Deterioration assessment system, operational support equipment, method for assessing deterioration.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- TH2201004468
- Authority / Receiving Office
- TH · TH
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2021-01-19
- Publication Date
- 2026-09-03
- Estimated Expiration
- 2041-01-18
AI Technical Summary
Current methods for determining the degree of deterioration or warranty of lead-acid batteries are subjective, time-consuming, and inefficient, requiring skilled judgment and manual processes, which can lead to user dissatisfaction and increased warranty costs.
A determination device and system that acquires and analyzes various information types, including external appearance, internal inspection data, and usage history, using a database to objectively assess the battery's condition, with optional imaging and voltage measurement units, and a computer program to streamline the process.
Enables quick, accurate, and objective determination of lead-acid battery deterioration or warranty, reducing unnecessary costs and improving user satisfaction by automating the evaluation process.
Abstract
Description
Determination device, deterioration determination system, work support device, deterioration determination method, and computer program
[0001] The present invention relates to a determination device for determining the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, a deterioration determination system, a work support device, a deterioration determination method, and a computer program.
[0002] Lead-acid batteries are used in a variety of applications, including automotive and industrial use. For example, automotive lead-acid batteries are mounted on moving objects such as automobiles, motorcycles, forklifts, golf cars, and the like, and are used as a power supply source for starter motors when starting the engine, and as a power supply source for various electrical components such as lights. For example, industrial lead-acid batteries are used as a power supply source for emergency power sources and UPSs.
[0003] It is known that lead-acid batteries deteriorate due to various factors. In order to prevent power supply interruptions due to unexpected loss of function of the lead-acid battery, it is necessary to appropriately determine the degree of deterioration of the lead-acid battery and accurately determine whether replacement is necessary. Patent Document 1 discloses an invention of a deterioration determination method in which a secondary battery is discharged by being left for a desired period of time, self-discharged, or forcedly discharged, and the deterioration of the secondary battery is determined by the magnitude or ratio of the voltage or by comparison with a good secondary battery.
[0004] JP 2011-232345 A
[0005] The warranty period for automotive lead-acid batteries is set, for example, until three years have passed since installation in the vehicle, or until the mileage reaches 50,000 km, whichever comes first. Therefore, lead-acid battery retailers assess the degree of deterioration of lead-acid batteries brought in by users and determine whether they qualify for warranty coverage, such as replacement. Replacement is covered under the warranty only when a product malfunctions; for example, batteries that have recovered after charging are not eligible for replacement. Furthermore, batteries that have malfunctioned due to overuse, inadequate user care, negligence, or accidents are not eligible for replacement. Lead-acid battery retailers must determine whether a battery is eligible for replacement based on a manual, which requires a lot of time and effort.
[0006] The degree of warranty is determined using the following procedure: (1) Check the usage condition (period of use, mileage, breakdown status, vehicle history, warranty period). (2) Obtain appearance information (seeding, terminal corrosion, or damage to the battery case). (3) Obtain internal inspection information (specific gravity of the electrolyte or terminal voltage). (4) Determine the degree of warranty as follows: 1: Return to the user as a normal product. 2: Normal, but return after recharging. 3: Replace as a defective product. (5) If it is unclear, send it to the manufacturer, who will analyze it and make a final decision. These procedures are documented in a manual, but the decision in (4) requires a certain level of skill and experience. If the judgment is too strict, user dissatisfaction will increase, and if the judgment is too lenient, the warranty costs will increase.
[0007] An object of the present invention is to provide a determination device, a deterioration determination system, a work support device, a deterioration determination method, and a computer program that can quickly, objectively, and accurately determine the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery.
[0008] A determination device according to one aspect of the present invention includes an acquisition unit that acquires determination information for determining the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, a determination unit that determines the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery based on the acquired determination information by referring to a database that stores the determination information in correspondence with the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, and an output unit that outputs the result determined by the determination unit.
[0009] A deterioration determination system according to one aspect of the present invention includes the above-described determination device, an imaging unit that captures an image of the lead-acid battery, a voltage measurement unit that measures the terminal voltage of the lead-acid battery, a specific gravity measurement unit that measures the specific gravity of the electrolyte of the lead-acid battery, and a terminal that acquires the image, the terminal voltage, or the specific gravity and outputs it to the determination device.
[0010] A work assistance device according to one aspect of the present invention includes a receiving unit that receives, from an external terminal, judgment information for judging the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery obtained through an acquisition operation; a first judgment unit that judges the deterioration of the lead-acid battery based on the received judgment information; a second judgment unit that judges whether or not to perform the next acquisition operation of judgment information based on the result of the judgment made by the first judgment unit; and a transmitting unit that, when the second judgment unit judges that the acquisition operation should be performed, transmits instructions for the acquisition operation to the terminal.
[0011] A computer program according to one aspect of the present invention causes a computer to execute a process of acquiring judgment information for judging the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, and based on the acquired judgment information, referring to a database that stores the judgment information in association with the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, judging the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, and outputting the judgment result.
