System for providing land compensation platform service using expert group

Abstract

A system for providing land compensation platform services using an expert group is provided, comprising: at least one expert terminal participating in at least one stage among the pre-, mid-, and post-stages of land compensation; a user terminal receiving analysis data regarding land compensation and receiving an optimal solution among the analysis data; a pool building unit storing at least one expert terminal by mapping it to at least one stage and at least one field; a receiving unit receiving land compensation target data from the user terminal; a transmitting unit transmitting the received target data to at least one expert terminal; a collecting unit collecting analysis data received from at least one expert terminal; and a price comparison unit receiving an optimal solution among the analysis data from at least one expert terminal and providing the optimal solution to the user terminal.

Description

Technology Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a land compensation platform service provision system using a group of experts, and provides a system that collects analysis data from experts according to each stage of land compensation before, during, and after, and then provides an optimal solution. Background Technology

[0002] Land compensation for land acquired through negotiation or adjudication shall be based on the officially assessed land price pursuant to the Act on the Public Announcement of Real Estate Prices, provided that compensation is made at an appropriate price assessed by considering the land use plan pursuant to relevant laws from the date of public announcement to the time of valuation, the rate of fluctuation in land prices prescribed by Presidential Decree for areas not affected by the relevant public project, the producer price index increase rate, and other factors such as the location, shape, environment, and usage status of the land (Article 70, Paragraph 1 of the Land Compensation Act). The amount of compensation for land shall be calculated by considering the actual usage status at the time of valuation and objective circumstances based on general usage methods, but shall not consider temporary usage status, subjective values ​​held by the landowner or related parties, or cases premised on use for a special purpose (Article 30, Paragraph 2 of the same Act). In the case of acquisition by negotiation prior to the recognition of the project, the officially assessed land price pursuant to Paragraph 1 shall be the officially assessed land price published at the time closest to the time of valuation among the officially assessed land prices published at the time of valuation of the relevant land (Article 70, Paragraph 3 of the same Act).

[0003] At this time, a method for implementing land compensation was researched and developed. In this regard, prior art Korean Patent Publication No. 2022-0073188 (published June 3, 2022) and Korean Patent Publication No. 2010-0006056 (published January 18, 2010) each disclose a configuration for collecting publicly announced prices to calculate land compensation prices, analyzing the appropriateness of the publicly announced prices compared to housing prices, standard market prices, and actual transaction prices, and then calculating the land compensation price; and a configuration for generating and providing comprehensive land information by linking project plan information, including project area line information, thematic map information, project plan information, actual condition survey information, compensation cost calculation information, compensation cost payment information, expropriation adjudication information, objection adjudication management information, repurchase information, completion information, site management information, and statistical information, with the geometric information and attribute information of the land.

[0004] However, while the former falls within the realm of appraisal for calculating land compensation values, and the latter involves only the configuration for generating maps to execute project plans after land expropriation by the Korea Water Resources Corporation, a configuration that manages the entire process—before, during, and after land expropriation—through a total platform has not been disclosed. Since land compensation involves various specialized firms such as the Land Compensation Committee, judicial scrivener, tax accountant, lawyer, securities firm, REIT, trust company, appraiser, replacement land company, and Special Purpose Company (SPC) handling specific fields and stages, it is difficult to provide the optimal compensation plan to landowners when conflicts of interest exist. Furthermore, because tasks are fragmented across stages, it is structurally difficult to provide an optimal solution unless all steps are handled in a one-stop manner. Therefore, research and development of a platform capable of collecting data from at least one expert terminal for land compensation and providing optimal solutions across all stages—before, during, and after—is required. The problem to be solved

[0005] One embodiment of the present invention provides a land compensation platform service provision system utilizing an expert group, which provides a land compensation platform, offers open expert terminals according to the pre-, mid-, and post-stages of land compensation, and selects an optimal solution from analysis data collected from each expert terminal and presents it to the landowner, thereby shifting the special sacrifice incurred by individuals in property to meet public demand onto the entire nation, thereby distributing the public burden evenly among all citizens and minimizing the infringement of property rights, which are fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. However, the technical problem that this embodiment aims to solve is not limited to the technical problem described above, and other technical problems may exist. means of solving the problem

[0006] As a technical means for achieving the aforementioned technical task, one embodiment of the present invention comprises: at least one expert terminal participating in at least one stage among the pre-, mid-, and post-stages of land compensation; a user terminal receiving analysis data from at least one expert terminal regarding land compensation and receiving an optimal solution among the analysis data; a personnel pool building unit storing at least one expert terminal by mapping it to at least one stage and at least one field; a receiving unit receiving land compensation target data from the user terminal; a transmitting unit transmitting the received target data to at least one expert terminal; a collecting unit collecting analysis data received from at least one expert terminal; and a price comparison unit receiving an optimal solution among the analysis data of at least one expert terminal and providing the optimal solution to the user terminal. Effects of the invention

[0007] According to any one of the means for solving the problem of the present invention described above, a land compensation platform is provided, and expert terminals according to the pre-, mid-, and post-stages of land compensation are provided in an open manner. By selecting an optimal solution from the analysis data collected from each expert terminal and presenting it to the landowner, the special sacrifice in property incurred by individuals to meet public demand is transferred to the entire nation as a burden, thereby enabling the public burden to be evenly distributed among all citizens and minimizing the infringement of property rights, which are fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Brief explanation of the drawing

[0008] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a land compensation platform service provision system using an expert group according to one embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating a platform service provider server included in the system of Figure 1. FIGS. 3 and 4 are drawings for explaining an embodiment in which a land compensation platform service using an expert group according to an embodiment of the present invention is implemented. FIG. 5 is an operation flowchart illustrating a method for providing a land compensation platform service using an expert group according to an embodiment of the present invention. Specific details for implementing the invention

[0009] Embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the attached drawings so that those skilled in the art can easily implement the invention. However, the present invention may be embodied in various different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein. Furthermore, in order to clearly explain the present invention in the drawings, parts unrelated to the explanation have been omitted, and similar parts throughout the specification are denoted by similar reference numerals.

