Manufacturing method for semiconductor light-receiving element for optical communication

A high-temperature energizing process stabilizes strain distribution and electric field uniformity in semiconductor photodetectors with digital alloy structures, addressing noise issues and enhancing reception sensitivity, thus obviating the need for costly power-hungry compensation circuits.

WO2026120728A1PCT designated stage Publication Date: 2026-06-11MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
WO · WO
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
Filing Date
2024-12-04
Publication Date
2026-06-11

Smart Images

  • Figure JP2024042869_11062026_PF_FP_ABST
    Figure JP2024042869_11062026_PF_FP_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

In this manufacturing method for a semiconductor light-receiving element for optical communication according to the present disclosure, a semiconductor light-receiving element (100) for optical communication is provided with a semiconductor substrate (1), an n-type semiconductor layer (2) formed on the semiconductor substrate (1), a digital alloy structure multiplication layer (3) formed on the n-type semiconductor layer (2), a p-type electric field relaxation layer (4) formed on the digital alloy structure multiplication layer (3), a light absorption layer (5) formed on the p-type electric field relaxation layer (4), and a p-type semiconductor layer (7) formed on the light absorption layer (5). This manufacturing method comprises at least a step for applying a reverse voltage to the semiconductor light-receiving element (100) for optical communication having at least the digital alloy structure multiplication layer (3), within a range of 0.2-100 hours.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Method for manufacturing semiconductor photodetectors for optical communications

[0001] This disclosure relates to a method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communications.

[0002] With the advancement of digital transformation, which utilizes digital information, there has been remarkable development in communication networks that exchange digital information with each other and in data centers that store and process data. Optical communication is used for communication networks and communication within data centers. In recent years, optical communication has made remarkable progress in terms of speed and capacity. In the midst of the advancement of optical communication, photodiodes (PDs) and avalanche photodiodes (APDs) that can obtain high reception sensitivity are required as optical communication receivers.

[0003] In access networks connecting to optical communication subscribers, the Passive Optical Network (PON) is the primary method used. PON systems started with G(E)-PON systems that transmit signals at 1-2 Gbps, and it is expected that 10G-EPON systems and XG-PON systems that transmit signals at 10 Gbps will increase in the future.

[0004] Furthermore, the ITU-T (International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is considering the 50G-PON system, a next-generation high-speed PON system, and it is expected that 50Gbps-class transmission will be put into practical use in access networks in the future.

[0005] Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho 63-177076, Japanese Patent Publication No. 2021-135077, Japanese Patent Publication No. Hei 3-116791, Japanese Patent Publication No. 2001-196623, International Publication No. 2006 / 080153, Japanese Patent No. 7471550

[0006] Jiyuan Zheng et. al, “Digital Alloy InAlAs Avalanche Photodiodes”, JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 36, NO. 17, SEPTEMBER 1, pp. 3580-3585, 2018P. J. Hambleton, B. K. Ng, S. A. Plimmer, J. P. R. David, and G. J. Rees, “The Effects of Nonlocal Impact Ionization on the Speed ​​of Avalanche Photodiodes” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 50, NO. 2, pp. 347, FEBRUARY, 2003

[0007] In an APD (Advanced Photovoltaic Display), electrons and holes are accelerated and ionized, i.e., multiplied, in the multiplication layer where a high electric field is applied. When both electrons and holes are ionized, the multiplication noise increases. On the other hand, when only electrons are ionized, the noise is low. The value obtained by dividing the ionization rate of holes β by the ionization rate of electrons α, β / α, is called the ionization rate ratio k. The closer the ionization rate ratio k approaches zero, the lower the noise becomes.

[0008] Numerous attempts have been reported to bring the ionization ratio k closer to zero. In recent years, for example, as described in Non-Patent Document 1, it has been reported that by applying a digital alloy structure, in which InAs layers and AlAs layers are stacked with a period of several atomic layers, to the multiplication layer of an APD, hole ionization is suppressed and the ionization ratio k approaches zero, resulting in a low-noise APD.

[0009] The lattice constants of InAs and AlAs differ by +3% and -3%, respectively, from the lattice constant of InP used in the substrate. In other words, the InAs layer and AlAs layer experience crystal strains of +3% and -3%, respectively, relative to the InP substrate. Normally, if there is a crystal strain of ±3% relative to the substrate, dislocations will occur. However, in a digital alloy structure in which InAs and AlAs layers are stacked with a period of several atomic layers, the magnitude of the strains in InAs and AlAs are almost the same, and they cancel each other out, so no dislocations occur.

[0010] In a digital alloy structure, ideally, two layers with different compositions are crystallized with the same number of atomic layers and a uniform and regular strain. However, in reality, even when InAs layers and AlAs layers are periodically stacked by two atomic layers each, due to the influence of disturbances such as the in-wafer distribution of the crystal growth temperature, the strain distribution of the underlying layer, the unevenness and dislocations at the atomic layer level, a local strain distribution occurs in the digital alloy structure. This local strain distribution affects the band structure and the effective masses of electrons and holes, and the ionization rates of electrons and holes change. Originally, the distance between each atom forming the crystal lattice is uniform within the crystal plane. Here, the local strain distribution means that the distance between each atom is locally larger or smaller than the average value. The local range is from about 0.5 nm (roughly the size of a single lattice) to several micrometers.

[0011] Also, as described above, the ionization rates of electrons and holes and the ionization rate ratio k are affected by the strain distribution. When a strain distribution on the atomic layer number scale occurs, the ionization rate ratio k becomes larger compared to the case of an ideal digital alloy structure multiplication layer, so the multiplication noise deteriorates. When the multiplication noise increases, the signal-to-noise ratio decreases, and the problem that the reception sensitivity of the APD deteriorates occurs.

[0012] In addition, in an APD, there are also problems such as non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in the multiplication layer. The non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in the multiplication layer are respectively caused by the distribution of dopants and the activation of originally inactive dopants. In particular, in an APD with a digital alloy structure as the multiplication layer, since it is originally extremely low-noise, the non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in the multiplication layer become factors that deteriorate the noise.

[0013] Noise generated in semiconductor photodetectors for optical communications, i.e., deterioration of reception sensitivity, has a significant impact on the system. In next-generation 50G-PON systems, the reception sensitivity of semiconductor photodetectors for optical communications tends to be insufficient. For this reason, it is being considered to install a digital bandwidth compensation circuit using a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) after the APD in the Optical Network Unit (ONU), i.e., the subscriber-side receiving device.

[0014] Furthermore, in the Optical Line Terminal (OLT), that is, the receiving equipment on the central office side, a Semiconductor Optical Amplifier (SOA) is required to compensate for the insufficient receiving sensitivity of the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication. Alternatively, an SOA may be integrated into the Electro-absorption Modulated Laser Diode (EML) on the transmitting side of the ONU to increase the optical output.

[0015] However, DSPs and SOAs consume very high power, which increases costs, raising concerns that the replacement of existing PON systems with 50G-PON systems will not progress.

