Factory Automation Standard vs Modular PLC Platforms

7 min readTechnology pre-research

Factory Automation PLC Platform Evolution and Objectives

Programmable Logic Controllers have served as the backbone of industrial automation since their introduction in the late 1960s, when they were developed to replace complex relay-based control systems in automotive manufacturing. The initial PLCs were designed as monolithic, proprietary systems with fixed architectures, offering limited flexibility but high reliability for specific control tasks. Over the subsequent decades, the evolution of PLC platforms has been driven by increasing demands for flexibility, scalability, and interoperability in manufacturing environments.

The transition from standard PLC platforms to modular architectures represents a fundamental shift in industrial automation philosophy. Traditional standard PLCs featured integrated designs where processing units, input/output modules, and communication interfaces were tightly coupled within vendor-specific ecosystems. While these systems provided robust performance for dedicated applications, they presented significant limitations in terms of expandability and cross-platform integration. The emergence of modular PLC platforms in the 1990s introduced a component-based approach, allowing manufacturers to configure systems according to specific operational requirements by selecting and combining standardized modules.

Contemporary factory automation faces unprecedented challenges including the need for rapid production reconfiguration, integration of diverse industrial protocols, and support for Industry 4.0 initiatives such as edge computing and cloud connectivity. These demands have accelerated the development of highly modular, software-defined PLC architectures that blur the boundaries between traditional control systems and industrial computing platforms. Modern modular platforms emphasize open standards, distributed intelligence, and seamless integration with enterprise-level systems.

The primary objective of current PLC platform development centers on achieving optimal balance between standardization and modularity. This involves creating architectures that maintain the deterministic performance and reliability characteristics of traditional PLCs while incorporating the flexibility and scalability advantages of modular designs. Key technical goals include reducing total cost of ownership through reusable components, minimizing system integration complexity, enabling faster time-to-market for new production lines, and supporting seamless migration paths as manufacturing requirements evolve. The convergence of information technology and operational technology further drives objectives toward unified platforms capable of supporting both real-time control and advanced analytics functions within a single architectural framework.
Patent Trends

Market Demand for Standard and Modular PLC Solutions

The global market for programmable logic controllers is experiencing significant transformation driven by the convergence of Industry 4.0 initiatives, smart manufacturing requirements, and the increasing complexity of industrial automation systems. Manufacturing enterprises are actively seeking PLC solutions that can balance standardization benefits with the flexibility demands of diverse production environments. This dual requirement has created distinct market segments with varying preferences for standard versus modular PLC architectures.

Traditional standard PLC platforms continue to dominate in industries where proven reliability, simplified maintenance, and cost predictability are paramount. Sectors such as water treatment, building automation, and conventional assembly lines favor these solutions due to their straightforward implementation and lower total cost of ownership. The demand remains robust in emerging markets where manufacturing infrastructure is expanding rapidly and technical expertise may be limited.

Conversely, modular PLC systems are gaining substantial traction in advanced manufacturing sectors including automotive, pharmaceutical, semiconductor, and food processing industries. These sectors require scalable architectures that can accommodate frequent production line reconfigurations, support diverse communication protocols, and integrate seamlessly with enterprise-level systems. The ability to customize hardware configurations and expand system capabilities without complete platform replacement represents a compelling value proposition for manufacturers facing dynamic market conditions.

The automotive and electronics manufacturing sectors demonstrate particularly strong demand for modular solutions, driven by product diversification and shortened production cycles. These industries require PLC platforms capable of supporting rapid changeovers, handling complex motion control tasks, and interfacing with advanced robotics and vision systems. The pharmaceutical industry similarly prioritizes modular architectures due to stringent regulatory compliance requirements and the need for validated, traceable system modifications.

Small and medium-sized enterprises represent an evolving market segment with unique requirements. While historically constrained by budget limitations favoring standard solutions, these organizations increasingly recognize the long-term value of modular platforms that can scale with business growth. Cloud connectivity, remote monitoring capabilities, and simplified programming environments are becoming critical selection criteria for this segment, influencing vendor product development strategies and market positioning approaches.

