Evaluation method of cosmetics, evaluation system and evaluation platform thereof

TW202632590AActive Publication Date: 2026-08-01TAIYEN BIOTECH
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
TW · TW
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
TAIYEN BIOTECH
Filing Date
2025-01-16
Publication Date
2026-08-01

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

The manual process of creating cosmetic safety assessment reports is time-consuming and labor-intensive, requiring significant manpower and being prone to subjective errors due to reliance on personal experience.

Method used

An automated method, system, and platform for evaluating cosmetic ingredients that uses evaluation data and category information to generate adjustment results, reducing the need for manual confirmation and improving accuracy.

Benefits of technology

The system simplifies the evaluation process, enhances report generation efficiency, and increases the accuracy of safety evaluations by automating data adjustments and report generation.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure TWG2TA001069512_001
    Figure TWG2TA001069512_001
  • Figure TWG2TA001069512_002
    Figure TWG2TA001069512_002
  • Figure TWG2TA001069512_003
    Figure TWG2TA001069512_003
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The present invention discloses an evaluation method of cosmetics, an evaluation system and an evaluation platform thereof. The evaluation method comprises: retrieving a product information and a category information of a product; obtaining an ingredient information corresponding to the product information, and computing the ingredient information so as to generate a evaluation data; analyzing the evaluation data to determine whether the evaluation data is abnormal, and generating an adjustment result by computing the evaluation data and the category information if the evaluation data is abnormal; and generating a evaluation report according to the evaluation data and the adjustment result. The evaluation system, by executing the evaluation method, enables the user to obtain a precise and objective evaluation report corresponding to the product through the evaluation platform.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] An evaluation method, system and platform thereof, particularly relating to a cosmetic ingredient evaluation method, system and platform thereof. Prior Technology

[0002] Cosmetic manufacturers or importers in Taiwan are required to establish Product Information Files (PIFs) in accordance with Article 4 of Taiwan's "Cosmetic Hygiene and Safety Management Act" and the "Cosmetic Product Information File Management Regulations." Cosmetic manufacturers or importers of a certain scale and whose cosmetic categories have been announced by the central competent authority must do so before supplying, selling, giving away, publicly displaying, or providing cosmetics to consumers for trial, in order to ensure that cosmetics on the market have undergone appropriate safety assessments.

[0003] Establishing product information files requires processes such as ingredient data collection and screening, exposure assessment models, and margin of safety (MOS) calculations to obtain relevant data and write corresponding assessment reports according to regulations. In this way, cosmetic safety data signatories must find the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) in the toxicology database according to the product's ingredients and proportions, and calculate the MOS value based on the possible exposure dose to provide conclusions and issue formal reports. However, generally speaking, when the MOS value does not meet safety standards, the assessment data needs to be adjusted and confirmed based on the experience of the cosmetic safety data signatories. Therefore, in the past, writing assessment reports consumed a lot of time and manpower.

[0004] Therefore, the present invention provides a method, system and platform for evaluating cosmetic ingredients, which generates corresponding adjustment results from evaluation data and category information, automatically adjusts the evaluation data, and automatically generates an evaluation report based on the adjusted evaluation data, solving the problem of needing manual confirmation one by one in the past. At the same time, it increases the accuracy of the evaluation report and reduces the influence of personal subjective experience. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The main objective of this invention is to provide a method for evaluating cosmetic ingredients, which uses evaluation data and category information for calculation, thereby generating corresponding adjustment results based on different products to meet the evaluation needs of different products.

[0006] Another objective of this invention is to provide a cosmetic ingredient evaluation system. The system uses an input unit to obtain information about the product to be evaluated and its category, and then uses a processing unit to perform data calculations to generate adjustment results. Finally, a report generation unit generates a report, thus solving the problem of having to manually check and confirm each product and judge the evaluation results based on experience.

[0007] Another objective of this invention is to provide a cosmetic ingredient evaluation platform with a personalized input interface that allows users to import product information. The platform is easy to use and can improve evaluation efficiency.

