An intelligent waste sorting system and method that compares user declarations with independent system results and controls them using a physical signal gate.

Abstract

The invention relates to an intelligent waste sorting system and method that compares the user declaration (600) with the independent system result (610) and controls it with a physical signal gate. The system consists of a system housing (100), a common acceptance / detection area (110), a mechanical element (400), an actuator (410) and a target waste container or group of containers (160) and, depending on the application method, a Way A verification interface (200) and / or a Way B user interface / declaration input (300), a camera or image detection unit (310) and a weighing unit (320).It includes the following elements; its characteristic feature is that the user declaration (600) and the result obtained by the system (610) are subjected to a comparison / compatibility check (620), the normal physical signal (630) is given only if it is suitable, the normal physical signal is not given if there is incompatibility (500), and the no signal policy (640) is applied, and the user is directed to the retry, redeclaration or repositioning flow (510) or the re-evaluation flow (370).

Description

1 TARIFF Comparing User Declaration with Independent System Result and Physical Signal Gate Smart Waste Sorting System and Method that Controls the System Techn k Area 5 The invention relates to the classification, acceptance, and physical control of waste, and appropriate used for directing or separating waste into reservoirs or intake / discharge pathways. It is related to smart waste sorting systems and methods. The invention specifically includes the waste class, waste subclass, target container, and acceptance route provided by the user. or user declaration regarding waste placement situation (600), if necessary waste 10 with information determined by the system or reported by the user regarding the placement status together, verification obtained by the system independently of the user or classification result (610) in the same session and placement context (350) It is related to its evaluation. This evaluation is based on considerations of validity, reliability, timeliness, and context. comparison / compatibility check (620) and via physical signal gate, physical normal physical signal (630) to be applied to the acceptance / guidance control mechanism (130) No signal given or no normal physical signal given (500) and no signal policy (640). The decision on its implementation is made. The invention is also protected from incompatibility, invalidity, low reliability, outdated results, or 20 In the case of out-of-context processing, the normal physical signal is not given (500) and there is no signal. application of pol t muscle (640); retry, re-declaration or in appropriate applications repositioning flow (510), re-evaluation flow (370) or controlled backup It deals with the implementation of the flow (520). State of the Technology Today, the available technology includes cameras, artificial intelligence, barcodes, QR codes, RFID, NFC, and product data. base, reverse vending machine, weight tracking, multi-sensor fusion and access control container Solutions include: identifying the waste, providing guidance to the user, opening a lid, or This could be useful in terms of receiving / directing waste. However, this proposal 30 2 The existence of technologies, the user declaration (600) independent system obtained by the system Comparison / compatibility check in the same session and placement context as the result (610). (620) Connecting to the physical signal gate by holding tab does not solve the need alone. The following patent documents relating to previous technology reflect the current state of affairs in the relevant field: Patent number US11104512B2 describes a multi-sensor system (camera, inductance, capacitance, load sensors, 5 Temperature sensors, infrared, NIR, spectral measurement, sound sensors, fluorescence, ml meter-wave Using radar and deep-sea cameras, it can automatically determine whether the waste is recyclable. The system describes a sensor that identifies and directs waste to the appropriate container. Based on the data, it evaluates the recyclability threshold of the waste and determines the appropriate course for the waste. It deposits it into the hopper. Compared to our invention, this system completely classifies the waste using sensor 10. The automated system leaves the decision to the user's statement; the user's statement is taken as an independent result of the system. a control loop that compares and, in case of discrepancy, blocks the normal physical signal It does not include. The user cannot question the accuracy of the decision made by the system or... It is not possible to compare with the statement; in case of erroneous classification, the user No feedback is provided at the time of the action. 15 Patent number US7562025B2 concerns barcode / RFID scanning of medical waste, database querying, and The correct waste container is determined by asking the user questions and related information. The system explains that it enables the automatic opening of the container lid. The system is designed for waste. By reading the identifier, it determines the appropriate waste category from the database and sends the correct one to the user. It opens the container. Compared to our invention, this system independently calculates the result of the system based on user declaration. It does not offer a comparison verification mechanism; barcode / database matching is successful. When this happens, it directly provides physical protection. If the user makes a false statement or If the barcode is associated with the wrong product, the system will detect this discrepancy. a comparison / compatibility check that will block the normal physical signal and physical signal The door is not closed. Also, the context of the session / placement is control, reliability 25 technical interaction cycle such as evaluation and retest / re-statement flow It does not contain any elements. Patent number WO2014179667A2 concerns the capture of images of solid waste materials, data... Comparison with the images at the bottom and selection of the appropriate reservoir for the user or The system describes a robotic arm that directs waste into the appropriate container. System 30 Additionally, by locking each bin lid, it prevents the user from disposing of waste in the wrong bin. It is possible to prevent this. According to our invention, this system classifies waste using image processing. 