Legal service providing system

Abstract

The present invention relates to a legal service provision system and comprises: a terminal receiving inquiry information regarding a case from a user; an inquiry server communicating with the terminal to proceed with the inquiry regarding the case and transmitting the inquiry content when the inquiry is completed; a classification server receiving the inquiry content from the inquiry server, classifying the received inquiry content into keywords, and transmitting the classified keywords; a collection server collecting statute and case law data using the keywords received from the classification server and transmitting the collected information; an answer server receiving the collected information from the collection server, generating answer information regarding the inquiry content based on the received statute and case law data, and transmitting the generated answer information to the terminal; and a document drafting server receiving the answer information from the answer server and guiding the drafting of legal documents related to the inquiry content to the terminal based on the received answer information.

Description

Technology Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a legal service provision system, and more specifically, to a system capable of providing more convenient and accurate legal services to users. Background Technology

[0002] Generally, even if ordinary people wish to appeal to the law regarding a grievance, it is very difficult to meet with a lawyer, discuss the matter, and receive advice comfortably. Furthermore, high legal fees—ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of won for a consultation lasting just a few tens of minutes—are a burden for the general public. Beyond the high costs, it is common in the legal market that even if one pays the fee, they must first meet with a paralegal rather than a lawyer to receive a consultation. Moreover, it is all too common for the actual consultation time to be very short even when one does meet with a lawyer.

[0003] Meanwhile, despite self-representation accounting for over 70% of all civil lawsuits, the reality is that services for this purpose are lacking. With the advancement of technology, legal services have become democratized, and market barriers must be lowered so that anyone can easily access them.

[0004] Furthermore, legal documents such as complaints are difficult for the general public to draft directly, and requesting drafting services also entails significant time and cost. Prior art literature

[0005] (Patent Document 0001) KR 10-2023-0072214 A (Publication Date 2023.05.24.) The problem to be solved

[0006] The present invention has been devised to solve the technical problems described above. The objective of the legal service provision system according to the present invention is to provide a legal service provision system that allows a user to more conveniently inquire about a case when one occurs, receive answers regarding the type of case, relevant laws, and precedents, and guide the user in drafting legal documents simply and effectively. means of solving the problem

[0007] A legal service provision system according to the present invention for solving the technical problem described above comprises: a terminal receiving inquiry information regarding a case from a user; an inquiry server communicating with the terminal to proceed with the inquiry regarding the case and transmitting the inquiry content when the inquiry is completed; a classification server receiving the inquiry content from the inquiry server, classifying the received inquiry content into keywords, and transmitting the classified keywords; a collection server collecting statute and case law data using the keywords received from the classification server and transmitting the collected information; an answer server receiving the collected information from the collection server, generating answer information regarding the inquiry content based on the received statute and case law data, and transmitting the generated answer information to the terminal; and a document drafting server receiving the answer information from the answer server and guiding the drafting of legal documents related to the inquiry content to the terminal based on the received answer information.

[0008] In addition, the query server receives a query entered by a user from the terminal, and if the received query does not include essential information, it sends a message requesting essential information to the terminal, and the query server is learned through a data set, and the data set includes the query content, whether the query content includes essential information, and the type of essential information.

[0009] In addition, the classification server includes an analysis unit that converts the content of a query received from the query server based on laws and regulations, and a classification unit that extracts keywords from the content converted by the analysis unit and re-extracts keywords based on the extracted keywords.

[0010] In addition, the collection server includes a search unit that searches for statutes and precedent data in a database based on keywords separated by the classification unit, and a collection unit that extracts information corresponding to the user's query from the statutes and precedent data searched by the search unit.

[0011] Additionally, the answer server includes an output unit that outputs answer information collected from the collection server and an output control unit that controls the output unit to control the information output from the output unit, and the output control unit controls the output unit so that answer information regarding the user's query and precedents related to the answer are output together from the output unit.