[0008] To achieve the above objectives, one embodiment of the present invention discloses a method for evaluating cosmetic ingredients, comprising the following steps: obtaining product information and category information of a product; obtaining corresponding ingredient information based on the product information; performing calculations on the ingredient information to generate evaluation data; comparing the evaluation data to determine if it is abnormal; if the evaluation data is abnormal, performing calculations on the evaluation data and the category information to generate a corresponding adjustment result; and generating an evaluation report based on the evaluation data and the adjustment result.

[0009] In a preferred embodiment, the adjustment result includes one of the following:

[0010] When the category information matches a preset application site, or when the category information does not match the preset application route, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is less than a first preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is not less than a first preset distribution parameter and not greater than a second preset distribution parameter, then the adjustment result is a first skin absorption rate.

[0011] When the information of this category does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is not less than a first preset molecular weight and not greater than a second preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is greater than a third preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a second skin absorption rate.

[0012] When the information in this category does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the second preset molecular weight and less than a third preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient is compared. If the distribution parameter is less than the first preset distribution parameter or greater than the second preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a third skin absorption rate.

[0013] When the information of this category does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the third preset molecular weight, the adjustment result is a fourth skin absorption rate.

[0014] In a preferred embodiment, the first skin absorption rate is 100%, the second skin absorption rate is 50% to 99%, the third skin absorption rate is 10% to 49%, and the fourth skin absorption rate is 1% to 9%.

[0015] In a preferred embodiment, the category information is selected from shampoo cosmetics, facial cleansing and makeup removal cosmetics, bath cosmetics, soaps, hair cosmetics, lotions / oils / creams, fragrance cosmetics, antiperspirants and deodorants, lip cosmetics, topical cosmetics, eye cosmetics, nail cosmetics, teeth whitening products, non-medicinal toothpastes, and mouthwashes, and the preset application site is selected from the oral cavity and mucous membranes.

[0016] In a preferred embodiment, during the step of performing calculations using the component information to generate corresponding evaluation data, the toxicological data of the component information is compared to see if it is complete. If the toxicological data is incomplete, a prompt message is output to execute the toxicological data maintenance process.

[0017] To achieve another objective mentioned above, one embodiment of the present invention discloses a cosmetic ingredient evaluation system, comprising: a database storing ingredient information corresponding to a plurality of products; an input unit for acquiring category information and product information; a processing unit connected to the database and the input unit for acquiring the corresponding ingredient information based on the product information, and performing calculations based on the category information and the ingredient information to generate evaluation data and an adjustment result; and a report generation unit connected to the processing unit for generating an evaluation report based on the evaluation data and the adjustment result; wherein the adjustment result includes one of the following: when the category information matches a preset application site, or when the category information does not match a preset application route, comparing the molecular weight of the ingredient information, if the molecular weight is less than a first preset molecular weight, comparing the allocation parameter of the ingredient information, if the allocation parameter is not less than a first preset allocation parameter and the allocation parameter is not greater than a second preset allocation parameter, then the adjustment result is a first skin... Absorption rate; when the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is not less than a first preset molecular weight and not greater than a second preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is greater than a third preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a second skin absorption rate; when the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the second preset molecular weight and less than a third preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is less than the first preset distribution parameter or greater than the second preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a third skin absorption rate; and when the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the third preset molecular weight, the adjustment result is a fourth skin absorption rate.

[0018] In a preferred embodiment, the first skin absorption rate is 100%, the second skin absorption rate is 50% to 99%, the third skin absorption rate is 10% to 49%, and the fourth skin absorption rate is 1% to 9%.

[0019] In a preferred embodiment, a maintenance unit is included, which is signal-connected to the database to add or modify the ingredient information of the products.