[0016] In existing PON systems other than next-generation high-speed PON systems, increasing the number of branches of the optical signal output from the OLT is being considered to reduce costs. However, even in this case, it is necessary to integrate the SOA into the EML on the transmitting side of the OLT and ONU to increase the optical output, which leads to problems such as increased power consumption of the transmitter and increased costs.

[0017] As described above, in order to compensate for the limitations of the receiving sensitivity of semiconductor photodetectors for optical communications, transceivers have been designed by incorporating expensive and power-hungry DSPs and SOAs into ONUs and OLTs. However, this results in increased power consumption and increased costs. For this reason, APDs (Advanced Photodetectors) with a digital alloy structure as the multiplier layer are expected to dramatically improve the receiving sensitivity of semiconductor photodetectors for optical communications.

[0018] In APDs that use a digital alloy structure as the multiplier layer, the challenge is to reduce and stabilize the multiplier noise by improving the distortion distribution, non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in the digital alloy structure multiplier layer, which are factors that worsen reception sensitivity.

[0019] This disclosure was made to resolve the above-mentioned problems and aims to provide a manufacturing method that enables the stable fabrication of semiconductor photodetectors for optical communications that have low amplification noise, i.e., high receiving sensitivity.

[0020] A method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communications according to this disclosure comprises at least the step of applying a reverse voltage to a semiconductor photodetector for optical communications having at least a digital alloy structure multiplier layer for a period of 0.2 hours or more and 100 hours or less.

[0021] The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to this disclosure provides the effect that, in a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, by performing an energizing process, the deterioration of the ionization ratio caused by the strain distribution and non-uniformity and instability of the electric field within the digital alloy structure multiplier layer can be reduced, thereby reducing multiplication noise and enabling the easy manufacture of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication with high receiving sensitivity.

[0022] This is a cross-sectional view showing the device structure of a surface-incident APD having a multiplier layer made of a digital alloy structure, which is an example of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication. This is a cross-sectional view showing the device structure of a surface-incident APD having a multiplier layer made of a digital alloy structure, which is another example of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication. This is a figure showing the measurement results of local strain in an InAlAs random alloy structure layer. This is a figure showing the measurement results of local strain in an InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure layer. This is a schematic diagram showing discretely occurring local strain in the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer of a surface-incident APD. This is a figure showing the electric field dependence of electron Dead Space in the InAlAs random alloy structure multiplier layer and the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer. This is a schematic diagram showing a high-temperature energizing method for reducing noise in an APD having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer in a manufacturing method for a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1. This figure shows the effect of improving the ionization ratio k of the APD by the high-temperature energizing process in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1. This figure shows an example of the reverse voltage dependence of the multiplication factor M in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1. This figure shows an example of the reverse voltage dependence of 1 / multiplication factor M in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1. This is a schematic diagram showing a method of arranging APDs in parallel in the voltage application method of the high-temperature energizing process in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1. This is a schematic diagram showing a method of arranging APDs in series in the voltage application method of the high-temperature energizing process in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1. This figure shows the energizing circuit used in the light incidence energizing process in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 3. This figure shows the reverse voltage dependence of the photocurrent and darkcurrent of the APD in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 3. This figure shows the forward current dependence of the temperature rise near the multiplication layer of the APD. This is a diagram showing the manufacturing flow in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiments 1 to 4. This is a schematic diagram for explaining prober energization in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiments 1 to 4.

[0023] Embodiment 1. When explaining the manufacturing method of the semiconductor light-receiving element for optical communication according to Embodiment 1, the semiconductor light-receiving element for optical communication, which is the object of the manufacturing method, will be described below.

[0024] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view showing the element structure of a surface-incident type APD 100 having a multiplication layer with a digital alloy structure, which is an example of a semiconductor light-receiving element for optical communication.

[0025] The surface-incident type APD 100 includes an n-type InP substrate 1, and an n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2 that is sequentially formed on the n-type InP substrate 1 and has a carrier concentration of 1×10 18 cm -3 or more and 5×10 18 cm -3 or less and a layer thickness of 0.01 μm or more and 1.0 μm or less, an i-type AlAs layer (for example, a layer thickness of 2 atomic layers, about 0.6 nm), an i-type InAs layer (for example, a layer thickness of 2 atomic layers, about 0.6 nm), and a multiplication layer 3 (hereinafter referred to as the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3) formed by alternately laminating a plurality of times an i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure composed of, a p-type InP electric field relaxation layer 4 having a carrier concentration of 1×10 16 cm -3 or more and 5×10 18 cm -3 or less and a layer thickness of 10 nm or more and 70 nm or less, an i-type InGaAs optical absorption layer 5 having a layer thickness of 0.1 μm or more and 2.0 μm or less, an i-type InAlGaAs / InAlAs graded layer 6, a p-type InP window layer 7 having a layer thickness of a p-type InGaAs contact layer 8, an n-type electrode 31 formed on the back side of the n-type InP substrate 1, and a p-type electrode 32 formed on the p-type InGaAs contact layer 8. Here, the n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2 is also referred to as an n-type semiconductor layer. Instead of the n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2, an n-type InP buffer layer may be used. Here, the i-type means a semiconductor having a carrier concentration of 5×10 17 cm -3 or less.

[0026] The n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2 may have either a random alloy structure or a digital alloy structure. Silicon (Si), which is difficult to diffuse, is optimal as the n-type dopant for the n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2. This is to prevent n-type impurities from diffusing from the n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2 to the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3, which would cause the digital alloy structure to become disordered. Here, disorder refers to the phenomenon where the compositions of each layer in the digital alloy structure mix together, resulting in a random alloy structure with an average composition.

[0027] As described above, the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3 is composed of semiconductor layers stacked alternately in the order of AlAs layers (layer thickness of 2 atomic layers, approximately 0.6 nm) and InAs layers (layer thickness of 2 atomic layers, approximately 0.6 nm). However, the layer thickness of the AlAs layer and the InAs layer can be in the range of 2 to 6 atomic layers, respectively. The reason for limiting the layer thickness to 6 atomic layers or less is that it is desirable that the stacked structure of the AlAs layer and the InAs layer does not function as a quantum well structure.

[0028] Furthermore, the number of atomic layers in each layer of the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3 is preferably between 2 and 4 atomic layers, with 2 atomic layers being optimal. This is because the thinner the atomic layer thickness of each layer, the greater the effect of reducing the ionization ratio k by the digital alloy structure.

[0029] Considering the affinity with the InAlAs constituting the n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2, it is preferable to increase the thickness of only the first AlAs layer of the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3 to 3 atomic layers or more. Alternatively, the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3 may be laminated by alternately forming InAs layers and AlAs layers in that order.

[0030] The conductivity type of the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3 is i-type, and the carrier concentration is 1 × 10⁻⁶. 17 cm -3 The following is an example. However, as a conductivity type for the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer, the carrier concentration is 5 × 10 18cm -3 It may be of type p or type n as follows:

[0031] To increase the dead space effect in the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3, the layer thickness of the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3 is preferably in the range of 40 nm to 170 nm. However, considering the typical variation of 20% in layer thickness during the fabrication of semiconductor photodetectors for optical communication, the layer thickness of the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3 is preferably in the range of 50 nm to 140 nm.