[0010] Throughout the specification, when a part is described as being "connected" to another part, this includes not only cases where they are "directly connected" but also cases where they are "electrically connected" with other elements interposed between them. Furthermore, when a part is described as "including" a component, this means that, unless specifically stated otherwise, it does not exclude other components but may include additional components, and it should be understood that this does not preclude the existence or addition of one or more other features, numbers, steps, actions, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

[0011] Terms such as “about,” “substantially,” etc., used throughout the specification, are used to mean at or near the stated value when inherent manufacturing and material tolerances are presented in the stated meaning, and are used to prevent unscrupulous infringers from unfairly exploiting the disclosure in which precise or absolute values ​​are mentioned to aid in understanding the invention. Terms such as “step” or “step of” used throughout the specification of the invention do not mean “step for”.

[0012] In this specification, the term "part" includes a unit realized by hardware, a unit realized by software, and a unit realized using both. Additionally, one unit may be realized using two or more pieces of hardware, and two or more units may be realized by one piece of hardware. Meanwhile, "part" is not limited to software or hardware, and "part" may be configured to reside in an addressable storage medium or configured to run on one or more processors. Accordingly, as an example, "part" includes components such as software components, object-oriented software components, class components, and task components, as well as processes, functions, attributes, procedures, subroutines, segments of program code, drivers, firmware, microcode, circuits, data, databases, data structures, tables, arrays, and variables. The functions provided within the components and "parts" may be combined into a smaller number of components and "parts" or further separated into additional components and "parts." In addition, the components and '~parts' may be implemented to play one or more CPUs within the device or secure multimedia card.

[0013] Some of the operations or functions described herein as being performed by a terminal, device, or device may instead be performed by a server connected to said terminal, device, or device. Likewise, some of the operations or functions described as being performed by a server may also be performed by a terminal, device, or device connected to said server.

[0014] In this specification, some of the operations or functions described as mapping or matching with a terminal may be interpreted as meaning mapping or matching the terminal's unique number or personal identification information, which is the terminal's identifying data.

[0015] The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the attached drawings.

[0016] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a land compensation platform service provision system using an expert group according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 1, the land compensation platform service provision system (1) using an expert group may include at least one user terminal (100), a platform service provision server (300), at least one expert terminal (400), and an administrator terminal (500). However, since the land compensation platform service provision system (1) using an expert group of FIG. 1 is merely an embodiment of the present invention, the present invention is not to be interpreted as being limited by FIG. 1.

[0017] At this time, each component of FIG. 1 is generally connected through a network (Network, 200). For example, as illustrated in FIG. 1, at least one user terminal (100) may be connected to a platform service provider server (300) through the network (200). The platform service provider server (300) may be connected to at least one user terminal (100), at least one expert terminal (400), and an administrator terminal (500) through the network (200). Additionally, at least one expert terminal (400) may be connected to the platform service provider server (300) through the network (200). The administrator terminal (500) may be connected to the user terminal (100), the expert terminal (400), and the platform service provider server (300) through the network (200).

[0018] Here, a network refers to a connection structure capable of exchanging information among individual nodes, such as multiple terminals and servers. Examples of such networks include Local Area Networks (LANs), Wide Area Networks (WANs), the World Wide Web (WWW), wired and wireless data networks, telephone networks, and wired and wireless television networks. Examples of wireless data communication networks include, but are not limited to, 3G, 4G, 5G, 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project), 5GPP (5th Generation Partnership Project), LTE (Long Term Evolution), WIMAX (World Interoperability for Microwave Access), Wi-Fi, Internet, LAN (Local Area Network), Wireless LAN (Wireless Local Area Network), WAN (Wide Area Network), PAN (Personal Area Network), RF (Radio Frequency), Bluetooth network, NFC (Near-Field Communication) network, satellite broadcasting network, analog broadcasting network, DMB (Digital Multimedia Broadcasting) network, etc.

[0019] In the following, the term "at least one" is defined as a term including both singular and plural forms, and it will be obvious that even if the term "at least one" does not exist, each component may exist in a singular or plural form and may mean singular or plural. Furthermore, whether each component is provided in a singular or plural form may be changed according to the embodiment.

[0020] At least one user terminal (100) may be a terminal of a user who receives analysis data and optimal solutions for land compensation by using a web page, app page, program, or application related to a land compensation platform service using an expert group.

[0021] Here, at least one user terminal (100) may be implemented as a computer capable of connecting to a remote server or terminal via a network. Here, the computer may include, for example, a laptop, desktop, or laptop equipped with a navigation system or a web browser. At this time, at least one user terminal (100) may be implemented as a terminal capable of connecting to a remote server or terminal via a network. At least one user terminal (100) may include all kinds of handheld-based wireless communication devices, such as navigation, PCS (Personal Communication System), GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications), PDC (Personal Digital Cellular), PHS (Personal Handyphone System), PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), IMT (International Mobile Telecommunication)-2000, CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access)-2000, W-CDMA (W-Code Division Multiple Access), Wibro (Wireless Broadband Internet) terminal, smartphone, smartpad, tablet PC, etc.

[0022] The platform service providing server (300) may be a server that provides a land compensation platform service web page, app page, program, or application using an expert group. Additionally, the platform service providing server (300) may be a server that builds a talent pool by receiving input such as the expert's area of ​​expertise and compensation stage from at least one expert terminal (400). Furthermore, the platform service providing server (300) may be a server that, when land compensation target data is uploaded from a user terminal (100), transmits it to at least one expert terminal (400) to request analysis data, collects the analysis data, compares the fees of each expert, extracts the optimal solution for each compensation stage from the analysis data, and provides it to the user terminal (100). At this time, the platform service providing server (300) may receive the optimal solution uploaded from the administrator terminal (500).

