Economical manufacturing methods for lightweight components

Abstract

To provide a method for economic production of light structural components with high flexibility in the geometry attainable.SOLUTION: The present invention provides a magnesium-containing alloy of a specific composition, and a material comprising the magnesium-containing alloy.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] This invention relates to an economical method for manufacturing light metal substrate components. Because this method can produce lightweight components with high mechanical properties even at high temperatures, it is particularly suitable for manufacturing structural components. These components can also be manufactured with high environmental resistance and flame resistance. Furthermore, intermetallic compounds may also be suitable in certain embodiments of this invention. [Overview of the project]

[0002] Material properties are undoubtedly one of the main limitations on engineering advancements. Often, materials with high mechanical resistance, along with other properties, are preferred. In the case of metals, their alloys, and metal matrix composites, advancements in manufacturing methods are mostly achieved by improving the understanding of the effects of alloying. Microstructures can also be achieved through thermomechanical treatment, and have recently been further improved by advancements in manufacturing processes. In moving structural components, it is often desirable to be as lightweight as possible. Often, the properties required for a particular application are somewhat contradictory; that is, both properties are required at a high level, but an increase in one leads to a decrease in the other. In such cases, finding a suitable compromise is crucial. One well-known example of this is the conflict between properties more or less related to mechanical resistance (wear resistance, penetration resistance, etc.) and toughness-related properties (fracture toughness, elongation, elasticity, etc.). A better compromise between these properties can be achieved, in particular, through the strategies described above. When it comes to the ductility and damage resistance of metals or other properties related to metal substrates, it is desirable to combine lightweight construction, optimization of the structural design of components, and material engineering in material design. Many designs that are feasible or economically viable are limited by the flexibility of available manufacturing methods. When a light metal substrate is desired, titanium, aluminum, magnesium, lithium, and even alloys of very high-strength steel are often used. In some applications, it is recommended to optimize the ratio of a dominant mechanical property to density, but only if it is balanced with other mechanical properties. Examples of structural components include yield strength / density, modulus / density, modulus / density squared, and fatigue strength / density. Surprisingly, very high-density materials can sometimes achieve the optimal ratio, and weight savings through thinning of components are not uncommon. In some applications, particularly when the flexibility of molding techniques such as additive manufacturing (AM) and metal-in-metal manufacturing (MIM) can be utilized, excessive thinning is of little use. In such cases, and when lightweight structures are required, the density of the material used becomes even more important. In fact, AM technology encompasses a wide variety of techniques, including i) binder injection, ii) directed energy application, iii) material extrusion, iv) material injection, v) powder bed fusion, vi) sheet lamination, and vii) vat photopolymerization. This classification summarizes a wide range of technologies, including but not limited to 3D printing, inkjet, S-print, M-print technology, techniques where concentrated energy generates a molten pool for depositing raw materials (powder or wire materials) using lasers (laser deposition and laser solidification), arc or electron beam heat sources (direct metal deposition and electron beam direct melting), fused deposition modeling (FDM), material injection, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), selective laser melting (SLM), electron beam melting (EBM), selective laser sintering (SLS), stereolithography, and digital photoprocessing (DLP). To construct extremely lightweight structures, such as microlattice materials, it is sometimes necessary to construct extremely thin walls in increments of tens of nanometers. Currently, this is limited to a limited number of electrodepositable metallic materials. Lightweight structures are often more expensive, which can be an obstacle to wider implementation. Conversely, cost is often a strong driving force for the implementation of certain technologies. For some lightweight components, not only mechanical properties but also environmental resistance must be considered. Most light alloys are highly reactive to oxygen (often even more so at high temperatures) and many other chemicals. This is often a significant drawback in the applications of those light alloys. Furthermore, the flammability of light metal alloys when exposed to flames can be a major obstacle to their applications. Lithium, magnesium, and their alloys are among the lightest metal alloys with highly useful mechanical properties, but unfortunately, their strong reactions with oxygen and nitrogen at very low temperatures make their applications difficult. For structural components or other types of components that require good creep resistance, high modulus of elasticity even at high temperatures, and environmental resistance, certain intermetallic compounds (such as gTiAl) can be very suitable candidates. However, they also exhibit low-temperature brittleness, making them very difficult to mold into complex shapes. Furthermore, some intermetallic compounds exhibit particularly slow impurity diffusion rates, and therefore, diffusion related to component joining is also somewhat difficult for some intermetallic components. In applications requiring high rigidity, mechanical strength, and energy absorption during impacts, reinforced polymers often offer an excellent technical solution. Some of the obstacles relate to cost, anisotropy, reliability (e.g., degradation of properties due to long-term environmental conditions), electrical and thermal conductivity, and sometimes compression and fatigue performance (depending on the load mode). As described, there are different load scenarios for the main loads on structural components. Many components benefit from high performance and weight reduction, and these can benefit from the applications of the present invention. The following are just a few examples, but properties that can be relevant to different applications include mechanical strength, modulus of elasticity, yield strength, environmental resistance, oxidation resistance at high temperatures, creep resistance, compressive resistance, yield under compression, fatigue strength, energy absorption capacity during impact, electrical conductivity, dielectric properties, and thermal conductivity. It is rarely possible to maximize all of these at once, and therefore an optimal compromise is recommended. In application design, this invention may contribute to improving the weight-to-performance ratio. Furthermore, combining substrates with different properties can be beneficial. This invention enables the inexpensive manufacture of components with an excellent weight-to-performance ratio. Furthermore, it allows for more effective utilization of the properties of different materials, particularly when at least one metal or intermetallic compound is included. Current Technical Status The manufacture of metal components has always been a challenge for additive manufacturing technologies, with a lack of mechanical properties and high costs consistently cited as the main obstacles to their development. Bampton et al. published an invention (US5745834) relating to the free-form manufacturing of metal components using selective laser bonding by transient liquid sintering of mixed powders. The mixed powders used in this invention consist of a base metal or base metal alloy (75-85%), a low-melting-point metal alloy (5-15%), and a polymer binder (5-15%). Base metals considered include metallic elements such as nickel, iron, cobalt, copper, tungsten, molybdenum, rhenium, titanium, and aluminum. As for the low-melting-point metal alloys, this can be selected from base metals containing a melting point depressant (boron, silicon, carbon, or phosphorus) to lower the melting point of the base alloy by about 300-400°C. The SLS method and other powder-based AM techniques considered in this invention are highly dependent on the powder properties. Similar to the invention reported by Pfeifer & Shen in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006 / 0251535 A1, plastic, metal, or ceramic particles can be coated with a particulate material that is adhesive and sinterable, or forms glass. In that patent application, the particulate material (submicrometer or nanoparticles of plastic, metal, or ceramic) is coated with an organic or organometallic polymer compound that has low hydrophilicity and takes into account the temperature difference when the powder material is 100°C. In the case of metal powder material, the particulate material is preferably formed from a metal or alloy consisting of the elements Cu, Sn, Zn, Al, Bi, Fe, or Pb. Activation of the adhesive can occur by laser irradiation designed to cause sintering, or at least sintering or partial melting by sintering or the formation of glass bridges between adjacent powder particles. If the heat treatment is performed below the glass formation temperature or sintering temperature of the powder material, substantially no sintering shrinkage of the whole or compacted material occurs. As seen in Walter Lengauer's study DE102013004182 on print coatings for direct FDM printing, the green component can also be obtained by other 3D printing techniques.Print coatings are composed of one or more polymer organic binder components and inorganic powder components consisting of metal, a hard material containing a binder metal, or a ceramic material. The formed compacts can then be subjected to a sintering process for manufacturing the final parts. Other 3D printing variations, such as FDM processes and direct metal fabrication, are limited in the resolution and size of the components. In this embodiment, Canzona et al. presented a direct metal fabrication method (US2005 / 0191200 A) for forming metal parts with a relative density of at least 96%. The powder mixture presented in that study consists of a base alloy, a powdered low-melting-point alloy, and two organic polymer binders (thermoplastic and thermosetting organic polymers). This powder blend can be used in other powder layer-related methods, such as selective laser sintering where ultrasolidus-liquid-phase sintering is performed. As in the study published by Bampton, low-melting-point alloys are produced by introducing small amounts of boron into the alloy as a eutectic-forming element. Scandium is also considered as a eutectic-forming element. In additive manufacturing of ceramic parts by polymerization of ceramic particle-filled resin using laser photopolymerization, large parts are particularly prone to cracking, making it only possible to manufacture small parts. Thermosetting polymer binders harden before thermoplastic binders remelt. This provides crucial support for the compact's shape while heating it to a temperature that increases the compact's strength by initiating metal-to-metal powder sintering (neck formation at powder contact points). Details of the invention Combining the properties of different materials is often very interesting in order to achieve the extremely lightweight structures desired for many applications at an economical price, and combinations involving metals are very often optimal. In some applications, single-metal structures may also be worth considering if the alloying system is appropriate. Furthermore, greater design freedom increases the potential for weight optimization. However, conventionally, design freedom often comes at the expense of cost. Additive manufacturing (AM) has evolved dramatically in recent years and become relatively inexpensive over the decades. However, the most advanced and cost-effective AM molding techniques enable the use of polymers. Materials that combine the properties of both metals and polymers, such as reinforced polymer composites, are also worth considering. Manufacturing methods for metal alloys, which offer high design flexibility, are generally incompatible with the low decomposition temperatures of polymers. For this reason, the development of manufacturing methods for complex shapes using metal alloys is considered important in some areas, but even then, the temperatures are much lower than their melting points. Among all light metal alloys relevant to engineering or potential applications, the inventors discovered that a very interesting combination of properties can be achieved with magnesium alloys. At first glance, this seems impossible due to its extremely high melting point compared to the decomposition temperatures of most polymers. Magnesium and most of its known alloys react very violently with oxygen and also react with numerous working agents. This corrosion tendency is a hindrance in various applications. Furthermore, they tend to burn with fairly high heat, which is also a very detrimental property in many applications. In addition, many magnesium alloys are extremely difficult to weld, which is a hindrance in many structural applications compared to others. Therefore, despite their low density and relatively high abundance, the applications in which magnesium alloys are used are quite limited. Lithium is much lighter than magnesium, but its significantly lower coefficient of reactivity is a major obstacle to its use as a structural component. Furthermore, it is more reactive with oxygen than magnesium. Magnesium-lithium alloys are lighter than magnesium alloys. Surprisingly, when the alloying is properly selected, it is possible to achieve appropriate modulus values ​​in the order of structural magnesium and aluminum alloys. Unfortunately, lithium further exacerbates some of the significant drawbacks of magnesium alloys, particularly in terms of corrosion, oxidation, flammability, and weldability. Magnesium alloys containing large amounts of lithium may have lower melting points, but their modulus, mechanical strength, and especially creep resistance values ​​are clearly too low for structural applications, or almost all types of applications. In particular, when normalized values ​​(values ​​of properties divided by the alloy density) are considered, it was found that magnesium alloys can be processed at sufficiently low temperatures even when the balance of mechanical properties such as high modulus of elasticity, mechanical strength, and creep resistance is well-maintained, thereby enabling shape retention by polymers. Even more surprisingly, this alloy exhibits good environmental resistance and resistance to combustion. When alloys with a considerably high magnesium content are properly alloyed and processed with lithium, it is also possible to achieve such remarkable behavior while exhibiting very low densities. This system makes it possible to solidify fine particles at a temperature much lower than the melting point of magnesium. In certain embodiments, it has been found that it is worth considering the presence of at least two types of particulate magnesium alloys. In certain embodiments, it is worth considering the presence of at least one lithium-containing particulate magnesium alloy. In other embodiments, it is recommended that at least one lithium-containing particulate magnesium alloy contains more than 36% by weight, or more than 42% by weight, more than 52% by weight, more than 62% by weight, more than 72% by weight, or more than 81% by weight of lithium. Furthermore, in certain embodiments, it has been found that it is worth considering the presence of at least one particulate magnesium alloy having a sufficiently low melting point (in this specification, the melting point is defined as the temperature at which liquefaction begins, unless otherwise specified). In different embodiments, at least one of the particulate magnesium alloys has a melting point of less than 390°C, less than 340°C, 290°C, less than 240°C, and even less than 190°C. The test conditions are shown at the end of this specification. The melting point was measured according to ASTM E794-06 (2012). Alternatively, a technical expert reproducing this disclosure may, at their discretion, obtain the melting point using thermogravimetric methods or any other characterization technique. Since the typical deviation in determining this temperature is not significant, the temperature determined by the solidus line of the corresponding phase diagram is a sufficiently good approximation, as is the temperature determined by CALPHAD-type software, which incorporates Thermo-Calc (Thermo-Calc 2016b, released in November 2016), the latest version of the software available as of January 27, 2017. Alternatively, a technical expert reproducing this invention may, at their discretion, obtain the melting point using thermogravimetric methods or other characterization techniques, or experimentally determine this temperature by a very simple method using DSC, DTA, or DTA with STA. One embodiment refers to the following magnesium alloy compositions, expressed as weight percentages. %Si:0‐15; %Cu:0‐30; %Mn:0‐15; %Be:0‐15; %Zn:0‐15; %Li:0.6‐70; %Sc:0‐20; %Fe<30; %Pb:0‐10; %Zr:0‐10; %Cr:0‐15; %V:0‐10; %Ti:0‐20; %Bi:0‐20; %Ga:0‐20; %N:0‐2; %B:0‐5; %Al:0‐60; %Ni:0‐40; %Mo:0‐15; %W:0‐30; %Ta:0‐5; %Hf:0‐5; %Nb:0‐10; %Co:0‐30; %Ce:0‐15; %Ge:0‐20; %Ca:0‐15; %In:0‐20; %Cd:0‐20; %Sn:0‐40; %Cs:0‐20; %Se:0‐10; %Te:0‐10; %As:0‐10; %Sb:0‐20; %Rb:0‐20; %La:0‐15; %C:0‐5; %O:0‐15; %Y:0‐30; %Nd:0‐30; %Tm:0‐15; %Tb:0‐15; Gd: 0-20; Dy: 0-15; Yb: 0-15; Er: 0-15; Sm: 0-15; Pr: 0-15; Ho: 0-25; Lu: 0-15; Th: 0-15; In the above formula, %Gd + %Nd + %Sm + %Y + %Pr + %Sc + %Pm + %Eu + %Tb + %Dy + %Ho + %Er + %Tm + %Yb + %Lu + %Th = 0.002-34, and %Zr + %Zn + %Mn + %Y + %Ce + %La + %Ca + %Sc = 0.002-34 The remainder is composed of magnesium and trace elements, with %Mg > 12%. Needless to say, the composition can only add up to 100%, which is an obvious condition and therefore not included as a condition. Accordingly, compositions whose total exceeds 100% are automatically excluded (in one embodiment, the condition is, for example, as follows. For applications where elements with atomic number exceeding 103 have little significance in the disclosed alloy, in the above formula, %H + %He + %Li + "...." + %Md + %No + %Lr ≤ 100%, where "...." represents the sum of elements in the periodic table with atomic numbers from 4 to 100) (in one embodiment, the above condition can also be stated as follows: it is characterized in that the sum of all elements with atomic number no more than 118 is equal to 100%). Needless to say, an element whose range starts with 0, or an element whose composition range is expressed as less than (%Element < XX.X) is optional, which means that such element is not included under general circumstances. For example, when the composition range is %Cu = 0-30% and Fe by weight < 30 wt%, there are many embodiments where neither %Fe nor %Cu is present, and many embodiments where neither is intentionally added (therefore, this reference composition indicates 0% or the absence of the element. However, they can be present as trace elements depending on the purity of scrap, alloying elements, contamination of the dissolved recipient, and other possible sources of contamination during alloy manufacturing). There will also be many embodiments where only one is absent or undesirable, while the other is not. The example illustrated with %Fe and %Cu is applicable to any other element. The standard compositions as expressed herein may refer to the general final composition of particles or alloys having higher volume fractions. In the presence of immiscible particles such as ceramic reinforcements (especially particles, fibers, whiskers, etc.), graphene, nanotubes (often carbon nanotubes), and fibers (SiC, SiN, carbon, aramid, basalt, glass, etc.), these are not included in the standard compositions. In embodiments and models where high diffusivity or low melting point particles are used, selection within this compositional range may be possible for some embodiments worth considering, although this is often not the case, as will be discussed later in this specification. As will be discussed later in this specification, some components are manufactured using materials that include molded organic and inorganic parts. In some embodiments, the above compositions, with potential limitations described in the following paragraph, refer to the overall general composition of the metallic phases contained in the inorganic part of the material. The above compositions, with potential limitations described in the following paragraph, refer to the overall general composition of all metallic phases contained in the inorganic part of the material. There may also be embodiments where the weight ratios are %Mg > 12%, %Mg > 22%, and %Mg > 62%. In another embodiment, the above composition, subject to the potential limitations described in the following paragraph, refers to metal phase particles that have the highest volume fraction at the moment the polymer (the organic portion of the material containing the polymer) is filled with the metal phase. In one embodiment, the above composition, subject to the potential limitations described in the following paragraph, refers primarily to metal particles that have the highest volume fraction at the moment the organic portion of the material is filled with different particles and reinforcing materials. Unless otherwise specified, trace elements refer to several elements. However, unless the context is particularly clear, include, but are not limited to, H, He, Xe, F, Ne, Na, P, S, Cl, Ar, K, Br, Kr, Sr, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, I, Ba, Pm, Eu, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Po, At, Rn, Fr, Ra, Ac, Pa, U, Np, Pu, Am, Cm, Bk, Cf, Es, Fm, Md, No, Lr, Rf, Db, Sg, Bh, Hs, and Mt. In some applications, it has been found important to limit the content of trace elements individually or in composition to less than 1.8%, less than 0.8%, less than 0.1%, and even less than 0.03% by weight. In some embodiments, elements present as undesirable impurities are trace elements. Trace elements may be intentionally added to alloys to achieve specific functions, such as reducing the production cost of the alloy. Alternatively, their presence may be unintentional and primarily related to the presence of alloying elements used in the alloy's manufacture and impurities in the scrap. In some applications, the presence of trace elements is detrimental to the overall properties of magnesium-based alloys. In other embodiments, the total content of all trace elements is preferably less than 2.0%, 1.4%, 0.8%, 0.2%, 0.1%, and even less than 0.06% by weight. There are also embodiments for certain applications where the absence of trace elements in the magnesium alloy is desirable (in this specification, even if magnesium is not the primary alloying element, it is generally referred to as a magnesium alloy). Depending on the application, the presence of alkali or halogen elements may adversely affect the mechanical properties. In another embodiment, the content of %F, %Cl, %Br, or %At, individually or in total, is preferably less than 210 ppm by weight, less than 140 ppm by weight, less than 110 ppm by weight, less than 90 ppm by weight, less than 40 ppm by weight, or absent. In another embodiment, the content of %Na, %K, %Rb, or %Cs, individually or in total, is preferably less than 180 ppm by weight, less than 74 ppm by weight, less than 36 ppm by weight, less than 12 ppm by weight, less than 8 ppm by weight, less than 2.8 ppm by weight, less than 0.7 ppm by weight, less than 0.4 ppm by weight, less than 0.009 ppm by weight, less than 0.001 ppm by weight, or absent. While magnesium alloys benefit from a high magnesium (%Mg) content, magnesium is not necessarily the primary component of the alloy to balance the mechanical properties. In other embodiments, it is recommended that the %Mg content be greater than 12 wt%, 21 wt%, 33 wt%, 42 wt%, 52 wt%, 69 wt%, 78 wt%, and even greater than 87 wt%. In some embodiments, it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Mg is not excessive. It has been found that if the total amount of %Mg is excessive, undesirable compromises between corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur. In other embodiments, it is recommended that the %Mg content be less than 94 wt%, 88 wt%, 79 wt%, 68 wt%, 48 wt%, 41 wt%, 38 wt%, 24 wt%, and even less than 18 wt%. Magnesium alloys can benefit from their high lithium (%Li) content in some applications. In some embodiments, %Li helps improve certain mechanical properties of the alloy. In particular, when properly combined with other alloying elements, surprisingly, %Li contributes to an increase in the ratio of (modulus of elasticity * elongation at fracture / density). Even more surprisingly, this is a simultaneous increase in both modulus of elasticity and elongation at fracture. As will be discussed later, this ultimately determines whether the embodiment is properly implemented. In some embodiments, %Li can be the dominant element of the alloy. Therefore, it may be argued that such an alloy should ultimately be strictly considered a lithium alloy, rather than a magnesium alloy or magnesium-lithium alloy. As will be discussed later, typically, %Li content exceeding 10 wt% is used only to improve formability, at least partially cubicizing the alloy. Therefore, as the powder metallurgy process is near net-shape, it is generally not worthwhile to produce powders with such high %Li content. However, as will be discussed later, surprisingly, there are embodiments where producing particulate magnesium alloys with high %Li content makes perfect sense. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Li be greater than 0.6 wt%, 1.2 wt%, 2.3 wt%, 4.2 wt%, 5.2 wt%, 6.9 wt%, 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 8.7 wt%. Higher %Li content is recommended in some embodiments to further emphasize the aforementioned properties and in some applications where special attention is paid to further minimizing corrosion. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Li be greater than 9.6 wt%, 10.2 wt%, 11.2 wt%, 12.2 wt%, 14.2 wt%, 16 wt%, 18 wt%, and even greater than 26 wt%. As already mentioned, there are embodiments in which %Li can be the majority element of the alloy. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Li be greater than 36 wt%, 42 wt%, 52 wt%, and even greater than 62 wt%. There are also embodiments in which it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Li is not excessive. We discovered that an excessive total amount of %Li can lead to an undesirable compromise between corrosion resistance and mechanical properties.In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Li be less than 44 wt%, less than 18 wt%, less than 14.8 wt%, less than 11.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 4.1 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.8 wt%, and even less than 0.9 wt%. In one embodiment, when optimizing the properties of the alloy when %Li is between 6.9 wt% and 25.1 wt%, it was found that it is recommended that at least one of %Ca, %Zr, %Al, or %Zn be present in the alloy. In another embodiment, when optimizing the mechanical properties of the alloy when %Li is between 4.9 wt% and 16.1 wt%, it was found that it is recommended that at least one of %Al, %Zr, %Zn, or %Ca be present in the alloy. In some embodiments, when %Li is less than 5.1 wt%, it is recommended that at least one of %Ca or %Zr be present in the alloy when optimizing the mechanical properties of the alloy. In embodiments for optimizing the mechanical properties of an alloy when %Li is between 10.4 wt% and 16.1 wt%, it has been found that the presence of at least one of %Zr, %Zn, or %Ca in the alloy is recommended. In some embodiments for optimizing the mechanical properties of an alloy when %Li is between 1.9 wt% and 20.1 wt%, it is recommended that at least one of %Al or %Zr be present in the alloy, or that the %REE be greater than 600 wtppm. In some embodiments for optimizing the mechanical properties of an alloy when %Li is less than 12.1 wt%, it is recommended that at least one of %Al, %Zr, or %Ca be present in the composition. In some embodiments for optimizing the mechanical properties of an alloy when %Li is less than 7.1 wt%, it is recommended that at least one of %Ca or %Zr be present in the composition. In embodiments where an optimal compromise in the mechanical properties of an alloy is sought when %Li is less than 10.1% by weight, it is recommended that at least one of %Ca, %Zr, %Al, %Zn, or %REE be present in the alloy.Furthermore, in other applications, it has been found that when %Li is less than 55.6 wt%, it is recommended that at least one of %Y or %Sc be included as a compositional element of the alloy in separate embodiments, individually or in total, exceeding 0.006 wt%, 0.01 wt%, 0.3 wt%, and even 1.1 wt%. In embodiments relating to mechanical properties when %Li is less than 30.6 wt%, it is recommended that at least one of %Y, %Sc, or %Zr be present in the alloy. In another embodiment, it is recommended that they individually or in total exceed 0.08 wt%, 0.6 wt%, and even 1.1 wt%. In yet another embodiment, when %Li is less than 26.6 wt%, the above values ​​of %Y, %Sc, or %Zr are preferred. In embodiments relating to mechanical properties when %Li is less than 26.6 wt%, it is recommended that at least one of %Ca, %Y, or %Sc be present in the alloy. In another embodiment, it is recommended that they be greater than 0.01% by weight, 0.1% by weight, 0.6% by weight, or even 1.2% by weight individually or in total. Rare earth elements (%REE) refer to the 17 chemical elements, 15 lanthanides, and the set of scandium and yttrium from the periodic table. In one embodiment, it has been found that the presence of %REE in the alloy is desirable. In another embodiment, it is desirable to have more than 600 ppm by weight, more than 0.01% by weight, and even more than 0.1% by weight. In yet another embodiment, it is desirable to have %REE in the alloy when %Li is less than 5.1% by weight. It is also desirable to have %REE in the alloy when %Li is less than 30.6% by weight, or less than 26.6% by weight. In yet another embodiment, it is desirable to have at least 10 ppm by weight, at least 100 ppm by weight, at least 0.01% by weight, at least 0.16% by weight, and even more than 0.6% by weight. In some embodiments, it has been found that the presence of at least one of %Ce, %La, and %Y in the %REE is desirable to improve the mechanical properties. We have found that in some embodiments, it is desirable to have at least one of %Nd or %Gd in %REE to improve the mechanical properties. In embodiments where %Li is between 6.9% and 25.1%, it is recommended that at least one of %REE be present in the alloy to improve the mechanical properties. In some embodiments, at least one of %Gd, %Nd, or %Y is included in %REE. In other embodiments, at least %Gd, or at least %Y, or at least %Nd is included in %REE. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high aluminum (%Al) content. In some embodiments, %Al helps to improve the cost-effectiveness of the alloy. Also in some embodiments, %Al helps to improve the mechanical properties of the alloy. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately composed with elements present in other alloys, %Al contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately composed with elements present in other alloys, %Al contributes to improved corrosion resistance. %Al can contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Al becomes the dominant element of the alloy. This may lead to the alloy ultimately being considered strictly an aluminum alloy or an aluminum-lithium alloy. In other embodiments, it is recommended that the %Al content be greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.6 wt%, greater than 1.2 wt%, greater than 2.2 wt%, greater than 3.2 wt%, greater than 5.3 wt%, greater than 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 10.1 wt%. In some embodiments to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, higher %Al content is recommended. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Al be greater than 11.2 wt%, 12.2 wt%, 14.2 wt%, 15.2 wt%, 16 wt%, 18 wt%, and even greater than 26 wt%. As mentioned above, in some embodiments, %Al can be the main element of the alloy. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Al be greater than 36 wt%, 42 wt%, and even greater than 52 wt%. In some embodiments, it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Al is not excessive. We have found that if the total amount of %Al is excessive, undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Al be less than 44 wt%, less than 18 wt%, less than 14.8 wt%, less than 11.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 4.1 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.2 wt%, and even less than 0.8 wt%. In some embodiments, %Al is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high lanthanum (%La) content. %La helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. For this reason, alloys containing %La in particulate form, which generally do not make much sense, make sense in certain embodiments. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %La, they can be found in solid solutions more readily than in bulk alloys of the same composition. This is a major obstacle for many applications, but it is very beneficial for some applications of magnesium alloys. Magnesium-based alloys containing %La are manufactured in particulate form. In another embodiment, the solid solution contains 5 wt% more %La than the equilibrium solid solubility of %La in the alloy at room temperature (23°C and 1 atm) (for example, if the maximum equilibrium solid solubility of %La in a magnesium alloy at room temperature, 23°C, and 1 atm is 0.01 wt%, then the particulate alloy will have at least 0.0105 wt% %La in the solid solution). Alternatively, it may contain 12% or more by weight, 26% or more by weight, 36% or more by weight, 56% or more by weight, 116% or more by weight, or 216% or more by weight (a suitable method for producing granular alloys to achieve higher values ​​of alloying elements in the solid solution is described in this specification). In some alloys, it is more appropriate to control the %La of the solid solution with a constant term in some applications. In other embodiments, the %La content in the solid solution of alloys produced in granular form is 0.001% or more by weight, 0.006% or more by weight, 0.015% or more by weight, and even 0.03% or more by weight. In some embodiments, %La contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %La contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %La contributes to improved corrosion resistance in some applications. %La may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %La has a beneficial effect on %Li.In another embodiment, %La includes amounts greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.6 wt%, greater than 1.2 wt%, greater than 2.2 wt%, greater than 3.2 wt%, greater than 5.3 wt%, greater than 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 10.1 wt%. In a different embodiment to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %La content is recommended. In another embodiment, %La includes amounts greater than 11.2 wt%, greater than 12.2 wt%, and even greater than 13.2 wt%. There are also embodiments where it is necessary to control that the total amount of %La is not excessive. It has been found that if the total amount of %La is excessive, undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %La be less than 11.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 8.8 wt%, less than 6.9 wt%, less than 5.8 wt%, less than 4.1 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.2 wt%, and even less than 0.8 wt%. There are also embodiments where %La is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high scandium (%Sc) content. %Sc helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since this is also true for some alloys containing %Y. Therefore, alloys containing %Sc in particulate form, which generally don't make much sense, do make sense in certain embodiments. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Sc, it is possible to find it in solid solutions more often than in bulk alloys of the same composition. While this is a major obstacle for many applications, it is very beneficial for some applications of magnesium alloys. Magnesium-based alloys containing %Sc are manufactured in particulate form. In another embodiment, the solid solution contains 5% or more by weight of %Sc than the equilibrium solid solubility of %Sc in the alloy at room temperature, 23°C, and 1 atm, or 12% or more by weight, 26% or more by weight, 56% or more by weight, 116% or more by weight, or 216% or more by weight. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Sc of the solid solution with a constant term. In other embodiments, the %Sc content in solid solutions of alloys manufactured in particulate form is 12.2% by weight or more, 12.6% by weight or more, 14.4% by weight or more, and even 17.5% by weight or more. In some embodiments, %Sc contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Sc contributes to the improvement of mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Sc contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Sc contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Sc may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Sc has a positive effect on %Li. In other embodiments, %Sc includes over 0.06% by weight, over 0.6% by weight, over 1.2% by weight, over 2.2% by weight, over 3.2% by weight, over 5.3% by weight, over 7.8% by weight, and even over 10.1% by weight. In different embodiments to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Sc content is recommended. In another embodiment, %Sc includes more than 11.2% by weight, more than 12.2% by weight, more than 13.2% by weight, more than 15.2% by weight, and more than 17.2% by weight.In some embodiments, it is necessary to control the total amount of %Sc to ensure it is not excessive. We have found that if the total amount of %Sc is excessive, it may result in undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties. The use of %Sc when it may be possible to achieve very desirable mechanical properties is just one example of many other high-cost alloying elements (in some embodiments, this is considered high-cost according to the following examples: >$23 / Kg, >$102 / Kg, >$252 / Kg, >$520 / Kg, and even >$1020 / Kg). However, this cost must be considered from an economic standpoint to use the amount required for the desired application. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Sc be less than 14.8 wt%, less than 11.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 8.8 wt%, less than 6.9 wt%, less than 5.8 wt%, less than 4.1 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.2 wt%, and even less than 0.8 wt%. There are also embodiments in which %Sc is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from high lanthanum and scandium (%La+%Sc) content. %La+%Sc helps facilitate strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. For this reason, alloys containing %La+%Sc in particulate form, which generally does not make much sense, make sense in certain embodiments. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %La+%Sc, they can be found in solid solutions more readily than in bulk alloys of the same composition. %La+%Sc contributes to improvements in several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %La+%Sc contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly composed with elements present in other alloys. In some embodiments, %La+%Sc contributes to improved corrosion resistance, especially when properly composed with elements present in other alloys. %La+%Sc may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %La+%Sc has a positive effect on %Li. In another embodiment, %La+%Sc includes amounts greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.6 wt%, greater than 1.2 wt%, greater than 2.2 wt%, greater than 3.2 wt%, greater than 5.3 wt%, greater than 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 10.1 wt%. In a different embodiment to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %La+%Sc content is recommended. In another embodiment, %La+%Sc includes amounts greater than 11.2 wt%, greater than 16.2 wt%, greater than 21.2 wt%, greater than 25.2 wt%, and even greater than 31.2 wt%. There are also embodiments where it is necessary to control that the total amount of %La+%Sc is not excessive. We have found that if the total amount of %La+%Sc is excessive, it may result in undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %La+%Sc be less than 28.8% by weight, less than 18.9% by weight, less than 9.8% by weight, less than 8.8% by weight, less than 6.9% by weight, less than 5.8% by weight, less than 4.1% by weight, less than 2.8% by weight, less than 1.2% by weight, and even less than 0.8% by weight. There are also embodiments in which %La+%Sc is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high calcium (%Ca) content. In some embodiments, %Ca contributes to improved mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Ca contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when appropriately composed with elements present in other alloys. In some embodiments, %Ca contributes to improved corrosion resistance, especially when appropriately composed with elements present in other alloys. %Ca may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Ca has a positive effect on %Li. In other embodiments, %Ca includes over 0.06 wt%, over 0.1 wt%, over 0.6 wt%, over 1.2 wt%, over 2.2 wt%, over 3.2 wt%, over 5.3 wt%, over 7.8 wt%, and even over 10.1 wt%. In different embodiments to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Ca content is recommended. In other embodiments, %Ca includes over 11.2 wt%, over 12.2 wt%, and even over 13.2 wt%. In some embodiments, it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Ca is not excessive. We have found that if the total amount of %Ca is excessive, undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Ca be less than 11.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 8.8 wt%, less than 6.9 wt%, less than 5.8 wt%, less than 4.1 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.2 wt%, and even less than 0.8 wt%. In some embodiments, we have found that the presence of at least one of %Ca, %Zr, %Al, or %Zn in the alloy is recommended for improved mechanical properties. When %Li is less than 56.6 wt, in another embodiment, it is recommended that the presence of %Ca be greater than 0.01 wt%, greater than 0.2 wt%, and even greater than 0.9 wt%. When %Li is less than 30.6 wt%, it is recommended that the presence of %Ca be greater than 100 wt ppm, greater than 0.16 wt%, and even greater than 0.8 wt%. Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Ca is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high beryllium (%Be) content. %Be helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. Therefore, alloys containing %Be in particulate form, which generally do not make much sense, do make sense in certain embodiments. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Be, they can be found in solid solutions more readily than in bulk alloys of the same composition. This is a major obstacle for many applications, but it is very beneficial for some applications of magnesium alloys. Magnesium-based alloys containing %Be are manufactured in particulate form. In another embodiment, the solid solution contains 5% or more by weight of %Be than the equilibrium solid solubility of %Be in the alloy at room temperature, 23°C, and 1 atm, or 12% or more by weight, 26% or more by weight, 56% or more by weight, 116% or more by weight, or 216% or more by weight. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Be of the solid solution with a constant term. In some embodiments, %Be contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Sc contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Be also contributes to improved corrosion resistance. %Be may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Be has a positive effect on %Li. In other embodiments, %Be includes over 0.06 wt%, over 0.6 wt%, over 1.2 wt%, over 2.2 wt%, over 3.2 wt%, over 5.3 wt%, over 7.8 wt%, and even over 10.1 wt%. In different embodiments to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Be content is recommended. In other embodiments, %Be includes over 11.2 wt%, over 12.2 wt%, and even over 13.2 wt%. In some embodiments, it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Be is not excessive. We have found that when the total amount of %Be is excessive, undesirable compromises between corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur.In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Be be less than 11.9% by weight, less than 9.8% by weight, less than 8.8% by weight, less than 6.9% by weight, less than 5.8% by weight, less than 4.1% by weight, less than 2.8% by weight, less than 1.2% by weight, and even less than 0.8% by weight. There are also embodiments in which %Be is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high yttrium (%Y) content. In some embodiments, %Y contributes to improvements in several mechanical properties. In some applications, %Y contributes to improved corrosion resistance, especially when appropriately combined with other alloying elements. %Y may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Y has a positive effect on %Li. In other embodiments, %Y includes over 0.06 wt%, over 0.6 wt%, over 1.2 wt%, over 2.2 wt%, over 3.2 wt%, over 5.3 wt%, over 7.8 wt%, and even over 10.1 wt%. In different embodiments to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Y content is recommended. In other embodiments, %Y includes over 11.2 wt%, over 16.2 wt%, over 21.2 wt%, and even over 25.2 wt%. In some embodiments, it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Y is not excessive. We found that when the total amount of %Y is excessive, undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties can occur. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Y be less than 28.8 wt%, less than 18.8 wt%, less than 14.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 8.8 wt%, less than 6.9 wt%, less than 5.8 wt%, less than 4.1 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.2 wt%, and even less than 0.8 wt%. When manufacturing particulate magnesium alloys containing %Y, we found that if the particles are metal powder and properly manufactured, it is possible to find a higher percentage of %Y in solid solutions than in bulk alloys of the same composition. This is a major obstacle for many applications, but is very beneficial for some applications of magnesium alloys. Magnesium-based alloys containing %Y are manufactured in particulate form. In another embodiment, the solid solution contains 5% by weight or more of %Y than the equilibrium solid solubility of %Y in the alloy at room temperature, 23°C, and 1 atm, or contains 12% by weight or more, 26% by weight or more, 56% by weight or more, 116% by weight or more, or 216% by weight or more. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Y of the solid solution with a constant term.In another embodiment, the %Y content in the solid solution of the alloy manufactured in particulate form is 1.8% by weight or more, 2.1% by weight or more, 2.6% by weight or more, 3.2% by weight or more, 4.6% by weight or more, 6.1% by weight or more, and even 8.1% by weight or more. There are also embodiments in which %Y is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from high lanthanum, calcium, beryllium, yttrium, and scandium (%Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc) content. %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc helps facilitate strengthening of the alloy. In some embodiments, %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc contributes to improved mechanical properties. In some embodiments, especially when properly composed with elements present in other alloys, %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, especially when properly composed with elements present in other alloys, %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc contributes to improved corrosion resistance. %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, the total amount of %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc has a positive effect on %Li. In another embodiment, %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc includes amounts greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.6 wt%, greater than 1.2 wt%, greater than 2.2 wt%, greater than 3.2 wt%, greater than 5.3 wt%, greater than 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 10.1 wt%. In a different embodiment to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc content is recommended. In another embodiment, %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc includes amounts greater than 11.2 wt%, greater than 16.2 wt%, greater than 21.2 wt%, greater than 25.2 wt%, and even greater than 31.2 wt%. There are also embodiments where it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc is not excessive. We have found that when the total amount of %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc is excessive, undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc be less than 28.8% by weight, less than 18.9% by weight, less than 9.8% by weight, less than 8.8% by weight, less than 6.9% by weight, less than 5.8% by weight, less than 4.1% by weight, less than 2.8% by weight, less than 1.2% by weight, and even less than 0.8% by weight. There are also embodiments in which %Y+%Ca+%Be+%La+%Sc is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high ytterbium (%Yb) content. %Yb helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Yb, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %Sc, which is also applicable in the case of %Yb. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Yb of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Yb content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 0.01% by weight or more, 0.1% by weight or more, 0.4% by weight or more, 1.1% by weight or more, 1.6% by weight or more, 2.1% by weight or more, and even 3.1% by weight or more. There are also embodiments where %Yb contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Yb contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Yb contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Yb contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Yb may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Yb has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %Be disclosed above can also be applied to the %Yb content. Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Yb is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high dysprosium (%Dy) content. %Dy helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Dy, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Dy. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Dy of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Dy content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 5.6% by weight or more, 6.6% by weight or more, 8.6% by weight or more, 12.6% by weight or more, 16% by weight or more, and even 22% by weight or more. In some embodiments, %Dy contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Dy contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Dy contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Dy may also contribute to improved corrosion resistance. %Dy may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Dy has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to the %Dy content. Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Dy is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high thorium (%Th) content. %Th helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Th, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Th. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Th of the solid solution with a constant term. There are also embodiments where %Th contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. There are also embodiments where %Th contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Th contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Th may also contribute to improved corrosion resistance. %Th may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Th has a positive effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to %Th content. There are also embodiments where %Th is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high total content of ytterbium, dysprosium, and thorium (%Yb+%Dy+%Th). %Yb+%Dy+%Th helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. Therefore, alloys containing %Yb+%Dy+%Th in particle form, which generally does not make much sense, make sense in certain embodiments. In some embodiments, %Yb+%Dy+%Th contributes to improved mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Yb+%Dy+%Th contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly composed with elements in other alloys. In some embodiments, %Yb+%Dy+%Th contributes to improved corrosion resistance, especially when properly composed with elements in other alloys. %Yb+%Dy+%Th may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, the total amount of %Yb+%Dy+%Th has a positive effect on %Li. In another embodiment, %Yb+%Dy+%Th includes amounts greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.6 wt%, greater than 1.2 wt%, greater than 2.2 wt%, greater than 3.2 wt%, greater than 5.3 wt%, greater than 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 10.1 wt%. In a different embodiment to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Yb+%Dy+%Th content is recommended. In another embodiment, %Yb+%Dy+%Th includes amounts greater than 11.2 wt%, greater than 16.2 wt%, greater than 21.2 wt%, greater than 25.2 wt%, and even greater than 31.2 wt%. There are also embodiments where it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Yb+%Dy+%Th is not excessive. We have found that when the total amount of %Yb+%Dy+%Th is excessive, undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Yb+%Dy+%Th be less than 28.8% by weight, less than 18.9% by weight, less than 9.8% by weight, less than 8.8% by weight, less than 6.9% by weight, less than 5.8% by weight, less than 4.1% by weight, less than 2.8% by weight, less than 1.2% by weight, and even less than 0.8% by weight. There are also embodiments in which %Yb+%Dy+%Th is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high total content of ytterbium, beryllium, dysprosium, and thorium (%Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th). %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. Therefore, alloys containing %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th in particle form, which generally does not make much sense, make sense in certain embodiments. In some embodiments, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th contributes to improved mechanical properties. In some embodiments, especially when properly composed with elements present in other alloys, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, especially when properly composed with elements present in other alloys, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th contributes to improved corrosion resistance. %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In one embodiment, the total amount of %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th has a positive effect on %Li. In another embodiment, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th includes amounts greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.6 wt%, greater than 1.2 wt%, greater than 2.2 wt%, greater than 3.2 wt%, greater than 5.3 wt%, greater than 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 10.1 wt%. In a different embodiment to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th content is recommended. In another embodiment, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th includes amounts greater than 11.2 wt%, greater than 16.2 wt%, greater than 21.2 wt%, greater than 25.2 wt%, and even greater than 31.2 wt%. In some embodiments, it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th is not excessive. We found that when the total amount of %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th is excessive, an undesirable compromise between corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th be less than 28.8 wt%, less than 18.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 8.8 wt%, less than 6.9 wt%, less than 5.8 wt%, less than 4.1 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.2 wt%, and even less than 0.8 wt%.Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th are either absent or present as undesirable impurities. There are applications in which magnesium alloys benefit from a high total content of ytterbium, beryllium, dysprosium, calcium, yttrium, lanthanum, scandium, and thorium (%Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc). %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc helps facilitate strengthening of the alloy. In some embodiments, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc contributes to improved mechanical properties. In some embodiments, particularly when properly composed with elements present in other alloys, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when properly composed with elements present in other alloys, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc contributes to improved corrosion resistance. %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In one embodiment, the total amount of %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc has a positive effect on %Li. In another embodiment, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc may be present in amounts greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.6 wt%, greater than 1.2 wt%, greater than 2.2 wt%, greater than 3.2 wt%, greater than 5.3 wt%, greater than 7.8 wt%, and even greater than 10.1 wt%. In different embodiments to further emphasize the aforementioned properties, even higher %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc content is recommended. In another embodiment, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc includes amounts greater than 11.2% by weight, greater than 16.2% by weight, greater than 21.2% by weight, greater than 25.2% by weight, and even greater than 31.2% by weight. In some embodiments, it is necessary to control that the total amount of %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc is not excessive. We have found that when the total amount of %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc is excessive, undesirable compromises in corrosion resistance and mechanical properties may occur.In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc be present in amounts less than 28.8% by weight, less than 18.9% by weight, less than 9.8% by weight, less than 8.8% by weight, less than 6.9% by weight, less than 5.8% by weight, less than 4.1% by weight, less than 2.8% by weight, less than 1.2% by weight, and even less than 0.8% by weight. In some embodiments, %Yb+%Be+%Dy+%Th+%Ca+%Y+%La+%Sc may be absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high gadolinium (%Gd) content. %Gd helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Gd, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Gd. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Gd of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Gd content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 0.01% by weight or more, 0.05% by weight or more, 0.1% by weight or more, 1.1% by weight or more, 3.1% by weight or more, 5.1% by weight or more, 10.5% by weight or more, and even 14% by weight or more. In some embodiments, %Gd contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Gd contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Gd contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Gd contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Gd may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Gd has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %Sc disclosed above can also be applied to the %Gd content. Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Gd is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high neodymium (%Nd) content. %Nd helps facilitate strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since this is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Nd, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Nd. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Nd of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Nd content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 0.001% by weight or more, 0.01% by weight or more, 0.055% by weight or more, 0.12% by weight or more, 0.22% by weight or more, 0.6% by weight or more, 1.1% by weight or more, and even 2.1% by weight or more. There are also embodiments where %Nd contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. There are also embodiments where %Nd contributes to the improvement of mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Nd contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Nd also contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Nd may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Nd has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %Sc disclosed above can also be applied to the %Nd content. There are also embodiments in which %Nd is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high samarium (%Sm) content. %Sm helps facilitate strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Sm, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Sm. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Sm of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Sm content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 0.001% by weight or more, 0.01% by weight or more, 0.055% by weight or more, 0.12% by weight or more, 0.22% by weight or more, 0.6% by weight or more, 1.1% by weight or more, and even 2.1% by weight or more. There are also embodiments where %Sm contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. There are also embodiments where %Sm contributes to the improvement of mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Sm contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Sm also contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Sm may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Sm has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to the %Sm content. There are also embodiments in which %Sm is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high praseodymium (%Pr) content. %Pr helps facilitate strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Pr, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Pr. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Pr of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Pr content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 0.001% by weight or more, 0.005% by weight or more, 0.01% by weight or more, 0.055% by weight or more, 0.12% by weight or more, 0.22% by weight or more, 0.42% by weight or more, and even 0.6% by weight or more. In some embodiments, %Pr contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Pr contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Pr contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Pr contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Pr may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Pr has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to %Pr content. Furthermore, there are embodiments where %Pr is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high holmium (%Ho) content. %Ho helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Ho, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Ho. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Ho of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Ho content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 10.6% by weight or more, 12.2% by weight or more, 14% by weight or more, 16% by weight or more, 18% by weight or more, 20.5% by weight or more, 21.1% by weight or more, and even 22.1% by weight or more. There are also embodiments where %Ho contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. In some embodiments, %Ho contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Ho contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Ho contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Ho may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Ho has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to the %Ho content. Furthermore, there are embodiments where %Ho is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high terbium (%Tb) content. %Tb helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since this is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Tb, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Tb. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Tb of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Tb content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 2.1% by weight or more, 2.6% by weight or more, 3.2% by weight or more, 5.2% by weight or more, 8.2% by weight or more, 10.6% by weight or more, 11.1% by weight or more, and even 13.1% by weight or more. There are also embodiments where %Tb contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. There are also embodiments where %Tb contributes to the improvement of mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Tb contributes to improved creep resistance. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Tb also contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Tb may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Tb has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to the %Tb content. There are also embodiments in which %Tb is absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high thulium (%Tm) content. %Tm helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powder and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Tm, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable in the case of %Tm. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Tm of the solid solution with a constant term. In another embodiment, the %Tm content in the solid solution of alloys manufactured in particle form is 10.6% by weight or more, 12.2% by weight or more, 14% by weight or more, 16% by weight or more, 18% by weight or more, 20.5% by weight or more, 21.1% by weight or more, and even 22.1% by weight or more. There are also embodiments where %Tm contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. There are also embodiments where %Tm contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Tm contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, particularly when appropriately combined with other alloying elements, %Tm contributes to improved corrosion resistance in certain applications. %Tm may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Tm has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to the %Tm content. Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Tm is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high erbium (%Er) content. %Er helps facilitate strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powders and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Er, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable to %Er. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Er of the solid solution in a constant term, at the same level as disclosed above for %Ho, which is also applicable to the content of %Er. There are also embodiments where %Er contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. There are also embodiments where %Er contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Er contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Er contributes to improved corrosion resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. %Er may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Er has a positive effect on %Li. The weight percentage of %La disclosed above can also be applied to the %Er content. Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Er is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. There are applications where magnesium alloys benefit from a high lutetium (%Lu) content. %Lu helps facilitate the strengthening of the alloy. This result is surprising, especially since it is also true for some alloys containing %Y. In fact, we have found that when the particles are metal powders and have a high proportion of properly manufactured %Lu, it can be found in more solid solutions, as shown in the case of %La, which is also applicable to %Lu. In some alloys, there are applications where it is more appropriate to control the %Lu of the solid solution in a constant term, at the same level as disclosed above for %Ho, which is also applicable to the content of %Lu. There are also embodiments where %Lu contributes to the improvement of several mechanical properties. There are also embodiments where %Lu contributes to improved mechanical resistance. In some embodiments, %Lu contributes to improved creep resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Lu contributes to improved corrosion resistance, especially when properly combined with other alloying elements. %Lu may also contribute as a three-dimensional element to many of the properties described for other alloying elements. In some embodiments, %Lu has a beneficial effect on %Li. The weight percentages of %La disclosed above can also be applied to the %Lu content. Furthermore, there are embodiments in which %Lu is either absent or present as an undesirable impurity. In some embodiments, lutetium (%Lu) can be partially or completely replaced with europium (%Eu). Also, in some embodiments, lutetium (%Lu) can be partially or completely replaced with promethium (%Pr). We discovered that the relationships between specific alloying elements are important when considering the maximization of structural resistance under combustion and cost-effectiveness. We found that there are embodiments where it is important to establish a relationship between %Ca and %Li. We also found that there are embodiments where it is important to establish relationships between %Ca, %Al, and %Li. In other applications of alloy manufacturing, the alloy contains more than 1.2 wt%, or more than 2.2 wt%, more than 3.2 wt%, more than 5.3 wt%, or more than 7.8 wt% of %Ca. In other applications of alloy manufacturing, the alloy contains less than 11.9 wt%, less than 9.8 wt%, less than 8.8 wt%, and even less than 6.9 wt% of %Ca. This is another embodiment where %Li is contained in amounts greater than 2.3 wt%, or greater than 4.2 wt%, 5.2 wt%, 6.9 wt%, 7.8 wt%, 10.2 wt%, 11.2 wt%, 12.2 wt%, 14.2 wt%, 16 wt%, 18 wt%, or 26 wt%. In another embodiment for balancing different mechanical properties, it is recommended that %Ca / (%Li+%Al) be greater than 0.15, greater than 0.28, greater than 0.56, greater than 0.62, greater than 0.66, greater than 0.76, and greater than 1.1 (wherein %Ca, %Li, and %Al are the atomic weights of calcium, lithium, and aluminum). In yet another embodiment, it is recommended that %Ca / (%Li+%Al) be less than 1.9, less than 1.4, less than 0.98, less than 0.88, less than 0.74, and less than 0.68. In another embodiment, %Ca / %Li must be greater than 0.07, greater than 0.22, greater than 0.52, greater than 0.62, greater than 0.66, greater than 0.76, and even greater than 1.1. In yet another embodiment, it is recommended that %Ca / %Li be less than 1.4, less than 0.98, less than 0.74, less than 0.68, less than 0.58, and even less than 0.48. It has been found that there are also applications where the sum of %Nd and %Gd must not be zero (there must be at least one, and obviously the general proportions described in the previous paragraph apply).Furthermore, it has been discovered that there are applications in which %Y must be present (this applies throughout this specification, but where a specific weight or atomic percentage is not specified, as in the precise proportion description in the previous paragraph, the more general form of description applies. Also, not all proportions of the alloying elements listed are ultimately essential. That is, in this embodiment, %Y must be present and therefore the alloy cannot be used without %Y, but in the aforementioned embodiment, it may be beneficial to include %Sc. That is, embodiments optimized for applications in which %Sc is effective include %Sc, but embodiments without %Sc are also possible in this embodiment). It has also been discovered that there are embodiments in which %Zr must be present. In some embodiments, the inclusion of %Zr is effective in achieving the necessary mechanical properties, and in other embodiments, the %Zr content is greater than 0.06 wt%, greater than 0.1 wt%, greater than 0.31 wt%, or greater than 0.41 wt%. When %Li is greater than 11.1 wt%, the inclusion of %Zr in the alloy is recommended to balance the mechanical properties. While the inclusion of zinc (%Zn) in magnesium alloys is recommended in some applications, it has been found that in other applications it can actually be an impurity. In another embodiment, a %Zn content of 0.1% by weight or more, 0.6% by weight or more, 1.2% by weight or more, 4.2% by weight or more, 6.2% by weight or more, 8.2% by weight or more, or 11% by weight or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Zn content is extremely harmful. In another embodiment, a content of less than 12.8% by weight, less than 9.6% by weight, less than 9.4% by weight, less than 6.3% by weight, less than 4.2% by weight, less than 2.3% by weight, less than 1.8% by weight, less than 0.2% by weight, less than 0.08% by weight, and even less than 0.02% by weight is recommended. To achieve the desired mechanical properties, in another embodiment, a %Zn content of more than 0.04% by weight, more than 0.18% by weight, more than 0.36% by weight, or more than 0.43% by weight is recommended. Clearly, it can be applied to all elements in a particular application, but there may be cases where the nominal value of the content of a particular element is required to be 0%. In certain applications, the use of alloys containing %Ga, %Bi, %Rb, %Cd, %Cs, %Sn, %Pb, %Zn, or %In is particularly noteworthy. Among these, the use of these low-melting-point-promoting elements is especially important. In other embodiments, these elements are used in conjunction with %Ga content exceeding 0.8 wt%, 2.2 wt%, 5.2 wt%, 12 wt%, 21 wt%, or 54 wt%. In some embodiments, the %Ga content in the alloy is exceeding 32 wt ppm, 0.0001 wt%, 0.015 wt%, or 0.1 wt%. Depending on the desired properties of the magnesium alloy, in other embodiments, it is recommended that the %Ga content be less than 30 wt%, 29 wt%, 22 wt%, 16 wt%, 9 wt%, 6.4 wt%, 4.1 wt%, 3.2 wt%, 2.4 wt%, or even less than 1.2 wt%. In some embodiments of any application, %Ga may be harmful or suboptimal for any reason. In such applications, it is recommended that the magnesium alloy be free of %Ga. In some applications, it has been found that all or part of %Ga can be substituted for %Ga+%Bi in the amounts of %Bi specified in this specification. In some applications, total substitution, i.e., the absence of %Ga, is effective. In some applications, it has been found worthwhile to consider partially replacing %Ga or %Bi with %Cd, %Cs, %Sn, %Pb, %Zn, %Rb, or %In in the amounts described above. In some applications, it may be worthwhile to consider the absence of any of the above elements, in which case it can be considered as %Ga+%Bi+%Cd+%Cs+%Sn+%Pb+%Zn+%Rb+%In (i.e., this sum matches the given value, but a particular element may not be present, and the nominal content may be 0%. This is effective in certain applications where the element in question is harmful or suboptimal for any reason). These elements do not necessarily need to be composed in a pure state. Given that the melting points of the alloys in question are sufficiently low, the use of alloys of these elements is often economical. In some applications, it is more effective to use alloys containing these elements directly, rather than composing them separately. There are also applications where the use of particles primarily composed of these elements is worth considering. In such cases, the sum of %Ga+%Bi+%Cd+%Cs+%Sn+%Pb+%Zn+%Rb+%In is, in other embodiments, greater than 52 wt%, or greater than 76 wt%, greater than 86 wt%, or greater than 98 wt%. The final content of these elements in the component depends on the volume fraction used, but is variable within the above range in some applications. A typical example is when liquid-phase sintering is performed at low temperatures using %Sn and %Ga alloys, where there is a high probability of breaking down an oxide film that may contain other particles (usually many particles). The %Sn and %Ga content is adjusted with reference to the equilibrium phase diagram to control the required liquid-phase volume content and the volume proportion of particles in this alloy at various post-processing temperatures. In certain applications, %Sn or %Ga can be partially or completely substituted by other elements in this list (i.e., the alloy may not contain %Sn or %Ga). This is also possible in the case of significant presences of other elements not included in this list, such as %Mg. Furthermore, this applies to recommended alloying elements for a desired alloy in a specific application. It has been found that while manganese (%Mn) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Mn content of 0.1% by weight or more, 0.6% by weight or more, 1.2% by weight or more, 4.2% by weight or more, 6.2% by weight or more, 8.2% by weight or more, or 11% by weight or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Mn content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 12.8% by weight, less than 9.6% by weight, less than 9.4% by weight, less than 6.3% by weight, less than 4.2% by weight, less than 2.3% by weight, less than 1.8% by weight, less than 0.2% by weight, less than 0.08% by weight, and even less than 0.02% by weight is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while zirconium (%Zr) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Zr content of 0.02 wt% or more, 0.1 wt% or more, 0.26 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, or 6.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Zr content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 7.8 wt% or less, less than 6.3 wt% or less, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.8 wt% or less, less than 0.48 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, but there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while boron (%B) is considered an impurity in some applications, its presence is also required in others. Furthermore, it has been discovered that the presence of %B affects the melting point and mechanical properties of alloys. In another embodiment, it is recommended that the %B content be 12 ppm by weight or more, over 37 ppm by weight, 73 ppm by weight or more, and even 130 ppm by weight or more. In yet another embodiment, it is recommended that the %B content be 0.002% by weight or more, 0.01% by weight or more, 0.1% by weight or more, 0.26% by weight or more, 0.3% by weight or more, 0.6% by weight or more, 1.2% by weight or more, 2.2% by weight or more, or 4.2% by weight or more. Conversely, there are applications where the presence of %B is extremely harmful. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 3.8 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.8 wt%, less than 0.8 wt%, less than 0.48 wt%, less than 0.18 wt%, less than 0.08 wt%, less than 0.02 wt%, and even less than 0.002 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, although there may be cases where the nominal value of the content of a particular element is required to be 0%. The inclusion of at least one of %Al, %Zr, %Zn, %Cd, and %Ca contributes to improved mechanical properties, and in other embodiments, it is recommended to include more than 0.01% by weight, more than 0.1% by weight, or more than 0.7% by weight individually or in total. Magnesium alloys contain at least one of %Ca, %Zr, or %Al, and it is recommended to include more than 0.01% by weight, more than 0.1% by weight, or more than 0.7% by weight in concentrations in other embodiments. These are individual or total values. In other embodiments, the alloy contains at least one of %Ca or %Zr, and it is recommended to include more than 0.01% by weight, more than 0.1% by weight, or more than 0.7% by weight in concentrations in other embodiments. These are individual or total values. It has been found that while copper (%Cu) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Cu content of 0.1% or more, 0.6% or more, 1.2% or more, 4.2% or more, 6.2% or more, 8.2% or more, 11% or more, 16.2% or more, or 21.2% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Cu content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 18.8% or more, less than 14.6% or more, less than 9.4% or more, less than 6.3% or more, less than 4.2% or more, less than 2.3% or more, less than 1.8% or more, less than 0.2% or more, less than 0.08% or even less than 0.02% is recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while tantalum (%Ta) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Ta content of 0.02 wt% or more, 0.1 wt% or more, 0.26 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, or 4.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Ta content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 3.8 wt% or more, less than 2.8 wt% or more, less than 1.8 wt% or more, less than 0.8 wt% or less, less than 0.48 wt% or less, less than 0.18 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or less, less than 0.02 wt% or even less. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while vanadium (%V) is considered an impurity in some applications, its presence is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %V levels of 0.02 wt% or higher, 0.1 wt% or higher, 0.26 wt% or higher, 0.6 wt% or higher, 1.2 wt% or higher, 4.2 wt% or higher, or 6.2 wt% or higher are recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %V content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, levels of less than 7.8 wt% or lower, less than 6.3 wt% or lower, less than 4.2 wt% or lower, less than 1.8 wt% or lower, less than 0.8 wt% or lower, less than 0.48 wt% or lower, less than 0.2 wt% or lower, less than 0.08 wt% or lower, and even less than 0.02 wt% are recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal value of a particular element's content is required to be 0%. Nitrogen (%N) is considered an impurity in some applications, while its presence is required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %N content of 0.002 wt% or higher, 0.01 wt% or higher, 0.1 wt% or higher, 0.26 wt% or higher, 0.6 wt% or higher, or 1.2 wt% or higher is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %N content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 3.8 wt% or lower, less than 2.8 wt% or lower, less than 1.8 wt% or lower, less than 0.8 wt% or lower, less than 0.48 wt% or lower, less than 0.18 wt% or lower, less than 0.08 wt% or lower, and even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while silicon (%Si) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Si content of 0.1 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, 6.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, and even 11 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Si content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 12.8 wt% or more, less than 9.6 wt% or more, less than 9.4 wt% or more, less than 6.3 wt% or more, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 2.3 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while iron (%Fe) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Fe content of 0.1 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, 6.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, 11 wt% or more, 16.2 wt% or more, or 21.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Fe content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 18.8 wt% or more, less than 14.6 wt% or more, less than 9.4 wt% or more, less than 6.3 wt% or more, less than 4.2 wt% or more, less than 2.3 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal value of the content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while nickel (%Ni) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. To improve mechanical properties, it is recommended that %Ni content be 0.1% or more by weight, 0.6% or more by weight, 1.2% or more by weight, 4.2% or more by weight, 6.2% or more by weight, 8.2% or more by weight, 11% or more by weight, 16.2% or more by weight, 21.2% or more by weight, or 31.2% or more by weight. Conversely, there are applications where %Ni content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment to balance mechanical properties, it is recommended that content be less than 28.8% by weight, less than 18.8% by weight, less than 14.6% by weight, less than 9.4% by weight, less than 6.3% by weight, less than 4.2% by weight, less than 2.3% by weight, less than 1.8% by weight, less than 0.2% by weight, less than 0.08% by weight, and even less than 0.02% by weight. Clearly, it can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, but there may be cases where the nominal value of the content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while chromium (%Cr) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Cr content of 0.1 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, 6.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, and even 11 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Cr content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 12.8 wt% or more, less than 9.6 wt% or more, less than 9.4 wt% or more, less than 6.3 wt% or more, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 2.3 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while titanium (%Ti) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Ti content of 0.1 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, 6.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, 11 wt% or more, and even 16.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Ti content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 18.8 wt% or more, less than 14.6 wt% or more, less than 9.4 wt% or more, less than 6.3 wt% or more, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 2.3 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. Niobium (%Nb) is considered an impurity in some applications, while its presence is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Nb content of 0.02 wt% or more, 0.1 wt% or more, 0.26 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, or 6.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Nb content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 7.8 wt% or less, less than 6.3 wt% or less, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.8 wt% or less, less than 0.48 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while cobalt (%Co) is considered an impurity in some applications, its presence is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Co content of 0.1 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, 6.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, 11 wt% or more, 16.2 wt% or more, or 21.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Co content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 18.8 wt%, less than 14.6 wt%, less than 9.4 wt%, less than 6.3 wt%, less than 4.2 wt%, less than 2.3 wt%, less than 1.8 wt%, less than 0.2 wt%, less than 0.08 wt%, and even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal value of a particular element's content is required to be 0%. It has been found that while molybdenum (%Mo) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Mo content of 0.1% by weight or more, 0.6% by weight or more, 1.2% by weight or more, 4.2% by weight or more, 6.2% by weight or more, 8.2% by weight or more, and even 11% by weight or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Mo content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 12.8% by weight, less than 9.6% by weight, less than 9.4% by weight, less than 6.3% by weight, less than 4.2% by weight, less than 2.3% by weight, less than 1.8% by weight, less than 0.2% by weight, less than 0.08% by weight, and even less than 0.02% by weight is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while tungsten (%W) is considered an impurity in some applications, its presence is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %W content of 0.1 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, 6.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, 11 wt% or more, 16.2 wt% or more, 21.2 wt% or more, or 31.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %W content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 18.8 wt% or more, less than 14.6 wt% or more, less than 9.4 wt% or more, less than 6.3 wt% or more, less than 4.2 wt% or more, less than 2.3 wt% or more, less than 1.8 wt% or more, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, while applicable to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, there are cases where the nominal value of the content of a particular element is required to be 0%. Hafnium (%Hf) is considered an impurity in some applications, while it has been found that hafnium content is required in magnesium alloy applications. For improved mechanical properties, %Hf content of 0.02 wt% or higher, 0.1 wt% or higher, 0.26 wt% or higher, 0.6 wt% or higher, 1.2 wt% or higher, 2.2 wt% or higher, or 4.2 wt% or higher is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Hf content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 3.8 wt%, less than 2.8 wt%, less than 1.8 wt%, less than 0.8 wt%, less than 0.48 wt%, less than 0.18 wt%, less than 0.08 wt%, less than 0.02 wt%, and even less than 0.002 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while germanium (%Ge) is considered an impurity in some applications, its presence is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Ge content of 0.1 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, 6.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, 11 wt% or more, and even 16.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Ge content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 18.8 wt% or more, less than 14.6 wt% or more, less than 9.4 wt% or more, less than 6.3 wt% or more, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 2.3 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, but there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while cerium (%Ce) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Ce content of 0.1% by weight, 0.6% by weight, 1.2% by weight, 4.2% by weight, 6.2% by weight, 8.2% by weight, and even 11% by weight is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Ce content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 12.8% by weight, less than 9.6% by weight, less than 9.4% by weight, less than 6.3% by weight, less than 4.2% by weight, less than 2.3% by weight, less than 1.8% by weight, less than 0.2% by weight, less than 0.08% by weight, and even less than 0.02% by weight is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while selenium (%Se) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Se content of 0.02 wt% or more, 0.1 wt% or more, 0.26 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, or 6.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Se content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 7.8 wt% or more, less than 6.3 wt% or more, less than 4.2 wt% or more, less than 1.8 wt% or more, less than 0.8 wt% or less, less than 0.48 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, but there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while tellurium (%Te) is considered an impurity in some applications, selenium content is required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Te content of 0.02 wt% or more, 0.1 wt% or more, 0.26 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, or 6.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Te content is highly detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 7.8 wt% or less, less than 6.3 wt% or less, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.8 wt% or less, less than 0.48 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, but there are cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while arsenic (%As) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %As content of 0.02 wt% or more, 0.1 wt% or more, 0.26 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 4.2 wt% or more, or 6.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %As content is extremely harmful. In another embodiment, content of less than 7.8 wt% or less, less than 6.3 wt% or less, less than 4.2 wt% or less, less than 1.8 wt% or less, less than 0.8 wt% or less, less than 0.48 wt% or less, less than 0.2 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or even less than 0.02 wt% is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while antimony (%Sb) is considered an impurity in some applications, its presence is also required in others. For improved mechanical properties, %Sb content of 0.1% by weight or more, 0.6% by weight or more, 1.2% by weight or more, 4.2% by weight or more, 6.2% by weight or more, 8.2% by weight or more, 11% by weight or more, and even 16.2% by weight or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %Sb content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 18.8% by weight, less than 14.6% by weight, less than 9.4% by weight, less than 6.3% by weight, less than 4.2% by weight, less than 2.3% by weight, less than 1.8% by weight, less than 0.2% by weight, less than 0.08% by weight, and even less than 0.02% by weight is recommended. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while oxygen (%O) is considered an impurity in some applications, its content is also required in others. Recommended %O levels are 0.002 wt%, 0.1 wt%, 0.6 wt%, 1.2 wt%, 4.2 wt%, 6.2 wt%, 8.2 wt%, and even 11 wt% or more. Conversely, there are applications where %O content is extremely harmful. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, recommended levels are less than 12.8 wt%, 9.6 wt%, 9.4 wt%, 6.3 wt%, 4.2 wt%, 2.3 wt%, 1.8 wt%, 0.2 wt%, 0.08 wt%, and even less than 0.02 wt%. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in specific applications, although there may be cases where the nominal content of a particular element is required to be 0%. It has been found that while carbon (%C) is considered an impurity in some applications, there are also magnesium alloy applications where carbon content is required. For improved mechanical properties, %C content of 0.002 wt% or more, 0.01 wt% or more, 0.1 wt% or more, 0.26 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, or 4.2 wt% or more is recommended. Conversely, there are applications where %C content is extremely detrimental. In another embodiment for balancing mechanical properties, content of less than 3.8 wt% or more, less than 2.8 wt% or more, less than 1.8 wt% or more, less than 0.8 wt% or more, less than 0.48 wt% or less, less than 0.18 wt% or less, less than 0.08 wt% or less, less than 0.02 wt% or even less. Clearly, this can be applied to all arbitrary elements in a particular application, although there may be cases where the nominal value of the content of a particular element is required to be 0%. We have discovered that there are embodiments in which the microstructure of the alloy is important. In some embodiments of magnesium alloys, the microstructure includes a beta phase. In one embodiment, the microstructure consists of a beta phase and HPC (hexagonal close-packed structure). In other embodiments, the microstructure is mainly beta phase. The microstructure of the alloy contains 52 volume% or more of beta phase. In another embodiment of magnesium alloy, the phase containing HPC microstructure is less than 48 volume%, less than 37 volume%, less than 28 volume%, less than 16 volume%, or less than 8 volume%. In some cases, the microstructure is beta phase. The magnesium alloys disclosed above can be used in the manufacture of lightweight components. The use of the magnesium alloys disclosed above has been found, in some embodiments, to enable the manufacture of structural components with high environmental resistance and high resistance to combustion. In some embodiments, the magnesium alloys disclosed herein are characterized by high structural resistance under combustion. Another embodiment of the magnesium alloy disclosed above is described in detail below. In one set of embodiments, a lightweight structure can be obtained using a magnesium alloy having the following composition, where all proportions are by weight: %Mg > 12%. %Li:1.1-29; %Ca+%Y+%Al=0.5-24; %Be+%Sc=0-2.5; %Zr+%Hf+%Ti=0-2.5; %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb=0‐12; %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta=0‐10; %B+%N+%O+%C=0-2.5; %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb=0‐9; %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb=0-2.4; %Nd+%Gd+%La=0-9; %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th=0‐9; The remainder consists of %Mg and trace elements. In one embodiment, when the magnesium alloy disclosed above is used for a lightweight structure, the composition of the disclosed above describes the overall composition of the inorganic portion of the material. This also applies when different phases or powders are present in different compositions. In some embodiments, only the composition of powders of a type that can ultimately be mixed with other powders to form a powder mixture is described. In other embodiments, only the phases of the material are described. In some applications to balance mechanical properties, the sum of %Ca+%Y+%Al may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Ca+%Y+%Al be 0.5 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, 11 wt% or more, or 16 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can negatively affect the overall properties. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Ca+%Y+%Al be 44% by weight or less, 34% by weight or less, 24% by weight or less, 18% by weight or less, 14% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, or 4% by weight or less. In some applications, the sum of %Be+%Sc may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Be+%Sc be 0.005 wt% or more, 0.05 wt% or more, 0.2 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, or 1.4 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Be+%Sc be 8 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2.5 wt% or less, 1.9 wt% or less, 1.4 wt% or less, 0.9 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some applications, the sum of %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments of mechanical property improvement. The above values ​​for each individual element should always be respected, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, the same applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. In different embodiments, the sum of %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta may be important, and different levels are recommended. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, and in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements may have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 14% by weight or less, 10% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. In some applications, the sum of %Zr+%Hf+%Ti may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Zr+%Hf+%Ti be 0.005 wt% or more, 0.05 wt% or more, 0.2 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, or 1.4 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Zr+%Hf+%Ti be 8 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2.5 wt% or less, 1.9 wt% or less, 1.4 wt% or less, 0.9 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some applications, the sum of %B+%N+%O+%C may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %B+%N+%O+%C be 0.005 wt% or more, 0.05 wt% or more, 0.2 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, or 1.4 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %B+%N+%O+%C be 8 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2.5 wt% or less, 1.9 wt% or less, 1.4 wt% or less, 0.9 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some applications, the sum of %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​for each individual element should always be respected, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb be 0.05 wt% or greater, 0.6 wt% or greater, 1.1 wt% or greater, 2.2 wt% or greater, 5.2 wt% or greater, 8.2 wt% or greater, or 11 wt% or greater. As expected, the same applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 14% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. In some applications, the sum of %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb be 0.005 wt% or more, 0.05 wt% or more, 0.2 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, or 1.4 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb be 8 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2.4 wt% or less, 1.9 wt% or less, 1.4 wt% or less, 0.9 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some embodiments, the sum of %Nd+%Gd+%La may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments to balance the mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Nd+%Gd+%La be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Nd+%Gd+%La be 29 wt% or less, 19 wt% or less, 14 wt% or less, 9 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some embodiments, the sum of %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements may have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 14% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. Another embodiment of the magnesium alloy disclosed above is described in detail below. In one set of embodiments, a lightweight structure can be obtained using a magnesium alloy having the following composition, where all proportions are by weight: %Li:2.2-29 %Ca+%Al=0-14; %Nd+%Gd+%La+%Y+%Be+%Sc=2.1‐19; %Zr+%Hf+%Ti=0-3.5; %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb=0‐9; %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta=0‐9; %B+%N+%O+%C=0-1.5; %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb=0‐12; %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb=0-1.5; %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th=0‐14; The remainder consists of %Mg and trace elements. In some embodiments, this composition describes the overall composition of the material. It also applies when different phases or powders are present in different compositions. In some embodiments, only the composition of a type of powder that is ultimately mixed with other powders is described. Furthermore, in some embodiments, only the phases of the material are described. In some applications, the sum of %Ca+%Al may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments to balance the mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Ca+%Al be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Ca+%Al be 29 wt% or less, 19 wt% or less, 14 wt% or less, 9 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some applications where balancing mechanical properties is required, the sum of %Nd+%Gd+%La+%Y+%Be+%Sc may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Nd+%Gd+%La+%Y+%Be+%Sc be 0.5 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.1 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, 11 wt% or more, or 16 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Nd+%Gd+%La+%Y+%Be+%Sc be 44 wt% or less, 34 wt% or less, 24 wt% or less, 19 wt% or less, 14 wt% or less, 9 wt% or less, or 4 wt% or less. In some applications, the sum of %Zr+%Hf+%Ti may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Zr+%Hf+%Ti be 0.005 wt% or more, 0.05 wt% or more, 0.2 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, or 1.4 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Zr+%Hf+%Ti be 8 wt% or less, 3.5 wt% or less, 2.5 wt% or less, 1.9 wt% or less, 1.4 wt% or less, 0.9 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some embodiments, the sum of %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements may have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 14% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. In some embodiments, the sum of %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​for each individual element should always be respected, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements may have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Ge+%Ce+%Fe+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 14% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. In some applications, the sum of %B+%N+%O+%C may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %B+%N+%O+%C be 0.005 wt% or more, 0.05 wt% or more, 0.2 wt% or more, 1.2 wt% or more, or 1.4 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %B+%N+%O+%C be 8 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2.5 wt% or less, 1.5 wt% or less, 0.9 wt% or less, 0.4 wt% or less, or 0.09 wt% or less. In some applications, the sum of %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb may be important, and different levels are recommended to balance the mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb be 0.05 wt% or greater, 0.6 wt% or greater, 1.1 wt% or greater, 2.2 wt% or greater, 5.2 wt% or greater, 8.2 wt% or greater, or 11 wt% or greater. As expected, the same applies to each individual element, and in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 12% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. In some applications, the sum of %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments for balancing mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb be 0.005 wt% or more, 0.05 wt% or more, 0.2 wt% or more, 2 wt% or more, or 1.4 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb be 8 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2.5 wt% or less, 1.5 wt% or less, 0.9 wt% or less, 0.4 wt% or less, or 0.09 wt% or less. In some applications where balancing mechanical properties is required, the sum of %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th may be important, and different levels are recommended in different embodiments. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, the same applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th be 29% by weight or less, 19% by weight or less, 14% by weight or less, 9% by weight or less, 4% by weight or less, 2% by weight or less, or 0.4% by weight or less. In some embodiments, the sum of %Ca+%Al+%Ti may be important, and different levels are recommended for different applications to balance mechanical properties. The above values ​​should always be respected for each individual element, and in some embodiments, the sum of the elements should be considered. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Ca+%Al+%Ti be 0.05 wt% or more, 0.6 wt% or more, 1.1 wt% or more, 2.2 wt% or more, 5.2 wt% or more, 8.2 wt% or more, or 11 wt% or more. As expected, this also applies to each individual element, so in some applications, excessively large sums of these elements can have adverse effects. In other embodiments, it is recommended that %Ca+%Al+%Ti be 29 wt% or less, 19 wt% or less, 14 wt% or less, 9 wt% or less, 4 wt% or less, 2 wt% or less, or 0.4 wt% or less. In some applications, a specific type of corrosion resistance has been found to be required. This is because magnesium alloys containing or lacking certain elements such as %Fe, %Ni, and %Cu at nominal values ​​of 0% are insufficient. However, special measures must be taken to ensure that the content of these trace elements is sufficiently low. Unfortunately, even magnesium alloys that do not intentionally contain %Cu, %Fe, or %Ni still exhibit residual levels of these elements. While this is not a problem for many applications, in some applications it can have surprisingly adverse effects, requiring costly measures to prevent excessive levels. On the other hand, excessive removal of these elements can impair the alloy's functionality for the application, so care must be taken. In one embodiment, %Fe is recommended to be between 0.00001% by weight and 0.005% by weight. In another embodiment, %Fe is recommended to be less than 0.19% by weight, less than 0.09% by weight, less than 0.009% by weight, less than 0.004% by weight, less than 0.0009% by weight, and even less than 0.0004% by weight. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Fe be greater than 0.0000012 wt%, or greater than 0.000006 wt%, greater than 0.00001 wt%, greater than 0.00006 wt%, greater than 0.00012 wt%, greater than 0.0012 wt%, or greater than 0.012 wt%. In one embodiment, it is recommended that %Ni be between 0.00001 wt% and 0.005 wt%. In one embodiment, it is recommended that %Ni be less than 0.19 wt%, less than 0.09 wt%, less than 0.009 wt%, less than 0.004 wt%, less than 0.0009 wt%, and even less than 0.0004 wt%. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Ni be greater than 0.0000012 wt%, or greater than 0.000006 wt%, greater than 0.00001 wt%, greater than 0.00006 wt%, greater than 0.00012 wt%, greater than 0.0012 wt%, or greater than 0.012 wt%. In one embodiment, it is recommended that %Cu be between 0.00001 wt% and 0.005 wt%.In one embodiment, %Cu is recommended to be less than 0.19 wt%, less than 0.09 wt%, less than 0.009 wt%, less than 0.004 wt%, less than 0.0009 wt%, and even less than 0.0004 wt%. In another embodiment, %Cu is recommended to be greater than 0.0000012 wt%, or greater than 0.000006 wt%, greater than 0.00001 wt%, greater than 0.00006 wt%, greater than 0.00012 wt%, greater than 0.0012 wt%, or greater than 0.012 wt%. In one embodiment, %Fe+%Cu+%Ni is recommended to be between 0.00001 wt% and 0.005 wt%. In one embodiment, it is recommended that %Fe+%Cu+%Ni be less than 0.19 wt%, less than 0.09 wt%, less than 0.009 wt%, less than 0.004 wt%, less than 0.0009 wt%, and even less than 0.0004 wt%. In another embodiment, it is recommended that %Fe+%Cu+%Ni be greater than 0.0000012 wt%, or greater than 0.000006 wt%, greater than 0.00001 wt%, greater than 0.00006 wt%, greater than 0.00012 wt%, greater than 0.0012 wt%, or greater than 0.012 wt%. Another embodiment of the magnesium alloy disclosed above is described in detail below. In one set of embodiments, a lightweight structure can be obtained using a magnesium alloy having the following composition, where all proportions are by weight: %Li:1.3-16 %Ca+%Y+%Al=2.5-19; %Be+%Sc:0‐0.5; %Zr+%Hf+%Ti=0-1.5; %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb=0‐6; %Ge+%Ce+%Ni+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta=0‐3; %B+%N+%O+%C=0-1.5; %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb=0‐8; %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb=0-1.4; %Nd+%Gd+%La=0-4; %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th=0‐3; The remainder consists of %Mg and trace elements. In some embodiments, this composition describes the overall composition of the material. It also applies when different phases or powders are present in different compositions. In some embodiments, only the composition of a type of powder that is ultimately mixed with other powders is described. Furthermore, in some embodiments, only the phases of the material are described. Another embodiment of the magnesium alloy disclosed above is described in detail below. In one set of embodiments, a lightweight structure can be obtained using a magnesium alloy having the following composition, where all proportions are by weight: %Li:4-20 %Ca+%Y+%Al=2-15; %Be+%Sc:0‐0.3; %Zr+%Hf+%Ti=0-1.2; %Cu+%Ni+%Co+%Zn+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb=0‐5; %Ge+%Ce+%Ni+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta=0‐2; %B+%N+%O+%C=0-1.1; %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb=0‐6; %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb=0-1.1; %Nd+%Gd+%La=0-3; %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th=0‐2.5; The remainder consists of %Mg and trace elements. In some embodiments, this composition describes the overall composition of the material. It also applies when different phases or powders are present in different compositions. In some embodiments, only the composition of a type of powder that is ultimately mixed with other powders is described. Furthermore, in some embodiments, only the phases of the material are described. Another embodiment of the magnesium alloy disclosed above is described in detail below. In this case, the alloy can be considered an aluminum-lithium alloy. In one set of embodiments, a lightweight structure can be obtained using a magnesium alloy having the following composition, where all proportions are by weight. %Li:2.3-28 %Ca+%Y+%Mg+%Zn+%Cu=4.5-25; %Be+%Sc:0‐0.5; %Zr+%Hf+%Ti=0-1.5; %Ni+%Co+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb=0‐6; %Ge+%Ce+%Ni+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta=0‐3; %B+%N+%O+%C=0-1.5; %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb=0‐8; %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb=0-1.4; %Nd+%Gd+%La=0-4; %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th=0‐3; The remainder consists of %Al and trace elements. In some embodiments, this composition describes the overall composition of the material. It also applies when different phases or powders are present in different compositions. In some embodiments, only the composition of a type of powder that is ultimately mixed with other powders is described. Furthermore, in some embodiments, only the phases of the material are described. Another embodiment of the magnesium alloy disclosed above is described in detail below. In this case, the alloy can be considered an aluminum-lithium alloy. In one set of embodiments, a lightweight structure can be obtained using a magnesium alloy having the following composition, where all proportions are by weight. %Li:5.5-30 %Ca+%Y+%Mg+%Zn+%Cu=4.0-28; %Be+%Sc:0‐0.3; %Zr+%Hf+%Ti=0-1.2; %Ni+%Co+%Mn+%Si+%Cr+%Nb=0‐5; %Ge+%Ce+%Ni+%Pb+%V+%Mo+%W+%Ta=0‐2; %B+%N+%O+%C=0-1.1; %Bi+%Ga+%Cd+%In+%Sn+%Cs+%Rb=0‐6; %Se+%Te+%As+%Sb=0-1.1; %Nd+%Gd+%La=0-3; %Tm+%Tb+%Dy+%Yb+%Er+%Sm+%Pr+%Ho+%Lu+%Th=0‐2.5; The remainder consists of %Al and trace elements. In some embodiments, this composition describes the overall composition of the material. It also applies when different phases or powders are present in different compositions. In some embodiments, only the composition of a type of powder that is ultimately mixed with other powders is described. Furthermore, in some embodiments, only the phases of the material are described. Any embodiment of the magnesium alloy described above can be combined in any combination with any other embodiment described herein, to the extent that their respective features are compatible. Regarding the use of terms such as "less than," "greater than," "greater than or equal to," "less than or equal to," "from," "up to," "at least," "greater than," and "less than," these terms include the listed numbers and represent a range that can be divided into subranges. One embodiment refers to the use of a magnesium alloy for manufacturing a metal part or at least partially a metal part. The alloy is also used in particulate form. In another embodiment, the alloys disclosed herein are microstructurally defined by particle sizes of 400 micrometers or less, 190 micrometers or less, 90 micrometers or less, 40 micrometers or less, 18 micrometers or less, 8 micrometers or less, 4 micrometers or less, 0.9 micrometers or less, or 0.4 micrometers or less. These values ​​are measured according to ASTME112-13. In another embodiment, the alloys disclosed herein are microstructurally defined as having at least 11 volume%, at least 28 volume%, at least 42 volume%, at least 52 volume%, at least 72 volume%, at least 82 volume%, or at least 96 volume% of a cubic structure. In another embodiment, the percentage of the cubic structure disclosed above is by weight. In another embodiment, the alloys disclosed herein are microstructurally defined by having a reinforcing phase. The reinforcing phase consists of particles whose hardness is greater than the macrohardness of the alloy, taking into account the matrix reinforcing phase and all other components. Furthermore, these reinforcing phase particles are harder than the matrix, precipitates, intermetallic compounds, secondary phases, and even the Laves phase. In another embodiment, the equivalent diameter of the reinforcing phase is at least 400 micrometers or less, 190 micrometers or less, 90 micrometers or less, 40 micrometers or less, 18 micrometers or less, 8 micrometers or less, 4 micrometers or less, 1.9 micrometers or less, 900 nm or less, 400 nm or less, 190 nm or less, and 90 nm or less. In this specification, unless otherwise specified, the equivalent diameter is the diameter of the particle that imparts the same geometric, optical, electrical, or aerodynamic behavior to the spherical particle under test. Some embodiments of the material are characterized by high structural resistance during combustion. This affects all types of materials in this application, and therefore, even single metal alloys. Existing magnesium alloys with refractory properties are characterized by having a higher density than pure magnesium at certain temperatures. In fact, the density of magnesium is 1.74 g / cm³ at 20°C and 1 atm. 3, whereas the density of existing improved refractory magnesium alloys is 1.8 g / cm at this temperature 3 or higher. It was previously believed that this was the only possible approach. This is because fire resistance was only associated with increased oxidation resistance at high temperatures due to reduced reactivity, and in the case of magnesium, reduced reactivity implied an increase in density relative to pure magnesium. One way to parameterize the novelty of some of the alloys disclosed herein is by density. In another embodiment, the density of the alloys disclosed herein (at 20°C and 1 atm) is 1.79 g / cm 3 or less, 1.74 g / cm 3 or less, 1.72 g / cm 3 or less, 1.68 g / cm 3 or less, 1.62 g / cm 3 or less, 1.58 g / cm 3 or less, 1.52 g / cm 3 or less, or 1.44 g / cm 3 or less. In some embodiments, any of the alloys disclosed above having any of the densities disclosed in this paragraph is an alloy that exhibits good fire resistance. What is understood as excellent fire resistance varies depending on the application. In one group of embodiments, significant resistance to combustion is 10.5 Btu / ft as described in FAR 25.853 Part 25 Appendix F Part 2 2This is thought to be for combustion at 1900F with a heat flux of / sec. In one embodiment, the results of the verification run were that the alloy did not burn when it melted, and in another embodiment, the alloy self-extinguished. In another embodiment, the verification results showed that the ignition temperature was above 582°C, above 592°C, above 602°C, above 622°C, above 652°C, above 682°C, above 692°C, above 702°C, above 712°C, above 752°C, above 782°C, or above 802°C. The alloy disclosed herein achieves excellent ignition temperatures despite its very low density. In another embodiment, the verification results showed that the ignition temperature was above 852°C, above 912°C, above 952°C, above 1012°C, above 1122°C, or above 1222°C. In one embodiment, the results of the flammability test described in IGC 04.24.106, corresponding to US FAA, CS25 / JAR 25 / FAR 25§25-853, are considered to indicate good fire resistance. In one embodiment, the alloys disclosed herein pass all tests. The challenge of achieving a highly fire-resistant structure can be solved by the correct composition and microstructure. It appears that a fire-resistant structure can be achieved if the relevant components possess excellent thermal shock resistance. This is because structural components are often subjected to high thermal shock when heated or during fire extinguishing. Since exposure to thermal shock is inversely proportional to thermal conductivity (1 - Poisson's coefficient) and directly proportional to the coefficient of thermal expansion and Young's modulus (also called the modulus of elasticity in this specification), thermal shock resistance can be expressed as follows when comparing materials. [Brief explanation of the drawing]

