Analytical Technologies, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 19 cases

19 cases on record naming Analytical Technologies, LLC: 19 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
As claimant
19
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06Q30/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:24-cv-00490 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 3 Jul 2024 161 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00444 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2024 69 d Case Dismissed
2:24-cv-00445 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. American Dairy Queen Co. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2024 440 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00446 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Dennys Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2024 157 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00447 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Raising Canes USA, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2024 75 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00448 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2024 440 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00305 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 May 2024 145 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00306 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Delivery.com, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 May 2024 153 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00307 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Five Guys Properties, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 May 2024 205 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00308 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 May 2024 170 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00185 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Mar 2024 208 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-00174 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Toast, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2024 113 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00090 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Feb 2024 118 d Case Dismissed
2:24-cv-00052 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Jack In The Box, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 26 Jan 2024 297 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00054 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 26 Jan 2024 125 d Case Dismissed
2:24-cv-00056 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Zaxby's Franchising LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 26 Jan 2024 297 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-00401 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Yum! Brands, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 Sep 2023 159 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-00402 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Inspire Brands, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 Sep 2023 159 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-00288 Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Restaurant Brands International, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Jun 2023 311 d Case Dismissed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Analytical Technologies, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Analytical Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.