A method for automated collective decision-making in a social system based on quantitative assessment of social impact and an automated system for its implementation

Claims

1. A method of automated collective decision-making in a social system based on a quantitative assessment of the impact of subjects on the social system, expressed in units of social impact assessment (hereinafter referred to as merit; synonymous designations of units of accounting and the applicability of the method regardless of the name of the said units of accounting - in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 25), implemented by an automated computer system containing data storage facilities and data processing facilities, where the subject is an individual, or a collective subject in accordance with the preamble of paragraph.25, or an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, or another machine learning model, wherein the system contains a social capital accounting subsystem that maintains individual accounts of numerical accounting units for subjects (hereinafter referred to as merit; synonymous designations and applicability of the method regardless of the name of the said accounting units - in accordance with the preamble to paragraph 25); wherein the subject's merit account is implemented by a single entry or a set of related entries, within which the functions of merit are implemented in accordance with the preamble to paragraph25; the form of implementation and the name of the specified records do not affect the applicability of this method; this method does not create legally binding obligations for the subjects of the system and other persons with respect to the disposal of any assets, and the actual disposal of any assets as a result of the collective decision procedures of the system is carried out by subjects outside this system, including:. - maintaining an individual record in the system’s data storage facilities for each subject - an account of the subject’s merits; - implementation by the system of a collective decision procedure in which subjects contribute merits from their merit accounts to the procedure; - changing the records stored in the system’s data storage facilities in accordance with the result of the specified procedure, characterized in that: (1) the operation of using merits by a subject - including a contribution to a collective decision procedure and other use operations provided for by the rules of the system - is carried out by a subsystem of the system in such a way that the total amount of merits used by the subject within the limits of one collective decision procedure or another interval of recording of use determined by the rules of the system does not exceed the current value of the merit account of this subject at the time of the operation; in order to ensure the specified limitation, during the use operation, the system registers in the data storage means a system record of the used amount, implemented in one of the open class forms: (a) by decreasing the numerical value of the subject's merit account by the amount used; (b) by recording the amount used in a separate system record of the use operation without changing the numerical value of the account;(c) temporary binding of the used amount of merit for the period of the usage accounting interval; (d) another system operation that ensures the accounting of the used amount when determining the amount available for subsequent usage operations in the same accounting interval; the form of implementation of the specified system record and its name do not affect the applicability of this method; other operations for changing the numerical value of the subject's merit account are performed by the system subsystems in accordance with the system rules; (2) the subject of the collective decision procedure of the system is the change of records stored in the data storage means of the system about the state of the social system and / or its organizational structure, which, in particular, include: records about the distribution of the common resources of the collective entity between entities and / or other recipients; records about the substitution of elective roles and positions; records about the rules, norms and parameters of the system; records about the status of the entity in the collective entity; records about the information objects of the collective entity; other records of the system; the list of the specified items is open; (3) the change in the records stored by the system specified in item (2) of this paragraph occurs as a consequence of a collective decision procedure in which subjects contribute merits by spending from their merit accounts, and the ratio between the total volume of merits contributed to the procedure and the volume of the change recorded in the system record is not a conversion rate constant predetermined by the system, but is calculated dynamically by the system for each collective decision procedure based on its current state; the actual disposal of any assets as a result of the collective decision procedure is carried out by subjects outside this system; (4) the parameters of the collective decision procedure of the relevant evaluation circuit, including the rules for accepting deposits, the rules for determining the decision-making threshold, the rules for taking into account the weighting coefficients of deposits, and other parameters of the procedure, are established, changed, or cancelled by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the said evaluation circuit, This ensures the machine-verifiable integrity and auditability of operations for changing the records stored by the system on the state of the social system and / or its organizational structure; the impossibility of changing the numerical value of the merit score of subjects except through operations of the system's subsystems according to the system's rules; the constitutive dependence of the volume of changes recorded in the system's records on the current state of the collective decision procedure; and the sovereignty of each evaluation circuit in establishing the rules of the collective decision procedure of this circuit.

2. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the following are adopted as rules of the corresponding evaluation circuit, established by the collective decision procedure in accordance with feature (4) of paragraph 1: rules for accepting contributions to the procedure; rules for determining the decision-making threshold; rules for periodically replenishing the merit registers; rules for taking into account the weighting coefficients of contributions; rules for inter-level conversion; rules for the operation of the evaluation subsystem, if such is used in the specified evaluation circuit; other rules; the list of the specified rules is open.

3. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that during the operation of spending merits by a subject in the collective decision procedure, the write-off source - a specific merit account register from among the registers maintained by the system - is selected in a cascade manner depending on the type of operation, the sign and direction of the contribution and the role of the subject in the procedure, in accordance with a predetermined rule for the order of write-off.

4. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1 is the distribution of a resource between entities - a general fund, a bonus fund, a cooperative program fund, accumulated donations, property assets, shares, options, stakes in a project, grants, access to tangible and intangible resources, discounts, or another distributed resource - in which the priority or order of access of an applicant to a resource is determined by the amount of merits expended by him in the procedure relative to the amounts expended by other applicants; the resource fund may be replenished, including by an entity external to the group in which the procedure is being carried out; wherein the ratio between the total volume of merits entered into the procedure and the total volume of the distributed resource recorded in the record is not a constant predetermined by the system, but is calculated by the system based on the current state of the procedure;the actual disposal of the said resource is carried out by entities outside the present system, and the present method only ensures the recording in the system of the distribution record as a result of the collective decision procedure.

5. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the procedure of the collective decision according to paragraph 1 is the replacement of an elective role or position in a collective entity, in which the outcome is determined by the expenditure of merits by the participants in favor of the candidates, and the change in the records stored by the system is the assignment of an elective role or position to one of the candidates.

6. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1 is the adoption, modification, or cancellation of a rule, norm, or system parameter, including a parameter of the evaluation subsystem (if one is used in the system), a parameter of the collective decision procedure, a system classifier, or another system parameter; the result of the procedure is a change in the records stored by the system about the corresponding rule, norm, or parameter.

7. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the procedure of the collective decision according to paragraph 1 is the acceptance, change or cancellation of the status of a subject in a collective subject, including admission to a collective subject, exclusion from a collective subject, appointment or removal of a subject role, or other change in the status of a subject; the result of the procedure is a change in the records stored by the system about the corresponding status.

8. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the procedure of the collective decision according to paragraph 1 is the acceptance, modification, or cancellation of an information object of a collective subject - a document, policy, project, or other composite digital object - while the operation of changing the information object is implemented according to the method of paragraph 86.

9. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that in the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1, for each of the proposed decision options, an individual record is maintained - a decision option account - to which, when the subjects submit contributions to the procedure, the values ​​calculated as functions of the merit values ​​spent by the subjects or the values ​​of the non-expendable historical register P1 applied by them as a weight are credited; the outcome of the procedure is determined by the account values ​​of the decision options in accordance with the rules of the procedure, including: the winner is the option with the highest account value; the distribution of the resource between several accepted options occurs proportionally to the values ​​of their accounts; other rules stipulated by the parameters of the procedure.

10. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that in the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1, the strength of the contribution of a subject may be determined by the value of the non-expendable historical register P1 of this subject, applied as the contribution weight, while the value of P1 is not changed by the said operation; if necessary, the subject selects the share of the value of P1, applied as the contribution weight in a specific procedure, from a range from zero to the full value of P1 of the subject at the time of submitting the contribution.

11. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that in the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1, for a specific subject participating in the procedure, a weighting coefficient of its contribution may be applied, determined by a function of the volume of the resource contributed by this subject to the subsystem for accounting of information on the resources of the collective subject in accordance with paragraph 53 and associated with the subject of the said collective decision procedure; the rule of the said dependence is adopted by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the collective subject or is adopted by a subject authorized by the collective subject, acting within the parameters established by the collective decision procedure; in this case, the numerical value of the merit score of the said subject is not changed by the application of the said weighting coefficient.

12. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that a parametric distribution contract is registered for the object of assessment, which contract simultaneously contains static grounds for distribution - including a pre-agreed share of the founding entity of the object and an agreed contribution - and a dynamic component determined by the merits awarded to entities for impact events associated with the given object; the parameters of the static grounds are fixed at the time of registration of the object, and the final distribution is calculated by the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1 as a function of the static grounds and the dynamic component, wherein the registration of the parametric contract and the distribution operations under it are carried out, among other things, by means of a smart contract executed in a distributed ledger.

13. The method according to paragraph 12, characterized in that the dynamic component of the distribution is recorded by a snapshot at the moment of the occurrence of a predetermined event in the life cycle of the object - the completion of the assessment procedure or the closure of the object - taking into account the merits awarded for impact events associated with the object at the specified moment, and the composition of the shares determined by such a snapshot is not recalculated during subsequent operations on the object.

14. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that in the case where a participant in the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1 is a collective subject, the formation of the expression of will of the collective subject in the said procedure is carried out in one of the following modes: delegation mode; distributed decision mode; hybrid mode, including a procedure for a collective decision of the participants of this subject and a subsequent act of approval or execution by an authorized subject; any configuration including one or more of the said modes in their combination; the list of the said modes is open.

15. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the application of the rules of the collective decision subsystem of the system may be carried out by a software agent implemented in the form of a software module for automated data processing, included in the system or interacting with it, operating within the parameters established by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the collective entity or accepted by the participants upon joining the collective entity; the parameters for the application of the software agent may be revised by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the collective entity.

16. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that with respect to the merits spent by the subjects in the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1 in favor of the rejected or losing option, applicant or candidate, one of the rules of the open class system is applied, which, in particular, include: the spent merits remain written off from the accounts of those who spent them and are not returned to the system; the spent merits are transferred to the account of the merits of the subjects listed as a party to the accepted option or the winner of the procedure; the spent merits are returned to the accounts of the subjects who spent them in full or in part in accordance with the rule of the system; a combination of the specified rules or another rule specified by the parameters of the system.

17. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the assets registered in the subsystem for accounting for information on the resources of a collective entity in accordance with paragraph 53 may be taken into account in the rules of the collective decision procedure according to paragraph 1 only in such forms and to such an extent that the outcome of the said procedure is not determined by the said assets in the absence or with a negligible value of the contributions of the merits of the entities to the said procedure; specific rules for accounting for the said assets in the procedures of the system are adopted by the procedure of the collective decision of the participants of the collective entity or are adopted by the participants upon joining the collective entity and are applied only to the extent established by the said procedure.

18. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the emission of merits on the account of the subject’s merits for subsequent use in collective decision procedures according to the present method is carried out by the emission subsystem of the system from open-class sources: - (a) aggregation of the evaluative responses of other subjects in relation to impact events in which the given subject is an actor, in accordance with criteria (2)-(3) of paragraph 25; - (b) automatic assessment of the subject’s actions by the rules of the system, including the rules of a computer game, the rules of a social platform (including social networks, instant messengers, forums, marketplaces, media platforms), the rules of an organization, the rules of an educational platform; - (c) evaluation of the verifier, including the expert verifier, the artificial intelligence agent verifier, the software module verifier; - (d) accrual by an authorized entity, including the administration of a collective entity, an expert, a committee, based on the results of a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit in accordance with this method; - (d) the system takes into account the results of the impact assessment of the subject from external sources, which, in particular, include: internationally recognized indicators of social and environmental impact, including units under the Kyoto Protocol and its subsequent revisions, ESG rating indicators; decisions of other collective subjects of any level - public organizations, professional associations, government agencies; data from integrated external systems; - (e) another emission source adopted by the collective decision procedure of the participants in the assessment circuit; The applicability of the method according to paragraph 1 does not depend on which source from the specified open class or combination of sources issued the credits to the subject's account; the essential requirement is the presence of credits in the subject's account at the time of the use operation in the collective decision procedure according to this method.

19. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the class of grounds for operations to increase the numerical value of the subject's merit account is limited to grounds that include, in particular: the issue of merits based on the results of the reduction of assessment responses in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25; the transfer of merits under operations to use merits by other subjects directed at the given subject or at the assessment object associated with it; the accrual of merits based on the results of the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit; other grounds established by the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit, and does not include as an independent ground the receipt of monetary funds, property rights, tangible or intangible assets from any subject; the form of implementation and the name of the functional class of accounting units within which the said restriction is implemented do not affect the applicability of this invariant.

20. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the subject of the collective decision procedure is one or more attributes of a machine learning model, including a large language model (LLM), a generative model, a classification model, or another machine learning model, which, in particular, include: the composition and principles of training data selection; training goals and metrics; rules and values ​​of model behavior; constraints on the model's output data; a normative document (constitution) specifying the rules of model behavior; a set of behavior instructions (system prompt); a request interpretation policy; parameters of training, retraining, and fine-tuning procedures; other attributes of the model that determine its behavior; the list of said attributes is open; a change in said attributes by the automated system is performed based on the results of the said collective decision procedure;Moreover, the collective entity carrying out the said procedure may be an association of persons of any scope and composition from the open list of types of collective entity according to the preamble of paragraph 1 - including a broad public association; a narrow expert or professional community; a corporation, organization, government agency, educational institution, non-profit association; other formal or informal association of persons.

21. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the social system is a collective entity from among: an organization, corporation, state body or institution, political party, public association, or other formal or informal association of persons; the subject of the collective decision procedure is, in particular: distribution of a common fund - bonus, premium, grant; substitution of elective roles and positions; adoption of normative documents, regulations and policies; adoption of rules, norms and parameters of the system; adoption, change or cancellation of the status of a subject in a collective entity; other subjects in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 1; the list of types of the specified social systems and subjects of the collective decision procedure is open.

22. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the social system is an educational institution or an educational platform uniting students, teachers, and other participants; the number of collective decision procedures and operations for using merits includes, in particular: distribution of access to courses, equipment, and other educational resources in accordance with the clause dependent on paragraph 77; assessment of students' work by collapsing the evaluative responses of other participants in accordance with paragraph 25; formation of ratings, recommendations, and certifications as a consequence of the collective decision procedure; distribution of bonuses, scholarships, and grants; the number of sources of issuing merits to the participant's account includes, in particular, automatic assessment of the participant's actions by the rules of the educational platform in accordance with the clause on the open class of emission sources dependent on paragraph 1; the list of the specified procedures and emission sources is open.

23. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the social system is a startup or other project uniting founders, participants, co-executors, contributors; the subject of the collective decision procedure is the distribution of shares in the project, stocks, options, rights to the project result, financing funds between the said entities; the distribution of the said shares is carried out in the manner established by the parametric distribution contract, which may include, in an open combination: static distribution bases - a pre-agreed share of the founder and / or an agreed contribution; and / or a dynamic component determined by the merits awarded to entities for impact events associated with the project; in a particular case, the distribution of shares is determined by the dynamic component in accordance with this method; a snapshot of the composition of shares is recorded at the time of the occurrence of a pre-specified event in the project life cycle.

24. The method according to paragraph 1, characterized in that the social system is a non-profit association, charitable foundation, social movement, initiative group or other association of persons carrying out socially significant activities; the subject of the collective decision procedure is, in particular: distribution of donations and other attracted resources between beneficiaries, projects, programs; making decisions on supporting the initiatives of participants; formation and updating of the policy of the collective entity’s activities; the number of sources of emission of merits on the participant’s account includes, in particular, taking into account the results of the impact assessment of the entity from external sources - internationally recognized indicators of social and environmental impact, including units under the Kyoto Protocol and its subsequent revisions, ESG ratings indicators; decisions of other collective entities; data from integrated external systems - in accordance with the clause on the open class of emission sources dependent on paragraph 1.

25. A method for automated measurement (confirmation) of the impact (Proof-of-Impact, hereinafter referred to as PoI) of a subject on a social system, implemented by an automated computer system containing data storage facilities and data processing facilities, where the subject is an individual or a collective subject - an association of persons regardless of the status of a legal entity, the form of organizational and legal consolidation and formalization, including an organization, community, cooperative, association, corporation, foundation, public association, professional network, initiative group, movement, other formal or informal association of persons, - or an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, or another machine learning model;wherein the system maintains for each subject an individual record - the subject's merit account - storing the numerical values ​​of the units of social impact assessment (hereinafter referred to as merit; also synonymous with: merit, points, tokens, credits, units of recognition or otherwise; in English texts merit, points, tokens, credits; Latin meritum), representing a quantitative expression of the subject's right to participate in a collective decision in the system; and also maintains for impact events - objects of assessment - individual records - accounts of objects of assessment; this method does not create legally binding obligations for subjects of the system and other persons with respect to the disposal of any tangible assets, property rights or intangible assets, and the actual disposal of any assets based on the results of the system's procedures is carried out by subjects outside this system; the applicability of this method is retained regardless of the name of the specified accounting units;the merit account of a subject is implemented by a single entry or a set of related entries, which implement the functions of merit, including: the function of making a contribution to the procedure of a collective decision by spending from the account; the function of submitting evaluative responses to impact events of other subjects; the form of implementation of these functions (a single entry with rules for distinguishing operations; a set of related entries with the distribution of functions between them; separate account registers; marking of accounting units; separate entry fields; another form) and the name of the entries do not affect the applicability of this method; including: - registration in the system of data on actions performed by subjects in the form of records of impact events, for each of which the system records one or more subjects listed as actors of this impact event, and the subject registering the event may not coincide with the actor; - the reception and storage in the system of evaluative responses from subjects to registered impact events, whereby the number of subjects submitting responses includes subjects other than the actors of the impact event, and each evaluative response is characterized simultaneously by a sign - positive, negative, or neutral - and a numerical value established by the subject submitting the response at the time of submitting the response; the submission of a response is accompanied by the operation of using merits from the account of the subject submitting the response in an amount equal to the established numerical value of the response; - execution by the evaluation subsystem of operations to change the numerical value of the merit accounts of subjects based on the specified evaluation responses; - the expenditure by the subject of merits from his merit account when performing system operations, including expenditure as a contribution to the collective decision procedure, as well as the expenditure of other types provided for by the rules of the system, characterized in that: (1) the operation of using merits by a subject - including a contribution to a collective decision procedure, the submission of an assessment response, spending on the promotion of the object of assessment, spending as gratuitous recognition and other use operations stipulated by the rules of the system - is carried out by a subsystem of the system in such a way that the total amount of merits used by the subject within the limits of one collective decision procedure or another interval for recording the use determined by the rules of the system does not exceed the current value of the merit account of this subject at the time of the operation; in order to ensure the specified limitation, during the use operation, the system registers in the data storage means a system record of the amount used, implemented in one of the open class forms: - (a) by reducing the numerical value of the subject’s merit score by the amount used; - (b) recording the amount used in a separate system record of the use transaction without changing the numerical value of the account; - (c) temporary binding of the used amount of merit for the period of the interval of accounting for use; - (d) another operation of the system that ensures that the amount used is taken into account when determining the amount available for subsequent use operations in the same accounting interval; the form of implementation of the specified system record and its name do not affect the applicability of this method; other operations for changing the numerical value of the subject's merit account are performed by the subsystems of the system, including the evaluation subsystem in accordance with feature (2) of this paragraph, operations for transferring merits for the expenditure of merits by other subjects, directed at this subject or at the assessment object associated with it, and other operations provided for by the rules of the system; (2) the system measures the impact of an impact event by means of an evaluation subsystem that calculates the estimated value of the impact as the value of the sign function of the convolution of the evaluation responses, the arguments of which include the evaluation responses of subjects other than the actors of the impact event, taking into account both the signs and the numerical values ​​of these responses; the calculated value is a function of the values ​​and numerical values ​​of the responses and may be positive, negative, or zero; the calculated value is recorded in the system as the result of measuring the impact of the impact event and is attributed to the subjects listed as actors of this impact event; in the particular case of a positive calculated value, this operation represents the emission of merits - the emergence of new merits in the system; (3) a change in the records of the system state and / or its organizational structure stored in the system’s data storage facilities occurs as a consequence of a collective decision procedure in which subjects contribute merits by spending from their merit accounts, This ensures the machine-verifiable integrity and auditability of the numerical merit accounts of subjects; the impossibility of changing the numerical value of the account except through operations of the system's subsystems according to the prescribed rules; a constitutive dependence of the calculated assessment value on the aggregation of the assessment responses of subjects; protection against falsification of the assessment value record by including in the arguments of the aggregation the assessment responses of subjects other than the actors; linking the weight of each response in the aggregation to the actual operation of using the merits from the account of the subject submitting the response as a quantitative measure of the evaluator's involvement in forming the assessment; dependence of changes in stored records of the state of the system on the procedure of collective decision-making involving merits.

26. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the system maintains an individual record for the impact event - the account of the object of assessment - and the amount of emission calculated by the assessment subsystem in accordance with criterion (2) is first credited to the account of the object of assessment linked to the given impact event, after which it is fully or partially transferred from the account of the object of assessment to the accounts of the merits of the entities listed as actors of this impact event, according to a predetermined rule of the system; the account of the object of assessment serves as a registered node of the emission audit, recording the calculated amount before it is transferred to the accounts of the actors.

27. The method according to paragraph 26, characterized in that for an impact event having a structure that includes a set of separately registered elements - parts, blocks or other descriptive units of recording about the impact event - the account of the assessment object is maintained for the impact event as a whole and / or for its individual elements, and for different elements separate accounts of the assessment object may be maintained, to each of which the system credits the value calculated in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25 according to the rules specified by the parameters of the system.

28. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the functional delineation of the functions of merit according to the preamble of paragraph 25 is implemented in the form of a multitude of separate registers of merits of different semantics, maintained by the system for each subject, including: - a non-expendable historical register of a subject (P1), accumulating the merits of a subject and forming the accumulative (reputational) component of the social capital of a subject, and the value of P1 is not reduced by either the operation of spending merits or any other operation of the system and changes only in the direction of increase - simultaneously with the accrual of merits to a subject in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25; - the subject’s expenditure account (P2), corresponding to the subject’s merit account according to paragraph 25 and decreasing upon spending, whereby the subject’s spending of merits reduces only P2 and does not affect the value of P1; - a periodic non-cumulative register of a subject - a quota (P3), replenished by the system automatically up to the maximum value with the onset of each new period, and the unspent balance of the quota of the previous period is reset to zero and is not carried over to the new period, and the basis for calculating the quota is the registered fact of membership of the subject or his belonging to a group; - the register of the valuation object (P4), which is the account of the valuation object according to clause 26 and contains a pair of values ​​- the current indicator and the cumulative accumulated indicator of the object; - register of a collective entity (P5) - an account of merits maintained for a collective entity.

29. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that in the procedure of a collective decision according to the criterion (3) of paragraph 25, the strength of the contribution of a subject may be determined by the value of the non-expendable historical register P1 of this subject, applied as the contribution weight, while the value of P1 is not changed by the said operation; if necessary, the subject selects the share of the value of P1 applied as the contribution weight in a specific procedure, from the range from zero to the full value of P1 of the subject at the time of submitting the contribution.

30. The method according to paragraph 28, characterized in that during the operation of spending merits, the write-off source - a specific register from among P1-P5 - is selected in a cascade manner depending on the type of operation, the sign and direction of the assessment and the role of the subject in the operation, in accordance with a predetermined rule of write-off order, in which, in particular: - when a positive assessment response is submitted in the collective decision procedure, the write-off is first made from the periodic quota register P3, and when the quota is exhausted, from the expense account P2; - when submitting a negative evaluation response, including a targeted one, the write-off is made from the subject’s expense account P2, and in another implementation option - from the periodic quota register P3 or another register of the subject’s merits; - when spending merits on the assessment or promotion of an object, the actor of which is the spending subject himself, as well as when spending in the pairwise comparison mode, the write-off is made from the expense account P2 and is accompanied by a mandatory substantive commentary; - when spending merits as gratuitous recognition (gratitude), the write-off is made from expense account P2; Moreover, the list of types of operations and the corresponding write-off sources is open and can be supplemented with other types of operations while maintaining the principle of cascading source selection.

31. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the record of the impact event has a multidimensional structure in which the following are separately recorded: one or more subjects-actors; the fact itself - a description of the action performed; the addressee or the sphere of impact - from a specific subject to an indefinitely wide circle of persons, wherein the addressee is not the source of the event assessment; a value framework - the assignment of the event to one or more values ​​from a replenished classifier; and the thematic area of ​​the event from a classifier of thematic areas maintained separately from the value classifier; wherein the supporting descriptive elements of the record are the subject-actor and the fact itself, and the addressee or the sphere of impact, the value framework and the thematic area are descriptive clarifications of the event.

32. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that in the case where the actor of the impact event is a collective subject, the formation of the expression of the will of the collective subject in the operations of the system is carried out in one of the modes: - a delegation regime in which the expression of the will of a collective subject is formed by a subject authorized by it, to whom the relevant right has been delegated; - a distributed decision mode, in which the expression of the will of a collective subject is formed by the procedure of collective decision of the participants of this subject through the expenditure of their merits in accordance with criterion (3) of paragraph 25; - a hybrid regime in which the expression of the will of a collective subject is formed both by the procedure of collective decision of the participants of this subject through the expenditure of their merits, and by the subsequent act of approval or execution by an authorized subject acting within the parameters established by the said procedure of collective decision; - any configuration that includes one or more of the specified modes in their combination; Moreover, the list of specified modes is open.

33. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that it provides for an operation of spending by a subject of merits from his expense account as gratuitous recognition (gratitude) to another subject, in which the spent merits are reduced from the account of the spending subject in accordance with feature (1) of paragraph 25, do not generate new merits in the system and are not subject to feature (2) of paragraph 25; the said operation is an expenditure, not an emission.

34. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the operation of spending merits by the subject on the promotion of the object of assessment is provided, including the object of which the spending subject itself is an actor, and wherein the spending changes the order of presentation of the objects of assessment to other subjects of the system; the merits spent on promotion are reduced from the account of the spending subject in accordance with the criterion (1) of paragraph 25 and do not generate new merits, and the direction of spending on one's own object is not prohibited by the criterion (2) of paragraph 25.

35. The method according to paragraph 34, characterized in that the expenditure of merits for the inclusion of the object of assessment in the assessment procedure may be carried out jointly by several subjects - contributors of units - each of whom spends merits from his account in the general contribution for the given object; the amount awarded based on the results of the subsequent assessment is distributed among the said subjects as a function of the sizes of their contributions, and the said distribution occurs as a consequence of the assessment procedure by other subjects, and not as a direct return of the expended merits to those who spent them.

36. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that a parametric distribution contract is registered for the object of valuation, which may include, in an open combination: static distribution grounds - including a pre-agreed share of the founding entity of the object and an agreed contribution; and / or a dynamic component determined by the merits awarded to entities for impact events related to the given object; in a particular case, the distribution of shares is determined by the dynamic component; the parameters of the static grounds are fixed at the time of registration of the object, and the final distribution is calculated by the collective decision procedure according to feature (3) of paragraph 25 as a function of the static grounds and the dynamic component, wherein the registration of the parametric contract and the distribution operations under it are performed, among other things, by means of a smart contract executed in a distributed ledger.

37. The method according to paragraph 36, characterized in that the dynamic component of the distribution is recorded by a snapshot at the moment of the occurrence of a predetermined event in the life cycle of the object - the completion of the assessment procedure or the closure of the object - taking into account the merits awarded for impact events associated with the object at the specified moment, and the composition of the shares determined by such a snapshot is not recalculated during subsequent operations on the object.

38. The method according to paragraph 26, characterized in that the order of presenting the objects of assessment to the subject is determined by the amount of merit accumulated in the account of each object of assessment, and a separate ranking algorithm based on characteristics other than the specified amount is not applied by the system, and the filtering of the presented objects is limited by the parameters specified by the subject himself.

39. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that a composition of at least two independent anti-fraud verification validator factors is successively applied to the assessment responses received for the reduction of the feature (2) of paragraph 25, according to the results of which the contribution of an individual assessment response to the reduction is reduced or the response is excluded from the reduction, wherein the number of said validator factors includes, in particular: a coalition assessment detection factor, which reduces the contribution of the responses of a group of subjects systematically jointly assessing the same impact events or the same actors; and a factor of the assessor's reliability history, which reduces the contribution of the subject's responses depending on the proportion of its past responses not supported by the subsequent aggregated assessment; the list of validator factors is open.

40. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the convolution of responses in the feature (2) of paragraph 25 includes multiplying each response by the weighting coefficient of the evaluating subject, wherein the weighting coefficient takes values ​​from a predetermined range and is different from unity for at least one part of the subjects.

41. The method according to paragraph 40, characterized in that the weighting coefficient of the assessing subject is calculated as a functional convolution of at least three semantically heterogeneous components, including: a component of the formal status of the subject in the community, a component of the accumulated evaluative capital of the subject, and a component of the conformity of the area of ​​the assessed impact event with the subject’s specialized area; wherein each of the said components is controlled by a separate convolution parameter.

42. The method according to paragraph 41, characterized in that the component of the correspondence of the area of ​​the assessed impact event to the subject’s specialized area is determined on the basis of at least two independent sources of data on the subject’s specialized area, including: the subject’s membership in at least one specialized community of the corresponding area and the history of the subject’s evaluative interactions with impact events of the specified area.

43. The method according to paragraph 41, characterized in that the weighting coefficient calculated for the subject according to paragraph 41 is applied when performing at least two different evaluation operations in the system, including the operations of impact event evaluation specified in feature (2) of paragraph 25 and the collective decision operation associated with the link of feature (3) of paragraph 25.

44. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the subject of the evaluation contour, which is a collective subject, is simultaneously a subject of the evaluation contour of a higher level; in this case, the merits are transferred between levels by means of conversion, during which an increase in the value of the merits that form the share of participation of the said collective subject at a higher level is accompanied by a decrease or linking of the corresponding value of the merits at a lower level so that the total value of the right of collective decision, expressed in merits, is preserved upon conversion.

45. The method according to paragraph 44, characterized in that the share of participation of a collective entity at a higher level arises and changes only in the presence of a combination of two acts: an act of a lower collective entity, consisting of spending or tying up merits on account of participation, and a counter act of a higher level on acceptance of the said participation; upon revocation of any of the said acts, the share of participation returns to the default value.

46. ​​The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the parameters of the evaluation subsystem of each level, including the rules for issuing merits, the rules for periodically changing the values ​​of registers and the inter-level conversion rate, are established by the evaluation subsystem of the same level, and the evaluation subsystem of the higher level does not change the parameters of the lower level, and the evaluation subsystem of the lower level does not change the parameters of the higher level.

47. The method according to paragraph 44, characterized in that the inter-level conversion rate in each conversion is the result of a calculation based on the current state of the level - the value of the function of the ratio of the amount of merit accumulated at the level to the amount of their emission at this level - and not an input parameter of the conversion.

48. The method according to paragraph 45, characterized in that the merits issued in one evaluation circuit are recognized by the right of collective decision in another evaluation circuit only in the presence of the counter act of the receiving circuit specified in paragraph 45, and each evaluation circuit maintains its own autonomous register of merits.

49. The method according to paragraph 26, characterized in that upon cancellation of a previously registered impact event - in particular, upon establishing the unreliability of a fact or cancellation of the event registration - an operation of cancellation of a previously produced issue of merits for this event is performed (reversal of the issue); upon reversal of the issue, the amount of merits previously credited for this event is written off from the accounts of the subject-actors and from the account of the object of assessment within the limits of the amount actually credited previously, and the specific rule for applying the reversal to the credited, unspent and / or spent parts of the credited amount is determined by the parameters of the system's reversal procedure.

50. The method according to paragraph 49, characterized in that the procedure for reversing the issue includes the return of previously spent merits by the subject-actors, issued for the cancelled event: the reduction of the numerical value of the merit account of the subject-actor is carried out within the limits of the amount previously issued for this event, regardless of whether the said amount has been spent by the time of reversal; if the current numerical value of the account is insufficient for the reduction by the said amount, then the corresponding difference is recorded by the system as a negative account balance, which is repaid by subsequent operations of increasing the numerical value of the account of this subject.

51. The method according to paragraph 49, characterized in that the registration of an impact event is accompanied by the operation of confirming the event by a verifier subject, wherein the verifier subject is one of the types of the open class, which include, in particular: an individual; a collective subject; a software module for automated data processing that is part of the system or interacts with it, operating within the parameters established by the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the corresponding assessment circuit; an artificial intelligence agent trained on system data and operating within the specified parameters; another subject assigned by the rules of the system the function of guaranteeing the reliability of the impact event; the list of the specified types of verifier subjects is open;When an impact event previously confirmed by a verifier is cancelled - if the system maintains a merit score for the specified verifier - the system shall perform the following operations with respect to the merit score of the verifier subject: decreasing the numerical value of the score by an amount equal to the merit score previously issued for the event being cancelled; decreasing the numerical value of the score by the penalty amount specified by the system parameters; when the number of cancellations of events previously confirmed by the specified verifier occurs, as predetermined by the system parameters, the operation of resetting the merit score of the specified verifier and / or terminating its performance as a verifier is performed; when events that have not been subsequently cancelled are confirmed, the verifier receives a reward in the form of a merit score issued to its account in accordance with the rules of the system.

52. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that with respect to the merits spent by the subjects in the collective decision procedure according to criterion (3) of paragraph 25 in favor of the rejected or losing option, applicant or candidate, one of the rules of the open class system is applied, which, in particular, include: the spent merits remain written off from the accounts of those who spent them and are not returned to the system; the spent merits are transferred to the account of the merits of the subjects listed as a party to the accepted option or the winner of the procedure; the spent merits are returned to the accounts of the subjects who spent them in full or in part in accordance with the rule of the system; a combination of the specified rules or another rule specified by the parameters of the system.

53. The method according to clause 25, characterized in that the system contains a subsystem for accounting for information on the resources of a collective entity (hereinafter referred to as subsystem B), maintaining records of resources with the recording for each record of: the type of asset from an open class, which includes, in particular, monetary funds, property rights, tangible assets, intangible assets, man-hours of labor, connections, relations and accesses of the entity that are significant for the community - including client bases and counterparty bases, contacts with investors, partners and other third parties, access to audiences in social networks, media and offline communities, - other types of assets; the source of receipt; the time of receipt or registration; the entity listed as the source of receipt; the purpose of receipt - to a common resource of the community, to a fund, to a project, to a parametric distribution contract, other purpose;Moreover, the registration of information in subsystem B is carried out through open-class channels, which include: automatic registration upon receipt of an asset in the internal storage of the system; registration by an authorized community subject based on information received by the system through external interfaces; registration by a software agent operating within the parameters established by the procedure of the collective decision of the community; registration by a community member upon joining or in other cases stipulated by the rules of the system.

54. The method according to paragraph 53, characterized in that the distribution of resources registered in subsystem B between recipients - including subjects of the system and third parties, including beneficiaries of charitable programs, authors and participants of projects supported by a collective subject, and other recipients according to the rules of the system - is carried out as a consequence of the procedure of a collective decision of the system in accordance with feature (3) of paragraph 25, and the relationship between the volumes of merits spent in the procedure and the volumes of the distributed resource in each procedure is calculated by the system dynamically based on the current state of the system and is not a conversion rate constant predetermined by the system.

55. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the fact of the contribution of resources by a subject to the subsystem for accounting of information on community resources may be an impact event according to the criterion (2) of paragraph 25, to which other subjects of the system submit evaluation responses, based on the results of the reduction of which an issue of merits is made to the account of the said subject in accordance with the criterion (2) of paragraph 25; in this case, the increase in the value of the merit account of the said subject is carried out based on the result of the evaluation by other subjects, and not on the basis of the fact of the contribution of resources as such.

56. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that in the procedure of collective decision of the system, in accordance with the feature (3) of paragraph 25, for each of the proposed decision options, an individual record is kept - a decision option account - to which, when the subjects submit contributions to the procedure, the values ​​calculated as functions of the merit values ​​spent by the subjects or the values ​​of the non-expendable historical register P1 applied by them as a weight are credited; the outcome of the collective decision procedure is determined by the account values ​​of the decision options in accordance with the rules of the procedure, including: the winner is the option with the highest account value; the distribution of the resource between several accepted options occurs proportionally to the values ​​of their accounts; other rules stipulated by the parameters of the procedure.

57. The method according to paragraph 56, characterized in that the amount credited to the account of the decision option for the operation of the subject's contribution to the collective decision procedure may be determined as a function of the amount of merit spent by the subject and a parameter reflecting the volume of the resource contributed by this subject to the subsystem for accounting for information on the resources of the collective subject; the rule of the said dependence is accepted by the procedure of the collective decision of the participants of the collective subject and is applied only in the volume established by the said procedure; in this case, the value of the merit account of this subject is not changed by the said operation.

58. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the application of the rules of the evaluation subsystem and / or the collective decision subsystem of the system can be carried out by a software agent implemented in the form of a software module for automated data processing, included in the system or interacting with it, operating within the parameters established by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the collective entity or accepted by the participants upon joining the collective entity, and the parameters for the application of the software agent can be revised by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the collective entity with a subsequent change in the rules by which the agent applies the said rules.

59. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the operating parameters of the evaluation subsystem according to feature (2) of paragraph 25, the parameters for calculating merits for system actions, the parameters for applying the weighting coefficients of the evaluating entities in the convolution of evaluation responses, the parameters of the collective decision procedure according to feature (3) of paragraph 25, as well as other parameters of the rules of the system of the corresponding evaluation circuit are established, changed, or cancelled by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the said evaluation circuit according to feature (3) of paragraph 25.

60. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the numerical value of the subject's merit account is changed only by the system's subsystems according to the operations provided for by the system's rules; the system does not provide an interface for directly recording the numerical value of the merit account.

61. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the assets registered in the subsystem for accounting of information on community resources in accordance with paragraph 53 may be taken into account in the rules of the system's procedures only in such forms and to such an extent that the outcome of the system's collective decision procedure in accordance with criterion (3) of paragraph 25 is not determined by the said assets in the absence of, or with a negligible value of, the contributions of the subjects' merits to the said procedure; specific rules for accounting for the said assets in the procedures of the system are adopted by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the collective subject or are adopted by the participants upon joining the collective subject and are applied only to the extent established by the said procedure.

62. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the social capital accounting subsystem of the system maintains two functionally different registers of units of assessment of the social impact of the subject in the data storage means: - register of potential social capital - records of the system on the aggregated historical result of accounting for the impact events of the subject, which include, in particular: the result of the reduction of the evaluative responses of others in accordance with attribute (2) of paragraph 25; the results of the assessment of the impact of the subject taken into account by the system from external sources, including internationally recognized indicators of social and environmental impact, decisions of other collective subjects, other sources adopted by the procedure of collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit; other accounting operations provided for by the rules of the system, - wherein the value of the said register is not reduced during operations of using the merits of the subject; the value of the said register is used by the system, among other things, as the weight of the evaluative responses submitted by the subject in the procedures in accordance with paragraph 1 of this formula; - register of active social capital (merit account according to the preamble of paragraph 25) - records of the system on the current value of the subject’s merits, available for use in collective decision procedures and other use operations; reduced or taken into account by another system record in accordance with the open class of forms according to feature (1) of paragraph 25; The form of implementation of the two specified registers - as separate records or as linked fields of a single record - does not affect the applicability of this method.

63. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the system implements the quantitative calculation of the social capital of the subject in the form of two registers in accordance with paragraph 62 of this formula; the calculation is performed by a subsystem of the system from open-class sources, which include, in particular: - (a) aggregation of the evaluative responses of other entities in relation to impact events in which the given entity is an actor, in accordance with criterion (2) of this paragraph; - (b) accumulation in the register of potential social capital of the results of recording the impact events of the subject in accordance with paragraph 62; - (c) the system takes into account the results of the impact assessment of the subject from external sources, including internationally recognized indicators of social and environmental impact, decisions of other collective subjects, data from integrated external systems in accordance with the clause on the open class of emission sources dependent on paragraph 1; - (d) a combination of the specified sources or another source adopted by the collective decision procedure of the participants in the assessment circuit; in this case, the result of the work of the said subsystem is the quantitatively calculated social capital of the subject in the form of the values ​​of two registers in accordance with paragraph 62, used by the system in further collective decision operations in accordance with the method in paragraph 1.

64. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the class of grounds for operations to increase the numerical value of the subject's merit account is limited to grounds that include, in particular: the issue of merits based on the results of the reduction of assessment responses in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25; the transfer of merits under operations to use merits by other subjects directed at the given subject or at the assessment object associated with it; the accrual of merits based on the results of the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit; other grounds established by the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit, and does not include as an independent ground the receipt of monetary funds, property rights, tangible or intangible assets from any subject; the form of implementation and the name of the functional class of accounting units within which the said restriction is implemented do not affect the applicability of this invariant.

65. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that when a negative assessment response is submitted, the source for writing off the numerical value of the response is the expense account of the entity submitting the response, and no write-off is made from the periodic quota register when a negative response is submitted.

66. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the negative part of the calculated value is attributed to the account of the object of assessment and is not transferred to the accounts of the subjects-actors.

67. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the value of the object’s account is reduced by the negative part of the calculated value up to a predetermined limit value, upon reaching which further reduction ceases.

68. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the event is presented to the assessing subjects without identifying the actor, which ensures an assessment of the very fact of impact regardless of the identity of the actor.

69. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the impact event is assessed in one or more modes selected from the open class: randomized pairwise comparison of pairs of events; assessment from the quota of a periodic non-cumulative register; assessment from the expense account of merits at the project site; a combination of the specified modes or another mode.

70. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the weight of the subject's evaluative response in the convolution according to feature (3) of paragraph 25 or the value of the assessment calculated in accordance with feature (3) of paragraph 25 are indexed by a coefficient determined by a function of the volume of the resource contributed by this subject to the subsystem for accounting for information on the resources of the collective subject in accordance with paragraph 53 and associated with the subject of the assessment; the rule of the said dependence is adopted by the procedure of a collective decision of the participants of the collective subject or is adopted by a subject authorized by the collective subject, acting within the parameters established by the procedure of a collective decision; in this case, the numerical value of the merit score of the said subject does not change by the application of the said coefficient.

71. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the choice by the responding entity of the source for writing off the numerical value of the response is made from an open class of combinations, which in particular include: positive responses are written off from the periodic quota register; positive responses are written off from the periodic quota register, and negative responses are written off from the expense account; positive and negative responses are written off from the periodic quota register; positive and negative responses are written off from the expense account; a combination of the specified combinations or other combinations.

72. The method according to paragraph 31, characterized in that the correspondence between the value and the type of action is established by one of an open class of methods: emergently based on the evaluative responses of community subjects; based on a predetermined list of types of actions; by a combination of the specified methods, or otherwise.

73. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the recording of the value calculated according to paragraph 25 in the system is carried out by transferring to the account of merits of the subjects-actors of the impact event the merits spent by other subjects in favor of this impact event or its actors in the system, wherein the value transferred to the account of the actors corresponds to the function of the volumes of the said expenditures in accordance with the rule of the system.

74. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the impact event assessment procedure is implemented as a binary “accept / reject” procedure in relation to the fact of impact itself or to its recognition as positive, in which positive and negative responses of subjects are taken into account jointly, and the value calculated according to paragraph 25 is determined as a function of the difference between the volumes of responses in favor and the volumes of responses against; the result of the procedure is one of two outcomes in accordance with the rules of the system.

75. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the registration of an impact event by a subject that is not the actor of the event is accompanied by the mandatory expenditure of merits from the expense account of the said registrar subject in the amount specified by the parameters of the system; said expenditure is a condition for the registration of the event.

76. The method according to paragraph 25, characterized in that the impact assessment value calculated according to the present method is used by the system as a reward signal for the procedure of training and / or retraining of a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, or another machine learning model; the number of training procedures in which the said value is used includes, in particular, the procedure of learning with reinforcement based on feedback (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, RLHF), the procedure of supervised fine-tuning, and other training and / or retraining procedures; the weight of the evaluator-subject's evaluator's evaluative response entering the convolution according to the present method can be determined by the value of the potential social capital register of the said evaluator in accordance with a value dependent on paragraph25 point on double register; resistance to abuse by assessors is ensured by recursive evaluation of their responses in accordance with the method in point 81 of this formula.

77. A method for automated management of the actions of subjects in a social system using units of social impact assessment (hereinafter referred to as merit; synonymous designations of accounting units and the applicability of the method regardless of the name of the said accounting units - in accordance with the preamble to paragraph 1), implemented by an automated computer system containing data storage means and data processing means, wherein the subject is an individual, or a collective subject in accordance with the preamble to paragraph 1, or an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, or another machine learning model; wherein the system contains a social capital accounting subsystem that maintains individual merit accounts for subjects in accordance with the preamble to paragraph1, and a subsystem for registering, in data storage facilities, records of objects and / or statuses of the social system associated with subjects of the system or with the social system as a whole; wherein the account of the merits of a subject is implemented by one record or a set of related records in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 1; the form of implementation and the name of the said records do not affect the applicability of this method; this method does not create legally binding obligations for subjects of the system and other persons with respect to the disposal of any tangible assets, property rights or intangible assets, and the actual disposal of any assets as a result of the procedures of the system is carried out by subjects outside this system; including:. - reception by the system of commands from subjects to perform actions in relation to specified objects and / or statuses; - execution by the system of specified actions with changes to the records stored in the system’s data storage media, characterized in that: (1) actions of the system that change records stored in the system’s data storage facilities about objects and / or statuses of the social system, which include, in particular: - (a) creative actions: creation of an object in the general space of the system; promotion of the object of assessment in the order of presentation to the assessing subjects; taking up an elective role or position; reservation of a common resource; placement of an information object in the general communication circuit; other actions, the effect of which is expressed in the addition or expansion of objects and / or statuses in the social system; - (b) destructive actions: reduction, limitation or elimination of objects and / or statuses that are not in the exclusive possession of the initiating subject, including limiting the subject’s access to the system’s functions, deleting an information object, removing an object from a common space; - (c) neutral actions with a prioritizing effect: obtaining priority in the service queue; access to a limited shared resource; other actions, the effect of which is expressed in the redistribution of access to shared resources without adding or eliminating them; the list of types of the specified actions is open - they are performed by the system through the operation of using the merits of the subject initiating the action from the merit account of the specified subject; (2) the amount of merit use for each type of action is established, changed or cancelled by a collective decision procedure of the participants of the relevant evaluation circuit in accordance with the method in paragraph 1, or by a subject authorized by the collective subject, acting within the parameters established by the collective decision procedure of the participants of the collective subject or adopted by the participants upon joining the collective subject; the performance of the specified action by the system is carried out when the value of the merit account of the initiating subject is sufficient to cover the established amount; when performing the action, the system registers the use of merit of the specified amount in one of the forms of the open class in accordance with feature (1) of paragraph 25; (3) the increase in the numerical value of the merit account of the initiating entity is carried out by the subsystems of the system according to the operations provided for by the rules of the system, including: the issue of merits based on the results of the reduction of the assessment responses of other entities according to the method according to paragraph 25; other emission sources according to the clause on the open class of emission sources dependent on the method according to paragraph 1; the transfer of merits according to the operations of using merits by other entities directed at the given entity or at the assessment object associated with it; other operations of changing the numerical value of the account provided for by the rules of the system, This ensures a machine-verifiable link between the ability to perform actions that change system-stored records of objects and / or statuses of the social system and the social capital of the initiating subject; self-regulating limitation of the individual load of subjects on public objects and other subjects without centralized moderation.