[0012] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the configuration of a deterioration determination system according to a first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a determination device. FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a terminal. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a display screen. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the processing steps of deriving the deterioration degree and determining the degree of assurance by a control unit. FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a determination device according to a second embodiment. FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a learning model. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the processing steps of generating a learning model by a control unit. FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing the processing steps of determining the degree of assurance by a control unit. FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a work assistance device according to a third embodiment. FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing the processing steps of determination by a control unit.
[0013] (Summary of the embodiment) The determination device according to the embodiment includes an acquisition unit that acquires determination information for determining the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, a determination unit that determines the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery based on the acquired determination information by referring to a database that stores the determination information in association with the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, and an output unit that outputs the result determined by the determination unit.
[0014] According to the above configuration, the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery is determined by referring to a database that stores the determination information in association with the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery. This makes it possible to determine the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery quickly, objectively, and accurately without relying on the skill of the assessor. Since the number of steps required for the determination is reduced and the determination is made quickly, user satisfaction is improved and unnecessary warranty costs are reduced. Note that the term "lead-acid battery" also includes a lead-acid battery module in which multiple lead-acid batteries are connected in series.
[0015] The determination device according to the embodiment includes an acquisition unit that acquires determination information for determining the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, and a determination unit that inputs the acquired determination information into a learning model that outputs the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery when the determination information is input, and determines the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery.
[0016] According to the above configuration, the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery can be determined easily and effectively.
[0017] In the above-described determination device, the determination information may be appearance information including liquid bleeding, corrosion of terminals, or damage to a battery case, or image information of the lead-acid battery.
[0018] Bent terminals can cause sulfuric acid to leak, and the degree of deterioration or warranty can be determined based on appearance information about the terminals, seepage, or damage, or image information confirming the terminals, leak, or damage. It can also be used to determine whether damage to the battery case is due to a manufacturing defect, abuse, inadequate care, negligence, or an accident. In other words, even if an abnormality is detected from the appearance information or image information, the degree of warranty for the lead-acid battery can be determined, such as whether it is eligible for free replacement, based on the relationship between the appearance information or image stored in the database and the degree of deterioration or warranty for the lead-acid battery.
[0019] In the above-mentioned determination device, the determination information may further include at least one piece of information selected from the group consisting of usage status information including the period of use or mileage, internal inspection information including the specific gravity of the electrolyte or terminal voltage, vehicle model information, and location information or temperature.
[0020] According to the above configuration, the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery can be accurately determined by taking into account usage status information, internal inspection information, vehicle model information, location information, or temperature. Lead-acid batteries are often brought to dealerships due to "starting problems," but the cause of the "starting problems" may be something other than a fault in the lead-acid battery, such as control by the vehicle's control device based on temperature, etc. In this case, the database can determine that the cause is the vehicle model or temperature, etc., and that the lead-acid battery is in good condition. This improves the accuracy and efficiency of determining lead-acid battery deterioration.
[0021] A deterioration determination system according to an embodiment includes any one of the determination devices described above, an imaging unit that captures an image of the lead-acid battery, a voltage measurement unit that measures the terminal voltage of the lead-acid battery, a specific gravity measurement unit that measures the specific gravity of the electrolyte of the lead-acid battery, and a terminal that acquires the image, the terminal voltage, or the specific gravity and outputs it to the determination device.
[0022] According to the above configuration, it is possible to quickly obtain internal inspection information and images and determine the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery.
[0023] The work assistance device according to the embodiment includes a receiving unit that receives, from an external terminal, judgment information for judging the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery obtained through an acquisition operation; a first judgment unit that judges the deterioration of the lead-acid battery based on the received judgment information; a second judgment unit that judges whether or not to perform the next acquisition operation of judgment information based on the result of the judgment made by the first judgment unit; and a transmitting unit that transmits instructions for the acquisition operation to the terminal when the second judgment unit judges that the acquisition operation should be performed.
[0024] According to the above configuration, the work assistance device determines whether or not to perform the next determination work based on the result of one determination process, so that unnecessary determination processes can be omitted and the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery can be efficiently determined.
[0025] The deterioration determination method according to the embodiment acquires determination information for determining the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, and based on the acquired determination information, refers to a database that stores the determination information in correspondence with the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, determines the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, and outputs the determination result.
[0026] According to the above configuration, it is possible to quickly, objectively, and accurately determine the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery without relying on the skill of the assessor.
[0027] A computer program according to an embodiment causes a computer to execute a process of acquiring judgment information for judging the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, and based on the acquired judgment information, referencing a database that stores the judgment information in association with the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, judging the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, and outputting the judgment result.
[0028] According to the above configuration, it is possible to quickly, objectively, and accurately determine the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery without relying on the skill of the assessor.
