Method for preventing incorrect setting of diverging routes during co-line operation in rail transit control system, system, electronic device, and readable storage medium
By using the LATS system to check the route conditions and track occupancy of shared-line operations in rail transit control systems, the problem of incorrectly processing branch routes has been resolved, improving the accuracy and safety of operations.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- WO · WO
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- CASCO SIGNAL LTD
- Filing Date
- 2025-09-10
- Publication Date
- 2026-07-02
Smart Images
Figure CN2025120399_02072026_PF_FP_ABST
Abstract
Description
A method, system, electronic device, and readable storage medium for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems. Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of co-line operation in rail transit, and more specifically to a method, system, electronic device, and readable storage medium for preventing erroneous branching routes in co-line operation of rail transit control systems. Background Technology
[0002] With the rapid development of my country's economy and the rapid changes in society, urban rail transit is gradually transitioning from a single line to a network structure formed by multiple lines. Due to the limited and expensive resources in city centers, many cities have begun to experiment with shared-line operation models to make effective use of these resources and to strengthen connections between suburbs and urban areas. The main advantages of this model are: 1) Saving construction costs, as multiple lines can share tracks, avoiding redundant construction; 2) Providing more travel options to meet the diverse travel needs of passengers; 3) Optimizing resources and increasing capacity, significantly increasing the total operating mileage within a limited line length. For example, after two lines operate on the same line, optimizing train intervals and frequencies can greatly improve the overall capacity of the line; 4) Fully utilizing the remaining capacity of existing lines.
[0003] As can be seen from the above, co-line operation is an efficient and brand-new operating model. However, in practical applications, due to the complexity of co-line operation and other factors, it is easy to make mistakes in processing routes for co-line segments. However, few teams have conducted research and development to solve and improve this problem.
[0004] It is understood that the above statements only provide background information related to the present invention and do not necessarily constitute prior art. Summary of the Invention
[0005] The purpose of this invention is to provide a method, system, electronic device, and readable storage medium for preventing erroneous branching routes in co-line operation of rail transit control systems. This method uses the LATS system to check route conditions and whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route start signal is occupied, which can effectively reduce the risk of erroneously processing routes outside the co-line section during co-line operation, providing a guarantee for the stable operation of the project and the travel safety of passengers, and helping to ensure the accuracy and safety of train online operation.
[0006] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention is implemented through the following technical solution:
[0007] A method for preventing erroneous route splitting during co-line operation in a rail transit control system, comprising:
[0008] S102, the train is operating normally under online tracking.
[0009] S103, LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail;
[0010] S104. When the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic route condition check has passed.
[0011] S105. When the basic route conditions check is passed, find all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal, and check whether any track found is occupied.
[0012] S106. When all the tracks found are not occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
[0013] Optionally, in S103, the LATS system periodically checks whether the train is on the trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, it waits for the LATS system to check whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0014] Optionally, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail every 1 second.
[0015] Optionally, the basic route condition check includes: checking the occupancy status of equipment within the route and the lock status of turnouts.
[0016] Optionally, in S104, if the basic route condition check fails, the system returns to S103, and the LATS system checks whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0017] Optional, also includes:
[0018] S107. If any of the tracks found is occupied, return to S103. The LATS system will then check whether the train is on the trigger track in the next cycle.
[0019] Optionally, before step S102, the following may be included:
[0020] S101, Initialization phase: The LATS system reads the parameters from the configuration file.
[0021] Optionally, the parameters in the configuration file include at least one of the following: route trigger rail, basic conditions to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train group number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and correspondence between route and train group.
[0022] Optionally, in S102, the LATS system executes train tracking logic based on track occupancy and clearance, and the train number window of the track where the train is located contains the correct train number and destination number.
[0023] Optional, also includes:
[0024] S205. When the basic route conditions check is passed, the LATS system searches for the route number corresponding to the current train group number and selects the route number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two route numbers are consistent.
[0025] S206. If the two route numbers are the same, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
[0026] Optional, also includes:
[0027] S207. If the two line numbers are inconsistent, return to S103. The LATS system will check whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0028] Optional, also includes:
[0029] S305. When the basic route conditions check is passed, the LATS system searches for the train formation corresponding to the currently selected route and the current train formation, and determines whether the two formations are consistent.
