Align Technology, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 23 cases

23 cases on record naming Align Technology, Inc.: 14 as claimant, 9 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

23 cases on record

Cases on record
23
As claimant
14
As respondent
9
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04N13/15 · G01B11/25 · H04N13/207 · H04N13/257 · G06T19/00 · G06T19/20 · A61C13/00 · A61C7/00 · G01B11/24 · G02B27/00 · G02B23/24 · A61C9/00 · A61C11/00 · A61C3/00 · A61C7/14 · A61B1/04 · A61B1/24 · A61B1/247 · A61B5/107 · A61C11/02 · A61C11/08 · A61B5/055
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
25-1879 Dental Monitoring, SAS v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Jun 2025 391 d Unpatentable
25-1881 Dental Monitoring, SAS v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Jun 2025 391 d Unpatentable
25-1752 Dental Monitoring, SAS v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 8 May 2025 459 d Vacated and Remanded
24-2270 Dental Monitoring, SAS v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 29 Aug 2024 677 d Appeal Dismissed
1:24-cv-00605 Patent Armory, Inc. v. Align Technology Inc. Defendant D. Del. 21 May 2024 85 d Dismissed with Prejudice
3:22-cv-07335 Dental Monitoring SAS v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 18 Nov 2022 1118 d Case Terminated
1:20-cv-01492 3Shape A/S v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 2 Nov 2020 486 d Likely Settlement
6:20-cv-00979 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 19 Oct 2020 507 d Voluntary dismissal
2020-2293 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 18 Sep 2020 103 d Closed
1:19-cv-02098 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff D. Del. 5 Nov 2019 63 d Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-00892 Align Technology, Inc. v. Strauss Diamond Instruments, Inc. Plaintiff M.D. Fla. 31 Jul 2019 96 d Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-1144 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 5 Mar 2019 623 d Closed
1:18-cv-01949 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Dec 2018 1178 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01950 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Dec 2018 731 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00886 3Shape A/S v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 14 Jun 2018 1358 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-00697 3Shape A/S v. Align Technology, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 8 May 2018 1395 d Likely Settlement
337-TA-1091 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 20 Dec 2017 702 d Closed
337-TA-1090 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 19 Dec 2017 605 d Closed
1:17-cv-01646 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff D. Del. 14 Nov 2017 1570 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01648 Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S Plaintiff D. Del. 14 Nov 2017 1570 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-04864 Align Technology, Inc. v. SmileCareClub, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 22 Oct 2015 288 d Likely Settlement
2014-1533 Align Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 9 Jun 2014 521 d Closed
4:11-cv-00695 Align Technology, Inc. v. ClearCorrect, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 28 Feb 2011 2950 d Out-of-court Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Align Technology, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Align Technology is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.