3 It is based on automated recognition; it receives the user's statement and generates an independent system result. comparing and evaluating this comparison in terms of validity, reliability, timeliness, and session / placement. a control architecture that connects the context to the physical signal gate along with the control mechanism It does not provide. The user cannot submit their own statement against the system's classification decision; In case of non-compliance, failure to provide a normal physical signal, re-declaration / re-declaration 5 Positioning flow and the correct target class are technical interactions such as the policy of not directly reporting the target class. The cycle elements are not included. Barcodes, QR codes, RFID, NFC, product codes, labels, or database records are all types of documents that can be read by machines. In systems using data (250), it is possible to read information related to a product or waste object. Verified target class data snn (240) does not mean that it is generated in every case. Verification 10 when it cannot be done, when no match is found in the database or the product is not available with the user declaration (600) When the defining / verifying input (230) is inconsistent, the normal physical signal is not given. (500) and the application of the signal absence policy (640) remain as a separate technical control distinction. Similarly, camera or image sensing unit (310), artificial intelligence-assisted classification, Weight measurement brm (320), load sensor or multi-sensor fusion outputs alone reliable lr 15 The physical control decision should not be considered. The system result obtained from these outputs (610), user together with the declaration (600) validity, reliability, up-to-dateness and related session or placement normal physical signal without being evaluated in terms of its suitability to the context (630) It should not be triggered. Therefore, under adverse conditions, the normal physical signal is not given (500) and there is no signal 20 The implementation of the pol t muscle (640) is only a warning or information shown in the user interface. not the message; physical access / acceptance / direction control mechanism (130) normal opening, acceptance, This is a result of technical arrogance control in the form of failure to transmit the activation or redirection signal. Yen den trial, yen den declaration or yen den positioning flow (510), yen den In applications where evaluation flow (370) or controlled backup flow (520) are foreseen, these 25 Flows should not be evaluated as normal suitability or normal success results. Controlled. backup flow (520), failure to provide normal physical signal (500) and no signal policy (640) It should be treated as a separate and conditional support flow. 4 Purpose of the Invention The purpose of the invention is to utilize the waste class, waste subclass, target bin, and acceptance route provided by the user. or user declaration regarding waste disposal situation (600), independently of the user As a result of the system obtained (610), together with (350) in the same session and placement context. The aim is to present a smart waste sorting system and method that enables evaluation. 5 The other purpose of the invention is to compare the user declaration (600) with the system result (610) in this evaluation. Compatibility in terms of target class, equivalent target class, target reservoir or acceptance pathway; along with validity, reliability, currency, and contextual appropriateness checks. Comparison / compatibility check (620) and connecting to the physical signal gate. Thus only in the appropriate condition is a normal physical signal (630) given; inconsistency, invalidity, low 10 reliability, up-to-date results, failure to achieve the expected result, or out-of-context processing. In this case, no normal physical signal is given (500) and no signal pol t muscle (640) is applied. The purpose of the invention is to enable the flow based on the A.Way verification interface (200), B.Way user interface / declaration input (300) and decision / fusion unit (340) based flow or together applications in which it is used, same statement-result-context evaluation and physical signal gate 15 The goal is to support modular design under the control panel. The other purpose of the invention is to enable retry and re-testing in cases where a normal physical signal is not given. declaration or repositioning flow (510), re-evaluation flow (370) or Controlled backup flow (520) without showing normal suitability or normal success result gb It is about management. User awareness, supporting correct sorting behavior or 20 The user's reconsideration of their own decision depends on this physical control decision. It is considered as an auxiliary consequence. Explanation of the Figures Figure 1: User declaration (600), system result (610), comparison / compatibility check (620), 25 control or decision unit (140), actuation control unit (150), normal physical signal (630), normal physical signal not being given (500), retry / re-statement flow (510) and This is a general working principle diagram showing the physical signal gate. Figure 2: A.Path verification interface (200) and B.Path user interface / declaration view (300), fz ksel er ş m / kabul / yönd rme kontrol düzeneğ ne (130) ve hedef ef hopper or hopper 30 The diagram showing the connection to group (160) is view k. Figure 3: A. Path verification interface (200), phone application (210), c. device-based verification interface (220), product identifier / verification g rd sn (230), verified target class ver sn (240), machine readable data (250), transfer / session data (260), control or decision showing brmn (140), actuation control brmn (150) and physical control arrangement n (130). This is a detailed flowchart. 5 Figure 4: B.Yolu user interface / declaration entry (300), camera or image detection unit (310), weight measurement unit (320), weight analysis unit (330), B. Way decision / fusion unit (340), session / placement context (350), reliability / error / doubt indicator (360), appropriate In this case, actuation control brmn (150) and physical access m / acceptance / direction control the system (130), in the case of inappropriate situation, normal physical signal not being given (500) and 10 Detailed flow showing the re-test / re-declaration / re-positioning flow (510) It is a diagram. Figure 5: Physical access / acceptance / direction control system (130), mechanical element (400) and actuator (410) with cover, lock, drawer, flap, bar place, turnstile, inner guide or equivalent This is a schematic representation showing how the mechanism can be implemented. 15 Figure 6: B.Yolu user interface / declaration entry (300), camera or image detection unit (310), weight measurement unit (320), weight analysis unit shown at different stages of flow (330), B. Way decision / fusion brmn (340), session / placement context (350), showing the reliability / error / doubt indicator (360) and the reassessment flow (370) This is a detailed diagram. 