Arigna Technology Limited Patent litigation record

Company 18 cases

18 cases on record naming Arigna Technology Limited: 14 as claimant, 4 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

18 cases on record

Cases on record
18
As claimant
14
As respondent
4
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H03B5/12 · H03L1/02 · H01L29/78 · H03G3/10 · H03F1/56 · H03F3/19 · H03G3/00 · H03K17/0812 · H10D84/00 · G11C7/00 · G11C11/4067 · H03K19/091 · H03K17/06 · H03K17/08 · H03K17/56
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
23-1931 BMW v. Arigna Technology, Ltd. Defendant Fed. Cir. 22 May 2023 485 d Case Dismissed
1:23-cv-01190 Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v. Arigna Technology Limited Defendant Columbia District Court 28 Apr 2023 501 d Case Dismissed
23-1708 Infineon Technologies, AG v. Arigna Technology, Ltd. Defendant Fed. Cir. 6 Apr 2023 571 d Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-00126 Arigna Technology Limited v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Apr 2022 266 d Case Dismissed
1:22-cv-00277 BMW v. Arigna Technology Limited Defendant E.D. Va. 15 Mar 2022 692 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-00217 Arigna Technology Limited v. TCL Technology Group, Corp. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 28 Feb 2022 427 d Consent Judgment
337-TA-1308 Arigna Technology Limited v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 14 Feb 2022 518 d Case Settled
6:22-cv-00151 Arigna Technology Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 10 Feb 2022 445 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-00034 Arigna Technology Limited v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Feb 2022 84 d Likely Settlement
6:21-cv-01145 Arigna Technology Limited v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 8 Nov 2021 280 d Likely Settlement
2:21-cv-00377 Arigna Technology Limited v. Lg Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Oct 2021 310 d Likely Settlement
6:21-cv-01045 Arigna Technology Limited v. Google, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 6 Oct 2021 314 d Likely Settlement
6:21-cv-00943 Arigna Technology Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 10 Sep 2021 803 d Dismissed without Prejudice
6:23-cv-00712 Arigna Technology Limited v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 10 Sep 2021 803 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:21-cv-00172 Arigna Technology Limited v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 May 2021 355 d Procedural Outcome
2:21-cv-00174 Arigna Technology Limited v. General Motors Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 May 2021 460 d Likely Settlement
2:21-cv-00175 Arigna Technology Limited v. Daimler AG Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 May 2021 251 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00054 Arigna Technology Limited v. Volkswagen, AG Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Feb 2021 434 d Case Dismissed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Arigna Technology Limited in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Arigna Technology is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.