PLC Platform Technology Development Timeline

Technology routes: Hardware Architecture Evolution (2017-2020: Distributed I/O modular architecture, 2020-2023: Edge computing integrated PLC platforms, 2023-2026: AI-enabled modular controllers); Software and Programming Standards (2017-2020: IEC 61131-3 standardization adoption, 2020-2023: Object-oriented programming frameworks, 2023-2026: Low-code configuration platforms); Communication Protocol Integration (2017-2021: OPC UA industrial protocol integration, 2021-2024: TSN time-sensitive networking support, 2024-2026: 5G wireless modular connectivity). Key events: 2017: IEC 61131-3 standard updated for modular PLC; 2019: OPC UA integrated into major PLC platforms; 2021: TSN technology adopted in factory automation; 2023: First AI-enabled modular PLC released; 2025: 5G-based wireless PLC modules commercialized. Application milestones: 2018: Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500; 2020: Rockwell Automation ControlLogix 5580; 2021: Beckhoff CX series; 2023: Schneider Electric Modicon M262; 2025: ABB AC500-S Safety PLC

⚑ Key Events in Technology
IEC 61131-3 standard updated for modular PLC
OPC UA integrated into major PLC platforms
TSN technology adopted in factory automation
First AI-enabled modular PLC released
5G-based wireless PLC modules commercialized
⬡ Technology Application Timeline
Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500
Rockwell Automation ControlLogix 5580
Beckhoff CX series
Schneider Electric Modicon M262
ABB AC500-S Safety PLC
Year
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Hardware Architecture Evolution
Distributed I/O modular architecture
Edge computing integrated PLC platforms
AI-enabled modular controllers
Software and Programming Standards
IEC 61131-3 standardization adoption
Object-oriented programming frameworks
Low-code configuration platforms
Communication Protocol Integration
OPC UA industrial protocol integration
TSN time-sensitive networking support
5G wireless modular connectivity

Major PLC Manufacturers and Competitive Landscape

The factory automation PLC platform market is experiencing a transitional phase from mature standardized solutions toward flexible modular architectures, driven by Industry 4.0 demands for customization and scalability. The market demonstrates substantial growth potential, particularly in Asia-Pacific regions, with established players commanding significant market share. Technology maturity varies considerably across the competitive landscape. Industry giants like Siemens AG, ABB Ltd., and Rockwell Automation Technologies dominate with comprehensive standard PLC ecosystems and are now advancing modular offerings. Mid-tier players including Endress+Hauser and Murrelektronik AG focus on specialized modular components and connectivity solutions. Emerging Chinese manufacturers such as Shenzhen Xinghe Automation, Atekon Technology, and Shenzhen Dobot represent growing regional competition with cost-effective modular platforms. Educational institutions like Northeastern University and Donghua University contribute to research advancement, while automation integrators like Shenzhen Defulai and Quanfuxiang bridge technology gaps through customized implementations, collectively pushing the industry toward open, interoperable modular standards.

Siemens AG

Technical Solution

Siemens offers comprehensive PLC solutions spanning both standard and modular platforms through their SIMATIC product line. Their standard S7-1200 series provides integrated automation for small to medium applications with built-in I/O and communication interfaces, while the modular S7-1500 platform enables scalable configurations with distributed I/O modules, advanced motion control, and TIA Portal engineering environment for unified programming. The company implements a hybrid architecture approach allowing seamless integration between standard compact controllers and modular distributed systems, supporting industrial Ethernet protocols including PROFINET for real-time communication. Their modular platform features hot-swappable modules, redundancy options, and flexible expansion capabilities up to thousands of I/O points, while standard platforms offer cost-effective solutions with pre-configured functionality for straightforward automation tasks.

Strengths: Industry-leading ecosystem with comprehensive software tools, extensive protocol support, and proven reliability in diverse industrial sectors. Weaknesses: Higher initial investment costs compared to competitors, steeper learning curve for complex modular configurations, proprietary technology creates vendor lock-in.

ABB Ltd.

Technical Solution

ABB provides dual-track PLC solutions with their AC500 standard PLC series and modular AC500-eCo platform designed for factory automation. The standard AC500 offers compact controllers with integrated I/O suitable for machine-level control, featuring IEC 61131-3 programming languages and built-in web server functionality. Their modular approach utilizes distributed architecture with remote I/O stations connected via industrial Ethernet and fieldbus networks, enabling flexible system expansion and maintenance. The AC500-eCo platform specifically targets cost-sensitive applications while maintaining scalability through modular I/O expansion. ABB's solution architecture emphasizes energy efficiency monitoring, predictive maintenance capabilities, and integration with their ABB Ability digital platform for cloud-based analytics. The systems support hot-swapping of modules in modular configurations and offer redundancy options for critical applications.

Strengths: Strong focus on energy efficiency and sustainability, excellent integration with robotics and drive systems, competitive pricing for modular solutions. Weaknesses: Smaller market share compared to Siemens, limited third-party integration options, less extensive training resources available globally.

Unlock 3 More Player Profiles

See who to benchmark—and what differentiates their technical routes.