[0032] Here, we will explain the dead space effect. The distance that electrons or holes can travel without ionizing within a multiplier layer to which a high electric field is applied is called the dead space. Normally, since the effective mass of holes is larger than that of electrons, holes are less likely to ionize, and therefore the dead space for holes is larger. If the thickness of the multiplier layer is made thinner than the dead space for holes, only electrons can ionize, so the ionization ratio k becomes smaller, resulting in lower noise. This phenomenon is called the dead space effect. Note that if the multiplier layer becomes too thin, the tunnel current increases and the noise worsens, so there is a lower limit to the optimal thickness of the multiplier layer.

[0033] In addition to the multiplier layer composed of an InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure, an InAlGaAs digital alloy structure, in which InAlYGa(1-y)As (layer thickness of 2 to 6 atomic layers, Al composition ratio: Y) and InAlzGa(1-z)As (layer thickness of 2 to 6 atomic layers, Al composition ratio: Z) are alternately stacked, can also be applied as a multiplier layer according to this disclosure. Furthermore, a digital alloy structure made of InAlAsSb, a material system to which antimony (Sb) has been added, can also be applied as a multiplier layer according to this disclosure.

[0034] As described above, the carrier concentration in the p-type InP field relaxation layer 4 is 1 × 10⁻⁶. 16 cm -3 The above 5 x 10 18 cm -3The following conditions apply, and the layer thickness is preferably in the range of 10 nm to 70 nm. Examples of p-type dopants for the p-type InP field relaxation layer 4 include beryllium (Be), zinc (Zn), and carbon (C).

[0035] Furthermore, the field relaxation layer does not necessarily have to be composed of p-type InP. In other words, the field relaxation layer may be a p-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure or a p-type InAlAs random alloy structure. However, if the dopant contained in the p-type InP field relaxation layer 4 diffuses into the adjacent i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3, there is a risk that the digital alloy structure will become disordered and transform into a random alloy structure of InAlAs.

[0036] As mentioned above, the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3 is thin, with a thickness of approximately 100 nm, and is therefore highly susceptible to disorder caused by dopant diffusion. For this reason, in the case of the p-type InP field relaxation layer 4, Be, which is less prone to diffusion, is the optimal choice for the p-type dopant. On the other hand, when using p-type InAlAs as a constituent material for the field relaxation layer, Zn is the optimal choice for the p-type dopant.

[0037] By providing a layer with a thickness of 0.1 μm or less, made of InAlGaAs or InGaAsP having an intermediate bandgap value between the two, between the p-type InP field relaxation layer 4 and the i-type InGaAs light absorption layer 5, it is possible to prevent the accumulation of electrons and holes at the heterojunction interface. The conductivity type of the InGaAs light absorption layer may be n-type or p-type.

[0038] Furthermore, for a similar purpose, a layer made of InAlGaAs or InGaAsP having an intermediate bandgap value between the two, with a thickness of 0.1 μm or less, may be provided between the i-type InGaAs light absorption layer 5 and the p-type InAlAs layer. The p-type InGaAs contact layer 8 has an outer periphery that is smaller in area than the multiplication layer.

[0039] In the example of the device structure of the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication shown in Figure 1, an i-type InAlGaAs / InAlAs graded layer 6 is formed by alternately stacking two types of i-type InAlGaAs layers with different compositions multiple times on an i-type InGaAs light absorption layer 5. The conductivity type of the i-type InAlGaAs / InAlAs graded layer 6 may be p-type or n-type instead of i-type. Also, a p-type InAlAs window layer may be used instead of the p-type InP window layer 7.

[0040] In the surface-incident APD 100 having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer shown in Figure 1, the n-type InP substrate 1 side is designated as n-type, but it is also possible to reverse the vertical positions of the p-type semiconductor layer and the n-type semiconductor layer. Figure 2 is a cross-sectional view showing the device structure of a surface-incident APD 110 having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, which is another example of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication.

[0041] The surface-incident APD 110, having a multiplier layer made of a digital alloy structure, is sequentially formed on an Fe-doped semi-insulating InP substrate 1a, with a carrier concentration of 1 × 10⁻¹⁶ 16 cm -3 The above 5 x 10 18 cm -3 A p-type InAlAs or p-type InP buffer layer 7a having a thickness of 0.1 μm to 1.0 μm, an i-type InAlGaAs / InAlAs graded layer 6a, an i-type InGaAs light absorption layer 5a having a thickness of 0.1 μm to 2.0 μm, and a carrier concentration of 1 × 10 16 cm -3 The above 5 x 10 18 cm -3 The following components may be configured in order: a p-type InP field relaxation layer 4a having a thickness of 10 nm to 70 nm, an i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3a, an n-type InP window layer 2a having a thickness of 0.1 μm to 3.0 μm, an n-type InGaAs contact layer 8a, a p-type electrode 32a formed on a p-type InAlAs or p-type InP buffer layer 7a, and an n-type electrode 31a formed on an n-type InGaAs contact layer 8a. The p-type InAlAs or p-type InP buffer layer 7a is also referred to as a p-type semiconductor layer.

[0042] <Method for Manufacturing an APD Having a Digital Alloy Structure Multiplier Layer> A surface-incident APD 100 having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, which is an example of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1, can be realized on an n-type InP substrate 1 using metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) or molecular beam epitaxial growth (MBE). The method for manufacturing a surface-incident APD 100 having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer according to Embodiment 1 is described below.

[0043] Using the MOVPE method or MBE method, a layer with a carrier concentration of 1 × 10⁻¹⁶ is applied to the n-type InP substrate 1 with a thickness of 0.01 μm to 1 μm. 18 cm -3 The above 5 x 10 18 cm -3 The following n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2 is grown as a crystal.

[0044] An i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3 is grown on an n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2. In other words, an i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer 3 is formed by alternately growing AlAs layers (with a thickness of 2 atomic layers, approximately 0.6 nm) and InAs layers (with a thickness of 2 atomic layers, approximately 0.6 nm) on the n-type InAlAs buffer layer 2.

[0045] On the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure, the multiplier layer 3 has a layer thickness of 10 nm to 70 nm and a carrier concentration of 1 × 10⁻¹⁶ 16 cm -3 The above 5 x 10 18 cm -3 The following p-type InP field relaxation layer 4 is grown as a crystal.

[0046] On the p-type InP field relaxation layer 4, an i-type InGaAs light absorption layer 5 with a thickness of 0.1 μm to 2 μm, an i-type InAlGaAs / InAlAs graded layer 6, a p-type InP window layer 7 with a thickness of 0.1 μm to 3 μm, and a p-type InGaAs contact layer 8 are sequentially grown as crystals. The InAlGaAs / InAlAs graded layer may be n-type or p-type. Also, a p-type InAlAs window layer may be used instead of the p-type InP window layer 7.

[0047] After the crystal growth is complete, a p-type electrode 32 is formed on the surface of the p-type InGaAs contact layer 8, and an n-type electrode 31 is formed on the back surface of the n-type InP substrate 1.