[0029] 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the configuration of a deterioration determination system 10 according to embodiment 1. In the deterioration determination system 10, a determination device 1 of a manufacturer of a lead-acid battery (hereinafter referred to as a battery) 3 and a terminal 2 of a store selling the battery 3 are connected via a network N such as the Internet. The store selling the battery 3 is equipped with a camera 4 that captures an image of the battery 3, a tester 5 that measures the voltage between the terminals of the battery 3, and a hydrometer 6 that measures the specific gravity of the electrolyte in the battery 3, located close to the terminal 2.
[0030] The determination device 1 acquires determination information for determining the deterioration and degree of warranty of the battery 3 from the terminal 2, determines the degree of deterioration of the battery 3, determines the degree of warranty, and transmits the obtained results to the terminal 2.
[0031] FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of the determination device 1. The determination device 1 includes a control unit 11 that controls the entire device, a main memory unit 12, a communication unit 13, an auxiliary memory unit 14, and a clock unit 15. The determination device 1 can be configured with one or more servers. The determination device 1 may perform distributed processing using multiple devices, or a virtual machine may be used. The control unit 11 can be configured with a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), etc. The control unit 11 may be configured to include a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit). A quantum computer may also be used.
[0032] The main memory unit 12 is a temporary storage area such as a static random access memory (SRAM), a dynamic random access memory (DRAM), or a flash memory, and temporarily stores data required for the control unit 11 to execute arithmetic processing.
[0033] The communication unit 13 has a function of communicating with the terminal 2 via the network N, and can transmit and receive required information. Specifically, the communication unit 13 receives determination information transmitted by the terminal 2. The communication unit 13 transmits the determination results of the degree of deterioration and the degree of warranty of the battery 3 to the terminal 2.
[0034] The auxiliary storage unit 14 is a large-capacity memory, a hard disk, or the like, and stores programs necessary for the control unit 11 to execute processing, a program 141 for performing a process of determining the degree of deterioration and warranty (described later), a determination history DB 142, and a usage history DB 143. The determination history DB 142 may be stored in another DB server.
[0035] The program 141 stored in the auxiliary storage unit 14 may be provided by a recording medium 144 on which the program 141 is readably recorded. The recording medium 144 is, for example, a portable memory such as a USB memory, an SD card, a micro SD card, or a CompactFlash (registered trademark). The program 141 recorded on the recording medium 144 is read from the recording medium 144 using a reading device (not shown) and installed in the auxiliary storage unit 14. The program 141 may also be provided by communication via the communication unit 13. The timing unit 15 measures time.
[0036] 3 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of the terminal 2. The terminal 2 includes a control unit 21 that controls the entire device, a main memory unit 22, a communication unit 23, an operation unit 24, a display panel 25, an auxiliary memory unit 26, a GPS receiving unit 27, and a speaker 28. The terminal 2 can be configured, for example, as a personal computer, a smartphone, a tablet, etc. The control unit 21 can be configured with a CPU, a ROM, a RAM, etc. The control unit 21 may be configured to include a GPU.
[0037] The main memory unit 22 is a temporary storage area such as an SRAM, a DRAM, or a flash memory, and temporarily stores data necessary for the control unit 21 to execute arithmetic processing. The communication unit 23 has a function of communicating with the determination device 1 via the network N, and can send and receive required information.
[0038] The operation unit 24 is configured with, for example, a hardware keyboard, a mouse, a touch panel, etc., and can be used to operate icons displayed on the display panel 25, input characters, etc.
[0039] The display panel 25 can be configured as a liquid crystal panel, an organic EL (Electro Luminescence) display panel, etc. The control unit 21 controls the display of required information on the display panel 25. The control unit 21 displays information such as the degree of deterioration and warranty of the battery 3 obtained from the determination device 1 on the display panel 25.
[0040] The auxiliary storage unit 26 is a large-capacity memory or the like, and stores programs necessary for the control unit 21 to execute processes, and a web browser program (hereinafter referred to as the program) 261. The program 261 is provided from the determination device 1 by communication via the communication unit 13. The program 261 may be provided by a recording medium 262 on which the program 261 is readably recorded.
[0041] The GPS receiving unit 27 receives radio waves from a plurality of GPS satellites and detects the position of the terminal 2. The speaker 28 outputs sound in accordance with instructions from the control unit 21.
[0042] Table 1 shows an example of a table stored in the determination history DB 142.
[0043]
[0044] The assessment history DB 142 stores a No. column, a usage period column, a usage status column for a mileage column, a liquid bleeding column, a terminal corrosion column, an appearance information column for a battery case damage column, an image column, an electrolyte specific gravity column, an internal inspection information column for a terminal voltage column, a vehicle model column, a location information / temperature column, a charge / discharge test result column, a disassembly inspection result column, a deterioration level column, and an assessment column. The No. column stores row numbers for battery 3 assessments performed on multiple different batteries 3 or on the same battery 3 at different times. The usage period column stores the usage period after the battery 3 was installed or replaced. The mileage column stores the mileage of the vehicle equipped with the battery 3. The liquid bleeding column stores the degree of electrolyte bleeding on a five-point scale, for example, from 1 to 5. 1 indicates no bleeding, and the higher the number, the greater the degree of bleeding. The terminal corrosion column stores the degree of terminal corrosion on a five-point scale, from 1 to 5. A value of 1 indicates no corrosion at all, and the higher the number, the greater the degree of corrosion. The battery case damage column includes the lid and stores the degree of damage in five levels from 1 to 5. The usage status column may further include information on the vehicle history and the warranty period for the battery 3. The appearance information column may further include information on deformation, discoloration, and liquid level (liquid level) of the battery case.