20 Figure 7: System independent of receiving user declaration (600) and user declaration. After obtaining the result (610), this data was subjected to comparison / compatibility check. (620) tab keeping; giving normal physical signal (630) in compliance, in non-compliance By applying the s nyal yok pol t muscle (640), the normal physical signal is not given (500), new trial / new declaration / new positioning flow (510) and terc hl correct target 25 This is a flowchart showing the policy of not directly notifying the class (530). Figure 8: Controlled backup flow (520), other / equivalent acceptance chamber or acceptance point (540) and Showing that the conformity / safety audit (550) can be implemented without considering normal success. It is a flowchart. Figure 9: Joint decision of only Path A, only Path B, or A+B common system variants 30 This is a schematic view showing that the core (140) can be connected to the physical signal gate. 6 Figure 10: System body (100), common reception / sensing area (110), optional fluid discharge section (120) and optional fluid grid (121), physical control device (130), target reservoir group (160), target containers (161-166), B.Yolu user interface / declaration view (300), camera or image sensing brm (310), weight measurement brm (320), mechanical element (400) and actuator (410) This is a sample physical front view of the B. Road side. 5 Figure 11: System body (100), optional fluid discharge section (120) and optional fluid inlet. (121), physical control mechanism (130), target chamber group (160), target chambers (161-166), A.Way includes the verification interface (200), mechanical element (400) and actuator (410). This is a sample physical front view of the side. Figure 12: System body (100), optional fluid discharge section (120) and optional fluid inlet 10 (121), fz ksel control mechanism (130), target hopper group (160), weight measurement unit (320) and The example top view of the A+B k-sided containing the k element (400) is shown. Explanation of References Reference No. Element Name 100 S stem body 110 Common areas of acceptance / perception 120 Optional fluid drainage section 121 Optional liquid group 130 Physical access / acceptance / guidance control system 140 Control or decision unit 150 Actuation control units 160 Target waste bin / bin group 161 Plastic target container 7 Reference No. Element Name 162 Glass target chambers 163 Metal target chambers 164 B biodegradable target container 165 paper target tray 166 D value / non-convertible target container 200 A. Path verification interface 210 Phone applications 220°C base level verification interface 230 Product identifier / verification g rd s 240 Verified target class data 250 Mak nece okuab lr ver 260 Transfer / session data 300 B. Road user interface / declaration form 310 Camera or image detection unit 320 Weight measurement units 330 Weight analysis zbrm 340 B.Yolu decision / fusion brm 350 Session / placement context 360° Reliability / Error / Doubt Indicator 8 Reference No. Element Name 370 Yen to be evaluated. 400 Mechanical Engineers 410 Actuator 500 Normal physical signal not given 510 Yen trial / yen declaration / yen positioning flow 520 Controlled backup flow 530. The policy of not directly stating the correct target class. 540 D equivalent acceptance hopper or acceptance point 550 Compliance / safety audit 600 User testimonials 610 Results obtained by the system regardless of user declaration. 620 Comparison / Compliance Audit 630 Normal physical signal 640 S nyal yok pol t muscle Table of Procedures Step-by-Step Explanation a Receiving user statement (600) and associating it with session / embedding context (350) b Generating or receiving the system result (610) independent of the user declaration. 9 Step-by-Step Explanation c. Conducting statement-result compatibility, validity, reliability and context control (620) d Only in suitable conditions can it produce a normal physical signal (630). to Failure to give normal physical signals in case of incompatibility or insecurity (500) and no signal pol t muscle (640) application f Re-testing, re-declaration or re-positioning flow (510) or redirection to the reassessment flow (370) g Learning without directly stating the correct target class in the application (530) loop creation h In the A.Way or A+B application, the A.Way verification interface (200), product identifier / validation g rd sn (230), validated target class ver sn (240), mak nece okuab lr ver y (250) ve / or aktar / sesrum ver sn (260) fz ksel linking to control decision B.Yolu user interface / declaration view in B.Yolu or A+B application (300), camera or image sensing brmn (310), weight measurement brmn (320), weight anal zbrmn (330), B.Yolu decision / fusion brmn (340), session / placement context (350) and reliability / error / doubt indicator (360) to the fusion decision connecting j Updated according to the session / placement context (350), incorrect session or misplacement contextual rejection of the result k Controlled backup flow (520), equivalent acceptance reservoir or acceptance point (540) and compliance / safety check (550) to prevent blockage; not counting normal success l Physical access control system (130), mechanical element (400) and operation in different physical mechanism forms via actuator (410). Creating a technical interaction loop that detects user errors at the time of the action. Detailed Description of the Invention The invention relates to the proper channeling, acceptance, or physical disposal of waste into the correct target class or container. It is an intelligent waste sorting system used in the field of waste control. The invention... Working principle b, waste can only be recognized by automatic k, only by reading br code or only It is not based on opening a cover. Common 5 located inside the system body (100) acceptance / perception area (110), the independent result of the user’s statement and the system is the same technical The decision chain is the starting area where the decision is taken (Figure 1). In this chain, the control or decision unit (140), actuation control unit (150), physical access control mechanism / acceptance / direction control system (130), Target waste bin or bin group (160) together with mechanical element (400) and actuator (410) It works (Figure 2). 