[0003] [Figure 1] This is one embodiment of reality. [Figure 2] This is one embodiment of reality. [Figure 3] This is a 1:2 scale model of the B-pillar, featuring four main tubular components.

[0004]

number

[0005]

number

[0006] Another embodiment refers to a material comprising organic and non-organic parts, in which elements may be manufactured using molding techniques such as any method disclosed later in this document. The inventors have found that in some embodiments, it is possible to mold a mixture of organic and non-organic elements, provided that certain characteristic temperatures are appropriately selected. In one embodiment, the glass transition temperature, removal temperature, or degradation temperature is appropriately selected, as disclosed later in this document, in particular, in the case of the relationship between the melting point of at least one element of the non-organic part and the characteristic temperature of at least one element of the organic part, such as the thermal deflection temperature. In one embodiment, the material is a moldable material. In one embodiment, the material is a material to be molded. In some embodiments, the organic parts are merely transient until the desired shape is reached and are further removed at least partially. In some embodiments, the organic parts are functional in the molded material and are therefore retained at least partially. The organic portion of the material to be molded may comprise one or more phases and / or elements. In one embodiment, the organic portion comprises an organic phase. In a different embodiment, the organic portion of the material comprises at least one element, at least two elements, at least one related element, and at least two further related elements. In one embodiment, the organic phase comprises at least a polymer. In a different embodiment, the polymer is a photosensitive resin, a thermosetting polymer, a thermoplastic polymer, and further an elastomer polymer. The inventors have found that in some embodiments, the polymer must not be a crystalline polymer in order to obtain the required mechanical properties of the molded material. In one embodiment, the molding method comprises at least one step of additively fabricating an organic portion of a material comprising an element that "cures" when exposed to "appropriate radiation" as later disclosed herein. Furthermore, in a different embodiment, the "cures" material may further comprise a reaction accelerator, a photochromic compound that can be sensitized when exposed to "appropriate radiation" (such as azobenzene, spiropyran, stilbene, fulgites, diarylethenes, etc.), a chromophore that can generate heat when exposed to "appropriate radiation," and further a thermal initiator. In some embodiments, such as when several elements are manufactured in which the organic portion is at least partially retained, and in another example in some elements in which the metal phase with the lowest melting point among the associated phases has a metal phase with a slightly higher melting point, the inventors found it to be extremely important to select organic phases having deflection temperatures above 120°C, above 185°C, above 230°C, above 260°C, above 282°C, above 305°C, above 355°C, above 410°C, above 430°C, and even above 505°C, as measured according to American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi]. In one alternative embodiment, the deflection temperature values ​​disclosed above are measured according to ISO 75-1, 2013 Method B test at a load of 0.45 MPa. The inventors found that in some applications, it is extremely important to select organic phases comprising elements having deflection temperatures exceeding 81°C, 123°C, 153°C, 173°C, 188°C, 203°C, 237°C, 273°C, 287°C, and even 320°C, as measured in different embodiments according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 1.82 MPa. In one alternative embodiment, the organic phase has deflection temperatures above 40°C, above 61°C, above 76°C, above 94°C, above 102°C, above 118°C, above 137°C, above 143°C, and further above 168°C, obtained by any of the following: under a load of 1.82 MPa according to the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07, under a load of 5.0 MPa according to the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07, under a load of 8.0 MPa according to the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07, or further by the ISO 75-1:2013 Method A test under a load of 1.8 MPa. In several applications, the inventors discovered that it is extremely important to select organic phases comprising elements having Vicker softening temperatures exceeding 120°C, 185°C, 230°C, 260°C, 282°C, 305°C, 355°C, 410°C, 430°C, and even 505°C.The inspection conditions for deflection temperature and Vicar softening temperature are disclosed in the final section of this document. In some materials, certain elements or phases may be present in very small amounts within the organic portion of the material. In some cases, their presence is unintended and therefore irrelevant, while in other cases, their presence has a clear functionality and is therefore relevant to some properties but irrelevant to others. In some embodiments, it is possible to define the relevance of a phase or element in an organic portion with respect to the amount of such a type within that organic portion. The relevant element or phase in the organic portion of the material is, in different embodiments, an element or phase that constitutes at least 0.06%, at least 0.6%, at least 1.2%, at least 2.6%, at least 6%, at least 11%, at least 21%, and further 36% by weight with respect to the organic portion of the material. In alternative embodiments, the percentages disclosed above refer to weight percentages with respect to the weight of the material. In alternative embodiments, the percentages disclosed above refer to volume. In some embodiments, the above is a product of several elements, and after the material is formed, the organic portion of the material is retained at least partially. Also, as another example, in some manufactured elements having metallic phases in the non-organic portion of the material, the metallic phase with the lowest melting point among the relevant phases has a slightly higher melting point compared to other relevant metallic phases. The inventors have found in some applications that it is extremely important to select organic phases for relevant elements having deflection temperatures (HDT) in different embodiments, measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 method at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi], above 120°C, above 185°C, above 230°C, above 260°C, above 282°C, above 305°C, above 355°C, above 410°C, above 430°C, and even above 505°C. The test conditions for determining the deflection temperature are disclosed in the last part of this document. In one alternative embodiment, the deflection temperature values ​​disclosed above are measured according to the ISO 75-1:2013 Method B test at a load of 0.45 MPa. The inventors found it extremely important in some applications to select organic phases comprising relevant elements having deflection temperatures exceeding 81°C, 123°C, 153°C, 173°C, 188°C, 203°C, 237°C, 273°C, 287°C, and even 320°C, as measured in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 1.82 MPa. The test conditions for determining the deflection temperature are disclosed in the final part of this document. In alternative embodiments, an organic phase is preferred comprising relevant elements having deflection temperatures exceeding 40°C, exceeding 61°C, exceeding 76°C, exceeding 94°C, exceeding 102°C, exceeding 118°C, exceeding 137°C, exceeding 143°C, and further exceeding 168°C, obtained by any of the following: following the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 1.82 MPa, following the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 5.0 MPa, following the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 8.0 MPa, or further by the ISO 75-1:2013 Method A test at a load of 1.8 MPa.The inventors have found that in several applications and different embodiments, polyphenylene sulfone (PPS), aromatic polyimide (PI), polyethersulfone (PES), polyetherimide (PEI), polyetherketone (PEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), polysulfone (PSU), polyacrylamide (PAM), polycarbonate (PC), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyimide (PI), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), ABS resin (ABS), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polybutylene are used. The inventors have found it extremely important to select an organic phase comprising relevant elements such as butylene terephthalate (PBT), polyamides (PA66, PA610, PA6, PA12), polypropylene (PP), phenol-formaldehyde resin (PF), epoxy resin (EP), polyurethane (PUR), polyester resin (UP), polymethylsiloxane (PDMS), polybenzimidazole (PBI), polybenzimidazole aromatic derivatives, methacrylic acid with polyhydroxy groups, and poly(hydroxybutyl)methacrylic acid. In different embodiments, the inventors have found it beneficial to select an organic phase comprising cyclic butylene terephthalate (CBT) and further anionic polyamide (APA-6). In some applications, particularly when manufacturing wind turbine blades and other large elements, it is beneficial to use polymer materials such as thermosetting polymers (e.g., epoxy resins) or powdered thermoplastic polymers. In the manufacture of large elements, the inventors have discovered that, when using thermoplastic polymers that can be joined by ultrasound, resistance, induction, or other means, and when using molded materials obtained according to the disclosures in this document, it is possible to achieve continuity, including continuous bonding between metal phases at the joint.These include polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate (PHEMA), phthalonitrile, benzoxazine, bismaleimide, cyanate esters, polyester fiberglass systems, molded compounds, bulk molded compounds, polyurethane, insulation materials, mattresses, coatings, adhesives, printing rollers, shoe soles, flooring materials, synthetic fibers, polyurethane polymers, vulcanized rubber, bakelite, phenol formaldehyde resins used in electrical insulators and plastic products, duroplast, plywood, particleboard and medium-density fiberboard, melamine resin, diallyl phthalate (DAP), epoxy resins, polyimides, polycyanurates, molds or mold runners, and further polyester resins. For manufacturing purposes, the inventors found it extremely important to select organic phases comprising relevant elements having degradation temperatures in different embodiments exceeding 120°C, 185°C, 230°C, 260°C, 282°C, 305°C, 355°C, 410°C, 430°C, and even 505°C in several applications. The test conditions for determining the degradation temperature are disclosed in the last part of this document. In alternative embodiments, the degradation temperature may refer to temperatures obtained according to the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials E1131-08, which correspond to mass losses of 10%, 20%, 25%, 45%, 65%, and even more than 65% by weight. The inventors found it extremely important in some applications to select organic phases comprising relevant elements having removal temperatures in different embodiments exceeding 120°C, 185°C, 230°C, 260°C, 282°C, 305°C, 355°C, 410°C, 430°C, and even 505°C. The test conditions for determining the removal temperature are disclosed in the last part of this document. In alternative embodiments, the removal temperature may selectively refer to the temperature obtained at a heating / cooling rate of 0.5°C / min, but according to the test conditions of the American Society for Testing and Materials E1131-08, with the weight of the remaining organic phase in different embodiments being less than 49%, less than 34%, less than 24%, less than 14%, less than 9%, less than 4%, less than 2%, and even less than 0.4% by weight with respect to the initial weight.In one alternative embodiment, the proportions disclosed above are by volume and refer to volume loss in the organic phase. The inventors have found that in several applications, in different embodiments, it is crucial to select an organic phase comprising the relevant element having a deflection temperature well above 0.45 times the melting point (temperature is in Celsius at 0.45*Tm) of the relevant element / phase having the lowest melting point among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic portion of the material, well above 0.65*Tm, well above 0.75*Tm, well above 0.85*Tm, and further well above Tm (where Tm is the absolute temperature at which the first liquid is formed under equilibrium conditions, and in the remainder of this document, equilibrium conditions are similarly applied unless otherwise indicated or made clear). The deflection temperature is measured according to American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 under a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi]. The inventors found that in some applications it is extremely important to select an organic phase comprising relevant elements having glass transition temperatures above 42°C, above 86°C, above 106°C, above 128°C, above 164°C, above 192°C, above 221°C, above 260°C, above 292°C, and even above 320°C in different embodiments. The inventors found that in some applications it is extremely important to select an organic phase comprising relevant elements that are thermoplastic polymers having melting points above 165°C, above 196°C, above 218°C, above 236°C, above 254°C, above 286°C, above 319°C, above 354°C, above 386°C, and even above 410°C in different embodiments. In several applications, the inventors found it extremely important to select organic phases comprising relevant elements having Vicar softening temperatures exceeding 120°C, 185°C, 230°C, 260°C, 282°C, 305°C, 355°C, 410°C, 430°C, and even 505°C. Test conditions for determining Vicar softening temperatures are disclosed in the final part of this document. In some embodiments, the inventors found that the above-mentioned aspects of the phase can also be applied to parts.More embodiments of organic phases / elements that can be present in the material are disclosed later in this document. Testing conditions are disclosed in the final part of this document. A person will determine the type of molding technique to use for a given type of plastic or polymer system, depending on the elements to be manufactured and, likewise, the number of such elements and other economically relevant issues, which will also relate to the shape of the elements, other economic aspects and several other conditions, and likewise to the functionality and dimensional tolerances of the parts he needs, and in this scenario, it is clear to him that he will have one or more possible molding techniques, and if these are clear to him, he will have one or more possible molding techniques, and within this range he will have one or more molding techniques, and several possible polymers can be used, and so when he knows which temperature is relevant to the polymer in order to give it shape through the molding technique he has chosen, and together with all other conditions he understands, he will know the type of molding technique to use and which is relevant to the degradation of the polymer, and therefore he will know without a doubt which temperature is relevant, and when he has decided that, he will know in accordance with this disclosure the type of temperature relationship to be sought in the material by the means described herein. In some embodiments, it is very important that the organic portion of the material is not in excess. In different embodiments, the organic portion should be 68% or less, 48% or less, 38% or less, 34% or less, 28% or less, 24% or less, 18% or less, 14% or less, and further 8% or less by weight with respect to the weight of the material. In other embodiments, there should be a sufficient amount of organic portion of the material to ensure functionality after molding, and this should be especially true in applications where a high proportion of organic portion remains in the molded material. In different embodiments, the organic portion of the material should be 12% or more, 16% or more, 22% or more, 26% or more, 32% or more, 42% or more, 52% or more, 62% or more, 72% or more, 82% or more, and further 92% or more by weight with respect to the weight of the material. In alternative embodiments, volume fraction is relevant. In some embodiments, it is very important that the organic portion of the material is not in excess. In different embodiments, the organic portion should be 68% or less by volume, 48% or less, 38% or less, 34% or less, 28% or less, 24% or less, 18% or less, 14% or less, and 8% or less with respect to the volume of the material. In different embodiments, the organic portion of the material should be 12% or more by volume, 16% or more, 22% or more, 26% or more, 32% or more, 42% or more, 52% or more, 62% or more, 72% or more, 82% or more, and furthermore 92% or more. The non-organic portion of the material may comprise one or more phases and / or elements, and in some embodiments the material may comprise only the non-organic portion. In different embodiments, the non-organic portion of the material comprises at least one element, at least two elements, at least one related element, and at least two further related elements. In different embodiments, the non-organic portion comprises metals, metallic alloys, at least one intermetallic phase, any magnesium-based alloys and other alloys disclosed herein, any magnesium-lithium alloys and / or any aluminum-lithium alloys, and / or any low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloys and / or any low-melting-point aluminum-lithium alloys previously disclosed herein, ceramics, particles, hard particles, and further reinforcing fibers. In different embodiments, the majority of the non-organic portion is metal, the majority is any magnesium-based alloys and other alloys disclosed herein, and / or any magnesium-lithium alloys and / or any aluminum-lithium alloys and / or any low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloys and / or any low-melting-point aluminum-lithium alloys previously disclosed herein, and further majority is ceramic. In different embodiments, the non-organic portion of the material is a metal matrix composite, an intermetallic compound, and further an intermetallic compound matrix composite. Any embodiment of the magnesium alloys and / or low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloys disclosed herein can be combined with any embodiment referring to the non-organic portion of any combination of materials provided, and they are not mutually exclusive. In this document, unless otherwise indicated, the term “majority” refers to the main component of the described portion (e.g., organic portion, non-organic portion, metallic portion, ceramic portion, etc.; for example, a material may consist of 90% organic portion and 10% non-organic portion, with the non-organic portion having 25% ceramic, 25% intermetallic compounds, 30% metallic alloys of any alloy disclosed in this document, such as any magnesium-based alloy and / or any low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy previously disclosed in this document, and 20% other metallic elements, such as materials, which may be described in some embodiments as having a non-organic portion having a majority of alloys disclosed in this document, such as any magnesium-based alloy and / or low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy previously disclosed in this document, however even if the total number of such metals in the material amounts to only 3%, they are the main component within the non-organic portion). In different embodiments, while insufficient to constitute the principal component of the described part, it must be represented in a minimum of 35%, 46%, 52%, 62%, 77%, 86%, and a further minimum of 96% by volume. In one alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by weight. The relevant elements or phases among the non-organic parts of the material are, in different embodiments, elements or phases that are at least 0.06%, 0.6%, 1.2%, 2.6%, 6%, 11%, 21%, and a further 36% by weight with respect to the non-organic parts of the material. In one alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above refer to percentages by weight with respect to the weight of the material. In one alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above refer to percentages by volume. The inventors have found that in some embodiments, the non-organic portion of the material comprises at least one of the magnesium alloys disclosed herein, in one embodiment, one of the magnesium-lithium alloys disclosed herein, in one embodiment, any aluminum-lithium alloy disclosed herein, in one embodiment, a low-melting-point aluminum-lithium alloy disclosed herein, and in one embodiment, at least one of the low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloys disclosed herein. In one embodiment, the magnesium alloy is particulate. In one embodiment, particulate means powder. In one embodiment, the low-melting-point lithium-magnesium alloy is particulate. In one embodiment, particulate means powder. In one particular embodiment, the inventors have found that the non-organic portion of the material comprises at least two different magnesium alloys. In different embodiments, at least one of the magnesium alloys has a lithium content of more than 21%, more than 36%, more than 42%, more than 52%, more than 62%, more than 72%, and more than 81% by weight. In one alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by volume. In some embodiments, particularly when the non-organic portion of the material comprises metal powders with low melting points, the inventors have found that some relationship between melting temperature and density should be satisfied in at least one of the metal powders in the non-organic portion of the material. In different embodiments, the (g / cm³) of those metal powders 3 The melting temperatures (on the Kelvin scale) of metal powders multiplied by their density (at 20°C and 1 atm) are less than 2790, less than 2490, less than 1900, less than 1400, less than 900, and even less than 400 [K*(g / cm³] 3 ) in which the inspection conditions are disclosed in the last part of this document. Other different alloys can also be used in the non-organic portion of the material. The inventors have found it beneficial in several embodiments for the non-organic portion of the material to comprise any of the alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, which is incorporated in this document by reference. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the aluminum alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the aluminum alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, but the %Li content relative to the magnesium alloy is specified in this application. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the aluminum alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895 and at least one of the low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloys disclosed in this document. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the aluminum alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, having the %Li content disclosed in this application relative to a magnesium alloy, and at least one low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy disclosed in this document. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the titanium alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the titanium alloys of PCT / EP2016 / 076895, but the %Li content relative to a magnesium alloy is disclosed in this application. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises at least one of the titanium alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895 and at least one low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy disclosed in this document. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the titanium alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, but having the %Li content disclosed herein relative to a magnesium alloy, and at least one low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy described herein.In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one of the titanium alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, having a high %Li content and a melting temperature of the low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy disclosed herein, as a low-melting-point alloy. Quite surprisingly, in some embodiments, it has been found that even a low %Li content can be used when using a titanium-lithium alloy as the low-melting-point alloy, as long as a somewhat higher pressure (at the levels described herein) is subsequently used in cold-pressure-intensive (CIP), warm-pressure-intensive (WIP), or equivalent processes applied during forming. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises at least two different metal alloys with a sufficiently large difference between their melting temperatures. A sufficiently large difference between their melting temperatures is, in different embodiments, 20°C or higher, 55°C or higher, 82°C or higher, 105°C or higher, 155°C or higher, 205°C or higher, 255°C or higher, 310°C or higher, 410°C or higher, 610°C or higher, 820°C or higher, and even 1050°C or higher. In one embodiment, any magnesium-based alloy and / or any low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy previously disclosed in this document has the highest melting point among the different metal alloys of the non-organic portion. In one embodiment, the two different metal alloys with a sufficiently large difference between their melting temperatures are the alloys disclosed in this document. In one embodiment, a metal alloy such as any alloy disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895 has the highest melting point among the different metal alloys of the non-organic portion. In one embodiment, a metal alloy, such as any alloy disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, has the lowest melting point among different metal alloys of its non-organic portion. In one embodiment, two different metal alloys with a sufficiently large difference between their melting temperatures are the alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895. In one embodiment, both alloys are particulate. In one embodiment, two different metal alloys with a sufficiently large difference between their melting temperatures are powdery. In one embodiment, the alloy with the higher melting point has a greater D50 than the alloy with the lower melting point. In different embodiments, the difference in D50 between two different metal alloys with a sufficiently large difference between their melting temperatures is 5 times or more, 6 times or more, 7 times or more, 8 times or more, and even 11 times or more. The inspection conditions are disclosed in the last part of this document. The inventors have found that in several applications, particularly when the powder is a magnesium-lithium alloy and / or aluminum-lithium alloy, at least one powder in the non-organic portion of the material comprises a beta phase, which has made it easier to mold the material while dramatically reducing the time required in molding. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises at least one metal powder comprising magnesium and / or lithium having at least a beta phase portion, and in a different embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a metal powder comprising lithium having at least 22%, at least 42%, at least 52%, at least 62%, and furthermore all of the present beta phase by volume. In one embodiment, volume refers to the volume of the metal powder, etc. In a different embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a metal powder comprising magnesium having at least 22% beta phase by volume, at least 52%, at least 52%, at least 62%, and furthermore all of the present beta phase. In one embodiment, volume refers to the volume of the metal powder, etc. Considering all the metal particles in the non-organic portion of the material, in a different embodiment, all the metal particles contain at least 42% beta phase by volume of such particles, at least 52%, at least 62%, at least 72%, and furthermore all of the particles contain beta phase. In different embodiments, the metal particles comprise at least 0.6%, at least 2.2%, at least 6%, at least 11%, and further at least 21% beta phase by volume. In this embodiment for some embodiments, it is very important that the material is not sosoloid, because mixing during the process before formability is confirmed would significantly reduce formability. In different embodiments, what has been previously disclosed occurs even when the low lithium content is more than 35%, more than 52%, and further more than 62% by volume of the metal particles, and in different embodiments, if the lithium-containing alloy is a magnesium-based alloy, the low lithium content refers to less than 19%, less than 14%, less than 9%, less than 6%, and further less than 3% by weight with respect to the weight of such particles.In the case of aluminum alloys containing lithium, as previously disclosed in one embodiment, a low lithium content of more than 35%, more than 52%, and even more than 62% by volume of the metal particles occurs even when the lithium content is low, and in different embodiments, a low lithium content refers to less than 49%, less than 39%, less than 19%, less than 14%, less than 8%, and even less than 3% by weight with respect to the weight of such particles. In some applications, the powder is more moldable when the non-organic portion of the material in different embodiments comprises an alloy in which the weight of the alloy contains more than 16%, more than 18%, more than 32%, more than 38%, more than 46%, more than 54%, or more than 67% %Li by weight. The alloy may further comprise at least 0.12% by weight of an element selected from %As, %Sc, %Y, %La, %Th, %Ce, and %Ca. In different embodiments, the alloy may further comprise more than 0.28%, more than 0.56%, or more than 0.78% by weight of %Gd+%Nd+%Sm+%Y+%Pr+%Sc+%Pm+%Eu+%Tb+%Dy+%Ho+%Er+%Tm+%Yb+%Lu+%Th by weight of the alloy. In one embodiment, the alloy may further comprise at least two elements selected from %Ca, %Y, %Al, %Be, %Sc, %Zr, %Hf, %Ti, %La, %Ce, %As and / or %Y, having a total content of at least 0.52%, at least 1.1%, at least 1.64%, and further at least 2.18% by weight of the alloy in different embodiments. In different embodiments, the alloy may further comprise at least 12%, at least 16%, at least 22%, at least 26%, and further at least 62% by weight of %Mg in the alloy. In some embodiments, this alloy is a relevant element among the non-organic parts of the material. In some applications, the powder is more moldable if the non-organic portion of the material in different embodiments comprises a powder mixture having more than 12% by weight of %Mg and less than 18% by weight of lithium. Furthermore, the powder mixture may further comprise one element selected from %As, %Sc, %Y, %La, %Th, %Ce and / or %Ca in different embodiments, in amounts of at least 0.12%, 0.28%, 1.12%, and further 2.2% by weight of the powder mixture. In one embodiment, at least two of these elements are present in the powder mixture. In one embodiment, the powder mixture further comprises, in different embodiments, %Gd+%Nd+%Sm+%Y+%Pr+%Sc+%Pm+%Eu+%Tb+%Dy+%Ho+%Er+%Tm+%Yb+%Lu+%Th in different embodiments, in amounts of weight of the powder mixture. In some embodiments, this powder mixture is a relevant element among the non-organic parts of the material. In some applications, the powder is more moldable when the non-organic portion of the material comprises, in different embodiments, a metallic phase having more than 32%, more than 39%, more than 49%, more than 56%, and even more than 71% by weight with respect to the weight of such alloy. In other applications, the metallic phase further comprises, in different embodiments, at least 12%, at least 16%, and even more than 24% by weight of %Mg, and in one embodiment, the metallic phase further comprises at least two elements selected by total weight from %Ca, %Al, %Be, %Sc, %Zr, %Hf, %Ti, %La, %Ce, %As, and / or %Y. In some embodiments, this metallic phase is the relevant phase in the non-organic portion of the material. In some applications, the powder is more moldable if the non-organic portion of the material comprises, in different embodiments, a metallic phase having at least 12%, at least 16%, at least 22%, at least 26%, at least 27%, at least 32%, and even at least 62% %Mg by weight with respect to the weight of such metallic phase. In some embodiments, this metallic phase is the relevant phase within the non-organic portion of the material. In some applications, the powder is more moldable if the non-organic portion of the material comprises, in different embodiments, a metallic phase having at least 1.6%, at least 2.8%, at least 3.6%, at least 4.2%, at least 6.3%, at least 18.6%, and even at least 32.1% %Al by weight with respect to the weight of such a metallic phase. In some embodiments, this metallic phase is the relevant phase within the non-organic portion of the material. In some applications, when the non-organic portion of the material comprises a metallic phase having at least 32% %Li by weight in different embodiments, the powder is easier to mold, and when all metallic phases present in the non-organic portion of the material are totaled, %Li is less than 18% by weight and %Mg is greater than 12% by weight with respect to the total weight of all metallic phases. In some embodiments, this metallic phase is the relevant phase in the non-organic portion of the material. In some applications, the powder is more moldable if the non-organic portion of the material comprises, in different embodiments, a metallic phase having at least 6%, at least 8%, at least 12%, and even at least 16% %Ga by weight with respect to the weight of such metallic phase. In some embodiments, this metallic phase is the relevant phase within the non-organic portion of the material. In some applications, the powder is more moldable if the non-organic portion of the material comprises, in different embodiments, a metallic phase having at least 12%, at least 16%, at least 19%, and even at least 23% by weight of such metallic phase. In some applications, powders are more moldable if the non-organic portion of the material comprises a metallic phase in which the sum of %Ga+%Bi+%Rb+%Cd+%Cs+%Sn+%Pb+%Zn+%In by weight, in different embodiments, is at least 12%, at least 16%, at least 19%, and even more than 23%. In some embodiments, this metallic phase is the relevant phase within the non-organic portion of the material. In some applications, the performance of the powder is improved when the non-organic portion of the material comprises, in different embodiments, a mixture of metal phases in which %Li is less than 18%, less than 16%, and less than 12% by weight with respect to the total weight of such metal phases. In different embodiments, the mixture of metal phases further comprises %Mg exceeding 12%, more than 16%, more than 24%, and even more than 31% by weight with respect to the total weight of such metal phases. In different embodiments, the mixture of metal phases further comprises %Ca at least 1.2%, at least 1.6%, at least 2.1%, and even more than 3.6% by weight with respect to the total weight of such metal phases. In some embodiments, this metal phase is the relevant phase within the non-organic portion of the material. The inventors have found that in several applications, it is preferable that the non-organic portion of the material comprises at least one particulate magnesium-lithium alloy having a low melting point. For several applications, it is disclosed in this document that at least one of the low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloys is particulate having melting temperatures of less than 390°C, less than 340°C, less than 290°C, less than 240°C, and further less than 190°C in different embodiments. In different embodiments, the non-organic portion of the material comprises relevant elements having melting temperatures of 645°C or less, 580°C or less, 495°C or less, 445°C or less, 395°C or less, 345°C or less, 285°C or less, 245°C or less, 195°C or less, 145°C or less, and further less than 95°C. Testing conditions are disclosed in the last part of this document. In some embodiments, having a very high percentage of non-organic material is beneficial. For some embodiments, this is often true when the organic phase is largely, predominantly, or completely removed within the molded material. When the organic phase is largely or completely retained, in some embodiments a slightly lower content of non-organic material is preferable, and in some embodiments a slightly higher content of non-organic material is beneficial. In different embodiments, the powder mixture provided in the non-organic portion filler of the material should have a relative density of 52% or more, 62% or more, 67% or more, 72% or more, 76% or more, 82% or more, 86% or more, and furthermore 92% or more. Relative density is defined as the ratio of tap density to volume density expressed as a percentage (relative density = [tap density / theoretical density] * 100), where tap density is measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials B527-15 and theoretical density is measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials B962-08. In one embodiment, the powder mixture provided in the filler of the non-organic portion of the material should have an apparent density of 52% or more, 62% or more, 67% or more, 72% or more, 76% or more, 82% or more, 86% or more, and furthermore, 92% or more. Apparent density is defined as the ratio of apparent density to volume density expressed as a percentage (apparent density = [apparent density / theoretical density] * 100), where apparent density (at 20°C and 1 atm) is measured according to American Society for Testing and Materials B329-06, and theoretical density (at 20°C and 1 atm) is measured according to American Society for Testing and Materials B962-08. In some embodiments, the percentage in question is by volume (percentage by volume of the non-organic portion relative to the volume of the material). In different embodiments, the non-organic portion of the material should constitute 52%, 62%, 67%, 72%, 76%, 82%, 86%, and 92% or more by volume. In one embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by weight and refer to the percentage by weight of the non-organic portion relative to the weight of the material. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a powdered metal, and in another embodiment, it comprises a powder mixture (in this document, a powder mixture means a powder made by mixing two or more powders of different chemical components, particle size distributions, particle shape, or combinations thereof, in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials B243-16a). In this document, when referring to powders, D3 refers to the particle size of 3% of the volume of the sample consisting of smaller particles in the cumulative particle size distribution, D5 refers to the particle size of 5% of the volume of the sample consisting of smaller particles in the cumulative particle size distribution, D10 refers to the particle size of 10% of the volume of the sample consisting of smaller particles in the cumulative particle size distribution, D50 refers to the particle size of 50% of the volume of the sample consisting of smaller particles in the cumulative particle size distribution, and D85 refers to the particle size of D90 refers to the particle size that accounts for 85% of the volume of the sample consisting of the smallest particles in the cumulative distribution of particle sizes, D95 refers to the particle size that accounts for 95% of the volume of the sample consisting of the smallest particles in the cumulative distribution of particle sizes, D97 refers to the particle size that accounts for 97% of the volume of the sample consisting of the smallest particles in the cumulative distribution of particle sizes, and D98 refers to the particle size that accounts for 98% of the volume of the sample consisting of the smallest particles in the cumulative distribution of particle sizes. The values ​​D3, D5, D10, D50, D95, D97, and D98 are obtained by laser diffraction according to ISO 13320-2009. In alternative embodiments, the percentages disclosed above are by mass and are denoted as D3m, D5m, D10m, D50m, D85m, D95m, D97m, and D98m. In this document, the particle size of metal powder refers to D50 unless otherwise specified. For some applications, fine powder is preferred. In different embodiments, the powder should have a D50 of 78 micrometers or less, 48 ​​micrometers or less, 28 micrometers or less, 18 micrometers or less, or 8 micrometers or less. For some applications, slightly coarser powder is acceptable or advantageous.In different embodiments, the powder should have D50 of 1900 micrometers or less, 800 micrometers or less, 780 micrometers or less, 380 micrometers or less, 210 micrometers or less, 200 micrometers or less, 190 micrometers or less, 180 micrometers or less, 120 micrometers or less, 90 micrometers or less, and further 45 micrometers or less. In some applications, fine powder is even disadvantageous. In different embodiments, the powder should have D50 of 2 micrometers or more, 6 micrometers or more, 8 micrometers or more, 12 micrometers or more, 22 micrometers or more, 42 micrometers or more, 72 micrometers or more, 122 micrometers or more, 222 micrometers or more, and 312 micrometers or more. In different embodiments, the provisions of this paragraph apply, but D50 is replaced by D90, D95, D97, D98, D10, D5, and further D3. When mixing one or more powders to make a powder mixture, references are made to the particle size of the powder mixture in some embodiments (wherein this document, when one or more powders are mixed, particle size refers to the particle size of a homogeneous mixture of such powders that is considered as a single powder). In one embodiment, any of the above references to D3, D5, D10, D50, D90, D95, D97, or D98 can be further applied to the size of the powder mixture. Even more surprisingly, in some cases it is beneficial to have a mixture of small and large particles, and it is sufficient to ensure that the overall D98 of all the particles used together is sufficiently large. In different embodiments, these are 210 micrometers or larger, 310 micrometers or larger, 410 micrometers or larger, 510 micrometers or larger, 610 micrometers or larger, 810 micrometers or larger, and 1010 micrometers or larger. In different embodiments, what is stated for D98 should be applied to D95, D85, and further to D50. When mixing one or more powders to make a powder mixture, in some embodiments, the particle size values ​​D5, D10, D50, D90, D95, D97, or D98 disclosed above refer to the size of the powder mixture.In the alternative embodiment, the values ​​D5, D10, D50, D90, D95, D97, and D98 disclosed above can be replaced by D5m, D10m, D50m, D95m, D97m, and D98m, respectively. In this document, when a high packing density is desired, a special mixing of non-organic parts or powders is performed. This works remarkably well for surprisingly high values ​​of fillers, even those containing organic parts. In one embodiment, powder mixing having two or more modes is preferred, in another embodiment, powder mixing having three or more modes is preferred, and in another embodiment, powder mixing having four or more modes is preferred. A mode refers to the size value that occurs most frequently. In powder mixing, a mode is defined as the size value that occurs most frequently in a uniform test sample made by mixing powders each having its own mode. In the case of a two-mode mixture, the coarsest fraction has volume fractions (considering only non-organic parts) between 60% and 85%, between 65% and 78%, between 70% and 75%, and further between 71.5% and 73% in different embodiments. In one embodiment, the coarsest fraction refers to the powder fraction having the maximum D90, and in another embodiment, it refers to the powder fraction having the highest D90 / D50 ratio. In the case of the three modes of mixing, the coarsest fraction has volume fractions (considering only the non-organic portion) between 50% and 80%, between 55% and 72%, between 60% and 68%, and between 63.5% and 66% in different embodiments. In one embodiment, the coarsest fraction refers to the powder fraction having the maximum D90, and in one alternative embodiment, it refers to the powder fraction having the highest D90 / D50 ratio. The finest fraction has volume fractions (considering only the non-organic portion) between 2% and 25%, between 5% and 20%, between 7% and 15%, and between 10% and 12% in different embodiments. In one embodiment, the finest fraction refers to the powder fraction having the minimum D50, and in one alternative embodiment, it refers to the powder fraction having the lowest D50 / D10 ratio. In the case of the four modes of mixing, the coarsest fractions, in different embodiments, have volume fractions between 45% and 75%, between 50% and 70%, between 60% and 68%, and further between 58.5% and 63% (considering only the non-organic portion).In one embodiment, the coarsest fraction refers to the powder fraction having the maximum D90, in one alternative embodiment it refers to the powder fraction having the highest D90 / D50 ratio, and the second finest fraction has volume fractions between 2% and 25%, between 5% and 20%, between 6% and 14%, and further between 9% and 11% (considering only the non-organic portion) in different embodiments. In one embodiment, the second finest fraction refers to the powder fraction having the second smallest D50, in one alternative embodiment it refers to the powder fraction having the second lowest D50 / D10 ratio, and the finest fraction has volume fractions between 12% and 0.5%, between 9% and 3%, between 7% and 5%, and between 6.5% and 5.5% (considering only the non-organic portion) in different embodiments. In one embodiment, the finest fraction refers to the powder fraction having the minimum D50, and in one alternative embodiment it refers to the powder fraction having the lowest D50 / D10 ratio. In one embodiment, the inventors found that some degree of relationship should be considered between fraction D10 and the nearest smaller fraction D90. In one embodiment, the inventors found that some degree of relationship should be considered between fraction D5 and the nearest smaller fraction D95. In one embodiment, the inventors found that some degree of relationship should be considered between fraction D3 and the nearest smaller fraction D97. In different embodiments, the relationships must be 7.1 times or more, 8.1 times or more, 9.1 times or more, and 10.6 times or more. With regard to the narrowness of the distribution of each fraction, the inventors found that using the control parameter ND = (D90 - D10) / D50 is a good control method. In different embodiments, ND should be less than 0.8, less than 0.58, less than 0.4, less than 0.18, less than 0.08, and even less than 0.038. In one embodiment, within the definition of ND, D90 is replaced by D97 and D10 is replaced by D3.A very surprising observation is that when the fraction with the smallest size is not centered on the target D50 but is just smaller than the desired D50 because it is a cut tail of the normal distribution rather than a narrow normal distribution, the achievable relative density is higher (for example, a mixture of fraction 1: 600+ / -25 micrometers and fraction 2: <45 micrometers can reach a higher relative density than a mixture of fraction 1: 600+ / -25 micrometers and fraction 2: 45+ / -5 micrometers). Therefore, in such cases, ND control is performed for all fractions except the finest fraction, the D97 criterion is applied but the ND criterion is not applied, and rather NDS = (D97 - D50) / (D50 - D3) is applied. In different embodiments, NDS should be less than 0.9, less than 0.8, less than 0.68, and even less than 0.49. What is described here extends to all mixtures of particulate powders or materials in this document where a high relative density is advantageous. Surprisingly, for some materials, if the finest fraction has very fine particles, the density of the filler decreases sharply. Therefore, for some applications, the finest fraction should limit the finest particle size. In different embodiments, the D5 of the finest fraction should be greater than 0.6 micrometers, greater than 1.2 micrometers, greater than 3.2 micrometers, greater than 5.3 micrometers, greater than 8.1 micrometers, greater than 11 micrometers, greater than 16 micrometers, and even greater than 21 micrometers. In different embodiments, D5 in the above statement should be replaced by D10, and in other embodiments by D3. In one embodiment, the finest fraction refers to the powder fraction having the minimum D50, and in one alternative embodiment, it refers to the powder fraction having the lowest D50 / D10 ratio. When mixing one or more powders to make a powder mixture, in some embodiments the particle size values ​​ND, NDS, D3, D5, D10, D50, D95, and D97 disclosed above refer to the size of the powder mixture.In alternative embodiments, the values ​​D3, D5, D10, D50, D95, and D97 disclosed above can be replaced by D3m, D5m, D10m, D50m, D95m, and D97m, respectively. In some applications, the powder should be extremely spherical and the particle size distribution should be very narrow. The sphericity of the powder is a dimensionless parameter defined as the ratio of the surface area of ​​the particle to the surface area of ​​a sphere having the same volume as the particle. Sphericity is determined by dynamic image analysis. In different embodiments, it is desirable for the powder to have a sphericity greater than 0.53, greater than 0.76, greater than 0.86, and even greater than 0.92. When high compression of metal nanoparticles is desired, in different embodiments, metal powders with high sphericity greater than 0.92, greater than 0.94, greater than 0.98, and even greater than 1 are often desirable. With regard to sphericity, for some applications, it can be evaluated for the majority of the powder with respect to the average sphericity of the most spherical particles, and in different embodiments, 60%, 78%, 83%, and even 96% or more of the volume of powder used should be considered the average to be calculated. In one embodiment, the metal powder is spherical. In one embodiment, a spherical powder having any of the particle size values ​​(D3, D5, D10, D50, D85, D90, D95, D97, D98, ND, or NDS) of this paragraph is disclosed above. In some embodiments, the values ​​disclosed above refer to sphericity and particle size of the powder mixture. For some applications, excessive sphericity is disadvantageous due to interference with sinterability or other reasons. In different embodiments, preferred sphericities of less than 0.94%, less than 0.88%, less than 0.68%, and even less than 0.48% may be advantageous. In one embodiment, the particles are irregular. In one embodiment, the metal powder is irregular (the term irregular means any particles having corners, sharp edges, and angular protrusions). In one embodiment, the powder is irregular and has one of the particle size values ​​disclosed above in this paragraph (D3, D5, D10, D50, D85, D90, D95, D97, D98, ND, or NDS). In some embodiments, the values ​​disclosed above refer to the size of the irregularly shaped powder mixture. In some embodiments, it has been found that the cooling rate of the powder should be controlled, although it is just as important as the particle size. In different embodiments, the cooling rate of the powder during manufacturing should be set to 11K / s or higher, 110K / s or higher, 1100K / s or higher, 11000K / s or higher, 1100000K / s or higher, or 1100000K / s or higher. In this document, there are several embodiments comprising organic and particulate non-organic parts, and in some embodiments, special attention must be paid to the fraction of one of the components. In most embodiments, volume fractions are used, but in some embodiments, weight fractions are used. For these embodiments to which references to weight fractions are made, there are automatically parallel embodiments to which the expressed fractions should be interpreted as volume fractions, even if the same restrictions apply. This is especially true for different embodiments to which the density of the particulate material or powder to which the restrictions apply is 1.4 times, 2.2 times, 3.2 times, 5.2 times, and even 6.4 times higher than the density of the organic part when considered as a whole. There are several applications that benefit from lightweight construction. Well-known examples include structural elements or parts that are damaged by certain types of movement, such as moving parts of transport vehicles or machinery. Furthermore, stationary structural elements can also benefit from lightweight construction. Among the many elements that benefit from lightweight construction, the list of performance specifications is quite diverse. While most elements share the requirement of not failing under applied loads, given the highly diverse characteristics of those loads, the concept of not failing can vary considerably for different elements, such as being unbulky, strain-limited, and crack-free, all of which are combined with the lowest possible associated weight. Beyond this largely shared requirement, all applications have a list of many additional requirements or specifications. Some require specific electrical or magnetic operation, others have several temperature requirements relating to heat transport, temperature requirements (high or low), temperature distribution requirements, etc., and many have appearance requirements such as roughness and color, and the list continues to grow. The inventors have found that by observing certain rules and constraints, as described in this document, the advantages of molded lightweight construction described in this document can be obtained. The rules and restrictions set forth in this document restrict a certain degree of freedom for designers who use the invention to manufacture specific elements for specific applications, but leave a certain degree of freedom for designers / users of the invention, providing the remaining requirements for a given application in the best possible compromise. A certain degree of freedom is provided to meet other relevant requirements through some flexibility in specific choices such as the organic and non-organic parts of the material and the manufacturing method, but this is always provided within the guidelines of this document in order to obtain the relevant benefits. Some embodiments are as follows: In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises any magnesium-based alloys previously disclosed herein and / or any low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloys previously disclosed herein having more than 32% powdered %Li by weight and a D50 of 800 micrometers or less. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises any magnesium-based alloy and / or low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy previously disclosed herein, such as any low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy previously disclosed herein, having more than 32% %Li by weight with respect to the weight of any magnesium-based alloy and / or low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy previously disclosed herein, and not lacking %Mg, and having a D50 of 120 micrometers or less. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a powder mixture having a D50 of 800 micrometers or less, comprising an alloy having at least 32% %Li by weight with respect to the weight of the alloy, wherein the powder mixture has less than 18% %Li and more than 12% %Mg by weight with respect to the weight of the powder mixture. In one embodiment, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a powder mixture having a D50 of 800 micrometers or less, comprising an alloy having at least 32% %Li by weight with respect to the weight of the alloy, wherein the powder mixture has less than 18% %Li and more than 12% %Mg by weight with respect to the weight of the powder mixture, and within the powder mixture there is one powder type having a D50 at least three times greater than the D50 of another powder type. Due to the densification mechanisms often used during molding, the inventors have found that for several applications, it is beneficial to use materials containing hard particles or reinforcing fibers to impart specific tribological behavior and / or increase mechanical properties. In this sense, several applications benefit from the use of materials containing hard particles or reinforcing fibers, where the volume of hard particles relative to the volume of the material is 2% or more, 5.5% or more, 11% or more, and even 22% or more by volume in different embodiments. These hard particles are not necessarily incorporated separately, but may be incorporated at a different stage or synthesized during the process. Typical hard particles are those of high hardness. In different embodiments, the hard particles used are diamond, cubic boron nitride (cBN), oxides (aluminum, zirconium, iron, etc.), nitrides (titanium, vanadium, chromium, molybdenum, etc.), carbides (titanium, vanadium, tungsten, iron, etc.), borides (titanium, vanadium, etc.), and mixtures thereof, and typically any particle has hardnesses of 11 GPa or more, 21 GPa or more, 26 GPa or more, and even 36 GPa or more in different embodiments. The inventors have found that the use of whiskers and other ceramic fibers in the material may also be beneficial for some applications of the molded materials disclosed herein. For some applications, recycled shredded carbon fiber reinforced plastic (usually with a polyurethane matrix) may also be advantageously used instead of fibers in one embodiment. In some embodiments comprising powders, the inventors have found that some powders behave very differently depending on whether they are exposed to oxygen or not. In some embodiments, the difference is due to a different gas. In one embodiment, the powder is exposed to an oxidizing atmosphere. In one embodiment, the organic part also has the functionality to prevent the powder surface from coming into direct contact with air. In one embodiment, the organic part also has the functionality to prevent the powder surface from coming into direct contact with oxygen. In one embodiment, upon heating, the organic part releases a gas that reacts at least partially with at least one of the incorporated powder surfaces. In one embodiment, during debinding, the organic part reacts at least partially with at least one of the incorporated powder surfaces. In one embodiment, upon decomposition, the organic part releases a gas that reduces at least partially with at least one of the incorporated powder surfaces. In one embodiment, at least one of the powder species is deformed before mixing with the organic part. In one embodiment, at least one of the powder species is reduced before mixing with the organic part. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has a noble gas or a mixture thereof as its main element. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has nitrogen as its main element. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has gaseous hydrocarbons as its main element. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has carbon dioxide as its main element. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has a gas with carbon bridges as its main element. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has hydrogen as its main element. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has a gas containing halogens as its main element. In different embodiments, the halogens include fluorine, chlorine, and bromine, and in one embodiment, the halogen-containing gas is FS6. In one embodiment, the protective or protected atmosphere has a gas containing sulfur as its main element, and in one embodiment, it has a gas containing phosphorus. In different embodiments, the protective or protected atmosphere includes nitrogen, gaseous hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, gas with carbon bridges, hydrogen, and a gas containing halogens.In different embodiments, halogens include fluorine, chlorine, and bromine. In one embodiment, the halogen-containing gas is FS6. In different embodiments, the protective or protected atmosphere includes a sulfur-containing gas and a phosphorus-containing gas. In different embodiments, the reducing atmosphere includes, as its main elements, nitrogen, gaseous hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, carbon bridged gases, hydrogen, and halogen-containing gases. In different embodiments, halogens include fluorine, chlorine, and bromine. In one embodiment, the halogen-containing gas is FS6. In different embodiments, the reducing atmosphere includes, as its main elements, a sulfur-containing gas, a phosphorus-containing gas, nitrogen, gaseous hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, carbon bridged gases, and hydrogen, and in one embodiment, a halogen-containing gas. In different embodiments, halogens include fluorine, chlorine, and bromine, and in one embodiment, the halogen-containing gas is FS6. In one embodiment, the reducing atmosphere includes a sulfur-containing gas, and in one embodiment, a phosphorus-containing gas. The main elements refer to elements that, in some embodiments, constitute at least 6%, 11%, 16%, 22%, 26%, and further 36% by volume with respect to the total volume of the gas. In alternative embodiments, the percentages disclosed above are by weight. More embodiments of non-organic phases / elements that can be present in the material will be disclosed later in this document. Some of the materials described in this application are based on the inventor's best knowledge, which is not known in the art, and are therefore novel in themselves. These are the result of combinations of different embodiments. Some examples are given. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having a relevant element having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 185°C, and the non-organic portion comprising a metallic phase having at least 16% %Li by weight with respect to the weight of the metallic phase and a metallic phase having at least 12% %Mg by weight with respect to the weight of the metallic phase. The material having non-organic components comprises a metallic phase containing at least 32% by weight of %Li, and when all present metallic phases (including intermetallic phases) are added together, %Li is less than 18% by weight of the total weight of the metallic phase, %Mg is greater than 12% by weight of the total weight of the metallic phase, and %Ca is greater than 1.2% by weight of the total weight of the metallic phase. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having relevant elements having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 185°C, and the non-organic portion comprising a powder mixture having a D50 of 800 micrometers or less. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having relevant elements having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 230°C, the non-organic portion comprising a powder mixture having D50 of 120 micrometers or less and at least one metallic interphase, and the material further comprises fiber reinforcement. Organic materials containing the relevant elements have a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [0.66 psi] at at least 185°C, and a one-time radiation dose of at least 0.26 J / cm² at frequencies above 0.12 THz. 2 When exposed to radiation, polymerization can be achieved with a conversion factor of 12% or more. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having relevant elements having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 185°C, the non-organic portion comprising a powder mixture having a D50 of 1900 micrometers or less, and the material further comprising carbon nanotubes stretched by mechanical action. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having relevant elements having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 185°C, the non-organic portion comprising a powder mixture having a D50 of 1900 micrometers or less, and the material further comprising fiber reinforcement. The material has organic and non-organic parts, with the non-organic part accounting for more than 52% by volume. The non-organic part comprises a powder mixture having a D50 of 1900 micrometers or less, and the non-organic part comprises gallium. The material is further reinforced with fibers. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having relevant elements having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 185°C, the non-organic portion comprising a powder mixture having a D50 of 1900 micrometers or less, the material further comprising fiber reinforcement, and the non-organic portion having 0.6% or more %Ga by weight relative to the weight of the non-organic portion. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having relevant elements having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 230°C, the non-organic portion comprising a powder mixture having a D50 of 1900 micrometers or less, and the material further comprising fiber reinforcement comprising carbon nanotubes stretched during the manufacturing process of the molded material. The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion having a relevant element having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 185°C, and the non-organic portion comprising a metallic phase having a melting temperature of 580°C or less. In alternative embodiments, in the materials disclosed above, the thermal deflection temperature of the relevant element of the organic portion of the material can be replaced by either the glass transition temperature, or the degradation temperature, or the melting temperature of such relevant element of the organic phase. The test conditions for thermal deflection temperature are disclosed in the final part of this document. Other embodiments are as follows: The material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion, the organic portion comprising elements having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] which is 0.45 times higher than the melting temperature (0.45 * Tm) of at least one element in the non-organic portion of the material. A material in which the relevant elements constitute at least 0.6% by weight of the material is disclosed above. A material in which the relevant elements constitute at least 11% by weight of such portion of the material is disclosed above. A material in which the non-organic portion of the material constitutes at least 52% by weight of the material is disclosed above. The material disclosed above comprises a metallic phase having a deflection temperature of at least 185°C and a non-organic portion having a melting temperature of less than 590°C. In the material disclosed above, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a metallic phase having at least 16% by weight of %Li with respect to the weight of the metallic phase. In the materials disclosed above, the non-organic portion of the material comprises one or more metallic phases, the non-organic portion comprises a metallic phase having at least 32% by weight of %Li, and when all metallic phases in the non-organic portion of the material are added together in the non-organic portion of the material, %Li is less than 18% by weight with respect to the weight of the non-organic portion, and %Mg is greater than 12% by weight with respect to the weight of the non-organic portion. In the materials disclosed above, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a metallic phase having at least 12% by weight of %Ga+%Bi with respect to the weight of the non-organic portion. In the materials disclosed above, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a powder mixture having a D50 of 1900 micrometers or less. In the materials disclosed above, the non-organic portion of the material comprises a mixture of at least two powders in which one powder has a D50 at least three times greater than the D50 of the other powder in the mixture. In the materials disclosed above, the material further comprises fiber reinforcement comprising carbon nanotubes stretched during the manufacturing process of the material. In the material disclosed above, the non-organic portion of the material comprises organic elements whose glass transition temperature (Tg) increases by 55°C or more when subjected to a transformation treatment. In the material disclosed above, the material comprises at least 11% particles by volume.In the materials disclosed above, the organic material comprises non-organic particles that are susceptible to polymerization when exposed to radiation at frequencies between 0.32 THz and 19 THz. The materials disclosed above have a conversion of more than 12% at a depth of 2560 micrometers or more below the surface of the material when exposed to radiation above 0.82 THz. In alternative embodiments, in the materials disclosed above, the thermal deflection temperature of the relevant elements of the organic portion of the material can be replaced in different embodiments by either the glass transition temperature, or the degradation temperature, or the melting temperature of such relevant elements of the organic phase. Any material disclosed herein is particularly suitable in some embodiments for use in the methods disclosed herein to produce molded materials having excellent weight and to achieve ratios in an economical manner, especially for lightweight structures. The inventors have found that it is possible to mold the material using additive manufacturing or any other similar method and to expose this molded material to pressure and temperature. In some embodiments, the molded material is further subjected to debinding and / or compaction before obtaining the desired molded material. There are yet another embodiment in which the molded material undergoes further steps such as thermomechanical treatment or machining before obtaining the desired molded material. This method involves the following steps: Step 1. Take the ingredients. Step 2. Shape the material using molding technology. Step 3. The molded material obtained in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. and optionally Step 4. The molded material obtained in Step 3 undergoes a binder removal process. Step 5. The molded material obtained in Step 3 or 4 undergoes a compaction process. The methods should be considered as different embodiments for all materials disclosed and taken in this document. In one set of embodiments, the material taken in step 1 comprises the material described in PCT / EP2016 / 076895. In one set of embodiments, the material taken in step 1 is the material described in this document, with at least a portion of the non-organic portion replaced by the non-organic material as described in PCT / EP2016 / 076895. In one set of embodiments, the material in step 1 comprises at least one of the alloys disclosed in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, which are incorporated in this document by full reference. In some embodiments, the material comprising the organic and non-organic parts provided in step 1 is any material disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the material comprises at least one magnesium alloy disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the material comprises at least one low-melting-point magnesium-lithium alloy disclosed herein. Thus, any embodiment relating to the materials disclosed herein is usable within this method and can be combined with any embodiment of this method in any combination, provided they are not mutually exclusive. As previously disclosed, the inventors have found that the same method described herein can be applied to materials described in PCT / EP2016 / 076895, which constitute a particular embodiment. In one embodiment, at least one of the metal alloys of PCT / EP2016 / 076895 is used as an organic element of the organic portion of the material. In one embodiment, one of the aluminum alloys of PCT / EP2016 / 07689. Considering the remaining percentage relative to the original amount, as described, in different embodiments, the remaining organic portion should be less than 49%, less than 34%, less than 24%, less than 14%, less than 9%, less than 4%, less than 2%, and even less than 0.4% by volume. In one alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by weight. In one embodiment, the organic portion is left only to a trace level. In one embodiment, the organic portion is completely removed. In some embodiments, there should be enough organic portion to ensure functionality. In some embodiments, it is beneficial to reduce the organic portion to as little as possible. In different embodiments, at least 35%, at least 45%, at least 56%, at least 66%, at least 76%, and even at least 82% by weight of the organic portion should be left. In some embodiments, even slight degradation of the organic portion should be prevented. In different embodiments, at least 86%, at least 92%, at least 96%, at least 97%, and even at least 99% by weight of the organic portion should be left. In some embodiments, volume percentages are more relevant. In different embodiments, at least 35%, at least 45%, at least 56%, at least 66%, at least 76%, and even at least 82% of the organic portion by volume should be left. In some embodiments, even slight degradation of the organic portion should be prevented. In different embodiments, at least 86%, at least 92%, at least 96%, at least 97%, and even at least 99% of the organic portion by volume should be left. In some embodiments, the organic portion is largely or completely removed in the resulting molded material. In some embodiments, the organic portion is largely or completely retained. In one embodiment, the percentage of the portion to be left is calculated as the remaining fraction of the portion, i.e., the amount of the portion is divided by the original amount of the portion and expressed as a percentage. In one embodiment, this is done by measuring the kilograms of the portion per cubic meter of the element.As a helpful example, suppose an element is manufactured from a material having 400 kg of organic matter per cubic meter of material. After the relevant process, only 10 kg of organic matter remains per cubic meter of the element (weight and volume are often measured and converted in different units), thus leaving 2.5% of the organic matter. The volume control does not have to be 1 m³. In different embodiments, the volume control can be liters, cubic centimeters, cubic inches, or cubic millimeters. In one embodiment, the remaining portion is calculated as the volume of such portion of the total volume of the material, and the process is continued in the same manner (dividing the final amount by the original amount and expressing the result as a percentage). In one embodiment, a method comprising the step of particle injection molding (PIM) being a molding technique (particles P may be metal M, ceramic C, intermetallic compounds, or any other), and a step comprising cold isostatic pressing (CIP), warm isostatic pressing (WIP), or a similar method, can be combined into one by using at least one relevant element having a metal alloy, such as any metal alloy disclosed herein, having a sufficiently low melting temperature (at the level described herein), ultimately slightly increasing the process time of the molding method, thereby omitting cold isostatic pressing, warm isostatic pressing, or a similar method. In different embodiments, the molding technique is an additive manufacturing (AM) molding technique such as, but is not limited to, 3D printing, inkjet methods, S-print, M-print techniques, techniques in which concentrated energy is used to generate a molten pool in which raw materials (powder or wire materials) are stored using a laser (laser deposition and laser compaction), arc or E-beam heat sources (metal direct deposition and electron beam direct melting), fused deposition modeling (FDM) material jetting, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), selective laser melting (SLM), electron beam melting (EBM), selective laser sintering (SLS), stereolithography (SLA), and digital photolithography (DLP), and other or any other advanced additive manufacturing techniques. In some embodiments, additive manufacturing includes techniques capable of printing protruding features without the need for auxiliary materials. In different embodiments, the molding technique is polymer molding, metal injection molding (MIM), particle injection molding (PIM), injection molding, compression molding, thermoforming, or any other similar technique. In one embodiment, any method described in this document as applicable to PIM molding technology (particle injection molding) can be applied to any molded material manufactured by a similar process and may be any manufacturing method involving a molding die or tool and a method of applying pressure to the material manufactured in the die or tool (by injection, by compression, by extrusion, etc.). In different embodiments, the molding technique used in step 2 is an additive manufacturing (AM) molding technique using wire, rod, filament or any extrudeable shape, which may be conceptually described as fused deposition modeling (FDM). In one embodiment, the materials in steps 1 and 2 are liquid (suspension, mixture, etc.). In one embodiment, the materials in steps 1 and 2 are liquid and polymerizable or curable under exposure to one of the wavelengths described herein. In different embodiments, the molding techniques used in step 2 include additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques using activators to promote binding, additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques using masking materials to delay or hinder binding, additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques in which several fluids are ejected onto a base material through a small opening, additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques in which several fluids are ejected onto a powder-like base material through a small opening, additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques in which several fluids are ejected onto an assembled molded material through a small opening, additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques based on polymerization or curing by exposure to radiation of a certain wavelength or a combination of wavelengths, additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques based on stereolithography (SLA), additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques based on the principle of two-photon stereolithography, additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques based on micro-stereolithography, any additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques, and additive manufacturing (AM) molding techniques having the ability to print protruding features without the need for auxiliary materials. In one embodiment, the material in steps 1 and 2 comprises a polymer that can be injected. In different embodiments, the methods used in step 2 are manufacturing methods based on polymer injection comprising the material, manufacturing methods based on PIM (particle injection molding), and manufacturing methods based on MIM (metal injection molding). In one embodiment, any other method similar to additive manufacturing (AM), particle injection molding (PIM), or metal injection molding (MIM) may be used to shape the material. Several embodiments of the molding technique, including additive manufacturing (AM), are disclosed in more detail later in this document.Accordingly, any embodiment of any additive manufacturing (AM) technique disclosed throughout this document may be used in this method and may be combined with any embodiment of this method without restriction, provided that they are not incompatible. In one embodiment, the material in steps 1 and 2 is a wire, rod, filament, or any extrudeable shape. In one embodiment, the material in steps 1 and 2 is a wire, rod, filament, or any extrudeable shape, which is mechanically stretched during manufacturing and / or before it is incorporated into the manufactured molded material. The molded material obtained in step 2 is subjected to a process involving pressure and temperature. In different embodiments, the molded material is subjected to a process in step 3 involving temperatures exceeding 0.35*Tm, 0.45*Tm, 0.52*Tm, 0.61*Tm, 0.69*Tm, 0.74*Tm, and further exceeding 0.86*Tm, where Tm refers to the melting temperature of the relevant phase or element having the lowest melting temperature in the non-organic portion of the material. The inventors have found that in different embodiments, the material comprises a metallic phase and / or element having a solidification temperature range (where liquid and solid coexist), the molded material is subjected to temperatures exceeding Tm (melting temperature) of the relevant phase or element having the lowest melting temperature in the non-organic portion of the material, and further exceeding 1.1*Tm. In some applications, when the material comprises a powder having a liquid phase, even without a solidification range, the temperatures used in some embodiments are above 1.2*Tm and further exceeding 1.5*Tm. The testing conditions are disclosed in the final section of this document. A highly beneficial process for Step 3 is the application of WIP (Warm Isostatic Pressing). Warm isostatic pressing (WIP) is generally only meaningful if the pressure is applied for several minutes, as is the case with cold isostatic pressing (CIP). Applying pressure (or temperature in the case of warm isostatic pressing (WIP)) for longer periods often degrades the properties, and in most cases the competitiveness of the molded material becomes less than that of others. In some embodiments, longer process times have been found to be surprisingly beneficial, and in some embodiments even essential. In different embodiments, the process times for warm isostatic pressing (WIP) are 36 minutes or longer, 66 minutes or longer, 106 minutes or longer, 226 minutes or longer, 246 minutes or longer, and even 506 minutes or longer. In one embodiment, the pressure is not applied continuously, but rather in cycles of high pressure. In one embodiment, the pressure is not applied continuously, but rather in a set of pulses. In one embodiment, the pressure is not held continuously. In one embodiment, the temperature is applied through temperature control of a fluid acting as a pressure transmitter. In one embodiment, pressure is applied first, and once a certain level is reached, then temperature is applied. In another embodiment, once a certain temperature is reached, then pressure is applied first. In one set of embodiments, what is stated for warm isostatic pressurization (WIP) is extendable to cold isostatic pressurization (CIP) or any other process that applies pressure. In one embodiment, manufacturing step 3 comprises a process in which temperature and pressure are simultaneous at some point in time. In another embodiment, the maximum temperature and the maximum pressure applied in manufacturing step 3 do not coincide over time. In some embodiments, the molded material obtained in step 3 is subjected to a process in which the organic portion is removed at least partially. In some embodiments, the organic portion is completely removed. In one embodiment, a debinding agent is used to remove the organic portion at least partially. In one embodiment, the debinding agent is a thermal debinding agent. In some embodiments, the organic portion is removed at least partially using a thermal process. In different embodiments, the debinding agent is a non-thermal process selected from non-thermal debinding agents, chemical debinding agents, catalysts, wicking, drying, supercritical extraction, organic solvent extraction, aqueous solvent extraction or freeze-drying, and others. In different embodiments, at least the organic portion is removed using a thermal process at temperatures above 0.3*Tm, above 0.45*Tm, above 0.55*Tm, and further above 0.7*Tm, where Tm refers to the melting temperature of the relevant element or phase having the lowest melting temperature in the non-organic portion of the material. The inspection conditions are disclosed in the last part of this document. In one embodiment, the consolidation step comprises sintering. In one embodiment, the consolidation step comprises hot isotropic pressing (HIP). In one embodiment, the consolidation step comprises some form of plastic deformation. In one embodiment, steps 4 and 5 are performed simultaneously. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of performing several additional forming steps involving removal of material at a certain location (e.g., trimming, drilling, machining, polishing, etc.). In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of performing several additional forming steps involving material stacking (thermal spraying or cold spraying, metal coating, building welding or direct energy deposition (AM) or other). In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of heat treating the formed material. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of locally heat treating the formed material. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of applying a surface heat treatment at least locally to the formed material. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of applying a coating at least locally to the formed material. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of applying paint at least locally to the formed material. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a step of joining the formed material to another element, structure, component, part or any other. In one embodiment, the method further comprises any other method steps described herein. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a washing or rinsing step. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shot peening, blasting or similar step. With respect to the weight of the organic portion in the material, considering the weight-based proportion of the organic portion in the resulting molded material, in one embodiment, at least 35% of the organic portion by weight should remain. In different embodiments, less than 49%, less than 34%, less than 24%, less than 14%, less than 9%, less than 4%, less than 2%, and less than 0.4% of the organic portion by weight should remain, and furthermore, no remaining organic portion may be found. In alternative embodiments, the proportions disclosed above are by volume, referring to the volume of the organic portion in the resulting molded material with respect to the volume of the organic portion in the material. In some other embodiments after compaction, with respect to the volume of organic parts in the material, considering the volume of organic parts in the resulting molded material, in one embodiment, at least 35% of the volume of organic parts should remain. In different embodiments, less than 49%, less than 34%, less than 24%, less than 14%, less than 9%, less than 4%, less than 2%, and less than 0.4% of the volume of organic parts should remain, and furthermore, no organic parts remain. In alternative embodiments, the percentages disclosed above are by weight, and refer to the weight of organic parts in the resulting molded material with respect to the weight of organic parts in the material. In some cases, the density of the molded material obtained by this method exceeds 96%, 98%, and even 99% of the theoretical density in different embodiments. The density of the obtained element is measured by Archimedes' principle in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials B962-08. All embodiments of this method are combinable, provided they are not mutually exclusive. Any embodiment disclosed herein can be combined with this method in any combination provided, and they are not mutually exclusive. Methods 1 to 7 disclosed below are some examples of combinations of embodiments of the methods described in the last paragraph. Thus, any embodiment for any disclosed method step can be combined with any method 1 to 7 in any combination provided and are not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, any other embodiments disclosed herein can be combined with any method 1 to 7 in any combination provided and are not mutually exclusive. Method 1 The method consists of the following steps. Step 1: Take the ingredients Step 2: Shape the material using molding technology. Step 3: The molded material obtained in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. Step 4: The molded material obtained in Step 3 undergoes a debindering process, in which at least a portion of the organic parts are removed. Step 5: The molded material obtained in Step 4 undergoes a compaction process. Therefore, the resulting molded material has a remaining organic portion that accounts for less than 49% by weight of the organic portion in the material. Furthermore, the resulting molded material has a density exceeding 96% of the theoretical density. Method 2 The method consists of the following steps. Step 1: Take a material comprising an organic part and a non-organic part, wherein the organic part comprises relevant elements whose deflection temperature, measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi], is at least 22°C higher than the 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic part of the material, and the non-organic part comprises metallic phases having at least 30% by weight of %Ga or %Li with respect to the weight of such metallic phases, and if all metallic phases (including intermetallic compounds) are considered, %Li and %Ga are less than 18% by weight with respect to the total weight of the metallic phases. Step 2: Shape the material using polymer molding technology. and optionally Step 3: The molded material obtained in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 0.6 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.46*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. Step 4: The molded material obtained in Step 2 or 3 undergoes a compaction process. Therefore, the resulting molded material has a remaining organic portion that accounts for less than 49% by weight with respect to the weight of the organic portion in the material. Method 3 The method consists of the following steps. Step 1: Take a material comprising an organic part and a non-organic part, wherein the organic part comprises a relevant element whose deflection temperature, measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 under a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi], is at least 22°C higher than the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic part of the material, or 0.45*Tm of that element, and the non-organic part comprises a metallic phase having at least 56% %Li by weight with respect to such metallic phase, and %Li is less than 18% by weight with respect to the total weight of the metallic phase when all present metallic phases (including intermetallic compounds) are added together. Step 2: The material is formed by an additive manufacturing process based on polymerization or curing by exposure to radiation at wavelengths of 460 nm or higher. Step 3: The molded material obtained in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. Step 4: The molded material obtained in Step 3 undergoes a debindering process, in which at least a portion of the organic parts are removed. Step 5: The molded material obtained in Step 4 undergoes a compaction process. Therefore, the resulting molded material has a remaining organic portion that accounts for less than 49% by weight of the organic portion in the material. Furthermore, the resulting molded material has a density exceeding 96% of the theoretical density. Method 4 The method consists of the following steps. Step 1: Take a material comprising an organic portion and a non-organic portion, wherein the organic portion comprises relevant elements whose deflection temperature, measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 