78. The method according to paragraph 77, characterized in that the social system is a multi-player computer game or a virtual environment uniting individual players and / or autonomous software agents; the number of actions performed by the system in the operation of using merits according to feature (1) of paragraph 77 includes, in particular: creating a game object in the common game space; modifying or eliminating a game object; occupying a game role or position; obtaining priority in the queue for the distribution of a limited game resource; placing an information object in the common game communication circuit; other game actions; the number of collective subjects establishing the parameters of the said actions according to feature (2) of paragraph77, include, in particular: a guild, clan, corporation, faction, player union, or other player association; the list of the specified types of game actions and collective entities is open; at the same time, the source of issuing merits to a player's account may include the automatic evaluation of game actions by the rules of the computer game in accordance with the clause on the open class of emission sources dependent on paragraph 1.

79. The method according to paragraph 77, characterized in that the subject initiating the action is an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, or another model; the restriction of the actions of said agent that change the records stored by the system about objects and / or statuses of the social system is carried out according to the operation of using merits from the merit account of said agent in accordance with this method; a machine-verifiable restriction of the activity of an autonomous software agent in a social system is provided on the basis of social capital controlled by the procedure of a collective decision of the participants of the evaluation circuit.

80. The method according to paragraph 77, characterized in that the class of grounds for operations to increase the numerical value of the subject's merit account is limited to grounds that include, in particular: the issue of merits based on the results of the reduction of assessment responses in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25; the transfer of merits under operations to use merits by other subjects directed at the given subject or at an assessment object associated with it; the accrual of merits based on the results of the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit; other grounds established by the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit, and does not include as an independent ground the receipt of monetary funds, property rights, tangible or intangible assets from any subject; the form of implementation and the name of the functional class of accounting units within which the said restriction is implemented do not affect the applicability of this invariant.

81. A method for automated self-regulation of a social system through a recursive evaluation of evaluative responses, implemented by an automated computer system containing data storage means and data processing means, wherein the subject is an individual, or a collective subject in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 1, or an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, or another machine learning model; wherein the system contains a social capital accounting subsystem that maintains individual merit accounts for subjects in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 1 (synonymous designations of accounting units and the applicability of the method regardless of the name of the said accounting units - in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 1); wherein the subject's merit account is implemented by a single entry or a set of related entries in accordance with the preamble of paragraph1; the form of implementation and the name of the specified records do not affect the applicability of this method; this method does not create legally binding obligations for the subjects of the system and other persons with respect to the disposal of any tangible assets, property rights or intangible assets; including:. - registration in the system of records of impact events, which include, in particular, information objects created by subjects of the system (publications, messages, comments, and other information objects); - receiving evaluative responses to registered impact events from system subjects; - calculation of the impact event assessment value and / or other operations to change the impact event score value in accordance with the rules of the system and recording the calculated value in the system with its association with the impact event and / or with one or more subjects of the system, characterized in that: (1) the evaluative response of the evaluator, submitted to the impact event registered in the system (hereinafter referred to as the original impact event), is registered by the system as an independent impact event (hereinafter referred to as the derived impact event), the actor of which is the evaluator who submitted the said response; (2) the subsystem of the system receives the evaluative responses of other subjects of the system for the derived impact event in accordance with the method of paragraph 25; the system maintains an account for the derived impact event in accordance with the method of paragraph 25; the value of the said account is changed by the subsystems of the system by operations including: emission based on the results of the reduction of the evaluative responses of other subjects in accordance with the method of paragraph 25; other operations of emission and transfer of merits in accordance with the clause on the open class of emission sources dependent on the method of paragraph 1 (including automatic evaluation by the rules of the system, evaluation by the verifier, accounting of the results of evaluation from external sources, accrual by an authorized subject, other sources adopted by the procedure of a collective decision of the participants of the evaluation circuit); moreover, the account of the derived impact event is changed by the operations of the said emission sources in the same way as the account of any other impact event of the system; (3) the subsystem of the system carries out the operation of transferring the calculated value of the account of the derivative impact event - in full or in part according to the rules of the system - to the account of the merits of the subject-assessor listed as the actor of the said derivative impact event; the calculated value may be positive, negative or zero; if the value is positive, the said operation represents the issue of merits to the account of the merits of the said assessor; if the value is negative - a decrease in the numerical value of the account of merits of the said assessor; the said transfer operation is carried out when the account value of the derivative impact event reaches a predetermined threshold value - positive or negative - according to the rules of the system; (4) the specified recursion of impact events and evaluative responses is implemented by the system at an arbitrary number of nesting levels: a derivative impact event of any level of recursion is registered by the system in accordance with feature (1) of this paragraph and is subject to further assessment by evaluative responses of other subjects in accordance with feature (2) of this paragraph; (5) the parameters of the subsystems for registering derivative impact events, calculating the value of the derivative impact event account and transferring the calculated value in accordance with features (1)-(3) of this paragraph, as well as the threshold values ​​of the transfer in accordance with feature (3) of this paragraph - are established, changed or cancelled by the procedure of a collective decision of the participants of the relevant assessment circuit in accordance with the method according to paragraph 1, or by an entity authorized by a collective entity, acting within the parameters established by the procedure of a collective decision of the participants of the collective entity or adopted by the participants upon joining the collective entity, This ensures machine-verifiable self-regulation of the social system through the collective evaluative responses of its participants; protection from targeted destructive evaluative responses (trolling) by transferring the consequences of a negative collective evaluation to the merits of the original evaluator; rewarding evaluators who submit high-quality evaluative responses by transferring a positive collective evaluation to the merits of the evaluator; recursive reporting by evaluators on the quality of their submitted evaluative responses at an arbitrary number of nesting levels; eliminating the need for a centralized arbiter of the legitimacy of evaluative responses.

82. The method according to paragraph 81, characterized in that the social system is a social network, messenger, forum, media platform or other digital communication platform uniting individuals and / or collective entities and / or autonomous software agents; the number of impact events registered by the system and subject to assessment according to this method includes, in particular: publications, messages, comments, reposts, and other information objects created by the entities of the system; the number of actions performed in the operation of using merits in accordance with dependent on paragraphClause 77 includes, in particular: placement of an information object in the general communication circuit; promotion of an information object by way of presentation to other subjects; limitation or elimination of an information object; limitation of a subject's access to the system's functions; the number of collective subjects according to this method includes, in particular, group chats, thematic communities, and other associations of participants of the specified platform; the list of types of specified impact events, actions, and collective subjects is open.

83. The method according to paragraph 81, characterized in that the social system is a trading platform (marketplace) uniting sellers, buyers, and other participants; the number of impact events registered by the system and subject to assessment according to this method include, in particular: placement of a product or service; a buyer's review of a product, service, or seller; a seller's response to a review; other information objects created by subjects of the platform; the number of actions performed in the operation of using merits according to the clause dependent on paragraph 77 include, in particular: placement of the object of sale; promotion of the object of sale in the order of presentation to other subjects; restriction or elimination of the object of sale or review; restriction of the subject's access to the functions of the platform; resistance to manipulation of reviews is ensured by a recursive assessment of responses according to this method.

84. The method according to paragraph 81, characterized in that the evaluator subject submitting evaluative responses to the impact events of the system is an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM); the recursive evaluation of said responses according to the present method ensures machine-verifiable reporting by said evaluator agent on the quality of the evaluative responses it submits and the stability of the training procedures and / or retraining of models based on said responses to manipulation.

85. The method according to paragraph 81, characterized in that the class of grounds for operations to increase the numerical value of the subject's merit account is limited to grounds that include, in particular: the issue of merits based on the results of the reduction of assessment responses in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25; the transfer of merits under operations to use merits by other subjects directed at the given subject or at an assessment object associated with it; the accrual of merits based on the results of the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit; other grounds established by the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit, and does not include as an independent ground the receipt of monetary funds, property rights, tangible or intangible assets from any subject; the form of implementation and the name of the functional class of accounting units within which the said restriction is implemented do not affect the applicability of this invariant.