10 The common technical core in the detailed explanation, user declaration (600) and user declaration The validity of the independent system result (610) is not only in terms of class name matching; in terms of reliability, up-to-dateness and session / placement context (350) Two separate technical data evaluated together within the scope of comparison / compatibility audit (620) It is to be considered as such. In the context of the same session and placement (350) waste 15 The result of the system that cannot be adjusted (610) is not considered sufficient for normal physical achievement. This joint assessment, comparison / compatibility check (620) resulted in physical normal physical signal is given to the acceptance / guidance control mechanism (130) It is connected to the physical signal gate where it is determined that it will not be given. Physical signal gate only It's not a software message giving information to the user, it's a normal physical signal, physical control 20 The technical basis that determines whether the system (130) can be used is... Discrepancy, invalid validation, low reliability, unreliable result, expected The system result may not be generated, the result may be outdated, or the result may be out of context. System refers to opening, acceptance, activation, or guidance that results in normal physical success. the normal physical signal is not given without producing a signal (500) and the signal absence policy 25 (640) applies. This result is not only a warning shown in the user interface, but also a physical The normal actuation signal is not transmitted to the acceptance / guidance control mechanism (130). It is the result. User declaration (600) and system result (610), in the same session and the same placement They are also evaluated together in terms of whether or not they are considered waste within the context. Previous session, 30 not relating to previous placement status or currently assessed physical acceptance status The updated or out-of-context result alone is not sufficient to trigger a normal physical signal. 11 This is not considered sufficient; this distinction is based on a fixed duration, a fixed score, or a requirement for specific equipment equivalency. It does not create. In cases where a normal physical signal is not given, retesting, re-declaration or re-testing is required. positioning flow (510), re-evaluation flow (370) or controlled backup flow (520) GB support flows can be operated. Controlled backup flow (520), normal availability or normal 5 It's not about accurate parsing success; it's about preventing the device from becoming blocked or the acceptance / placement area. It is an exceptional support flow operated under separate conditions to ensure safe unloading. Recording and observable behavior support, inconsistencies in the applications where it is used, normal physical no signal given (500), no signal policy (640), retry or re-declaration 10 decisions of flow (510), reassessment flow (370) or controlled backup flow (520) Technical analysis and traceability can help in understanding the process. However, record keeping, Normal physical signal transmission or non-transmission is not considered a necessary condition; The main technical result is a control decision linked to the physical signal gate. The distinguishing technical connection of the system is the user declaration (600) shown in Figure 7. the result obtained by the system regardless of the statement (610) 15 Comparison / compatibility check (620) is connected to the physical signal gate. If the control is positive, a normal physical signal (630) can be produced; if the control is negative, a normal physical signal cannot be produced. No signal is given (500) and no signal policy (640) is applied. Thus, single camera, QR, Barcode, database, weight sensor, cover, lock, or actuator are not presented separately as the main difference; These elements, in a technical sense, form the chain of declaration-result-context control and physical inspection. He wins. This common chain serves as the same technical backbone for both Route A and Route B, as seen in Figure 9. It is used. A. The path provides the source data, mostly validation data, and the validated target class data. via, B. Way, source selection, prepared statement, image, weight and context. It can occur; however, in both cases, the physical outcome passes through the same decision point. 25 Route A and Route B can be implemented as different application routes under the same core invention. The system is available with variants for using Route A alone, Route B alone, or Route A and Route B together. It can be established; combined use of A+B is not considered the only necessary mode of operation of the invention. The common technical core of these variants is the user declaration (600) user-independent system. The result (610) is evaluated within the context of the same session / placement and this evaluation is 30 It is connected to the physical signal gate. Regardless of which path is used, it should only be used if it is suitable. 12 Normal physical signal data; discrepancies, invalidity, low reliability, outdatedness. In the case of a result or an out-of-context result, the normal physical signal is not given. User Declaration and System Result Data Flow The user declaration shown in Figure 7 (600), the user's waste class, subclass, target bin (160), It is the technical code given regarding the acceptance route or placement situation. In the first step of the method 5 (step a), user statement (600) is received and associated with session / deployment context (350). This declaration is made via the A.Path verification interface (200) or the B.Path user interface / declaration entry (300) It can be obtained from there. Therefore, the statement is not just a selection on the screen, but also in a specific session. The data input is linked to the moment of disposal or placement. The result obtained by the system (610) is information 10 which repeats the user statement (600) exactly. is not; it is the independent technical result of the auditing of the statement (600). In the second step of the method (step b) Obtained by the system independently of the user declaration via Route A or Route B. The resulting product (610) is produced or obtained. Product identifier in terms of Route A as seen in Figure 3. or validation input (230), validated target class version (240) and machine readable version (250) or transfer / session data (260) may be the source of this result. B. Road camera 15 or image sensing brm (310), weight measurement brm (320), weight analysis brm (330), B. Path decision / fusion brm (340), session / placement context (350) and reliability / error / doubt The indicator (360) can generate or support the system result. User declaration in Figure 7. (600) The flow link shown between the system result (610) is that this step is in the same session. Shows the order of operations; the system result (610) is the exact repetition of the user statement (600) 20 That doesn't mean anything. The distinction between declaration and system result is specifically preserved. The user's choice constitutes system acceptance. The result is not considered valid; the system result automatically invalidates the user's statement. It is not a decision in itself. The data, whether they are related to the same waste in the current session, is sufficient. whether they are reliable and up-to-date and whether the physical control result can be reliably obtained 25 They are considered together in terms of whether they can be linked or not. Thus, misrepresentation or false information Contextual system outcomes do not directly translate into normal physical success. Joint Decision and Physical Signal Gateway In the common decision logic shown in Figure 1, the decision unit (140), user statement (600) and system the result (610) not only in terms of class name matching; target class, target reservoir, acceptance 30 in terms of methodology, validity, reliability, timeliness, session context, and placement context. 