[0023] At least one expert terminal (400) may be a terminal of various specialized firms or experts, such as a land compensation countermeasures committee, a judicial scrivener, a tax accountant, a lawyer, a securities firm, a REITs firm, a trust company, an appraiser, a replacement land company, or a Special Purpose Company (SPC), that provide analysis data using a web page, app page, program, or application related to a land compensation platform service using an expert group. At this time, the types of specialized fields are not limited to those described above and are not excluded for reasons not listed. The expert terminal (400) may be a terminal of an expert who is registered in a talent pool by registering the compensation stage and specialized field that they can handle during the land compensation stage.

[0024] Here, at least one expert terminal (400) may be implemented as a computer capable of connecting to a remote server or terminal via a network. Here, the computer may include, for example, a navigation system, a laptop equipped with a web browser, a desktop, a laptop, etc. At this time, at least one expert terminal (400) may be implemented as a terminal capable of connecting to a remote server or terminal via a network. At least one professional terminal (400) may include all kinds of handheld-based wireless communication devices, such as navigation, PCS (Personal Communication System), GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications), PDC (Personal Digital Cellular), PHS (Personal Handyphone System), PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), IMT (International Mobile Telecommunication)-2000, CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access)-2000, W-CDMA (W-Code Division Multiple Access), Wibro (Wireless Broadband Internet) terminal, smartphone, smartpad, tablet PC, etc.

[0025] The administrator terminal (500) may be a terminal of an administrator that receives analysis data from an expert terminal (400) using a web page, app page, program, or application related to a land compensation platform service using an expert group, and selects and uploads an optimal solution among the analysis data so that it can be transmitted to a user terminal (100) via a platform service providing server (300).

[0026] Here, the administrator terminal (500) may be implemented as a computer capable of connecting to a remote server or terminal via a network. Here, the computer may include, for example, a laptop, desktop, or laptop equipped with a navigation system or a web browser. At this time, the administrator terminal (500) may be implemented as a terminal capable of connecting to a remote server or terminal via a network. The administrator terminal (500) may include all kinds of handheld-based wireless communication devices, such as navigation, PCS (Personal Communication System), GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications), PDC (Personal Digital Cellular), PHS (Personal Handyphone System), PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), IMT (International Mobile Telecommunication)-2000, CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access)-2000, W-CDMA (W-Code Division Multiple Access), Wibro (Wireless Broadband Internet) terminal, smartphone, smartpad, tablet PC, etc.

[0027] FIG. 2 is a block diagram for explaining a platform service providing server included in the system of FIG. 1, and FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 are drawings for explaining an embodiment in which a land compensation platform service using an expert group according to an embodiment of the present invention is implemented.

[0028] Referring to FIG. 2, the platform service providing server (300) may include a personnel pool building unit (310), a receiving unit (320), a transmission unit (330), a collection unit (340), a price comparison unit (350), a purchasing unit (360), a payment management unit (370), a fee comparison unit (380), and an upload unit (390).

[0029] When a platform service providing server (300) or another server (not shown) operating in conjunction with a platform service according to one embodiment of the present invention transmits a land compensation platform service application, program, app page, web page, etc., using an expert group to at least one user terminal (100), at least one expert terminal (400), and an administrator terminal (500), the at least one user terminal (100), at least one expert terminal (400), and the administrator terminal (500) may install or open the land compensation platform service application, program, app page, web page, etc., using an expert group. Additionally, a service program may be executed on at least one user terminal (100), at least one expert terminal (400), and an administrator terminal (500) by using a script executed in a web browser. Here, a web browser refers to a program that enables the use of World Wide Web (WWW) services and receives and displays hypertext described in HTML (Hyper Text Mark-up Language), and includes, for example, Netscape, Explorer, Chrome, etc. In addition, "application" refers to an application on a terminal, and includes, for example, an app running on a mobile terminal (smartphone).

[0030] Referring to FIG. 2, the basic concepts regarding the land compensation procedure will be explained below prior to explaining FIG. 2. The basic concepts explained below will not be explained redundantly through FIG. 2.

[0031] <Compensation for Losses under the Act on Acquisition and Compensation of Land, etc. for Public Projects>

[0032] The representative law regarding compensation for losses arising from public projects is the "Act on the Acquisition and Compensation of Land, etc. for Public Projects." While the provisions of this Act function as general laws regarding the principles, types, and standards of compensation for losses, they also function as special laws concerning compensation procedures and litigation; conversely, they play a pivotal role by acting as general authorities in relation to other related laws. The Act on the Acquisition and Compensation of Land, etc. for Public Projects was enacted to promote public welfare and ensure the proper protection of property rights by prescribing matters concerning compensation for losses resulting from the acquisition or use of land, etc., necessary for public projects through negotiation or expropriation. The scope of public projects for which land may be acquired or used pursuant to this Act includes projects for the public interest, such as national defense, military affairs, railways, airports, ports, public parking lots, wastewater treatment, schools, and libraries, as well as public facility projects, such as parks, cemeteries, crematoriums, and rental housing, implemented by the State or local governments.

[0033] Furthermore, a Central Land Expropriation Committee shall be established within the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and Local Land Expropriation Committees shall be established in cities and provinces to adjudicate matters concerning the areas and methods of use of land to be expropriated or used, compensation for losses, and the commencement date and period of expropriation or use. In addition, project implementers, landowners, etc., may file an objection to the adjudication, or they may file an administrative lawsuit directly without going through the objection process. Moreover, the project implementer must pay the full amount of compensation for losses incurred by landowners and related parties before commencing construction. When calculating the compensation amount, the appraisal of land, etc., shall be commissioned to at least two appraisal firms. Compensation shall be paid in cash as a principle. Furthermore, the project implementer shall establish relocation measures by providing residential buildings or provide relocation settlement funds. Tasks regarding compensation or relocation measures may be entrusted to local governments or public institutions. If land acquired or expropriated becomes unnecessary due to the abolition or alteration of the relevant public project, the landowner at the time of acquisition or their comprehensive successor may repurchase the land by returning an amount equivalent to the compensation already received to the project implementer.