86. A method for the automated collective development of an information object, implemented by an automated computer system containing data storage facilities and data processing facilities, wherein the subject is an individual or a collective subject - an association of persons regardless of the status of a legal entity, the form of organizational and legal consolidation and formalization, or an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, another machine learning model - wherein the system contains a social capital accounting subsystem that leads the accounting of numerical units of accounting for subjects (hereinafter referred to as merit; synonymous designations and the applicability of the method regardless of the name of the said units of accounting - in accordance with the preamble of paragraph25); wherein the subject's merit account is implemented by a single entry or a set of related entries, within which the merit functions are implemented in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 25; the form of implementation and the name of the said entries do not affect the applicability of this method; this method does not create legally binding obligations for subjects of the system and other persons with respect to the disposal of any assets; including:. - maintaining in the data storage facilities of the system an information object that has a composite digital form; - receiving proposals from system subjects for changing the information object; - receiving evaluative responses from system subjects on the proposed options; - maintaining an individual record in the system for each subject - an account of the subject's merits; - implementation of a procedure for a collective decision on the adoption of one or more of the proposed options and / or their combination, in which subjects contribute to the procedure with merits from their merit accounts; - changing the records of the state of the information object stored in the system’s data storage facilities in accordance with the result of the specified procedure, characterized in that: (1) a proposal for a change option for an information object is registered in the system as a record relating the proposal to one or more subjects registered in the system - the authors of the option, and the subject registering the proposal may not coincide with the authors; (2) evaluative responses to the proposed option are received from subjects of the system, including subjects other than the authors of the option; each evaluative response is positive, negative, or neutral; (3) the value attributed to the authors of the variant based on the results of the collective decision procedure is calculated as the value of the signed convolution function, the arguments of which include the evaluative responses of subjects other than the authors of the variant; the calculated value can be positive, negative, or zero; (4) the calculated value is recorded in the system with its assignment to one or several subjects listed as the authors of the variant; (5) a change in the records of the state of an information object stored in the data storage facilities of the system occurs as a consequence of the said collective decision procedure; the ratio between the total volume of contributions made by subjects to the procedure and the value attributed to the authors of the adopted version according to criterion (3) of this paragraph is not a conversion rate constant pre-set by the system, but is calculated dynamically by the system for each collective decision procedure according to its current state, This ensures the machine-verifiable integrity of the process of collective formation of an information object and the constitutive dependence of the assignment of credit between authors and the nature of the change in the information object on the current state of the system, regardless of the specific software and hardware implementation.

87. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the information object having a composite digital form is one of the objects of an open class, which in particular include: a text document; program code; technical specification; contract; video work; audio work; three-dimensional model; knowledge structure node; artistic work; another information object having a composite digital form; the list of types of the specified information object is open.

88. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the information object has a structure that includes a set of elements - sections, blocks or other parts - and the system maintains individual records for the information object as a whole and / or for its individual elements - accounts of the assessment object - to which the system credits the values ​​calculated in accordance with feature (3) of paragraph 86, according to the rules specified by the parameters of the system; the account of the assessment object serves as a registered audit node.

89. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the value calculated in accordance with feature (3) of paragraph 86 is first credited to the account of the assessment object, linked to the information object as a whole or to a separate element of it, to which the accepted version is assigned, after which it is fully or partially transferred from the account of the assessment object to the merit accounts of the entities listed as the authors of the version, according to a predetermined rule of the system.

90. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the reception of evaluation responses to the proposed options for changing the information object and / or the reception of contributions to the collective decision procedure is carried out in one or more modes selected from an open class, which in particular include: targeted submission of a response or contribution in relation to a specific identified option; randomized pairwise comparison of the proposed options; submission of a response with expenditure from the periodic quota register P3; submission of a response with expenditure from the expense account P2; a combination of the specified modes or another mode.

91. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the procedure for a collective decision on accepting an option for changing an information object is completed upon the fulfillment of one of the conditions of an open class, which, in particular, include: the expiration of a predetermined time interval from the start of the procedure; the total volume of contributions in favor of one of the proposed options reaching a predetermined threshold value; the difference between the volumes of contributions in favor of the leading option and the option in second place reaching a predetermined value; a command from an authorized subject to close the procedure; a combination of the specified conditions or another condition specified by the parameters of the procedure.

92. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the replacement of the content of the corresponding part of the information object with the option adopted in the collective decision procedure is carried out in one of the modes: automatic mode, in which the system performs the replacement upon the occurrence of the condition for closing the procedure in accordance with paragraph 91; manual mode, in which the system performs the replacement upon a command from an authorized subject submitted after the completion of the procedure; and the mode applied is established by the parameters of the information object or the parameters of the procedure.

93. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the information object contains a set of independent parts - sections, blocks or other elements - and for each such independent part, its own procedure for a collective decision on the acceptance of a change option is implemented, carried out independently of the procedures for other parts, with its own closing conditions in accordance with paragraph 91 and its own procedure parameters.

94. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the submission by the subject of a proposal for a change option for an information object is accompanied by the mandatory expenditure of merits from his merit account by the amount specified by the parameters of the collective decision procedure or the parameters of the information object; said expenditure is a condition for registering the proposal for an option in the system, and the merits expended upon submission of the proposal are not returned to the subject's account and are not included in the reduction according to feature (3) of paragraph 86.

95. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that with respect to the merits spent by the subjects in favor of the options not accepted by the system in the collective decision procedure, one of the rules of the open class system is applied, which, in particular, include: the merits spent in favor of the not accepted option remain written off from the accounts of the subjects that spent them and are not returned to the system; the merits spent in favor of the not accepted option are transferred to the account of the merits of the subjects listed as the authors of the accepted option; the merits spent in favor of the not accepted option are returned to the accounts of the subjects that spent them in full or in part in accordance with the rule of the system; a combination of the said rules or another rule specified by the parameters of the system.

96. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the weight of the contribution of a subject to the procedure of a collective decision on the adoption of an option can be determined by the value of the non-expendable historical register P1 of this subject, used as the weight of the contribution, while the value of P1 is not changed by the specified operation.

97. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the operating parameters of the evaluation subsystem according to paragraph 86, the parameters for accepting proposals for options for changing the information object, the parameters for applying the weighting coefficients of the evaluating subjects in the reduction of evaluation responses, the parameters of the procedure for a collective decision on accepting an option, as well as other parameters of the rules of the system of the corresponding evaluation circuit are established, changed, or cancelled by the procedure for a collective decision of the participants of the said evaluation circuit.

98. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the negative part of the value calculated in accordance with feature (3) of paragraph 86 is attributed to the account of the object of assessment of the information object or its element and is not transferred to the accounts of the subjects-authors of the variant.

99. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the procedure for a collective decision on the adoption of an option is implemented as a multi-option choice from pre-listed options; the winner of the procedure is declared to be the option with the highest score for the decision option in accordance with the rules of the system.

100. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the procedure for a collective decision on the acceptance of an option is implemented as a binary “accept / reject” procedure in relation to the proposed option; the result of the procedure is one of two outcomes in accordance with the rules of the system.

101. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the submission by the subject of an evaluative response to the proposed option for changing the information object is accompanied by a mandatory substantive commentary from the subject.

102. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the system maintains an individual record for each proposed option - a solution option score - to which, when subjects submit contributions to the procedure, the values ​​calculated as functions of the merit values ​​spent by the subjects or the P1 values ​​applied by them as weight are credited; the winner of the procedure is declared to be the option with the highest solution option score, unless the rules of the procedure provide otherwise.

103. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the convolution of the evaluation responses according to the feature (3) of paragraph 86 includes multiplying each response by the weighting coefficient of the evaluating subject, wherein the weighting coefficient takes values ​​from a predetermined range and is different from a single one for at least one part of the subjects.

104. The method according to paragraph 103, characterized in that the weighting coefficient of the assessing subject is calculated as a functional convolution of at least three semantically heterogeneous components, including: the component of the formal status of the subject in the community, the component of the accumulated evaluative capital of the subject, and the component of the correspondence of the subject area to the variant of the subject’s profile area.

105. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that when canceling a variant of changing an information object previously adopted by the collective decision procedure, an operation of canceling the previously made issue of merits for this variant (reversal of the issue) is performed with the return of the amount previously credited for it from the accounts of the authors of the variant and from the account of the object of assessment; the operations of spending merits previously made by the subjects are not affected by the said operation and are not cancelled.

106. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the system architecture does not provide an interface for directly recording the numerical value of the merit score other than through operations of the system subsystems according to the rules of the system; the numerical value of the score is changed only by the specified operations.

107. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the subsystem implementing the procedure for a collective decision on the acceptance of an option is designed with the ability to revise a previously accepted option by means of a new procedure for a collective decision with the same requirements for the composition of the arguments of the reduction and for the procedure as during the initial acceptance of the option.

108. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the assets registered in the subsystem for accounting of information on community resources in accordance with paragraph 53 may be taken into account in the rules of the procedure for a collective decision on the adoption of an option to change an information object only in such forms and to such an extent that the outcome of the said procedure is not determined by the said assets in the absence or with a negligible value of the contributions of the merits of the subjects; specific rules for accounting for the said assets are adopted by the procedure for a collective decision of the community participants or are adopted by the participants upon joining the community and are applied only to the extent established by the said procedure.

109. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the information object being developed is one or more normative documents or other composite digital objects that define the rules, values, and constraints of the behavior of a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, or another machine learning model; the said information objects include, in particular: a normative document (constitution) of the model; a code of rules and values; a set of behavior instructions (system prompt); rules for interpreting queries; a list of constraints on output data; rules for selecting training data; other documents that define the behavior of the model; the list of said information objects is open; the collective entity developing said information objects may be an association of persons of any scope and composition in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 1.

110. The method according to paragraph 86, characterized in that the class of grounds for operations to increase the numerical value of the subject's merit account is limited to grounds that include, in particular: the issue of merits based on the results of the reduction of assessment responses in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25; the transfer of merits under operations to use merits by other subjects directed at the given subject or at an assessment object associated with it; the accrual of merits based on the results of the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit; other grounds established by the procedure for a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit, and does not include as an independent ground the receipt of monetary funds, property rights, tangible or intangible assets from any subject; the form of implementation and the name of the functional class of accounting units within which the said restriction is implemented do not affect the applicability of this invariant.

111. An automated system for collective decision-making in a social system based on a quantitative assessment of the impact of its subjects, where the subject is an individual, or a collective subject - an association of persons regardless of the status of a legal entity, the form of organizational and legal consolidation and formalization, including an organization, community, cooperative, association, corporation, foundation, public association, professional network, initiative group, movement, other formal or informal association of persons - or an autonomous software agent based on a machine learning model, including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, another machine learning model - containing at least one processor and at least one memory device connected to it that stores instructions executed by the processor,during the execution of which the system is designed with the capability of receiving and storing data on subjects and on the actions they have performed, receiving evaluative responses from subjects, calculating numerical indicators characterizing subjects, maintaining numerical accounts of subjects; wherein the said numerical units of accounting (hereinafter referred to as merit; synonymous designations and applicability of the system regardless of the name of the said units of accounting - according to the preamble of paragraph 25) represent a quantitative expression of the right of a subject to participate in a collective decision in the system; the subject's merit account is realized by a single entry or a set of related entries according to the preamble of paragraph 25; the form of implementation and the name of the said entries do not affect the applicability; this system does not create legally binding obligations for subjects of the system and other persons with respect to the disposal of any assets,and the actual disposal of assets based on the results of the collective decision procedures of the system is carried out by entities outside the current system, characterized in that it contains: - an impact event registration module, configured to register an impact event as a record relating an action to one or more subjects-actors registered in the system, whereby the subject registering the event may not coincide with the actor; - an evaluation and emission subsystem, designed with the capability of receiving from system entities, including entities other than actors, evaluation responses to a registered impact event, each of which is positive, negative, or neutral; calculating the estimated impact value as the value of a signed convolution function, the arguments of which include the evaluation responses of entities other than actors; and recording the calculated value in the system with its association with the registered impact event or with one or more system entities; - an account management subsystem designed to maintain a numerical account of the merits of each subject, implemented by a single entry or a set of related entries, which implement the functions of merit, including the function of making a contribution to the collective decision procedure by spending from the account and the function of submitting evaluative responses; the form of implementation of these functions and the name of the entries do not affect applicability; the numerical value of the account is changed by the subsystems of the system according to the operations stipulated by the rules of the system; - a subsystem for the use of merits, designed with the ability to perform operations for the use of merits by a subject, including as a contribution to the collective decision procedure, and to register in the data storage means a system record of the used value in one of the open class forms in accordance with feature (1) of paragraph 25; - a collective decision subsystem, designed with the ability to implement a collective decision procedure, the result of which is a change in the records stored by the system about the state of the social system and / or its organizational structure, whereby subjects contribute to the procedure by spending from their accounts, This ensures the machine-verifiable integrity and auditability of the numerical merit accounts of subjects and the operations of changing the records stored by the system on the state of the social system, regardless of the specific software and hardware implementation of the system.

112. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that it is designed with the possibility of implementing the method according to any of paragraphs 1, 25, 77, 81, 86 of this formula and dependent on the said independent paragraphs; including with the possibility of implementing the said methods in any combination within the framework of a single automated computer system; due to which a single software and hardware implementation of the said methods in their entirety is ensured.

113. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the account maintenance subsystem maintains at least five merit registers of different semantics: a non-expendable historical register of subject P1, an expense account P2, a periodic non-cumulative quota register P3, a register of the assessment object P4 with a pair of indicators "current / cumulative accumulated", a register of the collective subject P5; wherein P1 is not reduced during expenditure operations, and P3 is replenished to the limit value with the unspent balance of the previous period being reset to zero.

114. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that it contains a subsystem for anti-fraud verification of rating responses, designed with the ability to sequentially apply to rating responses received in the convolution of the rating-emission subsystem, a composition of at least two independent validator factors, which, in particular, include: a factor for identifying coalition rating and a factor for the history of reliability of the rating subject; the list of said validator factors is open.

115. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the evaluation and emission subsystem is configured to issue merits to the account of the subject's merits from open-class sources, which in particular include: aggregation of evaluation responses from other subjects according to the method according to paragraph 25; automatic evaluation of the subject's actions by the system rules; verifier evaluation; accrual by an authorized subject based on the results of a collective decision; accounting for the results of the subject's impact assessment from external sources, which include internationally recognized indicators of social and environmental impact, decisions of other collective subjects, data from integrated external systems; another source of emission adopted by the procedure of a collective decision of the participants in the evaluation circuit; the applicability of the system does not depend on the source from which the emission of merits was made.

116. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that it contains a subsystem for the use of merits, designed with the ability to cascade the selection of a write-off source register from among registers P1-P5 depending on the type of use operation, the sign and direction of the contribution and the role of the subject; and a subsystem for the inter-level conversion of expendable merits between the levels of the organization of subjects while maintaining the balance invariant for the bilateral acceptance of the participating levels and with the sovereignty of the parameters of each level.

117. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the expenditure subsystem is designed with the capability of simultaneously receiving from a subject in one collective decision procedure contributions of two types: a contribution written off from the periodic non-cumulative quota register P3, and a contribution written off from the expenditure account P2; the rules for accounting for the said contributions in the procedure are established by the parameters of the collective decision procedure of the corresponding evaluation circuit.

118. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the same operation of spending merits by a subject is taken into account by the evaluation-emission subsystem as the subject’s evaluation response to an impact event in accordance with the method according to paragraph 25 and, at the same time, by the collective decision subsystem as the contribution of said subject to the collective decision procedure in accordance with the method according to paragraph 1; the rules for said double accounting are established by the parameters of the corresponding evaluation circuit.

119. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that it contains a parametric contract subsystem, configured with the ability to combine static distribution bases - a pre-agreed share of the founder of the object of assessment and an agreed contribution - and a dynamic component determined by the merits awarded to subjects for impact events associated with the said object; the said subsystem is configured with the ability to record the parameters and results of distribution in a system record by means of a smart contract executed in a distributed registry; the actual disposal of assets based on the results of the said recording is carried out by subjects outside the present system.

120. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the evaluation-emission subsystem weights the evaluation response with a weight calculated as a functional convolution of at least three semantically heterogeneous components, including: a component of the formal status of the subject in the collective subject, a component of the accumulated evaluation capital of the subject, and a component of the conformity of the area of ​​the evaluated impact event with the subject’s specialized area.

121. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the evaluation and emission subsystem is designed with the ability to cancel a previously produced emission of merits (reversal of the emission) upon cancellation of a previously registered impact event; upon reversal, the amount previously credited for this event is written off from the accounts of the subject actors and from the account of the object of evaluation within the limits of the amount actually credited previously.

122. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that it contains a subsystem for the inter-level conversion of expendable merits between the levels of the organization of entities; said subsystem is designed with the ability to preserve the balance invariant during conversion - the value does not arise or disappear during the transition between levels - and the emergence or change of the share of participation of a lower-level collective entity at a higher level occurs in the presence of a bilateral act: an act of a lower-level collective entity on the expenditure or binding of merits on account of participation, and a counter act of a higher level on the acceptance of said participation.

123. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that it is designed with the ability to implement a collective decision procedure, the subject of which is one or more attributes of a machine learning model - including a large language model (Large Language Model, LLM), a generative model, a classification model, another machine learning model - which, in particular, include: a regulatory document of the model, a set of behavior instructions, rules for interpreting queries, rules for selecting training data, and other attributes that determine the behavior of the model; the list of said attributes is open; the collective entity conducting the said procedure may be an association of persons of any scope and composition in accordance with the preamble of paragraph 111.

124. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the account maintenance subsystem contains an audit component that records each change in the numerical value of the subject's merit account, indicating the subsystem that is the source of the change and the basis for the operation; and does not provide an interface for directly recording the numerical value of the account other than through operations of the system's subsystems according to the rules of the system.

125. The system according to paragraph 111, characterized in that the class of grounds for operations to increase the numerical value of the merit account of a subject is limited to grounds that include, in particular: the issue of merits based on the results of the reduction of assessment responses in accordance with feature (2) of paragraph 25; the transfer of merits under operations to use merits by other subjects directed at the given subject or at the assessment object associated with it; the accrual of merits based on the results of the procedure of a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit; other grounds established by the procedure of a collective decision of the participants in the assessment circuit, - and does not include as an independent ground the receipt of monetary funds, property rights, tangible or intangible assets from any subject; the form of implementation and the name of the functional class of accounting units within which the said restriction is implemented do not affect the applicability of this invariant.