[0012] Additionally, the document creation server comprises a document provision unit that provides a legal document corresponding to a case, in which at least a portion including the answer information is created; a document creation unit that provides guide information for creating the legal document based on the legal document provided by the document provision unit; and a review request unit that transmits the legal document, which has been completed through the document provision unit and the document creation unit, to at least one of the stored experts to request a review.

[0013] In addition, expert information is stored in the document creation server, and the expert information includes personal information, occupation, field of expertise, and location information for each expert. The review request unit selects at least one of the stored experts based on the type of legal document created and the field of expertise of each expert, and transmits the legal document to the selected expert to request a review.

[0014] In addition, expert information is stored in the document creation server, and the expert information includes personal information, occupation, specialized field, and location information for each expert. The review request unit requests a review of a legal document from an expert located within a preset distance based on the location information of the terminal, based on the location information of each expert. Effects of the invention

[0015] According to the legal service provision system of various embodiments of the present invention as described above, answers to a user's legal inquiries can be received using artificial intelligence, thereby enabling the user to receive legal services more conveniently and effectively.

[0016] In addition, according to the present invention, the classification server classifies user queries by keywords, thereby enabling more effective collection of statutes and precedents.

[0017] In addition, according to the present invention, there is an effect of guiding the drafting of legal documents along with answers to user inquiries. Brief explanation of the drawing

[0018] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a legal service provision system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a detailed block diagram of a legal service provision system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 3 is an exemplary diagram of a query server and an answer server of a legal service provision system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 4 is an exemplary diagram of a classification server of a legal service provision system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 5 is an exemplary diagram of a collection server of a legal service provision system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 6 is an example diagram of a document creation unit of a legal service provision system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Specific details for implementing the invention

[0019] The objects, features, and advantages of the present invention described above will become more apparent through the following embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings. The specific structural or functional descriptions below are merely illustrative for the purpose of explaining embodiments according to the concept of the present invention, and embodiments according to the concept of the present invention may be implemented in various forms and should not be interpreted as being limited to the embodiments described in this specification or application. Since embodiments according to the concept of the present invention may be subject to various modifications and may take various forms, specific embodiments are illustrated in the drawings and described in detail in this specification or application. However, this is not intended to limit embodiments according to the concept of the present invention to specific disclosed forms, and should be understood to include all modifications, equivalents, and substitutions that fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Terms such as "first" and / or "second" may be used to describe various components, but said components are not limited to said terms. The above terms may be used solely for the purpose of distinguishing one component from other components, for example, without departing from the scope of rights according to the concept of the present invention, such that the first component may be named the second component, and similarly, the second component may be named the first component. When it is stated that a component is connected to or coupled with another component, it should be understood that it may be directly connected to or coupled with that other component, or that there may be other components in between. On the other hand, when it is stated that a component is directly connected to or directly coupled with another component, it should be understood that there are no other components in between. Other expressions used to describe the relationship between components, such as between, immediately between, adjacent to, and directly adjacent to, should be interpreted in the same way.The terms used in this specification are used merely to describe specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the invention. Singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Terms such as "include" or "have" in this specification are intended to indicate the existence of the described features, numbers, steps, actions, components, parts, or combinations thereof, and should not be understood as precluding the existence or addition of one or more other features, numbers, steps, actions, components, parts, or combinations thereof. Unless otherwise defined, all terms used herein, including technical or scientific terms, have the same meaning as generally understood by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. Terms such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant technology, and should not be interpreted in an ideal or overly formal sense unless explicitly defined in this specification. The invention will be described in detail below by describing preferred embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings. Identical reference numerals in each drawing indicate identical components.

[0020] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a legal service provision system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a detailed block diagram of a legal service provision system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

[0021] As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, a legal service provision system according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a terminal (10), a query server (100), a classification server (200), a collection server (300), an answer server (400), and a document creation server (500).

[0022] The terminal (10) is an electronic device that receives query information according to the user's operation.