13 It checks. In the third step of method n (step c), the user declaration (600) is obtained by the system. The results obtained (610), target class, target reservoir, acceptance route, validity, reliability, up-to-dateness and subject to a comparison / compatibility check (620) in terms of the session / placement context. is kept. Comparison / compatibility check (620), from the wrong session, updated, 5. Low reliability, misplacement, or incompatible with existing waste. The result is not considered sufficient for physical success. In this context, it is outdated and incorrect. The result is rejected due to the context of the session or incorrect placement (step j). As seen in Figure 4. reliability / error / doubt indicator (360) and session / placement context (350) therefore This is not a supporting note to the decision, it is a physical examination requirement. If the comparison / conformity check (620) shown in Figure 1 is positive, the control or decision unit 10 (140), actuation control unit (150) normal physical signal (630) can be produced. In the fourth step (step d) of Method n, normal operation occurs only when all eligibility conditions are met. The physical signal (630) is generated. This signal is accessed / accepted / directed by the control system. (130), mechanical element (400) and actuator (410) on the target reservoir or reservoir group (160) Each result can be converted into acceptance or referral. If the audit is negative, the fifth step of the method 15 According to step (step e), no normal physical signal is given (500) and no signal policy (640) is applied. This result is not just displaying a warning on the screen, but also normal physical performance. the failure of actuation to occur. A physical signal gate represents the technical equivalent between software decisions and physical mechanisms. Decision unit (140) before reaching a positive result actuation control unit (150) normal physical 20 It does not send signals; therefore, the system only provides an interface that offers suggestions or informs the user. It differs from being (Figure 2). A. Workflow A. Way, the statement provided by the user (600), verification obtained by the system or The classification result is evaluated as an application path connecting to the physical signal gate. 25 This path, product identifier or validation g rd s (230), validated target class ver s (240), The machine can be operated via readable data (250) or transfer / session data (260). QR code, barcode, phone application (210), scanner, device head verification interface (220), NFC, RFID, BLE, W-F, wired transmission or direct device connection are some of the elements for the A-Way. Examples of application methods may exist; however, Route A is not necessarily limited to any of these elements. It is not limited. The technical aspect is more about verified or unverified rather than a specific transmission method. 14 the result of the system together with the user declaration (600) and the same session / placement context It is an evaluation. The verification result is valid, current, solvable and compliant with the user declaration (600). When the lg lfz ksel er ş m, acceptance or redirection control mechanism (130) normal fz ksel s nyal verl leb l r. Verification failed, invalid, outdated, out of context or 5 When inconsistent with the declaration, the normal physical signal is not given; this result is only for the user interface. The problem is not the message itself, but the failure to transmit the normal actuation signal to the physical control mechanism. B. Route Workflow B. Way, camera only (310), artificial intelligence only or gravity line only It is not evaluated. Within the scope of B. Way, the user declaration on the device (600), image-based 10 classification, weighting, placement context (350), reliability / error / doubt indicator (360) and as a result of the decision / fusion, together or in subsets according to the method of implementation It can be evaluated. Weight measurement unit (320), raw or related to the waste sample or placement condition. It can be considered as a structure that provides normal weight measurement data. Weight analysis (330) 15 By interpreting this measurement flow, the asset, lifting, stability, validity, weight characteristic or It can generate error / doubt indicator and decision support outputs; this distinction is between constant gram, constant equation, constant There is no time limit or specific sensor model requirement. B. Way decision / fusion brm (340), image, weight, context and reliability information n by evaluating the system result in technical data separate from the user declaration (600) (610) 20 creates or supports. The result of the system in question (610) is the same as the user statement (600). It is subject to comparison / compatibility check (620) in the context of session and placement. Low reliability, inconsistency, invalidity, failure to achieve the expected decision outcome, If the result is out of context or out of order, a normal physical signal is not given. In cases where a normal physical signal is not given via the B.Yolus, retry and re-declaration are required. 25 or repositioning flow (510) and re-evaluation flow (370) can be supported. If controlled backup flow (520) is to be applied, this is normal suitability or normal correct separation. It is not considered a success, but rather a limited flow of support operated under separate conditions. Physical Access, Acceptance or Guidance Mechanism The physical access / acceptance / guidance control system (130) shown in Figure 5, decision chain 30 It is the output layer through which the physical world is connected. This mechanism alone is not what distinguishes the invention; difference, user report, independent system result, context / reliability check, and physical signal. It is operated depending on its connection to the gate. In the method, at step n (step 1), different physical Access, admission, or guidance is provided through the mechanisms of the device. The physical mechanism includes a cover, klt, drawer, flap, bar, turnstile, internal guide, guiding channel, acceptance path actuator or equivalent mechanism. Mechanical element (400) and actuator (410) are 5 of these arrangements. Examples of sub-components are... The normal physical signal (630) is not just the lid opening signal; physical access, acceptance, different types of actions such as locking, unlocking, activating, or operating the directional control mechanism. It can correspond to physical outputs. Failure to Provide Normal Physical Signal, Retry and Correct Target Class Directly 10 Notification Policy The failure to give the normal physical signal (500) and the no signal policy (640) seen in Figure 7, It is not only to display error messages on the user interface. User statement (600), system If the result (610) and comparison / compatibility check (620) are not positive, the physical signal gate It remains closed and actuation control unit (150), physical control mechanism (130) normal physical 15 does not produce or transmit a signal (630) (step e). This situation is a declaration-result discrepancy, invalid validation g rd s, failure to generate validated target class data, low confidence level, outdated or incorrectly contextualized results, liquid, multiple waste, unidentifiable, or similar. Error / doubt indicators may arise due to various reasons. Re-testing, re-declaration or re-positioning flow (510) with re-20 The evaluation flow (370) is not just the retry statement on the screen. The sixth method In step (step f), if the normal physical signal is not given, the user must re-declare, re- It is directed to testing or repositioning. This flow involves new declaration, new verification. g rd s, repositioning of waste within common acceptance / detection area (110), new image / weight / context data or reassessment of the current session with physical 25 It enables the signal gate to be reactivated. The policy is to not directly indicate the correct target class. (530) It is not mandatory in every application; in some forms of application, the seventh step of the method According to (step g), the correct target class is not directly stated and the user's self-declaration is required. A learning cycle is created by supporting the correction. 16 Controlled Backup Flow Controlled backup flow (520), normal success, normal suitability or normal correct separation is not. Failure to give normal physical signal (500) and signal absence policy (640) Implementing this may not require the device to remain permanently blocked; however, this situation may be incompatible or An unreliable transaction does not mean it will turn into normal success. Specify again 5 When the trial, waiting, re-declaration or repositioning conditions are exhausted; waste when still in the common acceptance / sensing area (110); c device remains blocked or table When operational risks arise due to remaining full, controlled backup flow (520) is a separate process. It can be used as a mode. In the eleventh step of the method (step k), safety / compliance conditions When a controlled backup flow (520) is applied, which is not considered a normal success, the c reservoir is blocked. 10 prevent it from staying. In this mode, controlled backup flow (520), equivalent / receiving chamber or receiving point (540) and Conformity / safety audit (550) is evaluated together. Conformity or safety audit (550) if positive actuation control unit (150), physical control mechanism (130) normal fz ksel s nyalden (630) fark ed leb lr şartlu br komut verdi kontrol yedek şu (520) 15 It can start. The goal is not to open the correct target class or to achieve successful parsing; it's to find common ground. safely clearing the receiving area, preventing the device from becoming blocked, or limiting waste disposal. to take to the acceptance point. Normal target reservoir (160) in the context of controlled backup flow. Even if the reservoir (540) is the same physical reservoir, the operating mode is different. This event varies depending on the application. It can be marked or saved. 20 Behavioral Change / Educational Technique Interaction Effect Behavioral change occurs not as a result of abstract social benefit or rigorous training, but through technical interaction. It is treated as a cycle. User declaration (600) is received (step a), system result (610) independently is produced or purchased (step b), comparison / compatibility check (620) is carried out (step c), If there is compatibility, normal physical signal (630) is given (step d), if there is incompatibility, normal physical signal 25 No signal is given (500) and no signal policy (640) is applied (step e). The user receives this result. The act of disposing of waste is observed during the process; the error does not remain merely as information reported later. In the thirteenth step of method n (step m), the erroneous statement is transformed into normal physical success. By preventing the user from realizing their mistake at the time of the action, what kind of interaction cycle is this technique aimed at? is created. 30 In applications using the policy of not directly notifying the correct target class (530), some system types In these situations, instead of directly stating the correct class, either correct the user's statement or... 17 You can request the repositioning of the waste (step g). Retesting, re-declaration or new positioning flow (510) and new evaluation flow (370), new sensor data, The new verification input or new declaration reactivates the physical signal gate. (step f). It is important that if controlled backup flow (520) is implemented, this is not considered normal success. (step k); otherwise, the erroneous operation could be presented as successful behavior. Therefore, the invention is permanent. 5 It does not claim to definitively ensure or prove a change in behavior; it attributes user error to the action. Techniques that aim to create immediate awareness and support the learning cycle through repeated use. It offers an interactive structure. Optional Implementation Elements The working principle described is the form of the body (100), the number and order of the reservoir (160), the lid 10 placement, screen position, camera position, reader position, weight plate position or The specific A+B physical layout is not limited to this. A. Path: data channels, B. Path: sensors, fz ksel mekan zma t pler , optional liquid discharge section (120), class-based target reservoirs (161-166) and controlled backup flow elements (520) may vary depending on the application. The technical core of the invention is the user’s declaration (600), independent of the user’s declaration 15 Comparison / compatibility check (620) with the result obtained by the system (610). holding; this control or decision unit (140) and actuation control unit (150) connecting to the physical access / acceptance / routing control system (130); suitable In the negative case, the normal physical signal (630) is not given, in the negative case, the normal physical signal is given. It is the application of the non-transferable signal policy (500) and the absence of signal policy (640). Application method and 20 Depending on the resulting condition, the flow of retry, re-declaration or re-positioning (510), reassessment flow (370), policy of not directly notifying the correct target class (530), controlled backup flow (520), equivalent acceptance reservoir or acceptance point (540) and Compliance / safety audit (550) can be used as optional or conditional support flows. Of the steps (a) to (m) described above, those that are appropriate to the application method and condition are 25 By carrying out the user declaration (600), the independent system result (610) is the same physical signal. A holistic, smart waste sorting system is created, monitored at the entrance.