under a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi], is at least 22°C higher than the 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic portion of the material, and the non-organic portion comprises one of the materials described in PCT / EP2016 / 076895. Step 2: The material is formed by an additive manufacturing process based on polymerization or curing by exposure to radiation at wavelengths of 460 nm or higher. Step 3: The molded material produced in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. Step 4: The molded material obtained in Step 3 undergoes a debindering process, in which at least a portion of the organic parts are removed. Step 5: The molded material obtained in Step 4 undergoes a compaction process. Therefore, the resulting molded material has a remaining organic portion that accounts for less than 49% by weight with respect to the weight of the organic portion in the material. Method 5 The method consists of the following steps. Step 1: Take the materials disclosed in this document. Step 2: Molding the material using additive manufacturing, PIM (particle injection molding), or a similar process. Step 3: The material formed in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. The inspection conditions for thermal deflection temperature are disclosed in the final section of this document. In one embodiment of Methods 1 to 5, the weight ratio of the remaining organic portion in the resulting molded material is considered in relation to the weight of the organic portion in the material. In a different embodiment, at least 35%, at least 45%, at least 56%, at least 66%, at least 76%, and at least 82% of the organic portion by weight should be left. In some embodiments, even slight degradation of the organic portion should be prevented. In a different embodiment, at least 86% of the organic portion by weight should be left, and at least 92%, at least 96%, at least 97%, and even more than 99% of the organic portion should be left. In some other embodiments after compaction in Methods 1 to 5, the volume of organic parts in the material is considered in relation to the volume of organic parts in the resulting molded material. In different embodiments, at least 35%, at least 45%, at least 56%, at least 66%, at least 76%, and even more than 82% of the organic parts by volume should be left. In some embodiments, even slight degradation of the organic parts should be prevented. In different embodiments, at least 86%, at least 92%, at least 96%, at least 97%, and even more than 99% of the organic parts by volume should be left. The density of the molded material obtained by this method exceeds 96%, 98%, and even 99% of the theoretical density in different embodiments, and the density of the resulting elements is measured by Archimedes' principle in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials B962-08. In alternative embodiments of Methods 2 to 5, the thermal deflection temperature of the relevant element in the organic part of the material can be replaced in different embodiments by either the glass transition temperature, or the degradation temperature, or the melting temperature of such relevant element in the organic phase, and the same relationship should be satisfied with respect to the melting temperature of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant element / phase in the non-organic part of the material. The inspection conditions are disclosed in the last part of this document. In Method 2, in a different embodiment, the organic portion has relevant elements whose deflection temperature, measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi], is at least 22°C above 0.52 times the melting temperature of the relevant element / phase having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic portion of the material (at least 22°C above 0.52*Tm), at least 22°C above 0.76*Tm, and further at least 22°C above 0.82*Tm. If Step 3 is optional, the pressure applied in Step 3 is, in a different embodiment, 1.1 MPa or greater, 2.1 MPa or greater, 11 MPa or greater, and / or 26 MPa or greater. In this method, after step 2, the elements are formed, or in embodiments where step 3 is also applied, after step 3, the melting temperature of the non-organic portion in the formed material is at least 20%, at least 34%, at least 48%, at least 61%, and further at least 66% higher than the melting temperature of this metallic phase of the material in different embodiments. In different embodiments, the molding technique used in step 2 is polymer molding technique, metal injection molding (MIM), particle injection molding (PIM), injection molding, compression molding, thermoforming, or any other similar technique. In one embodiment, the metallic phase contains 56% %Li by weight with respect to the weight of such metallic phase. The inventors have found that in some embodiments, the correct selection of particle size is very important. In different embodiments, particles having a D50 of less than 50 micrometers, less than 20 micrometers, and further less than 20 micrometers are desirable. Moreover, in alternative embodiments, any other particle sizes disclosed herein can be combined in this method, provided they are not incompatible.In some embodiments, when this method 2 is performed, the inventors have surprisingly found that, if step 3 or step 4 is applied, after step 2 or after step 3 or step 4, the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the molded material (the obtained molded material) rises compared to the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the material (the non-organic portion of the material taken in step 1 before molding), and the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the obtained molded material is 1.2 times, 1.4 times, 1.8 times, and even 2.1 times higher than the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the material in different embodiments. In some embodiments, when this method 2 is performed, the inventors have surprisingly found that, if step 3 or step 4 is applied, after step 2 or after step 3 or step 4, the melting temperature of the metal portion of the formed material (the metal portion of the material taken in step 1 before forming) rises compared to the melting temperature of the metal portion of the material (the metal portion of the material taken in step 1 before forming), and the melting temperature of the metal portion of the formed material is 1.2 times, 1.4 times, 1.8 times, and even 2.1 times higher than the melting temperature of the metal portion of the material in different embodiments. In methods 3 and 4, materials that cure at wavelengths of 460 nm or higher refer to materials that react well to such wavelengths. All embodiments of this method are combinable, provided they are not mutually exclusive. Some other examples of combinations of method embodiments can be found in the following paragraphs. Method 6 The method comprises the following steps. Step 1: Take a material comprising an organic portion and a non-organic portion, wherein the organic portion has a corresponding element having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 120°C, and the non-organic portion comprises a metallic phase having a Tm lower than 495°C. Step 2: Shape the material using molding technology. Step 3: The molded material produced in Step 2 is subjected to a process that simultaneously involves a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. Method 7 The method comprises the following steps. Step 1: Take a material comprising an organic portion and a non-organic portion, wherein the organic portion has a relevant element having a deflection temperature measured according to American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 120°C, and the non-organic portion comprises a metallic phase as described in PCT / EP2016 / 076895. Step 2: Shape the material using molding technology. Step 3: The molded material obtained in Step 2 is subjected to a process that simultaneously involves a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. Method 8 The method consists of the following steps. Step 1: Take a material comprising an organic part and a non-organic part, wherein the organic part has a relevant element having a deflection temperature measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi] at at least 120°C, and the non-organic part comprises a metallic phase having at least 16% %Li by weight with respect to the weight of such metallic phase. Step 2: Shape the material using molding technology. Step 3: The molded material obtained in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. Method 9 The method comprises the following steps. Step 1: Take a material comprising an organic part and a non-organic part, wherein the organic part comprises relevant elements whose deflection temperature, measured according to the American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi], is at least 22°C higher than the 0.45*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic part of the material, and the non-organic part comprises a metallic phase having at least 30% by weight of %Ga or %Li with respect to the weight of such metallic phase, and if all metallic phases (including intermetallic compounds) present in the non-organic part are taken into consideration, %Li and %Ga are less than 18% by weight with respect to the total weight of the metallic phase. Step 2: Shape the material using polymer molding technology. and optionally Step 3: The molded material obtained in Step 2 is subjected to a process involving a pressure exceeding 0.6 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.46*Tm of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases of the non-organic portion of the material. The inspection conditions for thermal deflection temperature are disclosed in the final section of this document. In methods 6, 7, 8, and 9, the weight-based percentage of the remaining organic portion in the molded material is considered with respect to the weight of the organic portion in the material. In different embodiments, at least 35%, at least 45%, at least 56%, at least 66%, at least 76%, and even at least 82% of the organic portion by weight should be left. In some embodiments, even a slight degradation of the organic portion should be prevented. In different embodiments, at least 86%, at least 92%, at least 96%, at least 97%, and even at least 99% of the organic portion by weight should be left. In alternative embodiments, the percentages disclosed above are by volume and refer to the volume of the organic portion in the resulting molded material with respect to the volume of the organic portion in the material. In some other embodiments of Methods 6, 7, 8, and 9, after compaction, the volume of the organic portion in the resulting molded material is taken into consideration with respect to the volume of the material. In different embodiments, at least 35%, at least 45%, at least 56%, at least 66%, at least 76%, and even more than 82% of the organic portion by volume should be left. In some embodiments, even slight degradation of the organic portion should be prevented. In different embodiments, at least 86%, at least 92%, at least 96%, at least 97%, and even more than 99% of the organic portion by volume should be left. In alternative embodiments, the percentages disclosed above are by weight and refer to the weight of the organic portion in the resulting molded material with respect to the weight of the organic portion in the material. In alternative embodiments of methods 6 to 8, the thermal deflection temperature of the relevant element of the material can be replaced in different embodiments by either the glass transition temperature, or the degradation temperature, or the melting temperature of such relevant element of the organic phase. In Method 9, in a different embodiment, the organic portion has relevant elements whose deflection temperature, measured according to American Society for Testing and Materials D648-07 at a load of 0.46 MPa [66 psi], is at least 22°C above 0.52 times the melting temperature of the relevant element / phase having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic portion of the material (at least 22°C above 0.52*Tm), at least 22°C above 0.76*Tm, and further at least 22°C above 0.82*Tm. If Step 3 is optional, the pressure applied in Step 3 is at least 1.1 MPa, at least 2.1 MPa, at least 11 MPa and / or at least 26 MPa in a different embodiment. In this method, after step 2, the elements are formed, or in embodiments in which step 3 is also applied, after step 3, the melting temperature of the non-organic portion in the formed material is at least 20%, at least 34%, at least 48%, at least 61%, and further at least 66% higher than the melting temperature of this metallic phase of the material in different embodiments. In different embodiments, the molding technique used in step 2 is polymer molding, metal injection molding (MIM), particle injection molding (PIM), injection molding, compression molding, thermoforming, or any other similar technique. In one embodiment, the metallic phase contains 56% %Li by weight with respect to the weight of such metallic phase. The inventors have found that in some embodiments, the correct selection of particle size is very important. In different embodiments, particles having a D50 of less than 50 micrometers, less than 20 micrometers, and even less than 20 micrometers are desirable. Moreover, in alternative embodiments, any other particle sizes disclosed herein can be combined in this method, provided they are not incompatible. In some embodiments, when performing this method 9, the inventors have surprisingly found that, if step 3 is applied, after step 2 or after step 3, the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the molded material (the obtained molded material) rises compared to the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the material (the non-organic portion of the material taken in step 1 before molding), and the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the obtained molded material is 1.2 times, 1.4 times, 1.8 times, and even 2.1 times higher than the melting temperature of the non-organic portion of the material in different embodiments. In some embodiments, when performing this method 9, the inventors have surprisingly found that, if step 3 is applied, after step 2 or after step 3, the melting temperature of the metal portion of the molded material (the obtained molded material) rises compared to the melting temperature of the metal portion of the material (the metal portion of the material taken in step 1 before molding), and the melting temperature of the metal portion of the obtained molded material is 1.2 times, 1.4 times, 1.8 times, and even 2.1 times higher than the melting temperature of the metal portion of the material in different embodiments. In alternative embodiments of method 9, the thermal deflection temperature of the relevant element of the material can be replaced in different embodiments by either the glass transition temperature, or the degradation temperature, or the melting temperature of such relevant element of the organic phase, and the same relationship should be satisfied with respect to the melting temperature of the phase or element having the lowest melting temperature among the relevant elements / phases in the non-organic portion of the material. Some types of lattice structures achieve good mechanical strength, deformability, compliance, or any other relevant functional mechanical properties in particularly normalized terms (properties divided by the density of the lattice). Metallic lattices achieve these highly normalized mechanical property values, partly because the arrangement of the metals is highly optimized, resulting in a very high air content in the overall volume occupied by the material. Since air has a very low density, it strongly reduces the overall density. The authors found that most organic materials used have a density much higher than that of air, but the inventors found that functionality can be greatly improved, and despite the increase in weight, the solution is surprisingly advantageous. In one embodiment, this is applied to the structure of elements using a lattice made of a material comprising organic parts and non-organic parts comprising at least one metal or one metal alloy. In one embodiment, the lattice is a so-called superlattice. In one embodiment, the lattice is a three-dimensional repeat of the unit cell found in nature. In one embodiment, the lattice is any structure that can be increased by repeating the basic unit cell. In one embodiment, the lattice is a structure that can be increased to more than 85% by repeating a basic unit cell. In one embodiment, the lattice is any structure that achieves superior normalized mechanical properties compared to bulkier materials having the same alloying and microstructure (normalized mechanical properties mean mechanical properties divided by the density of the structure, where volume is not considered as voids within the material). In some embodiments, the material comprises an organic portion and a non-organic portion comprising a metallic alloy compacted in a manner that involves at least partial exposure to a certain temperature, but it is unique that at least the relevant fraction of the organic portion does not deteriorate significantly (the meanings of temperature, relevant fraction, and significant deterioration can be found elsewhere in this document in the same terms or equivalent expressions). In many applications, it is beneficial in this embodiment that the material can be in at least two states. One state is one that is easily molded by additive manufacturing (AM) or conventional polymer material molding methods. In one second state, the material exhibits high mechanical properties in some embodiments and high resistance to high temperatures and other factors in some embodiments. In the group of embodiments, one difference between the two states is the degree of aggregation or compaction of the non-organic phase. In one embodiment, at least some of the non-organic phase are individual particles in the original state, and at least some of these particles are aggregated or compacted in the later state. In one embodiment, particle aggregation / compactment involves the diffusion of atoms from one particle to another particle, and in one embodiment, involves diffusion bonding. In one embodiment, involves the formation of a particle network by diffusion. In one embodiment, particle aggregation / compactment is so strong that when the organic portion is removed and the aggregated / compacted particles are measured, in different embodiments, the equivalent average diameter is at least 12 times larger, at least 110 times larger, at least 1100 times larger, and even more than 110,000 times larger than the D50 of the original particles. In one alternative embodiment, D50 can be replaced with D50m. In the group of embodiments, one difference between the two states is the glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least one organic phase. In different embodiments, at least one of the organic elements is selected from a group of organic elements whose glass transition temperature (Tg) can be raised by 55°C, 105°C, 155°C, and 205°C or more when subjected to a transformation treatment (such as heat treatment, exposure to radiation, or chemical treatment). In one embodiment, the increase in glass transition temperature refers to the difference between the glass transition temperature of the organic element in the initial state and the glass transition temperature of the same organic material after being subjected to a transformation treatment, such as any method and / or molding technique disclosed herein or any other treatment applicable to the organic element, such as the application of pressure and / or temperature. The test conditions for identifying the glass transition temperature can be found in the last part of this document. For the group of embodiments, having rod-shaped materials (filaments, wound wires, or other filaments) is beneficial, and filament-based additive manufacturing (AM) processes can benefit from such types. This can be adapted to very large robotic structures for forming extremely large elements. In different embodiments, the filament has a non-organic phase with a length-to-equivalent diameter ratio greater than 6, greater than 11, greater than 16, greater than 26, greater than 106, and even greater than 1060. In one embodiment, the filament or rod-shaped material is stretched by mechanical action to facilitate the alignment of the non-organic phase with a high length-to-equivalent diameter ratio. In one embodiment, the filament or rod-shaped material is stretched by mechanical action to facilitate the elongation of the non-organic phase with a high length-to-equivalent diameter ratio. In one embodiment, the mechanically stretched filament or rod-shaped material comprises carbon nanotubes with a high length-to-equivalent diameter ratio. In one embodiment, the filament or rod-shaped material comprises fibers other than those already described (and therefore by reasonable definition) in this document. The materials described in this embodiment are highly beneficial for the production of elements via conventional manufacturing routes, especially when the majority of the organic portion is retained and the non-organic particles have a high ratio of length to equivalent diameter, and especially when the material comprises non-organic portions that are present from the beginning as particles but undergo an aggregation / consolidation process. In one embodiment, the material is formed by particle injection molding (PIM) (metal injection molding (MIM) or ceramic injection molding (CIM)), and in one embodiment, by known polymer material molding techniques. In one embodiment, the organic portion is largely retained in the manner defined above. One embodiment refers to a method by which a material previously disclosed in this document is formed by additive manufacturing (defined in this document as a technique that applies the principle of additive manufacturing, and thus assembles a physical three-dimensional shape by the continuous addition of material according to American Society for Testing and Materials 52900-15), and specifically the method disclosed below is applied to a material that can harden when exposed to radiation, and the molding technique comprises exposing at least a portion of the material to such radiation. The method for shaping the material comprises the following steps. Step 1: Provide a material that "hardens" when exposed to "appropriate radiation". Step 2: Molding the material provided in Step 1 using an additive manufacturing method that involves exposing at least a portion of the material to "appropriate radiation". Step 3: Separate the hardened or partially hardened material from the unhardened material. In one embodiment, “appropriate radiation” refers to the appropriate radiation for producing such hardening, and the values ​​of such radiation in different embodiments are disclosed later in this document. Any embodiment relating to materials previously disclosed herein can be combined with any embodiment of this method, provided they are not incompatible. In one embodiment, the “curing” material is a curable material. In one embodiment, the “curing” material is a resin. In one embodiment, the resin is polymerizable by exposure to interesting radiation (often called a photopolymerizable resin). In one embodiment, the “curing” material is a polymeric liquid comprising monomers or mixtures of monomers and a photoinitiator readily reactive to “appropriate radiation”. In one embodiment, the “curing” material is a polymeric liquid comprising monomers or mixtures of monomers and a dye readily reactive to “appropriate radiation”. In different embodiments, the “curing” material further comprises a reaction accelerator, a photochromic compound that can be sensitized when exposed to “appropriate radiation” (some examples include azobenzene, spiropyran, stilbene, fulgites, diarylethenes), a chromophore that can generate heat when exposed to “appropriate radiation”, and a thermal initiator. In one embodiment, the “curing” material further comprises elements that affect the viscosity of the mixture. In one embodiment, the “curing” material further comprises a small amount of elements that reduce the viscosity of the mixture. In one embodiment, the reduced viscosity is mechanical viscosity. In one embodiment, the reduced viscosity is cinematic viscosity. In one embodiment, the reduced viscosity is absolute viscosity. In a different embodiment, small amounts of the viscosity-reducing element are 19% or less, 14% or less, 9% or less, 4% or less, 1.8% or less, 0.9% or less, and further 0.4% or less by volume with respect to the volume of the organic part of the material. In an alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above refer to the volume of the material. In an alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by weight. Whether it is one element or more that reduces the viscosity, it must be indicated as small amounts. In a different embodiment, these are 0.1% or more, 0.6% or more, 1.1% or more, 2.1% or more, and further 5% or more by volume with respect to the volume of the organic part of the material. In an alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are with respect to the volume of the material. In an alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by weight.Reducing the viscosity of a mixture means that the mixture of all elements except those assigned to viscosity reduction (and these elements are thought to have numerous functionalities in addition to reducing the viscosity of the mixture, such as particulate load dispersion and coloration) has a higher viscosity than the same mixture when the viscosity-reducing elements are added. In different embodiments, the viscosity is reduced by at least 2%, at least 6%, at least 11%, at least 16%, at least 22%, at least 42%, at least 52%, and further at least 72%. Viscosity is measured according to ISO 3219:1993 (at room temperature of 23°C and 1 atm). In one embodiment, the “curing” material is a resin. In another embodiment, it is a polymerizable resin upon exposure to “appropriate radiation” of interest. In a different embodiment, conversions of 12% or more, 16% or more, 22% or more, 36% or more, 42% or more, 52% or more, 62% or more, and 82% or more are achieved in the “curing” material with sufficient addition, and the conversions are measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of differences. In a different embodiment, the above values ​​of conversions are measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) selectively, with proper adjustment according to the monomer and / or oligomer used, according to the method disclosed in DOI:10.1007 / s10853-005-5689-y, or further, with proper adjustment using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, according to DOI:10.1007 / s10965-011-9811-3, with proper adjustment according to the monomer and / or oligomer used, with proper adjustment according to the method disclosed in DOI:10.1007 / s10853-005-5689-y, or further, with proper adjustment using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. In a different embodiment, sufficient addition is 0.26 J / cm³ 2 More than 0.42J / cm 2 More than 0.94J / cm 2 Above, 1.72J / cm 2 Above, 3.6J / cm 2 Above, 5.2J / cm 2 Above, 16J / cm 2 Above, 26J / cm 2 The above, and furthermore 56 J / cm 2 That's all. In this embodiment and the following related embodiments, “suitable radiation” means radiation having wavelengths within a defined range, whether repeated or not in this paragraph. For some embodiments, a similarly specified power density may also be included. The range that defines “suitable radiation” depends on the selected application or embodiment. For some embodiments, a sufficient range of high and low frequencies is very important. In different embodiments, “suitable radiation” has frequencies of 120 THz or less, 89 THz or less, 69 THz or less, 49 THz or less, 19 THz or less, 9 THz or less, 2.1 THz or less, and further 0.8 THz or less. In some embodiments, the frequency of “suitable radiation” should not be too low. In different embodiments, “suitable radiation” has frequencies of 0.2 THz or higher, 1.1 THz or higher, 11 THz or higher, 21 THz or higher, 56 THz or higher, and further 102 THz or higher. The use of this precise radiation (upper and lower limits) allows for unexpectedly fast curing, even in opaque suspensions. In one set of embodiments, “appropriate radiation” is non-ionizing radiation. This simplifies the construction of the setting considerably if the potential harmfulness of the radiation is very low. In one embodiment, “appropriate radiation” is coherent radiation, which in one embodiment remains coherent after penetration into the material, and in one embodiment remains coherent after 0.1 mm penetration into the material (usually the brightest point of the penetration distance is used as a reference, and the remaining coherence is often interpreted as a related phase, with a difference of at least 20% of the ratio value between the phases being maintained). In one embodiment, “appropriate radiation” is free-propagating radiation, which in one embodiment consists of one or more discrete wavelengths, in one embodiment consists of one discrete wavelength, and in one embodiment consists of more than 1 but less than 9 discrete wavelengths. The inventors have found that this embodiment is also very beneficial for materials such as any materials previously disclosed in this document, particularly for materials containing a high volume of particles within the material, and that for some applications, the arrangement of particles within the material has a very adverse effect on the proper operation of the molding process. In different embodiments, the material comprises particles at a rate of 6% or more, 31% or more, 41% or more, 52% or more, 61% or more, 71% or more, and even 81% or more, relative to the volume of the material. In one alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by weight. In some applications, the volume content of particles should be controlled so that the desired transformation can be achieved, and in different embodiments, the volume of particles is 89% or less, 84% or less, 79% or less, 69% or less, 59% or less, and even 39% or less, relative to the volume of the material. In one alternative embodiment, the percentages disclosed above are by weight. In some embodiments, these particles refer to the non-organic portion of the material. In some embodiments, the relevant size of the cavities between particles is important. In different embodiments, the relevant sizes of interparticle cavities are 980 micrometers or less, 480 micrometers ...