[0045] The image sequence stores images of the battery 3. The images preferably include images from the front, side, back, and top view. It is even more preferable to include a bottom view. The electrolyte specific gravity sequence is expressed, for example, in five levels from 1 to 5, with 3 corresponding to the specific gravity of the battery 3 at the time of manufacture, and the specific gravity decreasing as the value increases, with 1 indicating a state in which the specific gravity has increased by 4 to 6% compared to the initial value. Furthermore, 5 indicates a state in which the specific gravity has decreased by 4 to 6%. The terminal voltage sequence stores the amount of decrease in terminal voltage in five levels from 1 to 5. "1" is the voltage at the start of use, and the amount of voltage decrease increases as the value increases.
[0046] The vehicle type column stores the vehicle model. The location information / temperature column stores the location information or temperature of the evaluation location. Instead of temperature, the temperature of the battery 3 may be stored. The charge / discharge test column stores test results, such as capacity retention, from a charge / discharge cycle test. The capacity retention rate is expressed as a percentage of the capacity at the time of evaluation, assuming the initial capacity to be 100%. The dismantling inspection column displays a four-level evaluation value, for example, from 1 to 4, based on information obtained through dismantling, such as corrosion of the positive electrode current collector, loss of electrolyte, positive electrode softening, and the presence or absence of sulfation, as well as the connection state between the electrode plate assembly and the terminals. "1" indicates a problem-free state at the start of use, and the higher the number, the greater the degree of deterioration, such as the presence or absence of corrosion, loss of electrolyte, positive electrode softening, and sulfation. "3" indicates the highest degree of deterioration, and "4" indicates that the degree of deterioration is "3" but that deterioration has occurred due to usage conditions such as user negligence.
[0047] The deterioration level column is expressed in four levels based on the results of charge / discharge tests and disassembly inspections. "1" indicates no deterioration, and as the number increases, deterioration progresses. "3" indicates the highest degree of deterioration, and "4" indicates that the degree of deterioration is "3", but deterioration has occurred due to usage conditions such as user negligence.
[0048] The determination column stores the determination result of the degree of warranty. The following four levels are examples of the degree of warranty: 1: Return to the user as a normal product. 2: Normal, but return after recharging. 3: Replace as a faulty product. 4: Faulty, but the malfunction was caused by the user's actions, so replace for a fee. Warranty level "1" corresponds to deterioration level "1", warranty level "2" corresponds to deterioration level "2", warranty level "3" corresponds to deterioration level "3", and warranty level "4" corresponds to deterioration level "4".
[0049] The assessment history DB 142 is not limited to storing all of the above-mentioned items as assessment information. The assessment information may include at least appearance information or an image. Furthermore, the assessment of the degree of deterioration is not limited to using both the charge / discharge test results and the dismantling inspection results. The evaluation method (stage) for each item is also not limited to the above-mentioned cases.
[0050] The determination history DB 142 may store data for each battery 3 model or vehicle type. There are many cases where a battery 3 is brought to a dealer due to "starting problems," but the cause of the "starting problems" may be something other than a malfunction of the battery 3, such as control by the vehicle's control device based on the temperature, etc. In this case, the battery 3 is determined to be normal. This will reveal such trends depending on the vehicle model, improving the accuracy and efficiency of the determination. Recent failure statistics can also be set for each model.
[0051] Table 2 shows an example of a table stored in the usage history DB 143.
[0052]
[0053] The usage history DB 143 stores, for each battery 3, a number column, a usage period column, a mileage column, a usage status column, an appearance information column of a liquid seepage column, a terminal corrosion column, a battery case damage column, an image column, an electrolyte specific gravity column, a terminal voltage column, an internal inspection information column, a vehicle model column, a location information / temperature column, a deterioration degree column, and a judgment column. Table 2 shows the usage history of a battery 3 with ID No. 1. The usage period column, mileage column, liquid seepage column, terminal corrosion column, battery case damage column, an image column, an electrolyte specific gravity column, a terminal voltage column, a vehicle model column, a location information / temperature column, a deterioration degree column, and a judgment column store the same content as the usage period column, mileage column, liquid seepage column, terminal corrosion column, battery case damage column, an image column, an electrolyte specific gravity column, a terminal voltage column, a vehicle model column, a location information / temperature column, a deterioration degree column, and a judgment column in the judgment history DB 142. The deterioration degree column stores the deterioration degree derived as described below, and the determination column stores the assurance level of the battery 3 based on the derived deterioration degree.