[0030] S306. If the two groups are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
[0031] Optional, also includes:
[0032] S307 If the two train formations are inconsistent, return to S103, and the LATS system will check whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0033] Optionally, in S103, the LATS system narrows the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.
[0034] Optionally, a station server system is provided, which is used to implement the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous branching routes in co-line operation of rail transit control systems.
[0035] Optionally, an electronic device is provided, comprising: a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the aforementioned steps of the method for preventing erroneous branching of routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system.
[0036] Optionally, a readable storage medium stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous route splitting during co-line operation in a rail transit control system.
[0037] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:
[0038] This invention relates to a method, system, electronic device, and readable storage medium for preventing erroneous branching routes during co-line operation in rail transit control systems. The method uses a Linear Access System (LATS) to check route conditions and whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route start signal is occupied. This effectively reduces the risk of erroneously processing routes outside the co-line section during co-line operation, ensuring the operational stability of the project and the travel safety of passengers, and contributing to ensuring the accuracy and safety of train operation online. Attached Figure Description
[0039] To more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in the description will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are one embodiment of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort:
[0040] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a Y-type collinearity according to the present invention;
[0041] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a cross-type collinearity according to the present invention;
[0042] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of a collinear central region according to the present invention;
[0043] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a method of the present invention for preventing incorrect branching routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system;
[0044] Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the Baoshan Road Station, which is a common line in the central area of Figure 3;
[0045] Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of another method of the present invention for preventing incorrect branching routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system;
[0046] Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of another method of the present invention for preventing incorrect branching routes in the co-line operation of a rail transit control system. Detailed Implementation
[0047] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.
[0048] It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprising," "including," "having," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or terminal device that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or terminal device. Unless otherwise specified, an element defined by the phrase "comprising..." or "including..." does not exclude the presence of additional elements in the process, method, article, or terminal device that includes said element.
[0049] It should be noted that the accompanying drawings are all in a very simplified form and use non-precise ratios, and are only used to facilitate and clearly illustrate the purpose of the embodiments of the present invention.
[0050] In practical applications, shared-line operation can be applied to different lines in various forms. Taking actual projects as examples, as shown in Figures 1 to 3, there are several specific types: 1) Y-shaped shared line, exemplified by Chengdu Metro Lines 18 and 19; 2) Intersecting shared line, exemplified by the Hong Kong LAR Airport Line (including the Airport Line and Tung Chung Line); 3) Central area shared line, exemplified by Shanghai Metro Lines 3 and 4. As mentioned above, shared-line operation is an efficient and novel operating model. However, due to the complexity of shared-line operation, it is easy to make mistakes in processing shared-line routes. For example, in practical applications, factors such as track occupancy, lost train numbers, or incorrect train numbers may lead to incorrectly processed branching routes.
[0051] On the other hand, with the continuous increase in urban residents, the demand for urban rail transit passenger transport is increasing day by day. While new lines are constantly being opened, existing lines are also continuously adding vehicles to increase capacity. Technological advancements lead to the continuous introduction of new vehicles, resulting in multiple vehicle types existing on the same line or between different lines. For example, Shanghai Metro Line 3 includes three types of electric multiple unit (EMU) cars: 03A01, 03A02, and 03A03; while Line 4, which shares the line, has two types: 04A01 and 04A02. Different vehicle types have different lengths, widths, and interfaces, and mixed operation can affect normal function; furthermore, considering civil engineering, the distance between the platform and the train could potentially cause safety accidents.
[0052] In Figures 1 to 3, route A and route B correspond to routes exiting the shared section and heading to different lines. Once a route is approved, the signal opening is the basis for some non-CBTC system vehicles to proceed. Route approval is primarily based on the current train identification number and basic interlocking conditions. Existing signaling systems are based on track circuits for non-CBTC lines, such as Shanghai Metro Lines 3 / 4 and the Hong Kong LAR Airport Line. The ATS train tracking function relies on a single source of track circuit occupancy and clearance status, which cannot guarantee that the train number will match expectations under extreme conditions. Therefore, if a planned train arrives at the next station with an incorrect train number and comes to a complete stop, there is a possibility of automatically approving an incorrect route. Furthermore, in extreme scenarios such as delayed data transmission at the interlocking interface or abnormal track circuit timing changes, the possibility of train number loss cannot be completely avoided.