[0023] The terminal (10) may be an electronic device including various input devices to receive query information according to user operation, and may be capable of communicating with the query server (100) described later. For example, the terminal (10) may be a general electronic device such as a smartphone, PC, or tablet, and may have the functions described above, namely, the ability for a user to input query information and to communicate with other servers described later. As another example, the terminal (10) may be implemented as a dedicated electronic device for using the legal service provision system according to the present invention.

[0024] The user can input query information into the terminal (10) through a device such as a microphone, keyboard, microphone, or a display equipped with a touch sensor. The user can input query content in the form of a sentence into the terminal (10).

[0025] The query server (100) communicates with the terminal (10) and performs a query regarding an event. Here, communication can be performed through various communication methods such as wired internet, wireless internet, and mobile communication networks. More specifically, when the query server (100) transmits a message requesting a query regarding an event to the terminal (10), the terminal (10) can output the received message to an output device included in the terminal (10) to induce the user to input the details of the event through the terminal (10). Here, the output device may include at least one of a display and a speaker included in the terminal (10).

[0026] The query server (100) receives the query content entered by the user through the terminal (10) and, if it determines that there is a part of the received query content that is insufficient, it may send a message to the terminal (10) requesting additional input regarding the insufficient part. For example, the query content entered by the user must necessarily include information about who, when, and what was done in order to ascertain the facts, but in the case of a user without legal knowledge, the query content may be entered into the terminal (10) while omitting information that can ascertain these facts. That is, supplementation may be necessary for such a situation.

[0027] The query server (100) analyzes the content of a query entered by a user received from a terminal (10), and if there is no information that must be included in the content of the query, it can send a message to the terminal (10) requesting additional input regarding the information that must be included.

[0028] The above-described operation of the query server (100) can be learned by the query server (100) through a data set regarding the content of the query entered by the user, whether the content of the query is suitable for use in other servers in the future, whether the content of the query includes essential information, and the types of essential information. Through the above-described learning process, the query server (100) can obtain necessary information more accurately from the user.

[0029] When communication between the query server (100) and the terminal (10) ends during the query input process, that is, when the user has fully entered the query content through the terminal (10), the query server (100) receives the query content from the terminal (10) and transmits the received query content to the classification server (200).

[0030] The classification server (200) classifies the query content received from the query server (100) into keywords and transmits the classified keyword information to the outside.

[0031] As illustrated in FIG. 2, the classification server (200) includes an analysis unit (210) and a classification unit (220).

[0032] The analysis unit (210) converts the content of the query received from the query server (100) based on legal provisions. To explain the analysis unit (210) more specifically, the content of the query made by the user may be in terms used by the general public and may not be legal terms. The analysis unit (210) changes the content of the query received from the query server (100) into words and sentences frequently used in legal provisions in order to provide services based more accurately on the content of the query at the subsequent collection server (300), answer server (400), and document creation server (500). For example, if we assume that the user's query sent by the query server (100) to the analysis unit (210) is "I uploaded a cover of a singer's song. I received a copyright infringement warning, what should I do?", terms such as singer, song, and upload included in this question may not be legal terms. The analysis unit (210), in relation to the example of the inquiry content described above, may modify it to include legal terms, such as, "A user has received an infringement warning (or account suspension notice) from the copyright holder for infringing the reproduction and public transmission rights under the Copyright Act by covering a musical work and uploading it to an internet platform (public transmission) without the permission of the original copyright holder (music copyright holder and neighboring rights holder). Is it possible that the relevant usage act falls under the exemption provisions of the Copyright Act, and in this case, what are the legal objection procedures regarding the warning or solutions through agreement with the rights holder?" The analysis unit (210) considers the modification of the inquiry content as described above to be very important in that it enables higher accuracy in providing legal advice through other configurations of the present invention to be described later.