[0054] The following describes a method in which the determination device 1 estimates the deterioration level of the battery 3 and determines the warranty level of the battery 3 in four stages. The description is for a case in which the control unit 11 acquires and determines the warranty level based on the usage state, appearance information, images, internal inspection information, vehicle model, location information, or temperature. The determination information includes at least appearance information or image information.
[0055] FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a display screen. The display screen in FIG. 4 shows the results of the determination made by the control unit 11 based on the staff's input using the operation unit 24 on a web browser screen displayed on the display panel 25 based on the program 261. The control unit 21 displays, on the left side of the display screen, an input field for the vehicle model, an input field for the usage status (start date of use, mileage), and an input field for appearance information (liquid bleeding, terminal corrosion, and battery case damage). The control unit 21 displays an image display button and a send button in the upper center of the display screen, and input fields for the specific gravity of the electrolyte and terminal voltage in the lower part. The control unit 21 displays a button for sending location information and a display field for temperature in the upper right part, and displays the determination results for the degree of deterioration and the degree of warranty.
[0056] The staff member enters the manufacturer name and model of the battery in the vehicle model input field. The date of use start is entered in the start date input field. When the start date of use is entered, the control unit 21 displays the calculated usage period in the usage period field adjacent to the start date input field. The number of kilometers traveled is entered in the mileage input field. The staff member enters the results of their five-point evaluation in the input fields for electrolyte bleeding, terminal corrosion, and battery case damage. When the staff member clicks the image display button, the control unit 21 displays multiple images captured using the camera 4. The staff member clicks the selection area in the lower right corner of the captured image and then clicks the send button, transmitting the selected image to the assessment device 1. The staff member enters the results of their five-point evaluation in the input fields for electrolyte specific gravity and terminal voltage. When the staff member clicks the location information send button, location information is transmitted to the assessment device 1. The control unit 21 may display the temperature based on the location information in the temperature display field, or may accept temperature input from the staff member and transmit it to the assessment device 1. Instead of temperature, the control unit 21 may accept input of the temperature of the battery 3. The procedure shown in the flowchart of FIG. 5 will be described below with reference to this diagram.
[0057] 5 is a flowchart showing the procedure for deriving the deterioration degree and determining the degree of warranty by the control unit 11. The control unit 21 acquires the vehicle model input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S201). The control unit 21 transmits the vehicle model to the determination device 1 (S202). The control unit 11 receives the vehicle model and stores it in the usage history DB 143 (S101).
[0058] The control unit 21 transmits the location information detected by the GPS receiving unit 27 to the determination device 1 (S203). The control unit 11 receives the location information and stores the temperature corresponding to the location information in the usage history DB 143 (S102).
[0059] The control unit 21 acquires the usage status, such as the usage period and mileage, input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S204). The control unit 21 transmits the usage status to the determination device 1 (S205). The control unit 11 receives the usage status and stores it in the usage history DB 143 (S103).
[0060] The control unit 21 acquires appearance information such as liquid bleeding, terminal corrosion, and battery case damage input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S206). The control unit 21 transmits the appearance information to the determination device 1 (S207). The control unit 11 receives the appearance information and stores it in the usage history DB 143 (S104).
[0061] The control unit 21 acquires an image of the battery 3 taken by the staff member using the camera 4 (S208). The control unit 21 transmits the image to the determination device 1 (S209). The control unit 11 receives the image and stores it in the usage history DB 143 (S105).
[0062] The control unit 21 acquires internal inspection information such as the specific gravity of the electrolyte measured by the staff using the hydrometer 6 and the terminal voltage measured by the tester 5 (S210). The control unit 21 transmits the internal inspection information to the determination device 1 (S211). The control unit 11 receives the internal inspection information and stores it in the usage history DB 143 (S106).
[0063] The control unit 11 derives the degree of deterioration (S107). The control unit 11 derives the degree of deterioration corresponding to the acquired assessment information based on a rule base of the relationship between the usage state, appearance information, images, internal inspection information, vehicle model, location information, and temperature stored in the assessment history DB 142 and the degree of deterioration based on the charge / discharge test results and dismantling inspection results. In other words, the degree of deterioration is determined by the combination of information for each item. If the relationship can be expressed as a function, the control unit 11 may set multiple thresholds in stages for the value of the function and derive the degree of deterioration based on the obtained value of the function and the thresholds.
[0064] The control unit 11 determines the level of warranty based on the degree of deterioration (S108). If the degree of deterioration is "1", the control unit 11 determines the level of warranty as "1", if the degree of deterioration is "2", if the degree of deterioration is "3", if the degree of deterioration is "4", the control unit 11 determines the level of warranty as "3", and if the degree of deterioration is "4", the control unit 11 transmits the result (S109) and ends the process. The control unit 21 receives the result (S212), displays it on the display panel 25 (S213), and ends the process.
