22 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 22
- As claimant
- 0
- As respondent
- 22
- Patents held
- Not recorded
- Core tech
- Not recorded
| Case no. | Parties | Role | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7:25-cv-00487 | AlmondNet, Inc. v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 23 Oct 2025 | 285 d | Case Transferred |
| 7:25-cv-00356 | Flick Intelligence, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 19 Aug 2025 | 2 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 7:25-cv-00180 | Datonics LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 18 Apr 2025 | 466 d | Case Transferred |
| 7:25-cv-00019 | AK Meeting IP, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 21 Jan 2025 | 219 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:24-cv-00973 | WebSock Global Strategies, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 26 Aug 2024 | 17 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:23-cv-02696 | Silent Communication, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 31 May 2023 | 142 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 23-1711 | eSignature Software, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 6 Apr 2023 | 454 d | Appeal Dismissed |
| 3:22-cv-05962 | Esignature Software, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 12 Oct 2022 | 133 d | Judgment on the Merits |
| 1:22-cv-00598 | Via Technologies, Inc. v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 3 May 2022 | 315 d | Case Terminated |
| 6:22-cv-00247 | AK Meeting IP, LLC v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 8 Mar 2022 | 112 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:21-cv-01693 | Zoo Digital Limited v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | D. Colo. | 21 Jun 2021 | 127 d | Likely Settlement |
| 3:20-cv-07760 | SynKloud Technologies, LLC v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 3 Nov 2020 | 231 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:19-cv-00527 | SynKloud Technologies, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 6 Sep 2019 | 424 d | Case Transferred |
| 2019-2258 | Tecsec, Inc. v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 9 Aug 2019 | 441 d | Closed |
| 1:19-cv-01458 | Be TopNotch Wyoming, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 4 Aug 2019 | 44 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:19-cv-00975 | DRM Vectors, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 28 May 2019 | 43 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:19-cv-11177 | ViaTech Technologies, Inc. v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | D. Mass. | 24 May 2019 | 294 d | Case Transferred |
| 18-1343 | Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | U.S. Supreme Court | 25 Apr 2019 | 193 d | Appeal Denied |
| 3:18-md-02874 | Rah Color Technologies, LLC v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 6 Dec 2018 | 1026 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:18-cv-09344 | Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 31 Oct 2018 | 862 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:18-cv-01066 | Wiremed Tech, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 18 Jul 2018 | 331 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:18-cv-03277 | Rah Color Technologies, LLC v. Adobe Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 4 Jun 2018 | 1211 d | Voluntary dismissal |
See what Adobe is protecting
Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Analyse this portfolio- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.
Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.
Report an incorrect record
Tell us what is wrong on this page. The page address is included automatically.
Privacy request
For requests about your personal information on this page. The page address is included automatically.