Bandspeed, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 21 cases

21 cases on record naming Bandspeed, Inc.: 21 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
As claimant
21
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04W4/00 · H04W4/80 · H04W72/54 · H04W84/18 · H04L5/00 · H04W72/08 · H04W84/20 · H04B1/715 · H04W24/08 · H04B17/02 · H04W72/00 · H04B17/40
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:24-cv-00116 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Vesync Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2024 258 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:23-cv-00593 Bandspeed, Inc. v. AppoTech Limited Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 25 May 2023 686 d Voluntary dismissal
1:23-cv-00558 Bandspeed, Inc. v. MPOW Technology Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 19 May 2023 692 d Voluntary dismissal
1:23-cv-00487 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Logitech, S.A. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 28 Apr 2023 250 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-01322 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Anker Innovations, Limited. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 16 Dec 2022 151 d Case Dismissed
1:22-cv-01223 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Asustek Computer, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 18 Nov 2022 532 d Dismissed without Prejudice
1:22-cv-00833 Bandspeed, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 17 Aug 2022 357 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-00614 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 23 Jun 2022 467 d Dismissed with Prejudice
5:21-cv-00086 Bandspeed, LLC v. Qorvo, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Jun 2021 377 d Likely Settlement
1:21-cv-00430 Bandspeed, LLC v. Broadcom Integrated Circuit (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 14 May 2021 277 d Closed
1:20-cv-01222 Bandspeed, LLC v. Intel Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 15 Dec 2020 129 d Likely Settlement
1:20-cv-00765 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Realtek Semiconductor, Corp. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 20 Jul 2020 1271 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:19-cv-00936 Bandspeed, LLC v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 23 Sep 2019 602 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-01015 Bandspeed, LLC v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 27 Nov 2018 336 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00518 Bandspeed, LLC v. Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 21 Jun 2018 151 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-00519 Bandspeed, LLC v. Microchip Technology, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 21 Jun 2018 229 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00434 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 9 May 2014 363 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00435 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 9 May 2014 466 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00436 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 9 May 2014 1291 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00437 Bandspeed, Inc. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 9 May 2014 332 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00438 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Texas Instruments Incorporated Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 9 May 2014 998 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Bandspeed, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Bandspeed is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.