[0020] To achieve another objective mentioned above, one embodiment of the present invention discloses a cosmetic ingredient evaluation platform, comprising: an input interface for inputting category information, product information, and ingredient information of a plurality of products; and a cosmetic ingredient evaluation system, signal-connected to the input interface, comprising: a database for acquiring and storing the ingredient information corresponding to the products; an input unit for acquiring the category information and the product information; and a processing unit, signal-connected to the database and the input unit, for acquiring the corresponding ingredient information based on the product information, and performing calculations based on the category information and the ingredient information to generate evaluation data and an adjustment result; and A report generation unit, signal-connected to the processing unit, is used to generate an evaluation report based on the evaluation data and the adjustment result. The adjustment result includes: when the category information matches a preset application site, or when the category information does not match a preset application route, comparing the molecular weight of the component information; if the molecular weight is less than a first preset molecular weight, comparing the distribution parameter of the component information; if the distribution parameter is not less than a first preset distribution parameter and not greater than a second preset distribution parameter, then the adjustment result is a first skin absorption... The first skin absorption rate is 100%. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is not less than a first preset molecular weight and not greater than a second preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is greater than a third preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a second skin absorption rate, which is 50%~99%. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than a third preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a second skin absorption rate, which is 50%~99%. When the molecular weight is less than a third preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is less than the first preset distribution parameter or greater than the second preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a third skin absorption rate, which is 10% to 49%. And when the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the third preset molecular weight, the adjustment result is a fourth skin absorption rate, which is 1% to 9%.

[0021] In a preferred embodiment, the input interface includes an import interface, an execution interface, and a maintenance interface. The import interface is for inputting category information and product information, the execution interface is for inputting execution instructions to perform the evaluation process of the category information and product information, and the maintenance interface is for adding or modifying the ingredient information of the products.

[0022] The beneficial effects of this invention are that it provides a simple input interface, ensuring that users can perform the evaluation report generation process through a simple and easy-to-use input interface, and automatically generate evaluation data and corresponding adjustment results with product information and category information, so as to quickly build a product information file that meets the specifications and improve the accuracy of safety evaluation reports. Simple Explanation of the Diagram

[0023] Figure 1: A flowchart illustrating a method according to one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2: It is a flowchart of one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3: It is a schematic diagram of a system according to one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4: This is a schematic diagram of the platform architecture of one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5A: It is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5B: It is a schematic diagram illustrating one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5C: It is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5D: It is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5E: This is a schematic diagram illustrating one embodiment of the present invention; and Figure 5F: It is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention. Implementation

[0024] The features and technical content of the related patent applications of this invention will be clearly presented in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0025] Please refer to Figures 1 and 2, which are flowcharts and implementation flowcharts of a method according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figures, a cosmetic ingredient evaluation method of the present invention includes the following steps:

[0026] Step S1: Obtain product information and category information for one product;

[0027] Step S2: Obtain information on one of the corresponding ingredients based on the product information;

[0028] Step S3: Perform calculations using the component information to generate evaluation data;

[0029] Step S4: Compare whether the evaluation data is abnormal. If the evaluation data is abnormal, calculate the evaluation data and the category information to generate a corresponding adjustment result; and

[0030] Step S5: Generate an assessment report based on the assessment data and the adjustment results.

[0031] Please refer to Figure 3, which is a system schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, a cosmetic ingredient evaluation system S of the present invention includes: a database 1, an input unit 2, a processing unit 3, a report generation unit 4, and a maintenance unit 5. The processing unit 3 is signal-connected to the database 1, the input unit 2, and the report generation unit 4, respectively, and the maintenance unit 5 is signal-connected to the database 1. The steps of the evaluation method are described in detail below.

[0032] As shown in step S1, firstly, product information and category information about the product are obtained through input unit 2. In one embodiment, the product information includes, but is not limited to, the ingredient name of each ingredient used in the product. The ingredient name can be presented in the form of International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients (INCI). INCI is a standardized system for naming ingredients in cosmetics, skin care products and personal care products to ensure the consistency of their ingredient names.

[0033] In one embodiment, the category information can be adopted from the categories of cosmetics in the "12th revision of SCCS Notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation" (SCCS NoG) published by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) of the European Union General Agency for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE) on May 16, 2023. These categories include, but are not limited to, shampoos, facial cleansers and makeup removers, bath products, soaps, hair products, lotions / oils / creams, fragrances, antiperspirants and deodorants, lip products, topical products, eye products, nail products, teeth whitening products, non-medicinal toothpaste, and mouthwash. Category items can also be added or removed according to regulations or the needs of businesses.

[0034] As shown in step S2, after obtaining product information, the processing unit 3 searches for and obtains the ingredient information corresponding to the product information from the ingredient information of multiple products stored in the database 1. In one embodiment, the ingredient information includes, but is not limited to, toxicological literature or experimental data on the ingredients to determine the safe dosage of the ingredients, cosmetic-related data, safety data sheets (SDS), and toxicological analysis data corresponding to high-risk ingredients. Data related to safety assessment and toxicological assessment can also be stored as needed.