Technical routes·Strengths & weaknesses·Patent signals
Free account · Continues with this report topic

Current PLC Architecture Challenges and Technical Barriers

Traditional PLC architectures face mounting pressure from evolving industrial requirements that demand greater flexibility, scalability, and integration capabilities. Legacy systems built on proprietary hardware and closed software ecosystems struggle to accommodate rapid changes in production lines, creating significant barriers to digital transformation initiatives. The rigid coupling between hardware components and programming environments limits manufacturers' ability to adapt quickly to market demands or implement incremental upgrades without substantial capital investment.

Interoperability remains a critical challenge as standard PLCs from different vendors typically operate within isolated ecosystems, making cross-platform communication and data exchange cumbersome. This fragmentation forces manufacturers to maintain multiple programming skill sets and toolchains, increasing operational complexity and training costs. The lack of standardized interfaces and communication protocols across vendors creates integration bottlenecks when attempting to build cohesive automation solutions from best-of-breed components.

Scalability constraints present another fundamental barrier, particularly for manufacturers seeking to expand production capacity or modify existing lines. Traditional architectures often require complete system replacements rather than modular expansions, resulting in extended downtime and disproportionate costs. The monolithic nature of conventional PLC designs makes it difficult to scale computing resources independently from I/O capabilities, leading to either over-provisioning or performance limitations.

Real-time performance requirements increasingly conflict with the need for advanced analytics and connectivity features. Standard PLCs optimized for deterministic control cycles struggle to simultaneously handle edge computing tasks, cloud connectivity, and data-intensive operations without compromising response times. This technical limitation forces manufacturers to deploy separate systems for control and information processing, creating architectural complexity and potential synchronization issues.

The emergence of Industry 4.0 paradigms exposes additional weaknesses in traditional PLC architectures, particularly regarding cybersecurity, remote accessibility, and lifecycle management. Older platforms lack modern security frameworks and struggle to implement robust authentication mechanisms or encrypted communications. Furthermore, the extended lifecycle of industrial equipment means many deployed systems cannot support contemporary software updates or security patches, creating persistent vulnerabilities in production environments.
Patent Trends

Mainstream Standard vs Modular PLC Architectures

Modular hardware architecture for PLC systems

Modular PLC platforms utilize standardized hardware components that can be easily assembled and configured. The modular design allows for flexible expansion and customization by adding or removing functional modules such as input/output modules, communication modules, and processing units. This architecture enables manufacturers to create scalable automation solutions that can be adapted to different production requirements without complete system redesign.

Specific solutions & implementation details

Modular hardware architecture for PLC systems

Modular PLC platforms utilize a hardware architecture that allows for flexible configuration and expansion through standardized modules. These systems feature interchangeable components that can be easily added or removed based on application requirements. The modular design enables scalability, simplified maintenance, and reduced downtime by allowing individual module replacement without affecting the entire system. This architecture supports various I/O modules, communication modules, and processing units that connect through standardized interfaces.

Standardized communication protocols and interfaces

Factory automation platforms implement standardized communication protocols to ensure interoperability between different modules and devices. These standards enable seamless data exchange across various components of the automation system, including PLCs, sensors, actuators, and supervisory systems. The standardized interfaces facilitate integration with existing industrial networks and support multiple communication methods. This approach reduces compatibility issues and allows for easier system expansion and integration with third-party equipment.

Distributed control architecture and networking

Modern modular PLC platforms employ distributed control architectures that distribute processing tasks across multiple interconnected modules. This approach enhances system reliability, performance, and flexibility by allowing control functions to be executed closer to the point of operation. The distributed architecture supports network-based communication between modules, enabling coordinated control across multiple zones or production lines. This design improves fault tolerance and allows for independent operation of subsystems in case of network disruptions.

Hot-swappable modules and redundancy features

Advanced modular PLC systems incorporate hot-swappable capabilities that allow modules to be replaced or added during operation without shutting down the entire system. This feature significantly reduces maintenance downtime and improves system availability. Redundancy mechanisms are integrated to ensure continuous operation even when individual modules fail. The systems include backup power supplies, redundant communication paths, and failover capabilities that automatically switch to backup modules when primary components malfunction.

Standardized programming environments and software platforms

Modular PLC platforms provide standardized programming environments that comply with international automation standards. These software platforms offer unified development tools for configuring, programming, and monitoring modular systems across different hardware configurations. The programming environments support multiple programming languages and provide libraries of pre-built function blocks for common automation tasks. This standardization reduces engineering time, simplifies training requirements, and enables code reusability across different projects and system configurations.