Claims

1. A method for shaping a material, (1) A step of obtaining a material, wherein the material comprises an organic portion having at least one component or phase, and an inorganic portion having at least one component or phase, (2) A step of molding the material using molding technology, (3) A step of subjecting the material formed in step (2) to a process including a pressure exceeding 55 MPa and a temperature exceeding 0.45 × Tm, wherein Tm (°C) is the melting point of the phase or component having the lowest melting point among the components or phases in the inorganic portion of the material, and the component or phase in the inorganic portion is at least 1.2% by volume relative to the volume of the inorganic portion. It has, Furthermore, if necessary, (4) A step of subjecting the molded material obtained in step (3) to a binder removal process, and / or (5) A step of subjecting the molded material obtained in step (3) or (4) to a solidification process, A method having

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the molding technique is selected from polymer molding techniques, injection molding, compression molding, thermoforming, or additive manufacturing.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the material taken in step (1) comprises an element in an amount of at least 1.2% of the weight of the material, and the element has a melting point of less than 580°C.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the material obtained in step (1) comprises an organic portion comprising at least one component and an inorganic portion comprising at least one component.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the deflection temperature (°C) of the organic component, as measured according to the ASTMD648-07 test at a load of 0.46 MPa (66 psi), is more than 0.45 times higher than the melting point of the inorganic component of the material, and the component or phase in the inorganic portion is at least 0.06% by volume relative to the volume of the inorganic portion.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the inorganic portion of the material is at least 52% by weight relative to the weight of the material.

7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein, after applying the method, the volume of the organic portion remaining in the material is less than 24%.

8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the density of the molded material obtained exceeds 96% of the theoretical density.

Images