[0033] The analysis unit (210) can also be trained through a separate data set, just like the query server (100) described earlier, and the data set used for training the analysis unit (210) may include query content and sentences converted from query content based on laws.

[0034] The classification unit (220) extracts keywords included in the query content converted by the analysis unit (210) and re-extracts keywords based on the extracted keywords. For convenience of explanation, the keywords primarily extracted by the classification unit (220) are referred to as primary keywords, and the keywords re-extracted based on the primary keywords are referred to as secondary keywords. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the classification unit (220) may include a first classification unit (221) that extracts primary keywords and a second classification unit (222) that re-extracts secondary keywords based on the extracted primary keywords.

[0035] Each of the first classification unit (221) and the second classification unit (222) may be implemented as an electronic device or an electronic device including an electronic device programmed to perform the operation as described above.

[0036] The second classification unit (222) can re-extract the primary keywords into secondary keywords according to the type of event and laws. For example, in the case of the query content converted by the analysis unit (210) described earlier, the primary keywords may include user, original work, musical work, cover, internet platform upload, public transmission, infringement of reproduction rights, infringement of public transmission rights, infringement warning, and account suspension notification. Based on the primary keywords, the second classification unit (222) re-extracts keywords such as copyright law, reproduction rights, public transmission rights, original copyright holder, neighboring rights holder, exemption provisions under copyright law, legal objection procedure, agreement with rights holder, and solution as secondary keywords according to the type of event and laws.

[0037] When extracting keywords from a user's query in the first classification unit (221), it may not be possible to extract accurate keywords if existing semantic technology is used. More specifically, the trend in existing search technology is to search for information using semantic technology, which vectorizes data to access information close to related search terms. However, semantic technology is less accurate than search results in a second language, such as English, when a first language, such as Korean, Chinese, or Vietnamese, is used. To solve this problem, the classification server (200) may include a character conversion unit (230).

[0038] The character conversion unit (230) converts the keywords of the first language extracted from the first classification unit (221) into English, the second language, and outputs them to the second classification unit (222). The second classification unit (222) compares and searches the primary keywords converted into the second language with separate legal data preprocessed into a vector DB to re-extract accurate secondary keywords.

[0039] The operation of the classification server (200) as described above uses Natural Language Processing to accurately analyze sentences and extract keywords. The classification server (200) transmits the extracted secondary keywords to the collection server (300).

[0040] The collection server (300) collects statute and case law data based on secondary keywords received from the classification server (200). To this end, the collection server (300) can communicate with national agencies such as courts and local governments.

[0041] More specifically, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the collection server (300) includes a search unit (310) and a collection unit (320).

[0042] The search unit (310) searches for statutes and precedent data based on secondary keywords received from the classification server (200) above. The search unit (310) can search for statute information by connecting to a database where statutes and precedent data are stored, for example, the database of the Ministry of Government Legislation, which is one of the government ministries, and can search for precedent data by connecting to a database of the Supreme Court, which is one of the judicial institutions.

[0043] The collection unit (320) collects necessary data from the statutes and precedent data searched by the search unit (310).

[0044] Since the statutes and precedent data collected by the collection unit (320) is relatively large amount of information, it may be difficult for the user to use it immediately. Therefore, it is necessary to perform the task of organizing and editing the statutes and precedent data collected by the collection unit (320), and for this purpose, the collection server (300) further includes an editing unit (330).

[0045] The editing department (330) modifies and edits the statutes and case law data collected by the collection department (320) into content corresponding to the user's query and outputs it.

[0046] The content output from the editing department (330) can be transmitted to the answer server (400).

[0047] As illustrated in FIG. 2, the answer server (400) receives information from the collection server (300), generates answer information for the query based on the received statutes and precedent data, and transmits the generated answer information to the terminal (10).

[0048] The answer server (400) includes an output unit (410) and an output control unit (420).

[0049] The output unit (410) outputs information collected from the collection server (300). The information output from the output unit (410) is transmitted to the terminal (10).

