Example 1, the corrected density index was low at 29.1, while in Comparative Example 3, the corrected density index was high at 46.8. (Insecticide sustained test 5) Location: Greenhouse Temperature: 12-20℃, Humidity: As it is Test insect: Cotton aphid Test materials: Example 1, Comparative Example 6 The method for the insecticidal sustained-effect test 5 was as follows: First, the test agent was sprayed onto chrysanthemums, and the number of test insects that settled on the chrysanthemums was counted 3, 7, and 14 days after spraying.

[0072] [Table 7]

[0073] As shown in Table 7, in Example 1, the number of colonized insects was low, with 4 insects 7 days after spraying and 2 insects 14 days after spraying. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 6, there were 940 insects 7 days after spraying and 1228 insects 14 days after spraying.

[0074] Furthermore, the effects described above are observed when the flubendiamide concentration is in the range of 0.003% by weight or more and 0.05% by weight or less. Also, the effects described above are observed when the flonicamide concentration is in the range of 0.0025% by weight or more and 0.02% by weight or less. Furthermore, the effects described above are observed when the pyraziflumid concentration is in the range of 0.0001% by weight or more and 0.05% by weight or less.

[0075] The embodiments described above are merely illustrative in all respects and should not be interpreted restrictively. Furthermore, any modifications or changes that fall within the equivalent scope of the claims are all within the scope of the present invention. [Industrial applicability]

[0076] As described above, the pesticide compositions and pesticide spray products relating to this disclosure can be used, for example, in home gardening. [Explanation of Symbols]

[0077] 1. Pesticide spray products 10 spray bottles 11 bottles 12 Triggers 13 nozzles

Claims

1. A pesticide composition containing flubendiamide, flonicamide, pyraziflumid, and one or more auxiliary components, and water, The concentration of flubendiamide is 0.003% by weight or more and 0.05% by weight or less. The concentration of flonicamide is 0.0025% by weight or more and 0.02% by weight or less. The pesticide composition is characterized in that the concentration of pyraziflumid is 0.0001% by weight or more and 0.05% by weight or less.

2. In the pesticide composition according to claim 1, A pesticide composition comprising the flubendiamide, pyraziflumid, flonicamide, the surfactant as an auxiliary component, and water.

3. In the pesticide composition according to claim 1, A pesticide composition further containing vitalizing ingredients.

4. A pesticide spray product in which the pesticide composition described in claim 1 is filled into a spray container.

Images