[0034] Land Compensation

[0035] Land compensation for land acquired through negotiation or adjudication shall be based on the officially assessed land price pursuant to the Act on the Public Announcement of Real Estate Prices, provided that compensation is made at an appropriate price assessed by considering the land use plan pursuant to relevant laws from the date of such public announcement to the valuation date, the rate of change in land prices determined by Presidential Decree for areas not affected by the relevant public project, the producer price index increase rate, and other factors such as the location, shape, environment, and usage status of the land (Article 70, Paragraph 1 of the Land Compensation Act). The amount of compensation for land shall be calculated by considering the actual usage status at the valuation date and objective circumstances based on general usage methods, but shall not consider temporary usage status, subjective values ​​held by the landowner or related parties, or cases premised on use for a special purpose (Article 70, Paragraph 2 of the same Act). In the case of acquisition by consultation prior to project approval, the officially assessed land value pursuant to Paragraph 1 shall be the officially assessed land value published at the time closest to the valuation date among the officially assessed land values ​​published at the time of valuation of the relevant land (Article 70, Paragraph 3 of the Act). In the case of acquisition after project approval, the officially assessed land value pursuant to Paragraph 1 shall be the officially assessed land value with the date prior to the public notice of project approval as the basis for public announcement, and shall be the officially assessed land value published at the time closest to the public notice of project approval among the officially assessed land values ​​published at the time of the conclusion of consultation or adjudication regarding the relevant land (Article 70, Paragraph 4 of the Act). In addition, the rate of change in land prices in areas where there is no change in land prices due to the relevant public interest project, the producer price index increase rate, etc., should be taken into consideration. However, the exclusion of development profit shall not extend to that resulting from other projects unrelated to the relevant public interest project.

[0036] <Basic Procedures for Loss Compensation>

[0037] In public interest projects, compensation for losses is provided due to acquisition and use through consultation. This is explained with reference to Fig. 4, which describes the land compensation stage initiated by the Korea Water Resources Corporation.

[0038] <Preparation of Land Survey and Property Survey>

[0039] When it is necessary for the project implementer to acquire or use land, etc., through consultation prior to project approval under Article 20 of the Act for the execution of a public interest project, the project implementer shall prepare a land survey and a property survey, sign or seal them, and obtain the signatures or seals of landowners and interested parties. In this case, the project implementer shall record the reason in the said land survey and property survey.

[0040] <Notice and Viewing of Compensation Plan>

[0041] When a project implementer has prepared a land survey and a property survey, they shall publish a compensation plan in a daily newspaper distributed nationwide that includes an outline of the public project, the contents of the land and property surveys, and the timing, method, and procedures of compensation, and notify landowners, interested parties, and the relevant Special Self-Governing Provincial Governor, Mayor, County Governor, or District Head respectively (Article 15, Paragraph 1 and Article 26, Paragraph 1 of the Land Compensation Act). However, if the number of landowners and interested parties is 20 or fewer, the publication may be omitted (Article 15, Paragraph 1 of the same Act). Furthermore, in the case of a project implementer that is a non-governmental authority, or in cases where the project area spans two or more cities, counties, or districts, a copy thereof shall be sent to the relevant Special Self-Governing Provincial Governor, Mayor, County Governor, or District Head by notification, and a request for inspection shall be made (Article 15, Paragraph 1 and 2 of the same Act). A project implementer who has made a public announcement or notice in accordance with the above shall make the contents available for public inspection for at least 14 days. When the Central Land Expropriation Committee or the Local Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Land Expropriation Committee) pursuant to Article 49 of the Land Compensation Act receives an application for adjudication pursuant to Article 28, Paragraph 1, it shall make a public announcement without delay as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and make copies of the relevant documents available for public inspection for at least 14 days from the date of the public announcement (Article 31, Paragraph 1 of the same Act).

[0042] <Consultation>

[0043] According to Article 16 of the Land Compensation Act, the procedure of project recognition (Article 20) is established as an administrative measure for expropriation following acquisition by negotiation in principle; however, as stipulated in Article 26 of the same Act, negotiation is possible even after the project recognition procedure. Negotiation refers to an agreement reached between the expropriator and the expropriated party to acquire or extinguish rights regarding the object to be provided for a public project. In other words, during a public project, the project implementer acquires the land and other assets necessary for the project through negotiation or expropriation. By mandatorily placing the negotiation process—a voluntary procedure for the transfer of rights between landowners, related parties, and the project implementer—before the expropriation process involving the compulsory transfer of rights by the project implementer, the Land Compensation Act aims to facilitate the smooth operation of public projects through this negotiation process. Therefore, the purpose of negotiation is to minimize administrative issues arising from the acquisition of expropriated objects for public projects and to pursue the efficiency of administrative operations. In short, negotiation before project recognition is a voluntary procedure, whereas negotiation after project recognition is a mandatory procedure, which distinguishes them. While consultation prior to project approval is optional, it constitutes a private law contract as it reflects the consultation under the former Land Compensation Act in legislation; conversely, consultation after project approval can be considered a public law contract as it succeeds the consultation under the Land Expropriation Act. If an agreement is reached, the project implementer acquires the subject matter in accordance with the agreed terms. Furthermore, if an agreement is reached, the expropriation procedure is concluded, and the effect of the transfer of rights occurs. Accordingly, the project implementer must pay or deposit the compensation by the commencement date of expropriation (Article 40, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Act), and the landowner and interested parties must deliver or transfer the land or property to the project implementer by that date (Article 43 of the Act).