[0053] Considering the above factors, the key point is to ensure that the branching route is not mistakenly processed when the track is occupied or the train number is lost or has an incorrect number.
[0054] Based on the above, the present invention provides a method for preventing erroneous route splitting during co-line operation in a rail transit control system, as shown in Figure 4. The method includes:
[0055] S101. During the initialization phase, the LATS system (Local Automatic Train Supervision, station server system) reads the parameters from the configuration file (Ars.cfg).
[0056] Optionally, the parameters in the configuration file include at least one of the following: route trigger rail, basic conditions to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train group number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and correspondence between route and train formation. Of course, the parameters in the configuration file may also include other data, and this invention does not limit this.
[0057] S102, the train is operating normally under online tracking.
[0058] Specifically, in S102, the LATS system executes train tracking logic based on track occupancy and clearance, and the train number window of the track where the train is located contains the correct train number and destination number.
[0059] S103, LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.
[0060] Furthermore, in S103, the LATS system periodically checks whether the train is on the automatic route trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, it waits for the LATS system to check whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0061] Optionally, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail every 1 second.
[0062] S104. When the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic route condition check has passed.
[0063] Specifically, if the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks the basic conditions of the eligible route on the train's travel path based on the train's destination number. In this embodiment, the basic route condition check includes checking the occupancy status of equipment within the route and the lock status of switches. Of course, it may also include other conditions. Further, in S104, if the basic route condition check fails, the system returns to S103, and the LATS system checks whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0064] S105. When the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system finds all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal by searching the data file. The LATS system then determines whether any of the found tracks are occupied.
[0065] S106. When all the tracks found are not occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
[0066] Furthermore, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous branching routes in the co-line operation of the rail transit control system also includes: S107, if any of the tracks found is occupied, then return to S103, and the LATS system checks whether the train is on the trigger track in the next cycle.
[0067] As described above, the method of this invention for preventing erroneous route division in shared-line operation of rail transit control systems effectively reduces the risk of erroneous route division in shared-line operation by checking route conditions and whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route start signal is occupied through the LATS system. This provides a guarantee for the stable operation of the project and the travel safety of passengers, and helps to ensure the accuracy and safety of train operation. On the other hand, under the condition that the operating scenario remains unchanged, this method ensures the correct route division through occupancy checks. It can effectively protect against errors by combining the existing technical framework with the actual situation and some project-specific characteristics, and has more error-prevention logic, which can maximize the accuracy and safety of line operation.
[0068] Figure 5 shows a schematic diagram of Baoshan Road Station in the embodiment shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 5, the specific routes for the outbound shared section at Baoshan Road are: Line 3 X11H-X5H; Line 4 X11H-X7H. The trigger rails are the station's tracks TC26H, TC28H, and TC30H. Due to a communication delay, train number 413# entering the station lost its train number. When train 32758 arrived at the first trigger rail, it incorrectly triggered the route for Line 3, potentially causing a Line 4 train to enter the Line 3 area, posing a safety risk.
[0069] In practical applications, the above-described method of increasing the inspection section occupancy of the present invention can be applied to the co-line operation of this station to reduce the risk of incorrectly processing branch routes. Specifically, after the train passes the basic check on the trigger rail and meets the automatic route triggering requirement, an additional check is added for the occupancy of the preceding track (between the trigger rail and the route start signal). If any track is occupied, the automatic route condition check fails, and the route cannot be automatically triggered. In Figure 5, when train 32758 attempts to automatically trigger the X11H-X5H route, the occupancy of TC28H and TC30H is checked. If occupancy exists, automatic route processing is not allowed. When the train attempts to automatically trigger the X11H-X5H route at TC28H, the occupancy of TC30H is checked. If occupancy exists, automatic route processing is not allowed. This effectively avoids the risk of incorrect triggering caused by the loss of train set numbers.
