AuthWallet, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 20 cases

20 cases on record naming AuthWallet, LLC: 20 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
As claimant
20
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06Q20/00 · G06Q20/10 · G06Q20/20 · G06Q20/32
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:24-cv-03547 AuthWallet, LLC v. Total System Services, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 9 Aug 2024 82 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:24-cv-00594 AuthWallet, LLC v. Heartland Payment Systems, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 25 Jul 2024 50 d Dismissed without Prejudice
1:24-cv-03100 AuthWallet, LLC v. Global Payments Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 12 Jul 2024 67 d Voluntary dismissal
7:24-cv-00063 AuthWallet, LLC v. Fiserv, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Mar 2024 906 d Dismissed without Prejudice
7:24-cv-00064 AuthWallet, LLC v. Amarillo National Bank Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Mar 2024 895 d Dismissed without Prejudice
7:24-cv-00065 AuthWallet, LLC v. CIBC Bank USA Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Mar 2024 643 d Case Dismissed
7:24-cv-00066 AuthWallet, LLC v. Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Mar 2024 378 d Dismissed with Prejudice
7:24-cv-00067 AuthWallet, LLC v. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Mar 2024 11 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00244 AuthWallet, LLC v. Woodforest National Bank Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 3 Apr 2023 29 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00140 AuthWallet, LLC v. Amarillo National Bank Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 22 Feb 2023 105 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00141 AuthWallet, LLC v. CIBC Bank USA Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 22 Feb 2023 100 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00143 AuthWallet, LLC v. Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 22 Feb 2023 64 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00144 AuthWallet, LLC v. First Citizens Bank Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 22 Feb 2023 79 d Consent Judgment
6:23-cv-00146 AuthWallet, LLC v. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 22 Feb 2023 12 d Case Dismissed
4:22-cv-02749 AuthWallet, LLC v. Small Luxury Hotels of the World Management, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 12 Aug 2022 270 d Voluntary dismissal
22-1842 AuthWallet, LLC v. Block, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 31 May 2022 344 d Appeal Dismissed
1:21-cv-05463 AuthWallet, LLC v. Square, Inc. Plaintiff S.D.N.Y. 22 Jun 2021 315 d Judgment on the Merits
1:21-cv-03219 AuthWallet, LLC v. American Express Company Plaintiff S.D.N.Y. 13 Apr 2021 52 d Voluntary dismissal
4:21-cv-01203 AuthWallet, LLC v. Citigroup, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2021 128 d Voluntary dismissal
3:20-cv-04121 AuthWallet, LLC v. Visa, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 22 Jun 2020 46 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming AuthWallet, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what AuthWallet is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.