[0044] <Decision>

[0045] The matters subject to adjudication by the Land Expropriation Committee are: ① the area of ​​land to be expropriated or used and the method of use; ② compensation for losses; ③ the commencement date and period of expropriation or use; and ④ other matters prescribed by this Act and other laws. The Land Expropriation Committee shall make adjudication within the scope applied for by the project implementer, landowner, or interested party. However, in the case of compensation for losses, an adjudication increasing the amount may be made (Article 50, Paragraph 2 of the same Act). Furthermore, Article 85 of the Act stipulates: “① If a project implementer, a landowner, or a person interested in a matter has an objection to a decision made pursuant to Article 34, they may file an administrative lawsuit within 60 days from the date of receipt of the decision, or within 30 days from the date of receipt of the decision on the objection if an objection has been filed. In this case, the project implementer must deposit the increased compensation amount in accordance with Article 84 before filing the administrative lawsuit, and the person entitled to receive the compensation may not receive the deposited compensation amount until the lawsuit is concluded. ② If the administrative lawsuit to be filed pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 1 is a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of compensation, the person filing the lawsuit shall be the project implementer if the person filing the lawsuit is the landowner or a person interested in the matter, and the person filing the lawsuit shall be the landowner or a person interested in the matter.”

[0046] Accordingly, if one files an objection with the Central Land Expropriation Committee within 30 days of receiving the original copy of the decision from the Local Land Expropriation Committee and is dissatisfied with the decision, one may file an administrative lawsuit within 30 days of receiving the decision on the objection. Additionally, if one is dissatisfied with the decision, one may file an administrative lawsuit within 60 days of receiving the decision without going through the objection procedure. As such, according to the current Act on the Acquisition and Compensation of Land, etc. for Public Projects, if one is dissatisfied with the decision, one may file an administrative lawsuit without going through the decision on the objection. Furthermore, the current Land Compensation Act excludes the decision-making authority, which was a party to lawsuits regarding the increase or decrease of compensation under the former Land Expropriation Act, from being a party to the lawsuit, thereby ensuring adherence to the principle of adversarial action between the project implementer and the compensated party.

[0047] <Reconsideration Procedure>

[0048] The procedure for a decision on land expropriation compensation consists of the following steps: ① application for expropriation decision, ② public notice and inspection, ③ calculation of the expropriation decision, ④ deliberation, and ⑤ decision and delivery of the original copy of the decision. A unique aspect of this procedure is that only the project implementer may apply for a land expropriation decision. If a person other than the project implementer suffers relative disadvantage due to a delay in the expropriation decision, they may only apply for the decision; they cannot issue an expropriation decision to the competent Land Expropriation Committee, but can only apply for the decision to the project implementer. The time limit for such application is one year from the date of the public notice of project recognition, except in special cases. However, this does not apply if otherwise stipulated by individual laws. If a landowner or interested party requests an application for a decision from the project implementer, the project implementer must apply for a decision to the competent Land Expropriation Committee within 60 days from the date the request was received (Article 30, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Act).

[0049] When the competent Land Expropriation Committee receives an application for a decision, it shall publish a public notice without delay and allow the general public to inspect copies of the relevant documents for at least 14 days from the date of the public notice. It shall also send copies of the relevant documents to the Mayor, County Governor, or District Head (including the District Head of a non-autonomous district) having jurisdiction over the location of the land, etc., and request the public notice and inspection (Article 31 of the Act and Article 15, Paragraph 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act). Simultaneously with the public notice and inspection, the committee shall individually notify landowners and interested parties that they may submit written opinions regarding the contents of the public notice and ensure that such opinions are accepted within the inspection period (Article 15, Paragraph 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act). However, if it is recognized that there are substantial grounds, written opinions may be accepted even after the inspection period (Article 15, Paragraph 6 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act). After the inspection period, the Land Expropriation Committee shall conduct an investigation and hearing on the application for a decision on expropriation without delay (Article 32, Paragraph 1 of the Act). The Land Expropriation Committee may have the project implementer, landowner, and related parties appear and state their opinions only when deemed necessary during the hearing (Article 32, Paragraph 2 of the Act). Prior to the expropriation decision, the Land Expropriation Committee may recommend settlement to the parties (Article 33 of the Act). The decision must be rendered within 14 days from the date of the hearing; however, if there are special circumstances, it may be extended once within 14 days (Article 35 of the Act). The Land Expropriation Committee shall make the decision in writing and serve it on each party (Article 34 of the Act).

[0050] Objection

[0051] An objection under the Land Compensation Act is an administrative appeal procedure seeking the cancellation or modification of an illegal or unfair expropriation decision by the Land Expropriation Commission. In other words, an objection includes both cases of an administrative appeal nature filed with the Central Land Expropriation Commission, the immediate superior administrative agency regarding the expropriation decision of the Local Land Expropriation Commission, and cases of an objection nature filed directly with the Central Land Expropriation Commission, the disposing agency of the expropriation decision (Article 8 of the Act). That is, an objection under the Land Compensation Act must be filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the original copy of the decision (Article 83, Paragraph 3 of the Act).

[0052] In summary, an objection under the Land Compensation Act is: ① a subjective litigation because it is filed by a person whose rights or interests have been infringed upon due to the illegality or unfairness of the Land Expropriation Committee's decision; ② an appeal litigation because it seeks the cancellation or modification of the decision by asserting its illegality or unfairness; ③ a summary litigation in that the adjudication procedure is based on the principle of written examination and oral arguments are not recognized in principle; ④ a retrial litigation because it seeks the cancellation or modification of the Land Expropriation Committee's decision from the Central Land Expropriation Committee due to its illegality or unfairness; and ⑤ an administrative appeal heard and decided by the Central Land Expropriation Committee, which is an administrative agency. Therefore, the Administrative Appeals Act applies mutatis mutandis to the procedure for an objection under the Land Compensation Act.