[0065] According to this embodiment, the degree of deterioration or warranty of the battery 3 is determined by referencing the determination history DB 142, which stores the determination information in association with the degree of deterioration or warranty of the battery 3, so that the degree of deterioration or warranty of the battery 3 can be determined quickly, objectively, and accurately without relying on the skill of the staff. The reduction in the number of steps required for determination and the rapid determination improves user satisfaction and reduces unnecessary warranty costs.
[0066] 6 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a determination device 1 according to embodiment 2. The determination device 1 according to embodiment 2 has the same configuration as the determination device 1 according to embodiment 1, except that a program 145 and a learning model 146 are stored in the auxiliary storage unit 14, the program 145 is installed in the auxiliary storage unit 14 by a recording medium 147, and the contents of the tables in the usage history DB 143 are different.
[0067] Table 3 shows an example of a table stored in the usage history DB 143.
[0068]
[0069] The table of the usage history DB 143 of the second embodiment has the same configuration as the table of the first embodiment, except that it stores an actual measurement determination column in addition to the contents of the table of the usage history DB 143 of the first embodiment. The actual measurement determination column stores the determination results of the degree of assurance of the actual measurement based on the charge / discharge test results and the disassembly inspection results. The actual measurement determination is performed for re-learning, which will be described later, and does not need to be performed at every determination time.
[0070] FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the learning model 146. The learning model 146 is intended for use as a program module that is part of artificial intelligence software. It can use a multilayer neural network (deep learning), such as a convolutional neural network (CNN), or a recurrent neural network (RNN). When using an RNN, judgment information is input over time and a degree of assurance is output over time. Other machine learning methods may also be used. In accordance with instructions from the learning model 146, the control unit 11 performs calculations on the judgment information input to the input layer of the learning model 146 and operates to output the degree of assurance and its probability as a judgment result. In the case of a CNN, the intermediate layer includes a convolution layer, a pooling layer, and a fully connected layer. The number of nodes (neurons) is not limited to that shown in FIG. 7.
[0071] The input layer, output layer, and intermediate layer each have one or more nodes, and the nodes in each layer are connected in one direction with desired weights to the nodes in the previous and next layers. A vector having the same number of components as the number of nodes in the input layer is provided as input data (input data for learning and input data for judgment) to the learning model 146.
[0072] The trained input data includes at least appearance information or image information. As described above, the appearance information is a staff member's evaluation of at least one of the following: liquid bleeding, terminal corrosion, and battery case damage, on a five-point scale. Images preferably include front, side, back, and top views, and more preferably a bottom view. Images captured to show at least the terminals and the presence or absence of leakage and the extent of battery case damage are preferably input. For example, bending of the terminals can cause sulfuric acid leakage. Appearance information or image information about the terminals, leakage, and damage can be input into the learning model 146 to obtain a warranty level based on the degree of deterioration. When appearance information or image information including an abnormality such as battery case damage caused by a usage problem is input, a warranty level of "4" is output, indicating replacement for a fee. The assessment information may further include at least one of usage status information, internal inspection information, vehicle model information, location information, and temperature.
[0073] The input layer of the trained learning model 146 receives decision information. Data provided to each node in the input layer is input to the first hidden layer, where the output of the hidden layer is calculated using weights and activation functions. The calculated value is then provided to the next hidden layer, and so on, propagating to subsequent layers (lower layers) in a similar manner until the output of the output layer is determined. Note that all weights connecting the nodes are calculated by the learning algorithm.
[0074] The output layer of the learning model 146 generates the degree of assurance and its probability as output data. For example, the output layer outputs the following: Probability that the degree of assurance is 1...0.03 Probability that the degree of assurance is 2...0.90 Probability that the degree of assurance is 3...0.06 Probability that the degree of assurance is 4...0.01
[0075] 8 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the process of generating the learning model 146 by the control unit 11. The control unit 11 reads the judgment history DB 142 and acquires training data in which the judgment information of each row is associated with the degree of assurance (S301).
[0076] The control unit 11 uses the training data to generate a learning model 146 (trained model) that outputs a probability of the degree of assurance when judgment information is input (S302). Specifically, the control unit 11 inputs the training data to the input layer, performs calculations in the intermediate layer, and obtains the probability of the degree of assurance from the output layer. The control unit 11 compares the judgment result of the degree of assurance output from the output layer with information labeled for the judgment information in the training data, i.e., the correct value, and optimizes parameters used in the calculations in the intermediate layer so that the output value from the output layer approaches the correct value. The parameters include, for example, the weights (coupling coefficients) and activation function coefficients described above. The parameter optimization method is not particularly limited, and the control unit 11 may optimize various parameters using, for example, an error backpropagation algorithm. The control unit 11 stores the generated learning model 146 in the auxiliary storage unit 14 and terminates the series of processes.