Claims

18 REQUESTS 1. Invention, waste sorting, recycling management, user-interactive physical access control. and for the technical control of waste acceptance / rejection mechanisms;  s stem nfz ksel supporting structure providing brs stem body (100),  A common understanding / perception where the declaration, perception and physical decision-making regarding waste are prior to a shared understanding. 5 area (110),  operating in accordance with normal physical signal (630) or controlled backup flow (520) mechanical element (400) and actuator (410) that operates the mechanical element,  at least one target waste container where the waste will be accepted or directed, if appropriate. or reservoir group (160), 10  According to the application method, from among the following groups of elements:  As a group of elements of the A. Way, separate from the user declaration (600) in technical data A. Way verification to ensure the production or receipt of the system result (610). ver sns steme alan br A.Yolu verification interface (200),  A product that is the source of obtaining verified target class data 15 descriptive / verification g rd s (230),  Machine-readable data carrying verified target class or session information. (250) transfer / session data from (260) at least one;  As a B.Yolu element group, a B.Yolu user who receives the user declaration on device c. interface / declaration gr ş (300), 20  source of the system result (610) separate from the user declaration (600). a camera or image sensing unit that provides the image data (310),  The raw weight data which is the source of the said system result (610) is a weight that provides a weight. Measurement unit (320);  25 containing one or both of these element groups br smart waste interaction ms system,  A user who places the class / target / placement decision into the technical decision chain statement (600), 19  Verification, classification, or decision / fusion result independent of user declaration a result obtained by the system (610),  User statement (600) and result obtained by the system (610) target class, target reservoir, acceptance route, validity, reliability, currency, and session / placement context Comparison / harmonization audit (620), 5  Evaluating the user statement (600) and the result obtained by the system (610) and Comparison / harmony audit (620) conducted by a control or decision unit (140),  a system that converts the decision outcome into a control output to be applied to the physical mechanism. actuation control brm (150),  A physical approach that links the decision outcome to the outcome of acceptance or guidance. 10 er ş m / kapım / dirend rme control mechanism (130),  a normal physical mechanism that operates for normal success under appropriate conditions signal (630) and  Normal in cases of incompatibility, invalidity, low reliability, or incorrect context. Failure to provide normal physical signal which prevents physical success (500) and no signal 15 pol t muscle (640) Its character is defined by çermes.

2. According to claim 1, brs is a system and the system is not given a normal physical signal (500) and If the no signal policy (640) is implemented, the user will be required to make a new declaration, a new verification or repositioning to retest / re-declare / repositioning flow 20 (510) or is characterized by its redirection to the reassessment flow (370).

3. Which of the previous systems is a system according to any of them, and the system is also the A. Way system. As a result, the physical decision z nc r ne participatory verified target class ver s (240) includes and if this data (240) cannot be verified, the normal physical signal is not given (500). and is characterized by its connection to the implementation of the no signal policy (640). 25 4. Which of the previous systems is a different system, and the system also has a raw weight. a source that produces derived data from another source, such as properties of existence, removal, stability, or doubt. Weight analysis (330) is characterized by its inclusion.

5. Which of the previous systems is a system that is different from any of the others, and which also includes a camera or image. Image data provided by sensing brmnn (310), raw data provided by weight measurement brmnn (320) weight data, weight analysis data provided by (330), session / placement by evaluating the context (350) and the reliability / error / doubt indicator (360) together with the user producing the result of the B. Way system (610) in separate technical data from the declaration (600) or 5 The supporting br B.Yolu decision / fusion brm (340) is characterized by its inclusion.

