2-Way Computing, Inc. | Patent Litigation Record

14 cases on record

Cases on record: 14
As claimant: 14
As respondent: 0
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: H04L12/64 · H04M9/00

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
2:16-cv-01110	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Grandstream Networks, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	17 May 2016	323 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01111	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Telefield N.A., Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	17 May 2016	72 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01112	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	17 May 2016	164 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00946	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Genband, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	26 Apr 2016	276 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00947	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Vonage Holdings, Corp.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	26 Apr 2016	23 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00419	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	29 Feb 2016	80 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00420	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Shoretel, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	29 Feb 2016	80 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00423	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Unify, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	29 Feb 2016	255 d	Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-02228	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. 8x8, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	25 Nov 2015	189 d	Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-02230	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	25 Nov 2015	357 d	Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-02235	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	25 Nov 2015	190 d	Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-02236	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Mitel Networks Corporation	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	25 Nov 2015	184 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-02237	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	25 Nov 2015	197 d	Likely Settlement
2:11-cv-00012	2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Sprint Nextel Corporation	Plaintiff	D. Nev.	5 Jan 2011	1757 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming 2-Way Computing, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

2-Way Computing, Inc. Patent litigation record

14 cases on record

See what 2-Way Computing is protecting