[0070] On the other hand, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous route division in co-line operation of rail transit control systems further includes: in S103, the LATS system narrows the setting range of the trigger rails, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail. This reduces the number of trigger rails. For example, reducing the original three trigger rails in Figure 5 to a single rail ahead of the route effectively avoids erroneous route triggering. This method significantly reduces the risk of erroneous route division by modifying the operating scenario, such as triggering the route only on the original last trigger rail; that is, it can greatly reduce the risk of erroneous route division with the simplest modification.
[0071] Furthermore, as shown in Figure 6, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous branching of routes in the co-line operation of the rail transit control system further includes: S205, when the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches the configuration file, finds the line number corresponding to the current train set number and selects the line number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two line numbers are consistent through the LATS system; S206, if the two line numbers are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
[0072] Furthermore, the method also includes: S207, if the two line numbers are inconsistent, then return to S103, and the LATS system checks whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0073] Based on the above, this invention provides a method for adding line number checks, the preliminary steps of which are basically the same as those in the aforementioned method for adding check section occupancy. In this method, the parameters in the configuration file read by the LATS system include route trigger rails, basic condition checks, train set number and line number correspondences, and route and line number correspondences. This method adds line number correspondences to the train's physical formation through data configuration; it also adds line number correspondences to routes that can be automatically triggered. When the automatic route trigger meets the basic condition check, a line number check is added to prevent incorrect route assignment. By checking line numbers as described above, the risk of incorrect route assignment during co-line operation can be effectively reduced. This method can be seen as a further supplement to the aforementioned solution, effectively avoiding the risk of trains carrying incorrect train numbers and triggering incorrect routes. In practical applications, this method of adding line number checks can be applied to the cross-type co-line operation shown in Figure 2 to reduce the risk of incorrect route assignment. Of course, it can also be applied to other line types.
[0074] Furthermore, as shown in Figure 7, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous branching of routes in the co-line operation of the rail transit control system further includes: S305, when the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches for the train formation corresponding to the currently selected track line for which a route is to be processed and the current train formation, and determines whether the two formations are consistent through the LATS system; S306, if the two formations are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
[0075] Furthermore, the method also includes: S307, if the two groups are inconsistent, then return to S103, and the LATS system checks whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
[0076] Based on the above methods, this invention also provides a method for increasing train formation checks. The preliminary steps of this method are basically the same as those in the aforementioned method for increasing the occupation of inspection sections. In this method, the parameters in the configuration file read by the LATS system include route trigger rails, basic condition checks, and the correspondence between routes and train formations. This method fully identifies the characteristics of each line on a shared line, uncovers details, and avoids the risk of erroneous route triggering through simple condition checks. By checking train formations in the above way, the risk of erroneous route processing in shared line operations can be effectively reduced. In practical applications, this method of increasing train formation checks can be applied to the Y-type shared line operation shown in Figure 1 to reduce the risk of erroneous route processing. For example, if one line in a shared line operation only runs 8-car formations and the other only runs 4-car formations, controlling route processing through formation information is also an effective method. Of course, it can also be applied to other line types.
[0077] Based on the above, this invention provides multiple methods for automatically checking the conditions for processing routes for vehicles operating on the same line when exiting the same section, ensuring the accuracy and safety of train operation online. These methods are independent of each other. Building upon the method shown in Figure 4, one or more methods can be selected according to project needs to add strict control over the automatic processing of branch routes on shared operating lines, ensuring that the processed route is exactly what the train needs, thus greatly reducing the operational risks caused by incorrect route processing due to track circuit tracking anomalies. This method effectively solves the pain points and difficulties that users care about, improves the robustness of the system, and provides a good guarantee for stable operation at the project site.
[0078] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a station server system, which is used to implement the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous branching of routes in the co-line operation of rail transit control systems.
[0079] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides an electronic device, the electronic device comprising: a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the aforementioned steps of the method for preventing erroneous branching of routes in the co-line operation of a rail transit control system.
[0080] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a readable storage medium storing a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the aforementioned steps of the method for preventing erroneous branching routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system.