Standardized communication protocols and interfaces

Factory automation platforms implement standardized communication protocols to ensure interoperability between different modules and devices. These standards enable seamless data exchange and integration across various automation components, facilitating unified control and monitoring. The standardized interfaces support multiple industrial communication networks, allowing for easy connection and coordination of distributed control systems in manufacturing environments.

Programmable control logic and software frameworks

Modern modular PLC platforms feature advanced programming environments that support multiple programming languages and methodologies. The software frameworks provide standardized function blocks and libraries that simplify application development and reduce programming time. These platforms offer flexible programming tools that enable engineers to create, test, and deploy control logic efficiently across different automation scenarios.

Unlock 2 More Technical Solutions

Compare additional routes before deciding what to prototype or validate next.

Technical mechanisms·Implementation trade-offs·Validation priorities
Free account · Continues with this report topic

Core Patents in Modular PLC Design

Manufacturing Scalability & Cost

The standardization of industrial communication protocols represents a pivotal factor in determining the architectural choices between standard and modular PLC platforms in factory automation environments. As manufacturing facilities increasingly demand interoperability across diverse equipment and systems, the degree of protocol standardization directly influences platform selection strategies and implementation approaches. The evolution from proprietary communication systems toward open, standardized protocols has fundamentally altered the competitive landscape, enabling modular platforms to challenge traditional standard PLC dominance in specific application domains.

Protocol standardization initiatives such as OPC UA, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP, and EtherCAT have significantly reduced vendor lock-in concerns that historically favored standard PLC platforms. These open protocols facilitate seamless data exchange between devices from different manufacturers, thereby enhancing the viability of modular systems that rely on component interchangeability. The widespread adoption of Ethernet-based industrial protocols has particularly benefited modular architectures, as standardized communication layers enable flexible system configurations without sacrificing real-time performance or deterministic behavior critical to automation applications.

However, the impact of standardization varies considerably across different automation scenarios. In applications requiring ultra-low latency and guaranteed cycle times below one millisecond, proprietary optimizations within standard PLC platforms often maintain performance advantages despite protocol standardization efforts. Conversely, modular platforms excel in environments where protocol diversity and multi-vendor integration constitute primary requirements, leveraging standardized interfaces to provide superior flexibility and scalability.

The emergence of Time-Sensitive Networking standards and industrial 5G protocols further amplifies this impact, potentially reshaping the competitive dynamics between platform types. These advanced communication technologies promise to eliminate remaining performance gaps while maintaining standardization benefits, potentially accelerating the adoption of modular architectures in traditionally standard PLC-dominated applications. The ongoing convergence of IT and OT communication standards continues to influence platform evolution, driving both standard and modular PLC vendors toward greater protocol compatibility and interoperability capabilities.

Safety Standards & Benchmarks

The convergence of standard and modular PLC platforms in factory automation necessitates robust interoperability frameworks to ensure seamless communication across heterogeneous systems. Achieving interoperability requires adherence to established industrial communication protocols such as OPC UA, MQTT, and EtherCAT, which facilitate data exchange between devices from different manufacturers. Standard PLCs typically rely on vendor-specific protocols, creating integration barriers, while modular platforms increasingly adopt open standards to enable plug-and-play connectivity. The challenge lies in bridging legacy systems with modern architectures without compromising performance or security.

Ecosystem integration strategies must address both horizontal and vertical integration dimensions. Horizontal integration connects machines, sensors, and controllers at the operational level, enabling real-time data sharing for coordinated production processes. Vertical integration links shop floor systems with enterprise-level platforms such as MES and ERP, providing visibility across the entire value chain. Modular PLC platforms offer advantages in this context through their inherent flexibility and support for containerized applications, allowing easier integration with cloud services and edge computing infrastructure.

Middleware solutions and digital twin technologies play pivotal roles in facilitating ecosystem integration. Middleware acts as an abstraction layer that translates between different protocols and data formats, reducing integration complexity. Digital twins create virtual representations of physical assets, enabling simulation, monitoring, and optimization across diverse platform types. These technologies are particularly valuable when integrating standard PLCs with modular systems, as they provide a unified interface for data management and process control.

Strategic partnerships and industry consortia are essential for advancing interoperability standards. Collaborative initiatives such as the Open Industry 4.0 Alliance and PROFIBUS & PROFINET International drive the development of unified communication frameworks. Manufacturers must evaluate their ecosystem integration strategies based on factors including protocol compatibility, scalability requirements, cybersecurity considerations, and total cost of ownership. The selection between standard and modular platforms should align with the organization's long-term digital transformation roadmap and ecosystem participation strategy.

Turn This Report Into Your Next R&D Decision

Ask a focused question now. Get the first answer on this page, then continue deeper in the Technology Deep Research Agent.

Ask This Report →