6. A system that is different from any of the previous systems, and also a system defined by the system itself. whether the obtained result (610) is related to correct seating and correct waste placement a reviewer that checks and updates the data or rejects results that are incorrectly contextualized. The session / placement context (350) is characterized by its inclusion. 10 7. This system is different from any of the previous systems, and the system also has low reliability. Liquid, multiple waste, unidentifiable or similar hazards contribute to normal physical signal interference. The data is characterized by the inclusion of a reliability / error / doubt indicator (360).

8. Which of the previous systems is a system based on one of them, and the system is also re-designed. conditional br 15 which prevents device c from remaining blocked after trial / wait, not normal success. controlled reserve flow (520), equivalent acceptance reservoir (540), conformity inspection (550) The character is being categorized.

9. Compared to any of the previous systems, this is a system where the user also has their own system. supporting the correction of the statement and the failure to give the normal physical signal (500) and no signal pol t muscle (640) re-test / re-declaration flow (510) and re-evaluation flow 20 (370) policy of not directly notifying the preferred target class working together (530) Its character is defined by çermes.

10. According to any of the previous systems, lid, lock, drawer, flap, bar, turntable, etc. Physical access / acceptance / guidance applied as a guiding or equivalent mechanism The control mechanism (130) is characterized by its features. 25 11. Which of the previous systems is a system based on any of them, and is the A.Path verification interface? (200) phone application (210) and / or c device head verification interface (220) implementation and product identifier / verification g rd sn (230) QR, barcode, RFID, NFC, BLE, W - F, via wired transmission or direct electronic transmission channels, at least through br. It is characterized by its structure in a way that allows for receivables. 30 21 12. According to claim 1, brs stem and s stem n also liquid discharge section (120) and liquid to it group of elements consisting of (121) and at least one of the class-based target containers (161-166). It is characterized by the presence of one or both elements from the group of elements it contains.

13. Invention, waste sorting, recycling management, user-interactive physical access control 5 and for the technical control of waste acceptance / rejection mechanisms;  receiving the user declaration (600) and session / location context (350) l şk lend r lmes (adım a),  System regardless of user declaration (600) via Route A or Route B The production or acquisition of the result obtained by (610) (step b), 10  According to the application b ç m, A. Way verification data classfz ksel control decision connecting (step h),  Pathway B: Connecting the image, weight, analysis and context data to the fusion decision (step ) Among the steps, select steps (step a) and (step b); also select steps (step h) or (step 15). At least one method, A+B, which includes both, has the following characteristic:  User statement (600) and the result obtained by the system (610) target class, target reservoir, acceptance route, validity, reliability, currency, and session / placement context In terms of comparison / compatibility check (620), (step c),  outdated, incorrect session or not suitable for session / placement context (350) 20 rejection of the non-existent result (step j),  normal physical signal (630) is produced only when all suitability conditions are met (step d),  inconsistency, invalidity, low reliability, outdated results or context In the case of non-existence, the normal physical signal is not given (500) and the signal absence policy is 25 (640) implementation (step e),  If a normal physical signal is not given, the user may retry, resubmit, or to repositioning flow (510) or to re-evaluation flow (370) guidance (step f) 22 His steps are like a circle.

14. According to claim 13, it is a method whose characteristic is that the method also has the correct target in the preferred application. the policy of not directly declaring the class (530) and correcting the user’s self-declaration It includes the step (step g) of creating a learning cycle through support.

15. According to claim 13, it is a method whose characteristic is that the method also involves retry or 5 Normal success occurs when safety / compliance conditions are met after the waiting period. uncounted br controlled reserve flow (520), equivalent acceptance tank (540), conformity inspection m (550) implementation step (step k) includes.

16. According to claim 13, this is a method, and its feature is: A. Method verification data class personal control. the step of deciding on the product identifier / verification g rd snn (230) A. Way 10 Obtaining the validation interface (200), generating the validated target class data (240). or received, machine readable data (250) or transfer / session data (260) It includes the sub-steps of transferring and submitting to comparison / compatibility audit (620).

17. According to claim 13, it is a method whose characteristic is the B-Path image, weight, analysis and context. The step of connecting the data to the fusion decision (step); B. Way user interface / declaration view 15 (300) User declaration (600) received, camera or image detection unit (310) Providing image data, producing raw weight data, weight measurement unit (320), weight The creation of derivative data by the analysis zbrm (330), decision / fusion brm (340) by B.Yolu image, weight and analysis data together with the session / placement context (350) by evaluating the user declaration (600) and the system result in the technical data quality 20 (610) creation or support, reliability / error / doubt indicator (360) audit participation and comparison of the said system result (610) with the user statement (600) It includes the sub-steps of submitting the comparison / compatibility audit (620) to the relevant authority.

18. According to claim 13, it is a method whose characteristic is physical access / acceptance / guidance control. (130) cover, lock, drawer, flap, bar, turnstile, internal guide or equivalent 25 The step (step 1) of operating the mechanism via ZMA is included.

19. According to claim 13, it is a method whose characteristic is that the erroneous statement does not affect normal physical success. By preventing the conversion, the technique aims to make the user realize their mistake at the time of the action. The step (step m) of creating the interaction cycle is included.

Images