[0048] In the case of the surface-incident APD 100 shown in Figure 1, an anti-reflective coating film 40 is applied to the incident surface of the APD on the chip surface. Light is incident on the i-type InGaAs light absorption layer 5 by passing through the anti-reflective coating film 40 from a direction perpendicular to it. The diameter of the light-receiving part of the APD when it is circular, or the size of the long side when the light-receiving part of the APD is rectangular, is in the range of 5 μm to 1 mm.

[0049] <Noise Reduction and Noise Stabilization of APD Using Digital Alloy Structure as Multiplier Layer> In the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1, the manufacturing process for reducing and stabilizing the multiplication noise of an APD having a characteristic digital alloy structure multiplier layer is described below.

[0050] <Local Strain Distribution in Digital Alloy Structure Multiplier Layer> First, the local strain distribution within the multiplier layer will be explained. Figures 3 and 4 show the amount of strain in the stacking direction (perpendicular to the wafer surface) for the InAlAs random alloy structure layer and the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure layer, respectively. Figures 3 and 4 are measurement results using the GPA (Geometric Phase Analysis) method with a TEM (Transmission Electron Microscope).

[0051] The local strain distribution ΔSr in the InAlAs random alloy structure layer shown in Figure 3 is 0.02. Here, the local strain distribution is the deviation from the average value of the distance between each atom. Specifically, if Sa is the average value of the distance between atoms in the crystal layer, and Sx is the distance between atoms at a certain location (locally), then ΔSr = (Sx - Sa) / Sa. In the case of the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure layer, the average value Sa of the distance S1 between adjacent In atoms and As atoms and the distance S2 between adjacent Al atoms is expressed as Sa = (S1 + S2) / 2.

[0052] On the other hand, in the case of the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure layer shown in Figure 4, the lattice constants (distance between adjacent atoms, or size of a single lattice) differ by ±3% between the InAs layer and the AlAs layer, so the amount of strain fluctuates periodically. What is noteworthy here is that even when comparing AlAs layers with each other, the local strain distribution ΔSr is large, at about 0.04.

[0053] Thus, in the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure layer, if the amount of local strain distribution is large, the original band structure of the digital alloy structure layer is not formed, resulting in a large ionization ratio k and a deterioration of multiplication noise. Furthermore, an increase in local strain distribution also causes a local distribution of the multiplication factor.

[0054] Figure 5 schematically represents the discrete local strain distribution within the i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer 3 of the surface-incident APD 100. As shown by the local strain distribution schematically represented by x in Figure 5, discrete local strains exist within the InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer.

[0055] In APD, the amplification noise is M (2+x) It is approximately proportional to , where M is the multiplication factor and x is the excess noise figure. The excess noise figure x is a value in the range of 0.2 to 0.5. If the excess noise figure x is 0.2, the multiplication noise is M 2.2 It is proportional to the ratio. When the electric field distribution within the light-receiving surface of the APD is uniform, if the amplification factor M is 8, the amplification noise is 97 times (= 8) higher than the amplification noise when the amplification factor M is 1. 2.2 )

[0056] On the other hand, if a uniform electric field is not applied within the plane of the multiplier layer, and if a distribution of the multiplier is generated due to localized distortion, the multiplier noise of the APD increases. For example, an electric field distribution and a multiplier distribution are generated within the light-receiving surface of the APD due to a dopant or localized distortion. If the multiplier M is 10 in half the area of ​​the multiplier layer and 6 in the remaining half, the averaged multiplier M will be 8.

[0057] Therefore, the multiplication noise is 10 2.2 and 6 2.2 This averages out to 105 times the amplification noise when the amplification factor M is 1. In other words, if the electric field distribution is non-uniform within the amplification layer, even if the averaged amplification factor M is 8, the amplification noise increases by approximately 8%, from 97 times to 105 times, compared to when the amplification factor M is 1.

[0058] <Method for reducing noise> To ensure uniform and stable multiplication by stabilizing the local strain distribution unique to the multiplication layer of the digital alloy structure, it is effective to pass current (electrons and holes) in the reverse direction of the pn junction of the APD at high temperature. This is because when electrons and holes collide with atoms, i.e., the lattice, the unstable and localized lattice strain is stabilized, and the amount of strain in each atomic layer becomes uniform. The kinetic energy (m·v) of electrons and holes colliding with the lattice 2 The higher the ( / 2) value, the greater the effect of stabilizing local lattice strain. Here, m represents the effective mass of electrons or holes, and v represents the velocity of electrons or holes.

[0059] In the dead space within the multiplier layer, the energy of the moving carriers is not consumed by ionization, so the carrier velocity increases. For example, Non-Patent Literature 2 shows that the effective carrier velocity in a multiplier layer with a thickness of 200 nm increases by as much as 169%.

[0060] Figure 6 shows the electric field dependence of the electron dead space in the InAlAs multiplier layer. As shown in Figure 6, the dead space becomes longer in the digital alloy structure multiplier layer, which increases the kinetic energy of electrons and holes, resulting in a unique effect in eliminating strain instability. Furthermore, it is thought that this effect can be achieved in a short time by increasing the heat treatment temperature when applying current. In other words, by performing a high-temperature current application process on the APD, it is possible to reduce the noise of the APD, that is, to reduce the ionization ratio k.

[0061] <Effect of High-Temperature Current Application Process> The inventors actually verified the effect of reducing the ionization ratio k by applying a reverse voltage to an APD having an InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer at a high heat treatment temperature and passing a current through it. The InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplier layer of the wafer from which the test sample APD was fabricated was known in advance through TEM analysis to have a relatively large amount of disorder in the interatomic distances of InAs and AlAs, meaning that an APD in which a local strain distribution is thought to be occurring was used.

[0062] As shown in Figure 7, the inside of the energizing tank 50 was kept under a nitrogen atmosphere, and the temperature inside the energizing tank 50 was controlled by T (°C). A voltage Vapd (V) was applied to the APD from a voltage source, and a current Iapd flowed in the reverse direction across the pn junction of the APD. A resistor R was connected in series between the APD and the voltage source to minimize the change in current Iapd even when the IV characteristics of the APD changed.

[0063] For APDs that underwent a high-temperature energization process, the ionization ratio k was calculated from the measured multiplication noise. The relationship between the ionization ratio k and the multiplication noise is expressed by the following equation (1). Note that the multiplication noise is defined as the mean square of the current amplitude of the shot noise. Multiplication Noise = 2qIBM 2 F (1)

[0064] In equation (1), q represents the elementary charge, I represents the average current flowing through the multiplier layer, B represents the frequency band, M represents the multiplier ratio, and F represents the excess noise coefficient. The relationship between the excess noise figure x and the excess noise coefficient F is expressed by the following equation (2): F = M x (2)

[0065] In the case of electron injection, the excess noise coefficient F is correlated with the ionization ratio k and the multiplication factor M, as shown in equation (3) below: F = M[1 - (1 - k)((M - 1) / M] 2 (3) Using equations (1) and (2) above, the ionization ratio k of APD was calculated.