[0053] However, if the project implementer is dissatisfied with the compensation amount determined by the competent Land Expropriation Committee, they must pay their own estimated amount and deposit the difference before filing an objection. In particular, under the Land Compensation Act, unless there are special circumstances, an objection may be filed regarding all matters concerning the expropriation decision; while it is possible to assert new facts that were not initially asserted within the scope of the expropriation decision, matters not deliberated by the Land Expropriation Committee in the expropriation decision cannot serve as grounds for an objection, nor can a decision be rendered regarding such matters even if an objection is filed. An objection shall not suspend the progress of the project or the expropriation or use of the land. (Refer to Article 88 of the Act)

[0054] Payment of Increased Compensation

[0055] With respect to compensation, the project implementer shall pay the compensation determined by the competent Land Expropriation Committee by the commencement date of expropriation or use (the date on which expropriation or use begins as determined by the Land Expropriation Committee by adjudication), except in cases of use pursuant to Article 38 or 39.

[0056] As described above, land expropriation involves numerous stages and requires the involvement of many experts before, during, and after expropriation. Accordingly, in one embodiment of the present invention, experts are provided in an open manner, and the platform of the present invention screens whether the experts' opinions or solutions are appropriate to select the optimal solution. Furthermore, by presenting analysis results regarding whether each expert's fee is appropriate, in addition to price comparisons, the party involved in land compensation can be assisted in selecting the optimal solution while minimizing the infringement of property rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

[0057] Referring to FIG. 2, the personnel pool construction unit (310) can store at least one expert terminal (400) by mapping it to at least one stage and at least one field. The experts of at least one expert terminal (400) may include a land compensation countermeasures committee, a judicial scrivener, a tax accountant, a lawyer, a securities firm, a REIT company, a trust company, an appraiser, a land replacement company, and a Special Purpose Company (SPC). However, the types of experts are not limited to those described above and are not excluded for reasons not listed.

[0058] The receiving unit (320) can receive land compensation target data from the user terminal (100). The user terminal (100) can input information regarding the land compensation target.

[0059] The transmission unit (330) can transmit the received target data to at least one expert terminal (400). At this time, the expert terminal (400) responsible for each step may be designated and requested, or each expert terminal (400) may voluntarily upload analysis data. This is because if one's analysis data is adopted as the optimal solution, it becomes a sales channel for securing related business. Here, when the data of each expert accumulates, a weight may be given to the expert's analysis data according to an evaluation system for evaluating experts, and this score may be used as quantitative data to primarily filter the analysis data.

[0060] For example, in the case of property appraisal, fairness must be ensured above all else. Since the public disclosure of real estate prices forms the foundation of national real estate policy, it provides information on land and housing prices to serve as an indicator for land and housing transactions and as a standard for taxation; therefore, a high level of credibility is required for the appraisal work. Problems with property appraisals may stem from excessive competition among some appraisal firms to be recommended as appraisers by so-called resident countermeasure committees. Specifically, issues have been pointed out such as appraisal firms verbally notifying residents of estimated compensation amounts in advance that are satisfactory to them, verbally promising compensation amounts at asking prices that include development profits, and, in the case of resident countermeasure committees in some compensation areas, demanding estimated compensation amounts in writing. Furthermore, high compensation amounts assessed by appraisers recommended by landowners out of goodwill can become the minimum compensation standard for expropriated residents in neighboring areas, thereby becoming a cause of compensation disputes related to public projects.

[0061] In order to exclude cases where analysis data is presented to secure a case, each expert may be evaluated based on the results of presenting analysis data at each expert terminal (400), and an evaluation score may be assigned according to the characteristics of each expert. At this time, an evaluation system for compensation work can be established through experts who actually conduct compensation evaluations and are directly or indirectly engaged in compensation work, such as professors from various fields, appraisers, and experts who carry out compensation entrustment work. AHP determines priorities among alternatives by capturing the evaluator's knowledge, experience, and intuition through pairwise comparison between factors. Subsequently, due to the characteristics of theoretical clarity, ease of application, and universality, it has been widely applied in the field of decision-making. In the analysis, a matrix is ​​constructed by pairwise comparing lower-level elements that contribute to upper-level elements. Here, after confirming through a survey analyzing the relationship between actual distance and relative distance using different numerical scales that a scale between 1 and 9 points shows the result closest to the actual value, a 9-point scale is mainly used. A comprehensive importance vector is calculated by aggregating weights from each layer, and subsequently, the evaluations from multiple evaluators are integrated. Various methods for integration have been proposed, but it is known that there is no significant difference regardless of which method is used. Through this process, evaluation criteria for each expert can be established and analyzed using the AHP technique. Additionally, to derive the relative importance of each task in land compensation procedures, they can be classified by spatial, temporal, and content scopes.

[0062] The aggregation unit (340) can aggregate analysis data received from at least one expert terminal (400). At least one expert terminal (400) can participate in at least one stage among the pre-, mid-, and post-stages of land compensation. At this time, the pre-, mid-, and post-stages of land compensation are stages based on the user who is the landowner.

[0063] The price comparison unit (350) can receive the optimal solution from the analysis data of at least one expert terminal (400) and provide the optimal solution to the user terminal (100). The user terminal (100) receives analysis data from at least one expert terminal (400) regarding land compensation and can receive the optimal solution from the analysis data. At this time, the most suitable solution among the analysis data is selected by the manager terminal (500). When the analysis data selected in this way is accumulated as big data, the artificial intelligence algorithm can learn and verify the big data to model the system to make a choice similar to that of the manager thereafter.

