Aftechmobile, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

4:19-cv-05902 N.D. Cal. Closed 5 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 20 Sep 2019 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and closed 12 Aug 2020, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: .

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patents involved
US8935321B1US8813028B2US10133558B2US8479154B1US8239840B1
Case no.
4:19-cv-05902
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
N.D. Cal.
Court level
District Court
Case region
California
Judge
Jon S. Tigar
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
20 Sep 2019 – 12 Aug 2020
Duration
327 days
Basis of termination
None recorded
Products & marks
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 4:19-cv-05902, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US8935321B1 Active App. US13/537496

Virtualized environment for managing heterogenous enterprise software applications

EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC

Methods and apparatus are provided for managing heterogeneous enterprise software applications (apps). A plurality of enterprise applications are provided to users of an enterprise by providing an enterprise application store having a plurality of enterprise applications that are available for download to mobile devices of the users; downloading one or more of the enterprise applications to a mobile device of at least one of the users; and providing a common interface for a plurality of the enterprise applications to a plurality of back-end servers of the enterprise. The enterprise application store may comprise a plurality of layers.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
13 Jan 2015
Est. expiry
29 Jun 2032
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F15/16
Prosecution counsel
Ryan, Mason & Lewis, LLP
US8935321B1 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1 · US8935321B1, from the published patent document
US8935321B1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2 · US8935321B1, from the published patent document
Get a novelty search report in Eureka
US8813028B2 Inactive App. US13/946325

Mobile application creation system

AFTECHMOBILE INC. (D/B/A MOBRISE INC.)

A computer implemented method and system for creating a mobile application provides a mobile application development software (MADS) and pre-coded software components (PCSCs) encapsulated in a mobile application creation interface (MACI). The MADS dynamically maps data to be rendered in the mobile application with one or more data sources and launches the MACI. The MADS creates one or more composite software components (CSCs) by combining more than one of distinct software components selected from component sources and/or the PCSCs. The MADS inserts one or more PCSCs and/or CSCs into the MACI. The MADS generates one or more recommendations for adding one or more characteristic objects associated with the mobile application. The MADS creates the mobile application using the inserted PCSCs, the created composite software components, the recommendations, the dynamically mapped data, and/or an adaptively configured application programming interfaces that facilitate backend integration of the mobile application with the user device.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
19 Aug 2014
Earliest priority
19 Jul 2012
Est. expiry
19 Jul 2033
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F9/44
US8813028B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1 · US8813028B2, from the published patent document
US8813028B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2 · US8813028B2, from the published patent document
Get a novelty search report in Eureka

Also asserted in this case

3 more

The docket lists 5 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 3 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.

Open all 5 patents in Eureka
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Todd Christopher AtkinsAftechmobile, Inc.Plaintiff
Ryan Justin SchletzbaumApple, Inc.Defendant
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

Case 4:19-cv-05902 · N.D. Cal. · closed 12 August 2020
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

Who else has this plaintiff sued? Every case naming Aftechmobile, with the patent, court and outcome for each Could my product read on this patent? Claim-by-claim comparison against your own design What else is litigated in this field? The dispute map for electric digital data processing
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 4:19-cv-05902?

4:19-cv-05902 is a patent infringement action brought by Aftechmobile, Inc. against Apple, Inc., filed on 20 Sep 2019 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The case closed on 12 August 2020.

Which patents were asserted in 4:19-cv-05902?

US8935321B1 (“Virtualized environment for managing heterogenous enterprise software applications”), assigned to EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC, currently active; US8813028B2 (“Mobile application creation system”), assigned to AFTECHMOBILE INC. (D/B/A MOBRISE INC.), currently inactive; US10133558B2 (“Application creation system”), assigned to AFTECHMOBILE INC. (D/B/A MOBRISE INC.); US8479154B1 (“Interaction with partially constructed mobile device applications”), assigned to GOOGLE LLC; US8239840B1 (“Sensor simulation for mobile device applications”), assigned to GOOGLE LLC.

How long did case 4:19-cv-05902 take?

327 calendar days, from filing on 20 Sep 2019 to closure on 12 August 2020.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 4:19-cv-05902?

Judge Jon S. Tigar presided. Todd Christopher Atkins is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Aftechmobile. Ryan Justin Schletzbaum appears for defendant Apple.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 4:19-cv-05902 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question
Next step

Go further with this record

Read how the method works, run it on your own product, then size the next step.

  • 01 / How-toUsing patent search for competitive intelligenceRead a rival's filings to see where its products are going.GuideRead
  • 02 / AI agentFTO ReportCheck whether your own product could read on these claims.Patsnap EurekaRun it
  • 03 / Free toolAI prior art searchDescribe an idea, get the closest patents.AI resultTry tool

More next stepsHow to run a freedom-to-operate analysis

Browse related dockets
Cases in N.D. Cal. Cases on electric digital data processing All patent litigation records

General information only. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 4:19-cv-05902 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. It does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Patent figures. Any patent drawings shown are reproduced from the identified patent publications to illustrate the cited documents, and do not establish the scope, validity or enforceability of any patent.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.