[0077] 9 is a flowchart showing the procedure for determining the degree of guarantee by the control unit 11. The control unit 21 acquires the vehicle model input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S221). The control unit 21 transmits the vehicle model to the determination device 1 (S222). The control unit 11 receives the vehicle model (S111).
[0078] The control unit 21 transmits the position information detected by the GPS receiving unit 27 to the determination device 1 (S223). The control unit 11 receives the position information (S112).
[0079] The control unit 21 acquires the usage status, such as the usage period and mileage, input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S224). The control unit 21 transmits the usage status to the determination device 1 (S225). The control unit 11 receives the usage status (S113).
[0080] The control unit 21 acquires appearance information such as liquid bleeding, terminal corrosion, and battery case damage input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S226). The control unit 21 transmits the appearance information to the determination device 1 (S227). The control unit 11 receives the appearance information (S114).
[0081] The control unit 21 acquires an image of the battery 3 taken by the staff member using the camera 4 (S228). The control unit 21 transmits the image to the determination device 1 (S229). The control unit 11 receives the image (S115).
[0082] The control unit 21 acquires internal inspection information such as the specific gravity of the electrolyte measured by the staff using the hydrometer 6 and the terminal voltage measured by the tester 5 (S230). The control unit 21 transmits the internal inspection information to the determination device 1 (S231). The control unit 11 receives the internal inspection information (S116).
[0083] The control unit 11 inputs the judgment information to the learning model 146 (S117). The control unit 11 acquires the degree of assurance based on the degree of assurance and probability output by the learning model 146 (S118). The control unit 11 acquires the degree of assurance when the probability is 80% or higher, for example. The control unit 11 transmits the result of the degree of assurance to the terminal 2 (S119) and ends the processing. The control unit 21 receives the judgment result (S232). The control unit 21 displays the judgment result on the display panel 25 (S233) and ends the processing.
[0084] The control unit 11 can retrain the learning model 146 based on the degree of assurance determined using the learning model 146 and the degree of assurance obtained by actual measurement so as to improve the reliability of the determination. For example, in No. 2 of Table 3, the determination result by the learning model 146 matches the determination result based on actual measurement. Therefore, by inputting a large amount of training data in which the determination result is associated with the determination information in row No. 2 and retraining, the probability of the determination result can be increased. If the determination result by the learning model 146 does not match the determination result based on actual measurement, training data associated with the determination result based on actual measurement is input and retrained.
[0085] According to this embodiment, the degree of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery can be easily and effectively determined. The learning model 146 may input an image to multiple convolution layers and pooling layers for compression, combine the image data of the pooling layer with other determination information, and then input the image data to multiple convolution layers and pooling layers for compression, and output the degree of warranty. The above-described learning model 146 has been described as outputting the degree of warranty based on the determination information, but this is not limiting. The control unit 11 may also output the degree of deterioration based on the determination information. The control unit 11 acquires the degree of deterioration from the learning model 146 and determines the degree of warranty based on the degree of deterioration.
[0086] 10 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a work support device 17 according to embodiment 3. The work support device 17 according to embodiment 3 has the same configuration as the determination device 1 according to embodiment 1, except that a program 148 is stored in the auxiliary storage unit 14, and the program 148 is installed in the auxiliary storage unit 14 by a recording medium 149. A terminal 2 of a dealer of batteries 3 is connected to the work support device 17 via a network N such as the Internet.
[0087] 11 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the determination process by the control unit 11. The control unit 21 acquires the vehicle model input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S241). The control unit 21 transmits the vehicle model to the work support device 17 (S242). The control unit 11 receives the vehicle model (S121).
[0088] The control unit 21 transmits the position information detected by the GPS receiving unit 27 to the work assistance device 17 (S243). The control unit 11 receives the position information (S122).
[0089] The control unit 21 acquires the usage status, such as the usage period and mileage, input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S244). The control unit 21 transmits the usage status to the work assistance device 17 (S245). The control unit 11 receives the usage status (S123).
[0090] The control unit 21 acquires appearance information such as liquid bleeding, terminal corrosion, and battery case damage input by the staff member using the operation unit 24 (S246). The control unit 21 transmits the appearance information to the work support device 17 (S247). The control unit 11 receives the appearance information (S124).
[0091] The control unit 11 determines whether or not the next image needs to be acquired (S125). The control unit 11 reads the determination history DB 142 and derives the degree of deterioration based on a rule base of the relationship between the vehicle model, location information, usage status, and appearance information and the degree of deterioration. The control unit 11 may derive the degree of deterioration based on a threshold and a function value based on the relationship. If the control unit 11 determines that the degree of deterioration is 1 and image acquisition is not necessary (S125: NO), the control unit 11 proceeds to S132 and determines the assurance level to be 1. If image acquisition is necessary (S125: YES), the control unit 11 sends an instruction to acquire an image to the terminal 2 (S126). The control unit 21 receives the instruction, displays it on the display panel 25, or outputs a sound from the speaker, prompting the staff member to acquire an image, and acquires an image of the battery 3 captured by the staff member using the camera 4 (S248). The control unit 21 transmits the image to the work support device 17 (S249).