[0035] As shown in step S3, the obtained component information is processed by the computing unit 3 to generate evaluation data. In one embodiment, the evaluation data includes, but is not limited to, the highest dose for which no adverse effects were observed (No observed adverse effect level, NOAEL), the systemic exposure dosage (SED), and the margin of safety (MOS).

[0036] In one embodiment, when the systemic exposure dosage (SED) is expressed as a percentage of absorption results, it is calculated based on the corresponding daily skin exposure (Edermal), ingredient concentration, and skin absorption rate. When the transdermal absorption results are expressed in μm / cm², they are calculated based on the daily skin exposure (Edermal), surface area in contact with the cosmetic (SSA), ingredient concentration, and number of daily applications. The daily skin exposure (Edermal) is calculated based on the preset average body weight, daily usage amount, and retention factor, but is not limited thereto.

[0037] In one embodiment, the margin of safety (MOS) is calculated based on the highest dose for which no adverse effects were observed (No observed adverse effect level, NOAEL) and the systemic exposure dosage (SED). The NOAEL value is mainly obtained from 90-day repeated-dose animal studies or developmental toxicity animal studies. Preferably, the corrected NOAEL value can be obtained by measuring the number of experimental days, but this is not a limitation.

[0038] In one embodiment, when the EU cosmetic safety assessment standard is adopted, a safety margin (MOS) of not less than 100 is generally considered safe, while a margin of less than 100 is considered to pose a potential risk and requires further adjustment.

[0039] In one embodiment, the processing unit 3 can further compare the toxicological data in the ingredient information to see if it is complete when processing the ingredient information. If the toxicological data is incomplete, a prompt message can be output so that the maintenance unit 5 can perform the toxicological data maintenance process. In other words, the product ingredient information can be added or corrected in the maintenance unit 5, but this is not limited to this.

[0040] As shown in step S4, after obtaining the evaluation data, the calculation and processing unit 3 will compare whether the evaluation data is abnormal. When the evaluation data is abnormal, it will perform calculations based on the evaluation data and category information to generate corresponding adjustment results. Specifically, the adjustment results include, but are not limited to, one of the following:

[0041] 1. When the category information matches the preset application site, where the preset application site is selected from the oral cavity and mucous membranes, it means that the product is determined to be a product that comes into contact with the oral cavity or mucous membranes based on the product category information. For example, if the product is toothpaste or mouthwash, since such products inevitably enter the human body directly through the oral cavity or mucous membranes, if there is no experimental data, the result is adjusted to the first skin absorption rate, where the first skin absorption rate is 100% to obtain the most stringent safety limit.

[0042] If the category information does not match the preset application route, the processing unit 3 will further compare the molecular weight of the ingredient information. When the molecular weight is less than the first preset molecular weight, it will compare the distribution parameters of the ingredient information. When the distribution parameters are between the first preset distribution parameters and the second preset distribution parameters, the adjustment result will also be the first skin absorption rate. The first preset molecular weight is 150~200, the first preset distribution parameter is -1, and the second preset distribution parameter is 4~5. In other words, even if the product is not for oral or mucous membrane contact, if the molecular weight (Mw) of its ingredients is not greater than 150~200, it indicates that it has a higher absorption capacity, especially when it penetrates through the skin or other biological barriers. Therefore, it is necessary to further confirm its distribution parameters. The distribution parameters are determined by the partition parameters (Partition). The coefficient (Mw) is calculated and represents the ratio of the activities of a substance in its undissociated form in two phases. It indicates the hydrophilicity of the substance to the organic phase. Ideally, when Mw is not greater than 180 and the partition parameter is between -1 and 4, it indicates that the absorption and effect of this component are better. Therefore, the most stringent safety limit must be adopted.

[0043] 2. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient is compared. If the molecular weight is between the first and second preset molecular weights, the distribution parameters of the ingredient are compared. If the distribution parameter is greater than the third preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is the second skin absorption rate. The first preset molecular weight is 150-200, the second preset molecular weight is 250-300, the third preset distribution parameter is 2, and the second skin absorption rate is 50%-99%. Preferably, when the product is not intended for contact with the mouth or mucous membranes, and the molecular weight of the ingredient is between 180 and 280, and the distribution parameter is greater than 2, the second skin absorption rate is 50%.