[0066] Figure 8 shows the effect of the high-temperature energization process on improving the ionization ratio k of APDs. When the high-temperature energization process is not performed, the ionization ratio k is 0.20 (sample size: n=7). On the other hand, when the high-temperature energization process is performed, the ionization ratio k improves to 0.12 (sample size: n=11). Note that the ionization ratio k is the value when the multiplication factor M is 5. The effect of the high-temperature energization process was verified with multiple APDs. As shown in Figure 8, the variance value σ of the ionization ratio k is sufficiently small, and the difference in the ionization ratio k between the presence and absence of the high-temperature energization process is statistically significant.

[0067] In the case of APDs using an InAlAs random alloy structure as the multiplier layer, the ionization ratio k is 0.20 regardless of whether or not a high-temperature energizing process is performed. Therefore, the improvement in the ionization ratio k due to the high-temperature energizing process can be said to be a unique effect that only appears in APDs using an InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure as the multiplier layer.

[0068] <Temperature conditions for the high-temperature energizing process> The heat treatment temperature in the high-temperature energizing process is preferably within the range of 85°C to 280°C. 85°C is the maximum temperature during actual use, and 280°C is the upper limit temperature to keep it below the melting point of the solder used during mounting. A heat treatment temperature within the range of 120°C to 200°C is even more preferable. 120°C is the temperature at which, when the activation energy is 0.8 eV, 10 times the acceleration compared to 85°C can be obtained, allowing for a reduction in energizing time. 200°C is the upper limit temperature at which no deterioration of the electrodes occurs.

[0069] <Voltage conditions for the high-temperature energization process> Figure 9 is a diagram showing an example of the reverse voltage dependence of the multiplication factor M in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1. Figure 10 is a diagram showing an example of the reverse voltage dependence of 1 / (multiplication factor M) in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1.

[0070] As optimal voltage conditions during the high-temperature energization process, the reverse voltage of the APD must be greater than or equal to the reach-through voltage in order for electrons to be efficiently injected into the multiplier layer. Furthermore, the reverse voltage of the APD must be less than or equal to 1.1 times the breakdown voltage in order to prevent excessive current flow and burnout of the APD.

[0071] Figure 10 shows the range of suitable applied voltages, i.e., energizing voltages, during the high-temperature energizing process. An applied voltage of 0.9 to 1.1 times the breakdown voltage at the energizing temperature is even more preferable. This is because energizing can be completed in a short time and degradation due to overcurrent can be prevented. Here, reach-through voltage is the voltage at which the multiplier M is approximately 1.1 times or more. Breakdown voltage is the voltage at which the dark current increases rapidly. Specifically, breakdown voltage is defined as the voltage at which the multiplier is 8 times or 1.1 to 1.2 times the voltage at which the multiplier is 8 times, or the voltage at which the multiplier M is 20 times, or the voltage at which the dark current is 100 μA or more.

[0072] <Voltage Application Method for High-Temperature Current Supply Process> To apply a voltage of 0.9 to 1.1 times the breakdown voltage, a constant current power supply (voltage source and resistor, or constant current source) is used to control the current density (A / m). 2 ) 3.2 × 10 2 A / m 2 from 3.2 x 10 6 A / m 2 The current may be set to a value within the specified range and power may be supplied. Furthermore, pulsed voltage application is also acceptable instead of continuous voltage application. Note: 3.2 × 10 2 A / m 2 This refers to the current density equivalent to 1 mA at a light-receiving diameter of 1 mmΦ on the light-receiving surface of the APD, which is 3.2 × 10⁻⁶. 6 A / m 2 This refers to a current density equivalent to 1 mA at the light-receiving diameter of 10 μmΦ on the light-receiving surface of the APD.

[0073] Figure 11 is a schematic diagram showing a method of applying voltage in the high-temperature energizing process in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1, in which APDs are arranged in parallel. Figure 12 is a schematic diagram showing a method of applying voltage in the high-temperature energizing process, in which APDs are arranged in series.

[0074] As a voltage application circuit for the high-temperature energization process, a preferred method is to connect the APDs in parallel with respect to the power supply, as shown in Figure 11, and insert a resistor R between the power supply and each APD. By using a constant voltage source for the power supply and setting the resistor R to a high value within the range of 1 kΩ to 1 MΩ, it is possible to supply approximately the same current to each APD even if the breakdown voltages of each APD are different. In other words, by connecting a high-resistance resistor R in series with each APD, it is the same as connecting a separate constant current source to each APD. On the other hand, as shown in Figure 12, it is also possible to supply the same current value to all APDs by connecting multiple APDs in series with the power supply.

[0075] <Specific Conditions for the Energizing Time in the High-Temperature Energizing Process> The energizing time in the high-temperature energizing process is preferably the time required for the breakdown voltage or dark current fluctuations of the APD to stabilize. The stabilization time may be set by performing the same energizing time twice, such that the fluctuations in the breakdown voltage or dark current before and after the first energizing are smaller than the fluctuations before and after the second energizing.

[0076] The high-temperature energizing process is preferably within the range of 0.2 hours to 100 hours, which is sufficient to stabilize the rapid fluctuations in the dark current of the APD. It is even more preferable to set the energizing time within the range of 0.5 hours to 48 hours. The 0.5 hours is the time required to stabilize the temperature of the energizing chamber, and the 48 hours is a constraint time considering productivity. Furthermore, the energizing time can be shortened by applying voltage during the heating and cooling of the energizing chamber 50.

[0077] <Method for Confirming the Effect of the High-Temperature Energization Process> When applying the high-temperature energization process to the manufacturing of APDs, it is necessary to appropriately monitor the effect of the high-temperature energization process to exclude APDs that are thought to have high noise levels. Measuring the multiplication noise of each APD individually is inefficient, so an alternative method is needed. An alternative method is described below.

[0078] One example of such a method is to determine that an APD (Advanced Processing Device) is defective if the changes in breakdown voltage Vbr and dark current Id before and after the high-temperature energizing process are several times larger than the average values, or if the changes in breakdown voltage Vbr and dark current Id do not decrease even after repeated high-temperature energizing. This may indicate the presence of a fatal defect in the digital alloy structure multiplier layer.

[0079] The specific method for determining this is to monitor ΔVbr, which represents the change in breakdown voltage Vbr, or ΔId, which represents the change in dark current Id. Vbr and ΔId are calculated using the following equations (4) and (5), respectively: ΔVbr = Vbr after energization / Vbr before energization (4) ΔId = Id after energization / Id before energization (5)

[0080] As an example of criteria for determining whether APD is good or bad, the following criteria can be used: A < ΔVbr < B (6) C < ΔId < D (7)

[0081] The criteria for judgment are set considering the variance σ of ΔVbr and ΔId. For example, for ΔVbr, A = ΔVbr - 2σ and B = ΔVbr + 2σ can be set, where σ represents the variance of ΔVbr. For ΔId, C = ΔId - 2σ and D = ΔId + 2σ can be set, where σ represents the variance of ΔId. As another example of a criterion, the correlation between the results of long-term reliability tests and ΔVbr and ΔId can be examined and used to set the criteria.

