Multi-layer dynamic encryption system integrating contextual and ai-driven encoding for post-quantum security
Patent Information
- Application Number
- PCT/IB2026/056197
- Authority / Receiving Office
- WO · WO
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Priority Date
- 2025-04-18
- Filing Date
- 2026-06-17
- Publication Date
- 2026-10-22
Smart Images

Figure IB2026056197_22102026_PF_FP_ABST
Abstract
Description
[0001] WIPO
[0002] PATENT APPLICATION
[0003] Title of the Invention
[0004] Multi-Layer Dynamic Encryption System Integrating Contextual and AI-Driven Encoding for Post-Quantum Security
[0005] Cross-Reference to Related Applications
[0006] This application claims Priority from US Application Number: 19 / 182,812 filed on April 18th2025 the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference
[0007] Field of the Invention
[0008] The invention relates to the field of digital security, particularly to advanced, multi-layered encryption systems that resist decryption by quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and bruteforce attacks. This Application introduces transformation layers.
[0009] Background of the Invention
[0010] Traditional encryption models (e.g., RS A, AES, ECC) rely on fixed key structures and deterministic algorithms, making them vulnerable to emerging threats, including:
[0011] • Quantum computing decryption (e g., Shor’s algorithm)
[0012] • Al pattern recognition and adversarial decryption models
[0013] • Static key management flaws and predictability risks
[0014] This Application introduces two logical layers that enhance obfuscation and unpredictability by applying abstract contextual transformations and one-time challenge generation.
[0015] These enhancements:
[0016] • Do not rely on numeric key complexity
[0017] • Avoid reuse of encryption states
[0018] • Generate outputs that resist reverse-engineering and logical predictionSummary of the Inventions
[0019] Layer: Contextual Obfuscation Layer
[0020] • Applies abstract contextual reshaping to secured data
[0021] • Transforms digital input into non- identifiable, non-symbolic text structures
[0022] • Format is designed to resemble ordinary communication while embedding secure transformations
[0023] • Operates through private configuration rules, not visible externally
[0024] Layer : One-Time Adaptive Challenge Layer
[0025] • Generates dynamic, session-specific challenges upon data access
[0026] • Each challenge is context-aware and non-repeating
[0027] • Response must match the originating configuration model
[0028] • Adds a behavioral and logic-based verification process
[0029] Together, these layers produce a multi-tiered security architecture that is:
[0030] • Keyless
[0031] • Obfuscated
[0032] • Adaptive
[0033] • Resistant to both classical and next-generation attack models
[0034] Brief Description of the Drawings
[0035] Figure 1: System Overview Architecture
[0036] Figure 2: Data Flow: Input — Multi-Layer Encoding Process
[0037] Figure 3: Contextual Reshaping Model in Layer 2
[0038] Figure 4: Dynamic Challenge Mechanism Flow in Layer 3
[0039] Figure 5: Application in Simulated Messaging Environment
[0040] Figure 6: Secure Deployment Structure with Local Obfuscation Routing
[0041] Note to Examiner: Figures are illustrative only. No functional code, mappings, or methodologies are disclosed.I. Overview of the Multi-Layer Architecture
[0042] All layers are modular and isolated. Each one performs a self-contained logical transformation that is not reversible without internal configuration knowledge. These configurations are:
[0043] • Privately held
[0044] • Not derived algorithmically
[0045] • Not exposed via output data
[0046] IL Layer 1: Initial Transformation (As per Parent Filing)
[0047] Already disclosed in original application. Applies first-level non-key-based transformation to digital data using deterministic structure reshaping.
[0048] III. Layer 2: Contextual Obfuscation Transformation
[0049] • Operates on top of Layer 1
[0050] • Receives the already transformed data and applies further contextual reshaping
[0051] • Transformed data takes the form of plain language that carries no semantic trace of the original
[0052] • Each transformation rule is known only to the system operator
[0053] Example (Illustrative Only):
[0054] Input: “I will meet the fox at sunset.”
[0055] Transformed Output: “The rabbit dances before twilight.”
[0056] (Same meaning. No surface trace.)
[0057] No symbolic markers are used or exposed.
[0058] Transformation logic is not reusable without internal contextual structure.
[0059] IV. Layer 3: One-Time Adaptive Challenge Logic
[0060] • Activated upon request to access secured data
[0061] • System generates a time-specific transformation challenge
[0062] • Output appears as coherent but context-bound information
[0063] • Only a counterpart trained on the same configuration can resolve access
[0064] Every access attempt generates a new, non-repeating challenge, eliminating reuse or predictability.V. Layer 3 Deployment: Secure Obfuscation & Isolation
[0065] All transformations beyond Layer 1 are executed locally within secure, non-exportable runtime environments.
[0066] Components include:
[0067] • Contextual Transformation Module
[0068] • Response Validation Mechanism
[0069] • Interface Router (No external APIs exposed)
[0070] System structure ensures data never exits in decrypted or partially transformed states.
[0071] Runtime execution is obfuscated and isolated, preventing external mapping or monitoring.
[0072] Use Case Scenarios
[0073] • Military communications: Secure message transmission without traceable encoding • Secure financial data routing: Eliminates static payload risks
[0074] • Digital ID authentication: Challenge-response logic replaces password / key-based verification
[0075] • Enterprise & cloud environments: Each user receives unique access logic per session
Claims
Claims1. A contextual transformation system that obfuscates encrypted data into human-readable, non-repeating output formats known only to the system operator.
2. A one-time, dynamic challenge system that generates context-aware output upon each access attempt.
3. A non-symbolic data reshaping mechanism that resists Al pattern recognition and decryption heuristics.
4. A private configuration architecture wherein all transformation logic is isolated within local runtime.
5. A multi-layered encryption model integrating keyless transformation, contextual reshaping, and adaptive access logic.