[0044] 3. When the category information does not match the preset application site, compare the molecular weight of the ingredient information. If the molecular weight is greater than the second preset molecular weight and less than the third preset molecular weight, compare the distribution parameters of the ingredient information. If the distribution parameter is less than the first preset distribution parameter or greater than the second preset distribution parameter, the result is adjusted to the third skin absorption rate. The third preset molecular weight is 1000 and the third skin absorption rate is 10%~49%. Preferably, when the product is not intended for contact with the mouth or mucous membranes, and the molecular weight of the ingredient is greater than 280 and less than 1000, and the distribution parameter is less than -1 or greater than 5, the third skin absorption rate is 10%.

[0045] 4. When the category information does not match the preset application site, compare the molecular weight of the ingredients. If the molecular weight is greater than the third preset molecular weight, the result is adjusted to the fourth skin absorption rate. The fourth skin absorption rate is 1% to 9%. In other words, even if the product is not intended to come into contact with the mouth or mucous membranes, if its molecular weight is greater than 1000, it means that its ingredient absorption rate is extremely poor. Therefore, a more lenient safety limit can be adopted. Ideally, the fourth skin absorption rate can be 1%.

[0046] As shown in step S5, after obtaining the evaluation data and adjustment results, the report generation unit 4 generates a corresponding evaluation report based on the evaluation data and adjustment results. In other words, it automatically generates corresponding adjustment results based on the evaluation data and when the evaluation data is abnormal, and generates evaluation report content based on the evaluation data and its adjustment results. In one embodiment, the evaluation report includes toxicological data and safety evaluation data. Preferably, the evaluation report content includes, but is not limited to, professional scientific opinions published by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), opinions or guidance issued by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR), detailed evaluation data, namely, the No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL), systemic exposure dosage (SED), and margin of safety (MOS), textual descriptions of ingredients, ingredient concentrations, skin absorption rates, etc. The evaluation report format can be set according to needs, such as the format specified in the Cosmetic Product Information File Creation Guidelines provided by the Food and Drug Administration of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, but is not limited to this.

[0047] Please refer to Figure 4, which is a schematic diagram of the platform architecture of one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, a cosmetic ingredient evaluation platform P of the present invention includes: an input interface 6 and a cosmetic ingredient evaluation system S, wherein the cosmetic ingredient evaluation system S is signal-connected to the input interface 6, and the implementation method is described in detail below:

[0048] Input interface 6 is for users to input category information, product information, and ingredient information of multiple products. Specifically, input interface 6 further includes import interface 61, execution interface 62, and maintenance interface 63. Import interface 61 is for inputting category information and product information, while the execution interface is for inputting execution commands to perform the evaluation process of category information and product information. Maintenance interface 63 is for adding or modifying the ingredient information of these products. In one embodiment, import interface 61 allows users to import files containing product information, which can be in EXCEL format, but is not limited to this.

[0049] After obtaining category information, product information, and ingredient information of multiple products through the input interface 6, the information is transmitted to the cosmetic ingredient evaluation system S for subsequent calculation. The operation of the cosmetic ingredient evaluation system S is the same as in the previous embodiment, so it will not be described in detail here.

[0050] To more clearly illustrate the implementation method of the platform, please refer to Figures 5A to 5F, which are schematic diagrams of the platform implementation of one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figures, firstly, as shown in Figure 5A, users can log in to the platform by entering a unique account and password. After logging in, users can select the import interface 61, the execution interface 62, and the maintenance interface 63 according to their needs. In one embodiment, as shown in Figure 5B, which demonstrates the implementation of the import interface 61, users can select the product category and then click on the Excel file containing product information to be imported. After importing, the content of the product information will be displayed in the preview box below.