[0064] Reinforcement Learning

[0065] Reinforcement learning is an algorithm in which an agent defined in an environment receives a state as input and determines a policy that selects the action with the highest reward. Recently, deep reinforcement learning has been researched by combining it with deep learning to learn faster in more difficult environments and to solve the problem of getting stuck in a local minimum. In addition, if the agent learns the selection of the manager terminal (500) that selects the optimal solution among the analysis data, it becomes possible to learn the manager's selection method. Based on these advantages, a system can be built that can automatically select the optimal solution using deep reinforcement learning. This can use the optimal solution selected by a professional manager as data, receive the user's land compensation target data as input, and present the optimal solution predicted using DQN (Deep Q-Network) to the user.

[0066] <dqn>

[0067] Reinforcement learning is an algorithm in which an agent defined in the environment receives the state of the Observation Space as input and determines a policy to select the action with the highest reward. Q-Learning, one of the representative algorithms of reinforcement learning, is used to find the optimal policy for an agent in a finite Markov decision process. Q-Learning learns to maximize the sum of the Reward and Action Value Functions, as shown in Equation 1 below.

[0068]

[0069] Here, Q(s,a) is the Action-Value Function, which calculates the value of an action when Action a is taken from State s. Additionally, r is the Reward obtained when taking the Action, α is the Learning Rate, and γ is the Discount Factor. Although Q-Learning is used as one of the methods to solve reinforcement learning problems, it retains the same problems as Cost Minimization because it can get stuck in local minima. Therefore, DQN was developed to prevent local minima by applying CNN, a deep learning technique, to Q-Learning, and a model can be constructed using the structure of such a DQN Agent.

[0070] The Observation Space contains the information necessary for the Agent to learn, and providing sufficient information is crucial for effective learning. For example, the State is the current state that is updated whenever any of the analysis data is selected, while the Next State is the state that changes after an Action is performed and new analysis data is selected. The Target Optimal Solution is the solution most similar to the optimal solution in the expert manager's database. Learning can be performed using these States as input. An Action is the behavior the Agent can select when receiving a State. An Action List is created by compiling the analysis data that has not yet been selected into a List. Then, Actions are extracted one by one from the Action List to create the Next State, which is then combined with the State and Target Optimal Solution to form a single Action State List. This process is repeated for the number of Actions to finally generate the Observation State List. The Reward is the compensation for the Action selected by the Agent. At this stage, the Agent can be trained using two Reward Functions; through this process, analysis data similar to the manager's selection is automatically selected and provided to the user. Of course, in the case of land compensation, interests related to property rights are in sharp conflict, so the results of artificial intelligence are used as a reference, and ultimately, the presentation and selection of the final solution must be made by humans. However, if this process is repeated and a large amount of data is accumulated, artificial intelligence can continue to learn and extract the optimal solution from the analyzed data with high accuracy.

[0071] The purchasing department (360) may require the user terminal (100) to purchase a pre-configured book and input a serial number included in the book in order to receive analysis data and optimal solutions. The applicant of the present invention plans to publish and sell books and provides analysis data and optimal solutions free of charge to the buyer who purchases the book. Accordingly, when the serial number printed or included in the book is entered, the user of the user terminal (100) can authenticate the buyer, and the used serial number can be disposed of so that it cannot be reused.

[0072] The payment management unit (370) can provide analysis data and optimal solutions to the user terminal (100) when the serial number is not entered in the user terminal (100) and the pre-set consultation fee is paid.

[0073] The fee comparison unit (380) can compare prices and fees within analysis data received from at least one expert terminal (400) and provide them to the user terminal (100). At this time, rather than simply comparing the lowest prices, the fees can be compared by considering each expert's performance, reputation, cost appropriateness, etc. For example, before compensation, fees can be compared for brokering experts or firms for tax strategies and responses, such as compensation-specialized auction investment firms, the formation and operation of countermeasure committees, and pre-negotiation gifting. During compensation, fees can be compared for establishing compensation negotiation strategies, consultations on capital gains and gift taxes by tax accountants, compensation increase and expropriation by lawyers, registration work during the land expropriation process by judicial scriveneres, discounting and asset management of land compensation bonds by securities firms, and agency services for replacement land compensation by REITs, trusts, or PM companies. Furthermore, fees can be compared for post-compensation management of land for livelihood support, tax consultations on increased compensation by tax accountants, and financial arrangements and sales of replacement land compensation sites.

[0074] The upload unit (390) can receive the optimal solution uploaded from the administrator terminal after transmitting the analysis data to the administrator terminal.

[0075] Hereinafter, the operation process according to the configuration of the platform service providing server of FIG. 2 described above will be explained in detail with reference to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4. However, it is obvious that the embodiment is merely one of the various embodiments of the present invention and is not limited thereto.

[0076] Referring to FIG. 3, (a) a platform service providing server (300) databases the procedures for land compensation, and (b) recruits experts for each procedure and stage, and then maps the areas of expertise and compensation stages to build a pool of personnel. Then, when a query is input from a user terminal (100) as in (c), analysis data is collected from an expert terminal (400) as in (d), and the optimal solution among them can be uploaded from an administrator terminal (500) and provided.

[0077] The platform service provider server (300) compares fees and provides price comparisons as shown in (a) of FIG. 4, and when providing an optimal solution as shown in (b), it provides the solution for free to users whose serial numbers are authenticated by purchasing books as shown in (c), and otherwise, collects analysis data and provides the optimal solution after the pre-set consultation fee is paid. At this time, when a user selects the analysis data provided as the optimal solution, the platform service provider server (300) mediates a contract with each expert terminal (400) that provided it.

[0078] As for the details regarding the method of providing a land compensation platform service using the expert group shown in FIGS. 2 to 4 that are not explained, they are identical to or can be easily inferred from the details regarding the method of providing a land compensation platform service using the expert group shown in FIG. 1, so further explanation will be omitted.