[0082] <Effects of Embodiment 1> As described above, the method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 1 reduces the deterioration of the ionization ratio k caused by the local strain distribution and non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, by performing a high-temperature energization process. This reduces multiplication noise and makes it possible to easily manufacture a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication with high receiving sensitivity.

[0083] Embodiment 2. <Effect of noise reduction by low-temperature energization process> In the depletion layer of the APD, increasing the electric field increases the movement speed of electrons and holes. However, when the electric field exceeds several hundred kV / cm, the movement speed reaches a point where it no longer increases. This speed is called the saturation speed. When a voltage is applied in the reverse direction to the pn junction of the APD, an electric field of 500 kV / cm to 1000 kV / cm is applied to the multiplier layer, and electrons and holes move within the multiplier layer at the saturation speed. The kinetic energy of electrons and holes (m・v 2 The higher the (2) value, the greater the effect of mitigating and stabilizing the local distortion distribution due to current application. Therefore, applying current while increasing the saturation speed can result in noise reduction.

[0084] According to R. Quay et al., “A temperature-dependent model for the saturation velocity in semiconductor,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 3, pp. 149-155 (2000), the saturation velocity Vs(T) of electrons and holes at lattice temperature T is expressed by the following equation (8).

[0085] Vs(T) = Vs(300K) / [(1-A) + A・(T / 300)] (8) In equation (8), T is the lattice temperature (K), Vs(T) is the saturation rate at lattice temperature T, and A is the temperature coefficient.

[0086] As is clear from equation (8), by reducing the lattice temperature T, the saturation rate can be increased, and furthermore, the kinetic energy of electrons and holes can be increased, thereby enabling relaxation and stabilization of the local strain distribution of the multiplier layer in an APD having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer.

[0087] APD is composed of multiple compound semiconductor materials with different compositions. Since each material has a different coefficient of thermal expansion, the local strain distribution of the multiplier layer differs between low and high temperatures. Therefore, there are areas where the amount of strain increases locally at low temperatures. In other words, the areas where relaxation and stabilization of the local strain distribution can be achieved by applying current at low temperatures are different from those where it can be achieved by applying current at high temperatures. Furthermore, by applying current at low temperatures in addition to high temperatures, relaxation and stabilization of the local strain distribution can be expected.

[0088] <Low-temperature energization process> The temperature range for the low-temperature energization process is preferably from -196°C, which is the liquid nitrogen temperature that can be stably achieved, to room temperature (25±10°C).

[0089] For a suitable current-taking voltage range, the reverse voltage of the APD must be above the reach-through voltage in order for electrons to be efficiently injected into the multiplier layer, while it must be 1.1 times or less of the breakdown voltage in order to prevent excessive current flow and burnout. Here, the reach-through voltage is the voltage at which the multiplier M is approximately 1.1 times or more, and the breakdown voltage is the voltage at which the multiplier M is 8 times or 1.1 to 1.2 times the voltage at which the multiplier M is 8 times, or the voltage at which the multiplier M is 20 times, or the voltage at which the dark current is 100 μA or more. A range of 80% to 100% of the breakdown voltage at the current-taking temperature is even more preferable in that current-taking can be completed in a short time and degradation due to overcurrent can be prevented.

[0090] The energizing time is preferably within the range of 0.2 hours to 100 hours, during which the rapid change in dark current subsides. It is even more preferable that the energizing time be within the range of 0.5 hours to 48 hours. Note that 0.5 hours is the time required for the temperature of the energizing chamber to stabilize, and 48 hours is a constraint time considering productivity.

[0091] <Effects of Embodiment 2> As described above, the method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 2 reduces the deterioration of the ionization ratio k caused by the local strain distribution and non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, by performing a low-temperature energization process. This reduces multiplication noise and makes it possible to easily manufacture a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication with high receiving sensitivity.

[0092] Embodiment 3. <Noise Reduction by Light Incidence and Current Application Process> By applying current to the APD while light is incident on it, a large number of electrons and holes can be generated. When a large number of electrons and holes collide with atoms and the lattice, the unstable local lattice strain distribution becomes uniform and stable. Therefore, relaxation and stabilization of the local strain distribution in the multiplier layer of an APD having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer can be achieved.

[0093] Figure 13 is a diagram showing the energizing circuit used in the light incidence energizing step in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 3. Figure 14 is a diagram showing the reverse voltage dependence of the photocurrent and dark current of the APD in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 3. In the light incidence energizing step, light is incident on the pn junction of the APD while applying a reverse voltage using the energizing circuit shown in Figure 13. As shown in Figure 14, a photocurrent, i.e., electrons and holes, that is more than an order of magnitude larger than the dark current, flows. The wavelength of the incident light is preferably within the range of 1.2 μm to 1.6 μm, which is absorbed by the InGaAs light absorption layer.

[0094] A suitable amount of photocurrent for the APD in the photo-injection current-encouraging process is the photocurrent density (A / m). 2 ) is 3.2 x 10 2 A / m 2 from 3.2 x 10 6 A / m 2 The amount of incident light and the applied voltage may be set and power supplied so that the current value falls within the specified range. 2 A / m 2 This refers to the current density equivalent to 1 mA at a light-receiving diameter of 1 mmΦ on the light-receiving surface of the APD, which is 3.2 × 10⁻⁶.6 A / m 2 This refers to a current density equivalent to 1 mA at the light-receiving diameter of 10 μmΦ on the light-receiving surface of the APD.

[0095] In the light injection and energization process, the amount of light incident on the APD is preferably 1 μW or more so that the photocurrent is greater than the dark current, and 100 mW or less so that the APD is not damaged by over-input. A range of 100 μW to 1 mW is even more preferable for stable APD operation.

[0096] The temperature for the light incidence current application process is preferably within the range from -196°C, which is the stable liquid nitrogen temperature, to 200°C, which is a high temperature. A temperature range of 25±5°C, which is room temperature, to 85°C or lower, which is the maximum operating temperature, is even more preferable.

[0097] In the photo-induced energizing process, a suitable energizing voltage range is required for the APD's reverse voltage to be above the reach-through voltage in order for electrons to be efficiently injected into the multiplier layer, while it must be below 1.1 times the breakdown voltage in order to prevent excessive current flow and burnout. Here, the reach-through voltage is the voltage at which the multiplier M is approximately 1.1 times or more, and the breakdown voltage is the voltage at which the multiplier M is 8 times or 1.1 to 1.2 times the voltage at which the multiplier M is 8 times, or the voltage at which the multiplier M is 20 times, or the voltage at which the dark current is 100 μA or more. A range of 80% to 100% of the breakdown voltage at the energizing temperature is even more preferable in that energizing can be completed in a short time and degradation due to overcurrent can be prevented.

[0098] In the light-induced energizing process, the energizing time is preferably within the range of 0.2 hours to 100 hours, which is when the rapid change in dark current subsides. More preferably, the energizing time is within the range of 0.5 hours to 48 hours. Note that 0.5 hours is the time required for the energizing chamber temperature to stabilize, and 48 hours is a constraint time considering productivity.