[0051] In one embodiment, the execution interface 62 can be divided into two execution modes. One is to execute all, as shown in Figure 5C. By selecting to execute all, the execution command can be entered. At this time, the component information in multiple product information can be calculated simultaneously, and the export path can be specified, as well as the evaluation report format can be determined, thereby generating the corresponding specified report format. In the preview box in the execution interface 62, the MOS value corresponding to each product information can be displayed. When this value is abnormal, a red background can be used as a prompt, so that the user can intuitively notice whether the data is abnormal. The corresponding adjustment results can also be automatically displayed. If there are missing fields in the product information, the prompt information will also be displayed in the interface to prompt the user.

[0052] The second option is single-item execution, as shown in Figure 5D. When only a single product information data calculation is performed, single-item execution can be used. Input the product information to be calculated, select single-item execution, and input the execution command. At this time, the component information of the product information can be calculated separately, and the corresponding evaluation data after the product information calculation is displayed in the preview box.

[0053] In one embodiment, the maintenance interface 63 can be divided into two data maintenance methods. The first is the data addition interface, as shown in Figure 5E. When the product's ingredient information is not stored in the database 1, the data addition interface is entered, and the ingredient information is imported in Excel format. The user can also check the data in the preview box to confirm its correctness. The second is the data modification / query interface, as shown in Figure 5F. When the product's ingredient information is stored in the database 1, the user can modify or query the product's ingredient information by entering the INCI or its CAS number through the data modification / query interface to query the corresponding product ingredient information. To modify the ingredient information, the user can click on data modification to edit it, thus completing the database maintenance process.

[0054] In summary, the cosmetic ingredient evaluation method, system, and platform of one embodiment of the present invention can simplify the usage process through a simple input interface and generate corresponding adjustment results according to different products, so as to meet the evaluation needs of different products and produce corresponding evaluation reports.

[0055] However, the above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. Any simple equivalent changes and modifications made in accordance with the scope of the patent application and the description of the invention shall still fall within the scope of the patent of the present invention.

[0056] 1: Database 2: Input Unit 3: Processing Unit 4: Report Generation Unit 5: Maintenance Unit 6: Input Interface 61: Import Interface 62: Execution Interface 63: Maintenance Interface S: Cosmetic Ingredient Evaluation System S1: Steps S2: Steps S3: Steps S4: Steps S5: Steps P: Cosmetic Ingredient Evaluation Platform

Claims

1. A method for evaluating cosmetic ingredients, comprising the steps of: acquiring product information and category information of a product using an input unit; acquiring corresponding ingredient information using a processing unit based on the product information; performing calculations using the processing unit based on the ingredient information to generate evaluation data; comparing the evaluation data for anomalies using the processing unit, and if the evaluation data is anomaly, determining whether the category information matches a preset application site or a preset application route, and then performing calculations based on the evaluation data and the category information to generate a corresponding adjustment result; and generating an evaluation report using a report generation unit based on the evaluation data and the adjustment result; wherein, This category of information is selected from shampoo cosmetics, facial cleansing and makeup removal cosmetics, bath cosmetics, soaps, hair cosmetics, toners / oils / creams / lotions, fragrance cosmetics, antiperspirants and deodorants, lip cosmetics, topical cosmetics, eye cosmetics, nail cosmetics, teeth whitening products, non-medicinal toothpaste, mouthwash, and the preset application site is selected from the oral cavity and mucous membranes.

2. The cosmetic ingredient evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein, When the processing unit finds the evaluation data to be abnormal, the adjustment result includes one of the following: If the category information matches the preset application site, or if the category information does not match the preset application route, the molecular weight of the component information is compared. If the molecular weight is less than a first preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the component information is compared. If the distribution parameter is not less than a first preset distribution parameter and is not greater than a second preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a first skin absorption rate. If the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the component information is compared. If the molecular weight is not less than a first preset molecular weight and is not greater than a second preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the component information is compared. If the distribution parameter is greater than a third preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a second skin absorption rate. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the second preset molecular weight and less than a third preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is less than the first preset distribution parameter or greater than the second preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a third skin absorption rate. And when the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the third preset molecular weight, the adjustment result is a fourth skin absorption rate.

3. The cosmetic ingredient evaluation method according to claim 2, wherein, The first skin absorption rate is 100%, the second skin absorption rate is 50%~99%, the third skin absorption rate is 10%~49%, and the fourth skin absorption rate is 1%~9%.