[0050] The output control unit (420) controls the information output from the output unit (410), and can control the output unit (410) so that the answer to the user's query, i.e., the information received from the collection server (300), is output from the output unit (410), and the case law is output together, so that the answer to the query is output together with the case law.

[0051] The output control unit (420) can control the output unit (410) to output the case law together, but this can be changed by the user's choice. For example, before the output control unit (420) outputs the answer information and the case law together to the output unit (410), the output control unit (420) may send a message to the terminal (10) asking whether it wants to output the case law together. After the user checks the message received through the terminal (10) and decides whether to output the case law, the terminal (10) sends a signal containing the decided output status of the case law to the output control unit (420) of the answer server (400), and the output control unit (420) may output the answer and the case law together or output only the answer based on the received signal.

[0052] When the output control unit (420) transmits an answer to the terminal (10) through the output unit (410) so that the answer is displayed on the terminal (10), it can display not only the content of how to respond but also the legal basis upon which the answer was derived. In the present invention, by controlling the output unit (410) through the output control unit (420) to display the legal basis and precedents together with the answer, the user can be provided with greater transparency and reliability of the answer.

[0053] The above answer server (400) may further include a proposal section (430).

[0054] After the answer content or the answer and case law information is output from the output unit (410), the proposal unit (430) sends a message to the terminal (10) proposing a legal document to the user. When the user accepts the creation of the proposed legal document through the terminal (10), the document creation server (500) proceeds with the creation of the legal document.

[0055] The answer server (400) can generate information such as the probability of winning and the estimated cost when the user proceeds with legal proceedings based on the generated answer information and existing searched laws and precedents, and can transmit this to the terminal (10).

[0056] The classification server (200), collection server (300), and answer server (400) can generate answer information from the other party's perspective by re-performing the previously described process from the other party's perspective regarding the query content written by the user. This is intended to enable the user of the legal service provision system according to the present invention to understand the case from a more diverse perspective. The answer server (400) can transmit the answer information written from the other party's perspective to the terminal (10). In particular, the answer server (400) can generate answer information including an optimal response strategy based on the answer information generated from the other party's perspective.

[0057] After receiving answer information from the answer server (400), the document creation server (500) guides the terminal (10) to create a legal document for a case related to the inquiry content based on the received answer information.

[0058] As illustrated in FIG. 2, the document creation server (500) includes a document provision unit (510) and a document creation unit (520).

[0059] The document provider (510) provides a legal document based on the answer information received from the answer server (400) to the terminal (10). The legal document may be of various types of documents containing the answer information. Some examples include legal documents such as a contract, complaint, answer, opinion, or appeal corresponding to the content of the inquiry and the answer information, or documents such as a notarized document, a registration document, or a certificate.

[0060] However, the legal documents provided by the document provision unit (510) may not contain all necessary information. For example, a user may have entered only the content of a query regarding a specific case through the terminal (10), but in addition to this information, missing information such as the user's personal information and the other party's information is required to proceed with legal procedures. Therefore, a process to induce the input of such insufficient information may be necessary, and the document creation unit (520) sends a message to the terminal (10) inducing the input of information regarding the parts omitted from the legal documents provided by the document provision unit (510).

[0061] The document creation unit (520) can not only send a message to the terminal (10) that simply prompts the input of information regarding the missing parts, but also send an example of the created legal document to the terminal (10).

[0062] Legal documents created in the document creation unit (520) are not immediately submitted to relevant agencies, but can be requested for review by registered experts, which is performed in the review request unit (530). Expert information may be stored in the document creation server (500), and the expert information may include personal information, occupation, specialized field, and location information for each expert. Here, the location information for each expert may be at least one of the location information of the individual expert and the location information of the business entity operated by the expert. In addition, regarding the occupation information for each expert, while it may generally be a lawyer, there may also be legal scriveners, labor consultants, patent attorneys, administrative scriveners, etc. This is because legal scriveners, labor consultants, patent attorneys, and administrative scriveners may possess more expertise than lawyers depending on the type of case.