[0081] As can be seen from the above, all the solutions described in this invention can be automatically calculated by the backend server (electronic device), without involving user operation, and do not affect the use and operation of existing systems, thus ensuring accuracy without disturbing users. Furthermore, the above solutions design various methods for incorrectly issuing routes on shared-line operating sections, including both software modification support and data modification support, demonstrating strong versatility and flexibility. Furthermore, the above solutions can effectively reduce the risk of incorrectly issuing routes on shared-line sections, providing assurance for the operational stability of the project and the travel safety of passengers; furthermore, the above solutions provide solutions to key issues in shared-line operation, offering insights for future, better solutions.
[0082] In summary, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous branching routes in co-line operation of rail transit control systems, by using the LATS system to check route conditions and whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route start signal is occupied, can effectively reduce the risk of erroneously processing routes outside the co-line section during co-line operation, providing a guarantee for the stable operation of the project and the travel safety of passengers, and helping to ensure the accuracy and safety of train online operation.
[0083] Furthermore, this invention adds more condition checks based on project characteristics, provided that the basic conditions for route processing have been passed. This fully ensures that the processed route is exactly what the train needs, which can greatly reduce the operational and safety risks caused by incorrect route processing due to track circuit tracking anomalies. It effectively solves the pain points and difficulties that users care about, improves the robustness of the system, and provides a good guarantee for the stable operation of the project site.
[0084] Although the present invention has been described in detail through the preferred embodiments above, it should be understood that the above description should not be considered as a limitation of the present invention. Various modifications and substitutions to the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art after reading the above description. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present invention should be defined by the appended claims.
Claims
1. A method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems, characterized in that, Include: S102, the train is operating normally under online tracking. S103, LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail; S104. When the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic route condition check has passed. S105. When the basic route conditions check is passed, find all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal, and check whether any track found is occupied. S106. When all the tracks found are not occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
2. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In S103, the LATS system periodically checks whether the train is on the trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, it waits for the LATS system to check whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
3. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems as described in claim 2, characterized in that... The LATS system detects whether a train is on the trigger rail every 1 second.
4. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems as described in claim 1, characterized in that... The basic route condition check includes: checking the occupancy status of equipment and the locking status of turnouts within the route.
5. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems as described in claim 1, characterized in that... In S104, if the basic route condition check fails, the system returns to S103, and the LATS system checks whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
6. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems as described in claim 1, characterized in that... Also includes: S107. If any of the tracks found is occupied, return to S103. The LATS system will then check whether the train is on the trigger track in the next cycle.
7. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems as described in claim 1, characterized in that, Before S102, it also includes: S101, Initialization phase: The LATS system reads the parameters from the configuration file.
8. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in rail transit control systems as described in claim 7, characterized in that... The parameters in the configuration file include at least one of the following: route trigger rail, basic conditions to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train group number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and correspondence between route and train group.
9. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in a rail transit control system as described in claim 1, characterized in that... In S102, the LATS system executes train tracking logic based on track occupancy and clearance, and the train number window of the track where the train is located contains the correct train number and destination number.
10. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in a rail transit control system as described in claim 1, characterized in that... Also includes: S205. When the basic route conditions check is passed, the LATS system searches for the route number corresponding to the current train group number and selects the route number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two route numbers are consistent. S206. If the two route numbers are the same, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
11. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in a rail transit control system as described in claim 10, characterized in that... Also includes: S207. If the two line numbers are inconsistent, return to S103. The LATS system will check whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
12. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in a rail transit control system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, Also includes: S305. When the basic route conditions check is passed, the LATS system searches for the train formation corresponding to the currently selected route and the current train formation, and determines whether the two formations are consistent. S306. If the two groups are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.
13. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in a rail transit control system as described in claim 12, characterized in that... Also includes: S307 If the two train formations are inconsistent, return to S103, and the LATS system will check whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.
14. The method for preventing erroneous route division during co-line operation in a rail transit control system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In S103, the LATS system narrows the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.
15. A station server system, characterized in that, The station server system is used to implement the method described in any one of claims 1 to 14 for preventing erroneous branching routes during co-line operation in rail transit control systems.
16. An electronic device, characterized in that, The electronic device includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the method for preventing erroneous branching routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 14.
17. A readable storage medium, characterized in that, The readable storage medium stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method for preventing erroneous branching routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 14.