4. In the cosmetic ingredient evaluation method according to claim 1, in the step of generating corresponding evaluation data by the calculation processing unit based on the ingredient information, the toxicological data of the ingredient information is compared to see if it is complete. If the toxicological data is incomplete, a prompt message is output to execute the toxicological data maintenance process.

5. A cosmetic ingredient evaluation system, comprising: a database storing ingredient information for one of a plurality of products; an input unit for acquiring category information and product information; a processing unit signal-connected to the database and the input unit, for acquiring the corresponding ingredient information based on the product information, and performing calculations based on the category information and the ingredient information to generate evaluation data and an adjustment result; and a report generation unit signal-connected to the processing unit, for generating an evaluation report based on the evaluation data and the adjustment result; wherein... The adjustment result includes one of the following: When the category information matches a preset application site, or when the category information does not match a preset route of application, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is less than a first preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is not less than a first preset distribution parameter and is not greater than a second preset distribution parameter, then the adjustment result is a first skin absorption rate. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is not less than a first preset molecular weight and is not greater than a second preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is greater than a third preset distribution parameter, then the adjustment result is a second skin absorption rate. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the second preset molecular weight and less than a third preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is less than the first preset distribution parameter or greater than the second preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a third skin absorption rate. And when the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the third preset molecular weight, the adjustment result is a fourth skin absorption rate. The category information is selected from shampoos, facial cleansers, body washes, soaps, hair care products, lotions / oils / creams, fragrances, antiperspirants, lip products, topical cosmetics, eye care products, nail care products, teeth whitening products, non-medicinal toothpastes, and mouthwashes. The preset application site is selected from the oral cavity and mucous membranes.

6. The cosmetic ingredient evaluation system according to claim 5, wherein, The first skin absorption rate is 100%, the second skin absorption rate is 50%~99%, the third skin absorption rate is 10%~49%, and the fourth skin absorption rate is 1%~9%.

7. The cosmetic ingredient evaluation system according to claim 5, comprising: a maintenance unit connected to the database signal to add or modify the ingredient information of the products.

8. A cosmetic ingredient evaluation platform, comprising: an input interface for inputting category information, product information, and ingredient information of a plurality of products; and a cosmetic ingredient evaluation system signal-connected to the input interface, comprising: a database for acquiring and storing the ingredient information corresponding to the products; an input unit for acquiring the category information and the product information; a processing unit signal-connected to the database and the input unit for acquiring the corresponding ingredient information based on the product information, and performing calculations based on the category information and the ingredient information to generate evaluation data and an adjustment result; and a report generation unit signal-connected to the processing unit for generating an evaluation report based on the evaluation data and the adjustment result; wherein... The adjustment result includes one of the following: When the category information matches a preset application site, or when the category information does not match a preset route of application, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is less than a first preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is not less than a first preset distribution parameter and is not greater than a second preset distribution parameter, then the adjustment result is a first skin absorption rate, which is 100%. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is not less than a first preset molecular weight and is not greater than a second preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is greater than a third preset distribution parameter, then the adjustment result is a second skin absorption rate, which is 50% to 99%. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the second preset molecular weight and less than a third preset molecular weight, the distribution parameter of the ingredient information is compared. If the distribution parameter is less than the first preset distribution parameter or greater than the second preset distribution parameter, the adjustment result is a third skin absorption rate of 10% to 49%. When the category information does not match the preset application site, the molecular weight of the ingredient information is compared. If the molecular weight is greater than the third preset molecular weight, the adjustment result is a fourth skin absorption rate of 1% to 9%. The information in this category is selected from shampoo cosmetics, facial cleansing and makeup removal cosmetics, bath cosmetics, soaps, hair cosmetics, lotions / oils / creams, fragrance cosmetics, antiperspirants and deodorants, lip cosmetics, topical cosmetics, eye cosmetics, nail cosmetics, teeth whitening products, non-medicinal toothpaste, mouthwash, and the preset application site is selected from the oral cavity and mucous membranes.

9. The cosmetic ingredient evaluation platform described in claim 8, wherein, The input interface includes an import interface, an execution interface, and a maintenance interface. The import interface is for inputting category information and product information, the execution interface is for inputting an execution command to perform the evaluation process of the category information and product information, and the maintenance interface is for adding or modifying the ingredient information of these products.