[0079] FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the process of data transmission and reception between each component included in the land compensation platform service provision system using the expert group of FIG. 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention. Hereinafter, an example of the process of data transmission and reception between each component will be described through FIG. 5, but the present invention is not to be interpreted as being limited to such an embodiment, and it is obvious to those skilled in the art that the process of data transmission and reception shown in FIG. 5 may be changed according to various embodiments described above.

[0080] Referring to FIG. 5, the platform service providing server stores at least one expert terminal by mapping it to at least one stage and at least one field (S5100).

[0081] And, the platform service provider server receives land compensation target data from a user terminal (S5200) and transmits the received target data to at least one expert terminal (S5300).

[0082] Additionally, the platform service providing server collects analysis data received from at least one expert terminal (S5400), receives an optimal solution from the analysis data of at least one expert terminal, and provides the optimal solution to the user terminal (S5500).

[0083] The order of the steps described above (S5100~S5500) is merely an example and is not limited thereto. That is, the order of the steps described above (S5100~S5500) may vary, and some of these steps may be executed simultaneously or deleted.

[0084] As for matters not described regarding the method of providing a land compensation platform service using an expert group as shown in Fig. 5, they are identical to or can be easily inferred from the description of the method of providing a land compensation platform service using an expert group described above through Figs. 1 to 4, so further explanation will be omitted.

[0085] The method for providing a land compensation platform service using an expert group according to one embodiment described through FIG. 5 may also be implemented in the form of a recording medium containing computer-executable instructions, such as an application or program module executed by a computer. A computer-readable medium may be any available medium accessible by a computer and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, and both removable and non-removable media. Additionally, a computer-readable medium may include all computer storage media. Computer storage media include both volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented by any method or technique for storing information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data.

[0086] The method for providing a land compensation platform service using an expert group according to one embodiment of the present invention described above may be executed by an application basically installed on a terminal (which may include a program included in a platform or operating system, etc., basically installed on the terminal), or it may be executed by an application (i.e., a program) directly installed by a user on a master terminal through an application providing server, such as an application store server, an application, or a web server related to the service. In this sense, the method for providing a land compensation platform service using an expert group according to one embodiment of the present invention described above may be implemented as an application (i.e., a program) that is basically installed on the terminal or directly installed by a user, and may be recorded on a computer-readable recording medium such as a terminal.

[0087] The foregoing description of the present invention is for illustrative purposes only, and those skilled in the art will understand that other specific forms can be easily modified without altering the technical spirit or essential features of the present invention. Therefore, the embodiments described above should be understood as illustrative in all respects and not restrictive. For example, each component described as a single unit may be implemented in a distributed manner, and components described as distributed may likewise be implemented in a combined form.

[0088] The scope of the present invention is defined by the claims set forth below rather than by the detailed description above, and all modifications or variations derived from the meaning and scope of the claims and equivalent concepts thereof should be interpreted as being included within the scope of the present invention.< / dqn>

Claims

Claim 1 At least one expert terminal participating in at least one stage among the pre-, mid-, and post-stages of land compensation; a user terminal receiving analysis data regarding the land compensation from the at least one expert terminal; A platform service providing server comprising: a personnel pool building unit that stores at least one expert terminal by mapping it to at least one stage and at least one field; a receiving unit that receives land compensation target data from the user terminal; a transmitting unit that transmits the received target data to the at least one expert terminal; a collecting unit that collects analysis data received from the at least one expert terminal; a price comparison unit that receives a solution based on the collected analysis data and provides it to the user terminal; a purchasing unit that requires the user terminal to purchase a pre-set book and input a serial number included in the book in order to receive the analysis data and the solution; a payment management unit that provides the analysis data and the solution to the user terminal when the serial number is not entered at the user terminal and when a pre-set consultation fee is paid; and a fee comparison unit that compares prices and fees within the analysis data received from the at least one expert terminal and provides them to the user terminal.It includes, wherein the experts of at least one expert terminal include the Land Compensation Measures Committee, judicial scrivener, tax accountant, lawyer, securities firm, REIT company, trust company, appraiser, land replacement company, and SPC (Special Purpose Company); the price comparison unit is configured to train and verify the big data accumulated as the manager terminal selects the most suitable optimal solution among the aggregated analysis data using an artificial intelligence algorithm, wherein an agent defined in the environment receives the State of the Observation Space (current state and Next State that changes after selecting new analysis data) as input, extracts an Action from the Action List generated from the list of analysis data not yet selected, and performs Deep Q-Network (DQN) deep reinforcement learning applying CNN to Q-Learning to select the Action with the largest Reward based on the finally generated Observation State List, thereby automatically predicting and extracting the target optimal solution most similar to the optimal solution in the expert manager's database and presenting it to the user terminal; and the fee comparison unit determines the fee by multidimensionally considering each expert's performance, reputation, and cost appropriateness, rather than a simple lowest price comparison method. A system for providing land compensation platform services using an expert group, characterized by comparing, in the 'pre-' stage of the aforementioned land compensation, brokerage fees for investment firms specializing in compensation auctions, fees for the formation and operation of a countermeasures committee, and fees for pre-gift tax strategies; in the 'middle' stage, fees for establishing compensation negotiation strategies, consultation fees for capital gains tax and gift tax, fees for litigation regarding compensation increase and expropriation, fees for land expropriation registration, fees for land compensation bond discounting and asset management, and agency fees for replacement land compensation; and in the 'post-' stage, fees for operating livelihood support land, tax consultation fees for increased compensation, and fees for financial arrangement and distribution of replacement land compensation land, mutually comparing them in a manner customized to the characteristics of each expert and stage, and providing them to the aforementioned user terminal. Claim 2 delete Claim 3 delete Claim 4 delete Claim 5 delete Claim 6 delete

Images