AuthPoint LLC Patent litigation record

Company 21 cases

21 cases on record naming AuthPoint LLC: 21 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
As claimant
21
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04L12/28 · H04M11/06 · H04H20/71 · H04L12/18 · G06F15/16 · H04K1/00 · G06F7/04 · H04M1/66
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:26-cv-00061 AuthPoint LLC v. Edimax Technology Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 23 Jan 2026 196 d Voluntary dismissal
2:26-cv-00062 AuthPoint LLC v. Evolve 3 Holdings Pty Ltd Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 23 Jan 2026 146 d Dismissed without Prejudice
1:25-cv-01377 AuthPoint LLC v. Adtran, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 13 Nov 2025 315 d Case Dismissed
2:25-cv-00885 AuthPoint LLC v. Adtran, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Aug 2025 82 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-03418 Authpoint LLC v. Megatel Industries Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Pa. 3 Jul 2025 12 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00545 AuthPoint LLC v. Senao Networks, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 May 2025 22 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00546 AuthPoint LLC v. Silex Technology, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 May 2025 361 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00549 AuthPoint LLC v. Zyxel Communications Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 May 2025 22 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00540 AuthPoint LLC v. D-Link, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 May 2025 24 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00541 AuthPoint LLC v. Foxconn Interconnect Technology Limited Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 May 2025 38 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00542 AuthPoint LLC v. Grandstream Networks, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 May 2025 68 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00543 AuthPoint LLC v. Hitron Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 May 2025 85 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00544 AuthPoint LLC v. Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 May 2025 232 d Closed
2:25-cv-01933 Authpoint LLC v. Miniorange Incorporated Plaintiff D.N.J. 18 Mar 2025 104 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-01934 Authpoint LLC v. RAD Data Communications Corp. Plaintiff D.N.J. 18 Mar 2025 127 d Voluntary dismissal
8:25-cv-00689 AuthPoint LLC v. Patton Electronics, Co. Plaintiff D. Md. 3 Mar 2025 373 d Closed
8:25-cv-00683 AuthPoint LLC v. GL Communications Inc. Plaintiff D. Md. 2 Mar 2025 457 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:25-cv-10395 AuthPoint LLC v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff D. Mass. 17 Feb 2025 44 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-02152 AuthPoint LLC v. Ping Identity, Corp. Plaintiff D. Colo. 4 Aug 2024 158 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00632 AuthPoint LLC v. Hewlett-Parkard, Co. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 4 Aug 2024 122 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00633 AuthPoint LLC v. Aruba Networks LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 4 Aug 2024 24 d Dismissed without Prejudice
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming AuthPoint LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what AuthPoint is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.