[0099] <Effects of Embodiment 3> As described above, the method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 3 reduces the deterioration of the ionization ratio k caused by the local strain distribution and non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, by performing a light injection current application process. This reduces multiplication noise and makes it possible to easily manufacture a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication with high receiving sensitivity.

[0100] Embodiment 4. <Noise Reduction by Forward Voltage Energization Process in a Method for Manufacturing Semiconductor Photodetectors for Optical Communication> Embodiments 1 to 3 relate to energization processes utilizing reverse voltage energization. Embodiment 4, on the other hand, relates to a forward voltage energization process for an APD having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer.

[0101] By applying a forward voltage to the APD, it becomes possible to flow more than 100 times more electrons and holes than by applying a reverse voltage to the APD. When a large number of electrons and holes collide with atoms, i.e., the lattice, the lattice temperature rises even if the velocity of the electrons and holes is slow, and the distribution of unstable local lattice strain becomes uniform and stable. Therefore, relaxation and stabilization of the local strain distribution within the multiplier layer of an APD having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer can be achieved.

[0102] Figure 15 shows the forward current dependence of the temperature rise near the multiplier layer of an APD. The built-in voltage of the APD is 0.75V, the element resistance is 20Ω, and the thermal resistance is 300KW. As shown in Figure 15, when a forward current is passed through the APD, the temperature near the multiplier layer rises. As can be seen from Figure 15, a forward current of 110mA raises the temperature near the multiplier layer by approximately 100°C. In other words, when energized at room temperature, the temperature near the multiplier layer becomes 125°C.

[0103] Forward current density (A / m 2 ) is 3.2 x 10 4 A / m 2 The above 3.2 x 10 8 A / m 2The current value should be set as follows. For high-speed APDs, the light-receiving diameter is about 10 μmΦ, so 100 mA ± 50 mA is considered optimal. Note that 3.2 × 10 4 A / m 2 This refers to a current density equivalent to 100 mA at a light-receiving diameter of 1 mmΦ on the light-receiving surface of the APD, which is 3.2 × 10⁻⁶. 8 A / m 2 This refers to a current density equivalent to 100 mA at the light-receiving diameter of 10 μmΦ on the light-receiving surface of the APD.

[0104] Regarding the temperature range for the forward voltage energization process, considering that the electrode ohmic portion may burn out if a current of several tens of mA is applied at temperatures above 200°C, a temperature range of 25°C to 200°C is preferable. A temperature range of 85°C to 180°C is even more preferable. Note that 85°C is the maximum temperature during actual use, and 180°C is a temperature with a 10% margin relative to 200°C.

[0105] The energizing time in the forward voltage energizing process is preferably within the range of 0.2 hours to 100 hours, which is when the rapid change in dark current subsides. More preferably, the energizing time is within the range of 0.5 hours to 48 hours. Note that 0.5 hours is the time required for the energizing chamber temperature to stabilize, and 48 hours is a constraint time considering productivity.

[0106] <Effects of Embodiment 4> As described above, the method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 4 reduces the deterioration of the ionization ratio k caused by the local strain distribution and non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, by performing a forward voltage energization process. This reduces multiplication noise and makes it possible to easily manufacture a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication with high receiving sensitivity.

[0107] <Regarding each step in the manufacturing method of the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiments 1 to 4> Based on the manufacturing flow diagram in Figure 16, the timing of the power-on process in the APD manufacturing flow will be explained in particular.

[0108] The APD manufacturing flow has optimal processes for each stage, from substrate loading to the completion of inspection. The process of forming the APD, i.e., from substrate loading to back electrode formation, is a known manufacturing method, so we will omit the explanation.

[0109] After the back electrode formation process ST001, which completes the configuration as an APD, the surface-incident APD 100 is completed through the following processes: wafer inspection process ST002, which inspects the element characteristics in the wafer state; chip separation process ST003, which separates the chips individually from the wafer; assembly and mounting process ST004, which assembles and mounts the separated individual chips; and inspection process ST005, which inspects the assembled and mounted APD.

[0110] The energizing step in the manufacturing method of a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiments 1 to 4 may be performed at any of the following timings in the APD manufacturing flow described above: timing P1 after the back electrode formation step ST001, timing P2 after the wafer inspection step ST002, timing P3 after the chip separation step ST003 for separating chips individually from the wafer, timing P4 after the assembly and mounting step ST004 for assembling and mounting the separated individual chips, and timing P5 after the inspection step ST005 for inspecting the assembled and mounted APD.

[0111] As an example of how to perform the energizing process at timing P1 after the back electrode formation process ST001 and at timing P2 after the wafer inspection process ST002, energizing using a prober 60 as shown in Figure 17 can be mentioned. In energizing using a prober 60, the prober 60 is brought into contact with the APD chip 62 formed on the wafer 61 to apply energy. Therefore, energizing using a prober 60 is efficient because the energizing process can be performed with a simple equipment configuration.

[0112] The reason for performing the energizing process after the back electrode formation process ST001 is to relieve the stress during back electrode formation by performing the energizing process after the back electrode formation. Furthermore, performing the energizing process at timing P4 after the assembly and mounting process ST004, or at timing P5 after the inspection process ST005, is even more preferable because it also relieves the stress on the solder when mounting the APD.

[0113] Embodiment 5. <Noise Reduction by Applying High-Temperature Annealing in a Manufacturing Method for Semiconductor Photodetectors for Optical Communication> High-temperature annealing after crystal growth is also effective in stabilizing the local strain distribution of the digital alloy structure multiplier layer. However, when a digital alloy structure is annealed at high temperatures, i.e., heat-treated, it may become disordered, resulting in a random alloy structure. Therefore, it is necessary to alleviate the local strain distribution using the minimum necessary processing temperature and processing time.

[0114] Since order is likely to occur when dopants in a semiconductor layer undergo thermal diffusion, a heat treatment temperature lower than the temperature at which dopants begin to diffuse is preferable. For example, if the dopant is Be, a heat treatment temperature of 650°C or lower is preferable, and if the dopant is Zn, a heat treatment temperature of 500°C or lower is preferable.

[0115] On the other hand, in order to obtain the effect of high-temperature annealing, a heat treatment temperature of 300°C or higher is preferable, as this is the temperature at which vacancies in the semiconductor layer move. A heat treatment time of 0.5 hours or more is preferable, which corresponds to the temperature stabilization time after inserting the wafer into the annealing furnace.

[0116] Furthermore, even at temperatures lower than the temperature at which dopants begin thermal diffusion, prolonged heat treatment can lead to the separation of phosphorus and arsenic, which are constituent elements of the semiconductor layer, and the diffusion of dopant within the semiconductor layer. To prevent the separation of phosphorus and arsenic, a heat treatment time of 10 hours or less, preferably 3 hours or less, is preferable, as this limits dopant diffusion to a small amount.

[0117] Therefore, in the APD manufacturing flow shown in Figure 16, annealing, or heat treatment, at relatively high temperatures is possible from after crystal growth until before the surface electrode formation process. Heat treatment within the range of 300°C to 650°C is preferred when the dopant is Be, and heat treatment within the range of 300°C to 500°C is preferred when the dopant is Zn. Furthermore, in order to prevent oxidation of the semiconductor layer, an arsenic atmosphere, a phosphorus atmosphere, a nitrogen atmosphere, a hydrogen atmosphere, or a vacuum is preferred as the atmosphere inside the energizing bath 50.