[0063] The review of legal documents created on the document creation server (500) as described above can be determined by the user's choice.

[0064] If a user chooses to request an expert review of a legal document created on the document creation server (500), the review request unit (530) may request a review from an expert with a high degree of relevance based on the correlation between the type of legal document created and the expert's field of expertise. The method of requesting a review of a legal document on the document creation server (500) may be carried out by transmitting the legal document to a terminal used by the expert.

[0065] Additionally, if the user chooses to request expert review of a legal document created on the document creation server (500), the review request unit (530) may request a review of the legal document from an expert located within a pre-set distance among the experts stored in advance, based on the location information of the user's terminal (10). This is intended to encourage the user to more conveniently request the relevant expert when direct legal procedures, such as litigation, are carried out in the future. When the review request unit (530) requests a review of the legal document from an expert based on the location information of the terminal (10), a process may precede in which the review request unit (530) requests location information from the terminal (10) and the terminal (10) transmits location information to the review request unit (530).

[0066] Selecting a specific expert based on the aforementioned specialized field and the location information of the terminal (10), and requesting the selected expert to review legal documents, can be used together.

[0067] The review request unit (530) may request a review of the written legal document from at least two of the stored experts. This is to prevent potential human error. Experts may transmit their review opinions to the review request unit (530) through the terminals they use. If the review opinions received from each expert match, the review request unit (530) may transmit the review opinions to the terminal (10). If the review opinions received from each expert do not match, the review request unit (530) may request a review of the written legal document from other experts excluding the relevant expert.

[0068] When the review request unit (530) requests a review of a legal document from an expert, it can transmit a message to the expert terminal that includes a request for other opinions and whether it is acceptable to proceed with legal proceedings using the legal document, along with the legal document itself. Only when multiple experts have evaluated positively whether it is acceptable to proceed with legal proceedings, can the review opinions be transmitted to the terminal (10). The reason for including the opinion on whether it is acceptable to proceed with legal proceedings and other opinions in the message is that there may be issues such as simple typographical errors in the legal document.

[0069] More specifically, the above-described operation of the review request unit (530) is defined as follows: the review request unit (530) requests a review of a legal document from at least four experts located within a reference distance from the terminal (10) based on the location information of the terminal (10). As previously explained, the review opinion of the legal document may include whether legal proceedings can be carried out with the legal document for which a review was requested, as well as other opinions.

[0070] After receiving review opinions from each expert, if 70% or more of the opinions among the received review opinions from each expert agree on whether legal proceedings can proceed with the legal document requested for review, the review request unit (530) organizes the received review opinions to generate a final review opinion and then transmits the final review opinion to the terminal (10). At this time, other opinions may be organized and included in the generated final review opinion. If 70% or more of the opinions on whether legal proceedings can proceed with the legal document requested for review do not agree, the review request unit (530) may request a review of the legal document from at least four other experts among the remaining experts, excluding the experts who were previously requested for review in the first instance, among the previously stored expert information, in order to receive a review opinion with higher accuracy.

[0071] If the review request department (530) does not receive a review opinion within 24 hours from the time it requested a review of the legal document from each expert, it may additionally request a review of the legal document from another expert.

[0072] Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the embodiments disclosed in the present invention are intended only to illustrate, not to limit, the technical scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the technical scope of the present invention includes not only each disclosed embodiment but also combinations of the disclosed embodiments, and furthermore, the scope of the technical scope of the present invention is not limited by such embodiments. In addition, a person skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains can make numerous changes and modifications to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims, and all such appropriate changes and modifications should be deemed to fall within the scope of the present invention as equivalents. Explanation of the symbols