[0092] The control unit 11 receives the image (S127). The control unit 11 determines whether the next task, an internal inspection, is required (S128). The control unit 11 reads the determination history DB 142 and derives the degree of deterioration based on a rule base of the relationship between the vehicle model, location information, usage status, appearance information, and image and the degree of deterioration. The control unit 11 may derive the degree of deterioration based on a threshold value and a function value based on the relationship. If the control unit 11 determines that the degree of deterioration is 2 and an internal inspection is not required (S128: NO), the control unit 11 proceeds to S132 and determines the warranty level to be 2. If an internal inspection is required (S128: YES), the control unit 11 transmits an instruction to perform an internal inspection to the terminal 2 (S129). The control unit 21 displays the instruction on the display panel 25 or outputs a sound from the speaker to prompt the staff to perform an internal inspection, and acquires the internal inspection information (S250). The control unit 21 transmits the internal inspection information to the work support device 17 (S251). The control unit 11 receives the internal inspection information (S130).
[0093] The control unit 11 derives the degree of deterioration based on a rule base of the relationship between the vehicle model, location information, usage state, appearance information, images, internal inspection information, and the degree of deterioration (S131). The control unit 11 may derive the degree of deterioration based on a function value based on the relationship and a threshold value.
[0094] The control unit 11 determines the degree of guarantee based on the degree of deterioration (S132). The control unit 11 transmits the result of the determination to the terminal 2 (S133) and ends the process. The control unit 21 receives the result of the determination (S252). The control unit 21 displays the result of the determination on the display panel 25 (S253) and ends the process.
[0095] According to this embodiment, the work support device 17 determines whether or not to perform the next determination task based on the result of one determination step, so that unnecessary determination steps can be omitted and the degree of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery can be determined efficiently. Note that the content of the determination step is not limited to the above-mentioned case.
[0096] The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications are possible within the scope of the claims. In other words, embodiments obtained by combining technical means modified appropriately within the scope of the claims are also included in the technical scope of the present invention.
[0097] REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 Determination device 2 Terminal 3 Battery 4 Camera (imaging unit) 5 Tester (voltage measurement unit) 6 Hydrometer (specific gravity measurement unit) 10 Deterioration determination system 11 Control unit (acquisition unit, determination unit, output unit) 12 Main memory unit 13, 23 Communication unit 14, 26 Auxiliary memory unit 141, 145, 148 Program 144, 147, 149, 262 Recording medium 261 Web browser program 142 Determination history DB 143 Usage history DB 146 Learning model 21 Control unit 24 Operation unit 25 Display panel 27 GPS receiving unit 28 Speaker
Claims
ocr1. The judgment unit consists of a receiving component that receives judgment information for determining the level of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, and a judgment component that references a recorded database to determine the consistency of the judgment information with the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery. Based on the received judgment information, it determines the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, and the output component outputs the result of the judgment by that judgment component.
2. The judgment unit consists of a receiving component that receives judgment information for determining the level of deterioration or warranty of a lead-acid battery, and a judgment component that, in the case of input judgment information, sends the received judgment information to the learning model, which outputs the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery, and then determines the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery. 3.
4. The judgment set specified in Claim 1 or 2, in which such judgment information is external information including leakage, terminal corrosion, or damage to the casing, or photographic information of the lead-acid battery.
5. The judgment set specified in Claim 3, in which such judgment information includes at least one selected piece of information from a group of information including operating status information including operating time or mileage, internal condition information including electrolyte specific gravity or terminal voltage, vehicle type information, and additional information including location or air temperature.The degradation assessment system comprises a set of judgment instruments specified in any one of Claims 1 through 4, and an imaging section which takes an image of the lead-acid battery, and a voltage measurement section which measures the terminal voltage of the lead-acid battery, and a specific gravity measurement section which measures the specific gravity of the lead-acid battery electrolyte, and a terminal receiving such image, such terminal voltage, or such specific gravity and transmitting it to the said judgment instrument.The operational support unit consists of a receiving section that receives decision information for determining the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery received by the external terminal; a first decision section that determines the lead-acid battery deterioration based on the received decision information; and a second decision section that decides whether to proceed with the next operational operation based on the result of the first decision section. Finally, a transmitter sends the operational command signal to the external terminal if the second decision section decides to proceed with the operation.The method for determining deterioration involves receiving judgment information to assess the level of deterioration or warranty of lead-acid batteries, referencing a database of recorded information, and determining the consistency of the judgment information with the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery. Based on this judgment information, the system determines the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery and outputs the judgment result. A computer program then performs the processing, receiving judgment information to determine the level of deterioration or warranty of lead-acid batteries, referencing a database of recorded information, and determining the consistency of the judgment information with the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery. Based on this judgment information, the system determines the level of deterioration or warranty of the lead-acid battery and outputs the judgment result.