[0118] From the back electrode formation process ST001 onward, although the effect of high-temperature heat treatment is reduced, the electrodes sink into the semiconductor layer, so the heat treatment temperature needs to be lowered. Therefore, when an energizing process is performed from the back electrode formation process ST001 onward, the heat treatment temperature is preferably in the range of 300°C to 400°C. After mounting the APD, that is, from the assembly mounting process ST004 onward, the heat treatment temperature is preferably in the range of 100°C to 250°C to prevent melting of mounting materials such as solder. In addition, to prevent oxidation of the semiconductor layer, a nitrogen atmosphere, a hydrogen atmosphere, or a vacuum is desirable as the atmosphere inside the energizing chamber 50.

[0119] <Effects of Embodiment 5> As described above, the method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 5 reduces the deterioration of the ionization ratio k caused by the local strain distribution and non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer by performing a high-temperature heat treatment process. This reduces multiplication noise and makes it possible to easily manufacture a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication with high receiving sensitivity.

[0120] Embodiment 6. <Noise Reduction by Applying Temperature Cycling in a Method for Manufacturing Semiconductor Photodetectors for Optical Communication> As a method to alleviate localized strain distribution, temperature cycling may be applied to the APD. Temperature cycling is a method of alleviating localized strain distribution by repeatedly raising and lowering the temperature, for example, by repeating a temperature cycle of 30°C, 400°C, 30°C, 400°C.

[0121] In the APD manufacturing flow shown in Figure 16, if performed before the back electrode formation process ST001, the high-temperature side of the temperature cycle is preferably between 300°C and 500°C, and the low-temperature side is preferably between room temperature and 100°C. If performed after the back electrode formation process ST001 or the assembly and mounting process ST004, the high-temperature side of the temperature cycle is preferably between 85°C and 250°C, and the low-temperature side is preferably between -45°C and 30°C. The number of temperature cycles is preferably between 10 and 300 cycles.

[0122] <Effects of Embodiment 6> As described above, the method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to Embodiment 6 reduces the deterioration of the ionization ratio k caused by the local strain distribution and non-uniformity and instability of the electric field in a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having a digital alloy structure multiplier layer by performing a temperature cycling process. This reduces multiplication noise and makes it possible to easily manufacture a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication with high receiving sensitivity.

[0123] While this disclosure describes various exemplary embodiments and examples, the various features, aspects, and functions described in one or more embodiments are not limited to the application of a particular embodiment, but can be applied individually or in various combinations to the embodiments.

[0124] Accordingly, countless variations not illustrated are conceivable within the scope of the art of this disclosure. These include, for example, modifying, adding or omitting at least one component, or extracting at least one component and combining it with components of other embodiments.

[0125] 1 n-type InP substrate, 1a Fe-doped semi-insulating InP substrate, 2 n-type InAlAs buffer layer, 2a n-type InP window layer, 3, 3a i-type InAs / AlAs digital alloy structure multiplication layer, 4, 4a p-type InP field relaxation layer, 5, 5a i-type InGaAs light absorption layer, 6, 6a i-type InAlGaAs / InAlAs graded layer, 7 p-type InP window layer, 7a p-type InP buffer layer, 8 p-type InGaAs contact layer, 8a n-type InGaAs contact layer, 31, 31a n-type electrode, 32, 32a p-type electrode, 50 energizing cell, 60 prober, 61 wafer, 62 APD chip, 100, 110 surface incident APD

Claims

1. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication, comprising at least the step of applying a reverse voltage to the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication, which has at least a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, for a period of 0.2 hours or more and 100 hours or less.

2. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to claim 1, characterized in that the reverse voltage is equal to or greater than the reach-through voltage of the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication and less than or equal to 1.1 times the breakdown voltage.

3. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the heat treatment temperature when the reverse voltage is applied is 120°C or more and 200°C or less.

4. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the heat treatment temperature when the reverse voltage is applied is -196°C or higher and 35°C or lower.

5. A method for manufacturing an optical communication semiconductor photodetector according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that when the reverse voltage is applied, light with an intensity of 1 μW or more and 100 mW or less is incident on the optical communication semiconductor photodetector.

6. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type semiconductor layer, a p-type field relaxation layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer, a light absorption layer formed on the p-type field relaxation layer, and a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the light absorption layer.

7. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a light-absorbing layer formed on the p-type semiconductor layer, an n-type field relaxation layer formed on the light-absorbing layer, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type field relaxation layer, and an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer.

8. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication, comprising at least the step of applying a forward current to the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication, which has at least a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, for a period of 0.2 hours or more and 100 hours or less.

9. The current density of the forward current is 3.2 × 10⁻⁶ 4 A / m 2 The above 3.2 x 10 8 A / m 2 The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communications according to claim 8, characterized in that it is as follows.

10. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication according to 8 or 9, characterized in that the heat treatment temperature when the forward current is flowing is 25°C or more and 200°C or less.

11. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to any one of claims 8 to 10, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type semiconductor layer, a p-type field relaxation layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer, a light absorption layer formed on the p-type field relaxation layer, and a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the light absorption layer.

12. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to any one of claims 8 to 10, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a light-absorbing layer formed on the p-type semiconductor layer, an n-type field relaxation layer formed on the light-absorbing layer, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type field relaxation layer, and an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer.

13. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication, comprising at least the steps of: heat-treating the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication, which has at least a digital alloy structure multiplier layer, at a temperature of 300°C to 650°C; and forming electrodes on the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication after the heat treatment.

14. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communications according to claim 13, characterized in that the heat treatment time is 0.5 hours or more and 10 hours or less.

15. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to 13 or 14, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type semiconductor layer, a p-type field relaxation layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer, a light absorption layer formed on the p-type field relaxation layer, and a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the light absorption layer.

16. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to 13 or 14, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a light-absorbing layer formed on the p-type semiconductor layer, an n-type field relaxation layer formed on the light-absorbing layer, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type field relaxation layer, and an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer.

17. A method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector for optical communication, comprising at least the steps of: forming electrodes on the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication having at least a digital alloy structure multiplier layer; and performing a temperature cycle on the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication after electrode formation at a high temperature of 85°C to 250°C and a low temperature of -45°C to 30°C.

18. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to 17, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type semiconductor layer, a p-type field relaxation layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer, a light absorption layer formed on the p-type field relaxation layer, and a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the light absorption layer.

19. The method for manufacturing a semiconductor photodetector according to 17, characterized in that the semiconductor photodetector for optical communication comprises a semiconductor substrate, a p-type semiconductor layer formed on the semiconductor substrate, a light-absorbing layer formed on the p-type semiconductor layer, an n-type field relaxation layer formed on the light-absorbing layer, a digital alloy structure multiplier layer formed on the n-type field relaxation layer, and an n-type semiconductor layer formed on the digital alloy structure multiplier layer.