[0073] 10: Terminal 100: Query Server 200: Classification Server 210: Analysis Department 220: Classification section 221: Classification Unit 1 222: Classification Unit 2 230: Character conversion unit 300: Collection Server 310: Search Department 320: Collection Department 330: Editorial Department 400: Response Server 410: Output section 420: Output control unit 430: Proposal Department 500: Document creation server 510: Document Provision Department 520: Document Creation Department 530: Review Request Department

Claims

Claim 1 A terminal that receives input of a query regarding a case from a user; a query server that communicates with the terminal to proceed with a query regarding the case and transmits the query content when the query is completed; a classification server that receives the query content from the query server, classifies the received query content into keywords, and transmits the classified keywords; a collection server that collects statute and precedent data using the keywords received from the classification server and transmits the collected information; and an answer server that receives the collected information from the collection server, generates answer information regarding the query content based on the received statute and precedent data, and transmits the generated answer information to the terminal. and a document drafting server that receives the answer information from the answer server and guides the terminal to draft legal documents related to the case concerning the inquiry content based on the received answer information; wherein the inquiry server receives the inquiry content entered by a user from the terminal, and if the received inquiry content does not include essential information, sends a message requesting essential information to the terminal; the inquiry server is learned through a data set, and the data set includes the inquiry content, whether the inquiry content includes essential information, and the type of essential information; and the classification server includes an analysis unit that converts the inquiry content received from the inquiry server based on laws and regulations; and a classification unit; and a character conversion unit; wherein the classification unit includes a first classification unit that extracts primary keywords from query content composed of a first language including Korean, Chinese, and Vietnamese, which is converted by the analysis unit; the character conversion unit outputs keywords converted from the primary keywords into English, which is a second language; and the classification unit further includes a second classification unit that receives the keywords output by the character conversion unit and re-extracts secondary keywords based on the received keywords; and the collection server includes a search unit that searches for statutes and precedent data in a database based on the keywords extracted by the classification unit; and a collection unit that extracts information corresponding to the user's query content from the statutes and precedent data searched by the search unit.The system includes, wherein the answer server comprises: an output unit that outputs answer information based on the statutes and precedent data collected by the collection server; and an output control unit that controls the output unit to control the information output from the output unit; wherein the output control unit controls the output unit to output together answer information regarding the user's query, answer information from the counterparty's perspective regarding the user's query, precedents related to the answer, and response strategies from the output unit; and the document creation server comprises: a document provision unit that provides a legal document corresponding to a case, in which at least a portion is created including the answer information; a document creation unit that provides guide information for creating the legal document based on the legal document provided by the document provision unit; and a review request unit that transmits the legal document completed through the document provision unit and the document creation unit to at least one of the stored experts to request a review.It includes, wherein expert information is stored in the document creation server, and the expert information includes personal information, occupation, specialized field, and location information for each expert. The review request unit requests a review of a legal document from experts located within a preset distance based on the location information of the terminal, based on the location information of each expert. It requests a review of the legal document from at least four experts, and requests the review to include in the review opinion whether legal proceedings should proceed with the legal document requested for review and other opinions. After receiving review opinions from each expert, if 70% or more of the expert opinions among the received review opinions agree on whether legal proceedings should proceed with the legal document requested for review, the received review opinions are organized to generate a final review opinion, and the final review opinion is transmitted to the terminal. If 70% or more of the expert opinions do not agree on whether legal proceedings should proceed with the legal document requested for review, among the remaining experts excluding the expert who has already transmitted the review opinion, at least A legal service provision system that requests a review of a legal document from four different experts, and requests a review from additional experts if a review opinion is not received from each expert within 24 hours of the request. Claim 2 delete Claim 3 delete Claim 4 delete Claim 5 delete Claim 6 delete Claim 7 ◈Claim 7 was abandoned upon payment of the establishment registration fee.◈ In Claim 1, the above-mentioned review request unit is a legal service provision system that selects at least one of the experts stored based on the type of legal document created and the specialized field of each expert, and transmits the legal document to the selected expert to request a review. Claim 8 delete

Images